|
|
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| | Title = Advises of Change in Reportability for LER 89-003-00 Re 10 Containment Isolation Valves W/Excessive Leak Rates | | | Title = Advises of Change in Reportability for LER 89-003-00 Re 10 Containment Isolation Valves W/Excessive Leak Rates |
| | Plant = | | | Plant = |
| | Reporting criterion = | | | Reporting criterion = 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii), 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) |
| | Power level = | | | Power level = |
| | Mode = | | | Mode = |
| | Docket = 05000339 | | | Docket = 05000339 |
| | LER year = 2089 | | | LER year = 1989 |
| | LER number = 3 | | | LER number = 3 |
| | LER revision = | | | LER revision = 0 |
| | Event date = | | | Event date = |
| | Report date = | | | Report date = |
| Line 31: |
Line 31: |
|
| |
|
| =text= | | =text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:. - _. -- . . | | {{#Wiki_filter:. |
| j .. | | j VINGINIA EuiCTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Hicunoxo,VinatwiA cues: |
| VINGINIA EuiCTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Hicunoxo,VinatwiA cues: | | November 14,1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No. |
| November 14,1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No. 90 697 Attention: Document Control Desk NAPS /RCS:rcs R2 Washington, DC 20555 Docket No. 50-339 License No. NPF 7 Gentlemen: | | 90 697 Attention: Document Control Desk NAPS /RCS:rcs R2 Washington, DC 20555 Docket No. |
| | 50-339 License No. |
| | NPF 7 Gentlemen: |
| ylRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT 2 | | ylRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT 2 |
| ~ CHANGE IN REPORTABILITY
| | ~ CHANGE IN REPORTABILITY |
| ~ On March 23,1989, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted Licensee Event Report (LER) 89-003-00 for North Anna Unit 2. This LER documented ten containment .
| | ~ On March 23,1989, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted Licensee Event Report (LER) 89-003-00 for North Anna Unit 2. This LER documented ten containment. |
| Isolation-valves which exceeded the acceptable "as-found" leak rates for Type C testing. The LER treated the event as reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii) for an "... event or condition that resulted in the condition of the nuclear power plant, including its principal safety barriers, being seriously degraded ...." However, upon further consideration, we have determined this event to be not reportable. In the case of each valve which exceeded the 0.6 La acceptance criterion, either closed system ' 1 ' | | Isolation-valves which exceeded the acceptable "as-found" leak rates for Type C testing. The LER treated the event as reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii) for an "... event or condition that resulted in the condition of the nuclear power plant, including its principal safety barriers, being seriously degraded...." However, upon further consideration, we have determined this event to be not reportable. In the case of each valve which exceeded the 0.6 La acceptance criterion, either closed system ' |
| integrity or one operable isolation device existed which would have prevented direct leakage to the environment. Therefore, the penetrations remained operable and the containment isolation capability was not seriously degraded. | | 1 integrity or one operable isolation device existed which would have prevented direct leakage to the environment. Therefore, the penetrations remained operable and the containment isolation capability was not seriously degraded. |
| in addition, we have evaluated the event with respect to other relevant reporting i criteria of 10- CFR-50.73 and have determined them also to be not applicable. l Specifically,10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) states that any ev_ent or condition that alone | | in addition, we have evaluated the event with respect to other relevant reporting criteria of 10- CFR-50.73 and have determined them also to be not applicable. |
| ..could.have prevented the ful.fillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to control the release of radioactive materialis reportable. However,10 :1 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) allows that-Individual' component failures need not be reported l pursuant to paragraph 50.739i)(2)(v)(C) if redundant equipment in the same system' R was operable and available to perform the required safety function. As stated above, either closed system Integrity or one operable isolation device existed to prevent i leakage though each' penetration. Therefore, this reporting requirement also does not i apply to this event. l Due to this change in reportability, no supplemental report will be made as indicated on the LER submitted March 23,1989. Henceforth, similar events will be treated as not reportable. This change in reportability has been reviewed by the Station Nuclear l
