ML121170455

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:07, 28 June 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Additional Information - Fitness for Duty Annual Program Performance Data, January Through December 2010
ML121170455
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry, Watts Bar, Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 04/25/2012
From: James Shea
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML121170455 (23)
v • d • e


Text

Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 April 25, 2012 10 CFR 26.11 10 CFR 26.717 ATTN: NRC Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 NRC Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-77 and DPR-79 NRC Docket Nos. 50-327 and 50-328 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 Facility Operating License No. NPF-90 NRC Docket No. 50-390 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Construction Permit No. CPPR-92 NRC Docket No. 50-391

Subject:

Additional Information

-Fitness for Duty Annual Program Performance Data, January through December 2010

Reference:

Letter from R. M. Krich (TVA) to the NRC, "Fitness for Duty Annual Program Performance Data, January through December 2010," dated February 28, 2011 This submittal provides additional information to update the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA's) Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data for January through December 2010.This information, as originally provided to the NRC in a February 28, 2011, letter (above reference), did not contain the random testing rate for TVA's Corporate office as required by 10 CFR 26.717(b)(1) and 10 CFR 26.717(f).

In response to an electronic-mail request from Paul Harris (NRC) to Ronald Casey (TVA), TVA is providing this updated report for the Fitness Printed on recycled paper I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 April 25, 2012 For Duty Annual Program Performance Data, January through December 2010, which includes the following additional information:

  • Page E1-1 has been revised to add a Table consolidating the number of employees/contractors, number of random tests and percentage tested for each site, adding data for the TVA Corporate office testing.* Page E5-2 has been revised to add the number of "Licensee Employees" and "Short-Term Contractor Personnel" in the Table.Additionally, the "Date of Notification" listed for NRC Event 46008 in Enclosure 6 was revised from June 14, 2010 (Date of Event), to June 15, 2010.The entire updated report is provided as Enclosures to this letter.There are no new regulatory commitments contained in this letter. Please direct any questions concerning this matter to Kara M. Stacy at (423) 751-3489.ac_-f. Shea lager, Corporate Nuclear Licensing

Enclosures:

1. Updated Fitness for Duty Performance Data, January through December 2010 2. Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Summary of Management Actions and Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data 3. Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Summary of Management Actions and Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data 4. Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Summary of Management Actions and Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data 5. Corporate Nuclear Power Group Offices, Summary of Management Actions and Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data 6. Summary of Fitness for Duty Events Reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Operations Center 7. Browns Ferry, Sequoyah, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants, Fatigue Management Summary -2010

Enclosures:

cc (Enclosures):

NRC Regional Administrator

-Region II NRC Senior Resident Inspector

-Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant NRC Senior Resident Inspector

-Sequoyah Nuclear Plant NRC Senior Resident Inspector

-Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 NRC Senior Resident Inspector

-Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 ENCLOSUREI TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY UPDATED FITNESS FOR DUTY PERFORMANCE DATA JANUARY THROUGH DECEMBER 2010 The following summarizes the results of testing performed during this reporting period for personnel subject to Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA's) Fitness for Duty Program.I. TVA's "Re-screeninq of Specimens"

Reference:

TVA's Letter to NRC, "Fitness for Duty (FFD) Program Performance Data: July -December 1996, dated February 28, 1997." Summary In accordance with 10 CFR 26.717(b)(2), TVA re-screens specimens with a creatinine level of less than 20 mg/dl, as discussed in the above Reference.

During this 2010 Annual reporting period, TVA Nuclear Power Group screened 596 specimens at this lower cutoff level for marijuana with three positive results identified.

I1. Trends The confirmed positive test rate for all categories (pre-employment, pre-access, for-cause, post-accident, random, follow-up, and other) for the 2010 Annual reporting period was 0.53 percent (80 positive results out of 15,225 tests). The rate of random confirmed positives was 0.24 percent (14 positive results out of 5,886 tests). TVA's random testing rate for 2010 exceeded the required 50% of the population that is subject to the FFD Program as identified in 10 CFR 26.31 (d)(2)(vii).

