|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML23209A0442023-07-25025 July 2023
Email Concurrence for DSS Log 2188 (TSTF-584)
ML22235A7382022-08-19019 August 2022
NRR E-mail Capture - Draft RAIs for TSTF-591 (L-2022-PMP-0003)
ML21218A0892021-08-0404 August 2021
Email of Feedback on Draft Traveler TSTF-588, Remove List of COLR (Core Operating Limits Report Methods
ML21266A4122021-07-0101 July 2021
Feedback on Interaction of Inservice Testing (IST) and 10 CFR 50.69
ML21109A1412021-04-0606 April 2021
TSTF-585 Rev. 0 Revise LCO 3.0.3
ML21097A1902021-04-0101 April 2021
Email: Minor Comment on TSTF-577 Draft SE
ML21097A1872021-03-30030 March 2021
Email: TSTF Review of Draft Safety Evaluations for TSTF-577, Rev. 1, Revised Frequencies for Steam Generator Tube Inspections
ML18262A3732018-09-0707 September 2018
Industry Analysis of Whether Open Phase Condition Equipment Requirements Should Be Included in the Technical Specifications
ML18122A1642018-04-27027 April 2018
E-mail Transmitting TSTF-568 Draft RAIs
ML17297B7452017-10-24024 October 2017
Input to Friday'S Call on TSTF-542
ML17289A9292017-10-16016 October 2017
TSTF-542 Issue That Affects BWR5 and BWR6 Plants
ML17208A1582017-07-24024 July 2017
Discussion of I&C Related Issues Regarding TSTF-505 for July 25 and Augsut 1, 2017 Teleconferences
ML17081A3802017-03-21021 March 2017
E-mail - Multi-Licensee License Amendment Request Example
ML17157B2272017-02-13013 February 2017
E-mail Follow-up Action from the November 1, 2016 Presubmittal Meeting on TSTF-564, Safety Limit MCPR
ML16298A0072016-10-21021 October 2016
Draft Traveler TSTF-564, Revision 0, Safety Limit MCPR, for November 1 Presubmittal Meeting
ML16054A7092016-02-11011 February 2016
E-mail Regarding Industry Response to NRC Comments on TSTF Draft Letter Regarding TSTF-425, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF Initiative 5b.
ML14328A4142014-11-14014 November 2014
E-mail Transmitting Handouts from 11/13/14 Tstf/Nrc Meeting
ML14310A3402014-11-0606 November 2014
E-mail Transmitting TSTF-547 Comments
ML1125900822011-09-0808 September 2011
E-mail Markup for TSTF-490, Revision 1, Deletion of E Bar Definition and Revision to RCS Specific Activity Tech Specific.
ML15034A1492011-04-21021 April 2011
E-mail Transmitting TSTF Handouts from 04/10/2014 Meeting
ML1101400462011-01-14014 January 2011
E-mail of Industry Presentation from January 12, 2011, Meeting
ML1101400092011-01-12012 January 2011
E-mail from Brian Mann Providing TSTF-505 Proposed Approach Materials
ML1033702182010-12-0202 December 2010
TSTF 432 Revision 1 Missing Page E-mail
ML0921205762009-07-21021 July 2009
E-mail Comments to 7/20/09 Letter on TSTF Traveler-400
2023-07-25
[Table view] |
Text
From: RICK MAURER To: Klein, Paul
Subject:
[External_Sender] Minor Comment on TSTF-577 Draft SE Date: Thursday, April 01, 2021 10:03:03 AM
- Paul, The draft safety evaluation for TSTF-577 was posted to ADAMS yesterday along with the cover letter to the Task Force. I understand that the NRC is not soliciting comments from the public on the SE but I had one minor comment which you may wish to consider.
In section 3.1 under Alloy 690TT SG Tubing is the following statement:
The NRC staff notes that the 96 EFPM between inspections is the maximum permissible time between inspections and, as such, is only applicable if the unit-specific OA justifies the interval.
In section 3.1 under Detection of Cracking is the following statement:
the NRC staff concludes that a conditional extension to the time to the next inspection is also acceptable. Therefore, following detection of crack indications, the NRC staff concludes that it is acceptable to perform the next inspection at the second refueling outage (for Alloy 600TT only), if the enhanced probe inspection method was performed.
Although it is understood among those knowledgeable in the area of steam generator tube integrity that the Operational Assessment must also justify skipping the inspection at the next refueling outage, it is not explicitly stated. I would suggest that similar wording as used in the 690TT section be added; that is: is only applicable if the unit-specific OA justifies the interval.
- Regards, Rick