IR 05000324/1997012: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StriderTol Bot change
StriderTol Bot change
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20203L051
| number = ML20198P023
| issue date = 02/13/1998
| issue date = 12/23/1997
| title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-324/97-12 & 50-325/97-12 Issued on 971208.NRC Considered Basis for Util Denial of Violation E & Concludes That Violation Occurred
| title = Discusses Insp Repts 50-324/97-12 & 50-325/97-12 Completed on 971113 & Forwards Nov.Enforcement Conference Held on 971219 to Discuss Violations Noted.List of Attendees & Presentation Matls Also Encl
| author name = Mallett B
| author name = Reyes L
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name = Hinnant C
| addressee name = Hinnant C
Line 10: Line 10:
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 50-324-97-12, 50-325-97-12, EA-98-057, EA-98-57, NUDOCS 9803050316
| document report number = 50-324-97-12, 50-325-97-12, EA-97-519, EA-97-520, NUDOCS 9801210305
| title reference date = 01-07-1998
| package number = ML20198P028
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 9
| page count = 46
}}
}}


Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:February 13, 1998
{{#Wiki_filter:___
 
_
==SUBJECT:==
.-
NRC INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 50-325/97 '
. _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.10 50-324/97-12
!
 
==Dear Mr. Hinnant:==
,
Thank you for your response of January 7,1998, to our Notice of Violation-issued on December 8, 1997, concerning activities conducted at your Brunswick
,
,
facility. We have examined your response and found that it meets the
'
'
requirements of 10 CFR 2.201.
!
 
In your response, you admitted Violations A-D and denied Violation E.
 
>
After careful consideration of the basis for your denial of Violation E, we
'have concluded.-for the reasons presented in the ^nclosure to this letter,
,
that the violation occurred as stated in'the Notice of Violation. Therefore, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.201(a) please submit to this office within 30 days of the date of this letter a written statement describing steps which have been taken to correct Violation E and the results achieved, corrective
'
'
steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and the date when full
-
compliance will be achieved.
We will examine the implementation of your actions to correct Violations A-D
*
during future-inspections.
;
We appreciate your cooperation.in this matter.
Sincerely
.
.
( Original signed by B. Mallett )
- '
Bruce-S. Mallett Deputy Regional Administrator Docket Nos. 50-323 50-324 License Nos. 'DPR-71. DPR-62 Er.alosure:
k
Evaluat' ns and Conclusions c
cc w/ encl: _'(Seepage 2)l E ADS $ o E S2
-
G PDR t
8'b
,
,
__
December 23, 1997
_
--
.-
_ _ _ _
 
...
-
.
.
._.
EA 97 519 EA 97 520
 
,
.-
'
Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. C. :
Vice President
-
-
'
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 10429-Southport, North Carolina 28461
.
.
.
SUBJECT:
*
NOTICE OF VIOLATION
.
CP&L
 
cc w/ enc 1:
Director Site Operations Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 10429 Southport, NC 28461 J. J. Lyash, Plant Manager Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 10429 Southport. NC 28461 D. B. Alexander. Manager Performance Evaluation and
-.atory Affairs OHS 7 Carolina Power & Light Company 412 S. Wilmington Street Raleigh. NC 27601 K. R. Jury, Manager Regulatory Affairs Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick Steam Electric Plant
'
'
P. O. Box 10429 Southport. NC 28461-0429 Wtiliam D. Johnson Vice President & Senior Counsel Carolina Power and Light Company P. O. Box-1551 Raleigh, NC 27602 Mel Fry, Acting Director Division of_ Radiation Protection N.~C. Department of Environmental Commerce & Natural Resources 3825 Barrett Drive Raleigh NC 27609-7721 Karen E. Long-Assistant Attorney General State of North Carolina P, 0. Box 629 Raleigh. NC 27602 (cc w/ encl-cont'd - See page 3)
(NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50 325, 324/97 12)
 
,
.
-
. - -... _ _.
.
.


