05000440/FIN-2010007-02
From kanterella
Revision as of 17:47, 8 October 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Failure to Follow Procedure when Completing Regulatory Applicability Form for a New WARF, RISB, and OSSC Procedure |
Description | The inspectors determined that the failure to perform a 10 CFR 50.59 screening was contrary to procedure NOBP-LP-4003A and was a performance deficiency. Specifically, the determination that new procedure HPI-K0009 was a managerial or administrative change did not comply with the procedure. As a result, the 10 CFR 50.59 screening was not performed and the differences in the procedure requirements with the design basis and USAR requirements were not identified and evaluated. The finding was determined to be more than minor because it was associated with the Public Radiation Safety Cornerstone attribute of program/process and affected the cornerstone objective to ensure adequate protection of public health and safety from exposure to radioactive materials released into the public domain as a result of routine civilian nuclear reactor operation. Specifically, no compensatory radiological monitoring was in place to assess the dose from WARF building effluents. The inspectors determined the finding could be evaluated using the SDP in accordance with IMC 0609, Significance Determination Process, Appendix D, Public Radiation Safety, dated February 12, 2008, to assess its significance. The inspectors determined that the finding did not involve radioactive material control, there was not a substantial failure to implement the radiological effluent program, and public dose was less than the criteria in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, and 10 CFR 20.1301. Consequently, the inspectors concluded that the finding was of very low safety-significance (Green). This finding is associated with a cross-cutting aspect in the resources component of the human performance cross-cutting area because the licensee did not ensure complete, accurate, and up-to-date design documentation and procedures were available. Specifically, there were eleven instances where issues related to operating the WARF, RISB, and OSSC outside of their design basis were identified since 2000 and no controls to correct these issues were developed until 2010, when a procedure was issued. |
Site: | Perry |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000440/2010007 Section 4OA2 |
Date counted | Dec 31, 2010 (2010Q4) |
Type: | Finding: Green |
cornerstone | Pr Safety |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
Inspectors (proximate) | A Dunlop J Jandovitz C Brown M Phalen J Cameron T Hartman |
CCA | H.7, Documentation |
INPO aspect | WP.3 |
' | |
Finding - Perry - IR 05000440/2010007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Perry) @ 2010Q4
Self-Identified List (Perry)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||