ML070370072: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:SECY- More Protective Radiation Standards | {{#Wiki_filter:SECY- More Protective Radiation Standards - PHM-51 -11 Page 1 q PRM-01-11 | ||
-PHM-51 -11 PRM-01-11.. (71FR67072) | .. (71FR67072) | ||
From: Katie Silberman <katie @sehn.org> | |||
<katie @ sehn.org>To: <secy@nrc.gov> | To: <secy@nrc.gov> | ||
Date: Fri, Feb 2, 2007 11:18 AM | Date: Fri, Feb 2, 2007 11:18 AM DOCKETED | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
More Protective Radiation Standards | More Protective Radiation Standards - PRM-51-11 USNRC February 2, 2007 February 5, 2007 (10:40am), | ||
-PRM-51-11 February 2, 2007 Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Washington, DC 20555-0001 | Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OFFICE OF SECRETARY Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff RULEMAKINGS AND Washington, DC 20555-0001 ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Submitted via email: secy@nrc.gov. | ||
Re: More Protective Radiation Standards | Re: More Protective Radiation Standards - PRM-51-11 Federal Register notice http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/2006/November/Day-20/il 9568.htm | ||
-PRM-51-11 Federal Register notice http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/2006/November/Day-20/il 9568.htm Dear Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff: I am writing on behalf of the Science and Environmental Health Network ("SEHN"), a national non-profit organization dedicated to protecting public health and the environment. | |||
SEHN urges NRC to approve the petition for rulemaking that would provide more protective radiation standards at older reactors.Current standards for radiation are not sufficiently protective of human health. In making environmental decisions, SEHN advocates a precautionary stance, including consideration of the most vulnerable populations: | ==Dear Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff:== | ||
fetuses, infants and children; women in their reproductive years; and those with compromised immunity, among others.SEHN supports the work of the Alliance For A Clean Environment (ACE), a grass roots environmental group with members in the tri-county area surrounding the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. We urge the Commission to listen deeply to the knowledge and concerns of the people who live with the Plant in their midst -and experience the devastating health effects of radiation among their families and neighbors. | |||
For these families, rulemaking by the NRC is not an academic exercise, but a very matter of life and death.We thank you for considering our comments, and look forward to your decision.Sincerely, Ted Schettler, MD, MPH Science Director | I am writing on behalf of the Science and Environmental Health Network | ||
("SEHN"), a national non-profit organization dedicated to protecting public health and the environment. SEHN urges NRC to approve the petition for rulemaking that would provide more protective radiation standards at older reactors. | |||
: 22 : 59616) | Current standards for radiation are not sufficiently protective of human health. In making environmental decisions, SEHN advocates a precautionary stance, including consideration of the most vulnerable populations: fetuses, infants and children; women in their reproductive years; and those with compromised immunity, among others. | ||
SEHN supports the work of the Alliance For A Clean Environment (ACE), | |||
a grass roots environmental group with members in the tri-county area surrounding the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. We urge the Commission to listen deeply to the knowledge and concerns of the people who live with the Plant in their midst - and experience the devastating health effects of radiation among their families and neighbors. For these families, rulemaking by the NRC is not an academic exercise, but a very matter of life and death. | |||
We thank you for considering our comments, and look forward to your decision. | |||
Sincerely, Ted Schettler, MD, MPH Science Director | |||
MP Pacie 1 kcAtemp\GVV 100001. 1I MFJ c:\tempW~W1UUUU1. Paqe 1 i Mail Envelope Properties (45C36444.8E0 : 22 : 59616) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
More Protective Radiation Standards - PRM-51-11 Creation Date Fri, Feb 2, 2007 11:16 AM From: Katie Silberman <katie@sehn.org> | |||
-PRM-51-11 Fri, Feb 2, 2007 11:16 AM Katie Silberman | Created By: katie@sehn.org Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY) | ||
<katie@sehn.org> | Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1753 Friday, February 2, 2007 11:16 AM Part.001 1942 Mime.822 5406 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | ||
katie@sehn.org Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY)Post Office TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 | |||
Return Notification: | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Security: | No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}} |
Revision as of 10:46, 23 November 2019
ML070370072 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Limerick |
Issue date: | 02/02/2007 |
From: | Silberman K Science & Environmental Health Network (SEHN) |
To: | NRC/SECY/RAS |
Ngbea E S | |
References | |
71FR67072 00042, PRM-51-11 | |
Download: ML070370072 (2) | |
Text
SECY- More Protective Radiation Standards - PHM-51 -11 Page 1 q PRM-01-11
.. (71FR67072)
From: Katie Silberman <katie @sehn.org>
To: <secy@nrc.gov>
Date: Fri, Feb 2, 2007 11:18 AM DOCKETED
Subject:
More Protective Radiation Standards - PRM-51-11 USNRC February 2, 2007 February 5, 2007 (10:40am),
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OFFICE OF SECRETARY Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff RULEMAKINGS AND Washington, DC 20555-0001 ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Submitted via email: secy@nrc.gov.
Re: More Protective Radiation Standards - PRM-51-11 Federal Register notice http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/2006/November/Day-20/il 9568.htm
Dear Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff:
I am writing on behalf of the Science and Environmental Health Network
("SEHN"), a national non-profit organization dedicated to protecting public health and the environment. SEHN urges NRC to approve the petition for rulemaking that would provide more protective radiation standards at older reactors.
Current standards for radiation are not sufficiently protective of human health. In making environmental decisions, SEHN advocates a precautionary stance, including consideration of the most vulnerable populations: fetuses, infants and children; women in their reproductive years; and those with compromised immunity, among others.
SEHN supports the work of the Alliance For A Clean Environment (ACE),
a grass roots environmental group with members in the tri-county area surrounding the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. We urge the Commission to listen deeply to the knowledge and concerns of the people who live with the Plant in their midst - and experience the devastating health effects of radiation among their families and neighbors. For these families, rulemaking by the NRC is not an academic exercise, but a very matter of life and death.
We thank you for considering our comments, and look forward to your decision.
Sincerely, Ted Schettler, MD, MPH Science Director
MP Pacie 1 kcAtemp\GVV 100001. 1I MFJ c:\tempW~W1UUUU1. Paqe 1 i Mail Envelope Properties (45C36444.8E0 : 22 : 59616)
Subject:
More Protective Radiation Standards - PRM-51-11 Creation Date Fri, Feb 2, 2007 11:16 AM From: Katie Silberman <katie@sehn.org>
Created By: katie@sehn.org Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 SECY (SECY)
Post Office Route TWGWPO02.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1753 Friday, February 2, 2007 11:16 AM Part.001 1942 Mime.822 5406 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled