ML062020402

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RITSTF Meeting of June 29, 2006 - Risk Management Technical Specification Initiative Status Enclosure 4
ML062020402
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/21/2006
From: Tjader T
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DIRS/ITSB
To: Bradley B
Nuclear Energy Institute
Tjader T., NRC/ITSB, 415-1187
Shared Package
ML062060031 List:
References
Download: ML062020402 (10)
v • d • e


Text

I-.

RISK INFORMED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE (RITSTF)

RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY ITechnical Specification

Required Actions Notice of Availability for on July 5, 2005.

Preferred End States TSTF-422 on July 5, 2005. 0 NCisethTSF2NocefAvlalty TSTF-423-A RO (BWROG)

Notice of Availability for TSTF-423 on March 10, 0 TSTF-43 1 was distributed to the BWOG and the TSTF-432 RO (WOG) 2006. RITSTF for review on 7/11/04. (Not created)

  • BWOG Topical Report (BAW-244 1) was submitted to NRC on 1/19/04. The NRC provided RAIs on 6/29/04. The BWOG responded to the RAls in 2/05.
  • The NRC provided the draft SE for the BWOG Topical Report for review in May 2006. Areva preparing comments. TSTF-43 1 will be revised and submitted to the NRC following approval of.

the Topical Report. Implementation guidance to be developed.

  • WOG submitted their Topical Report on 9/9/05.
  • NRC will review the WOG Topical Report in FY 06.

2 Missed Surveillances

NEI RITSTF NEI Biff Bradley 202 739-8083 PWR/ Jack Stringfcllow, Southern Nuclear 205 992-7037 PWRI Alan Hackerott, OPPD 402 533-7276 Tony Pietrangelo 202 739-8081 W Jim Andrachck, Westinghouse 412 374-5018 CE Gary Chung, SCE 949 368-9431 TSTF Donald Hoffman, EXCEL 301 984-4400 Jerry Andre, Westinghouse 412 374-4723 Ray Schneider, CE 860 731-6461 Brian Mann, EXCEL 301 9844400 PWR' David Rothrock, PGN 352 563-4771 BWR Fred Emerson, GE 910 675-5615 EPRI Frank Rahn 650 855-2037 B&W Stanley Levinson, Framatome 434 832-2768 Tom Carrier, Eri 856-339-2120 John Gaertner 704 547-6169 Mike Kitlan, Duke 980 373-8348 Page I of 76/920 6/29/2006

0, RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER

______________________________RESPONSIBILITY 3 Increase Flexibility in *TSTF-3 59, R9, has been 0 Initiative Complete. TSTF-359-A R9 Mode Restraints LCO approved and published for 3.0.4 CLIIP adoption. 0 The TSTF issued updated implementation guidance, TSTF-IG-06-02, for TSTF-359 on 5/08/06 4a Individual Risk Owners Groups (OGs) are " TSTF-373R2, "Increase CIV Completion Time in TSTF-373-A R2 (CEOG)

Informed Completion pursuing generic Risk Accordance With CE-NPSD-1 168," approved on Times Informed Completion Time 2/27/04.

extensions through OG-specific Topicals and

  • The Notice for Comment for TSTF-409R2, TSTF-409 R2 (CEOG) license amendments. "Containment Spray System Completion Time Extension (CE NPSD- 1045-A)," was published on 4/11/06. The RITSTF provided comments; on 5/10/06. On 6/13/06, NRC provided responses and requested a meeting.

" TSTF-41 7R0, "AC Electrical Power System TSTF-417 RO (WOG)

Completion Times (WCAP-15622)," has been withdrawn.

approved on 8/5/04.

  • NRC accepted TSTF-439R2, "Eliminate Second TSTF-439-A R2 (ALL OG)

Completion Times Limiting Time From Discovery of Failure To Meet an LCO," as an administrative change in Rev. 3.1 of the ISTS NUREGs.

" The NRC completed -their review of the Topical TSTF-446 RO (WOG)

Report that supports TSTF-446R0, "Risk Informed Evaluation of Extensions to Containment Isolation Valve Completion Times (WCAP- 1579 1)," on 3/.10/06. Additional issues being pursued by the lead plant (Wolf Creek). RAI response scheduled to be submitted in July. Revision to the Topical Report or Traveler may be required.

