ML19320C561

Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents Directed to Nrc.Requests Factual Basis of Anticipated Testimony Re Natural Gas Use as Fuel & Subsequent Costs of Electricity.W/Certification of Svc.Related Correspondence

ML19320C561
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	07/09/1980
From:	Jeffrey Scott TEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
References
NUDOCS 8007170374
Download: ML19320C561 (4)

Text

, .

(). i, ,

'" . nrinr.n omnumimscr U:.m D e- . m C.7 m 72.,,, O qw I,, .

UUCLEAR REGULATCRY CC:CISSIC:! p EETcRE T"E ATr"IC E AFE T A:iD LTCE'FTim MRO '

In the Matter of x 2 p $g 7

9" p v

H L and P X tocket No. 50-466 & r d p

( Allens Creek) X -

4 pfyg T::TERROGATORTES A"D TROEUCTICU OF TCUTC TS TR j C-4 g/

Pursuant to Section 2.7046 and 2.741 of the :IRC Rules, Tex b/ #

asks the following Interrogatories and requests for documents to be answered according to the instructions and definations that the A;plicant , H L and P set forth in its First set of Interrogatcries to Tex PIRG. TNTERPOGATcRIES

1. S (Natural Gas alternative) 1 Provide the factual basis and a su==ary of the testi=cny each v.itness is expoeted to provide to the following issues er questions. (a)?ihat are the reasons that natural gas can not be used as a fuel to replace the need for 1C:!GS? (b) Tihat sections of what laws prevent the use of natural ga for utility fuel after 1990?

(c) :s natural gas an e:rtironment:11y safsr fuel than nuclea.r power?

(d) Will the expected supply of nn:t: al gas be sufficient to su;;1y the A;;11 cant with enough energy to replace AC::GS?(e) Ecr do the future prices cf natural gas com;are to that of nuclear and coal?

(f) Have any new laws either been passed or prc;osed in the U.S.

Ccngress that would amend the Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1976 to allow utilities to centinue to burn natural gas past 1990?sCo the present laves alice utilities in the Ucn-attain:ent areas f r c:ddants and

• • a sulfur dionide to be exe ;ted frc= the required conversions away use of natural cas? (h) Ecw do the present and future costs of electri:ity ccmpare vihen generated by natural gas versus nuclear?

"!. Identify cny studies er d:cunents which the: that a new natural gr.s plantrill not produce electricity cere econo:ically than a nuclear plant?

, #12 (Conservation and intercennect) 1 "ihat conclusions reached by Taylor in his teck, Enerc" the Earv F a t,h,, do you disagree v.ith?

2. Vihat steps have you tar.en to pr =ote censervation within the last 1C years, cnd what ef fect have they had to date?

3. If the A;;11 cant underteck a =ajor effort (stending at least 2 billion dellers within ner: 1C years)to ;r::ct'e the c:nserv.

ati n of energy of its customers, what % of the energy nov. : acted could be saved?

4. If you doubt that uore than 303 of energy ceuld be ::nserved then give tha basis of your conclusi:n. Please cite all studies Or reports that ycu rely en for this conclusien.

5. How much mere generating capacity than necesscry te sur ly peak demand do each of the utilities within 500 =ilas of Ecusts.,

Texas have at the present time? ( Ancrier at least as to these utilities taking part in the ngowing " Federal Interconnecto ;r:-

ceedings.)

6. 7. hat effect on necessary reserve =crgins(now about 153),

v:111 the pr: posed "LC Intercennect" proposed by H L?<F and CS?! have en the Atrlicant?

7. Iflat studies er reports do y0u have to indicate that the ie:and for e) - tricity within the Applicants service area till not ce less ths.: . st projected in the ER and FTS teccuse cf Harris County and Galvecton County being de:ignato as "non-attain =ent" oreas by .~;A and thus restricting the growth cf pollution causing (and electricity u:ing) industries. Su==arice ycur positi:n en this i::ue.

5. Identify cnd turnarine tne re ults of any studies ":hich show that it reuld not be ecencaically feasible for A;;11 cant to reduce ts reserve =crcin through " inter:ennection of Grid:".

1 THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS Od POOR QUAllTY PAGES 6#/

80 0 717 0 3M

-* , -. -.-. ~ .a e- ..--. . . _ . , . _.

r -

1. 26 (error in ec=puter pregram)

1. Chat assurance do you have that the ce=; uter prcgra=(s) used b.- the Applicant to calculate forces and stresses on the reactor, associated piping, and centain=ent do not have errers involving the s"bstraction of forces that cheuld be added?

