ML062020402

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:42, 13 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RITSTF Meeting of June 29, 2006 - Risk Management Technical Specification Initiative Status Enclosure 4
ML062020402
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/21/2006
From: Tjader T
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DIRS/ITSB
To: Bradley B
Nuclear Energy Institute
Tjader T., NRC/ITSB, 415-1187
Shared Package
ML062060031 List:
References
Download: ML062020402 (10)
v • d • e


Text

I-.RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY ITechnical Specification

  • NRC issued the CLIIP 0 NRC issued.the TSTF-422 Notice of Availability TSTF-422-A RO (CEOG)Required Actions Notice of Availability for on July 5, 2005.Preferred End States TSTF-422 on July 5, 2005. 0 NCisethTSF2NocefAvlalty TSTF-423-A RO (BWROG)* NRC issued the CLIIP on March 23, 2006. TSTF-43 1 RO (BWOG)Notice of Availability for TSTF-423 on March 10, 0 TSTF-43 1 was distributed to the BWOG and the TSTF-432 RO (WOG)2006. RITSTF for review on 7/11/04. (Not created)* BWOG Topical Report (BAW-244 1) was submitted to NRC on 1/19/04. The NRC provided RAIs on 6/29/04. The BWOG responded to the RAls in 2/05.* The NRC provided the draft SE for the BWOG Topical Report for review in May 2006. Areva preparing comments.

TSTF-43 1 will be revised and submitted to the NRC following approval of.the Topical Report. Implementation guidance to be developed.

  • TSTF-358, R6 has been 0 Initiative Complete.

TSTF-358-A R6 SR 3.0.3 approved and published for CLIIP adoption.

0 The TSTF issued implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-0 1, for TSTF-358 on 5/05/06.NEI Biff Bradley Tony Pietrangelo TSTF Donald Hoffman, EXCEL Brian Mann, EXCEL EPRI Frank Rahn John Gaertner 202 739-8083 202 739-8081 301 984-4400 301 9844400 650 855-2037 704 547-6169 NEI RITSTF PWR/ Jack Stringfcllow, Southern Nuclear W Jim Andrachck, Westinghouse Jerry Andre, Westinghouse PWR' David Rothrock, PGN B&W Stanley Levinson, Framatome Mike Kitlan, Duke 205 992-7037 412 374-5018 412 374-4723 352 563-4771 434 832-2768 980 373-8348 PWRI Alan Hackerott, OPPD CE Gary Chung, SCE Ray Schneider, CE BWR Fred Emerson, GE Tom Carrier, Eri 402 533-7276 949 368-9431 860 731-6461 910 675-5615 856-339-2120 Page I of 76/920 6/29/2006 0, RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/

TSTF NUMBER_____________

_________________RESPONSIBILITY 3 Increase Flexibility in *TSTF-3 59, R9, has been 0 Initiative Complete.

TSTF-359-A R9 Mode Restraints LCO approved and published for 3.0.4 CLIIP adoption.

0 The TSTF issued updated implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-02, for TSTF-359 on 5/08/06 4a Individual Risk Informed Completion Times Owners Groups (OGs) are pursuing generic Risk Informed Completion Time extensions through OG-specific Topicals and license amendments." TSTF-373R2, "Increase CIV Completion Time in Accordance With CE-NPSD-1 168," approved on 2/27/04.* The Notice for Comment for TSTF-409R2,"Containment Spray System Completion Time Extension (CE NPSD- 1045-A)," was published on 4/11/06. The RITSTF provided comments; on 5/10/06. On 6/13/06, NRC provided responses and requested a meeting." TSTF-41 7R0, "AC Electrical Power System Completion Times (WCAP-15622)," has been withdrawn.