.
==Dear Mr. Hinnant:==
CP&L
On November 8,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Brunswick facility.'
 
l The inspection included a review of your corrective actions for failure of a
(cc w/ encl cont'd)
Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff NCUC P. O. Box 29520 Raleigh NC 27626 0520 Public Service Commission State of South Carolina P. O. Box 11649 Columbia. SC 29211 Jerry W. Jones. Chairman Brunswick County Board of Commissioners P. O. Box 249 Bolivia. NC 28422 Dan E. Summers Emergency Management Coordinator New Hanover County Department of Emergency Management P. O. Box 1525 Wilmington, NC 28402 William H. Crowe. Mayor City of Southport 201 E. Moore Street Southpor+, NC 28461 Distribution w/ encl:
M. Shymlock Rll D. Trimble. NRR J. Lieberman. OE B. Summers. OE J. Colev RII R. Aiello. RII-
'J. Lenahan. RII
,
,
E. Testa. RII
Unit I drywell cooler fan and your actions to correct a design deficiency
-
;
D. Thompson RII PUBLIC NRC Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conrission 8470 River Road. SE Southport NC 28461-
affecting the pressure suppression design function of primary containment.
,
ik '.i
*'See previous concurrence 0*
b Ur t t CE -
Wil:DNP Ell:DEP 211:DRP Ril:DRP Ril:EICS Ril:DRP D J)[:N Ibbh
_
umK rE5 ream
'C9etterson
"tElecDonald
"N5hyistock
"ABe, Land
"JJohnson_ gifTho@ son DATE Z/
/95 Z/
/95 2/
/90 2/
/95 -
2/
/95 2/
/95 Z/ G /95
,
Lurir YE5 ND YE5 ED YE5 ND YE5 ND YE5 ND YES NO YE5 NO l
0FFICIAL REOMD COPf DDrtsEmi umpE: G:\\gau\\9712DENI.917
..


.. - - -
You were informed of the results of our inspection on November 13, 1997,' and the inspection report was sent to you by letter dated December 8,1997. An open predecisional enforcement conference was conducted in the Region II office on December 19, 1997, with you and members of your staff to discuss the apparent
_
. -.
.
.
-
violation, the root causes, and your corrective actions to preclude recurrence.
* A list of conference attendees NRC slides, and a copy of Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) _ presentation materials are enclosed.


.
Based on the information developed during the inspection and the information you provided during the conference, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requiremerits occurred. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (ko+W) and the circumstances sarrounding it are described in detail
;
<
CP&L
in the subject inspection resort. The violation involves the failure to take acsquate corrective action w1en the tem >erature of areas in the Unit I drywell exceeded the 221.7 degrees Farenheit ( ") temperature value prescribed by Engineering Lervice Reouest 96 397. Specifically, upon tailure of the 101
~ drywell cooler in Ane 1997, the effect of the subsequent temperature rise to 230*F on the seal life of snubbers near the reactor vessel head were not evaluated. As a result, +he calculated life expectancies of seven out of ten snubbers on the raactor head vent line were exceeded.


