ML17228B031: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 22: Line 22:
ApplicationforamendstolicensesDPR-67&NPF-16,deletingrefstoautomatictester.forcontainmentpersonnelairlockfromTS4.6.1.3.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTRlENCLLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTESRECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD2-2LANORRIS,JINTERNAL:ACRSNRR/DRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXBOGC/HDS3COPIESLTTRENCL111166~FILECENTER0>11NRR/DSSA/SPLB11NUDOCS-ABSTRACT10COPIESLTTRENCL11111111EXTERNAL:NOAC11NRCPDR11NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMP!-37(EXT.504-2083)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON"I'EED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR17ENCL16 FloridaPower&LightCompany,P.O.Box128,FortPierce,FL34854-0128February22,1995L-95-04010CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAttn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555RE:St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-.335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterPursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperatingLicensesDPR-67andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2,respectively,byincorporatingtheattachedTechnicalSpecifications(TS)revisions.Theproposedchangesareadministrativeinnatureinthatreferencetoan"automatic"containmentairlocktesterwillbedeletedfromTS4.6.1.3.Itisrequestedthattheproposedamendments,ifapproved,beissuedbySeptember1,1995,priortothenextscheduledrefuelingoutageforSt.LucieUnit2.Attachment1isanevaluationoftheproposedchanges.Attachment2isthe"DeterminationofNoSignificantHazardsConsideration."Attachments3and4containcopiesoftheappropriatetechnicalspecificationspagesmarkeduptoshowtheproposedchanges.TheproposedamendmentshavebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFPLCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordancewith10CFR50.91(b)(1),copiesoftheproposedamendmentsarebeingforwardedtotheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestionsaboutthissubmittal.Verytrulyyours,D.A.VicerSt.LugersidentePlantDAS/RLDAttachmentsccrcStewartD.Ebneter,RegionalAdministrator,RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector,USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti,FloridaDepartmentofHealthandRehabilitative'Services.9505010192950222PDRADDDK05000555anI-pL't1rdap~corrrpaf~ypPDR St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentslContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Page2))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~D.A.Sagerbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident,St.LuciePlantfortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower&LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoingdocument;thatthestatementsmadeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge,informationandbelief,andthatheisauthorizedtoexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.A.agerSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOF5(~LUACTheforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethisZZ<<~dayofI+~~,19l5byD.A.Sager,whoispersonallyknowntomeandwhodidtakeanoath.KR-R.e>~WL~iNameofNotaryPublicMyCommissionexpires+-fgCommissionNo.ClZ~~tZ.A~gllllltp~KARENWESTi'YCOMMISSIONfOO359928EXPIRESAprl18,1998CQ'g'ORXOTIaUTA&fgg~gg.  
ApplicationforamendstolicensesDPR-67&NPF-16,deletingrefstoautomatictester.forcontainmentpersonnelairlockfromTS4.6.1.3.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTRlENCLLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTESRECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD2-2LANORRIS,JINTERNAL:ACRSNRR/DRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXBOGC/HDS3COPIESLTTRENCL111166~FILECENTER0>11NRR/DSSA/SPLB11NUDOCS-ABSTRACT10COPIESLTTRENCL11111111EXTERNAL:NOAC11NRCPDR11NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMP!-37(EXT.504-2083)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON"I'EED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR17ENCL16 FloridaPower&LightCompany,P.O.Box128,FortPierce,FL34854-0128February22,1995L-95-04010CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAttn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555RE:St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-.335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterPursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperatingLicensesDPR-67andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2,respectively,byincorporatingtheattachedTechnicalSpecifications(TS)revisions.Theproposedchangesareadministrativeinnatureinthatreferencetoan"automatic"containmentairlocktesterwillbedeletedfromTS4.6.1.3.Itisrequestedthattheproposedamendments,ifapproved,beissuedbySeptember1,1995,priortothenextscheduledrefuelingoutageforSt.LucieUnit2.Attachment1isanevaluationoftheproposedchanges.Attachment2isthe"DeterminationofNoSignificantHazardsConsideration."Attachments3and4containcopiesoftheappropriatetechnicalspecificationspagesmarkeduptoshowtheproposedchanges.TheproposedamendmentshavebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFPLCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordancewith10CFR50.91(b)(1),copiesoftheproposedamendmentsarebeingforwardedtotheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestionsaboutthissubmittal.Verytrulyyours,D.A.VicerSt.LugersidentePlantDAS/RLDAttachmentsccrcStewartD.Ebneter,RegionalAdministrator,RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector,USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti,FloridaDepartmentofHealthandRehabilitative'Services.9505010192950222PDRADDDK05000555anI-pL't1rdap~corrrpaf~ypPDR