ML19233A049: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Brady, Bennett To: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc)
{{#Wiki_filter:From:             Brady, Bennett To:               Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc)
Cc: Weyhmuller, Paul R:(GenCo-Nuc)
Cc:               Weyhmuller, Paul R:(GenCo-Nuc); Warfel Sr, Donald B:(GenCo-Nuc); Tamburro, Peter:(GenCo-Nuc)
; Warfel Sr, Donald B:(GenCo-Nuc)
; Tamburro, Peter:(GenCo-Nuc)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: RE: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Date: Thursday, February 14, 2019 3:41:00 PM I sent an email to Andrew and his branch chief but have not heard from them.
RE: RE: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Date:             Thursday, February 14, 2019 3:41:00 PM I sent an email to Andrew and his branch chief but have not heard from them. They could be at Seabrook.
They could be   at Seabrook.
Bennett From: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc) [mailto:David.Distel@exeloncorp.com]
Bennett From: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc) [mailto:David.Distel@exeloncorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:59 PM To: Brady, Bennett <Bennett.Brady@nrc.gov>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:59 PM To: Brady, Bennett <Bennett.Brady@nrc.gov>
Cc: Weyhmuller, Paul R:(GenCo-Nuc) <paul.weyhmuller@exeloncorp.com>; Warfel Sr, Donald B: (GenCo-Nuc) <donald.warfel@exeloncorp.com>; Tamburro, Peter:(GenCo-Nuc)
Cc: Weyhmuller, Paul R:(GenCo-Nuc) <paul.weyhmuller@exeloncorp.com>; Warfel Sr, Donald B:
(GenCo-Nuc) <donald.warfel@exeloncorp.com>; Tamburro, Peter:(GenCo-Nuc)
<Peter.Tamburro@exeloncorp.com>
<Peter.Tamburro@exeloncorp.com>


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] RE: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Bennett - Based on our discussion, please let me know if you have any feedback on the proposed alternate approach to provide a supplemental additional information docketed submittal for this material rather than a Supplement to the SLRA, since this material does not belong in the SLRA itself. The proposed supplemental additional information docketed submittal would also alleviate an RAI, and could be docketed in a relatively short time frame.
[External_Sender] RE: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Bennett - Based on our discussion, please let me know if you have any feedback on the proposed alternate approach to provide a supplemental additional information docketed submittal for this material rather than a Supplement to the SLRA, since this material does not belong in the SLRA itself. The proposed supplemental additional information docketed submittal would also alleviate an RAI, and could be docketed in a relatively short time frame.
Thanks.Dave Distel From: Brady, Bennett <
Thanks.
Bennett.Brady@nrc.gov
Dave Distel From: Brady, Bennett <Bennett.Brady@nrc.gov>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 8:18 PM To: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc) <
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 8:18 PM To: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc) <David.Distel@exeloncorp.com>
David.Distel@exeloncorp.com
Cc: Prinaris, Andrew <Andrew.Prinaris@nrc.gov>
>Cc: Prinaris, Andrew <
Andrew.Prinaris@nrc.gov
>


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[EXTERNAL] Fw: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Dave, Andrew Prinaris would like for Exelon to provide a supplement to the Peach Bottom application Section 4.6 with the material that you have already provided.
[EXTERNAL] Fw: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6
Andrew explains below the document he wants you to use and sections he would like supplemented in Section 4.6. This will alleviate an RAI.
: Dave, Andrew Prinaris would like for Exelon to provide a supplement to the Peach Bottom application Section 4.6 with the material that you have already provided. Andrew explains below the document he wants you to use and sections he would like supplemented in Section 4.6.
This will alleviate an RAI.
If you have any questions, let me know and I will set up a conference call.
If you have any questions, let me know and I will set up a conference call.


