Press Release-I-06-025, NRC Proposes $3,250 Civil Penalty Against Firm in Puerto Rico for Loss of Portable Nuclear Gauge

From kanterella
Revision as of 09:19, 31 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Press Release-I-06-025: NRC Proposes $3,250 Civil Penalty Against Firm in Puerto Rico for Loss of Portable Nuclear Gauge
ML061080251
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/18/2006
From:
Office of Public Affairs Region I
To:
Category:Press Release
References
Press Release-I-06-025
Download: ML061080251 (2)


Text

NRC NEWS U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Office of Public Affairs, Region I 475 Allendale Road, King of Prussia, Pa.www.nrc.gov No. I-06-025 April 18, 2006Contact:Diane Screnci, 610/337-5330 E-mail: opa1@nrc.govNeil Sheehan, 610/337-5331NRC PROPOSES $3,250 CIVIL PENALTY AGAINST FIRM IN PUERTO RICOFOR LOSS OF PORTABLE NUCLEAR GAUGE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed a $3,250 fine against a San Juan, PuertoRico-based company for violations associated with the loss of a portable nuclear gauge in August 2005.

The gauge, which contains radioactive material, is used for industrial purposes such as measuring soil density. On Aug. 16, 2005, an employee of GEO-EXPLOR, Inc., was using the gauge at atemporary job site in Dorado, Puerto Rico. When finished with the work, the employee placed the device in the open bed of a pickup truck but failed to secure it to the vehicle or to close the tailgate.

After traveling for less than a mile on a public highway, the driver realized the container holding the gauge had fallen off the truck. Although the employee retraced his route, he was unable to locate the device. It was subsequently recovered - intact and undamaged - by a member of the public, then stored in a commercial warehouse before being returned to the company on Aug. 22, 2005. Based on an inspection conducted on Nov. 15, 2005, the NRC has identified threeviolations of agency requirements with regard to the event. Specifically, a company employee failed to maintain control and constant surveillance of the gauge when it was lost on the highway and kept in the commercial warehouse; the employee failed to use two independent physical controls to secure the container in which the gauge was being transported even though there were two available chains in the truck's bed; and the employee placed the case holding the gauge in the truck bed without securing it in any way and without closing the vehicle's tailgate.

"Although the gauge was locked in the shielded condition and it was in a locked transport case at the time it was found by the member of the public, these violations are of concern to the NRC because (1) the gauge was in the public domain for approximately 6 days, and (2) such sources can result in unintended radiation exposure to an individual if the (radioactive) source is not in the shielded position," NRC Region I Administrator Samuel J. Collins wrote in a letter to GEO-EXPLOR regarding the enforcement action. The company was given an opportunity to respond to the apparent violations identified bythe NRC by either submitting a written response or attending a predecisional enforcement conference.

In a letter dated March 6, GEO-EXPLOR wrote that it agreed with the information regarding theapparent violations and described steps it had taken to prevent a recurrence, including retraining its entire staff on gauge use and transportation. The NRC concluded that the corrective actions were comprehensive. However, a civil penalty was proposed consistent with the NRC policy for cases involving the loss of such materials. The firm is required to provide the NRC with a written reply to the enforcement actionwithin 30 days. #