ML17301A145: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATOR INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (RIDS)ACCESS/ON NBR: 85P 2010511.DOC~DATE', 85/01(25 NO'f ARI'ZEP!YES, FACIL,50 389 St.'ucie P)anti,Unit "2'<Flor ada Power 8 Liaht>>Co.AUTH',NAME" AU/HOB AFFILIATION WILLIAMS'~
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATOR         INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION                     TEM   (RIDS)
J~H.F l or ada'Power.-
ACCESS/ON NBR: 85P 2010511             . DOC ~ DATE',     85/01(25         NO'f ARI'ZEP! YES,                     DOCKEl." P FACIL,50 389       St.'ucie         P)anti,Unit     "2'<   Flor ada     Power 8 Liaht>> Co.                     05000389 AUTH',NAME"             AU/HOB AFFILIATION WILLIAMS'~J ~ H.         F l or ada'Power. 8 Light Co,
8 Light Co,'RECIP~NAME<RECIPIENT'PFILIATION EISENHUT'<
  'RECIP ~ NAME< RECIPIENT'PFILIATION EISENHUT'< Di G.         Division- of - Licensing 4 V + V   ~ M   ~     ~   '         ~ . r,           >>
Di G.Division-of-Licensing DOCKEl." P 05000389 4 V+V h~M~~'~~.r,>>SUBJECT!'pp) ication*for amend to.,License'PF16ieequestigg,that, r efer,encqd,))cense~conditions, complete/;.to satisfaction.
SUBJECT!'pp) ication* for amend to.,License'PF16ieequestigg,that, h                    ~
of NRC be<deleted in future license~amend,Fee paid.DISTR/BUTION CODE;$001DCOPIES'gECEIPED:
r efer,encqd, ) )cense~ conditions, complete/;.to satisfaction. of NRC be< deleted in future license~ amend,Fee                         paid.
L'TR ENCI'IZE'!'~''Ml,'ITLE OR Submittal!
DISTR/BUTION CODE;           $ 001D  COPIES 'gECEIPED: L'TR                 ENCI     'IZE'!     '~
General Distr ibution NOTES!'L:04i06/e3 05000389., RECIPIENT ID" COD//NAPE NRR>>ORB3 BC 01>>INTERNAL: ACRS'09 ELD/HDS2.NRR/DL'IR NRR/DL/QSRG NR R/D S I'/R A 8 RGN2 COPIES LTTR ENCL 7 7 6 6 0 1=1 1 1 1 1 RE C IP IEN7".ID CODE/NAME" ADM/LFMB.NRP/DE/MTEB NRR/DL/ORAB NR'~'TB G FILE>>04 ,',COPIES ENCL'1: ,1 0 f,i 1 1>>EXTERNAL!LPDR NSIC 03>>05 NRC" PDR'2 TOTAL NUMBER~OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 26 ENCL'23 h 1 rh wg T T'qh"hh""'if fq II r qif)I T cry f T'lf,+4J C',iii*4" q)f 1~4,T f if 4 IJI l P f'4 f f3 g I3l3 1~gri'+q)rqe4I)41'f'i'i'(II f'f ff)4'l.f I)ir I if<II rhq f4 ff ffqq 1 44 f)ll f)I po q'3 f I'g,rf'q)" T'~fr,'ll~Ili,rh 4~>'I ii ih~.f4 Iq Tl C4 q ff p qfn 1' P BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 FLORIDA POWER&LIGHT COMPANY January 25, 198/15 L-85-41 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention:
Submittal! General Distr ibution
Mr.Darrell G.Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555
                                                                                                        ''Ml,'ITLE OR 05000389 NOTES!'L:04i06/e3
              ., RECIPIENT               COPIES                    RE C IP IEN7" .        ,',COPIES ID" COD//NAPE             LTTR ENCL                ID CODE/NAME"                  ENCL' NRR>> ORB3       BC 01>>           7      7 INTERNAL: ACRS'                   09         6      6          ADM/LFMB.
ELD/HDS2.                               0          NRP/DE/MTEB                          1:
NRR/DL'IR NRR/DL/QSRG NR R/D S I'/R A 8 1=
1 1
NR G
                                                                      '~ 'TB NRR/DL/ORAB FILE>>         04
                                                                                              ,1 1
0 f,i 1>>
1      1 RGN2                            1 EXTERNAL! LPDR NSIC 03>>
05 NRC"   PDR'2 TOTAL NUMBER~ OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR                         26     ENCL     '23