" TSTF-454RI, "Extend PCIV Completion Times TSTF-454-A RI (BWROG)

(NEDC-33046)," approved on 12/13/05.

.1. 1 _________________________________ +/- 6/29/2006 of 77 Page 22 of 6/29/2006

p.

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE 1 TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ ]~TST-F NUMBER

_____ _______________I RESPONSIBILITY I 4b Risk Informed 0 Fort Calhoun, South Texas

  • RITSTF will develop aWhite Paper to address the TSTF-424 RO Completion Times Project, and Prairie Island interface of the a.4 process to the Initiative 4b and With Configuration have volunteered to develop Initiative 6 process to show the overlap and Risk Management pilot submittals. transition for ITS and non ITS plants and will Program or provide to NRC be 12/05.

Maintenance Rule

  • Fort Calhoun and South Backstop Texas Project have " The RITSTF has created an Initiative 4b Subgroup submitted their pilots. to coordinate responses to the NRC RAIs.
  • The RITSTF provided responses to the NRC and

" The RITSTF is working to met to discuss these responses on 12/15/04.

resolve the NRC's comments on the Risk

  • NRC visited STP week of 1/18/05 to evaluate Management Guidelines, applications of Initiative 4b.

the STP submittal, and the

  • NRC and RITSTF met 3/17-18/05 and 5/3-5/4, Traveler. 2005 to discuss policy issues.
  • The RITSTF has revised the draft Risk-Managed Technical Specifications (RMTS) Guidelines document incorporating the results of the discussions with the NRC. The revised draft RMTS document was provided to the NRC at the August 2005 RITSTF/NRC meeting.

" NRC provided comments; on the draft RMTS to RITSTF on 9/21/05. RITSTF developing a response.

  • NRC and RITSTF met in 12/2005 to discuss the RAI responses on the STP pilot.

" RITSTF provided the revised RMTS guidelines document to the NRC on 2/3/06.

  • NRC and RITSTF met to review the RMTS guidelines document on 2/28/06 and 4/27/06.
  • RITSTF provided a revised RMTS guideline document to the NRC on 4/3/06 and 5/10/06.
  • NRC visited STP 6/19-22/06 to audit process.
  • The TSTF will submit a revision to TSTF-424 to address the NRC comments in the Fall of 2006.

Pagec3 of 76/926 6/29/2006

R1TSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE 'TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 5a Relocate Surveillance

  • Deterministic portion of 0 TSTF reviewing candidate SRs to be relocated. None assigned Requirements Not Initiative 5 transferred to Related to Safety TSTF responsibility. 0 PWROG and BWROG to determine if funding will be requested for this initiative by 12/06.

5b Relocate Surveillance

  • RLTSTF/BWROG/Pilot 0 The Limerick lead plant license amendment was TSTF-425 RO Test Intervals to Plant are applying the submitted on 6/11/04.

Licensee Control methodology and interfacing with the NRC on

  • TSTF-425 was submitted to the NRC on 8/31/04.

the issues.

  • NEI provided the formal methodology document to the NRC on 2/3/05.

0 NRC reviewed the Limerick LAR, TSTF-425, and the methodology document and issued RAIs 4/12/05 to the RITSTF.

  • The NRC provided additional comments and the first set of RAIs on 10/20/05.
  • The RITSTF has submitted responses to the first set of NRC RAIs in 12/05 and has significantly revised the methodology document. Limerick submitted responses to plant-specific RAIs in 12/05, 2/28/06, and 4/4/06.
  • At the 2/22/0 6 TSTF/NRC meeting, the NRC stated that before approving TSTF-425 for general adoption, they would like a second lead plant in order to verify that the methodology is transferable.

0 The NRC held an internal meeting on 5/30/06 to discuss the Electrical Engineering Branch's comments on TSTF-425.

  • On 6/6/2006, NRC provided additional RAIs to Limerick.

0 Limerick preparing response to NRC's RAIs.

Draft to be provided to NRC in early 7/200 6.

L _________________ 6/29/2006 Page of 77 Page 44 of 6/29/2006

t ý RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCHEDULEI TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 6a Modify LCO 3.0.3

  • On hold.
  • On hold for resolution of Initiative 6b and 6c to None assigned Actions and Timing 1 determine if Initiative 6a is required.

hour - 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> 6b Provide Conditions in

  • NRC issued Safety 0 NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO the LCOs for Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.

Levels of Degradation Report on 7/9/04.