1. 31 (Technical Qualifications)

1. Sp _n w h at ways th e quality assurance ;regrar of the Applicant es. AC"35 differs frc: that proposed by the applicant for the South Texas project.

2. Io you =aintain that Ibascc would carry out a better quality assurance program than Brown and Root? thy or why not.

3. Do you deny that the A;;11 cant underestimated the a=0unt of constructicn =aterials to be used in the S. Texas project in the a: cunts specified in (b) of the contention? Why?

4. Is the design or the ACNGS plant further alcng than the S. Texas plants were at t.he ti=e of their Construction permit hearings? What percent cc plete were the design plans of S. Te!

at the time of its CP hearings, and wnat is cc ;1ete are the des plans of ACUGS at the presene time?

5. Chat arounts of steel, cencrete, rebar, piping,:1re and cable, terminations, cable trays, aad conduit are new expected to be used in ACUGS? What is the total projected cost of each of these items such as concrete?

6. How many of the a;;11: ants direct e ;1cyees have a ph. O.

degree in either a science or engineering field? For each give their name, ;0sition with a;;1icant, years ex;erience since receiving ph. O., zu==ary of present duties, university degree (ph0) received frc , and undergraduate grade ;cint average. Chich have degrees in nuclear physics er nuclear engineering?

7. c ycu feel that the naC was justified in fining the a;;11: ant 31C0,000 dollars so far in 1950 for violations cf the URC regulatiens? Why cr why net?

3. List the violatiens charged againct the a;;11 cant that resulted in the 1COK fine ever proble=s at the S. Texas project.

9. ilhat effect in the way of increased cost of constructicn at the S. Texas plant has the qualit'/ assurance ;regra there had?

Chac G increase has that been?

10. What % ci the increased ccst of the S. Texas pr0jec c, do you think was caused by a) interveners, b) increased costs of URC regulation changes, c) riscalculatien of criginal esti=ates ,

d) technical inec=;etance o f a;;11 cant, and other causes? Please detail the 'casis of each part cf the answer. For exa ;1e in b), list each of the regulation changes, the date of change, and increased ecst to S. Texas frc= such change, 11 What specific changes has the aptlicant =ade to increase its technical ec:petence as a result cf a) Three ! Ele Island lessons learned, b) new SRC regulations, c) NEC re;crt and fine cencerning qu-lity centrol at S. Texas?

12 What 5 cf total cost of S. Texas and AC"GS has and is expected to result from a) technical costs such as design and technical emploveec,b) cost of =aterials such as concrete and steel, c) interest, and d) overhead such as attorneys and beckkeepers, and office s; ace.

1. 21 (radiation er;csure of workers) 1 How =any employees are planned to be en each crew (shif t) for the c;eratien of ACMGS? How =any ran.re=s of ex;csure are expec'ed each vear . of operatien(ist thrcush LCth)*. lP4ch .tas**.d- . . . .v. .,

cuch ac c;erater er electrical re rir, etc. are expected co average the hist 30' ex;csure/ year? "0 cucn?

2. i.h.t has been the total cecu;ctional ex;ccure frc: each

,, .w. -

r,_ .-,* '- '

.. w... . . . . . ^y . .

,........<.A.'.e"..ea'.'.-...-".*d..g- . .w.e '..--.

. 16 - a. g r - *. . . ~

f. eA... A. .G b..h...4g. 9 8.6,.

g

• M .Q wA A..;- M. #.4.M..

% Q b

.~?.. b. h. 4

. M. ..M.MQ E W

... ,w. . smM

.. . . . fm -.. . .S .. $

e 4.

q

1 i

~

3. Uhat changes have been r.9de in AC"GS as ccupared to older EUR's that would reduce the expected occu.cational ex;osure of AC"GS7 Octail expected reductions to be expecte i fr:m each change whether design (thicker concrete) or operationali new rules).

4. Detail any reasons that you believe that it is nat "rnsonably achievable" for Allens Creek to keep its total occupational exposure equal to or leso than that of the average ex;osure c# the exposure experienced by the E!R in 2 above that has kept its ex;csure 'he lowest.