St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentslContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Page2))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~D.A.Sagerbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident,St.LuciePlantfortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower&LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoingdocument;thatthestatementsmadeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge,informationandbelief,andthatheisauthorizedtoexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.A.agerSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOF5(~LUACTheforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethisZZ<<~dayofI+~~,19l5byD.A.Sager,whoispersonallyknowntomeandwhodidtakeanoath.KR-R.e>~WL~iNameofNotaryPublicMyCommissionexpires+-fgCommissionNo.ClZ~~tZ.A~gllllltp~KARENWESTi'YCOMMISSIONfOO359928EXPIRESAprl18,1998CQ'g'ORXOTIaUTA&fgg~gg.  
"'I$,'tt>>1IL'IIII,It''t~II't'IVtt St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockutomaticTesterATTACHMENT1EVALUATIONOPPROPOSEDTSCHANGES St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment1Page1of2EVALUATIONOPPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroductionFloridaPowerandLightCompany(FPL)requeststhatAppendixAofFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1(PSL1)andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)berevisedtodeletereferencestotheautomatictesterforthecontainmentpersonnelairlock.FPLhasdiscontinuedusingtheautomaticleakagemeasurementsystemsandhasnoplanstousetheminthefuture.Thesystemsarenotsafetyrelatedandarescheduledforremovalinaccordancewithapprovedplantprocedures.PSL1andPSL2ProosedTechnicalSecificationTSChanesTS3/4.6.1.3providesoperabilityandsurveillancerequirements(SR)forthecontainmentairlocksand,inpart,requiresthatsealleakagebedeterminedbyprecisionflowmeasurementwhenthevolumebetweenthedoorsealsispressurizedtothespecifiedpressure.Specifically,SR4.6.1.3.a.lstates(PSL2valueinparenthesis):"Forthepersonnelairlock,greaterthanorequaltoP39.6(41.8)psigforatleast15minutesifnottestedwiththeautomatictester."ForSR4.6.1.3.a.1:Deletethewords,"ifnottestedwiththeautomatictester"BackroundApprovedplantproceduresareusedtoperformairlocktestingandincludespecificinstructionsfortheuseofaportablelocalleakrate(LLRT)cart,ortheautomaticleakratetester,tochecktheintegrityofthesealsforpersonnelairlockinnerandouterdoors.EithertestmethodiscapableofdemonstratingoperabilitypursuanttoSR4.6.1.3.a.l.EachPSLunithasanautomatictesterthatisdesignedasadedicatedsystemtoautomaticallyinitiateatestsequenceupondoorclosure,orbymanualswitchactuation.Thesystemfunctionistopressurizetheintra-sealvolumetoapresetpressureand St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment1Page2of2monitortheairflownecessarytomaintainthatpressure.Alltimingfunctionsandcalibrationvaluesformeasuringleakageareuserprogrammable.Leaktest"trouble"alarmsareactuatedinthecontrolroomtoannunciateatestfailureand/orfailureofthesystemtooperateproperly.ThesamemodelautomatictesterisinstalledateachPSLunit.Thetesterisnotsafetyrelated,isnotusedtomaintainairlockintegrity,andthetubinginstalledtopressurizetheintra-sealvolumedoesnotpenetratethecontainmentatmosphereboundary.BasesfortheProosedChanesPersistentdifficultieshavebeenexperiencedwithoperationoftheautomatictestingsystemsforthecontainmentpersonnelairlocksforbothSt.LucieUnits1and2.Theseoperationaldifficultiesincludeinitiationofdistracting"nuisancealarms"inthecontrolroomsand,asaresult,thesystemsarenolongerused.FPLhasnoplanstousetheautomatictestersinthefuture,andhasscheduledthemforremovalusingapproved,plantconfigurationcontrolprocedures.TS3/4.6.1.3specifiesLimitingConditionsforOperation(LCO)fortheContainmentAirLocks.Surveillancetestingofairlocksealsprovidesassurancethattheoverallairlockleakagewillnotbecomeexcessiveduetosealdamageduringtheintervalsbetweenleakagetests.Therequiredtestintervals,testpressure,andleakageacceptancecriteriaarenotbeingchangedbytheproposedlicenseamendment.Thecontainmentpersonnelairlockautomaticleakratetesterisonlyonemethodofverifyingsealleakage.Automatictestingisnotrequiredtodemonstrateoperabilityoftheairlocks,orotherwiserequiredtocomplywiththespecificationsoftheLCO.ConclusionTheproposedTSrevisiondoesnotaltertheoperabilityrequirementsforthecontainmentairlocks;rather,onlythereferencetoanautomatictester(whichisnotrequiredforcompliancewiththetestcriteria)willbedeleted.Therefore,FPLconsiderstheproposedchangetobeadministrativeinnature.
