|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:UNITEDSTATESOFAlvKRICANUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMSSIONIntheMatterofRochesterGasandElectricCorporation(R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant))))DocketNo.50-244)APPLICATIONFORAMENDMENTTPERATINLIENKPursuanttoSection50.90oftheregulationsoftheU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommission(NRC),RochesterGasandElectricCorporation(RGB),holderofFacilityOperatingLicenseNo.DPR-18,herebyr'equeststhattheTechnicalSpecificationssetforthinAppendixAtothatlicense,beamended.ThisrequestforchangeistoincorporatereferencetothemethodologyfordeterminingLowTemperatureOverpressureProtection(LTOP)limitsintotheAdministrativeControlssectionfortheReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperatureLimitsReport(PTLR).Adescriptionoftheamendmentrequest,necessarybackgroundinformation,justificationoftherequestedchanges,andnosignificanthazardsandenvironmentalconsiderationsareprovidedinAttachmentI.Thisevaluationdemonstratesthattheproposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificantchangeinthetypesorasignificantincreaseintheamountsofeffluentsoranychangeintheauthorizedpowerlevelofthefacility.Theproposedchangesalsodonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsideration.9b02i303b8960209PDRADQCK05000244PPOR AmarkedupcopyoftheGinnaStationTechnicalSpecificationswhichshowtherequestedchangesissetforthinAttachmentII.TheproposedrevisedtechnicalspecificationsareprovidedinAttachmentIII.AnevaluationoftheLTOPlimitsusingtheproposedmethodologyisprovidedinAttachmentIV.WHEREFORE,ApplicantrespectfullyrequeststhatFacilityOperatingLicenseNo.DPR-18,andAttachmentAtothatlicense,beamendedintheformattachedheretoasAttachmentIII.RochesterGasandElectricCorporationByRobertC.MecreVicePresidentNuclearOperationsSubscribedandsworntobeforemeonthis9thdayofFebruary1996.NotaryPuicJOANNES.GORMANNotaryPublicintheStateofNewYorkOrleansCountyCommissionExpiresNov.19 I(I1V~)PnFT':ilVv'i'(kA',ifld AttachmentIR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlantLicenseAmendmentRequestMethodologyforLowTemperatureOverpressureProtection(LTOP)LimitsThisattachmentprovidesadescriptionofthelicenseamendmentrequest(LAR)andthenecessaryjustificationstosupportincorporationofthemethodologyfordeterminingLTOPlimitsintotheAdministrativeControlssectionfortheReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperatureLimitsReport(PTLR).Thisattachmentisdividedintosixsectionsasfollows.SectionAsummarizesallchangestotheGinnaStationTechnicalSpecificationswhileSectionBprovidesthebackgroundandhistoryassociatedwiththechangesbeingrequested.SectionCprovidesthejustificationsassociatedwiththeseproposedchanges.AnosignificanthazardsconsiderationevaluationandenvironmentalconsiderationoftherequestedchangestotheGinnaStationTechnicalSpecificationsareprovidedinSectionsDandE,respectively.SectionFlistsallreferencesusedinthisattachment.A.DESCRIPTIONOFTECHNICALSPECIFICATIONCHANGESThisLARproposestorevisetheGinnaStationTechnicalSpecificationstoincorporatereferencetothemethodologyfordeterminingLTOPsetpoints.ThechangeissummarizedbelowandshowninAttachmentII.AdministrativeControls5.6.6ItemcwillberevisedtoreferencethemethodologyfordeterminingLTOPlimitsandtodeletereferencetoAmendmentNo.48withrespecttoLTOPlimits. | | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITEDSTATESOFAlvKRICANUCLEARREGULATORY COMMSSION IntheMatterofRochester GasandElectricCorporation (R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant))))DocketNo.50-244)APPLICATION FORAMENDMENT TPERATINLIENKPursuanttoSection50.90oftheregulations oftheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC),Rochester GasandElectricCorporation (RGB),holderofFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-18,herebyr'equests thattheTechnical Specifications setforthinAppendixAtothatlicense,beamended.Thisrequestforchangeistoincorporate reference tothemethodology fordetermining LowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)limitsintotheAdministrative ControlssectionfortheReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR).Adescription oftheamendment request,necessary background information, justification oftherequested changes,andnosignificant hazardsandenvironmental considerations areprovidedinAttachment I.Thisevaluation demonstrates thattheproposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificant changeinthetypesorasignificant increaseintheamountsofeffluents oranychangeintheauthorized powerlevelofthefacility. |
| B.BACKGROUNDDuringtheconversiontoimprovedstandardtechnicalspecificationsforGinnaStation,RGBhadproposedtorelocatetheLTOPandRCStemperatureandpressurelimitstothePTLR(Ref.1).AssociatedwiththischangewastheadditionofareferencetotheAdministrativeControlssectionoftechnicalspecificationsrelatedtothePTLRdocumentingthemethodologyusedforallchangestotheselimits.However,theproposedmethodologywouldbe"new"withrespecttodeterminationofboththeLTOPandRCStemperatureandpressurelimitsatGinnaStation.Duetotimeconstraints,RGBinformedtheNRCthatuseofthisnewmethodologywouldbeburdensomeandinstead,RG&Ewishedtoretaintheexistingvalues.TheNRCagreedwiththisconcernandallowedtheexistinglimitstoberelocatedtothePTLRbutrequiredchangestotheselimitstobereviewedandapprovedbytheNRCasdocumentedinReference2.However,thedeterminationthatGinnaStationneededtoretaintheexistingvalueswaswithrespecttotheRCSpressureandtemperaturelimitsthatareincludedinthePTLRandnottheLTOPlimits.Assuch,thisLARrequeststhattheLTOPmethodologybereviewedandapprovedbytheNRCstafFsuchthatitcanbereferencedwithintheAdministrativeControlssectionofthetechnicalspecifications.AnychangestotheRCSpressureandtemperaturelimitsincludedinthePTLRwillstillrequireNRCreviewandapproval.ItshouldbenotedthattheLTOPmethodologybeingproposedbyRGEcEhadreceivedinitialNRCreviewsincethemethodologyprovidedinReference1incorporatesallcommentswhichRG@Ehadreceivedtodate.AttachmentIVcontainstheevaluationoftheLTOPlimitsatGinnaStationusingthisproposedmethodology.C.JUSTIFICATIONOFCHANGESThissectionprovidesthejustificationforallchangesdescribedinSectionAaboveandshowninAttachmentII.Thejustificationsareorganizedbasedonwhetherthechangeis:morerestrictive(M),lessrestrictive(L),administrative(A),ortherequirementisrelocated(R).Thejustificationslistedbelowarealsoreferencedinthetechnicalspecification(s)whichareaffected(seeAttachmentII). | | Theproposedchangesalsodonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration. |
