ML20125B923: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 19: Line 19:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:~
{{#Wiki_filter:~
      ~                                -
April 22,1981
                                                                            '.. April 22,1981
~
()
()
              ~
~
ltE110RA'iDijM FOR:       File 8CA-36 FROM:                     Tracy Wiest, Audito         b Office 'of Inspe.ctor and luditor
ltE110RA'iDijM FOR:
    ~
File 8CA-36 b
FROM:
Tracy Wiest, Audito Office 'of Inspe.ctor and luditor
~


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
            '~
.GAO DRAFT REPORT ENTITLED "IMFROVEMENTS NEEDED IN NRC'S OFFICE OF INSPECTOR AND AUDITOR"
                                          .GAO DRAFT REPORT ENTITLED "IMFROVEMENTS NEEDED IN NRC'S OFFICE OF INSPECTOR AND AUDITOR" On April 21, 1981, Bob Baney of-GAO called to provide the following                     i, infor ation in response to our specific questions on the subject draft report.
'~
We had previously provided GAO with a list of 18 questions regarding additional information we felt was needed to prepare our response to the subject draft report. GA0 agreed to provide additional information only on questions 6, 8, and 15 (see attached questions). GAO had answered question ne=ber 17 in a meeting held between OIA and GAO on April 16, 1981.
On April 21, 1981, Bob Baney of-GAO called to provide the following i,
: 6. Page 13, paragraph 1, lines 4-6 "... we found that audit or investigative suggestions from cae group to the other were usually ignored or otherwise discounted."
infor ation in response to our specific questions on the subject draft report.
We had previously provided GAO with a list of 18 questions regarding additional information we felt was needed to prepare our response to the subject draft report.
GA0 agreed to provide additional information only on questions 6, 8, and 15 (see attached questions). GAO had answered question ne=ber 17 in a meeting held between OIA and GAO on April 16, 1981.
6.
Page 13, paragraph 1, lines 4-6
"... we found that audit or investigative suggestions from cae group to the other were usually ignored or otherwise discounted."
Question: Please provide specific cases in which GAO determined suggestions were ignored; discounted?
Question: Please provide specific cases in which GAO determined suggestions were ignored; discounted?
Answer:
Answer:
                --    Background Screening of Te:porary Security Personnel
Background Screening of Te:porary Security Personnel NRC Office of Personnel Contract by IE to Outside Party to Develop Position Dei:riptions for IE Employees Adequacy of NRC's Source !!aterial Data Base Reactor Safeguards Program Apparent Deficiency in Radiographer Testing Failure to Collect Fees for Searches in Response to FOIA Requests Retention of Guard Qualification and Training Records Safety Plan Weaknes'ses Inadequate Security System at the Trojan Plant Padding of Travel Vouchers 8506110599 850117 PDR FOIA BAUSERS4-415 PDR
                --    NRC Office of Personnel
-.mn-
                --    Contract by IE to Outside Party to Develop Position Dei:riptions for IE Employees
                --    Adequacy of NRC's Source !!aterial Data Base
                --    Reactor Safeguards Program                                         .
                --    Apparent Deficiency in Radiographer Testing
                --    Failure to Collect Fees for Searches in Response to FOIA Requests
                --    Retention of Guard Qualification and Training Records
                --    Safety Plan Weaknes'ses
                  --    Inadequate Security System at the Trojan Plant
                --    Padding of Travel Vouchers 8506110599 850117 PDR   FOIA BAUSERS4-415       PDR                                                   ,
                                            -.mn-