"'I$,'tt>>1IL'IIII,It''t~II't'IVtt St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockutomaticTesterATTACHMENT1EVALUATIONOPPROPOSEDTSCHANGES St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment1Page1of2EVALUATIONOPPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroductionFloridaPowerandLightCompany(FPL)requeststhatAppendixAofFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1(PSL1)andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)berevisedtodeletereferencestotheautomatictesterforthecontainmentpersonnelairlock.FPLhasdiscontinuedusingtheautomaticleakagemeasurementsystemsandhasnoplanstousetheminthefuture.Thesystemsarenotsafetyrelatedandarescheduledforremovalinaccordancewithapprovedplantprocedures.PSL1andPSL2ProosedTechnicalSecificationTSChanesTS3/4.6.1.3providesoperabilityandsurveillancerequirements(SR)forthecontainmentairlocksand,inpart,requiresthatsealleakagebedeterminedbyprecisionflowmeasurementwhenthevolumebetweenthedoorsealsispressurizedtothespecifiedpressure.Specifically,SR4.6.1.3.a.lstates(PSL2valueinparenthesis):"Forthepersonnelairlock,greaterthanorequaltoP39.6(41.8)psigforatleast15minutesifnottestedwiththeautomatictester."ForSR4.6.1.3.a.1:Deletethewords,"ifnottestedwiththeautomatictester"BackroundApprovedplantproceduresareusedtoperformairlocktestingandincludespecificinstructionsfortheuseofaportablelocalleakrate(LLRT)cart,ortheautomaticleakratetester,tochecktheintegrityofthesealsforpersonnelairlockinnerandouterdoors.EithertestmethodiscapableofdemonstratingoperabilitypursuanttoSR4.6.1.3.a.l.EachPSLunithasanautomatictesterthatisdesignedasadedicatedsystemtoautomaticallyinitiateatestsequenceupondoorclosure,orbymanualswitchactuation.Thesystemfunctionistopressurizetheintra-sealvolumetoapresetpressureand St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment1Page2of2monitortheairflownecessarytomaintainthatpressure.Alltimingfunctionsandcalibrationvaluesformeasuringleakageareuserprogrammable.Leaktest"trouble"alarmsareactuatedinthecontrolroomtoannunciateatestfailureand/orfailureofthesystemtooperateproperly.ThesamemodelautomatictesterisinstalledateachPSLunit.Thetesterisnotsafetyrelated,isnotusedtomaintainairlockintegrity,andthetubinginstalledtopressurizetheintra-sealvolumedoesnotpenetratethecontainmentatmosphereboundary.BasesfortheProosedChanesPersistentdifficultieshavebeenexperiencedwithoperationoftheautomatictestingsystemsforthecontainmentpersonnelairlocksforbothSt.LucieUnits1and2.Theseoperationaldifficultiesincludeinitiationofdistracting"nuisancealarms"inthecontrolroomsand,asaresult,thesystemsarenolongerused.FPLhasnoplanstousetheautomatictestersinthefuture,andhasscheduledthemforremovalusingapproved,plantconfigurationcontrolprocedures.TS3/4.6.1.3specifiesLimitingConditionsforOperation(LCO)fortheContainmentAirLocks.Surveillancetestingofairlocksealsprovidesassurancethattheoverallairlockleakagewillnotbecomeexcessiveduetosealdamageduringtheintervalsbetweenleakagetests.Therequiredtestintervals,testpressure,andleakageacceptancecriteriaarenotbeingchangedbytheproposedlicenseamendment.Thecontainmentpersonnelairlockautomaticleakratetesterisonlyonemethodofverifyingsealleakage.Automatictestingisnotrequiredtodemonstrateoperabilityoftheairlocks,orotherwiserequiredtocomplywiththespecificationsoftheLCO.ConclusionTheproposedTSrevisiondoesnotaltertheoperabilityrequirementsforthecontainmentairlocks;rather,onlythereferencetoanautomatictester(whichisnotrequiredforcompliancewiththetestcriteria)willbedeleted.Therefore,FPLconsiderstheproposedchangetobeadministrativeinnature.