5. "That has the mean ., median , and range of exposures to workers been at the plants :isted in 2 above i.e. that to individual workers such as in 1977, 3rotas Ferry mean ra,s c.S9 re=, median was 1.0 rem, r.in was 0.07 rem and ax cas 15.9 re:.

6. For each of the p1 ants in 2 above, and for each of the years cince v.n w. , .w . 1970, ua +. 0 ,..show al,,.e. thea nu=ber -of - rcrker,s that received = ore radiation

. .6 .w.. b,.

s *w.ue u.w -

6 .6 '. u +. 4*0 . o.

~2p r C nv a, +u ,. 1 - -4 ~

.y . g w 1 ..+u..a.4 1 .w ...e .ajw a,fo- *nu- +w. m e.c-.we , ..o, seo.S.,-) . la...u.. a

- w . . ... . .ww. s. n.a design dif fers frc= that of TM1, Ixplain why these differences make it easier for the operators to control the plant under all accident 5 ceniitions.

<. ..h. a.. . 4. s +.h e . aa..4 .,. . c 4. s.ar.,. e e 6.. ..e .e,.. .4 .. ....1.en w

.eog. . *O sw e . e a. a

. *. oe s. v.. a +. ..4e.. -w s.

a b.] e.n.e w oy.e a.u .+n o. ~..w.. a. s. w e +...co.

4. w 4 e

. . . . 1.. -....o w.4

~.. " e ". 0 a."e '.aI eV . a a e .# 47 '..b.e Cw n'.."c .' ."w*w * *.

. .g"'

a t ws

s. "6. a . a e *.w.. . .., a a . ...-...w.. . e O .e a)'.4...

-u+ b s .s

..ama ., n . ..a. 3 ) .s' 4 -oa. c1...s - %

s.u a s. w e a.+ ....4 ..a .e .a u. s..w. e o..-,. e s.4 _n a. (' ..cs. on. .. a.

. . s. Ews -41.0 +4.e, e .449.- 6...-D e. .

w..+ 6 ..m

.4 , +he a.1 . -+

w.. a . ,.a.9 o.. ...w.a

• e C +. .w. a.eu. - 1m. ..o .-u e a , .*.4../ ,. ) .

. ' .. .% ..4ne o s.w- g .w g.. agv.a(ge. . .e A.4. + 4.cu g .1-..gA.

m - n . ~~ ~

av . ..w-.. .en. a. n w . c.c ,

w

. . . ~ ...a".j" u ' e '.".w* u'.. d b. e al.i. ' 7. *. #. ..4 ". '.'".a. C".".'."^' ."a** .S.,o" d. ".. .h a '.

.4 .ac .\e4

. w ... .. ,

... .aC . Oy".ee^o p". 4h 2. yco.4+4.

, ~

g w, b n.w. , . .w.. y .j o .4 a.1)'y an.

- a ,, A 1,.4. . .

, = . D ,. +. % ' -4 +w. .. e .ee a. . , . . . eoser .

C-...1 i 4 e r. .

. y. -.

a. .k. a. nC +.a a~ o...

-o, ww /. e 4 .. +w. . . a *.

J.e. a. r. m.. n ., o.4 b.., a. .a .m.e g ,u..n

. s.o .n.dg. e L,. a.. -....

s. u. a- ...

. s.. . . o. 1. &a.%. a..

,. a n. . .4 .p .a. r * ...- w .

.a yy eo 0 ~ Jc.a. - A- aC -n.aw .ae.ms. ~..s ~ s e s. .w. r.e . ...a w o-4

,. .m. e s. .e . .

n a:, ;. ( .a.6 i a

. ,. .. a.. e ..n C .u.a.- n. .a n , )

I . A.,.

+u g..r. 6 7 a ,v s ..wn g., .4 *w w..e u .e.. c .r .a.e .. . s....yo.

of . u 4 .. ". * ." a. .* .* e C.n a.

Aa ..o...

C .e .ae av< ~s..e ~

oc o.

p r.. 1 a4, ,.w . ,

g . +w .. e '1 e. *. L..

4 u . y.w

. . . . o. w 4. 4 wo wg +w ...e c y.4..1...*w ..w..-n..4 2e........,........e

. . . . . . .w ea.ee Cr

. . a x.w 4 , a C .... .4 .c. 4.Ce4.e w...

4.*,

a .w

s. w. 6 e ...4 .. .. e. .* 4.a

a. .a. . . Case O.r ., .r_4 3 4.. .. e.ne C.w.a.. .. .,a.1 b m. a .e . .

t

~waoa*. 4_ s .s. k. e 4 3 .. 4 6. 4. .. .