Site No. of employees/contractors No. of random tests Percentage tested Corporate 682 688 100.88%Browns Ferry 2612 1550 59.34%Sequoyah 1919 1038 54.09%Watts Bar 4586 2610 56.91%Totals 9799 5886 60.06%E1-1 ENCLOSURE2 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA In the pre-access test category, nine Contract Employees (CEs) tested positive." The CEs were denied access, removed from site and returned to the contract company." All nine of the CEs were restricted from all Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) work for three years." Five CEs requested that split specimen testing be performed.

The split specimen tests reconfirmed the positive test results." Three of the CEs requested appeals. The positive test results were upheld.Also in the pre-access test category, two CEs refused to continue the testing after providing urine specimens outside the acceptable temperature range and subsequently not providing a second observed/witness collection.

The CEs were denied access, removed from site, returned to the contract company, and permanently restricted from all TVA work.The appeals requested by both CEs upheld the refusal to test determination.

In the for-cause (observed behavior/reasonable suspicion) test category, two CEs tested positive.* The CEs were denied access, removed from site, and returned to the contract company.* One CE was permanently restricted from all TVA work for attempting to subvert the testing process by substituting another urine specimen as theirs. The first urine specimen was outside of the acceptable temperature range, tested analytically negative and was subsequently cancelled by the Medical Review Officer (MRO).The second urine test, an observed/witness collection, also tested positive.Additionally, the CE refused to complete the MRO interview." One CE was restricted from all TVA work for three years. A review of the CE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

In the random test category, two CEs and one Licensee Employee (LE) tested positive.* The CEs were denied access, removed from site, returned to the contract company, and restricted from all TVA work for three years. A review of the CEs' work did not identify any deficiencies." In addition to revocation of unescorted access, the LE was removed from site, suspended for a minimum of fourteen days and referred to the Employee Assistance Program. The LE returned to work during this 2010 Annual reporting period and was placed in the follow-up alcohol and drug testing program. A review of the LE's work did not identify any discrepancies.

E2-1 Also in the random test category, one CE refused to report for random testing. The CE, who had been laid off the same day as the random test, was instructed to report for random testing before leaving the site. The CE was permanently restricted from all TVA work for the refusal to test. The appeal requested by the CE upheld the refusal to test determination.

In the follow-up test category, one CE and two LEs tested positive.0 In addition to revocation of unescorted access, the CE was removed from site, returned to the contract company, and permanently restricted from all TVA work due to the previous positive test results. A review of the CE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

  • In addition to revocation of unescorted access, the LEs were removed from site, suspended for a minimum of fourteen days and referred to the Employee Assistance Program. Both LEs resigned/retired.

One LE requested a split specimen testing be performed.

The split specimen tests reconfirmed the'positive test results. A review of the LEs' work did not identify any discrepancies.

E2-2 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/31/10 12 MONTHS ENDING COMPANY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT LOCATION RONALD L. CASEY CONTACT NAME CUTOFFS: SCREEN/CONFIRMATION (ng/ml)423-751-7923 PHONE (INCLUDING AREA CODE)ALCOHOL (% BAC)0.04%COCAINE 300/150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25/25 2000/2000 AMPHETAMINES 1000/500 *MARIJUANA 50/15 OPIATES*Specimens with a creatinine level less than 20 mg/dl are evaluated using a 20 ng/ml cutoff on the initial marijuana screen and the limit of quantitation as a cutoff on the GC/MS for marijuana metabolite.

