05000272/FIN-2009007-01
From kanterella
Revision as of 20:38, 28 October 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Failure to Establish Goals and Monitor for (a)(1) Service Water System |
Description | The inspectors identified a non-cited violation of very low safety significance of 10 CFR 50.65, Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants, paragraph (a)(1), for PSEGs failure to monitor the performance of the service water system against established (a)(1) goals in a manner sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that the system was capable of fulfilling its intended function. PSEG also failed to take corrective action when system performance exceeded the (a)(1) unavailability goals. Specifically, PSEG failed to establish (a)(1) goals and monitor service water system performance from January 2008 through October 2008. Additionally, the inspectors identified a second example of this issue when PSEG failed to recognize that the service water system exceeded the new (a)(1) monitoring goals from April 2009 through June 2009. PSEG entered this issue into their corrective action program under notifications 20422672 and 20422673. This finding is more than minor because it is associated with the equipment performance attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone and affects the cornerstone objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e. core damage). This finding is not suitable for evaluation using the SDP because the performance deficiency did not cause the degraded equipment performance. Findings for which the SDP does not apply may be Green or assigned a severity level after NRC management review. Per the guidance provided in Inspection Procedure 71111.12, this issue is considered to be a Category II finding and thus, per NRC management review, is considered to be Green. With respect to assigning a cross-cutting aspect to this finding, the inspectors determined that the most meaningful insight into PSEGs performance was a programmatic concern with the implementation of the maintenance rule program at Salem. PSEG acknowledged this programmatic concern, which included ownership and accountability issues, initiated a focused self-assessment of the maintenance rule program, and will assign corrective actions as appropriate. This insight is not aligned with the specific performance deficiency attributes defined in IMC 0305 and, as such, the inspectors have not assigned a cross-cutting aspect to this finding. (Section 4OA2.1.c |
Site: | Salem |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000272/2009007 Section 4OA2 |
Date counted | Sep 30, 2009 (2009Q3) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
Inspectors (proximate) | R Powell H Balian J Ambrosini J Hawkins |
INPO aspect | |
' | |
Finding - Salem - IR 05000272/2009007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Salem) @ 2009Q3
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||