[
. As discussed at the predecisional enforcement conference, the condition was -
(cc w/enci cont'd)
identified by a CP&L engineer evaluating Unit 2 equipment qualification issues
Robert P. Gruber
/
Exec. tive Director
/
Public Staff NCUC P. O. Box 29520 Raleigh. NC 27626-0520 Public Service Commission
.
State of South Carolina-
*
P. O. Box 11649 Columbia, SC 29211 Jerry W. Jones Chairman Brunswick County Board of Commissioners P. O. Box 249 Bolivia, NC 28422 Dan E. Summers Emergency Management Coordinator New Hanover County Department of Emergency Management P. O. Box 1525 Wilmington, NC 28402 William H. Crowe, Mayor City of Southport 201 E. Moore Street Southport. NC 28461 Distribution w/ encl:
M. Shymlock, Ril D. Trimble, NRR J. Lieberman OE B. Summers. OE J. Coley, RII'
R. Aiello, RII J. Lenahan RII E. Testa, RII D. Thompson, RII PUBLIC NRC Resident Inspector U.- S. Nuclear Re'gulatory Commission-8470 River Road. SE Southport. NC-28461
* See previous concurrence UFFICE RII DRP Ell:1N RII:DRP Ril:DRP Ril:CICS
,, gy
,
,
51mTM gQ
ind the actual and potential safety significance of the inoperable snubbers was -
,
ty since analyses indicated that the restraints on the head vent lines were
. MfWE
.adeguate without the snubbers.- In addition, testing pe-formed on Unit 2 snuboers, exposed to similar high temperature conditions, indicated that the
"EBream
; Unit 1 snubbers probably wouM have performed their design function. Therefore,
"CPetterscri EL ld
)the violation has been categorized in accordance with the " General Statement of-
,unyieloc*
"A5oland
,'
*
DATE-2/
/95 2/
/95 2/
/95 2/
/95 2/
/95 2/ U
/95 7/
/95 wri r TE5 ED TE5 E
TEE
.L9 TE5 ND TES ND TES 11 0 TE5 NO OFFICIAL. RECORD COPY DOCL5ENT NAME: Ga\\RPS4%BRU\\9712DENI.917
-
-
-
-


.- -.
'
.
Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600, as a Severity Level IV violation. However, the NRC was concerned that the
-
{l
-
: engineering analysis justifying the deviation from.the Final Safety Analysis agg g
.
[~
ll lg gll ll u
um


__
CP&L
CP&L


(cc w/ enc 1 cont'd)
Report (FSAR) design limit was not updated when the actual plant conditions increased above the analyzed value.
Robert P. Gruber Executive Director Public Staff NCUC P. O. Box 295c0 Raleigh, NC 27626-0520 Public Service Commission State of South Carolina P. O. Box 11649 Columbia. SC 29211 Jerry W. Jones. Chairman Brunswick County Board of Commissioners P. O. Box 249 Bolivia, NC 28422 Dan E. Summers Emergency Management Coordinator New Hanover County Department of Emergency Management P. J. Box 1525 Wilmington, NC 28402 William H. Crowe, Mayor City of Southport 201 E. Moore Street Southport, NC 28461 Oh Distribution w/ encl:
Md. bg gi %
Wb M. Shymlock, RII D. Trimole. NRR j
J. Coley, RII R. Aiello. RII J. Lenahan RII E. Testa. RII D. Thompson. RII PUBLIC NRC Resident Insp ctor U. S. Nuclear Re ulatory Commission n,
8470 River Road SE V
28461


Southport. NC j j
The NRC was also concerned with the documentation and handling of the out of-specification drywell temperature. O rations wrsonnel were documenting the out of specfication condition on dail logs. T1e entries were routinely marked with a red pen indicating the res foun value was above the limit. The condition was accepted by Operations because an engineering analysis had been completed justifying a value higher than that described in the FSAR and the daily logs, However, the actual values prescribed by the engineering analysis, which were different for Unit I and 2, were not annotated on the logs. As a result, when
g
~ the Unit 1 drywell cooler failed, and drywell temperatures exceeded the analyzed values for Unit 1, Operations accepted the higher temperatures without a formal engineering evaluation of the effect on containment equipment.
* See previou concurrence UFFICE RII DRP Ell:DRP Ril'_DRP Ell:DRP pg
' ' ""E
*
*
*
wr (/ IR )
,
NAK liBream CPatterson 134ecDonald N5hyur16ck g
'
DATE 1/
/95-1/
/95 1/
/95 1/ p(J /95
' p /95 1/
/95 1/
/95 (IFY7 YE5 N0 YE5 ND YE5 NO YE5 NO (YE5 j NO YE5 NO YES NO
/
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCISIEdI MAE : G:\\BRU\\9712DEh!,917
\\,/
j