==Dear Mr.Eisenhut:==
h 1 rh                                                                            fq      II
Re: St.Lucie Unit No.2 Docket No.50-389, NFP-I 6 License Conditions Florida Power and Light Company Letter L-84-333, dated November 20, l984, provided a status of the St.Lucie Unit 2 License Conditions and requested that those conditions that have been completed to the satisfaction of NRC be deleted in a future license amendment.
                                                                                                                                    )I r  qif wg T T 'qh "hh""'if                                                              T cry                                    1 ~4,T  f        'f  '      i    'i    '(II f 'lf,+4J T        C  ',iii*4" q) f              if 4  IJI  l  P      f 'f ff ) 4'l        .f  I)ir  I  if<  II f'4 f f3 g I3l3      1 ~ gri'  +q)  rqe4I)41                rhq  f4  ff    ffqq      1  44  f)ll f )I po  q
The purpose of this letter is to request a license amendment which would accomplish our earlier request.Therefore, in accordance with IO CFR 50.90, submitted herewith are three signed originals and forty copies of a request to amend Operating License NPF-I 6.The requested changes are indicated on the accompanying pages of the Operating License.In accordance with 10 CFR 50.9I and 50.92, Florida Power 8 Light Company has determined that this amendment does not involve any significant hazards considerations nor unreviewed safety question because deletion of license conditions which have been completed to NRC satisfaction is strictly administrative in nature.In accordance with IO CFR I70.2 I, attached is a check for the$150.00 application fee.In accordance with IO CFR 50.92(b)(l), a copy of the proposed amendment is being forwarded to the State Designee for the State of Florida.85020105i i 850i 25 PDR ADOCK 05000aa9 PDR ylgO'~0 PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE 1 I t Page 2 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr.Darrell G.Eisenhut, Director This change has been reviewed by the St.Lucie Plant Facility Review Group and the Florida Power and Light Company Nuclear Review Board.Very truly yours, Group Vice&sident Nuclear Energy JWW/R JS/cab A t tachment cc: J.P.O'Reilly, Director, Region II Harold F.Reis, Esquire Lyle Jerrett, Ph.D, Director No Si ificant Hazards Considerations Determination Florida Power Bc Light Company has completed all but two (2.C.I2 and 2.C.I9)of the St.Lucie Unit 2 License Conditions.
                                                  '3 f I'g,rf      '      q)"  T          '~    fr,'ll    ~  I ii ih Ili,rh    4  ~
The NRC has reviewed FPL s implementation of the completed license conditions and has found the implementation satisfactory.
                                                                                                    >
By letter dated November 20, 1984 (L-84-333), FPL requested that NRC delete those license conditions that had been completed.
                                                                                                        '                    ~
This proposed license amendment would accomplish that November 20, l984 request.Florida Power&Light Company has determined that the proposed license amendment is strictly administrative in nature.The amendment does not change any technical specifications and is requested only to"clean-up" the operating license and clarify those outstanding license conditions.
                                                                                                                                . f4 Iq Tl C4          ff q
Therefore, it has been determined that no significant hazards consideration are involved.  
p    qfn    1 '
~~}}
 
P  BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY January 25, 198/15 L-85-41 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555
 
==Dear Mr. Eisenhut:==
 
Re:   St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-389, NFP-I 6 License Conditions Florida Power and Light Company Letter L-84-333, dated November 20, l984, provided a status of the St. Lucie Unit 2 License Conditions and requested that those conditions that have been completed to the satisfaction of NRC be deleted in a future license amendment.
The purpose of this letter is to request a license amendment which would accomplish our earlier request. Therefore, in accordance with IO CFR 50.90, submitted herewith are three signed originals and forty copies of a request to amend Operating License NPF- I 6.
The requested changes are indicated on the accompanying pages of the Operating License.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.9I and 50.92, Florida Power 8 Light Company has determined that this amendment does not involve any significant hazards considerations nor unreviewed safety question because deletion of license conditions which have been completed to NRC satisfaction is strictly administrative in nature.
In accordance with IO CFR I70.2 I, attached is a check for the $ 150.00 application fee.
In accordance   with IO CFR 50.92(b)(l), a copy of the proposed amendment is being forwarded to the State Designee for the State of Florida.
85020105i PDR ADOCK i 850i 25 05000aa9                                                         ylgO'~0 PDR PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
 
1 I
t
 
Page 2 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director This change has been reviewed by the St. Lucie Plant Facility Review Group and the Florida Power and Light Company Nuclear Review Board.
Very truly yours, Group   Vice& sident Nuclear Energy JWW/R JS/cab A t tachment cc:   J. P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire Lyle Jerrett, Ph.D, Director
 
No Si ificant Hazards Considerations Determination Florida Power Bc Light Company has completed all but two (2.C.I2 and 2.C.I9) of the St. Lucie Unit 2 License Conditions.         The NRC has reviewed FPL s implementation of the completed license conditions and has found the implementation satisfactory. By letter dated November 20, 1984 (L-84-333), FPL requested that NRC delete those license conditions that had been completed. This proposed license amendment would accomplish that November 20, l984 request.
Florida Power & Light Company has determined that the proposed license amendment is strictly administrative in nature. The amendment does not change any technical specifications and is requested only to "clean-up" the operating license and clarify those outstanding license conditions. Therefore, it has been determined that no significant hazards consideration are involved.
 
