|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARL-2023-131, Subsequent License Renewal Application - Second Annual Update2023-09-28028 September 2023 Subsequent License Renewal Application - Second Annual Update L-2023-076, In-Service Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report (OAR-1)2023-07-11011 July 2023 In-Service Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report (OAR-1) L-2023-028, and Point Beach Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Reporting of Changes to, or Errors in Emergency Core Cooling System Models or Applications2023-03-27027 March 2023 and Point Beach Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Reporting of Changes to, or Errors in Emergency Core Cooling System Models or Applications L-2023-009, Owner'S Activity Report2023-01-31031 January 2023 Owner'S Activity Report ML22227A0532022-08-15015 August 2022 Biological Opinion for the Continued Operation of St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant ML22124A0112022-04-30030 April 2022 Scoping Summary Report - Final L-2022-046, Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision - Documents WCAP-18623-P/NP Revision 1 Submittal2022-04-13013 April 2022 Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision - Documents WCAP-18623-P/NP Revision 1 Submittal L-2022-015, Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld - RAI2022-01-14014 January 2022 Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld - RAI L-2022-011, Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld2022-01-12012 January 2022 Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld ML22010A0942022-01-0404 January 2022 Trp 29 St. Lucie SLRA - Tank Breakout L-2021-178, Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes2021-11-0808 November 2021 Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes L-2021-142, Westinghouse Report LTR-REA-21-1-NP, Revision 1, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Subsequent License Renewal: Unit 1 Reactor Vessel, Vessel Support, and Bioshield Concrete Exposure Data, May 26, 20212021-08-0303 August 2021 Westinghouse Report LTR-REA-21-1-NP, Revision 1, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Subsequent License Renewal: Unit 1 Reactor Vessel, Vessel Support, and Bioshield Concrete Exposure Data, May 26, 2021 ML19252A4002019-09-0909 September 2019 FPL to NRC, Notification of Smalltooth Sawfish Capture at St. Lucie L-2019-010, Proposed Alternative for the Use of Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques in Lieu of Radiography for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds2019-03-19019 March 2019 Proposed Alternative for the Use of Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques in Lieu of Radiography for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds ML18096B3952018-04-0606 April 2018 Exhibit III Estimate of Construction Costs and Exhibit IV Technical Qualifications of Contractors ML18088B1952018-03-29029 March 2018 Hutchinson Island Plant Units 1 and 2 - Chapter 9, Auxiliary Systems and Chapter 10, Steam and Power Conversion System ML18088B1942018-03-29029 March 2018 Hutchinson Island Plant Units 1 and 2 - Chapter 11, Radioactive Waste Management System, Chapter 12, Radiation Protection, and Chapter 13, Conduct of Operations ML18088A0942018-03-29029 March 2018 Unit II Plants ECCS Performance Results L-2017-173, Environmental Protection Plan Report, Unusual or Important Environmental Event - Turtle Mortality - 09/11/2017 Event2017-09-28028 September 2017 Environmental Protection Plan Report, Unusual or Important Environmental Event - Turtle Mortality - 09/11/2017 Event L-2018-081, Kld Engineering, Pc - 2017 Population Update Analysis2017-09-20020 September 2017 Kld Engineering, Pc - 2017 Population Update Analysis L-2017-117, Submittal of SL2-23 Outage, Owner'S Activity Report, Form OAR-12017-06-20020 June 2017 Submittal of SL2-23 Outage, Owner'S Activity Report, Form OAR-1 L-2018-015, Plan of Study 316(b) Implementation2017-04-28028 April 2017 Plan of Study 316(b) Implementation L-2017-015, PWROG-15105-NP PA-MSC-1288 PWR Rv Internals Cold-Work Assessment, Materials Committee.2016-04-30030 April 2016 PWROG-15105-NP PA-MSC-1288 PWR Rv Internals Cold-Work Assessment, Materials Committee. ML16084A6162016-03-24024 March 2016 Submittal of Biological Opinion for the Continued Operation of St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 in St. Lucie County, Florida ML16063A0072016-02-26026 February 2016 Participation in Additional Work Under the Support for Applicant Action Items 1, 2, and 7 from the Final Safety Evaluation on MRP-227, Revision 0 PA-MSC-0983 R2 Cafeteria Task 8 and Acceptance Criteria for Measurement Of.. ML15352A0532016-01-0707 January 2016 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) Seismic Hazard Revaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights L-2015-297, Status of Required Actions for EA-12-049 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events, and Submittal of Site FLEX Final Integrated Plan2015-12-10010 December 2015 Status of Required Actions for EA-12-049 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events, and Submittal of Site FLEX Final Integrated Plan L-2015-300, ANP-3352NP, Revision 1, Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report.2015-11-30030 November 2015 ANP-3352NP, Revision 1, Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report. ML15314A1602015-10-29029 October 2015 St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2 - License Renewal Commitment, Submittal of Pressurizer Surge Line Welds Inspection Program L-2015-221, Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes2015-10-16016 October 2015 Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes ML15240A1542015-09-0808 September 2015 Staff Observations of Sump Strainer Head Loss Testing at Alden Laboratory for Generic Safety Issue 191 L-2015-206, ANP-3428NP, Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 2 Fuel Transition: Response to SNPB-RAI-1, Attachment 4 to L-2015-2062015-07-31031 July 2015 ANP-3428NP, Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 2 Fuel Transition: Response to SNPB-RAI-1, Attachment 4 to L-2015-206 L-2015-177, Fuel Transition Small Break LOCA Summary Report, ANP-3345NP, Revision 12015-06-30030 June 2015 Fuel Transition Small Break LOCA Summary Report, ANP-3345NP, Revision 1 L-2015-143, Status of Required Actions for EA-12-049 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events2015-05-14014 May 2015 Status of Required Actions for EA-12-049 Order Modifying Licenses with Regard to Requirements for Mitigation Strategies for Beyond-Design-Basis External Events L-2015-272, 1301103.401, Revision 0, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of St. Lucie Surge Line Welds Using ASME Code Section XI, Appendix L, May 20152015-05-0808 May 2015 1301103.401, Revision 0, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of St. Lucie Surge Line Welds Using ASME Code Section XI, Appendix L, May 2015 L-2016-052, TN-5696-00-02, Revision 0, Technical Note Assessment of Laboratory PWSCC Crack Growth Rate Data Compiled for Alloys 690, 52, and 152 with Regard to Factors of Improvement (Foi) Versus Alloys 600 and 182.2015-03-31031 March 2015 TN-5696-00-02, Revision 0, Technical Note Assessment of Laboratory PWSCC Crack Growth Rate Data Compiled for Alloys 690, 52, and 152 with Regard to Factors of Improvement (Foi) Versus Alloys 600 and 182. L-2015-091, ANP-3396NP, Revision 0, Fuel Transition Supplemental Information to Support the LAR2015-03-31031 March 2015 ANP-3396NP, Revision 0, Fuel Transition Supplemental Information to Support the LAR L-2015-093, Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light Water Nuclear Power Reactors 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report2015-03-24024 March 2015 Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light Water Nuclear Power Reactors 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report ML15083A2642015-03-10010 March 2015 St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2 - Submittal of Revision 0 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report L-2015-048, St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2 - Submittal of Revision 0 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report2015-03-10010 March 2015 St. Lucie, Units 1 and 2 - Submittal of Revision 0 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report L-2015-048, to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Cover Page to Page 1092015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Cover Page to Page 109 L-2015-048, to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Table 2-1 Through Figure 4-92015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Table 2-1 Through Figure 4-9 L-2015-048, to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Figure 4-10 Through the End2015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Figure 4-10 Through the End ML15083A2652015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Table 2-1 Through Figure 4-9 ML15083A2662015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Figure 4-10 Through the End L-2014-366, ANP-3352NP, Revision 0, St. Luice, Unit 2, Fuel Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report2014-12-31031 December 2014 ANP-3352NP, Revision 0, St. Luice, Unit 2, Fuel Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report ML14338A5552014-12-0404 December 2014 NRC-2013-TN3079-NRC 2014 St. Lucie License Renewal ML14338A5542014-12-0404 December 2014 NRC-2013- TN2986-NRC 2014 St. Lucie L-2014-125, Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes2014-05-0606 May 2014 Report of 10 CFR 50.59 Plant Changes ML13360A2022013-12-12012 December 2013 EPA Echo Report Martin County, Fl 2023-09-28
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARL-2022-046, Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision - Documents WCAP-18623-P/NP Revision 1 Submittal2022-04-13013 April 2022 Subsequent License Renewal Application Revision - Documents WCAP-18623-P/NP Revision 1 Submittal L-2022-015, Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld - RAI2022-01-14014 January 2022 Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld - RAI L-2022-011, Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld2022-01-12012 January 2022 Relief Request Number 20 - Request for an Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code for Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Housing 27 Canopy Seal Weld L-2021-142, Westinghouse Report LTR-REA-21-1-NP, Revision 1, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Subsequent License Renewal: Unit 1 Reactor Vessel, Vessel Support, and