IR 05000263/2006001: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML060610424 | | number = ML060610424 | ||
| issue date = 03/02/2006 | | issue date = 03/02/2006 | ||
| title = | | title = (EOC) Annual Assessment Letter (Report 05000263/2006-001) | ||
| author name = Burgess B | | author name = Burgess B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB2 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB2 | ||
| addressee name = Conway J | | addressee name = Conway J | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter | {{#Wiki_filter:March 2, 2006 Mr. Site Vice President | ||
Mr. Site Vice President | |||
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant | Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant | ||
| Line 29: | Line 26: | ||
2807 West County Road 75 | 2807 West County Road 75 | ||
Monticello, MN 55362- | Monticello, MN 55362-9637SUBJECT:ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - MONTICELLO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (REPORT 05000263/2006001) | ||
==Dear Mr. Conway:== | ==Dear Mr. Conway:== | ||
| Line 74: | Line 69: | ||
review. | review. | ||
J. Conway-2- | J. Conway-2-In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public | |||
Document Room or from the Publicly Ava ilable Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at | Document Room or from the Publicly Ava ilable Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at | ||
| Line 85: | Line 79: | ||
questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan. | questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan. | ||
Sincerely,/RA/Bruce Burgess, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/Bruce Burgess, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 | |||
Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22Enclosure:Monticello Inspection/ Activity Plan cc w/encl:M. Sellman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
Monticello Inspection/ Activity Plan cc w/encl:M. Sellman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
Manager, Regulatory Affairs | Manager, Regulatory Affairs | ||
Revision as of 22:35, 13 July 2019
| ML060610424 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/2006 |
| From: | Burgess B NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB2 |
| To: | Conway J Nuclear Management Co |
| References | |
| IR-06-001 | |
| Download: ML060610424 (5) | |
Text
March 2, 2006 Mr. Site Vice President
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
Nuclear Management Company, LLC
2807 West County Road 75
Monticello, MN 55362-9637SUBJECT:ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LETTER - MONTICELLO NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (REPORT 05000263/2006001)
Dear Mr. Conway:
On February 9, 2006, the NRC staff completed its performance review of the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant. Our technical staff reviewed performance indicators (PIs) for the most recent
quarter and inspection results for the period from January 1 through December 31, 2005. The
purpose of this letter is to inform you of our assessment of your safety performance during this period and our plans for future inspections at your facility.
This performance review and enclosed inspection plan do not include physical protection information. A separate letter designated and marked as "Exempt from Public Disclosure in
accordance with 10 CFR 2.390" will include the physical protection review and resultant
inspection plan.
Overall, the Monticello Nuclear Power Plant operated in a manner that preserved public health and safety and fully met all cornerstone objectives. Plant performance for the most recent
quarter, as well as for the first three quarters of the assessment cycle, was within the Licensee
Response Column of the NRC's Action Matrix, based on all inspection findings being classified
as having very low safety significance (Green) and all PIs indicating performance at a level
requiring no additional NRC oversight (Green). Therefore, we plan to conduct only reactor
oversight process baseline inspections at your facility.
The enclosed inspection plan details the inspections, less those related to physical protection scheduled through September 30, 2007. Significant inspections include a Component Design
Basis Inspection in May 2006, a Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection in
November 2006, and an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Preoperational Inspection
in May 2007. The inspection plan is provided to allow for the resolution of any scheduling
conflicts and personnel availability issues well in advance of inspector arrival onsite. Routine
resident inspections are not listed due to their ongoing and continuous nature. The inspections
in the last 9 months of the inspection plan are tentative and may be revised at the mid-cycle
review.
J. Conway-2-In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and its enclosure will be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public
Document Room or from the Publicly Ava ilable Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
If circumstances arise which cause us to change this inspection plan, we will contact you to discuss the change as soon as possible. Please contact me at (630) 829-9629 with any
questions you may have regarding this letter or the inspection plan.
Sincerely,
/RA/Bruce Burgess, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2
Division of Reactor Projects Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22Enclosure:Monticello Inspection/ Activity Plan cc w/encl:M. Sellman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Nuclear Officer
Manager, Regulatory Affairs
J. Rogoff, Vice President, Counsel, and Secretary Nuclear Asset Manager, Xcel Energy, Inc.
Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Health
R. Nelson, President
Minnesota Environmental Control Citizens Association (MECCA)
Commissioner, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
D. Gruber, Auditor/Treasurer, Wright County Government Center
Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Commerce
Manager - Environmental Protection Division
Minnesota Attorney General's Office
Chairman, Wright County Board
Mayor of Monticello
Chairperson, Sherburne County
Administrator, City of Monticello