Where No Condition

  • TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on Currently Exists to

Preclude Entry Into submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.

The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.

  • The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.
  • NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.

6c Provide Specific Times o NRC issued Safety

  • NRC issued Safety Evaluation for Topical Report TSTF-426 RO in the LCO For Those Evaluation for Topical on 7/9/04.

Conditions That Report on 7/9/04.

Require Entry Into & TSTF-426 RO was submitted to the NRC on LCO 3.0.3 Immediately

submitted to the NRC on 8/30/04. 0 NRC provided an RAI on TSTF-426 on 11/13/04.

- The TSTF provided responses on 4/27/05.

  • The TSTF-426 Implementation Guidance was provided to NRC in 8/05.
  • NRC plans to issue the Notice for Comment by 7/15/06.

PageS5 of 76/900 6/29/2006

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONSISCIIEDULE/ I TSTF NUMBER I J ~~~~RESPONSIBILITY I__________

7a Impact of Non

  • The NRC issued the FRN
  • The NRC published the FRN Notice of TSTF-372-A R4 Technical Specification Notice of Availability for Availability for TSTF-372 on 5/4/05.

Design Features on TSTF-372, Rev. 4 on TSTF-427 RO Operability 5/4/05.

  • The TSTF issued implementation guidance for Requirements - Barriers TSTF-372 on 11/1/105.
  • The TSTF issued implementation guidance,
  • TSTF-427 Implementation Guidance was TSTF-IG-05-03, for TSTF- provided to the NRC on 09/21/04. NRC provided 372 on 11/1/105. comments on the draft guidance on 10/ 13/04.

" The NRC issued the FRN *NRC provided RAIs on TSTF-427 and the Notice for Comment for implementation guidance on' 11/13/04 and TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/2005. RITSTF provided responses to the 6/2/06. NRC's RAIs on 3/23/05.

  • Members of the TSTF & RITSTF met with the NRC on 7/28/05 to discuss the NRC comments.
  • The revised Implementation Guidance and a draft of TSTF-427 were provided to the NRC on 1/10/05. The NRC provided comments in 12/05.

The TSTF submitted a revision to TSTF-427 on 2/3/06. The RITSTF submitted the Implementation Guidance on 2/6/06.

  • The RITSTF submitted the revised Implementation Guidance to address NRC comments on 4/4/06.
  • The NRC issued the FRN Notice for Comment for TSTF-427, Rev. 2 on 6/2/06. The TSTF and RITSTF to submit comments.

Page 6 of 762906 6/29/2006

RITSTF INITIATIVE STATUS INITIATIVE TITLE INITIATIVE STATUS NEXT ACTIONS/SCIIEDULE/ TSTF NUMBER RESPONSIBILITY 7b Impact of Non TS

  • A White Paper on the 0 RITSTF will develop a White Paper to outline the None assigned Design Features on process to address this scope process and to address the scope of SSCs in 12/06.

Operability of SSCs is being developed.

Requirements - All 0 The TSTF will develop a Traveler following NRC other SSCs not in acceptance of the White Paper process.

Technical Specifications ________________ __________________________

8a Remove or Relocate

  • A White Paper on the
  • The TSTF has developed a White Paper to outline None assigned Systems LCOs That Do application of the 10 CFR the guidance and methodology based on NEI 00-Not Meet the 4 50.36 criteria has been 04 for the application of the four criteria of 10 Criterion of 10 CFR developed. CFR 50.36 and a list of the systems identified for 50.36 From Technical relocation.

Specifications

  • The White Paper was provided to the Owners Groups in 12/05. The TSTF and RITSTF will develop a draft Traveler for Owners Group consideration by the third quarter of 2006.

8b Modify 50.36 Rule to

  • Requires Rulemaking
  • RITSTF looking at coordinating Initiative 8b with Not applicable Permit Removal or longer-term. initiatives given the requirements for Relocation of Non Risk rulemak-ing.

Significant Systems out of Technical

  • Approach favored by NEI and NRC is making Specifications Criterion 4 a "two way door" (e.g., if it doesn't meet Criterion 4, Specification can be relocated even if it meets Criteria 1, 2, or 3).

PWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5, 6 and 7 BWROG - Active in Initiatives 1, 4, 5 and 8 Page 7 of 762/06 6/29/2006

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML062020402&oldid=2188799"