ML17339A723: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 ygl tll/FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY January 25, 1977 L-77-32 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.Attention:
{{#Wiki_filter:. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 ygl tll/
Nr.Victor Stello, Director~Division of Operating Reactors U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555  
FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY January 25, 1977 L-77-32 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
.Attention: Nr. Victor Stello, Director
              ~
Division of Operating Reactors U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555


==Dear blr.Stello:==
==Dear blr. Stello:==
Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket.Nos.50-250 and 50-25'1 Proposed Amendment to Fac"lity eratin Licenses DPR-, 31 and DPR-41 Xn accordance irith 10 CFR 50.30, Florida Power and Light Company submits herewith three (3)'igned originals and forty (40)copies of a request to amend Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 and DPR-41.The proposed.change is described below and shown on the accompanying Techn'cal Specification page bearing the date of this letter in the lower right hand corner.Table 4.1-1 (Sheet 1)item 1, Remark 1 is revised to read."Load vs.flux curve, o IthT vs.reactor.power curve".The proposed change has been reviewed by the Turkey Point.>lant Nuclear Safety Committee and the Flor'da Power 6 Light Company Nuclear Review Board.They have concluded that it does not involve an unreviewed safety question.A safety evaluation is attached.V ery truly yours, lr.'r"~j~~./Q.r'(~!'at~(ROBERT E-UHRXG Vice President REU/AS/cmp Attachment cc: No man C.Noseley, Region ZX Robert Lowenstein, Esqu're 8 0 082 40 5+'8 PEOPLE...SERVING PEOPLE Oi}}
 
Re:   Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket. Nos. 50-250 and 50-25'1 Proposed Amendment to Fac"lity eratin Licenses DPR-, 31 and DPR-41 Xn accordance irith 10 CFR 50.30, Florida Power and Light Company   submits herewith three (3)'igned originals and forty (40) copies of a requestDPR-31    to amend Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses                 and DPR-41.
The proposed. change         is described below and shown on the accompanying     Techn'cal     Specification page bearing the date of this letter in the lower right hand corner.
Table 4.1-1 (Sheet 1) item 1, Remark 1 is revised to read.
            "Load vs. flux curve, o IthT vs. reactor.
power curve".
The proposed change has been reviewed by the Turkey Point.
>lant Nuclear Safety Committee and the Flor'da Power 6 Light Company Nuclear Review Board. They have concluded that safety it does not involve an unreviewed safety question.
evaluation       is attached.
A Very  truly yours, lr.'r"
        ~j~~./ Q. r'(~!'at ~(
ROBERT E- UHRXG Vice President REU/AS/cmp Attachment cc:   No man C. Noseley, Region       ZX Robert Lowenstein, Esqu're                     80  082 40 5+'8 PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
 
Oi}}

Latest revision as of 11:21, 22 October 2019

Application to Amend App a of Licenses DPR-31 & 41 to Change Tech Specs,Table 4.1-1 Re Load & Flux Curves
ML17339A723
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/25/1977
From: Robert E. Uhrig
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17339A722 List:
References
L-77-32, NUDOCS 8003240538
Download: ML17339A723 (2)


Text

. BOX 013100, MIAMI, FL 33101 ygl tll/

FLORIDA POWER 6 LIGHT COMPANY January 25, 1977 L-77-32 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

.Attention: Nr. Victor Stello, Director

~

Division of Operating Reactors U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear blr. Stello:

Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket. Nos. 50-250 and 50-25'1 Proposed Amendment to Fac"lity eratin Licenses DPR-, 31 and DPR-41 Xn accordance irith 10 CFR 50.30, Florida Power and Light Company submits herewith three (3)'igned originals and forty (40) copies of a requestDPR-31 to amend Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses and DPR-41.

The proposed. change is described below and shown on the accompanying Techn'cal Specification page bearing the date of this letter in the lower right hand corner.

Table 4.1-1 (Sheet 1) item 1, Remark 1 is revised to read.

"Load vs. flux curve, o IthT vs. reactor.

power curve".

The proposed change has been reviewed by the Turkey Point.

>lant Nuclear Safety Committee and the Flor'da Power 6 Light Company Nuclear Review Board. They have concluded that safety it does not involve an unreviewed safety question.

evaluation is attached.

A Very truly yours, lr.'r"

~j~~./ Q. r'(~!'at ~(

ROBERT E- UHRXG Vice President REU/AS/cmp Attachment cc: No man C. Noseley, Region ZX Robert Lowenstein, Esqu're 80 082 40 5+'8 PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE

Oi