Long-Term

    • Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with 1,595 N/A 1017 Unescorted Access Categories
  1. # # # # #Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 321 0 N/A N/A 2928 9 For Post-Event 6 0 N/A N/A 18 0 Cause Observed behavior 6 0 N/A N/A 6 2 Random 942 1 N/A N/A 608 2 Follow-up 81 2 N/A N/A 42 1 Other 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 Total 1356 3 N/A N/A 3602 14"*Both long-term and short-term contractors are included in the "Short-Term Contractor Personnel" category.E2-3 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances

-Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphe- Phency- Alcohol Refusal Adulterated Substituted 1 2 3 4 tamines clidine to test Specimen Specimen Licensee Employees 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long-Term N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Contractors Short-Term Contractors 4 2 0 0 0 5 3 0 1 0 0 3 10 Total 4* 3 0 007 30 1 0 10 13 10 12* One specimen from this category tested negative at the 50 ng/ml cutoff limit but positive using the 20 ng/ml cutoff limit.Cutoff Levels of Additional Drugs DRUG SUBSTANCE Cut-off Level (ng/ml)NUMBER Screen Confirmation 1 Barbiturates 300 300 2 Benzodiazepines 300 300 3 Methadone 300 300 4 Propoxyphene 300 300 E2-4 ENCLOSURE3 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA In the pre-access test category, thirteen Contract Employees (CEs) tested positive.* The CEs were denied access, removed from site and returned to the contract company." Twelve of the CEs were restricted from all Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) work for three years.* One of the CEs was permanently restricted from all TVA work because of a previous positive test result.* Four CEs requested that split specimen testing be performed.

The split specimen tests reconfirmed the positive test results.* Three of the CEs requested appeals. The positive test results were upheld.* Since one CE had been badged as a reinstatement, a review of that CE's work did not identify any discrepancies.

In the for-cause (observed behavior/reasonable suspicion) test category, three CEs tested positive." The CEs were denied access, removed from site, and returned to the contract company.* One CE was permanently restricted from all TVA work for attempting to subvert the testing process by substituting another urine specimen as theirs. The first urine specimen was outside of the acceptable temperature range, tested analytically negative and was subsequently cancelled by the Medical Review Officer (MRO).The second urine test was an observed/witness collection and tested positive.

Split specimen testing reconfirmed the positive results.* Two CEs were restricted from all TVA work for three years. A review of the CEs'work did not identify any deficiencies.

In the follow-up test category, two CEs and two Licensee Employees (LEs) tested positive." The CEs were denied access, removed from site, and returned to the contract company.* One CE was permanently restricted from all WVA work because of a previous positive test. A review of the CE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

This CE tested positive for a second time before his first test was determined by the MRO." One CE was restricted from all TVA work for three years. A review of the CE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

  • Unescorted access was revoked for the two LEs. Both LEs were permanently restricted from all TVA work because of previous positive test results. A review of the LEs' work did not identify any discrepancies.
  • One of LEs requested an appeal. The positive test results were upheld.E3-1 In the random test category, one CE tested positive.* The CE was denied access, removed from site, returned to the contract company, and restricted from all TVA work for three years. A review of the CE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

The CE requested an appeal which upheld the positive test results determination.

E3-2 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 12/31/10 12 MONTHS ENDING COMPANY SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT LOCATION RONALD L. CASEY CONTACT NAME 423-751-7923 PHONE (INCLUDING AREA CODE)CUTOFFS: SCREEN/CONFIRMATION (ng/ml)ALCOHOL (% BAC)0.04%COCAINE 300/150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25/25 2000/2000 AMPHETAMINES 1000/500 *MARIJUANA 50/15 OPIATES*Specimens with a creatinine level less than 20 mg/dl are evaluated using a 20 ng/ml cutoff on the initial marijuana screen and the limit of quantitation as a cutoff on the GC/MS for marijuana metabolite.

