Semantic search

Jump to navigation Jump to search
 Start dateReporting criterionEvent description
05000458/LER-1985-006, Forwards LER 85-006-00 & LER 85-007-0015 October 1985
05000458/LER-1985-059, Advises That Supplemental Info for LERs 85-039 & 85-024 Contained in LER 85-059,Rev 1 Submitted by Util27 February 1987
05000458/LER-1985-061, Corrected Ltr Forwarding LER 85-061-00.Tracking Number Changed to RBG-2304124 January 1986
05000458/LER-1985-062, Corrected Ltr Forwarding LER 85-062-00.Tracking Number Changed to RBG-2304225 January 1986
05000458/LER-1986-009, Corrected LER 86-009-00:on 860114,radwaste Liquid Effluent Monitor Sample Pump Not Started During Radioactive Liquid Discharge.Caused by Miscommunication & Procedure Ambiguities.Procedures Revised13 February 1986
05000458/LER-1986-060, Forwards Info Re Items Identified Subsequent to 861110 Conference Re Insp Rept 50-458/86-36.Addl Info Available in LER 86-60,submitted on 86111313 November 1986
05000458/LER-1987-001, Corrected LER 87-001-00:on 870108,discovered That Main Plant & Fuel Bldg Exhaust Radiation Monitor Particulate & Iodine Samplers Isolated Since 870107.Caused by Operator Error. Operator Aid Issued9 February 1987
05000458/LER-1987-008, Advises That Addl Info Re Corrective Actions Noted in Rev 1 to LER 87-008 Wil Be Submitted by 88041511 March 1988
05000458/LER-1987-014, Forwards LER 87-014,Rev 1,correcting Date of Occurrence from 870707 to 87070422 February 1989
05000458/LER-1989-010, Forwards Suppl 4 to LER 89-010 Re Fire Barrier Penetration Seals.Completion Date for Reworking or Dispositioning All Deficient Penetration Seals Extended to End of Next Refueling Outage Currently Scheduled to Begin 94041527 December 1993
05000458/LER-1990-005, Provides Corrected Info Re LER 90-005 for Plant.Ler Addressed Situation Offgas Pretreatment Radiation Monitor Setpoint in Tech Spec Table 3.3.7.1-1. Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation Incorrect15 April 1991
05000458/LER-1990-02218 June 1990
05000458/LER-1991-017, Advises That Supplement to LER 91-017 Re Design Discrepancy in Wiring Diagram from Two Hydrogen Sys Mixing Valves Delayed from 911201 to 911226 to Coincide W/Response Date for Notice of Violation & Imposition of Civil Penalty27 November 1991
05000458/LER-1991-018, Forwards LER 91-018-01.Rev Defers Installation of Mod Request MR 87-0576 to Locate Indication & Annunication for Div I & II Isolations on Control Room Boards as Opposed to Back Panels3 September 1992
05000458/LER-1992-004, Forwards LER 92-004-01.Rev Submitted to Include Missed Surveillances on Valve 1SWP*AOVF051A Overlooked in Original LER Submittal22 December 1992
05000458/LER-1993-003, Notifies Staff Implementation of Updated Work Control Program Delayed Until 931031 Re Response to Insp Rept 50-458/93-11 & LER 93-00316 September 1993
05000458/LER-1993-006, Provides Addl Info Re Failure of MSIV to Close Re LER 93-006.Atwood & Morrill Has Participated in Corrective Actions by Designing & Mfg 8 MSIV Mod Kits to Be Installed by Util29 September 1993
05000458/LER-1993-01016 August 1993
05000458/LER-1993-01226 August 1993
05000458/LER-1993-01523 August 1993
05000458/LER-1993-01627 August 1993
05000458/LER-1994-001, Forwards Suppl to LER 94-001 Re Deficiencies in Fire Barrier Separation22 December 1994
05000458/LER-1995-004, Responds to NRC Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-458/95-03 on 950326-0506.Corrective Actions:Door Returned to an Acceptable Configuration.Long Term Corrective Actions Discussed in LER 95-004-01,dtd 95062830 June 1995
05000458/LER-1996-014, Forwards LER 96-014-01,incorporating Changes Listed17 April 1997
05000458/LER-1997-004, LAR 98-08 to License NPF-47,changing Specific Gravity Acceptance Criteria for Div III Battery,Re TS 3.8.6, Battery Cell Parameters. Condition Leading to Change Was Described in LER 97-004 & Insp Rept 50-458/97-1323 September 1998
05000458/LER-1997-010, Forwards LER 97-010-00 IAW 10CFR50.73.Submittal of Suppl Rept Expected When Investigation Is Completed.Submission Date for Suppl Is 98012911 December 1997
05000458/LER-1998-001, Forwards LER 98-001-01 Re Elevated Flow Rates Through Standby Gas Treatment Sys Filter Assembly Units.Commitments Made within Ltr Are in Attachment 230 June 1998
05000458/LER-1998-002, Forwards LER 98-002-01,IAW 10CFR50.73.Commitments Made within Ltr,Encl15 July 1998
05000458/LER-1998-003, Forwards LER 98-003-02,revising Previous Rept Dtd 981005, Submitted to Clarify Reported Condition & to Incorporate Final Root Cause Analysis & Corrective Action Plan for Event.Complete Rev & No Change Bars Used in Documents9 September 1999
05000458/LER-1998-004, Forwards LER 98-004-00 Addressing Failure to Properly Implement Station Surveillance Test Program.Rept Being Submitted for Industry Review of Generic Applicability11 August 1998
05000458/LER-1999-002, Forwards LER 99-002-01,IAW 10CFR50.73.Supplemental Rept Details Root Cause Analysis for Reported Condition. Commitments in Document Annotated on Commitment Identifier Form,Attachment 115 July 1999
05000458/LER-1999-003, Forwards LER 99-003-00,per 10CFR50.73.Commitments Identified in Rept Are Noted in Attachment 123 April 1999
05000458/LER-1999-005, Forwards LER 99-005-00 IAW 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i).Commitments Identified in LER Are Noted in Attachment 13 May 1999
05000458/LER-1999-006, Forwards LER 99-006-00 Re Unplanned Automatic Standby Svc Water Initiation,Due to Procedure Inadequacy.Commitments Identified in Rept Noted in Attachment 16 May 1999
05000458/LER-1999-007, Forwards LER 99-007-00 IAW 10CFR50.73.Commitments Identified in LER Are Noted in Attachment 110 May 1999
05000458/LER-1999-009, Forwards LER 99-009-00 IAW 10CFR50.73.Commitments Contained in Ltr Are Identified on Commitment Identification Form24 May 1999
05000458/LER-1999-010, Forwards LER 99-010-00 for River Bend Station,Unit 1 IAW 10CFR50.73.Commitments Identified in Rept,Encl28 May 1999
05000458/LER-1999-011, Forwards LER 99-011-00 for River Bend Station,Unit 1,IAW 10CFR50.73.Commitments Identified in Rept,Encl9 June 1999
05000458/LER-1999-012, Forwards LER 99-012-00,IAW 10CFR73.Commitments Contained in Document Identified on Commitment Identification Form21 June 1999
05000458/LER-2003-00822 September 200310 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation

At 10:43 p.m. CDT on September 22, 2003, with the plant operating at approximately 78 percent power, an automatic reactor scram occurred during scheduled testing of the main turbine control valves. The scram signal originated from reactor steam pressure instruments following a malfunction of the main turbine control system which caused the control valves to move toward the closed position.

A containment isolation signal initiated due to the expected reactor low water level alarm, which caused the isolation of the suppression pool cooling system, as designed. This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) as a valid actuation of the reactor protection system and the containment isolation logic circuitry. Modifications are being considered to prevent recurrence of this condition.

Turbine control valve testing has been suspended pending further corrective actions.

This event was of very low safety significance, as the response of the plant to the scram signal was bounded by the safety analysis.

05000458/LER-2006-00627 May 200610 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical SpecificationsOn May 27, 2006, while the unit was operating at 100 percent power, the determination was made that one of the required offsite power supplies to the Division 3 standby switchgear had been inoperable during the recent plant startup on May 13, 2006. A 4160 volt circuit breaker in one of the power supplies to Division 3 was not functional at the time of the plant startup. This condition does not meet the requirements of Technical Specifications Limiting Condition for Operation 3.0.4. In addition, during the investigation, it was determined that the surveillance test procedure that implements Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.1 did not include the verification of the alignment of the offsite power supplies to Division 3. A similar condition was also found to exist for Surveillance Requirement 3.8.1.8. These conditions are being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as operations prohibited by Technical Specifications. The circuit breaker was subsequently repaired and demonstrated to be functional. The Division 3 emergency diesel generator is the safety-related power source for the Division 3 switchgear, and it was operable at the time this condition was discovered. Therefore, this condition was of minimal safety significance.
05000458/LER-2006-00719 October 200610 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation

On October 19, 2006, at approximately 5:57 p.m. CDT, an automatic reactor scram occurred in response to a low water level signal (Level 3) in the reactor vessel. This condition was the result of the inadvertent closure of the motor-operated isolation valves in the main feedwater headers supplying the reactor. These valves closed when part of a chart recorder was accidentally dropped on their control switches. The high pressure core spray system automatically actuated as designed when its reactor water level (Level 2) initiation setpoint was reached. The reactor core isolation cooling system was out of service for planned maintenance. Reactor steam pressure began to decrease as expected, and when pressure reached 849 psig approximately three minutes after the scram, the main steam isolation valves (MSIVs) automatically closed.

The MSIVs closed because the reactor mode switch was not promptly re-positioned as required by scram response procedures. This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) as an automatic actuation of the reactor protection system and the high pressure core system (including the Division 3 diesel generator). Also, primary containment isolation signals actuated as a result of the Level 2 condition and the low reactor steam pressure signal to the MSIVs.

05000458/LER-2007-00321 May 200710 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

On May 21, 2007, a review of industry operating experience (OE) related to emergency diesel generators (DG) found a condition which is not consistent with the assumptions of the River Bend Station (RBS) post-fire safe shutdown analysis. That analysis assumes that the high temperature trips on the Division 1 DG would remain active following a start signal resulting from a loss of offsite power (LOP). This OE review found that when the DG starts following a LOP, non-critical trips (such as high temperature) are bypassed. With the non-critical trips bypassed, the DG will continue to run without sufficient cooling, likely resulting in damage to the engine. It appears that, during past revisions of the safe-shutdown analyses, reviewers did not adequately assess all potential failure modes resulting from multiple spurious actuations. This is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B) as a condition resulting in the plant being in an unanalyzed condition that significantly degrades plant safety.

This condition does not cause the Division 1 DG to be inoperable with respect to its function required in the accident analysis and Technical Specifications. A pre-existing Standing Order that prohibits welding and grinding in the main control room during Modes 1, 2, and 3 was revised to specifically address this condition.

05000458/LER-2007-00526 September 200710 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System ActuationOn September 26, 2007, at 10:42 pm CDT, an unplanned automatic reactor scram occurred while the plant was operating at 100 percent power. At the time of the event, scheduled surveillance testing was in progress for a functional test of the average power range monitor (APRM) channel "A". Part of the test procedure involved the actuation of the Division 1 reactor protection system (RPS) trip circuitry. When this action was taken, 36 reactor control rods ("Group 2" rods) unexpectedly inserted into the core. As the reactor operator was taking actions to respond to this condition, an automatic reactor scram was generated by a low reactor water level (Level 3) signal. This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv) as an automatic actuation of the reactor protection system. The investigation found that a terminal block and wiring had been damaged by overheating due to a loose terminal screw, which had caused a loss of power to the scram valve pilot solenoids on the Group 2 rods. This loss of power was not apparent to the operators, as it occurred in a part of the circuit downstream of the power status lights. The damaged components were repaired, and similar circuits were inspected for loose terminals.
05000458/LER-2009-00329 September 200910 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

On September 29, '2009, at approximately 11:27 a.m. CDT, the main control room operators manually started the low pressure coolant injection function of the residual heat removal (RHR) system in response to a decrease in upper reactor cavity water level. At the time of the event, the plant was in a refueling outage. No handling of irradiated fuel or control blades was in progress.

A Division 1 integrated emergency core cooling system surveillance test was in progress. One of the expected responses was the actuation of the Division 1 primary containment isolation logic. That actuation caused the closure of primary containment isolation valves in various systems, one of which was the service air system.

Among the components being served by the service air system was the main steam line (MSL) plugs in the reactor pressure vessel. The investigation of this event found that the MSL plug in the "A" main steam line was not installed correctly. The mechanical seal had not been completely engaged. In this condition, the backup inflatable seal pressurized by the service.air system was the only barrier keeping water out of that main steam line. When the service air header in the primary containment was depressurized, the seal deflated and began to leak.

This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) as a condition involving the unplanned actuation of an ECCS system.