Bioshield Concrete Exposure Data, May 26, 20212021-08-0303 August 2021 Westinghouse Report LTR-REA-21-1-NP, Revision 1, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Subsequent License Renewal: Unit 1 Reactor Vessel, Vessel Support, and Bioshield Concrete Exposure Data, May 26, 2021 L-2019-010, Proposed Alternative for the Use of Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques in Lieu of Radiography for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds2019-03-19019 March 2019 Proposed Alternative for the Use of Encoded Phased Array Ultrasonic Examination Techniques in Lieu of Radiography for Ferritic and Austenitic Welds ML18096B3952018-04-0606 April 2018 Exhibit III Estimate of Construction Costs and Exhibit IV Technical Qualifications of Contractors ML18088B1942018-03-29029 March 2018 Hutchinson Island Plant Units 1 and 2 - Chapter 11, Radioactive Waste Management System, Chapter 12, Radiation Protection, and Chapter 13, Conduct of Operations ML18088B1952018-03-29029 March 2018 Hutchinson Island Plant Units 1 and 2 - Chapter 9, Auxiliary Systems and Chapter 10, Steam and Power Conversion System ML18088A0942018-03-29029 March 2018 Unit II Plants ECCS Performance Results L-2018-081, Kld Engineering, Pc - 2017 Population Update Analysis2017-09-20020 September 2017 Kld Engineering, Pc - 2017 Population Update Analysis L-2018-015, Plan of Study 316(b) Implementation2017-04-28028 April 2017 Plan of Study 316(b) Implementation L-2017-015, PWROG-15105-NP PA-MSC-1288 PWR Rv Internals Cold-Work Assessment, Materials Committee.2016-04-30030 April 2016 PWROG-15105-NP PA-MSC-1288 PWR Rv Internals Cold-Work Assessment, Materials Committee. ML16084A6162016-03-24024 March 2016 Submittal of Biological Opinion for the Continued Operation of St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 in St. Lucie County, Florida ML16063A0072016-02-26026 February 2016 Participation in Additional Work Under the Support for Applicant Action Items 1, 2, and 7 from the Final Safety Evaluation on MRP-227, Revision 0 PA-MSC-0983 R2 Cafeteria Task 8 and Acceptance Criteria for Measurement Of.. L-2015-300, ANP-3352NP, Revision 1, Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report.2015-11-30030 November 2015 ANP-3352NP, Revision 1, Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report. L-2015-206, ANP-3428NP, Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 2 Fuel Transition: Response to SNPB-RAI-1, Attachment 4 to L-2015-2062015-07-31031 July 2015 ANP-3428NP, Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 2 Fuel Transition: Response to SNPB-RAI-1, Attachment 4 to L-2015-206 L-2015-177, Fuel Transition Small Break LOCA Summary Report, ANP-3345NP, Revision 12015-06-30030 June 2015 Fuel Transition Small Break LOCA Summary Report, ANP-3345NP, Revision 1 L-2015-272, 1301103.401, Revision 0, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of St. Lucie Surge Line Welds Using ASME Code Section XI, Appendix L, May 20152015-05-0808 May 2015 1301103.401, Revision 0, Flaw Tolerance Evaluation of St. Lucie Surge Line Welds Using ASME Code Section XI, Appendix L, May 2015 L-2016-052, TN-5696-00-02, Revision 0, Technical Note Assessment of Laboratory PWSCC Crack Growth Rate Data Compiled for Alloys 690, 52, and 152 with Regard to Factors of Improvement (Foi) Versus Alloys 600 and 182.2015-03-31031 March 2015 TN-5696-00-02, Revision 0, Technical Note Assessment of Laboratory PWSCC Crack Growth Rate Data Compiled for Alloys 690, 52, and 152 with Regard to Factors of Improvement (Foi) Versus Alloys 600 and 182. L-2015-091, ANP-3396NP, Revision 0, Fuel Transition Supplemental Information to Support the LAR2015-03-31031 March 2015 ANP-3396NP, Revision 0, Fuel Transition Supplemental Information to Support the LAR L-2015-093, Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light Water Nuclear Power Reactors 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report2015-03-24024 March 2015 Acceptance Criteria for Emergency Core Cooling Systems for Light Water Nuclear Power Reactors 10 CFR 50.46 Annual Report L-2015-048, to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Cover Page to Page 1092015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Cover Page to Page 109 L-2015-048, to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Table 2-1 Through Figure 4-92015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Table 2-1 Through Figure 4-9 L-2015-048, to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Figure 4-10 Through the End2015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Figure 4-10 Through the End ML15083A2652015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Table 2-1 Through Figure 4-9 ML15083A2662015-02-0606 February 2015 to FPL-072-PR-002, Flooding Hazards Reevaluation Report for St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 & 2. Figure 4-10 Through the End L-2014-366, ANP-3352NP, Revision 0, St. Luice, Unit 2, Fuel Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report2014-12-31031 December 2014 ANP-3352NP, Revision 0, St. Luice, Unit 2, Fuel Transition License Amendment Request, Technical Report ML14149A1952013-02-0404 February 2013 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Technical Letter Report for Evaluation of Alternative to 10 CFR 50.55a(G)(6)ll)(F)(4) for Limitations to Volumetric Examination of Dissimilar