~ ~}}

Revision as of 11:18, 29 October 2019

Application for Amend to License NPF-16,requesting That Referenced License Conditions Completed to Satisfaction of NRC Be Deleted in Future License Amend.Fee Paid
ML17301A145
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/25/1985
From: Williams J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17301A146 List:
References
L-85-41, NUDOCS 8502010511
Download: ML17301A145 (7)


Text

REGULATOR INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (RIDS)

ACCESS/ON NBR: 85P 2010511 . DOC ~ DATE', 85/01(25 NO'f ARI'ZEP! YES, DOCKEl." P FACIL,50 389 St.'ucie P)anti,Unit "2'< Flor ada Power 8 Liaht>> Co. 05000389 AUTH',NAME" AU/HOB AFFILIATION WILLIAMS'~J ~ H. F l or ada'Power. 8 Light Co,

'RECIP ~ NAME< RECIPIENT'PFILIATION EISENHUT'< Di G. Division- of - Licensing 4 V + V ~ M ~ ~ ' ~ . r, >>

SUBJECT!'pp) ication* for amend to.,License'PF16ieequestigg,that, h ~

r efer,encqd, ) )cense~ conditions, complete/;.to satisfaction. of NRC be< deleted in future license~ amend,Fee paid.

DISTR/BUTION CODE; $ 001D COPIES 'gECEIPED: L'TR ENCI 'IZE'! '~

Submittal! General Distr ibution

Ml,'ITLE OR 05000389 NOTES!'L:04i06/e3

., RECIPIENT COPIES RE C IP IEN7" . ,',COPIES ID" COD//NAPE LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME" ENCL' NRR>> ORB3 BC 01>> 7 7 INTERNAL: ACRS' 09 6 6 ADM/LFMB.

ELD/HDS2. 0 NRP/DE/MTEB 1:

NRR/DL'IR NRR/DL/QSRG NR R/D S I'/R A 8 1=

1 1

NR G

'~ 'TB NRR/DL/ORAB FILE>> 04

,1 1

0 f,i 1>>

1 1 RGN2 1 EXTERNAL! LPDR NSIC 03>>

05 NRC" PDR'2 TOTAL NUMBER~ OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 26 ENCL '23

h 1 rh fq II

)I r qif wg T T 'qh "hh""'if T cry 1 ~4,T f 'f ' i 'i '(II f 'lf,+4J T C ',iii*4" q) f if 4 IJI l P f 'f ff ) 4'l .f I)ir I if< II f'4 f f3 g I3l3 1 ~ gri' +q) rqe4I)41 rhq f4 ff ffqq 1 44 f)ll f )I po q

'3 f I'g,rf ' q)" T '~ fr,'ll ~ I ii ih Ili,rh 4 ~

>

' ~

. f4 Iq Tl C4 ff q

p qfn 1 '

P BOX 14000, JUNO BEACH, FL 33408 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY January 25, 198/15 L-85-41 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

Re: St. Lucie Unit No. 2 Docket No. 50-389, NFP-I 6 License Conditions Florida Power and Light Company Letter L-84-333, dated November 20, l984, provided a status of the St. Lucie Unit 2 License Conditions and requested that those conditions that have been completed to the satisfaction of NRC be deleted in a future license amendment.

The purpose of this letter is to request a license amendment which would accomplish our earlier request. Therefore, in accordance with IO CFR 50.90, submitted herewith are three signed originals and forty copies of a request to amend Operating License NPF- I 6.

The requested changes are indicated on the accompanying pages of the Operating License.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.9I and 50.92, Florida Power 8 Light Company has determined that this amendment does not involve any significant hazards considerations nor unreviewed safety question because deletion of license conditions which have been completed to NRC satisfaction is strictly administrative in nature.

In accordance with IO CFR I70.2 I, attached is a check for the $ 150.00 application fee.

In accordance with IO CFR 50.92(b)(l), a copy of the proposed amendment is being forwarded to the State Designee for the State of Florida.

85020105i PDR ADOCK i 850i 25 05000aa9 ylgO'~0 PDR PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

1 I

t

Page 2 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director This change has been reviewed by the St. Lucie Plant Facility Review Group and the Florida Power and Light Company Nuclear Review Board.

Very truly yours, Group Vice& sident Nuclear Energy JWW/R JS/cab A t tachment cc: J. P. O'Reilly, Director, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esquire Lyle Jerrett, Ph.D, Director

No Si ificant Hazards Considerations Determination Florida Power Bc Light Company has completed all but two (2.C.I2 and 2.C.I9) of the St. Lucie Unit 2 License Conditions. The NRC has reviewed FPL s implementation of the completed license conditions and has found the implementation satisfactory. By letter dated November 20, 1984 (L-84-333), FPL requested that NRC delete those license conditions that had been completed. This proposed license amendment would accomplish that November 20, l984 request.

Florida Power & Light Company has determined that the proposed license amendment is strictly administrative in nature. The amendment does not change any technical specifications and is requested only to "clean-up" the operating license and clarify those outstanding license conditions. Therefore, it has been determined that no significant hazards consideration are involved.

~ ~