..
One example of the apparent violation identified in NRC Inspection Report
_. _.
=No. 50 325, 324/97 12 included inadequate corrective actions to ensure the
.
. _ _ _ _ _
_
__ _. _.
.. _ _.. _... _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_
Jf44-29-1990 10:34 tRC BRUISJ!CK 19104379134 P.01
*
.
/
!
CPR i
(CC W/enCI cont'd)
;
Robert P. Gruber
;
;
Executive Director Public Staff NCUC i
pressure suppression function of the torus was-adequate. Based on your presentation at the predecisional enforcement conference, the NRC concluded that-your corrective actions did adequately address the torus design issues identified at other sites and that when the specific design problem affecting Brunswick was identified, your corrective actions were timely. Therefore, this example of the apparent violation is withdrawn. As stated at the conference, the NRC is conducting a review of the generic implications of the torus design deficiency and will address the resolution of this issue and any associated enforcement action at a later date.
i P. O. Box 29520


Raleigh NC 27626-0520 t
You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.
Public Service Comission d
l State of South Carolin-P. O. Box 11649 Coluncia. SC 29211
,
Jerry W. Jones. Cha an rd of Brunswick County /
Comissioners F. O. Box 249
/
Bolivia. NC


'
In your response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence of the violations. After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.
Den E. Sume Emergency Man gement Coordinator New Hanover nty Department of Emergene nap
'
P. O. kx


.'
Wtimingt NC 28402
,
,
W1:11am. Crowe, Mayor
'
'
:
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
C1ty of outhport
;
201 E.


re Street Sout
Sincerely
. NC 28461
.
Original signed by Luis A. Reyes Luis A. Reyes Regional Administrator
,
,
31Staihutim Wunc1; i
.
(, 5 tymioc t. IL
Docket-Nos.- 50 325, 50 324
,
*
D. Tflable. NRR J.
License _Nos. OPR 71 DP M 2
~ Enclosures:
1.


oley, RIl R.
Notice of Violation 2.- List of Attendees-3.


tello, RII J..enahan, Ril
CP&L Presentation Materials 4.. NRC-Presentation Materials I
"
.cc w/encls: See page 3'
E. Testa. RII-
'
g
;
-.
-. -..
.
.
D Thompson, RII LIC
.-
,
-..
! Resident Inspector
- - -.
,
--,
u. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 8470 River Road. SE Southport, NC 28461
.
Sh f
,m i
853545W
;
"_ ;
",,, O
.4 -
u-v
-
-
v w.,.
--
IE C ;iiigpage,= =.infahmihr
---
"_
"
""
,
TOTAL P.01
.
.
..


_
_ _ _ _ - - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _
__
.
.
_
_
.
.
.. _. _
!
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.
.
.. _ _. _
'
'
w EVALUATIONS AND CONCLUSION
,-
,
CP&L
On December 8, 1998, a Notice of Violation (Notice) was issued for five violations identified during a routine NRC inspection.


Carolina Power & Light Company (CP&L) responded to the Notice on January 7. 1998.
!
!
cc w/encls:
Director Assistant Attorney General


The licensee admitted Violations A-0. but denied Violation E on the bases that the
Site Operations State of North Carolina
:
:
established procedural. controls, training, and qualifications of the security personnel monitoring the Central Access Point at the time of the events were adequate to detect unauthorized access into the protected area (PA).
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 629
!
o
. P. O. Box 10429-Raleigh, NC 27602 l
Southport, NC 28461 l
Executive Director
!
J. J. Lyash Public Staff NCUC q
Plant Mana9er P. O. Box 29520
-
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Raleigh, NC 27626 0520 Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 10429 Public Service Commission


The NRC's evaluations and conclusion regarding the licensee's arguments are as
Southport, NC 28461 State of South Carolina
>
P. O. Box 11649 t
0. B. Alexander. Manager Columbia, SC 29211
:
<
Performance Evaluation and
!
'
Regulatory Affairs OHS 7 Chairman
- Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick County Board of
'
412 S. Wilmington Street Commissioners
;
;
follows:
Raleigh, NC. 27601 P. O. Box 249
Restatement of Violation Technical Specification 6.8.1.d requires that written procedures shall be established. implemented, and maintained covering implementation of the Security Plan.
;
 