+. e. y e a- *... .. , e., .c ...%.-- w- -

.wa .o. "..%..a-. 4-o .oe +w

....,s.

. +c...e........

,e +w w- r4,1a.

....% O.e y a*.4 S + ..y e u A....a.

- .. w. .ue ...% - ".s...e... o .y . - . . . .

C, . .b. ..Ay .. e r. 5. e .4 .au46. . . - +w - .. e *. sy o . . r. .e awC.a..*4 --

. e .. . u.w ac.

• w.

C a. . , o w, . :, 0 maA.. . .

4....~ .. e.., . 3 . ,9... e o- 4n w...e .o..s w-Ce.1.o.

s. .s. .. a 6 ....e w e ,. a--... 44e.... * .. , . . ..l a. *w . .. a *. b e o.

,-. 4u.e s.u.e a,C a w..w.. . . 4 w;en n cee..en,w.

sa a

+. "%..4 a. b m. '..h.a. " .".". .* .' e %s " y" .- ' u.". '. o" ."..a'.'. .#."..*y"e.*.*.*..dw'.". .. **

.#. a. .~ d ~ .4.w~ . " ** .. .

3..

' ' .? e *. 3 '. s. "

• y* .* Jv . .#.*.* *.ob e C.".ar C

• a.7 b a. d..* *.

, = , L4 o.u t h e s +.,a, 4 4 e - . 4 e7- . +. + w.oa6 w... a.l .. .e 4.2 . ..o

%. e - a. s. *4

.o. 4 e e. .. , e .

a2.p (w"n,+.,1. .. . a A

.'O '. a.d i. 'n** n'u.va "M ~ w".'u"'.."^.'

rs m.u ..v 4.,e s.-r.e.)

fo I.

,9 w .7 '. .b. e

.d .*.d ". a. ~'/o*'*.* d. .*

o. .# d. .# .# e." 0.". '.

.#.-..a - a.1 e. u .ba O+w ue ,

• f

.'..M e o 6.%u wa6 e - .. g. t *.s w i.e a. n A.e e.4 *,

ww .w.

w....a.

g n ..,.. s0 .. 9 Cs1. +h ,w w 4.. .e..e . + e.s %w E w.m.. o e O .e s..w. e ca. . 4 .,J , . O f w..e y.l , . h-e..

-; v *.e a +.O O ,y e..a. . e .y.ay .. a. es.1.. .g .

3. .X. y 1.. a. 4

. .s. . .w.- , ,w- a..

. k.m . ,

a .e .e. .. . e *. w au- +. u.u. w . r1, ... a +. ..s. 6 - w . ow w .. .4.,.

.. . e +w

. .. e

.e . . - . d4 ea..k.a m. e ~ a. 7. .a. a. '. a..'n s . .d.1 .' .e.' .-+ a . 4.- a.l .i e~, - a. o .

1. 39 (reactor n ves:el)

.. -%.. a *. .4 e ).,,,.

. . . . o . n 4 e s. an.. 3.

e v .r .w.

. . . . .u.. r ..wo 4 e m,.a .. . ...a.ua. ., .e Tack A-117

2. 'lihy were FCR's allowed to use less safe reactCr ves;e1

=aterials *han 2;R's? Explain.

,z . *%.. a *w .o

.. 4 - A he ba.e.4 o- .r.-. . ..ok e e,. w n r. e. ..

. . . e.vy.. e. o o e 44 ... . .a oe. no .e. w . . e.

4

. +w

.. u a6. 4. o" *..h e ". e a .e".."a. CA# ." a. a C ' v* ." .#."a *w'. ". ." O w" "w#*6. *-* .o

• m . , 4 .a y .. 4-fo n-,...e

...a e 4,Cw.

w 4 ,

w 46

.. n .ea.

.~ . . . gd. ..a. . s. .h. c. -,71. g e ..y. 9.es u 4.. 4

.. .e ...._

g x

,..g, .. e ., .,,. a c . .0 ...e.+..w.

.c 3 % . .. . . .. . .. n. .a.. e . .... . o~ .e. .<.a .. -3 *, , w. . , .

a ,.

a .. e 4.a., . .w,,..t.. w' A. ,. . 6 a. .. .. ... .. wn .r .. e . w *w

, e .a , w) s. .u. ,.

