Semantic search

This page or action requires JavaScript to work. Please enable JavaScript in your browser or use a browser where it is supported, so that functionality can be provided as requested. For further assistance, please have a look at the noscript help page.

Options | Search Clear all entries |

Condition

Printout selection

Options

Parameters [+]

limit:

The maximum number of results to return

offset:

The offset of the first result

link:

Show values as links

headers:

Display the headers/property names

mainlabel:

The label to give to the main page name

intro:

The text to display before the query results, if there are any

outro:

The text to display after the query results, if there are any

searchlabel:

Text for continuing the search

default:

The text to display if there are no query results

class:

An additional CSS class to set for the table

transpose:

Display table headers vertically and results horizontally

sep:

The separator between results

prefix:

Control display of namespace in printouts

Sort options

Delete

Add sorting condition

ResultCodeDebugExtra

To embed this query inline into a wiki page use the code below.

{{#ask: [[Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR]] [[Site::Seabrook||05000000||Shoreham]]
 |?Issue date
 |?Title
 |?Topic
 |format=table
 |limit=50
 |offset=0
 |sort=
 |order=asc
 |mainlabel=
 |searchlabel=[Table view]
}}

Results 1 – 50 previous 50 20 50 100 250 500 next 50

JSON CSV RSS RDF

Query log

{
    "query_string": "[[Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES &amp; PETITIONS FOR]] [[Site::Seabrook||05000000||Shoreham]]",
    "query_source": "SMWSQLStore",
    "query_time": "0.5986",
    "from_cache": false
}