Metal Welds ML12340A3522012-11-30030 November 2012 St. Lucie, Unit 1, 12Q4116-RPT-001, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic L-2012-427, Q4116-R-002, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic2012-11-30030 November 2012 Q4116-R-002, Rev. 0, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic ML12097A2682012-04-17017 April 2012 Biological Assessment for Formal Section 7 Consultation at the St. Lucie Plant, Units 1 and 2 L-2012-072, ANP-2903Q2(NP), Rev 0, St. Lucie, Unit 1 - EPU Cycle Realistic Large Break LOCA Summary Report with Zr-4 Fuel Cladding, Attachment 32012-02-29029 February 2012 ANP-2903Q2(NP), Rev 0, St. Lucie, Unit 1 - EPU Cycle Realistic Large Break LOCA Summary Report with Zr-4 Fuel Cladding, Attachment 3 ML12061A2492012-02-29029 February 2012 ANP-3067, Rev. 1, St. Lucie, Unit 1 EPU - Information to Support NRC Review of RCS Depressurization with Pressurizer Overfill L-2012-072, ANP-3067, Rev. 1, St. Lucie, Unit 1 EPU - Information to Support NRC Review of RCS Depressurization with Pressurizer Overfill2012-02-29029 February 2012 ANP-3067, Rev. 1, St. Lucie, Unit 1 EPU - Information to Support NRC Review of RCS Depressurization with Pressurizer Overfill L-2011-471, ANP-3057(NP), Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 1 EPU - Responses to NRC Questions SRXB-58, SRXB-59, and SRXB-60.2011-10-31031 October 2011 ANP-3057(NP), Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 1 EPU - Responses to NRC Questions SRXB-58, SRXB-59, and SRXB-60. L-2011-389, Response to NRC Reactor Systems Branch Request for Additional Information Regarding Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request2011-09-22022 September 2011 Response to NRC Reactor Systems Branch Request for Additional Information Regarding Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request L-2011-311, ANP-3019NP, Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 1 EPU - Information to Support NRC Review of Steam Generator Tube Rupture, Attachment 22011-08-31031 August 2011 ANP-3019NP, Revision 0, St. Lucie Unit 1 EPU - Information to Support NRC Review of Steam Generator Tube Rupture, Attachment 2 L-2011-342, ANP-3028(NP), Revision 0, St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1 EPU RAIs - Nuclear Performance & Code (Snpb)2011-08-31031 August 2011 ANP-3028(NP), Revision 0, St. Lucie Plant, Unit 1 EPU RAIs - Nuclear Performance & Code (Snpb) L-2011-228, 103-87735, Heated Water Plan of Study2011-06-30030 June 2011 103-87735, Heated Water Plan of Study L-2011-206, ANP-2903(NP), Revision 1, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - EPU Cycle Realistic Large Break LOCA Summary Report with ZR-4 Fuel Cladding, Attachment 72011-05-31031 May 2011 ANP-2903(NP), Revision 1, St. Lucie Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - EPU Cycle Realistic Large Break LOCA Summary Report with ZR-4 Fuel Cladding, Attachment 7 ML11153A0492011-05-31031 May 2011 ANP-3000(NP), Rev. 0, St. Lucie Nuclear, Unit 1 - EPU-Information to Support License Amendment Request, Attachment 6 L-2011-206, ANP-3000(NP), Rev. 0, St. Lucie Nuclear, Unit 1 - EPU-Information to Support License Amendment Request, Attachment 62011-05-31031 May 2011 ANP-3000(NP), Rev. 0, St. Lucie Nuclear, Unit 1 - EPU-Information to Support License Amendment Request, Attachment 6 L-2011-021, St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix D, List of Key Acronyms2011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix D, List of Key Acronyms L-2011-021, St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix B Additional Codes and Methods2011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix B Additional Codes and Methods ML1107302992011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Licensing Report L-2011-021, St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix a Safety Evaluation Report Compliance2011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix a Safety Evaluation Report Compliance L-2011-021, St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix F, Camereron Ultrasonics Engineering Reports, Cover2011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix F, Camereron Ultrasonics Engineering Reports, Cover L-2011-021, St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix E, Supplement to Licensing Report Section 2.4.1 Reactor Protection, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation, and Control Systems2011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix E, Supplement to Licensing Report Section 2.4.1 Reactor Protection, Engineered Safety Feature Actuation, and Control Systems L-2011-021, St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix G, Holtec Report No. HI-2104753, St. Lucie Unit 2 Criticality Analysis for EPU and Non-EPU2011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5; Appendix G, Holtec Report No. HI-2104753, St. Lucie Unit 2 Criticality Analysis for EPU and Non-EPU L-2011-021, St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5, Appendix C, Grid Stability Analysis and System Impact Study for St. Lucie Plant with Proposed EPU2011-02-25025 February 2011 St. Lucie, Unit 2 - License Amendment Request for Extended Power Uprate, Attachment 5, Appendix C, Grid Stability Analysis and System Impact Study for St. Lucie Plant with Proposed EPU 2022-04-13
[Table view] |
Text
ENGINEERING, RC.