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterATTACHMENT2DETERMINATIONOFNOSIGNIFICANTHMARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment2Page1of2DETERMZNATZONOPNOSZGNZPZCANTHAZARDSCONSZDERATZONPursuantto10CFR50.92,adeterminationmaybemadethataproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsiderationifoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewith.theproposedamendmentwouldnot:(1)involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(2)createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(3)involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussedasfollows:(1)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedamendmentisadministrativeinnatureinthattherevisionwilleliminatethewordingassociatedwithoptionaluseofthepersonnelairlockautomaticleakagetester.TherequirementfortestingthepersonnelairlockatapressuregreaterthanorequaltoP,foratleast15minutesremainsunchanged.Theacceptancecriteriaofpersonnelairlocksealleakagelessthan0.01L,isalsounchanged.Theautomaticleakagetesterisnotanaccidentinitiatornorapartofthesuccesspath(s)whichfunctiontomitigateaccidentsevaluatedintheplantsafetyanalyses.Theproposaldoesnotinvolveanychangestotheconfigurationormethodofoperationofanyplantequipmentthatisusedtomitigatetheconsequencesofanaccident,nordoesitalteranyassumptionsorconditionsintheplantsafetyanalyses.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(2)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedamendmenttoremovethereferencetothepersonnelairlockautomatictesterfromthetechnicalspecificationswillnotintroduceanynewfailuremodesorsysteminteractions,norwillit St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment2Page2of2requiretheinstallationofanynewormodifiedequipment.Therequirementtoleaktestthepersonnelairlockswillnotbechanged.Thus,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(3)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Theproposedamendmentisadministrativeinnatureinthatiteliminatesthereferencetothepersonnelairlockautomaticleakagetesterbutdoesnotalterthesurveillanceandacceptancecriteriaforsuchtesting.Sealleakagetestingisperformedinaccordancewithanapprovedplantprocedurewhichallowsuseofeitheranautomatictesteroraportabletestingcart.Theautomaticleakagetesterisnotusedtoactuatesafetyrelatedequipment,provideinterlocks,orperformplantcontrolfunctions.Theconditionsevaluated-intheplantaccidentandtransientanalysesdonotinvolvethistester.Theproposedchangedoesnotalterthebasisforanytechnicalspecificationthatisrelatedtotheestablishmentof,orthemaintenanceof,anuclearsafetymargin.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentdoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.BasedontheabovediscussionandthesupportingEvaluationofTechnicalSpecificationchanges,FPLhasdeterminedthattheproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsideration.  
