ML17108A467: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIAEach JPM includes the following, as applicable:
{{#Wiki_filter:2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions ntiating cuesreferences and tools, including associated procedures aaaaand specificsystem response and other examiner cuesstatements descrbng important observatons to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the taskidentification of critcal steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Facility:
initial conditions ntiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures a a a a and specific system response and other examiner cues statements descrbng important observatons to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critcal steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Facility:
ClintonDate of Examinalion:1130/17 Operating Test Number: 2017-301lntals1. GENERAL CRITERIAab.c#The operating test conforms with the prevously approved outline; changes are consistent withsampling requirements (e.9., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
Clinton Date of Examinalion:1130/17 Operating Test Number: 2017-301 lntals 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b.c#The operating test conforms with the prevously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.9., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
a.6+qq,úqqThere is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered duringthis examination.
a.6+qq ,úq q There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
b.The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).c.,{+w,l+carOverlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is withinacceptable limits.d.It appears lhat the operating applicants at the designated test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent license level.e.fr+1I/..ørry{+aEnsure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to devate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.9., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinatons) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.
b.The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).c.,{+w ,l+car Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.d.It appears lhat the operating applicants at the designated test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent license level.e.fr+1 I/..ør ry{+a Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to devate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.9., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinatons) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.b.3. SIMULATOR CRITERIAø+ry The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (.)c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC Supervisor
b.3. SIMULATOR CRITERIAø+ryThe associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance withForm ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
/ Signature 10120/16 tlfi lun c r/,t I zor: Date 10120116- The facilig signature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.NOTE: ES-301, Page 24 of 27}}
: a. Authorb. Facility Reviewer  
(.)c. NRC Chief Examiner  
(#)d. NRC Supervisor
/ Signature 10120/16tlfi luncr/,t I zor:Date10120116- The facilig signature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.
NOTE:ES-301, Page 24 of 27}}

Revision as of 22:57, 7 July 2018

2017 Clinton Power Station Initial Licensed Operator Examination Form ES-301-3
ML17108A467
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/09/2017
From: Zoia C D
Operations Branch III
To:
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
Shared Package
ML16308A466 List:
References
50-461/17-301
Download: ML17108A467 (1)


Text

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions ntiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures a a a a and specific system response and other examiner cues statements descrbng important observatons to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critcal steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable Facility:

Clinton Date of Examinalion:1130/17 Operating Test Number: 2017-301 lntals 1. GENERAL CRITERIA a b.c#The operating test conforms with the prevously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.9., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

a.6+qq ,úq q There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

b.The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).c.,{+w ,l+car Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.d.It appears lhat the operating applicants at the designated test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent license level.e.fr+1 I/..ør ry{+a Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to devate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.9., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinatons) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.b.3. SIMULATOR CRITERIAø+ry The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (.)c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC Supervisor

/ Signature 10120/16 tlfi lun c r/,t I zor: Date 10120116- The facilig signature is not applicable for NRO-developed tests# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.NOTE: ES-301, Page 24 of 27