St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2017 Population Update Analysis
.... .... *1-*
\
' \
\
I j
6 I
I I
I
/
/ I I
I I
/
/
/
/
/
Legend Q
St.Luci*
Area
\.-:. 2, 5, 10 MIi, Rin1s 10 Mile.s Work performed for Florida Power & light, by:
KLD Engineering, P.C.
1601 Veterans Memorial Highway, Suite 340 Islandia, NY 11749 E-mail: kweinisch@kldcompanies.com Septem ber 20, 2017 Final Report , Rev 0 KLD TR - 937
Executive Summary Federal regulations (Section IV of Appendix E to 10CFR part SO) require nuclear power plant licensees to estimate the permanent resident population within the Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) of the plant at least annually during the years between decennial censuses. If the population increases such that the longest 90th percentile Evacuation Time Estimate (ETE) for the 2-mile region, 5-mile region or the entire EPZ increases by 25 percent or 30 minutes, whichever is less, a full ETE update is required. Based on U.S.
Census Bureau data, the population within the 2-mile region, 5-mile region and the entire EPZ for the St.
Lucie Nuclear Power Plant (St. Lucie) has increased by +11.0%, +11.8% and +12.9%, respectively, since the 2010 Census . Based on the population sensitivity study documented in the 2012 St. Lucie ETE report, population growth of +10% or greater is needed to increase the 90th percentile ETE by 30 minutes or more. As such, the population within the EPZ has grown enough at this time to trigger a full ETE update. As per federal regulations, the full ETE update must be completed and submitted to the NRC prior to September 20, 2018.
Florida Power & Light (FPL) acknowledges that 10CFRSO, Appendix E,Section IV.4 requires a full ETE analysis to be done within 365 days of the availability of the most recent decennial census data . The last full ETE analysis (KLD TR-533, dated December 2012) was based on the data from the 2010 Census. FPL continues to perform annual permanent resident population estimates for the EPZ (as documented in this report) in the years between the decennial censu ses, in accordance with 10CFRSO, Appendix E,Section IV.5. The annual update for 2017 indicates that permanent resident population within the EPZ has grown enough to significantly impact ETE, thereby triggering a full ETE analysis.
Introduction The federal regulations (Section IV of Appendix E to 10CFR part 50) stipulate :
During th e years between decennial censuses, nuclear power reactor licensees shall estimate EPZ permanent resident population changes once a year, but no later than 365 days from the date of the previous estimate, using the most recent U.S. Census Bureau annual resident population estimate and State/local government population data, if available. These licensees shall maintain these estimates so that they are available for NRC inspection during the period between decennial censuses and shall submit these estimates to the NRC with any updated ETE analysis.
St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 1 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popu lation Update Ana lysis - 2017 Rev.0
If at any time during the decennial period, the EPZ permanent resident population increases such that it causes the longest ETE value for the 2-mile zone or 5-mile zone, including all affected Emergency Response Planning Area s, or for the entire 10-mile EPZ to increase by 25 percent or 30 minutes, whichever is less, from the nuclear power reactor licensee's currently NRC approved or updated ETE, the licensee shall update the ETE analysis to reflect the impact of that population increase. The licensee shall submit the updated ETE analysis to the NRC under§ 50.4 no later than 365 days after the licensee's determination that the criteria for updating the ETE have been met and at least 180 days before using it to form protective action recommendations and providing it to State and local governmental authorities for use in developing offsite protective action strategies.
FPL has contracted KLD Engineering, P.C. to estimate annual population changes between the decennial censuses for St. Lucie in accordance with the aforementioned federal regulations . FPL and the offsite response organizations (OROs) - Martin and St. Lucie Counties, the State of Florida - have reviewed and approved the methodology and Census growth rates provided below.
US Census Growth Rates The population analysis for the 2012 St. Lucie ETE was performed using 2010 Census population data 1 2 provided on the U.S. Census Bureau website
- The Census Bureau QuickFacts website provides annual population updates for each state, county, and municipality3 in the United States . The most recent population updates for counties and municipalities available on the QuickFacts website are for the time 4
period from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016 . The population change for each county and municipality within the study area (EPZ plus the Shadow Region, which extends to 15 miles radially from the plant) provided by QuickFacts is summarized in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
1 www.census .gov 2
https://www.census .gov/quickfacts/table/PST045216/00 3
https://www.census .qov/data/tables/2016/demo/popest/total-cities-and-towns .html 4
The annual population estimates prepared by the Census Bureau for the entire U.S. involves an extensive data gathering process .
As such , populati on estimates are a year behind - 20 16 data are released in 2017. The schedule for re lease of Census data is provided on the Census website: https://www.ce nsus.gov/programs-surveys/popest/about/schedule .html St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 2 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Population Update Analysis - 2017 Rev . O
The Census does provide population estimates for the Cen sus Designated Placess (e.g., Indian River Estates, White City, River Park, etc.) within the study area at each decennial census . However, the Census Bureau does not provide annual population estimates for CDPs between decennial censuses.