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterATTACHMENT2DETERMINATIONOFNOSIGNIFICANTHMARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment2Page1of2DETERMZNATZONOPNOSZGNZPZCANTHAZARDSCONSZDERATZONPursuantto10CFR50.92,adeterminationmaybemadethataproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsiderationifoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewith.theproposedamendmentwouldnot:(1)involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(2)createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(3)involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussedasfollows:(1)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedamendmentisadministrativeinnatureinthattherevisionwilleliminatethewordingassociatedwithoptionaluseofthepersonnelairlockautomaticleakagetester.TherequirementfortestingthepersonnelairlockatapressuregreaterthanorequaltoP,foratleast15minutesremainsunchanged.Theacceptancecriteriaofpersonnelairlocksealleakagelessthan0.01L,isalsounchanged.Theautomaticleakagetesterisnotanaccidentinitiatornorapartofthesuccesspath(s)whichfunctiontomitigateaccidentsevaluatedintheplantsafetyanalyses.Theproposaldoesnotinvolveanychangestotheconfigurationormethodofoperationofanyplantequipmentthatisusedtomitigatetheconsequencesofanaccident,nordoesitalteranyassumptionsorconditionsintheplantsafetyanalyses.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(2)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedamendmenttoremovethereferencetothepersonnelairlockautomatictesterfromthetechnicalspecificationswillnotintroduceanynewfailuremodesorsysteminteractions,norwillit St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment2Page2of2requiretheinstallationofanynewormodifiedequipment.Therequirementtoleaktestthepersonnelairlockswillnotbechanged.Thus,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(3)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Theproposedamendmentisadministrativeinnatureinthatiteliminatesthereferencetothepersonnelairlockautomaticleakagetesterbutdoesnotalterthesurveillanceandacceptancecriteriaforsuchtesting.Sealleakagetestingisperformedinaccordancewithanapprovedplantprocedurewhichallowsuseofeitheranautomatictesteroraportabletestingcart.Theautomaticleakagetesterisnotusedtoactuatesafetyrelatedequipment,provideinterlocks,orperformplantcontrolfunctions.Theconditionsevaluated-intheplantaccidentandtransientanalysesdonotinvolvethistester.Theproposedchangedoesnotalterthebasisforanytechnicalspecificationthatisrelatedtotheestablishmentof,orthemaintenanceof,anuclearsafetymargin.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentdoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.BasedontheabovediscussionandthesupportingEvaluationofTechnicalSpecificationchanges,FPLhasdeterminedthattheproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsideration.}}
}}

Revision as of 16:38, 18 May 2018

Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,deleting Refs to Automatic Tester for Containment Personnel Air Lock from TS 4.6.1.3
ML17228B031
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/22/1995
From: SAGER D A
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17228B032 List:
References
L-95-040, L-95-40, NUDOCS 9503010192
Download: ML17228B031 (10)


Text

PR.IC3R.I"O'Y'CCELERATEDRIDSPROCESSING)~,~REGULATORYINFORMATIONDISTRIBUTIONSYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSIONNBR:9503010192DOC.DATE:95/02/22NOTARIZED:YESFACIL:50-335St.LuciePlant,Unit1,FloridaPower&LightCo.50-389St.LuciePlant,Unit2,FloridaPower&LightCo.AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONSAGER,D.A.FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONDocumentControlBranch(DocumentControlDesk)DOCKET0500033505000389

SUBJECT:

ApplicationforamendstolicensesDPR-67&NPF-16,deletingrefstoautomatictester.forcontainmentpersonnelairlockfromTS4.6.1.3.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTRlENCLLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTESRECIPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD2-2LANORRIS,JINTERNAL:ACRSNRR/DRCH/HICBNRR/DSSA/SRXBOGC/HDS3COPIESLTTRENCL111166~FILECENTER0>11NRR/DSSA/SPLB11NUDOCS-ABSTRACT10COPIESLTTRENCL11111111EXTERNAL:NOAC11NRCPDR11NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMP!-37(EXT.504-2083)TOELIMINATEYOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTIONLISTSFORDOCUMENTSYOUDON"I'EED!