-
Physical Security Plan. Revision 1. August 1997, states that a Member of the Security Force (MSF) located within a bullet resistant structure is responsible for the final access control function.
Bolvia, NC 28422 K.-R. Jury, Manager
 
'
Security Instruction. 0S1-05 Security Post Duties. Responsibilities and Patrol Procedures, defines the responsibilities of the Access Control Person (ACP).
Regulatory Affairs Emergency Management Coordinator
:
Carolina Power & Light Company New Hanover County Department of
'
Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Emergency Management
;
P. O. Box 10429 P. O. Box 1525
'
Southport, NC 28461 0429 Wilmington, NC 28402 W. D. Johnson. Vice President Mayor and Senior Counsel City of Southport l
Carolina Power & Light Company 201 East Moore Street
!
P. O ' Box IE51 Southport, NC 28461 Raleigh, NC 27602
;
- Director Division of Radiation Protection
!
N. C. Dep& Natural Resources artment of Environmental
'
Health 3825 Barrett Drive
-
;
Raleigh, NC 27609 7721 P
;
1_
-
t f
,
,.
-
-.,. - -
,
,,,
n-
,,......,,...-,-..m,,,,,-
,,-l
-


.. _ -
- -
.
.
Contrary to the above, 0S1-05 failed to adequately define those actions required for the ACP to control the final access function into the protected area to prevent unauthorized access.
-
;
$
<
CP&L


Specifically. no guidance existed for controlling a condition on October 3 and again on Octobar 7, 1997 wherein the ACr> failed to lock down the Protected Area turnstiles or remove the second individual from the area during a conditio1 which could have allowed an
,
,
unauthorized individual to gain access into the PA.
Distribution w/encls:-
 
,.
Summary of Licensee's Pesconse to Violation E The licensee contends that the procedural controls training, and qualifications of the security personnel monitoring the Central Access Point
J. Lieberman. OE r
OE:EA File (BStamers.0E) (2 letterhead copies))
-A.-Boland, RII H.'Shynlock, RII-(IFS action required)
D. Trimble, NRR J
J.-Coley. RII R. Baldwin, RII-
'
J.'Lenahan, RII
*
*
(CAP) at the time of the events were adequate to detect unauthorized access
.W. Rankin, RII D. Thompson, RII-PUBLIC
'
into the protected area, and that the security personnel would have responded had an attempt been made.
 
The licensee indicated that the procedures controlling the CAP adequately defined the Final Access Control (FAC)
operator's responsibility in the event an unauthorized individual attem)ted to gain access.
 
The licensee interviewed the responsible FAC operators, w1o
-
-
attested that had an individual attempted to gain unauthorized access they would have locked the full-length turnstiles or requested response from other MSF. The licensee also credits training provided in November 1996 as addressing the locking of the full-length turnstile when two individuals were located between the half-length and full-length turnstiles.
NRC Resident Inspector.
 
!
Enclosure
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -
.
:8470 River Road. SE
..
'Southport, NC -28461
_
.
 
--
.
.
- - - -
.
.
-
-
- - - - - - - - -. -
-
-.
*
,
,
.
;
o i
i
'
NRC Evaluation of Licensee's Resoonse The NRC staff has carefully reviewed the licensee's response and determined that the procedural requirements did not provide adeguate guidance for the
'
situation observed to prevent unauthorized acces3.