Thus, a growth rate since the 2010 Census cannot be computed for CDPs . This analysis used county population growth rates for CDPs as population within the CDPs is included within the county population . The county, municipal, and CDP boundaries are shown in Figure 1.
The U.S. Census Bureau works closely with state and local agencies to ensure that population estimates between decennial censuses are done consistently and to assure the highest quality in performing these estimates, as evidenced by the existence of the Federal-State Cooperative Program for Local Population 6
Estimates (FSCPE) . The FSCPE meets twice a year and has an established set of by-laws to ensure consistency and quality in population estimates at the federal, state and local levels. The counties within the EPZ were asked for local data; no data was provided. Thus, this report uses U.S. Census growth rates.
These Census growth rates were reviewed by the planning agencies within each of the EPZ counties and found to be acceptable .
Tab le 1. County Population Change from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016 5
A Census Designated Place (CDP) is similar to an incorporated place (city, village, town , etc.) in that it is a place that people recog nize by name . However, incorporated places have a separate municipal government, while CDPs do not. One of the main uses of Census data is political in terms of fund allocations (proportional to population size) to different municipalities by the state or county. The Census does not provide annual population estimates for CDPs because they Jack government and are not eligible for funding .
6 https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popesUabouUfscpe .html St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 3 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Population Update Analysis - 2017 Rev. O
Table 2. Municipality Population Change from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016 7
Municipality 2010 Population 2016 Population Percent Change Martin County, FL EPZ Ocean Breeze Park 355 357 0.56%
Sewall's Point 1,996 2,180 9.22%
Stuart 15,588 16,623 6.64%
St. Lucie County, FL EPZ Fort Pierce I 41,918 I 45,295 I 8.06%
Port St. Lucie I 164,716 I 185,132 1 12.39%
Shado w Region St. Lucie Village I 597 I 636 I 6.53%
7 The 2010 Population of Fort Pierce City and St. Lucie Village listed in Table 2 do not match those numbers reported in the ETE Update for 2016 (KLD TR-872, September 21, 2016). Slight population adjustments have been made through the Population Estimates Challenge Program to the 2010 Census Population numbers . Thi s program allows governmental units to challenge their population estimates by submitting additional data to the Census Bureau for evaluation . This report displays the 20 10 population data as it is cu rrently published on the Census Bureau website and may vary from numbers reported in previous ETE Updates .
Additional details about the Population Estimates Challenge Program can be fou nd at th e following webs ite:
https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popesVabouVchallenqe-program .html St. Lu cie Nuclear Power Plant 4 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popu lation Update Anal ysis - 2017 Rev . 0
St. Lucie
' \
Count y \
' \
\
'Atlantic Ocean
\
\
\
' \
' \
' \. \
\
/
/
I
' I I
I I
I r
I t
JI
- ii I
I I
/ I
/ I
/
Legend I
/
St.Lucie /
/
CJ EPZ /
~ Shadow Region /
(=
/
~ County Boundary Martin /
2, 5, 10, 15 Mile Rin1s Go unty Census Places Q ON: 1/ l/2011 I
Municipalities with Dat:1
~ : CSIIIDffl1r111M.,.2016
(? Census Desi1nated Places (No Data) .........
llDf""'"'"""8,Aoflda,-.rllllht lOMiles Figure 1. Census Boundaries within the St. Lucie Study Area St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 5 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Population Update Analysis - 2017 Rev. 0
Methodology The compound growth formula (Equation 1) was used for all population projections, where g is the ann ual growth rate and X is the number of years projected forward from Year 2010. The compound growth formula can be solved for g as shown in Equation 2. The data provided in Table 1 and Table 2 were used in Equation 2 to compute the annual growth rate for each county and municipality in the study area using X = 6.25 (6 years and 3 months from April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2016). The computed annual growth rates for each county and municipality are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.
Equation 1. Compound Growth Rate (Compound Growth for X years): Population 20lX = Population 2010 x (1 + g)x Equation 2. Annual Growth Rate (Solving for the annual growth rate): g = (Population 20lX Population 2010/lx - l Table 3. Annual Growth Rate by County Table 4. Annual Growth Rate by Municipality Municipality Annual Growth Rate Martin County, FL EPZ Ocean Breeze Park 0.09%
Sewall's Point 1.42%
Stuart 1.03%
St. Lucie County, FL EPZ Fort Pierce I 1.25%
Port St. Lucie I 1.89%
Shadow Region -
St. Lucie Village I 1.02%
St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 6 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popu lation Update Analysis - 2017 Rev. O
The most detailed data should always be used when forecasting population . In terms of detailed data, mun icipal data is the finest level of detail, then county data, and state data. The municipality growth rate was used first and if that was not available or applicable within the study area, then the county growth rate was used. County growth rates are available for the entire study area and were used (in the absence of municipal data) as they are the finest level of detail available for the entire study area. Thus, state data was not used.