                .                  _ - .      ,            .m,         -. .      -- ..
.m,
                      . 8.             Page 19, paragraph 2, lines 6-7: "We found other instances where recommendations were nearly two years old and have not been followed up on by OIA."
. 8.
Page 19, paragraph 2, lines 6-7:
"We found other instances where recommendations were nearly two years old and have not been followed up on by OIA."
^
^
!                        Question: Which specific reports?
Question: Which specific reports?
Answer:               -
Answer:
t
t Review of Export Licensing Procedures Public Document Room j
                          --            Review of Export Licensing Procedures
Review of Consultant Services Review of the llse and Controls Over Long Distance Commercial Telephone Calls 55.
                          --            Public Document Room j                         --            Review of Consultant Services
Page 27, paragraph 2:
                          --            Review of the llse and Controls Over Long Distance Commercial Telephone Calls
In one case,... In another case..."
: 55.           Page 27, paragraph 2:       " In one case, .. . In another case. . ."
-l Question: Which two audits are these examples referring to?
-l                       Question: Which two audits are these examples referring to?
l
l
                  ' Answer:
' Answer:
1st case - Review of Travel Voucher Processing 2nd case - Review of Standardization Policy
1st case - Review of Travel Voucher Processing 2nd case - Review of Standardization Policy 17.
: 17.           Did GAO interview:                   .
Did GAO interview:
t;                                   .
t; Dircks.- no (talked to Cornell and Rehm)
Dircks .- no (talked to Cornell and Rehm)
Gossick - no Budnitz - maybe on phone Murley - yes Bickwit - no Stello - yes Denton yes Davis - yes Minogue - yes Smith - no i
:                                        Gossick - no                                                                   *
Abston - no McTiernan - no cc:
!                                        Budnitz - maybe on phone Murley - yes Bickwit - no Stello - yes Denton   yes Davis - yes Minogue - yes Smith - no i
Cummings Messenger Schnebelen Herr Boulden Gauthier 4
Abston - no                               -
Wiest i
McTiernan - no
1 ay---
!                        cc:           Cummings
-, ~
!                                        Messenger Schnebelen
w w-3.-r w
!-                                      Herr Boulden 4
v-y
Gauthier Wiest i
--ry yrvyv
1 ay---   - , ~             w   w- 3.-r     , w         v-           y --ry -  yrvyv - y y w- ev v ww
- y y
                                                                                                                              *w m~,r----- -MT -}}
w-ev v
ww
*w m~,r-----
-MT
-}}

Latest revision as of 21:54, 12 December 2024

Details Answers Provided by 810421 Telcon W/B Baney to Questions Re Gao Draft Rept, Improvements Needed in NRC Ofc of Inspector & Auditor. Specifics Provided Re Group Suggestions Ignored & Delayed Action on Rept Findings
ML20125B923
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 04/22/1981
From: Wiest T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA)
Shared Package
ML20125A606 List:
References
FOIA-84-415 NUDOCS 8506110599
Download: ML20125B923 (2)
v • d • e


Text

~

April 22,1981

~

()

~

ltE110RA'iDijM FOR:

File 8CA-36 b

FROM:

Tracy Wiest, Audito Office 'of Inspe.ctor and luditor

~

SUBJECT:

.GAO DRAFT REPORT ENTITLED "IMFROVEMENTS NEEDED IN NRC'S OFFICE OF INSPECTOR AND AUDITOR"

'~

On April 21, 1981, Bob Baney of-GAO called to provide the following i,

infor ation in response to our specific questions on the subject draft report.

We had previously provided GAO with a list of 18 questions regarding additional information we felt was needed to prepare our response to the subject draft report.

GA0 agreed to provide additional information only on questions 6, 8, and 15 (see attached questions). GAO had answered question ne=ber 17 in a meeting held between OIA and GAO on April 16, 1981.

6.

Page 13, paragraph 1, lines 4-6

"... we found that audit or investigative suggestions from cae group to the other were usually ignored or otherwise discounted."

Question: Please provide specific cases in which GAO determined suggestions were ignored; discounted?

Answer:

Background Screening of Te:porary Security Personnel NRC Office of Personnel Contract by IE to Outside Party to Develop Position Dei:riptions for IE Employees Adequacy of NRC's Source !!aterial Data Base Reactor Safeguards Program Apparent Deficiency in Radiographer Testing Failure to Collect Fees for Searches in Response to FOIA Requests Retention of Guard Qualification and Training Records Safety Plan Weaknes'ses Inadequate Security System at the Trojan Plant Padding of Travel Vouchers 8506110599 850117 PDR FOIA BAUSERS4-415 PDR

-.mn-

.m,

. 8.

Page 19, paragraph 2, lines 6-7:

"We found other instances where recommendations were nearly two years old and have not been followed up on by OIA."

^

Question: Which specific reports?

Answer:

t Review of Export Licensing Procedures Public Document Room j

Review of Consultant Services Review of the llse and Controls Over Long Distance Commercial Telephone Calls 55.

Page 27, paragraph 2:

In one case,... In another case..."

-l Question: Which two audits are these examples referring to?

l

' Answer:

1st case - Review of Travel Voucher Processing 2nd case - Review of Standardization Policy 17.

Did GAO interview:

t; Dircks.- no (talked to Cornell and Rehm)

Gossick - no Budnitz - maybe on phone Murley - yes Bickwit - no Stello - yes Denton yes Davis - yes Minogue - yes Smith - no i

Abston - no McTiernan - no cc:

Cummings Messenger Schnebelen Herr Boulden Gauthier 4

Wiest i

1 ay---

-, ~

w w-3.-r w

v-y

--ry yrvyv

- y y

w-ev v

ww

  • w m~,r-----

-MT

-

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20125B923&oldid=4280244"