Therefore, the Uritten procedure OSI-5 did not adequately implement this Security Plan access control function.
4 f
;
i
,
L-5fW TO PLSLIC MM, vt5'
OFFICF All d R!l!C F.
R M IIC 4 Ril:0R4 R!l:0RA uN cr N (dk
,,, e,,, '
unt u
an. net
,,,1 -
o,,
,,.
,,,
,,,
,,,


The licensee's response did not provide any additional information that changed the significance or validity of the violation.
.,
 
.
The licensee maintains that the procedures were adequate and the FAC operators acted in accordance with those procedures and training provided concerning this type situation.. The NRC does agree that the personnel serving as FAC
cervt vtsMol vrs - (m)
/vt0 m
vrs-m vts e
'
'
operators were qualified to man that station, that training describing this situation was provided in November 1996, and that 0S1-05 discusses the responsibility of PA access control to the FAC operator.
, OFFICIAL RECOR& CGPY - DOCLM NI TA K :M970 PEN,ENF\\975198RU.DIR\\ FINAL.


However 031-05 did
,
not contain actions for the FAC operator to intervene when more that one
'
'
i individual was in the area between the full-length and the half-length turnstiles.
.


In addition, the training provided was prior to the completion and site-wide utilizaticn of the Central Access Point in August 1997 and did not address this situation for the different configuration of the new access building, Therefore, considering the failure to address the configuration change during training and by observations of the situation on October 3, and
P i
:
s
7.- 1997 the inspector determined the training provided and procedure were not adequate to address this event.
--
 
NRC's review of the subsequent licensee's root cause analysis, the procedure revised as a result of the situation identified, and the PNSC meeting notes, support a finding that the procedural controls and training at the time of the
'
event were inadequate.
 
The licensee's Root Cause Condition Report 97-3964.
 
Plant Access Turnsti a Area, dated January 6, 1998, for this event stated that
,
'the one-half turnsta ies were introduced to enhance access control: however, this process change was not formally documented in plant procedures Security personnel instructions or site personnel training guides.
 
Failure to update these documents prior to introducing the onc-half turnstiles resulted in plant
*
personnel not understanding management ex3ectations." The corrective actions
 
reviewed by the NRC do not support that t1e procedures or training were.
 
edequate.
 
Corrective actions for this event included revision of the FAC operators lesson plan.and additional training on that plan, revision to 051-05, and an evaluation of the need to change the Initial / Retraining program E
to incorporate instructions for half-length turnstiles in the Central Access Building.. A review of OSI-05 revised January 1998 added unauthorized access
'to those situations required for FAC operator action.
 
Additionally, the Root c
Cause investigator when questioned by the Brunswick Plant Nuclear Safety Committee-(PNSC) during the December 18, 1997 meeting stated, as recorded in the PNSC minutes, that the security guards actions were not "what they were supposed to have done-their training had not been adequate to have them-control the situation in the right way."
 
Enclosure
-
_
-
-.
.
.
.
.
-
.- -
. - - -
.
.
. -
-..
- -
-..
-
-
-=
.. -
. -.-..
. _ - -,
- -. -
,.
.
 
The violation was issued based on inadequacies in a security procedure as evidenced by observed security personnel performance.
 
The NRC is in agreement with the licensee that no attempt at unauthorized access was made hv the individuals observed.
 
The security force had the responsibility tv determine the individuals authorization prior to the individuals gaining access to the facility, when confronted with two individuals inappropriately between the half-length turnstiles and the full-length turnstiles as required by Technical Specification 6.8.1 of the Security Plan. The NRC ins)ection observed that neither the applicable procedure nor the training on tie procedure adequately addressed the actual situation where two individuals were between the turnstiles. Therefore, the NRC has determined that procedural controls were not adequate to implement the Security Plan when two individuals were in the area between the half-length and full-length turnstiles.
 
NRC Conclusion For the above reasons, the NRC staff concludes that ',ae violation occurred as stated.
 
!
Enclosure
..
}}
}}

Revision as of 09:41, 10 December 2024

Discusses Insp Repts 50-324/97-12 & 50-325/97-12 Completed on 971113 & Forwards Nov.Enforcement Conference Held on 971219 to Discuss Violations Noted.List of Attendees & Presentation Matls Also Encl
ML20198P023
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  
Issue date: 12/23/1997
From: Reyes L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Hinnant C
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
Shared Package
ML20198P028 List:
References
50-324-97-12, 50-325-97-12, EA-97-519, EA-97-520, NUDOCS 9801210305
Download: ML20198P023 (46)


Text

___

_

.-

. _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

!