The Census Bureau does not provide population data specific to the boundaries of the study area. As such, the county or municipality population reported in Table 1 and Table 2 was used to compute an annual growth rate. Then, the appropriate county or municipality growth rate was only applied to those Cens us blocks located within the study area . All other blocks outside of the study area were not considered as part of the EPZ or Shadow Region population, even if they are located within one of the counties or municipalities that intersect the study area.
Figure 2 maps the Census block centroids in the southwestern portion of the EPZ. The Martin County growth rate was applied to those designated centroids in the county, while the Port St. Lucie municipality growth rate was applied to those centroids located within the Port St. Lucie municipality boundary. As shown in Figure 2, parts of Port St. Lucie extend beyond the 15-mile Shadow Region boundary. While the population in the Census blocks in those parts of the municipality beyond 15 miles was considered in the computation of the growth rate for the municipality, the population at those centroids beyond 15 miles was not included in the study area population.
Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) mapping software, the appropriate annual growth rate was applied to each Census block in the study area depending on which county or municipality the block is located within. The population was then projected to September 1, 2017 for this update using Equation 1 with X = 7.42 (7 years and 5 months from the April 1, 2010 Census date to September 1, 2017) .
St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 7 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popu lation Update Analysis - 2017 Rev. O
O.i.: 7/i/l01' Co pyr1,t,i1: URI D<<t .wt M*Ps J014 KlO l nclMllflrc. f ~ Po.et A utf,t Legend Census l"opulatlon Location Census Boundary Munlcipallty Growth Rate Munklpallty
- 6. Port St. Lucie County Growth Rate County 0 Martin County LJMartln c:::::J EPZ ( -::::. 15 Mile Ring 0 0.25 0.5 Q Shadow Region I I II I I Figure 2. County and Municipality Growth Rates Applied by Location St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 8 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popu lation Update Analysis - 2017 Rev.O
Results The Areas which comprise the approximate 10-mile EPZ for St. Lucie are shown in Figure 3. Table 5 8
presents the 2010 permanent resident population and estimated permanent resident population for 2017 for each Area, for the EPZ as a whole, and also for the 2 and 5 mile regions. Table 6 presents the 2010 permanent resident population and estimated permanent resident population for 2017 for the St.
Lucie Shadow Region. Figure 4 and Figure 5 present the estimated 2017 EPZ and Shadow Region permanent resident population, respectively, by sector and distance from the St. Lucie site. These "population roses" were constructed using GIS software.
Note that the 2-Mile Region and 5-Mile Region do not conform exactly to the 2-mile and 5-mile radii due to the irregular shape of the Areas; see Figure 3. Thus, the 2-mile and 5-mile populations shown in Figure 4 do not exactly match the 2-Mile Region and 5-Mile Region totals in Table 5.
Equat ion 3 was used to compute the percent change in population from 2010 to 2017. The percent change in population for the various regions of interest is summarized in Table 7.
8 As per federal regulations, only the permanent resident population needs to be considered in the annual updates ; transient and special facility populations are not considered.
St. Lu cie Nuclear Power Plant 9 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Population Update Analysis - 2017 Rev.O
H
- .... .... ' w~ ,
' \
- .... ' \
\
\
\
\
' I I
I
/
/ I I
I I
/
/
/
/
/
Legend GJ St . Lucie Area
, -=. 2, 5, 10 Mil* Rings 10 Mllu Figure 3. Areas Comprising the St. Lucie EPZ St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 10 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Population Update Analysis - 2017 Rev.O
Table 5. EPZ Population 2017 2010 Extrapolated Area Population Population 1 3,676 4,033 8 7,736 8,639 2-Mile Region Total: 11,412 12,672 2 13,199 14,75 2 6 22,505 25,737 7 21,995 24,071 5-Mile Region Total: 69,111 77,232 3 37,713 41,547 4 38,391 43,764 5 72,494 83,161 t** ~.