	Issue date	Title	Topic
B12706, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev of Backfitting Process for Power Reactors	13 October 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Rev of Backfitting Process for Power Reactors	Backfit
B12870, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Leakage Testing of Containments to Permit Use of Mass Point Method as Alternative Method for Calculating Containment Leakage Rates	31 March 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Leakage Testing of Containments to Permit Use of Mass Point Method as Alternative Method for Calculating Containment Leakage Rates
B12891, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcement of Inspector on Site	18 April 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcement of Inspector on Site
B13113, Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel	8 March 1989	Comment on Proposed Rev 3 to Reg Guide 1.9, Selection, Design,Qualification,Testing & Reliability of Diesel Generator Units.... Util Recommends Rule Be Revised to Incorporate Addl Flexibility in Considering Age of Diesel	Probabilistic Risk Assessment
B13136, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague	27 February 1989	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Proposed Rule on Maint Will Not Improve Maint in Plants Nor Improve Safety or Reliability of Plants.Proposed Rule Much Too Vague	Backfit
B13367, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements	20 September 1989	Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR30,40,50,60,70,72 & 150 Re Preserving Free Flow of Info to Commission.Nrc Made Wise Choice to Not Impose Any Obligation on Private Parties to Include Affirmative Statement in Employment Agreements
ELV-00674, Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement	7 July 1989	Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50,72 & 170 Re Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites. 10CFR72.6(c) Should Be Revised to Provide for Storage W/O ISFSI Requirement
ELV-00679, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626	5 July 1989	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Acceptance of Products Purchased for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Structures,Sys & Components. Agrees W/Numarc Comments Provided to NRC on 890626
JPN-87-051, Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl	28 September 1987	Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1150, Reactor Risk Ref Document. Reduced Uncertainty in Risk Assessment Found to Be Significant W/Respect to NUREG-1150.NUREG Also Does Not Consider Value of Operator Actions.Addl Comments Encl	Reactor Vessel Water Level Probabilistic Risk Assessment Backfit Fatality
JPN-87-053, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection	15 October 1987	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Revising Backfitting Process for Power Reactors.Minor Alterations Urged Re Conditions Under Which Backfit Needed to Assure Adequate Protection	Backfit
JPN-87-062, Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex	31 December 1987	Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR4,11,25,30,31,32,34,35,40,50, 60,61,70,71,73,74,75,95 & 110 Re Retention Period for Records.Proposed Changes Ineffective in Reducing Record Vol & Rule Remains Inconsistent & Complex
JPN-88-002, Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed	25 January 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods.Concerns Re Schedule as License Amend Expressed
JPN-88-015, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site	18 April 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Licensee Announcements of Inspectors.Rule Includes Requirement Contrary to Mgt Notification Practices.Rule Should Clarify Length of Time Applicable Once Inspector Arrives on Site
JPN-88-063, Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments	18 November 1988	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program.Util Has Constitutional Concerns Re Proposed Random Testing Which Should Be Fully Addressed Prior to Rule Being Promulgated.Endorses NUMARC & EEI Comments	Fitness for Duty
JPN-89-008, Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants	27 February 1989	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants	Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance Exemption Request Backfit
ML17265A807	6 October 1998	Comment on Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Util Endorses Comments Being Provided by NEI on Behalf of Nuclear Industry
ML18093A633	1 February 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Policy Statement on Integrated Schedules for Implementation of Plant Mods
ML20011E486	7 February 1990	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR71 Re Compatibility of Pu Air Transport Regulations W/Iaea Stds.Supports EEI-UWASTE/NUMARC Comments to Be Provided to NRC by 900209
ML20045F784	18 June 1993	Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR55 Re Exam Procedures for Operator Licensing.Opposes Rule
ML20057F718	13 September 1993	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercise Requirements
ML20058E015	14 November 1993	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Exemptions in Accident Insurance for Nuclear Power Plants Prematurely Shut Down
ML20071H076	29 June 1994	Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-60 Which Requested That NRC Change Frequency That License Conducts Independent Reviews of Emergency Preparedness Program from Annually to Biannually
ML20077M743	27 December 1994	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Lower Power Operations for Nuclear Reactors
ML20078N028	30 November 1994	Comment Supporting NRC Initiative to Issue GL to Reconsider Positions Re Certain Security Measures to Protect Against Internal Threats at Npp.Supports Comments Presented by NEI
ML20093G454	18 October 1995	Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 51 Re Decommissioning Procedures for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20141G969	3 July 1997	Comment Opposing NUREG-1606 Re Proposed Regulatory Guidance Related to Implementation of 10CFR50.59.Licensee Supports Approach Proposed by Nuclear Energy Inst
ML20147C319	6 January 1988	Comment Opposing SRP Section 3.6.3 of NUREG-0800.Utils Endorse Comments by Nuclear Util Group on Equipment Qualification	Weld Overlay
ML20147G355	5 February 1988	Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-0654,FEMA-REP-1,Rev 1,Suppl 1. Proposed Rule Change Jeopardizes Lives of Millions by Licensing Seabrook & Shoreham
ML20147G413	24 February 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Suppl 1 to Rev 1 to NUREG-0654, FEMA-REP-1.Document Should Be Immediately Withdrawn Pending Outcome of Numerous Court Challenges to Rule Change
ML20147G866	26 February 1988	Comment Opposing NUREG-0654/FEMA REP-1,Rev 1,Suppl 1 Re Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.Suppl Illegal as Interim Document & Relies Upon Unrealistic Assumptions.Suppl Should Be Rejected
ML20148H932	11 December 1987	Comment Opposing Serious Procedural Defects in NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1,Rev 1,Suppl 1, Criteria for Util Offsite Planning & Preparedness,Draft Rept for Interim Use & Comment	Biofouling
ML20148N056	19 June 1997	Comment on Proposed Supplement to NRC Bulletin 96-001, Control Rod Insertion Problems. North Atlantic Endorses Concerns & Considerations Presented on Topic by NEI, Westinghouse & Wog,Specifically Control Rod Testing	Shutdown Margin Grace period Backfit
ML20150A900	4 July 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology.Further Use of Subj Technology for ECCS Would Reduce Safety Assurances & Safety Benefits.Experience Shows That pipe-thinning Progresses Faster than Expected
ML20150A905	30 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re leak-before-break Technology for safety-related Equipment.Nrc Reliance on leak-before-break Is Irrational Response to Very Real Safety Problem.Nrc Should Implement Mandatory Piping Insp	Earthquake
ML20150B080	23 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Changes Would Significantly Weaken Level of Public Protection	Chernobyl
ML20150B692	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B697	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B704	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B711	22 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B725	22 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Existing Safety Requirements Already Criminally Threadbare
ML20150B734	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B740	22 June 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B748	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B768	21 June 1988	Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations.Low Power Operation Poses No Threat to Public Safety
ML20150B770	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B785	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B792	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B800	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B827	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20150B829	6 June 1988	Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations

Semantic search

Query log

Navigation menu

Search