Long-Term

    • Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with 1354 N/A 565 Unescorted Access Categories
  1. # # #Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 299 0 N/A N/A 1563 13 For Post-Event 5 0 N/A N/A 7 0 Cause Observed behavior 9 0 N/A N/A 6 3 Random 711 0 N/A N/A 327 1 Follow-up 10 2 N/A N/A 37 3 Other 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 Total 1034 2 N/A N/A 1940 20**Both long-term and short-term contractors are included in the 'Short-Term Contractor Personnel" category.E3-3 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances

-Sequoyah Nuclear Plant Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphe- Phency- Alcohol Refusal Adulterated Substituted 1 2 3 4 tamines clidine to test Specimen Specimen Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long-Term N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Contractors Short-Term Contractors 13 1 2 1 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Total 13 2 1 2 0 5 0 0 1 0 1 10 2* One CE tested positive for both marijuana and cocaine.Cutoff Levels of Additional Drugs DRUG SUBSTANCE Cut-off Level (ng/ml)NUMBER Screen Confirmation 1 Barbiturates 300 300 2 Benzodiazepines 300 300 3 Methadone 300 300 4 Propoxyphene 300 300 E3-4 ENCLOSURE4 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA In the pre-access test category, twenty-three Contract Employees (CEs) tested positive.* The CEs were denied access, removed from site, and returned to the contract company.* Twenty-one of the CEs were restricted from all Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)work for three years." One CE was permanently restricted from all TVA work for attempting to subvert the testing process by substituting another urine specimen as theirs. The first urine specimen was outside of the acceptable temperature range, tested analytically negative and was subsequently cancelled by the Medical Review Officer (MRO).The second urine test was an observed/witness collection and tested positive." One CE was permanently restricted from all TVA work because of a previous positive test result.* Thirteen CEs requested that split specimen testing be performed.

The split specimen tests reconfirmed the positive test results." One of the CEs requested an appeal. The appeal upheld the positive test result.In the for-cause (observed behavior/reasonable suspicion) test category, four CEs and one Licensee Employee (LE) tested positive.* The CEs were denied access, removed from site and returned to the contract company.* The four CEs were restricted from all TVA work for three years. A review of the CEs' work did not identify any deficiencies.

  • The LE was permanently restricted from all TVA work for attempting to subvert the testing process by substituting another urine specimen as theirs. The first urine specimen was outside of the acceptable temperature range, tested analytically negative and was subsequently cancelled by the MRO. The second urine test was an observed/witness collection which tested positive.

The LE requested that split specimen testing be performed.

The split specimen tests reconfirmed the positive test result. A review of the LE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

In the random test category, ten CEs tested positive.* The CEs were denied access, removed from site, returned to the contract company and restricted from all TVA work for three years. A review of the CEs' work did not identify any deficiencies.

  • Six CEs requested that split specimen testing be performed.

The split specimen tests reconfirmed the positive test results.* Three of the CEs requested an appeal. The appeals upheld the positive test results.E4-1 In the follow-up test category, one CE tested positive.* The CE's unescorted access was revoked. The CE was removed from site, returned to the contract company, and permanently restricted from all TVA work because of a previous positive test results. A review of the CE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

In the post-event test category, one CE tested positive.* The CE's unescorted access was revoked. The CE was removed from site, returned to the contract company and restricted from all TVA work for three years.The CE requested that split specimen testing be performed.

The split specimen tests reconfirmed the positive test results. A review of the CE's work did not identify any deficiencies.

E4-2 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY COMPANY WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT 12/31/10 12 MONTHS ENDING LOCATION RONALD L. CASEY CONTACT NAME 423-751-7923 PHONE (INCLUDING AREA CODE)CUTOFFS: SCREEN/CONFIRMATION (ng/ml)ALCOHOL (% BAC)0.04%COCAINE 300/150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25/25 2000/2000 AMPHETAMINES 1000/500 *MARIJUANA 50/15 OPIATES*Specimens with a creatinine level less than 20 mg/dl are evaluated using a 20 ng/ml cutoff on the initial marijuana screen and the limit of quantitation as a cutoff on the GC/MS for marijuana metabolite.