| C.~dA.lAdministrativeControlsSection5.6.6.cisrevisedtostatethat"theanalyticalmethodsusedtodeterminetheLTOPlimitsshallbethosepreviouslyreviewedbytheNRC"versusthe"LTOPlimitsshallbethosepreviouslyreviewedandapprovedbytheNRCinAmendmentNo.48."ThischangeisadministrativeinnaturesincetheLTOPlimitswerepreviouslyrelocatedfromtechnicalspecificationstothePTLR.TheonlychangebeingrequestedisthatallfuturechangestotheseLTOPlimitsmustbeperformedinaccordancewithNRCapprovedmethodologyinsteadofrequiringalicenseamendment.ThechangeisalsoconsistentwithNUREG-1431.Therearenotanymorerestrictive(M),lessrestrictive(L),orrelocated(R)changesassociatedwiththisLAR.D.SIGNIFICANT~ARDSCONSIDERATIONEVALUATION,TheproposedchangestotheGinnaStationTechnicalSpecificationsasidentifiedinSectionAandjustifiedinSectionChavebeenevaluatedwithrespectto10CFR50.92(c)andshowntonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsiderationasdescribedbelow.ThissectionisorganizedbasedonSectionCabove.D.lEvalitinfAmini.rivehanesTheadministrativechangesdiscussedinSection8.3donotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsiderationasdiscussedbelow:OperationofGinnaStationinaccordancewiththeproposedchangesdoesnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.TheproposedchangesonlyrequirethatfutureLTOPlimitsbedevelopedusingNRCapprovedmethodologyasspecifiedwithintheAdministrativeControlssectionanddonotinvolveanytechnicalchanges.Assuch,thesechangesareadministrativeinnatureanddonotimpactinitiatorsoranalyzedeventsorassumedmitigationofaccidentortransientevents.Therefore,thesechangesdonotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyanalyzed. | | 9b02i303b8 960209PDRADQCK05000244PPOR AmarkedupcopyoftheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications whichshowtherequested changesissetforthinAttachment II.Theproposedrevisedtechnical specifications areprovidedinAttachment III.Anevaluation oftheLTOPlimitsusingtheproposedmethodology isprovidedinAttachment IV.WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requeststhatFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-18,andAttachment Atothatlicense,beamendedintheformattachedheretoasAttachment III.Rochester GasandElectricCorporation ByRobertC.MecreVicePresident NuclearOperations Subscribed andsworntobeforemeonthis9thdayofFebruary1996.NotaryPuicJOANNES.GORMANNotaryPublicintheStateofNewYorkOrleansCountyCommission ExpiresNov.19 I(I1V~)PnFT':ilVv'i'(kA',ifld Attachment IR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlantLicenseAmendment RequestMethodology forLowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)LimitsThisattachment providesadescription ofthelicenseamendment request(LAR)andthenecessary justifications tosupportincorporation ofthemethodology fordetermining LTOPlimitsintotheAdministrative ControlssectionfortheReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR).Thisattachment isdividedintosixsectionsasfollows.SectionAsummarizes allchangestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications whileSectionBprovidesthebackground andhistoryassociated withthechangesbeingrequested. |
| ~$~Il~IOperationofGinnaStationinaccordancewiththeproposedchangesdoesnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedchangesdonotinvolveaphysicalalterationoftheplant(i.e.,nonewordifferenttypeofequipmentwillbeinstalled)orchangesinthemethodsgoverningnormalplantoperation.Theproposedchangeswillnotimposeanynewordifferentrequirements.Thus,thischangedoesnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccident.previouslyevaluated.OperationofGinnaStationinaccordancewiththeproposedchangesdoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.TheproposedchangeswillnotreduceamarginofplantsafetybecausethechangesdonotimpactanysafetyanalysisassumptionsotherthanrequiringfutureevaluationsofLTOPlimitstobeperformedinaccordancewithNRCapprovedmethodology.Thesechangesareadministrativeinnature.Assuch,noquestionofsafetyisinvolved,andthechangedoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Basedupontheaboveinformation,ithasbeendeterminedthattheproposedadministrativechangestotheGinnaStationTechnicalSpecificationsdonotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,doesnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentpreviouslyevaluated,anddoesnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Therefore,itisconcludedthattheproposedchangesmeettherequirementsof10CFR50.92(c)anddonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsideration.E.ENVIRONMENTALCONSIDERATIONRGBhasevaluatedtheproposedchangesanddeterminedthat:ThechangesdonotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsiderationasdocumentedinSectionDabove;Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificantchangeinthetypesorsignificantincreaseintheamountsofanyeffluentsthatmaybereleasedoffsitesincenospecificationsrelatedtooffsitereleasesareaffected;andThechangesdonotinvolveasignificantincreaseinindividualorcumulativeoccupationalradiationexposuresincenonewordifferenttypeofequipmentarerequiredtobeinstalledasaresultofthisLARAccordingly,theproposedchangesmeettheeligibilitycriteriaforcategoricalexclusionsetforthin10CFR51.22(c)(9).Therefore,pursuantto10CFR51.22(b),anenvironmentalassessmentoftheproposedchangesisnotrequired.4 F.REFERENCESLetterfromR.RMecredy,RG&;E,toA.A.Johnson,NRC, | | SectionCprovidesthejustifications associated withtheseproposedchanges.Anosignificant hazardsconsideration evaluation andenvironmental consideration oftherequested changestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications areprovidedinSectionsDandE,respectively. |
| | SectionFlistsallreferences usedinthisattachment. |
| | A.DESCRIPTION OFTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGESThisLARproposestorevisetheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications toincorporate reference tothemethodology fordetermining LTOPsetpoints. |
| | Thechangeissummarized belowandshowninAttachment II.Administrative Controls5.6.6Itemcwillberevisedtoreference themethodology fordetermining LTOPlimitsandtodeletereference toAmendment No.48withrespecttoLTOPlimits. |
| | B.BACKGROUND Duringtheconversion toimprovedstandardtechnical specifications forGinnaStation,RGBhadproposedtorelocatetheLTOPandRCStemperature andpressurelimitstothePTLR(Ref.1).Associated withthischangewastheadditionofareference totheAdministrative Controlssectionoftechnical specifications relatedtothePTLRdocumenting themethodology usedforallchangestotheselimits.However,theproposedmethodology wouldbe"new"withrespecttodetermination ofboththeLTOPandRCStemperature andpressurelimitsatGinnaStation.Duetotimeconstraints, RGBinformedtheNRCthatuseofthisnewmethodology wouldbeburdensome andinstead,RG&Ewishedtoretaintheexistingvalues.TheNRCagreedwiththisconcernandallowedtheexistinglimitstoberelocated tothePTLRbutrequiredchangestotheselimitstobereviewedandapprovedbytheNRCasdocumented inReference 2.However,thedetermination thatGinnaStationneededtoretaintheexistingvalueswaswithrespecttotheRCSpressureandtemperature limitsthatareincludedinthePTLRandnottheLTOPlimits.Assuch,thisLARrequeststhattheLTOPmethodology bereviewedandapprovedbytheNRCstafFsuchthatitcanbereferenced withintheAdministrative Controlssectionofthetechnical specifications. |
| | AnychangestotheRCSpressureandtemperature limitsincludedinthePTLRwillstillrequireNRCreviewandapproval. |
| | ItshouldbenotedthattheLTOPmethodology beingproposedbyRGEcEhadreceivedinitialNRCreviewsincethemethodology providedinReference 1incorporates allcommentswhichRG@Ehadreceivedtodate.Attachment IVcontainstheevaluation oftheLTOPlimitsatGinnaStationusingthisproposedmethodology. |
| | C.JUSTIFICATION OFCHANGESThissectionprovidesthejustification forallchangesdescribed inSectionAaboveandshowninAttachment II.Thejustifications areorganized basedonwhetherthechangeis:morerestrictive (M),lessrestrictive (L),administrative (A),ortherequirement isrelocated (R).Thejustifications listedbelowarealsoreferenced inthetechnical specification(s) whichareaffected(seeAttachment II). |
| | C.~dA.lAdministrative ControlsSection5.6.6.cisrevisedtostatethat"theanalytical methodsusedtodetermine theLTOPlimitsshallbethosepreviously reviewedbytheNRC"versusthe"LTOPlimitsshallbethosepreviously reviewedandapprovedbytheNRCinAmendment No.48."Thischangeisadministrative innaturesincetheLTOPlimitswerepreviously relocated fromtechnical specifications tothePTLR.Theonlychangebeingrequested isthatallfuturechangestotheseLTOPlimitsmustbeperformed inaccordance withNRCapprovedmethodology insteadofrequiring alicenseamendment. |
| | Thechangeisalsoconsistent withNUREG-1431. |
| | Therearenotanymorerestrictive (M),lessrestrictive (L),orrelocated (R)changesassociated withthisLAR.D.SIGNIFICANT |
| | ~ARDSCONSIDERATION EVALUATION, TheproposedchangestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications asidentified inSectionAandjustified inSectionChavebeenevaluated withrespectto10CFR50.92(c)andshowntonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdescribed below.Thissectionisorganized basedonSectionCabove.D.lEvalitinfAmini.rivehanesTheadministrative changesdiscussed inSection8.3donotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdiscussed below:Operation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated. |
| | TheproposedchangesonlyrequirethatfutureLTOPlimitsbedeveloped usingNRCapprovedmethodology asspecified withintheAdministrative Controlssectionanddonotinvolveanytechnical changes.Assuch,thesechangesareadministrative innatureanddonotimpactinitiators oranalyzedeventsorassumedmitigation ofaccidentortransient events.Therefore, thesechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzed. |
| | ~$~Il~IOperation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. |
| | Theproposedchangesdonotinvolveaphysicalalteration oftheplant(i.e.,nonewordifferent typeofequipment willbeinstalled) orchangesinthemethodsgoverning normalplantoperation. |
| | Theproposedchangeswillnotimposeanynewordifferent requirements. |
| | Thus,thischangedoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccident. |
| | previously evaluated. |
| | Operation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Theproposedchangeswillnotreduceamarginofplantsafetybecausethechangesdonotimpactanysafetyanalysisassumptions otherthanrequiring futureevaluations ofLTOPlimitstobeperformed inaccordance withNRCapprovedmethodology. |
| | Thesechangesareadministrative innature.Assuch,noquestionofsafetyisinvolved, andthechangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedupontheaboveinformation, ithasbeendetermined thattheproposedadministrative changestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications donotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, doesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentpreviously evaluated, anddoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Therefore, itisconcluded thattheproposedchangesmeettherequirements of10CFR50.92(c)anddonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration. |
| | E.ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION RGBhasevaluated theproposedchangesanddetermined that:Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdocumented inSectionDabove;Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificant changeinthetypesorsignificant increaseintheamountsofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsitesincenospecifications relatedtooffsitereleasesareaffected; andThechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposuresincenonewordifferent typeofequipment arerequiredtobeinstalled asaresultofthisLARAccordingly, theproposedchangesmeettheeligibility criteriaforcategorical exclusion setforthin10CFR51.22(c)(9). |
| | Therefore, pursuantto10CFR51.22(b), |
| | anenvironmental assessment oftheproposedchangesisnotrequired. |
| | 4 F.REFERENCES LetterfromR.RMecredy,RG&;E,toA.A.Johnson,NRC, |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| TechnicalSpecijicationsImprovementProgram,ReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperatureLimitsReport(PTLR),datedDecember8,1995.LetterfromL.B.Marsh,NRC,toR.R.Mecredy,RG&;E,RL.Ginna-AcceptanceforReferencingofPressureTemperalmeLimitsReport(TAC¹M92320),datedDecember26,1995.-5-}}
| | Technical Specijications Improvement Program,ReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR),datedDecember8,1995.LetterfromL.B.Marsh,NRC,toR.R.Mecredy,RG&;E,RL.Ginna-Acceptance forReferencing ofPressureTemperalm eLimitsReport(TAC¹M92320),datedDecember26,1995.-5-}} |
Similar Documents at Ginna |
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARML17265A6921999-06-28028 June 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Revise ITS Associated with RCS Leakage Detection Instrumentation.Lar Proposed as Result of Commitment That Rg&E Submit as Part of Staff Review of Application of leak-before-break Status ML17265A5691999-03-0101 March 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Change in ITS to Revise Battery Cell Parameters Limit for Specific Gravity (SR 3.8.6.3 & SR 3.8.6.6) ML17265A4651998-11-24024 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Improved Tech Spec Description of Fuel Cladding Matl (TS 4.2.1) & Updating References Provided in TS 5.6.5 for COLR ML17265A2431998-04-27027 April 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements Associated W/Sfp to Reflect Planned Mod to Storage Racks & Temporarily Addressing Boraflex Degradation within Pool ML17264B0431997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Administrative Controls W/Respect to RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264B0381997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Re Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint for High Steam Flow Input Into LCO Table 3.3.2-1,Function 4d (Main Steam Isolation) to Address Issues Identified in Revised Setpoint Analysis ML17264B0021997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,allowing Testing of Certain ECCS motor-operated Valves in Mode 4 Which Currently Requires Entry in LCO 3.0.3 ML17264A9981997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Specified Accumulator Borated Water Volume Values in SR 3.5.1.2 to Match Associated Accumulator Percent Level Values ML17264A8661997-04-24024 April 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCP PT & Administrative Control Requirements ML17264A8471997-03-31031 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Spent Fuel Pool Storage Requirements ML20134D9911996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,requesting Change to Mode of Applicability for Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Actuation on Main Feedwater Pump ML17264A7121996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Requesting Change to Required Actions for Inoperable Channels Associated with Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML17264A5991996-09-13013 September 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264A4701996-05-0808 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Typos ML17264A4041996-03-15015 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Methodology for Determining RCS P/T Limits & LTOP Limits in Administrative Controls Section of RCS P/T Limits Rept ML17264A3441996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Table 3.3.2-1,Function 5b, Feedwater Isolation,Sg Water Level - High to Raise Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint ML17264A3381996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Ref to Methodology for Determining LTOP Limits Into Administrative Controls Section for RCS PT Limits Rept ML17264A3331996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements for Containment Closure During Mode 6 to Allow Use of Installed Overhead Door Assembly to Isolate Equipment Hatch Opening ML17264A3221996-01-26026 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,incorporating Changes Necessary to Reflect Revised Nuclear Fuel Loading ML17264A2521995-11-27027 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML17264A2551995-11-20020 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,submitting Changes to TS Instrumentation Requirements & Conversion to Improved TS ML17264A1501995-08-31031 August 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Ts,By Implementing WCAP-10271,its Assoc Suppls & Other Re Changes W/Respect to RTS & ESFAS ML17263B0671995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TSs in Entirety to Convert to Improved TSs ML17263A9771995-03-13013 March 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Revise TS 4.4.2.4.a to Replace Specific Leakage Testing Frequencies for Containment Isolation Valves ML17309A5501994-07-15015 July 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing TS 3.5, Providing NRC W/Opportunity to Communicate at Early Stage Any Concerns W/Respect to Differences from NUREG-1431 ML17263A7141994-06-24024 June 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,re Upgrading of Administrative Controls Section 6 ML17263A7071994-06-15015 June 1994 Notarized Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Re Reactor Coolant Activity ML17263A6551994-05-23023 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,increasing Allowable Reactor Coolant Activity Levels to Improved TS (NUREG-1431) ML17263A6411994-05-13013 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Administrative Controls Section 6.0 Consistent W/Improved TS ML17263A3181993-07-13013 July 1993 Application for Amend to License Revisions for License DPR-18 Re Removing Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 from TS ML17263A2081993-04-0505 April 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 & Maintain Required Listing in Updated FSAR ML17262B1171992-12-17017 December 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-19,revising TS Sections 3.2 & 3.3 to Eliminate Use of High Concentration Boric Acid as safety-related Source of SI Pumps & Increasing Allowable Outage Times ML17262B0991992-11-30030 November 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Table of Containment Isolation Valves & Provide Ref in Bases to UFSAR ML17262B0571992-10-0808 October 1992 Corrected Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Consisting of Notarized Page Two ML17262B0431992-10-0808 October 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Per Guidance Provided in GL 91-11 Re Resolution of GI 48 ML17262B0201992-09-15015 September 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Sections 3.1.1.4,3.1.1.6,4.3.4 & Adding site-specific Basis Sections to Address GL 90-06 Re Resolution of Generic Issues 70 & 94 ML17262A9121992-06-22022 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 4.3.1 Per Guidance Provided in Generic Ltr 91-01, Removal of Schedule for Withdrawal of Reactor Vessel Matl Specimens from Ts. ML17262A8311992-04-23023 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing TSs to Redefine Snubber Visual Insp Schedule,Per Generic Ltr 90-09 Guidance ML17262A8211992-04-21021 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,instituting Std License Condition for Fire Protection Program & Removing Requirements for Fire Protection Sys from Tss,Per Guidance in Generic Ltrs 86-10 & 88-12 ML17262A7861992-03-23023 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Section 6.5.1, Plant Operations Review Committee Function. ML17262A7801992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 5.1 Figure 5.1-1 to Describe Rather than Depict Site Area Boundary to Evaluate Radiological Releases to Unrestricted Area ML17262A7901992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs 6.9.1.2 & 6.9.2.5 ML17262A6321991-10-25025 October 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Delete TS 5.1 & Figure 5.1-1 ML17262A5331991-06-20020 June 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Incorporate Changes to Specifications & Action Statements for Offsite & Onsite Power Sources Available for Operation of Plant Auxiliaries ML17262A4121991-03-0808 March 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,removing Table 3.6-1 Re Containment Isolation Valves from Tech Specs ML17262A3831991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs to Modify Method of Locking Open Motor Operated Valve 856, Refueling Water Storage Tank Delivery Valve When Reactor Coolant Sys at or Above 350 F ML17262A3751991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Heatup/Cooldown Curves & Associated Low Temp Overpressure Protection Setpoint to Implement Reg Guide 1.99,Rev 2 Methodology ML17262A3721991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,providing Clarification of Which QA Activities Subj to Audit Considerations & Changing Audit Frequency Described in Tech Spec 6.5.2.8d ML17262A3871991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Tables 3.5-5 & 4.1-5 Based on Mods to Radiation Monitoring Sys ML17262A2951991-01-14014 January 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing Tech Specs to Limit Containment Internal Pressure to 1 Psig Vs 6 Psig Per Initial Condition Assumptions in Containment Integrity Analysis 1999-06-28
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARML17265A6921999-06-28028 June 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Revise ITS Associated with RCS Leakage Detection Instrumentation.Lar Proposed as Result of Commitment That Rg&E Submit as Part of Staff Review of Application of leak-before-break Status ML17265A5691999-03-0101 March 1999 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Change in ITS to Revise Battery Cell Parameters Limit for Specific Gravity (SR 3.8.6.3 & SR 3.8.6.6) ML17265A4651998-11-24024 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Improved Tech Spec Description of Fuel Cladding Matl (TS 4.2.1) & Updating References Provided in TS 5.6.5 for COLR ML17265A2431998-04-27027 April 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements Associated W/Sfp to Reflect Planned Mod to Storage Racks & Temporarily Addressing Boraflex Degradation within Pool ML17264B0431997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Administrative Controls W/Respect to RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264B0381997-09-29029 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Re Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint for High Steam Flow Input Into LCO Table 3.3.2-1,Function 4d (Main Steam Isolation) to Address Issues Identified in Revised Setpoint Analysis ML17264B0021997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,allowing Testing of Certain ECCS motor-operated Valves in Mode 4 Which Currently Requires Entry in LCO 3.0.3 ML17264A9981997-08-19019 August 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Specified Accumulator Borated Water Volume Values in SR 3.5.1.2 to Match Associated Accumulator Percent Level Values ML17264A8661997-04-24024 April 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCP PT & Administrative Control Requirements ML17264A8471997-03-31031 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Spent Fuel Pool Storage Requirements ML20134D9911996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,requesting Change to Mode of Applicability for Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Actuation on Main Feedwater Pump ML17264A7121996-10-29029 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Requesting Change to Required Actions for Inoperable Channels Associated with Auxiliary Feedwater Pump ML17264A5991996-09-13013 September 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising RCS Pressure & Temp Limits Rept ML17264A4701996-05-0808 May 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,correcting Typos ML17264A4041996-03-15015 March 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Methodology for Determining RCS P/T Limits & LTOP Limits in Administrative Controls Section of RCS P/T Limits Rept ML17264A3441996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Table 3.3.2-1,Function 5b, Feedwater Isolation,Sg Water Level - High to Raise Allowable Value & Trip Setpoint ML17264A3381996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Incorporate Ref to Methodology for Determining LTOP Limits Into Administrative Controls Section for RCS PT Limits Rept ML17264A3331996-02-0909 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Requirements for Containment Closure During Mode 6 to Allow Use of Installed Overhead Door Assembly to Isolate Equipment Hatch Opening ML17264A3221996-01-26026 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,incorporating Changes Necessary to Reflect Revised Nuclear Fuel Loading ML17264A2521995-11-27027 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B ML17264A2551995-11-20020 November 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,submitting Changes to TS Instrumentation Requirements & Conversion to Improved TS ML17264A1501995-08-31031 August 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing Ts,By Implementing WCAP-10271,its Assoc Suppls & Other Re Changes W/Respect to RTS & ESFAS ML17263B0671995-05-26026 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TSs in Entirety to Convert to Improved TSs ML17263A9771995-03-13013 March 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Revise TS 4.4.2.4.a to Replace Specific Leakage Testing Frequencies for Containment Isolation Valves ML17309A5501994-07-15015 July 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,proposing TS 3.5, Providing NRC W/Opportunity to Communicate at Early Stage Any Concerns W/Respect to Differences from NUREG-1431 ML17263A7141994-06-24024 June 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,re Upgrading of Administrative Controls Section 6 ML17263A7071994-06-15015 June 1994 Notarized Application for Amend to License DPR-18 Re Reactor Coolant Activity ML17263A6551994-05-23023 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,increasing Allowable Reactor Coolant Activity Levels to Improved TS (NUREG-1431) ML17263A6411994-05-13013 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Administrative Controls Section 6.0 Consistent W/Improved TS ML17263A3181993-07-13013 July 1993 Application for Amend to License Revisions for License DPR-18 Re Removing Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 from TS ML17263A2081993-04-0505 April 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Containment Isolation Valve Table 3.6-1 & Maintain Required Listing in Updated FSAR ML17262B1171992-12-17017 December 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-19,revising TS Sections 3.2 & 3.3 to Eliminate Use of High Concentration Boric Acid as safety-related Source of SI Pumps & Increasing Allowable Outage Times ML17262B0991992-11-30030 November 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS to Remove Table of Containment Isolation Valves & Provide Ref in Bases to UFSAR ML17262B0571992-10-0808 October 1992 Corrected Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Consisting of Notarized Page Two ML17262B0431992-10-0808 October 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,adding Addl Requirements to Auxiliary Electrical Sys TS & Action Statements for Instrument Bus Sys,Per Guidance Provided in GL 91-11 Re Resolution of GI 48 ML17262B0201992-09-15015 September 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS Sections 3.1.1.4,3.1.1.6,4.3.4 & Adding site-specific Basis Sections to Address GL 90-06 Re Resolution of Generic Issues 70 & 94 ML17262A9121992-06-22022 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 4.3.1 Per Guidance Provided in Generic Ltr 91-01, Removal of Schedule for Withdrawal of Reactor Vessel Matl Specimens from Ts. ML17262A8311992-04-23023 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing TSs to Redefine Snubber Visual Insp Schedule,Per Generic Ltr 90-09 Guidance ML17262A8211992-04-21021 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,instituting Std License Condition for Fire Protection Program & Removing Requirements for Fire Protection Sys from Tss,Per Guidance in Generic Ltrs 86-10 & 88-12 ML17262A7861992-03-23023 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Section 6.5.1, Plant Operations Review Committee Function. ML17262A7801992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising TS 5.1 Figure 5.1-1 to Describe Rather than Depict Site Area Boundary to Evaluate Radiological Releases to Unrestricted Area ML17262A7901992-03-20020 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs 6.9.1.2 & 6.9.2.5 ML17262A6321991-10-25025 October 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18 to Delete TS 5.1 & Figure 5.1-1 ML17262A5331991-06-20020 June 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,to Incorporate Changes to Specifications & Action Statements for Offsite & Onsite Power Sources Available for Operation of Plant Auxiliaries ML17262A4121991-03-0808 March 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,removing Table 3.6-1 Re Containment Isolation Valves from Tech Specs ML17262A3831991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Specs to Modify Method of Locking Open Motor Operated Valve 856, Refueling Water Storage Tank Delivery Valve When Reactor Coolant Sys at or Above 350 F ML17262A3751991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Heatup/Cooldown Curves & Associated Low Temp Overpressure Protection Setpoint to Implement Reg Guide 1.99,Rev 2 Methodology ML17262A3721991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,providing Clarification of Which QA Activities Subj to Audit Considerations & Changing Audit Frequency Described in Tech Spec 6.5.2.8d ML17262A3871991-02-15015 February 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,revising Tech Spec Tables 3.5-5 & 4.1-5 Based on Mods to Radiation Monitoring Sys ML17262A2951991-01-14014 January 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-18,changing Tech Specs to Limit Containment Internal Pressure to 1 Psig Vs 6 Psig Per Initial Condition Assumptions in Containment Integrity Analysis 1999-06-28
[Table view] |
Text
UNITEDSTATESOFAlvKRICANUCLEARREGULATORY COMMSSION IntheMatterofRochester GasandElectricCorporation (R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlant))))DocketNo.50-244)APPLICATION FORAMENDMENT TPERATINLIENKPursuanttoSection50.90oftheregulations oftheU.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC),Rochester GasandElectricCorporation (RGB),holderofFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-18,herebyr'equests thattheTechnical Specifications setforthinAppendixAtothatlicense,beamended.Thisrequestforchangeistoincorporate reference tothemethodology fordetermining LowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)limitsintotheAdministrative ControlssectionfortheReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR).Adescription oftheamendment request,necessary background information, justification oftherequested changes,andnosignificant hazardsandenvironmental considerations areprovidedinAttachment I.Thisevaluation demonstrates thattheproposedchangesdonotinvolveasignificant changeinthetypesorasignificant increaseintheamountsofeffluents oranychangeintheauthorized powerlevelofthefacility.
Theproposedchangesalsodonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
9b02i303b8 960209PDRADQCK05000244PPOR AmarkedupcopyoftheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications whichshowtherequested changesissetforthinAttachment II.Theproposedrevisedtechnical specifications areprovidedinAttachment III.Anevaluation oftheLTOPlimitsusingtheproposedmethodology isprovidedinAttachment IV.WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requeststhatFacilityOperating LicenseNo.DPR-18,andAttachment Atothatlicense,beamendedintheformattachedheretoasAttachment III.Rochester GasandElectricCorporation ByRobertC.MecreVicePresident NuclearOperations Subscribed andsworntobeforemeonthis9thdayofFebruary1996.NotaryPuicJOANNES.GORMANNotaryPublicintheStateofNewYorkOrleansCountyCommission ExpiresNov.19 I(I1V~)PnFT':ilVv'i'(kA',ifld Attachment IR.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlantLicenseAmendment RequestMethodology forLowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)LimitsThisattachment providesadescription ofthelicenseamendment request(LAR)andthenecessary justifications tosupportincorporation ofthemethodology fordetermining LTOPlimitsintotheAdministrative ControlssectionfortheReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR).Thisattachment isdividedintosixsectionsasfollows.SectionAsummarizes allchangestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications whileSectionBprovidesthebackground andhistoryassociated withthechangesbeingrequested.
SectionCprovidesthejustifications associated withtheseproposedchanges.Anosignificant hazardsconsideration evaluation andenvironmental consideration oftherequested changestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications areprovidedinSectionsDandE,respectively.
SectionFlistsallreferences usedinthisattachment.
A.DESCRIPTION OFTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGESThisLARproposestorevisetheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications toincorporate reference tothemethodology fordetermining LTOPsetpoints.
Thechangeissummarized belowandshowninAttachment II.Administrative Controls5.6.6Itemcwillberevisedtoreference themethodology fordetermining LTOPlimitsandtodeletereference toAmendment No.48withrespecttoLTOPlimits.
B.BACKGROUND Duringtheconversion toimprovedstandardtechnical specifications forGinnaStation,RGBhadproposedtorelocatetheLTOPandRCStemperature andpressurelimitstothePTLR(Ref.1).Associated withthischangewastheadditionofareference totheAdministrative Controlssectionoftechnical specifications relatedtothePTLRdocumenting themethodology usedforallchangestotheselimits.However,theproposedmethodology wouldbe"new"withrespecttodetermination ofboththeLTOPandRCStemperature andpressurelimitsatGinnaStation.Duetotimeconstraints, RGBinformedtheNRCthatuseofthisnewmethodology wouldbeburdensome andinstead,RG&Ewishedtoretaintheexistingvalues.TheNRCagreedwiththisconcernandallowedtheexistinglimitstoberelocated tothePTLRbutrequiredchangestotheselimitstobereviewedandapprovedbytheNRCasdocumented inReference 2.However,thedetermination thatGinnaStationneededtoretaintheexistingvalueswaswithrespecttotheRCSpressureandtemperature limitsthatareincludedinthePTLRandnottheLTOPlimits.Assuch,thisLARrequeststhattheLTOPmethodology bereviewedandapprovedbytheNRCstafFsuchthatitcanbereferenced withintheAdministrative Controlssectionofthetechnical specifications.
AnychangestotheRCSpressureandtemperature limitsincludedinthePTLRwillstillrequireNRCreviewandapproval.
ItshouldbenotedthattheLTOPmethodology beingproposedbyRGEcEhadreceivedinitialNRCreviewsincethemethodology providedinReference 1incorporates allcommentswhichRG@Ehadreceivedtodate.Attachment IVcontainstheevaluation oftheLTOPlimitsatGinnaStationusingthisproposedmethodology.
C.JUSTIFICATION OFCHANGESThissectionprovidesthejustification forallchangesdescribed inSectionAaboveandshowninAttachment II.Thejustifications areorganized basedonwhetherthechangeis:morerestrictive (M),lessrestrictive (L),administrative (A),ortherequirement isrelocated (R).Thejustifications listedbelowarealsoreferenced inthetechnical specification(s) whichareaffected(seeAttachment II).
C.~dA.lAdministrative ControlsSection5.6.6.cisrevisedtostatethat"theanalytical methodsusedtodetermine theLTOPlimitsshallbethosepreviously reviewedbytheNRC"versusthe"LTOPlimitsshallbethosepreviously reviewedandapprovedbytheNRCinAmendment No.48."Thischangeisadministrative innaturesincetheLTOPlimitswerepreviously relocated fromtechnical specifications tothePTLR.Theonlychangebeingrequested isthatallfuturechangestotheseLTOPlimitsmustbeperformed inaccordance withNRCapprovedmethodology insteadofrequiring alicenseamendment.
Thechangeisalsoconsistent withNUREG-1431.
Therearenotanymorerestrictive (M),lessrestrictive (L),orrelocated (R)changesassociated withthisLAR.D.SIGNIFICANT
~ARDSCONSIDERATION EVALUATION, TheproposedchangestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications asidentified inSectionAandjustified inSectionChavebeenevaluated withrespectto10CFR50.92(c)andshowntonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdescribed below.Thissectionisorganized basedonSectionCabove.D.lEvalitinfAmini.rivehanesTheadministrative changesdiscussed inSection8.3donotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdiscussed below:Operation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
TheproposedchangesonlyrequirethatfutureLTOPlimitsbedeveloped usingNRCapprovedmethodology asspecified withintheAdministrative Controlssectionanddonotinvolveanytechnical changes.Assuch,thesechangesareadministrative innatureanddonotimpactinitiators oranalyzedeventsorassumedmitigation ofaccidentortransient events.Therefore, thesechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously analyzed.
~$~Il~IOperation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Theproposedchangesdonotinvolveaphysicalalteration oftheplant(i.e.,nonewordifferent typeofequipment willbeinstalled) orchangesinthemethodsgoverning normalplantoperation.
Theproposedchangeswillnotimposeanynewordifferent requirements.
Thus,thischangedoesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccident.
previously evaluated.
Operation ofGinnaStationinaccordance withtheproposedchangesdoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Theproposedchangeswillnotreduceamarginofplantsafetybecausethechangesdonotimpactanysafetyanalysisassumptions otherthanrequiring futureevaluations ofLTOPlimitstobeperformed inaccordance withNRCapprovedmethodology.
Thesechangesareadministrative innature.Assuch,noquestionofsafetyisinvolved, andthechangedoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedupontheaboveinformation, ithasbeendetermined thattheproposedadministrative changestotheGinnaStationTechnical Specifications donotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated, doesnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentpreviously evaluated, anddoesnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Therefore, itisconcluded thattheproposedchangesmeettherequirements of10CFR50.92(c)anddonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration.
E.ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION RGBhasevaluated theproposedchangesanddetermined that:Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration asdocumented inSectionDabove;Thechangesdonotinvolveasignificant changeinthetypesorsignificant increaseintheamountsofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsitesincenospecifications relatedtooffsitereleasesareaffected; andThechangesdonotinvolveasignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposuresincenonewordifferent typeofequipment arerequiredtobeinstalled asaresultofthisLARAccordingly, theproposedchangesmeettheeligibility criteriaforcategorical exclusion setforthin10CFR51.22(c)(9).
Therefore, pursuantto10CFR51.22(b),
anenvironmental assessment oftheproposedchangesisnotrequired.
4 F.REFERENCES LetterfromR.RMecredy,RG&;E,toA.A.Johnson,NRC,
Subject:
Technical Specijications Improvement Program,ReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)PressureandTemperature LimitsReport(PTLR),datedDecember8,1995.LetterfromL.B.Marsh,NRC,toR.R.Mecredy,RG&;E,RL.Ginna-Acceptance forReferencing ofPressureTemperalm eLimitsReport(TAC¹M92320),datedDecember26,1995.-5-