ML12125A168

Memorandum and Order (Initial Prehearing Order)

ML12125A168
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	05/04/2012
From:	Bollwerk G Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22402, 50-483-LR, ASLBP 12-919-06-LR-BD01
Download: ML12125A168 (8)

Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD PANEL Before the Licensing Board:

G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Chair William J. Froehlich Nicholas G. Trikouros In the Matter of Union Electric Company (Callaway Plant, Unit 1)

Docket No. 50-483-LR

ASLBP No. 12-919-06-LR-BD01

May 4, 2012 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Initial Prehearing Order)

In the above-captioned proceeding, at issue is a December 15, 2011 application submitted by Union Electric Company (U EC) requesting that the Nuclear Regulatory

Commission (NRC) issue a twenty-year renewal for the currently in-force 10 C.F.R. Part 50

license authorizing UEC to operate the Callaway Plant, Unit 1, in Callaway County, Missouri.

See License Renewal Application, Callaway Plant Unit 1, Facility Operating License No. NPF-30 (Dec. 15, 2011) (ADAMS Accession No. ML113530372). Responding to a February 16, 2012

agency hearing opportunity notice, see Renewal of Facility Operating License NPF-30, [UEC], Callaway Plant, Unit 1, 77 Fed. Reg. 11,173 (Feb. 24, 2012), by a hearing petition dated

April 24, 2012, public interest group Missouri Coalition for the Environment (MCE) submitted

three contentions challenging the validity of the UEC licensing request, see

[MCE] Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene in License Renewal Proceeding for Callaway Nuclear Power

Plant (Apr. 24, 2012) at 1. By memorandum dated April 27, 2012, the Acting Secretary of the Commission referred this petition to the Chief Administrative Judge, see Memorandum from Andrew L. Bates, Acting NRC Secretary, to E. Roy Hawkens, Chief Administrative Judge (April 27, 2012) at 1, who, in turn, referred the MCE submission to this Licensing Board to rule on standing and contention

admissibility matters and preside at any hearing, see

[UEC], Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, 77 Fed. Reg. (May 7, 2012).

Relative to the conduct of this proceeding, the following directives shall apply:

I. ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERSA.Notice of Appearance If they have not already done so, on or before Tuesday, May 8, 2012 , each counsel or representative for each participant shall file a notice of appearance complying with the

requirements of 10 C.F.R. § 2.314(b). In each notice of appearance, besides providing a

business address and telephone number, an attorney or representative should provide a facsimile number and an internet e-mail address.

B.Limitations on Pleading Length and Reply Pleadings1.Page Limitation

Any motion filed after the date of this memorandum and order and any related responsive pleadings shall not exceed ten pages in length (including signature page) absent

preapproval of the presiding officer.

1 A request for presiding officer preapproval to exceed this 1 Any answers/replies associated with MCE's April 2012 hearing request are not subject to this page limitation. However, any subsequent motion for admission of a new or amended contention under section 2.309(f)(2) and any response/reply thereto is subject to this page

limitation. In an instance when more than one new or amended contention is being filed in

connection with information that is asserted to provide the basis for a motion to admit new or

amended contentions, see infra n.3, because the page limit applies regardless of the number of (continued...) page limitation shall be submitted in writing no less than three business days prior to the time the motion or responsive pleading is filed or due to be filed. A request to exceed this page

limitation must (1) indicate whether the request is opposed or supported by the other

participants to the proceeding; (2) provide a good faith estimate of the number of additional

pages that will be filed; and (3) demonstrate good cause for being permitted to exceed the page

limitation.2.Reply Pleadings

In accordance with the agency's rules of practice, except in instances involving a motion to file a new/amended contention, see 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(c), (f)(2), leave must be sought to file a reply to a response to a motion. Compare 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(c) with id. § 2.309(h)(2). A request for presiding officer preapproval to file a reply shall be submitted in writing no less than

three business days prior to the time the reply will be filed.

2 A request to file a reply must (1) indicate whether the request is opposed or supported by the other participants to the particular

proceeding; and (2) demonstrate good cause for permitting the reply to be filed.

C.Motions for Extension of Time A motion for extension of time in this proceeding shall be submitted in writing at least three business days before the due date for the pleading or other submission for which an 1 (...continued) contentions involved, in lieu of filing multiple separate motions of ten pages seeking the admission of each individual contention, it would be preferable to seek leave of the Board to

exceed the page limit. If granted, this would permit the participant to file one timely motion that

deals with all the contentions being proffered relative to a particular triggering event.

2 Although the agency's rules of practice regarding motions practice do not provide for reply pleadings, the Board will presume that for a reply to be timely, it would have to be filed

within seven days of the date of service of the response it is intended to address. See 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(h)(2). extension is sought.

3 A motion for extension of time must (1) indicate whether the request is opposed or supported by the other participants to the particular proceeding; and (2) demonstrate appropriate cause that supports permitting the extension.

D.Opposing a Request to Exceed the Page Limitation, to File a Reply, or to Extend the Time for Filing a Pleading

Any written opposition to a request to exceed the page limit, to file a reply, or to extend the time for filing a pleading shall be filed on the next business day after the filing of the request.

E.Attachments/Enclosures to Filings and Evidentiary Exhibits If a participant henceforth files a pleading or other submission that has additional documents appended to it, these items should be referred to as attachments or enclosures (not

exhibits) and a separate alpha or numeric designation should be given to each appended

document (e.g., Attachment A, Enclosure 1), either on the first page of the appended document

or on a cover/divider sheet in front of the appended document. Attachments or enclosures to a

motion and any related responsive pleadings are not subject to the page limitation set forth in

section II.B.1 above, but should be submitted via the agency's E-Filing system as part of a

single electronic file that consists of the pleading or other submission, the certificate of service, and all the attachments or enclosures associated with the pleading or submission. In

accordance with the agency's E-Filing guidance, multiple electronic files should be used for

pleadings or submissions with attachments or enclosures only if the filing exceeds fifteen 3 In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 2.323(a), unless some other time is specified in the agency's rules of practice or by the Board, motions generally are due within 10 days after the occurrence or circumstance from which the motion arises, with any response to that motion due

within 10 days of service of the motion. The Board notes, however, relative to motions seeking

the admission of new/amended contentions, see 10 C.F.R. § 2.309(f)(2), that to be considered timely such motions should be filed within 30 days of the date upon which the information that is

the basis of the motion becomes available to the petitioner/intervenor, with any response to

such a motion due within 14 days of service of the motion, and any reply to a response due

within seven days of service of the response. megabytes in size. See NRC, Guidance for Electronic Submissions to the NRC at 15 (rev. 6.1 May 27, 2011), http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html.

The label "exhibit" shall be reserved for use as a designation for those items that are submitted, whether by prefiling or at the time of an evidentiary hearing, as potential materials a participant will seek to have identified for inclusion in the evidentiary record of the proceeding.

Exhibits (and prefiled written testimony) shall be submitted via the agency's E-Filing system as

separate electronic files. See 10 C.F.R. § 2.304(g). F.Filing Date on Pleadings The Board requests that the first page of each pleading submitted by a participant include the pleading's filing date in the upper right hand corner or as part of the caption.

II. Initial Prehearing Conference The Board wishes to advise the participants that it likely will hold an initial prehearing conference to hear argument regarding any disput es over MCE's standing or the admissibility of its three proffered contentions. If the Board does convene such a proceeding, absent some

other proposal by the participants, 4 the Board will hold the prehearing conference at a venue in the vicinity of the Callaway facility. The Board is available on the following days and

times to conduct a conference near the Callaway facility, which the Board anticipates should

last no more than one day:

4 The Board notes that it appears at least one counsel for UEC, the staff, and MEC, as well as the supporting technical affiant for MEC, are located in the Washington, D.C. area.

Under the circumstances, the Board would entertain a request to hold the conference in the

Licensing Board Panel's hearing room in Rockville, Maryland, if that is the participants'

preference. Also, if the conference were conducted in Rockville, the following dates (in addition

to those specified in the text below) would be available: Tuesday, June 5; Friday, June 8; and

Monday, June 11. Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Thursday, June 7, 2012

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Wednesday, June 13, 2012 The Board requests that on or before Tuesday, May 8, 2012 , UEC, the staff, and MCE provide the Board with a joint report that specifies on which of the above dates all the

participants are available for an initial prehearing conference. Thereafter, the Board will notify

the participants about the date, location, and starting time of the conference, and any additional

logistical information such as oral argument time allocations.

It is so ORDERED.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

G. Paul Bollwerk, III CHAIR Rockville, Maryland May 4, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) )

UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AmerenUE )

)

) Docket No. 50-483-LR (Callaway Power Plant, Unit 1) ) )

(License Renewal) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (INITIAL PREHEARING ORDER) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information

Exchange.

Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Hearing Docket

E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Mail Stop - T-3 F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001

G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Chair Administrative Judge E-mail: paul.bollwerk@nrc.gov

William J. Froehlich Administrative Judge E-mail: william.froehlich@nrc.gov Dr. Nicholas G. Trikouros

Administrative Judge

E-mail: nicholas.trikouros@nrc.gov

Matthew Flyntz, Law Clerk

Email: Matthew.Flyntz@nrc.gov Union Electric Company Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP

2300 N. Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1122

David R. Lewis, Esq. Counsel for the Applicant E-mail: david.lewis@pillsburylaw.com

Docket No. 50-483-LR 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (INITIAL PREHEARING ORDER)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop - O-15 D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Edward Williamson, Esq.

Mary Spencer, Esq. Catherine Kanatas, Esq.

Anita Ghosh, Esq.

Beth N. Mizuno, Esq.

Brian Newell, Paralegal

edward.williamson@nrc.gov mary.spencer@nrc.gov catherine.kanatas@nrc.gov anita.ghosh@nrc.gov beth.mizuno@nrc.gov brian.newell@nrc.gov OGG Mail Center: ogcmailcenter@nrc.gov

Missouri Coalition for the Environment Edward Smith, Safe Energy Director

Diane Curran, Esq.

showmenocwip@gmail.com dcurran@harmoncurran.com

[Original signed by Evangeline S. Ngbea ]

__________________________________ Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland

this 4 th day of May 2012