'

!

'

.

- '

k

,

December 23, 1997

.

EA 97 519 EA 97 520

,

'

Carolina Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. C. :

Vice President

-

'

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. 0. Box 10429-Southport, North Carolina 28461

.

SUBJECT:

NOTICE OF VIOLATION

'

(NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 50 325, 324/97 12)

.

Dear Mr. Hinnant:

On November 8,1997, the NRC completed an inspection at your Brunswick facility.'

l The inspection included a review of your corrective actions for failure of a

,

Unit I drywell cooler fan and your actions to correct a design deficiency

affecting the pressure suppression design function of primary containment.

You were informed of the results of our inspection on November 13, 1997,' and the inspection report was sent to you by letter dated December 8,1997. An open predecisional enforcement conference was conducted in the Region II office on December 19, 1997, with you and members of your staff to discuss the apparent

.

violation, the root causes, and your corrective actions to preclude recurrence.

  • A list of conference attendees NRC slides, and a copy of Carolina Power and Light Company's (CP&L) _ presentation materials are enclosed.

Based on the information developed during the inspection and the information you provided during the conference, the NRC has determined that a violation of NRC requiremerits occurred. The violation is cited in the enclosed Notice of Violation (ko+W) and the circumstances sarrounding it are described in detail

<

in the subject inspection resort. The violation involves the failure to take acsquate corrective action w1en the tem >erature of areas in the Unit I drywell exceeded the 221.7 degrees Farenheit ( ") temperature value prescribed by Engineering Lervice Reouest 96 397. Specifically, upon tailure of the 101

~ drywell cooler in Ane 1997, the effect of the subsequent temperature rise to 230*F on the seal life of snubbers near the reactor vessel head were not evaluated. As a result, +he calculated life expectancies of seven out of ten snubbers on the raactor head vent line were exceeded.

. As discussed at the predecisional enforcement conference, the condition was -

identified by a CP&L engineer evaluating Unit 2 equipment qualification issues

,

ind the actual and potential safety significance of the inoperable snubbers was -

ty since analyses indicated that the restraints on the head vent lines were

.adeguate without the snubbers.- In addition, testing pe-formed on Unit 2 snuboers, exposed to similar high temperature conditions, indicated that the

Unit 1 snubbers probably wouM have performed their design function. Therefore,

)the violation has been categorized in accordance with the " General Statement of-

'

Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions" (Enforcement Policy), NUREG-1600, as a Severity Level IV violation. However, the NRC was concerned that the

{l

engineering analysis justifying the deviation from.the Final Safety Analysis agg g

[~

ll lg gll ll u

um

__

CP&L

Report (FSAR) design limit was not updated when the actual plant conditions increased above the analyzed value.

The NRC was also concerned with the documentation and handling of the out of-specification drywell temperature. O rations wrsonnel were documenting the out of specfication condition on dail logs. T1e entries were routinely marked with a red pen indicating the res foun value was above the limit. The condition was accepted by Operations because an engineering analysis had been completed justifying a value higher than that described in the FSAR and the daily logs, However, the actual values prescribed by the engineering analysis, which were different for Unit I and 2, were not annotated on the logs. As a result, when

~ the Unit 1 drywell cooler failed, and drywell temperatures exceeded the analyzed values for Unit 1, Operations accepted the higher temperatures without a formal engineering evaluation of the effect on containment equipment.

One example of the apparent violation identified in NRC Inspection Report

=No. 50 325, 324/97 12 included inadequate corrective actions to ensure the

pressure suppression function of the torus was-adequate. Based on your presentation at the predecisional enforcement conference, the NRC concluded that-your corrective actions did adequately address the torus design issues identified at other sites and that when the specific design problem affecting Brunswick was identified, your corrective actions were timely. Therefore, this example of the apparent violation is withdrawn. As stated at the conference, the NRC is conducting a review of the generic implications of the torus design deficiency and will address the resolution of this issue and any associated enforcement action at a later date.

