05000387/FIN-2011007-02
From kanterella
Revision as of 15:06, 30 September 2017 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Finding | |
---|---|
Title | Failure to Establish Adequate Test Acceptance Criteria for Fire Pump Performance Testing |
Description | The team identified non-cited violations of Susquehanna Unit 1 Operating License Condition 2.C.(6) and Unit 2 Operating License Condition 2.C.(3) for the failure to implement all provisions of the approved Fire Protection Program. Specifically, PPL established acceptance criteria in the fire pump performance tests that was nonconservative compared to design basis requirements and the test acceptance criteria was insufficient to demonstrate that the fire pumps could provide sufficient pump pressure to satisfy required sprinkler system hydraulic needs. PPL performed an operability evaluation that determined the fire pumps were capable of performing their intended functions based on predicted flow rates and current pump degradation. The team determined the failure to establish acceptance criteria in annual pump performance tests that demonstrated the pumps would perform satisfactorily in service was a performance deficiency. This issue was more than minor because it was similar to NRC Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0612, Appendix E, Examples of Minor Issues, Example 3.k, which states that an analysis to verify the adequacy of design contained incorrect assumptions. The example concludes that the issue is more than minor if the error resulted in a condition where there was a reasonable doubt on the operability of the component. For this issue, a knowledgeable engineer could not determine whether pump performance was adequate to satisfy design needs based on a review of the existing pump test results, hydraulic analysis, and associated design details without performing additional complex analysis and preliminary calculations. The team performed a Phase 1 Significance Determination Process screening, in accordance with NRC IMC 0609, Appendix F, Fire Protection Significance Determination Process. This finding affected the fixed fire protection systems category, and was screened to very low safety significance because the affected sprinkler systems were determined to have a low degradation rating. This finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution, Corrective Action Program because annual fire pump performance testing in 2009 and 2010 identified significant pump degradation, but PPL failed to initiate a condition report or correct the condition. |
Site: | Susquehanna |
---|---|
Report | IR 05000387/2011007 Section 1R05 |
Date counted | Jun 30, 2011 (2011Q2) |
Type: | NCV: Green |
cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
Identified by: | NRC identified |
Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.05 |
Inspectors (proximate) | W Schmidt K Young J Rogge J Richmond L Scholl |
CCA | P.1, Identification |
INPO aspect | PI.1 |
' | |
Finding - Susquehanna - IR 05000387/2011007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finding List (Susquehanna) @ 2011Q2
Self-Identified List (Susquehanna)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||