.. 7 . - .+c. ...4 ., ., ' o ') .n 2 + L e ,.,*% .

, u. . ,* 4. ... e u. 3. .e. . . ... 3 .r '. .b. e .".. a '. e ." ^.#a' , ". ) . . . #

'. .t'. a "..3'.c.".u'.'.,

. ...z.. ..

a. ') s.uu e ..;.u. a. . e n. .r u w. e. ..a-s. e. 4.3.', , . 4 .r ,) .4 s. .e * .g

'* e +.'. ".v..44 *. ws*n".., e wn".~, .r C ....g ,s. ,

..a.

. . . .. ,u . .

n . . g ,. a. , , e. A . a. .n.. e. . ,

wa g r. a. . ., .. . q1 . 4 5 , .- r. . ..e ...e. .. a w .

n e

_r o.n u e . . .u.c... 4 a....

..S.. s S. 4 . .-. . .:. ,. u.. .- - ... a. ow. v e r. *w . . . e. .r .. ... . s P . . e. ... e. . . - a. c. ... ,.

.. . . ... n.. 5.,.

. .., .o.,.4.. a. .-a . . . y a. 3 0. . , 4.s ..-  :. , . u. a... . .. .. .. ., .. .~..u.

. .. . ..; . a.m. ... ...u.

_ .... , , . ....r....,... . . . . . r., -- . . ...- . . ,

.. . c... ...e...

.e. ... ...,.u.p, l . .. g.M.... g 4 g ... .. aO ..$. . . . . * ..Mf./.W...- . -

. . . ..: a.. . . . *.

F-

. . . < . . . . .- O. . . .P.-

. . . u .,.-..-.46...  ;

m..e wg

. * * - + '

..w.=~ .. . . . . .m...; -...a.,.-

,..M 4

F -

.. .p.. . .

-. .... ~ .e s . ... ..e..-.*.

+ . . . . . .

,a

s -

i l

9 l

l 1

l i

1 d41 (over-pressure in vessel) 1 Chat is the ASME Eciler and Pressure Vessel Code upper pressure limit for the ACNGS reactor vessel? shat values are the applicants relief valves set at for the reac:cr vessel?

2 that basis is used to justify that the closure of the =ain valve isolation stea system fcrvalves the reactor? is the =ost severe test of the relief

3. Specify thy it roulc be inrossible to have a ce==on = ode failure of the relief valves such that less than half roulc operate in the relief mode at the pressure-relief set point, syste:

k. That is the time delay of the AC"GS pressure sensing

? Valve Asse=bly? What is the accuracy of thece ti=es?

Vihat is the range of times associatec with the slowest to fastest valves? slowest to fastest sensing syste=?

3. In tne pressure analysis perfer=ad by a proble=, what was the shape of the press.re v.ti=e pplicant curveoffrc= this beginning through the end of the transit in pressure ? Chat is the rate of change of pressure with ti=e near the 1300 p:i level of the transit "nder the conditions assu=ed? that eculd the resulting pressure be if it is assumed that all relief valves were delayed by a) 0.1 see and b) 1.0 second in opening past the times assumed in the analysic?

6. as..a+. wnaa e .aoes a,y.,.,4c .. +. ..,..,.

g ., .. .e c., a.4 a

. .e. s...4 .<:- +... > e4.

that the safety /reli,ef v,alve c;ening set points are assu=ed at a e e.va. 4 .e.3 .. h y n. 4 C., . .

a ... s . e..e.o.

.r. ~.ma a'. d. .e i .. * " e k.a.ei s .#.+ .* al.' o .'. e- +..b e ' C"".a" c . a.....~. e.e"..- = . .

capacity to be greater then the reactor coolart pressure bouncary design ;ressure? Chere is the large safety factor here?

3 .s. . +. . e a, .. ,. .. w

1. LO and .w

. .. .ays .a.a 33 (".ydrogen c---

explosi:n)

,, .. . ... e ov.. e a .s u... a..., s e. e a e- 2

. . .e . +. 4 , ...

. a .a. e ~ s a4 - .o .r... . .r . . s..u.n . e c .< m..i.., n. ( n o u..s. .an . . .. . .a.4

. ... _. , , s %.a. ..

,,a o ,e,. ) ,

2. 20 you beli e.s. ._,.,c4. n ., .. +-t.e , ,. eve that it rould,be

n. e 4.. . u.. e ..e e . v- i=;cssible fer a hydr: gen

, . . r. c .e nn o~.w

. .xs.. .. .s..a.._o4 - *w...e <.4 e..