You are required to respond to this letter and should follow the instructions specified in the enclosed Notice when preparing your response.

In your response, you should document the specific actions taken and any additional actions you plan to prevent recurrence of the violations. After reviewing your response to this Notice, including your proposed corrective actions and the results of future inspections, the NRC will determine whether further NRC enforcement action is necessary to ensure compliance with NRC regulatory requirements.

'

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

Sincerely

.

Original signed by Luis A. Reyes Luis A. Reyes Regional Administrator

,

.

Docket-Nos.- 50 325, 50 324

License _Nos. OPR 71 DP M 2

~ Enclosures:

1.

Notice of Violation 2.- List of Attendees-3.

CP&L Presentation Materials 4.. NRC-Presentation Materials I

.cc w/encls: See page 3'

'

g

-.

-. -..

.

.-

-..

- - -.

--,

-

--

---

_ _ _ _ - - _ _. _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _

.

.

!

'

,-

CP&L

!

!

cc w/encls:

Director Assistant Attorney General

Site Operations State of North Carolina

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant P. O. Box 629

!

o

. P. O. Box 10429-Raleigh, NC 27602 l

Southport, NC 28461 l

Executive Director

!

J. J. Lyash Public Staff NCUC q

Plant Mana9er P. O. Box 29520

-

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Raleigh, NC 27626 0520 Carolina Power & Light Company P. O. Box 10429 Public Service Commission

Southport, NC 28461 State of South Carolina

>

P. O. Box 11649 t

0. B. Alexander. Manager Columbia, SC 29211

<

Performance Evaluation and

!

'

Regulatory Affairs OHS 7 Chairman

- Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick County Board of

'

412 S. Wilmington Street Commissioners

Raleigh, NC. 27601 P. O. Box 249

-

Bolvia, NC 28422 K.-R. Jury, Manager

'

Regulatory Affairs Emergency Management Coordinator

Carolina Power & Light Company New Hanover County Department of

'

Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Emergency Management

P. O. Box 10429 P. O. Box 1525

'

Southport, NC 28461 0429 Wilmington, NC 28402 W. D. Johnson. Vice President Mayor and Senior Counsel City of Southport l

Carolina Power & Light Company 201 East Moore Street

!

P. O ' Box IE51 Southport, NC 28461 Raleigh, NC 27602

- Director Division of Radiation Protection

!

N. C. Dep& Natural Resources artment of Environmental

'

Health 3825 Barrett Drive

-

Raleigh, NC 27609 7721 P

1_

-

t f

,

,.

-

-.,. - -

,

,,,

n-

,,......,,...-,-..m,,,,,-

,,-l

-

.. _ -

- -

.

-

$

<

CP&L

,

Distribution w/encls:-

,.

J. Lieberman. OE r

OE:EA File (BStamers.0E) (2 letterhead copies))

-A.-Boland, RII H.'Shynlock, RII-(IFS action required)

D. Trimble, NRR J

J.-Coley. RII R. Baldwin, RII-

'

J.'Lenahan, RII

.W. Rankin, RII D. Thompson, RII-PUBLIC

-

NRC Resident Inspector.

!

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

8470 River Road. SE

'Southport, NC -28461

-

,

i

4 f

i

,

L-5fW TO PLSLIC MM, vt5'

OFFICF All d R!l!C F.

R M IIC 4 Ril:0R4 R!l:0RA uN cr N (dk

,,, e,,, '

unt u

an. net

,,,1 -

o,,

,,.

,,,

,,,

,,,

.,

.

cervt vtsMol vrs - (m)

/vt0 m

vrs-m vts e

'

, OFFICIAL RECOR& CGPY - DOCLM NI TA K :M970 PEN,ENF\\975198RU.DIR\\ FINAL.

'

.

P i

s

--

.

.

.

-..

-..

-

.. -

. _ - -,