,,+/- ~°'. *~-I[~-:*;~"~"' ~*iA
'f; fi,~,h,;i.,,.ec .. ti*
~~. ~-
~--~~~'r,,;J.,<-";<;,,
V : t .. ~ ~ : -
~~h~n Table 6. Shadow Population by Sector 2017 Extrapolated Sector 2010 Population Population N 0 0 NNE 0 0 NE 0 0 ENE 0 0 E 0 0 ESE 0 0 SE 0 0 SSE 8,482 9,299 s 43,648 47,620 SSW 14,04 1 15,486 SW 30,851 35,395 WSW 20,275 23,263 w 3,596 4,078 WNW 2,351 2, 649 NW 7, 109 7,985 NNW 5,382 6,03 2
- , s;,,,:l ~ '*.-t*>'r ,Jc*. ,v. "";;""' ;,:;
St. Lucie Nucl ear Power Plant 11 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popul ation Upd at e Anal ysis - 2017 Rev.O
NNW NNE 14,455 I CD 0
NW NE
@4,043! CD
WNW ENE
!14,262! CD w E
!31, 772! I 0 o* CD I
I i WSW ESE
~ 7,964! IT]
' ,l.S7S
SW ' SE
@6,286! [ill]
, -' 10 Miles to EPZ Boundary 0
SSW .l - - - SSE
~4,873! s !11,689! N 120,0501 2017 Extrapolated Resident Population Miles subtotal by Rine Cumulative Total 0*1 180 180 1* 2 335 515 2*3 412 927
- 3. 4 8,919 9,846 w E
- 4. 5 20,564 30,410 5* 6 27,630 58,040 6-7 36,066 94,106 7-8 47,634 141,740 8 -9 49,460 191,200 9 - 10 40,925 232,125 10
- EPZ 13,579 245,704 Total: 245,704 Figure 4. Permanent EPZ Resident Population by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 12 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popu lation Update Analysis - 2017 Rev.O
N NNW 0 NNE 0
NW NE 7,985 0 WNW ENE 12,649 1 0 w E 14,01s I EPZ Resident Population See Figure 4 0
).
ESE WSW I23, 2631 0 SW SE 135,3951 0 EPZ Boundary t o 11 M ilos SSW ' _,
115,4861 2017 Extrapolated Shadow Population M iles Subtotal by Ring Cumulative Total EPZ
- 12 40,047 76,911 12 - 13 37,620 114,531 13
- 14 19,488 134,019 14 - 15 17,788 151,807 Total : 151,807 Figure 5. Shadow Population by Sector St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 13 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Popu lation Update Analysis - 2017 Rev. O
Equation 3. Percent Population Change 2017 Extrapolated Population - 2010 Population
% population change= x 100%
2010 Population Table 7. Summary of Percent Population Changes Percent Region Population Change (2010-2017) 2-Mile Region +11.0%
5-Mile Region +11.8%
EPZ +12.9%
Shadow Region +11.8%
EPZ + Shadow Region +12.5%
As documented in the NRC's response to the Emergency Planning Frequently Asked Question (EPFAQ) 2013-001, the licensee should consider the impact of a population increase on the longest goth percentile ETE for the scenarios identified in Table 1-3 of NUREG/CR-7002, with two possible exceptions:
- 1. The roadway impact scenario need not be considered because the only purpose of this scenario is to support the development of traffic control planning.
- 2. The need to include the special event scenario depends on the frequency of the special event analyzed. Licensees should consider using this scenario if the special event chosen is repetitive during the year, such as multiple home football or baseball games, and not a one-time event such as a seasonal parade.
As documented in Table 7-1, "Time to Clear the Indicated Area of 90 Percent of the Affected Population" in th e 2012 St. Lucie ETE Report, the scenario with the longest 90th percentile ETE is Scenario 7 - a winter, midweek, midday scenario with rain - a non-special event.
St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant 14 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Population Update Analysis - 2017 Rev.0
Table 8 is from Ta ble M -3 in Appendix M of the 2012 St. Lucie ETE Report and documents the population sensitivity study conducted under Scenario 7 conditions. As disc ussed in the introduction, federal regulations stipulat e that a full updated ETE study mu st be conducted if population growth is large enough t o cause the longest goth percentile ETE to increase by 25 percent or 30 minutes, whichever is less. Those population changes which result in a goth percentile ETE change meeting or exceeding the federal criteria f~r a full ETE update are highlighted red in Table 8.
As shown in Table 8, at least a 10% increase in population in the EPZ is needed to increase the longest goth percentile ETE by 30 minutes. The EPZ population has increased by 12.g% as shown in Table 7. Thus, population has grown enough to trigger a full ETE update. As discussed in the introduction, the federal regulations indicate that the licensee shall submit the updated ETE analysis to the NRC under §50.4 no later than 365 days after the licensee's determination that the criteria for updating the ETE have been met and at least 180 days before using it to form protective action recommendations and providing it to State and local governmental authorities fo r use in developing offsite protective action strategies. Thus, a full ETE update must be completed and submitted to the NRC prior to September 20, 2018.
Table 8. ETE Variation with Population Change Region Base 3% 4% 5% 7%
2-MILE 5 :35 5:40 5:40 5:40 5:45 5-MILE 4:05 4:05 4:15 4 :15 4 :20 Population Increase Region Base 3% 4% 5% 7% 10%
2-MILE 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:10 7:10 7:20 5- MILE 7:05 7:05 7:05 7:10 7:10 7:20 FULL EPZ 8:10 8 :40 8 :40 8:40 8:40 8:55 St. Lu cie Nuclear Powe r Plant 15 KLD Engineering, P.C.
Population Update An alysis - 2017 Rev. O