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR17ENCL16 FloridaPower&LightCompany,P.O.Box128,FortPierce,FL34854-0128February22,1995L-95-04010CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAttn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555RE:St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-.335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterPursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperatingLicensesDPR-67andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2,respectively,byincorporatingtheattachedTechnicalSpecifications(TS)revisions.Theproposedchangesareadministrativeinnatureinthatreferencetoan"automatic"containmentairlocktesterwillbedeletedfromTS4.6.1.3.Itisrequestedthattheproposedamendments,ifapproved,beissuedbySeptember1,1995,priortothenextscheduledrefuelingoutageforSt.LucieUnit2.Attachment1isanevaluationoftheproposedchanges.Attachment2isthe"DeterminationofNoSignificantHazardsConsideration."Attachments3and4containcopiesoftheappropriatetechnicalspecificationspagesmarkeduptoshowtheproposedchanges.TheproposedamendmentshavebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFPLCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordancewith10CFR50.91(b)(1),copiesoftheproposedamendmentsarebeingforwardedtotheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestionsaboutthissubmittal.Verytrulyyours,D.A.VicerSt.LugersidentePlantDAS/RLDAttachmentsccrcStewartD.Ebneter,RegionalAdministrator,RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector,USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti,FloridaDepartmentofHealthandRehabilitative'Services.9505010192950222PDRADDDK05000555anI-pL't1rdap~corrrpaf~ypPDR St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentslContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Page2))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~D.A.Sagerbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident,St.LuciePlantfortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower&LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoingdocument;thatthestatementsmadeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge,informationandbelief,andthatheisauthorizedtoexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.A.agerSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOF5(~LUACTheforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethisZZ<<~dayofI+~~,19l5byD.A.Sager,whoispersonallyknowntomeandwhodidtakeanoath.KR-R.e>~WL~iNameofNotaryPublicMyCommissionexpires+-fgCommissionNo.ClZ~~tZ.A~gllllltp~KARENWESTi'YCOMMISSIONfOO359928EXPIRESAprl18,1998CQ'g'ORXOTIaUTA&fgg~gg.

"'I$,'tt>>1IL'IIII,Itt~II't'IVtt St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockutomaticTesterATTACHMENT1EVALUATIONOPPROPOSEDTSCHANGES St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment1Page1of2EVALUATIONOPPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroductionFloridaPowerandLightCompany(FPL)requeststhatAppendixAofFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1(PSL1)andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)berevisedtodeletereferencestotheautomatictesterforthecontainmentpersonnelairlock.FPLhasdiscontinuedusingtheautomaticleakagemeasurementsystemsandhasnoplanstousetheminthefuture.Thesystemsarenotsafetyrelatedandarescheduledforremovalinaccordancewithapprovedplantprocedures.PSL1andPSL2ProosedTechnicalSecificationTSChanesTS3/4.6.1.3providesoperabilityandsurveillancerequirements(SR)forthecontainmentairlocksand,inpart,requiresthatsealleakagebedeterminedbyprecisionflowmeasurementwhenthevolumebetweenthedoorsealsispressurizedtothespecifiedpressure.Specifically,SR4.6.1.3.a.lstates(PSL2valueinparenthesis):"Forthepersonnelairlock,greaterthanorequaltoP39.6(41.8)psigforatleast15minutesifnottestedwiththeautomatictester."ForSR4.6.1.3.a.1:Deletethewords,"ifnottestedwiththeautomatictester"BackroundApprovedplantproceduresareusedtoperformairlocktestingandincludespecificinstructionsfortheuseofaportablelocalleakrate(LLRT)cart,ortheautomaticleakratetester,tochecktheintegrityofthesealsforpersonnelairlockinnerandouterdoors.EithertestmethodiscapableofdemonstratingoperabilitypursuanttoSR4.6.1.3.a.l.EachPSLunithasanautomatictesterthatisdesignedasadedicatedsystemtoautomaticallyinitiateatestsequenceupondoorclosure,orbymanualswitchactuation.Thesystemfunctionistopressurizetheintra-sealvolumetoapresetpressureand