Long-Term

    • Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with 1288 N/A 3298 Unescorted Access Categories
  1. # # # # #Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 209 0 N/A N/A 3429 23 For Post-event 7 0 N/A N/A 29 1 Cause Observed behavior 2 1 N/A N/A 15 4 Random 679 0 N/A N/A 1931 10 Follow-up 39 0 N/A N/A 166 1 Other 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 Total 936 1 N/A N/A 5570 39 Both long-term and category.short-term contractors are included in the "Short-Term Contractor Personnel" E4-3 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances

-Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphe- Phency- Alcohol Refusal Adulterated Substituted 1 2 3 4 tamines clidine to test Specimen Specimen Licensee Employees 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Long-Term N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Contractors Short-Term Contractors 22 4 1 4 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 Total 22* 4 1 5 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 2 0'Two specimens from this category tested negative at the 50 ng/ml cutoff limit but positive using the 20 ng/ml cutoff limit.Cutoff Levels of Additional Drugs DRUG SUBSTANCE Cut-off Level (ng/ml)NUMBER Screen Confirmation 1 Barbiturates 300 300 2 Benzodiazepines 300 300 3 Methadone 300 300 4 Propoxyphene 300 300 E4-4 ENCLOSURE5 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CORPORATE NUCLEAR POWER GROUP OFFICES

SUMMARY

OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS AND FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA In the follow-up test category, one LE tested positive." The LE's unescorted access was revoked. The LE was removed from site, suspended for a minimum of fourteen days, and referred to the Employee Assistance Program. The LE returned to work during this 2010 Annual reporting period. A review of the LE's work did not identify any discrepancies." The LE event was reported to the NRC under 10 CFR 26.719 (Event Number 46008, "Non-Licensed Supervisor Fitness for Duty.")E5-1 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10 CFR 26 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY COMPANY CORPORATE OFFICES (CHATTANOOGA, KNOXVILLE, AND OTHERS)LOCATION 12/31/10 12 MONTHS ENDING RONALD L. CASEY CONTACT NAME 423-751-7923 PHONE (INCLUDING AREA CODE)CUTOFFS: SCREEN/CONFIRMATION (ng/ml)ALCOHOL (% BAC)0.04%COCAINE 300/150 PHENCYCLIDINE 25/25 2000/2000 AMPHETAMINES 1000/500 *MARIJUANA 50/15 OPIATES*Specimens with a creatinine level less than 20 mg/dI are evaluated using a 20 ng/ml cutoff on the initial marijuana screen and the limit of quantitation as a cutoff on the GC/MS for marijuana metabolite.

Long-Term

    • Short-Term Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Contractor Personnel Average Number with 488 N/A 194 Unescorted Access Categories
  1. # # # # #Tested Positive Tested Positive Tested Positive Pre-Access 70 0 N/A N/A 8 0 For Post-event 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 Cause Observed behavior 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 Random 392 0 N/A N/A 296 *0 Follow-up 14 1 N/A N/A 7 0 Other 0 0 N/A N/A 0 0 Total 476 1 N/A N/A 311 0**Both long-term and short-term contractors are included in the "Short-Term Contractor Personnel" category.E5-2 Breakdown of Confirmed Positive Tests for Specific Substances

-Corporate Offices (Chattanooga, Knoxville, and Others)Marijuana Cocaine Opiates Amphe- Phency- Alcohol Refusal Adulterated Substituted 1 2 3 4 tamines clidine to test Specimen Specimen Licensee Employees 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long-Term N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Contractors Short-Term Contractors 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total [ o o o o 1 o o o o o o o 1L Cutoff Levels of Additional Drugs DRUG SUBSTANCE Cut-off Level (ng/ml)NUMBER'Screen Confirmation 1 Barbiturates 300 300 2 Benzodiazepines 300 300 3 Methadone 300 300 4 Propoxyphene 300 300 E5-3 ENCLOSURE 6 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

