05000440/FIN-2010006-01
From kanterella
Revision as of 16:46, 8 October 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
|---|---|
| Title | Failure to Effectively Manage, Prioritize and Disposition Numerous Operations Procedure DCR Notifications |
| Description | The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance and associated NCV of Technical Specification 5.4.1.a for the licensees failure to maintain written procedures covering General Plant Operating Procedures, Procedures for Startup, Operation and Shutdown of Safety-Related BWR [Boiling Water Reactor] Systems, and Procedures for Combating Emergencies and Other Significant Events, as required by the Technical Specifications. Specifically, the licensee failed to effectively manage, prioritize and disposition numerous long-standing design change requests (DCRs). The DCRs documented procedure changes to be incorporated into Operations procedures that were used during plant operation activities under normal, abnormal, emergency and shutdown conditions. The licensee entered this finding into their corrective action program (i.e., condition report (CR) 10-79187) and performed a cause analysis evaluation to identify the causes and determine potential impact on plant operations. The finding was more than minor in accordance with IMC 0612, Appendix B because the finding was associated with the procedure quality attribute of the mitigating systems cornerstone and affected the cornerstones objective of ensuring the availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent undesirable consequences (i.e., core damage). Specifically, the licensees failure to maintain the Operations procedures up-to-date could have complicated and prolonged the operators response during plant operation activities under abnormal and emergency conditions, thereby delaying the mitigating systems availability to mitigate the consequences of a design basis accident. The finding was of very low safety significance based on a Phase 1 screening in accordance with IMC 0609, Significance Determination Process, Attachment 0609.04, Phase 1 - Initial Screening and Characterization of Findings, Table 4a. This finding had a cross cutting aspect in the area of human performance, resources because the licensee did not provide complete, accurate, and up-to-date Operations procedures to plant personnel. Specifically, the licensee failed to effectively manage, prioritize and disposition numerous long-standing DCRs. The DCRs documented procedure changes to be incorporated into Operations procedures that were used during plant operation activities under normal, abnormal, emergency and shutdown conditions. |
| Site: | Perry  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000440/2010006 Section 1R17 |
| Date counted | Sep 30, 2010 (2010Q3) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.17 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | Z Falevits R Daley R Langstaff G Hausman L Jones |
| CCA | H.7, Documentation |
| INPO aspect | WP.3 |
| ' | |
Finding - Perry - IR 05000440/2010006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Perry) @ 2010Q3
Self-Identified List (Perry)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||