05000458/LER-2011-00110 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

At 2:34 p.m. CST on January 20, 2011, while the plant was in a refueling outage, standby service water (SSW) pump "C" started automatically during system realignment. The Division 1 SSW subsystem (pumps "A" and "C") was being started to facilitate maintenance on the normal service water system.

When the "A" pump was manually started, the pressure transient caused by the realignment of the motor-operated valves in the system caused a momentary low system pressure, actuating SSW pump "C" automatically. This event resulted from a weakness in the operating procedure, in that the intended system configuration for this operation exceeded the flow capacity for one pump. Actions are being taken to strengthen this and other similar procedures to prevent recurrence. This event is being reported in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) as a condition that resulted in the automatic actuation of the "C" SSW pump.

05000458/LER-2011-00213 February 201110 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical SpecificationsOn February 13, 2011, at approximately 5:00 a.m. CST, during power ascent following a refueling outage, operators found that one channel of main turbine first stage pressure instrumentation was not responding to changing plant parameters. This instrument provides a permissive to the reactor protection system (RPS) to enable a reactor scram signal from main turbine control valve control valve fast closure and main turbine stop valve closure. Also enabled by that permissive is a reactor recirculation pump trip signal initiated by the main turbine stop valve closure. While performing the initial troubleshooting, a maintenance technician discovered that a valve at the affected steam pressure transmitter was closed, isolating it from the system. This valve had apparently been left closed following the calibration of the instrument during the outage. The valve was opened, and the instrumentation channel was declared operable at 5:52 p.m. that day. The signals enabled by this pressure transmitter are required to be operable when reactor power is greater than 40 percent. Reactor power had exceeded 40 percent at approximately 3:24 a.m. that day. This event is being reported as operations prohibited by Technical Specifications in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(i)(B).
05000458/LER-2011-00323 December 201110 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A), System Actuation

On December 23, 2011, at approximately 6:10 a.m. CST, the main turbine tripped unexpectedly, resulting in a reactor scram. The plant was stable at 100 percent power at the time of the event, and no safety-related systems were out of service. Operitors implemented the appropriate response procedures, and began to stabilize reactor vessel pressure and water level. The closure of the turbine control valves resulted in the actuation of at least fifteen of sixteen main steam safety relief valves. A subsequent high reactor water level caused a trip of all three reactor feedwater pumps. As reactor water level lowered back through the normal operating range, operators attempted to restart a feedwater pump, but component malfunctions were encountered on "B" and "C" pumps. The reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) system was manually actuated approximately nine minutes after the scram and injected water into the reactor for approximately two minutes.

The "A" feedwater pump was restored to service approximately one minute after RCIC was initiated. The cause of the turbine trip was a spurious backup over-speed trip resulting from an electrical discharge from the turbine shaft in the vicinity of the EHC turbine speed pickup probe. The cause of the electrical discharge was due to a failure of the shaft grounding system. The plant responded as designed, and no emergency core cooling system actuation setpoints were exceeded. This event is being reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv)(A) as a condition that resulted in the automatic actuation of the reactor protection system (RPS).

05000458/LER-2012-00410 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical SpecificationsOn October 6, 2012, while the plant was operating at 100 percent power, it was discovered that one of the safety-related fans in the standby service water cooling tower would not start from the remote shutdown panel. The initial investigation determined that the failure was due to incorrect maintenance that had been performed on May 3, 2011, when a relay in the fan motor breaker was miswired during re-installation after bench testing. This condition caused the fan to have been inoperable since that time with respect to the function of the Remote Shutdown System, as governed by Technical Specification 3.3.3.2. The investigation of this event found that control of lifted leads and application of post-maintenance testing requirements were ineffective. Revisions to the applicable maintenance procedures have been planned / completed to address the causes of this event. This event is being reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as operations prohibited by technical specifications.
05000458/LER-2013-0012 March 201310 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical SpecificationsOn March 2, 2013, at approximately 1448 CST, with the plant in a refueling outage, maintenance on the reactor recirculation system was commenced without taking the required actions to comply with the applicable Technical Specifications. This maintenance constituted operations with a potential to drain the reactor vessel, and the required action for such an activity is restoration of the integrity of primary containment. This action was not taken, and the provisions of NRC Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 11-003 (Rev. 1) were instead invoked. The maintenance was completed and compliance with Technical Specifications was restored at 0830 CST on March 7. This event is being reported in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B) as operations prohibited by Technical Specifications, as additionally specified by the Enforcement Guidance Memorandum.