Line 47: Line 43:
==Subject:==
==Subject:==
PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Hello Bennett:
PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Hello Bennett:
I would appreciate if you could request PBAPS at its earliest opportunity to supplement SLRA Sections 4.6, 4.6.1, and 4.6.2 with their clarification responses made (in their entirety).
I would appreciate if you could request PBAPS at its earliest opportunity to supplement SLRA Sections 4.6, 4.6.1, and 4.6.2 with their clarification responses made (in their entirety). This potentially would alleviate the need to re-request the same clarifications to be made in form of RAIs.
This potentially would alleviate the need to re-request the same clarifications to be made in form of RAIs.
Specifically from portal bullet: 01-17-19 Prinaris PBAPS TLAA Prim. Cont. Fatigue Analyses Clarification Questions-Rev 2, to supplement 4.6 with responses made to C4.6-3 to supplement 4.6.1 with responses made to C4.6-1, C4.6-2, C4.6-4 to supplement 4.6.2 with responses made to C4.6-5 Please let me if you have any questions Thanks Andrew This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Exelon Corporation or its affiliates ("Exelon"). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. Exelon policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. Exelon will not accept any liability in respect of such communications. -
Specifically from portal bullet:
EXCIP}}
01-17-19 Prinaris PBAPS TLAA Prim. Cont. Fatigue Analyses Clarification Questions-Rev 2, to supplement 4.6 with responses made to C4.6-3 to supplement 4.6.1 with responses made to C4.6-1, C4.6-2, C4.6-4 to supplement 4.6.2 with responses made to C4.6-5 Please let me if you have any questions Thanks Andrew This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Exelon Corporation or its affiliates ("Exelon"). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. Exelon policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. Exelon will not accept any liability in respect of such communications.
-EXCIP}}

Latest revision as of 00:07, 8 October 2019

PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6
ML19233A049
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/14/2019
From: Bennett B
NRC/NRR/DMLR/MRPB
To: Distel D
Exelon Corp
Bennett B, NRR-DMLR 415-2981
References
Download: ML19233A049 (2)


Text

From: Brady, Bennett To: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc)

Cc: Weyhmuller, Paul R:(GenCo-Nuc); Warfel Sr, Donald B:(GenCo-Nuc); Tamburro, Peter:(GenCo-Nuc)

Subject:

RE: RE: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Date: Thursday, February 14, 2019 3:41:00 PM I sent an email to Andrew and his branch chief but have not heard from them. They could be at Seabrook.

Bennett From: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc) [1]

Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 12:59 PM To: Brady, Bennett <Bennett.Brady@nrc.gov>

Cc: Weyhmuller, Paul R:(GenCo-Nuc) <paul.weyhmuller@exeloncorp.com>; Warfel Sr, Donald B:

(GenCo-Nuc) <donald.warfel@exeloncorp.com>; Tamburro, Peter:(GenCo-Nuc)

<Peter.Tamburro@exeloncorp.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Bennett - Based on our discussion, please let me know if you have any feedback on the proposed alternate approach to provide a supplemental additional information docketed submittal for this material rather than a Supplement to the SLRA, since this material does not belong in the SLRA itself. The proposed supplemental additional information docketed submittal would also alleviate an RAI, and could be docketed in a relatively short time frame.

Thanks.

Dave Distel From: Brady, Bennett <Bennett.Brady@nrc.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 8:18 PM To: Distel, David J:(GenCo-Nuc) <David.Distel@exeloncorp.com>

Cc: Prinaris, Andrew <Andrew.Prinaris@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[EXTERNAL] Fw: PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6

Dave, Andrew Prinaris would like for Exelon to provide a supplement to the Peach Bottom application Section 4.6 with the material that you have already provided. Andrew explains below the document he wants you to use and sections he would like supplemented in Section 4.6.

This will alleviate an RAI.

If you have any questions, let me know and I will set up a conference call.

From: Prinaris, Andrew Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 3:48 PM To: Brady, Bennett

Subject:

PBAPS SLRA Supplement - Section 4.6 Hello Bennett:

I would appreciate if you could request PBAPS at its earliest opportunity to supplement SLRA Sections 4.6, 4.6.1, and 4.6.2 with their clarification responses made (in their entirety). This potentially would alleviate the need to re-request the same clarifications to be made in form of RAIs.

Specifically from portal bullet: 01-17-19 Prinaris PBAPS TLAA Prim. Cont. Fatigue Analyses Clarification Questions-Rev 2, to supplement 4.6 with responses made to C4.6-3 to supplement 4.6.1 with responses made to C4.6-1, C4.6-2, C4.6-4 to supplement 4.6.2 with responses made to C4.6-5 Please let me if you have any questions Thanks Andrew This Email message and any attachment may contain information that is proprietary, legally privileged, confidential and/or subject to copyright belonging to Exelon Corporation or its affiliates ("Exelon"). This Email is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery of this Email to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this Email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete this Email and any copies. Exelon policies expressly prohibit employees from making defamatory or offensive statements and infringing any copyright or any other legal right by Email communication. Exelon will not accept any liability in respect of such communications. -

EXCIP