ML17208A158: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 21: Line 21:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
  [External_Sender] Discussion of I&C Related Issues regarding TSTF-505 Michelle, The industry would like to discuss three issues related to instrumentation and control (I&C) systems modified by TSTF-505. These issues were raised by the NRC the May 4, 2017 document.
  [External_Sender] Discussion of I&C Related Issues regarding TSTF-505 Michelle,  
Issue 1:  Many of the Conditions in the NRC's table are for conditions similar to "One or more channels-inoperable" or "two or more channels-inoperable."  While the safety function may be performed with some number of channels inoperable, it may not be possible to perform the function for all circumstances in which the phrase "or more" would be applicable. 


Industry Suggested Resolution:  An alternative to the presentation in TSTF-505 would be to limit the TS Condition to when the minimum number of channels needed to perform the function are operable (assuming no additional failures). The Required Actions and Completion Times would be the same and would provide the option to calculate a RICT. Either a new condition would be created that applies when less than the minimum number of channels are operable or, depending on the construction of the TS, LCO 3.0.3 would apply. The licensee would need to justify that the function can still be performed in the revised Action.  
The industry would like to discuss three issues related to instrumentation and control (I&C) systems modified by TSTF-505. These issues were raised by the NRC the May 4, 2017 document.
 
Issue 1:  Many of the Conditions in the NRC's t able are for conditions similar to "One or more channels-inoperable" or "two or more channels-inoperable."  While the safety function may be performed with some number of channels inoperable, it may not be possible to perform the functi on for all circumstances in which the phrase "or more" would be applicable. 
 
Industry Suggested Resolution:  An alternat ive to the presentat ion in TSTF-505 would be to limit the TS Condition to when the minimum number of channels needed to perform the function are operable (assuming no additional failures). The Required Actions and Completion Times would be th e same and would provide the option to calculate a RICT. Either a new condition would be created that applies when less than the minimum number of channels are operabl e or, depending on the construction of the TS, LCO 3.0.3 would apply. The licensee would need to justify that the function can still be performed in the revised Action.
 
Issue 2:  The NRC table included the following for NUREG-1431, Westinghouse plants:
NUREG-1431 LCO Condition  LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes 3.3.1.F LCO:  The RTS instrumentation for each Function in Table 3.3.1-1 shall be OPERABLE.
 
Condition:  One Power Range Neutron Flux - High channel inoperable.
Treat as LOF Industry Question:  Please explain why one Power Range Neutron Flux - High channel inoperable is treated as a lo ss of the ability to perform the safety function. 
 
Issue 3:  The NRC table included the following for NUREG-1431, Westinghouse plants:
NUREG-1431 LCO
 
Condition  LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes NUREG-1431 LCO Condition  LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes 3.3.1.DD LCO:  The RTS instrumentation for each Function in Table 3.3.1-1 shall be OPERABLE.
Condition:  One RTB train inoperable.
Treat as LOF.
Industry Question: As the Reactor Trip Breaker trains are independent and redundant, plese explain why one inoperable RTB trai n would prevent the performance of the safety function.


Issue 2:  The NRC table included the following for NUREG-1431, Westinghouse plants:  NUREG-1431 LCO Condition  LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes 3.3.1.F LCO:  The RTS instrumentation for each Function in Table 3.3.1-1 shall be OPERABLE.
Condition:  One Power Range Neutron Flux - High channel inoperable. Treat as LOF  Industry Question:  Please explain why one Power Range Neutron Flux - High channel inoperable is treated as a loss of the ability to perform the safety function.
Issue 3:  The NRC table included the following for NUREG-1431, Westinghouse plants:  NUREG-1431 LCO Condition  LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes NUREG-1431 LCO Condition  LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes 3.3.1.DD LCO:  The RTS instrumentation for each Function in Table 3.3.1-1 shall be OPERABLE. Condition:  One RTB train inoperable. Treat as LOF. Industry Question: As the Reactor Trip Breaker trains are independent and redundant, plese explain why one inoperable RTB train would prevent the performance of the safety function.
We look forward to discussing these issues with the NRC staff.  
We look forward to discussing these issues with the NRC staff.  


Brian  
Brian  


Brian D. Mann Vice President of Industry Programs and Services EXCEL Services Corporation Mobile (804) 339-7034 Main    (301) 984-4400 E-mail: brian.mann@excelservices.com Web: www.excelservices.com Web: www.nukapedia.com}}
Brian D. Mann Vice President of Indus try Programs and Services EXCEL Services Corporation Mobile (804) 339-7034 Main    (301) 984-4400 E-mail: brian.mann@excelservices.com Web: www.excelservices.com Web: www.nukapedia.com}}

Revision as of 17:19, 29 June 2018

Discussion of I&C Related Issues Regarding TSTF-505 for July 25 and Augsut 1, 2017 Teleconferences
ML17208A158
Person / Time
Site: Technical Specifications Task Force
Issue date: 07/24/2017
From: Mann B D
Excel Services Corp
To: Michelle Honcharik
NRC/NRR/DSS/STSB
Honcharik M C
References
TSTF-505
Download: ML17208A158 (2)


Text

From: Brian Mann <Brian.Mann@excelservices.com> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2017 2:38 PM To: Honcharik, Michelle Cc: ANDERSON, Victoria; Tjader, Theodore; kjse@pge.com; Myung.Kang@duke-energy.com

Subject:

[External_Sender] Discussion of I&C Related Issues regarding TSTF-505 Michelle,

The industry would like to discuss three issues related to instrumentation and control (I&C) systems modified by TSTF-505. These issues were raised by the NRC the May 4, 2017 document.

Issue 1: Many of the Conditions in the NRC's t able are for conditions similar to "One or more channels-inoperable" or "two or more channels-inoperable." While the safety function may be performed with some number of channels inoperable, it may not be possible to perform the functi on for all circumstances in which the phrase "or more" would be applicable.

Industry Suggested Resolution: An alternat ive to the presentat ion in TSTF-505 would be to limit the TS Condition to when the minimum number of channels needed to perform the function are operable (assuming no additional failures). The Required Actions and Completion Times would be th e same and would provide the option to calculate a RICT. Either a new condition would be created that applies when less than the minimum number of channels are operabl e or, depending on the construction of the TS, LCO 3.0.3 would apply. The licensee would need to justify that the function can still be performed in the revised Action.

Issue 2: The NRC table included the following for NUREG-1431, Westinghouse plants:

NUREG-1431 LCO Condition LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes 3.3.1.F LCO: The RTS instrumentation for each Function in Table 3.3.1-1 shall be OPERABLE.

Condition: One Power Range Neutron Flux - High channel inoperable.

Treat as LOF Industry Question: Please explain why one Power Range Neutron Flux - High channel inoperable is treated as a lo ss of the ability to perform the safety function.

Issue 3: The NRC table included the following for NUREG-1431, Westinghouse plants:

NUREG-1431 LCO

Condition LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes NUREG-1431 LCO Condition LCO and Condition Text/Description Comments/ Notes 3.3.1.DD LCO: The RTS instrumentation for each Function in Table 3.3.1-1 shall be OPERABLE.

Condition: One RTB train inoperable.

Treat as LOF.

Industry Question: As the Reactor Trip Breaker trains are independent and redundant, plese explain why one inoperable RTB trai n would prevent the performance of the safety function.

We look forward to discussing these issues with the NRC staff.

Brian

Brian D. Mann Vice President of Indus try Programs and Services EXCEL Services Corporation Mobile (804) 339-7034 Main (301) 984-4400 E-mail: brian.mann@excelservices.com Web: www.excelservices.com Web: www.nukapedia.com