  • TSTF-430R0, "AQT Extension to 7 Days for LPI and Containment Spray (PAW-2295-A, Rev. 1)," approved on 8/5/04.* NRC accepted TSTF-439R2, "Eliminate Second Completion Times Limiting Time From Discovery of Failure To Meet an LCO," as an administrative change in Rev. 3.1 of the ISTS NUREGs." The NRC completed -their review of the Topical Report that supports TSTF-446R0, "Risk Informed Evaluation of Extensions to Containment Isolation Valve Completion Times (WCAP- 1579 1)," on 3/.10/06.

Additional issues being pursued by the lead plant (Wolf Creek). RAI response scheduled to be submitted in July. Revision to the Topical Report or Traveler may be required." TSTF-454RI, "Extend PCIV Completion Times (NEDC-33046)," approved on 12/13/05.TSTF-373-A R2 (CEOG)TSTF-409 R2 (CEOG)TSTF-417 RO (WOG)TSTF-43 0-A RO (BWOG)TSTF-439-A R2 (ALL OG)TSTF-446 RO (WOG)TSTF-454-A RI (BWROG).1. 1 _________________________________

+/-Page 2 of 7 6/29/2006 Page 2 of 7 6/29/2006 p.RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE 1 TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

]~TST-F NUMBER_____ _______________I RESPONSIBILITY I 4b Risk Informed Completion Times With Configuration Risk Management Program or Maintenance Rule Backstop 0 Fort Calhoun, South Texas Project, and Prairie Island have volunteered to develop pilot submittals.

  • Fort Calhoun and South Texas Project have submitted their pilots." The RITSTF is working to resolve the NRC's comments on the Risk Management Guidelines, the STP submittal, and the Traveler.* RITSTF will develop aWhite Paper to address the interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and transition for ITS and non ITS plants and will provide to NRC be 12/05." The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.* The RITSTF provided responses to the NRC and met to discuss these responses on 12/15/04.* NRC visited STP week of 1/ 18/05 to evaluate applications of Initiative 4b.* NRC and RITSTF met 3/17-18/05 and 5/3-5/4, 2005 to discuss policy issues.* The RITSTF has revised the draft Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines document incorporating the results of the discussions with the NRC. The revised draft RMTS document was provided to the NRC at the August 2005 RITSTF/NRC meeting." NRC provided comments; on the draft RMTS to RITSTF on 9/21/05. RITSTF developing a response.* NRC and RITSTF met in 12/2005 to discuss the RAI responses on the STP pilot." RITSTF provided the revised RMTS guidelines document to the NRC on 2/3/06.* NRC and RITSTF met to review the RMTS guidelines document on 2/28/06 and 4/27/06.* RITSTF provided a revised RMTS guideline document to the NRC on 4/3/06 and 5/10/06.* NRC visited STP 6/19-22/06 to audit process.* The TSTF will submit a revision to TSTF-424 to address the NRC comments in the Fall of 2006.TSTF-424 RO Pagec3 of 76/926 6/29/2006 R1TSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE

'TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/

TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 5a Relocate Surveillance

  • Deterministic portion of 0 TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated.

None assigned Requirements Not Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety TSTF responsibility.

0 PWROG and BWROG to determine if funding will be requested for this initiative by 12/06.5b Relocate Surveillance

  • RLTSTF/BWROG/Pilot 0 The Limerick lead plant license amendment was TSTF-425 RO Test Intervals to Plant are applying the submitted on 6/11/04.Licensee Control methodology and interfacing with the NRC on
  • TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.the issues.* NEI provided the formal methodology document to the NRC on 2/3/05.0 NRC reviewed the Limerick LAR, TSTF-425, and the methodology document and issued RAIs 4/12/05 to the RITSTF.* The NRC provided additional comments and the first set of RAIs on 10/20/05.* The RITSTF has submitted responses to the first set of NRC RAIs in 12/05 and has significantly revised the methodology document.

Limerick submitted responses to plant-specific RAIs in 12/05, 2/28/06, and 4/4/06.* At the 2/22/0 6 TSTF/NRC meeting, the NRC stated that before approving TSTF-425 for general adoption, they would like a second lead plant in order to verify that the methodology is transferable.