| | Specifically,10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) states that any ev_ent or condition that alone |
| l l
| | ..could.have prevented the ful.fillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to control the release of radioactive materialis reportable. However,10 |
| S I' > h 9
| | :1 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) allows that-Individual' component failures need not be reported pursuant to paragraph 50.739i)(2)(v)(C) if redundant equipment in the same system' R |
| | was operable and available to perform the required safety function. As stated above, either closed system Integrity or one operable isolation device existed to prevent i |
| | leakage though each' penetration. Therefore, this reporting requirement also does not apply to this event. |
| | Due to this change in reportability, no supplemental report will be made as indicated on the LER submitted March 23,1989. Henceforth, similar events will be treated as not reportable. This change in reportability has been reviewed by the Station Nuclear S |
| | I' h |
| | 9 |
|
| |
|
| c . | | c Safety and Operating Committee and has been discussed with the NRC Senior Resident inspector at North Anna. |
| Safety and Operating Committee and has been discussed with the NRC Senior ; | | Very truly yours, Dk' W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear cc: |
| Resident inspector at North Anna. | | U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region ll - |
| Very truly yours, Dk' W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region ll - | |
| 101 Marietta Street, N.W. | | 101 Marietta Street, N.W. |
| Suite'2900 | | Suite'2900 Atlanta, Georgia - 30323 Mr. M. S. Lesser NRC Senior Resident inspector North Anna Power Station |
| , Atlanta, Georgia - 30323 Mr. M. S. Lesser
| |
| * NRC Senior Resident inspector !
| |
| North Anna Power Station | |
| , (.- | | , (.- |
| _'
| |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
| {{LER-Nav}} | | {{LER-Nav}} |
text
.
j VINGINIA EuiCTRIC AND POWER COMPANY Hicunoxo,VinatwiA cues:
November 14,1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Serial No.
90 697 Attention: Document Control Desk NAPS /RCS:rcs R2 Washington, DC 20555 Docket No.
50-339 License No.
NPF 7 Gentlemen:
ylRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT 2
~ CHANGE IN REPORTABILITY
~ On March 23,1989, Virginia Electric and Power Company submitted Licensee Event Report (LER) 89-003-00 for North Anna Unit 2. This LER documented ten containment.
Isolation-valves which exceeded the acceptable "as-found" leak rates for Type C testing. The LER treated the event as reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii) for an "... event or condition that resulted in the condition of the nuclear power plant, including its principal safety barriers, being seriously degraded...." However, upon further consideration, we have determined this event to be not reportable. In the case of each valve which exceeded the 0.6 La acceptance criterion, either closed system '
1 integrity or one operable isolation device existed which would have prevented direct leakage to the environment. Therefore, the penetrations remained operable and the containment isolation capability was not seriously degraded.
in addition, we have evaluated the event with respect to other relevant reporting criteria of 10- CFR-50.73 and have determined them also to be not applicable.
Specifically,10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C) states that any ev_ent or condition that alone
..could.have prevented the ful.fillment of the safety function of structures or systems that are needed to control the release of radioactive materialis reportable. However,10
- 1 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) allows that-Individual' component failures need not be reported pursuant to paragraph 50.739i)(2)(v)(C) if redundant equipment in the same system' R
was operable and available to perform the required safety function. As stated above, either closed system Integrity or one operable isolation device existed to prevent i
leakage though each' penetration. Therefore, this reporting requirement also does not apply to this event.
Due to this change in reportability, no supplemental report will be made as indicated on the LER submitted March 23,1989. Henceforth, similar events will be treated as not reportable. This change in reportability has been reviewed by the Station Nuclear S
I' h
9
c Safety and Operating Committee and has been discussed with the NRC Senior Resident inspector at North Anna.
Very truly yours, Dk' W. L. Stewart Senior Vice President - Nuclear cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region ll -
101 Marietta Street, N.W.
Suite'2900 Atlanta, Georgia - 30323 Mr. M. S. Lesser NRC Senior Resident inspector North Anna Power Station
, (.-
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000339/LER-1989-002-02, :on 890220,two Valves Which Isolate Flow from Discharge Header of Lhsi Pumps to Cold Legs of RCS Simultaneously Closed During Hydrostatic Tests.Caused by Need to Provide Overpressure Protection |
- on 890220,two Valves Which Isolate Flow from Discharge Header of Lhsi Pumps to Cold Legs of RCS Simultaneously Closed During Hydrostatic Tests.Caused by Need to Provide Overpressure Protection
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000339/LER-1989-003, Advises of Change in Reportability for LER 89-003-00 Re 10 Containment Isolation Valves W/Excessive Leak Rates | Advises of Change in Reportability for LER 89-003-00 Re 10 Containment Isolation Valves W/Excessive Leak Rates | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vi) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000339/LER-1989-004-02, :on 890502,unexpected Automatic Reactor Trip Signal Generated During Performance of ICP-FW-2-F-2486. Caused by Procedure Inadequacy.Instrument Dept Procedures Will Be Reviewed & Revised |
- on 890502,unexpected Automatic Reactor Trip Signal Generated During Performance of ICP-FW-2-F-2486. Caused by Procedure Inadequacy.Instrument Dept Procedures Will Be Reviewed & Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000338/LER-1989-004-01, :on 890405,determined That One Steam Generator Tube of Initial Sample Group Was Defective During 1989 Refueling Outage.Caused by Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking.Tubes Susceptible to Failure Plugged |
- on 890405,determined That One Steam Generator Tube of Initial Sample Group Was Defective During 1989 Refueling Outage.Caused by Primary Water Stress Corrosion Cracking.Tubes Susceptible to Failure Plugged
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function | | 05000339/LER-1989-005-02, :on 890314,main Steam Safety Valve (MSSV) Setpoints Out of Tolerance Allowed by Tech Spec 3.7.1.1. Cause Not Determined.Mssv Refurbished & Retested to Ensure Pressures within Allowable Limit |
- on 890314,main Steam Safety Valve (MSSV) Setpoints Out of Tolerance Allowed by Tech Spec 3.7.1.1. Cause Not Determined.Mssv Refurbished & Retested to Ensure Pressures within Allowable Limit
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000338/LER-1989-005-01, :on 890225,unit Tripped from 76% Power When Initiating Signal for Reactor Trip Was Greater than Feedwater Flow Mismatch Coincident W/Low Steam Generator Level.Caused by Closure of Regulating Valve |
- on 890225,unit Tripped from 76% Power When Initiating Signal for Reactor Trip Was Greater than Feedwater Flow Mismatch Coincident W/Low Steam Generator Level.Caused by Closure of Regulating Valve
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000339/LER-1989-005, :on 890314,main Steam Safety Valves Setpoints Out of Tolerance Per Tech Specs 3.7.1.1.Cause Undetermined. Valves Refurbished & Retested Until Setpoint within Allowable Tech Specs |
- on 890314,main Steam Safety Valves Setpoints Out of Tolerance Per Tech Specs 3.7.1.1.Cause Undetermined. Valves Refurbished & Retested Until Setpoint within Allowable Tech Specs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000339/LER-1989-006, :on 890315,pressurizer Code Safety Valves out- of-tolerance |
- on 890315,pressurizer Code Safety Valves out- of-tolerance
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000339/LER-1989-007-02, :on 890403,component Cooling Flow Lost to Both RHR Hxs,Causing Supply Valves to Close & Loss of RHR Cooling Capacity.Caused by Painter Brushing Against Supply Isolation Valve.Instrument Air Restored |
- on 890403,component Cooling Flow Lost to Both RHR Hxs,Causing Supply Valves to Close & Loss of RHR Cooling Capacity.Caused by Painter Brushing Against Supply Isolation Valve.Instrument Air Restored
| | | 05000338/LER-1989-007, :on 890328,combined as Found Leakage Exceeded Allowable Limit for Previous Operating Cycle.Caused by Misadjustment.Station Work Request Initiated to Inspect & Adjust Valves as Necessary |
- on 890328,combined as Found Leakage Exceeded Allowable Limit for Previous Operating Cycle.Caused by Misadjustment.Station Work Request Initiated to Inspect & Adjust Valves as Necessary
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000338/LER-1989-007-01, :on 890328,local Leak Rate Limit Exceeded. Initial Evaluation Attributed Cause of Type C Test Failures to Misadjustment.Work Request Initiated & Valve Leakage & Maintenance History Monitored |
- on 890328,local Leak Rate Limit Exceeded. Initial Evaluation Attributed Cause of Type C Test Failures to Misadjustment.Work Request Initiated & Valve Leakage & Maintenance History Monitored
| | | 05000338/LER-1989-008-01, :on 890414,determined That Less than Design Svc Water Sys Flow Available to Recirculational Spray Hxs.Caused by Inadequate Maint Procedures,Resulting in Missetting of Mechanical Stops.Stops & Limit Switches Reset |
- on 890414,determined That Less than Design Svc Water Sys Flow Available to Recirculational Spray Hxs.Caused by Inadequate Maint Procedures,Resulting in Missetting of Mechanical Stops.Stops & Limit Switches Reset
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000339/LER-1989-008-02, :on 890806,ESF Valve 2-RS-MOV-201B Inadvertently Closed During on-line Slave Relay Testing. Caused by Incorrect Interlock Identification for Valve.Valve Opened Following Testing of Slave Relay K645 |
- on 890806,ESF Valve 2-RS-MOV-201B Inadvertently Closed During on-line Slave Relay Testing. Caused by Incorrect Interlock Identification for Valve.Valve Opened Following Testing of Slave Relay K645
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000339/LER-1989-008-01, :on 890806,ESF Valve 2-RS-MOV-201B Closed Inadvertently During Initial Performance of 2-PT-36.5.3A. Caused by Misidentification of Interlock for 2-RS-MOV-201B. Tech Spec 3.0.3 Entered & Deviation Rept Done |
- on 890806,ESF Valve 2-RS-MOV-201B Closed Inadvertently During Initial Performance of 2-PT-36.5.3A. Caused by Misidentification of Interlock for 2-RS-MOV-201B. Tech Spec 3.0.3 Entered & Deviation Rept Done
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000338/LER-1989-008, :on 890414,determined That Water Flow to Recirculation Spray HXs Less than Design.Caused by Inadequate Maint Procedures Necessary to Achieve Throttled Valve Position.Valves Repositioned |
- on 890414,determined That Water Flow to Recirculation Spray HXs Less than Design.Caused by Inadequate Maint Procedures Necessary to Achieve Throttled Valve Position.Valves Repositioned
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000338/LER-1989-009-01, :on 890515,main Steam Line Code Safety Valves as Found Set Pressures Found to Be Outside Lift Set Pressure Tolerance.Cause of Event Not Determined.Valves Refurbished & Retested by Wyle Labs |
- on 890515,main Steam Line Code Safety Valves as Found Set Pressures Found to Be Outside Lift Set Pressure Tolerance.Cause of Event Not Determined.Valves Refurbished & Retested by Wyle Labs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000338/LER-1989-010-01, :on 890416,normal Power Supply to 4,160-volt Emergency Buses 1H & 2J Lost When Lifted Wire Inadvertently Grounded During Removal for Switchyard Mods.Caused by Personnel Error.Rhr Pump B Restored |
- on 890416,normal Power Supply to 4,160-volt Emergency Buses 1H & 2J Lost When Lifted Wire Inadvertently Grounded During Removal for Switchyard Mods.Caused by Personnel Error.Rhr Pump B Restored
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000338/LER-1989-011-01, :on 881123,discrepancy Identified Between Operation of Control Room Air Conditioning Sys & Operational Requirements of Tech Spec 3.7.7.1 & Design Basis.Caused by Misinterpretation of Tech Specs |
- on 881123,discrepancy Identified Between Operation of Control Room Air Conditioning Sys & Operational Requirements of Tech Spec 3.7.7.1 & Design Basis.Caused by Misinterpretation of Tech Specs
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000338/LER-1989-012-01, :on 890626,emergency Diesel Generator Inadvertently Started During Performance of Reactor Protection & ESF Response Time Testing.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled |
- on 890626,emergency Diesel Generator Inadvertently Started During Performance of Reactor Protection & ESF Response Time Testing.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Counseled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000338/LER-1989-013-01, :on 890626,incore Flux Mapping Frame Assemble Found Unrestrained.Caused by Inadequate Installation. Engineering Work Request & 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Written & Approved |
- on 890626,incore Flux Mapping Frame Assemble Found Unrestrained.Caused by Inadequate Installation. Engineering Work Request & 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Written & Approved
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000338/LER-1989-014-01, :on 890719,unit Experienced Automatic Reactor Trip from 90% Power Due to Loss of Electro Hydraulic Control Sys Pressure.Caused by Failed O-ring on Turbine Trip Solenoid Operated Valve.Evaluation Initiated |
- on 890719,unit Experienced Automatic Reactor Trip from 90% Power Due to Loss of Electro Hydraulic Control Sys Pressure.Caused by Failed O-ring on Turbine Trip Solenoid Operated Valve.Evaluation Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation | | 05000338/LER-1989-015-01, :on 890808,input Error in LBLOCA Analysis for 18% Steam Generator Tube Plugging Licensing Case Discovered. Caused by PCT Above Limit Specified in 10CFR50.46.Reanalysis Performed to Determine Impact |
- on 890808,input Error in LBLOCA Analysis for 18% Steam Generator Tube Plugging Licensing Case Discovered. Caused by PCT Above Limit Specified in 10CFR50.46.Reanalysis Performed to Determine Impact
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | | 05000338/LER-1989-016-01, :on 890826,recirculation Spray HX Svc Water a Supply Header Isolation Motor Operated Valves Deenergized in Closed Position.Caused by Miscommunication Between Shift Supervisor & Other Personnel.Power Reinstated |
- on 890826,recirculation Spray HX Svc Water a Supply Header Isolation Motor Operated Valves Deenergized in Closed Position.Caused by Miscommunication Between Shift Supervisor & Other Personnel.Power Reinstated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000338/LER-1989-017-02, :on 891205,reactor Trip Occurred Due to lo-lo Level in B Steam Generator Resulting from Electro Hydraulic Control Sys Pressure Transients.Caused by Leaking Turbine Overspeed Protection Circuitry Valves |
- on 891205,reactor Trip Occurred Due to lo-lo Level in B Steam Generator Resulting from Electro Hydraulic Control Sys Pressure Transients.Caused by Leaking Turbine Overspeed Protection Circuitry Valves
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000338/LER-1989-018-01, :on 891219,determined That Three Pressurizer Pressure Safety Injection Instrumentation Channels May Not Have Adequate Margin Between Actuation Setpoint & Bottom of Instrument Span |
- on 891219,determined That Three Pressurizer Pressure Safety Injection Instrumentation Channels May Not Have Adequate Margin Between Actuation Setpoint & Bottom of Instrument Span
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000338/LER-1989-019-02, :on 891228,discovered That Outer Door of Containment Equipment Escape Air Lock Was Drawing in Air & Inner Door Noted as Not Being in Fully Closed Position.Cause Undetermined.Sys Enhancements Being Evaluated |
- on 891228,discovered That Outer Door of Containment Equipment Escape Air Lock Was Drawing in Air & Inner Door Noted as Not Being in Fully Closed Position.Cause Undetermined.Sys Enhancements Being Evaluated
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(1) | | 05000338/LER-1989-066, :on 890323,1H Emergency Bus Inadvertently Deenergized for Approx 10 S.Caused by Personnel Error. Appropriate Emergency Diesel Generator Periodic Tests Will Be Revised to Prevent Testing at Abnormal Time |
- on 890323,1H Emergency Bus Inadvertently Deenergized for Approx 10 S.Caused by Personnel Error. Appropriate Emergency Diesel Generator Periodic Tests Will Be Revised to Prevent Testing at Abnormal Time
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation |
|