.. .e ,. , .,., e 4 ., e ., . .- . u. ..4.

. m . n. .. u..;,, e.

+w

... . .. . . .. e c . .e . . . . . . ..s... . .w .4 . . .. e a)

Expl,,ainvessel?and  :: hat b)grecsurec:ntain=ent would that it takeit W to uldalso take cause to :ause the concrete a crack?

a .w. e.. r.., w.u.a+. +

.e o.

.. un +. 4. - *w 4.... a.

. r. . a .o. .w.e. 4

... e . .. e .e .r A.we ,. . .e e m-. . . . ee+.ec..

<, ~, c .... . , -.. . en. ..,, ,.

e;.+.e~s .e.. e.a

..a ....e? .. .e.o.e.3e.

e .w& . 3.

. e.4..,

. That do n ( ,..m..c - -,70u . . e think.s..a

. .) a,th.e was s ....ar.o.e su.lts o f the hy'rogen gas h a >. ...s .u.e .~~ ..m . esa... e measured cra 4. y.... ce.o during e 5.e ..

that ..

.4,.

transit? .s.c o.

Ihat.was.the 4., .,

a..e ,

cencentrati:n c'f hydresen

.. . s.s. . .

6 ..

a c a .".. ".' '.*. c .. ne .* .- . e ".. .' . a ."..v '. o s- a. n e x-.v'. - e..d e. ."., . .e".

.rm.C. . . w, .n a s. s..u.e ,.,ee s e.,

. .. ..c . 4 .....+ %. .. .' .' .#.d..* * .e ". '.

a. ..- nc. 0 + .. 1 a

.. ~,..e. a .. .w...a&. .w ..e o,e a.4.- .. e c..e.... .. se .4.a. . .

.w .. e . .- . e

.o..,..- . ,,u.., ..C.... $.. ,d leave fast? . . .

n

a. . ,=v (a .c.w .g) 1 Do you deny couee . e ,w.. e.. ,. .. .e . o . n. .- +. w .w...e-n o. N. ..o tha,t ,the radiat10n frc= a nuclear plant can

.2 as.ee .w-t n,a...w4..n causep an electronic =alfunction?

. . .. a .

.....u. c.na

.. .r...v.. 4. d e s"c"o." Da s.# .* , '..# ~u.". V, , .#c ." * .*v'"#..". g ' .". *. '. ^. .e # '. # ^ n '. ." a '.

e ..

s. n e a .4 . . . .aw.in aa S Co-... .* a r.u 4 ...

44+.

a. 4 . r. 3.c

. . . . . n.aw a 4.o

. a s.n L..C

. .crh,,. a. s... .,.. ... . , . 4.*4

. ..; 1.. ..*,ease,1 4.+o As.

.. .r . . . . .

4* .u. e , , s.3 D .. .y

v. E,. 4 .e

.w. .. a &.

a-44 a ..a ,n .as e~4 s.r.e A. . . . n.

4. s.o s..u.e a.4 .

oc3 (.4 a4e-..+e

. go . e ..)

m 1 Chat basis do you have for 'celieving tnat the rarid de;ress-urication of the ACUGS reacter vessel resulting fr = a c =71ete steam line break eculd not lead to a reactivity increasa too rapid to be over===e by the scran cycte=? Elhat stucies er re;crts do you rely en for this basic? ,PT,e,.e.,,,,, a ;. . 4 ..s eu.

-. , w 4

.ea 9

.$1% WYH ). J <h Ma=es !. rga*. c;ott, Jr. ,

e-L ;sm..,un.- . . - ,. n m - c; e q.7 7,m ... .

- . e.d .i *

-b a.e...e . . .c . -.. 3..- .3,

a. ,b. ..e gc. .

g.h.e-

. ..c.. e, .. ..#u. 4 .ae.r r.

. . . .. .e 4. ga v.+64 '[. .a- . a r .-. .... m. e ., e.g aas . .m.a . a vnow . . . .

t.n.,#.,.

6.W, .

v* .;,.Q,,.*C^

t.

3 er c

.a . ,%. .o -,

e;vd %y .#.4 e. .6.c s 4- ~~.d7

. e p

,* t' h by% sh 6 We.-..p- . .t..--.

- . ..,..g ",i$

.