St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment1Page2of2monitortheairflownecessarytomaintainthatpressure.Alltimingfunctionsandcalibrationvaluesformeasuringleakageareuserprogrammable.Leaktest"trouble"alarmsareactuatedinthecontrolroomtoannunciateatestfailureand/orfailureofthesystemtooperateproperly.ThesamemodelautomatictesterisinstalledateachPSLunit.Thetesterisnotsafetyrelated,isnotusedtomaintainairlockintegrity,andthetubinginstalledtopressurizetheintra-sealvolumedoesnotpenetratethecontainmentatmosphereboundary.BasesfortheProosedChanesPersistentdifficultieshavebeenexperiencedwithoperationoftheautomatictestingsystemsforthecontainmentpersonnelairlocksforbothSt.LucieUnits1and2.Theseoperationaldifficultiesincludeinitiationofdistracting"nuisancealarms"inthecontrolroomsand,asaresult,thesystemsarenolongerused.FPLhasnoplanstousetheautomatictestersinthefuture,andhasscheduledthemforremovalusingapproved,plantconfigurationcontrolprocedures.TS3/4.6.1.3specifiesLimitingConditionsforOperation(LCO)fortheContainmentAirLocks.Surveillancetestingofairlocksealsprovidesassurancethattheoverallairlockleakagewillnotbecomeexcessiveduetosealdamageduringtheintervalsbetweenleakagetests.Therequiredtestintervals,testpressure,andleakageacceptancecriteriaarenotbeingchangedbytheproposedlicenseamendment.Thecontainmentpersonnelairlockautomaticleakratetesterisonlyonemethodofverifyingsealleakage.Automatictestingisnotrequiredtodemonstrateoperabilityoftheairlocks,orotherwiserequiredtocomplywiththespecificationsoftheLCO.ConclusionTheproposedTSrevisiondoesnotaltertheoperabilityrequirementsforthecontainmentairlocks;rather,onlythereferencetoanautomatictester(whichisnotrequiredforcompliancewiththetestcriteria)willbedeleted.Therefore,FPLconsiderstheproposedchangetobeadministrativeinnature.

St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterATTACHMENT2DETERMINATIONOFNOSIGNIFICANTHMARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment2Page1of2DETERMZNATZONOPNOSZGNZPZCANTHAZARDSCONSZDERATZONPursuantto10CFR50.92,adeterminationmaybemadethataproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsiderationifoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewith.theproposedamendmentwouldnot:(1)involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(2)createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(3)involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussedasfollows:(1)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedamendmentisadministrativeinnatureinthattherevisionwilleliminatethewordingassociatedwithoptionaluseofthepersonnelairlockautomaticleakagetester.TherequirementfortestingthepersonnelairlockatapressuregreaterthanorequaltoP,foratleast15minutesremainsunchanged.Theacceptancecriteriaofpersonnelairlocksealleakagelessthan0.01L,isalsounchanged.Theautomaticleakagetesterisnotanaccidentinitiatornorapartofthesuccesspath(s)whichfunctiontomitigateaccidentsevaluatedintheplantsafetyanalyses.Theproposaldoesnotinvolveanychangestotheconfigurationormethodofoperationofanyplantequipmentthatisusedtomitigatetheconsequencesofanaccident,nordoesitalteranyassumptionsorconditionsintheplantsafetyanalyses.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(2)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedamendmenttoremovethereferencetothepersonnelairlockautomatictesterfromthetechnicalspecificationswillnotintroduceanynewfailuremodesorsysteminteractions,norwillit St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentsContainmentAirLockAutomaticTesterL-95-040Attachment2Page2of2requiretheinstallationofanynewormodifiedequipment.Therequirementtoleaktestthepersonnelairlockswillnotbechanged.Thus,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(3)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Theproposedamendmentisadministrativeinnatureinthatiteliminatesthereferencetothepersonnelairlockautomaticleakagetesterbutdoesnotalterthesurveillanceandacceptancecriteriaforsuchtesting.Sealleakagetestingisperformedinaccordancewithanapprovedplantprocedurewhichallowsuseofeitheranautomatictesteroraportabletestingcart.Theautomaticleakagetesterisnotusedtoactuatesafetyrelatedequipment,provideinterlocks,orperformplantcontrolfunctions.Theconditionsevaluated-intheplantaccidentandtransientanalysesdonotinvolvethistester.Theproposedchangedoesnotalterthebasisforanytechnicalspecificationthatisrelatedtotheestablishmentof,orthemaintenanceof,anuclearsafetymargin.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentdoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.BasedontheabovediscussionandthesupportingEvaluationofTechnicalSpecificationchanges,FPLhasdeterminedthattheproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsideration.