ML17264A404
| ML17264A404 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 03/15/1996 |
| From: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17264A403 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9603210235 | |
| Download: ML17264A404 (9) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEARREGULATORYCOMMISSION In the Matter of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant)
)
)
)
Docket No. 50-244
)
APPLICATIONFOR AMENDMENT T
PERATIN LI EN E Pursuant to Section 50.90 of the regulations of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation (RGB), holder ofFacility Operating License No.
DPR-18, hereby requests that the Technical Specifications set forth in Appendix Ato that license, be amended.
This request for change is to incorporate reference to the methodology for determining Reactor Coolant System (RCS)
Pressure Temperature (P/T) limits and Low Temperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP) limits into the Administrative Controls section for the RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR).
A description ofthe amendment request, necessary background information, justification of the requested
- changes, and no significant hazards and environmental considerations are provided I
in Attachment I.
This evaluation demonstrates that the proposed changes do not involve a significant change in the types or a significant increase in the amounts ofeffluents or any change in the authorized power level ofthe facility. The proposed changes also do not involve a significant hazards consideration.
9603210235 960315 PDR ADQCK 05000244 P
.PDR
I' Amarked up copy ofthe Ginna Station Technical Specifications which show the requested changes is set forth in Attachment II. The proposed revised technical specifications are provided in Attachment III.
WHEREFORE, Applicant respectfully requests that Facility Operating License No. DPR-18, and Attachment Ato that license, be amended in the form attached hereto as Attachment III.
Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation By Robert C. Mecredy Vice President Nuclear Operations Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 15th day ofMarch 1996.
No ary Public LORETTA MARSHALLPARKER Nosy Public m thestate of New Yotft MONROE COUNTY Cotnnxseen Expires Dec. 12, ife.p.
Attachment I, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant License Amendment Request Implementation of Generic Letter 96-03 This attachment provides a description ofthe license amendment request (LAR) and the necessary justifications to support incorporation ofthe methodology for determining Reactor Coolant System (RCS) pressure temperature (P/T) limits and low temperature overpressure protection (LTOP) limits into the Administrative Controls section for the RCS Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR). This attachment is divided into six sections as follows. Section A summarizes all changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications while Section B provides the background and history associated with the changes being requested.
Section C provides the justifications associated with these proposed changes.
A no significant hazards consideration evaluation and environmental consideration ofthe requested changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications are provided in Sections D and E, respectively.
Section F lists all references used in this attachment.
A.
DESCRIPTION OF TECHNICALSPECIFICATION CHANGES This LAR proposes to revise the Ginna Station Technical Specifications to incorporate reference to the methodology for determining P/T and LTOP limits.
The change is summarized below and shown in Attachment II.
Administrative Controls 5.6.6 Item c willbe revised to reference the methodology for determining P/T and LTOP limits and to delete reference to Amendment No. 48.
B.
BACKGROVND During the conversion to improved standard technical specifications (ITS) for Ginna Station, RGAE had proposed to relocate the LTOP and RCS P/T limits to the PTLR (Ref. 1).
Associated with this change was the addition oF a reference to the Administrative Controls section oftechnical specifications related to the PTLR documenting the methodology used for all changes to these limits. However, the proposed methodology would be "new" with respect to determination ofboth the LTOP and RCS P/T limits. Due to time constraints, RG&E informed the NRC that use of this new methodology would be burdensome and instead, RGB wished to retain the existing values.
The NRC agreed with this concern and allowed the existing limits to be relocated to the PTLR but required changes to these limits to be reviewed and approved by the NRC as documented in Reference 2.
Subsequent to the conversion to ITS, Generic Letter 96-03 was released providing guidance to licensees for relocating the LTOP and RCS P/T limits to the PTLR with incorporation of the methodology for determining these limits added to the Administrative Controls section of technical specifications.
Also, the NRC's review of the latest reactor vessel capsule is nearing completion such that methodology for both RCS P/T limits and LTOP limits can now be incorporated into technical specifications without placing an undue burden on plant staff.
Generic Letter 96-03 requires that licensees reference the methodology in the technical specifications and provide a proposed PTLR using the methodology for NRC review. The proposed methodology for the P/T limitswillbe WCAP-14040, Revision 1 (Ref. 3) which has been generically approved for use by the NRC. However, the revised PTLR using this methodology willbe submitted at a later date upon completion ofthe NRC review of latest reactor vessel capsule data.
The proposed methodology for the LTOP limits is that documented in Reference 1 which has received previous NRC review during the technical specification conversion process.
This will also be reflected in the forthcoming revised PTLR.
C.
JUSTII'"ICATIONOF CHANGES This section provides the justification for all changes described in Section A above and shown in Attachment II. The justifications are organized based on whether the change is:
more restrictive (M), less restrictive (L), administrative (A), or the requirement is relocated (R).
The justifications listed below are also referenced in the technical specification(s) which are affected (see Attachment Il).
C.l A.l Administrative Controls Section 5.6.6.c is revised to state that "the analytical methods used to determine the RCS pressure and temperature and LTOP limits shall be those previously reviewed and approved by the NRC" versus referencing Amendment No. 48 to the technical specifications.
This change is administrative in nature since the RCS P/T limits and LTOP limits were previously relocated from-technical specifications to the PTLR. The only change being requested is that all future changes to these limits must be performed in accordance with NRC approved methodology instead of requiring a license amendment.
The change is also consistent with NUREG-1431 and Generic Letter 96-03.
There are not any more restrictive (M), less restrictive (L), or relocated (R) changes associated with this LAR.
D.
SIGNIFICANTHAZARDS CONSIDERATIONEVALUATION The proposed changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications as identified in Section Aand justified in Section C have been evaluated with respect to 10 CFR 50.92(c) and shown to not involve a significant hazards consideration as described below.
This section is organized based on Section C above.
D. 1 Ev lu ion of Admini tr ive h n e The administrative changes discussed in Section C.l do not involve a significant hazards consideration as discussed below:
Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the proposed changes does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
The proposed changes only require that future RCS P/T and LTOP limits be developed using NRC approved methodology as specified within the Administrative Controls section and do not involve any technical changes.
As such, these changes are administrative in nature and do not impact initiators or analyzed events or assumed mitigation of accident or transient events.
Therefore, these changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously analyzed.
Operation ofGinna Station in accordance with the proposed changes does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
The proposed changes do not involve a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new or different type of equipment will be installed) or changes in the methods governing normal plant operation.
The proposed changes willnot impose any new or different requirements.
Thus, this change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
Operation of Ginna Station in accordance with the'proposed changes does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
The proposed changes willnot reduce a margin of plant safety because the changes do not impact any safety analysis assumptions other than requiring future evaluations ofRCS P/T and LTOP limits to be performed in accordance with NRC approved methodology.
These changes are administrative in nature. As such, no question ofsafety is involved, and the change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Based upon the above information, it has been determined that the proposed administrative changes to the Ginna Station Technical Specifications do not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated, does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident previously evaluated, and does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Therefore, it is concluded that the proposed changes meet. the requirements of 10 CFR 50.92(c) and do not involve a significant hazards consideration.
E.
ENVIRONMENTALCONSIDERATION RGAE has evaluated the proposed changes and determined that:
1.
The changes do not involve a significant hazards consideration as documented in Section D above; 2.
The changes do not involve a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite since no specifications related to offsite releases are affected; and 3.
The changes do not involve a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure since no new or different type of equipment are required to be installed as a result ofthis LAR.
Accordingly, the proposed changes meet the eligibilitycriteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), an environmental assessment ofthe proposed changes is not required.
F.
REFERENCES Letter from R.R. Mecredy, RGAE, to A.A. johnson, NRC,
Subject:
Technical SpecifIcations Improvement Program, Reactor Coolant System (RCS) Pressure and Temperature LimitsReport (PTLR), dated December 8, 1995.
2.
Letter from L. B. Marsh, NRC, to R.R. Mecredy, RG8cE, RZ'. Ginna - Acceptance for Referencing ofPressure Temperature Limits Report (TAC 8 M92320), dated December 26, 1995.
3.
&CAP-14040, Methodology Used to Develop Cold Overpressure MitigatingSystem Setpoints and RCS Heatup and Cooldown LimitCurves, Revision 1.