SUMMARY

OF FITNESS FOR DUTY EVENTS REPORTED TO THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OPERATIONS CENTER DATE OF METHOD EVENTS N ATION JOB TITLE SUBSTANCE DISCO D ACTION TAKEN NOTIFICATION DISCOVERED 10-001 February 8, 2010 TVA Confirmed Follow-up random test The individual's unescorted access was (NRC Event BFN Supervisor positive for at Browns Ferry revoked. Individual was suspended for a Number alcohol. Nuclear Plant. minimum of fourteen days. Individual 45687) elected to retire. A review of the individual's work was performed with no deficiencies identified.10-002 June 15, 2010 TVA Corporate Confirmed Follow-up test at The individual's unescorted access was (NRC Event Supervisor positive for Corporate office. revoked. Individual was suspended for a Number alcohol. minimum of fourteen days. Individual 46008) completed Employee Assistance Program requirements prior to reconsideration for unescorted access authorization.

Individual returned to work during this 2010 Annual reporting period. A review of the individual's work was performed with no deficiencies identified.

E6-1 ENCLOSURE 7 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY, SEQUOYAH, AND WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANTS FATIGUE MANAGEMENT

SUMMARY

-2010 Fatigue Management Summary Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant -2010 Fatigue Management Data Summary: One waiver in Security.Summary of Waiver Issuance 26.203(e)(1) (i-ii)Number of Waivers Issued for Each Work Hour Control Limit< 34 hr break <Minimum Day>16124 hour >26148 hour >72/7 day in any 9 day Off Group period period period <8hr break <10 hr break period Requirement Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag e e e e e e e e e e e e e e Operations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Brigade Maintenan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ce Chemistry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Physics Security 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Distribution of Waivers for Individuals in Each Category -26.203(e)(iii)

Number of Waivers Issued Operations Fire Brigade Maintenance Chemistry Health Physics Security 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 greater than 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summary of Corrective Actions -26.203(e)2:

None E7-1 Fatigue Management Summary Sequoyah Nuclear Plant -2010 Summary: One waiver in Health Physics; 15 total waivers in Security.Fatigue Management Data Siimmnn, nf WaivAr k~unni~ 2~ 2O31~II1i 1i-ii~Number of Waivers Issued for Each Work Hour Control Limit< 34 hr break in Group >16/24 hour >26/48 hour >72/7 day any 9 day <Minimum Day period period period <8hr break <10 hr break period Off Requirement Online Outage Online Outage Online Outage Online Outage Online -Outage Online Outage Online Outage Operations 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fire Brigade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chemistry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Physics Security 4 0 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 5 0 14 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Distribution of Waivers for Individuals in Each Category -26.203(e)(iii)

Number of Waivers Issued Operations Fire Brigade Maintenance Chemistry Health Physics Security 1 0 0 0 0 1 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 greater than 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summary of Corrective Actions -26.203(e)2:

None E7-2 Fatigue Management Summary Watts Bar Nuclear Plant -2010 Summary: One waiver in Operations for working >26 Hours in a 48 Hour Period as required to maintain minimum staffing; 19 total waivers (multiple rules waived on some waivers) in Security during an inclement weather period requiring personnel to be maintained on station due to unavailability of relief. These waivers were for <10 Hour Break (19 individuals), working >26 Hours in a 48 Hour Period (19 individuals), and working >72 Hours in a 7 Day Period (5 individuals).

Fatigue Management Data Summary of Waiver Issuance 26.203(e)(1) (i-ii)Number of Waivers Issued for Each Work Hour Control Limit< 34 hr break <Minimum Day>16124 hour >26/48 hour >7217 day in any 9 day Off Group period period period <8hr break <10 hr break period Requirement Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag Onlin Outag e e e e e e e e e e e e e e Operations 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fire 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Brigade Maintenan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ce Chemistry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Health 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Physics Security 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Distribution of Waivers for Individuals in Each Category -26.203(e)(iii)

Number of Waivers Issued Operations Fire Brigade Maintenance Chemistry Health Physics Security 1 1 0 0 0 0 19 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 greater than 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Summary of Corrective Actions -26.203(e)2:

None.E7-3

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML121170455&oldid=1765440"