0 The NRC held an internal meeting on 5/30/06 to discuss the Electrical Engineering Branch's comments on TSTF-425.* On 6/6/2006, NRC provided additional RAIs to Limerick.0 Limerick preparing response to NRC's RAIs.Draft to be provided to NRC in early 7/200 6.L _________________

Page 4 of 7 6/29/2006 Page 4 of 7 6/29/2006 t ýRITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULEI TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a Modify LCO 3.0.3

  • On hold.
  • On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1 determine if Initiative 6a is required.hour -24 hours 6b Provide Conditions in
  • NRC issued Safety 0 NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO the LCOs for Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.Levels of Degradation Report on 7/9/04.Where No Condition
  • TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on Currently Exists to
  • TSTF-426 RO was 8/30/04.Preclude Entry Into submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.* The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.* NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.6c Provide Specific Times o NRC issued Safety
  • NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO in the LCO For Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.Conditions That Report on 7/9/04.Require Entry Into & TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 Immediately
  • TSTF-426 RO was 8/30/04.submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.-The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.* The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.* NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.PageS5 of 76/900 6/29/2006 RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONSISCIIEDULE/

I TSTF NUMBER I J ~~~~RESPONSIBILITY I__________

7a Impact of Non Technical Specification Design Features on Operability Requirements

-Barriers* The NRC issued the FRN Notice of Availability for TSTF-372, Rev. 4 on 5/4/05.* The TSTF issued implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-05-03, for TSTF-372 on 11/1/105." The NRC issued the FRN Notice for Comment for TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/06.* The NRC published the FRN Notice of Availability for TSTF-372 on 5/4/05.TSTF-372-A R4 TSTF-427 RO* The TSTF issued implementation guidance for TSTF-372 on 11/1/105.* TSTF-427 Implementation Guidance was provided to the NRC on 09/21/04.

NRC provided comments on the draft guidance on 10/ 13/04.*NRC provided RAIs on TSTF-427 and the implementation guidance on' 11/13/04 and 6/2/2005.

RITSTF provided responses to the NRC's RAIs on 3/23/05.* Members of the TSTF & RITSTF met with the NRC on 7/28/05 to discuss the NRC comments.* The revised Implementation Guidance and a draft of TSTF-427 were provided to the NRC on 1/ 10/05. The NRC provided comments in 12/05.The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 2/3/06. The RITSTF submitted the Implementation Guidance on 2/6/06.* The RITSTF submitted the revised Implementation Guidance to address NRC comments on 4/4/06.* The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 5/3/06.* The NRC issued the FRN Notice for Comment for TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/06. The TSTF and RITSTF to submit comments.Page 6 of 762906 6/29/2006 RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/

TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b Impact of Non TS

  • A White Paper on the 0 RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the None assigned Design Features on process to address this scope process and to address the scope of SSCs in 12/06.Operability of SSCs is being developed.

Requirements

-All 0 The TSTF will develop a Traveler following NRC other SSCs not in acceptance of the White Paper process.Technical Specifications

________________

__________________________

8a Remove or Relocate

  • A White Paper on the
  • The TSTF has developed a White Paper to outline None assigned Systems LCOs That Do application of the 10 CFR the guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-Not Meet the 4 50.36 criteria has been 04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 Criterion of 10 CFR developed.

CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for 50.36 From Technical relocation.

Specifications

  • The White Paper was provided to the Owners Groups in 12/05. The TSTF and RITSTF will develop a draft Traveler for Owners Group consideration by the third quarter of 2006.8b Modify 50.36 Rule to
  • Requires Rulemaking
  • RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with Not applicable Permit Removal or longer-term.

initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk rulemak-ing.

Significant Systems out of Technical

  • Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications Criterion 4 a "two way door" (e.g., if it doesn't meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).PWROG -Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 BWROG -Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 Page 7 of 762/06 6/29/2006
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML062020402&oldid=1839819"