|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML13345B2782013-12-0909 December 2013
Comment (00355) of Lewis Cuthbert from the Alliance for a Clean Environment on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML0726705742007-09-24024 September 2007
Comment (13) of Lisa Rainwater on Behalf of Riverkeeper on Epstein'S PRM-50-85 Re to Extend the Minimum Distance from Five to Ten Miles for Host School Pick-up Points Beyond Plume Exposure Boundary Line
ML0717804182007-06-25025 June 2007
Comment (9) Submitted by Exelon Generation Company LLC, Darin M. Benyak, on Ucs'S PRM-73-13 Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 73, Physical Protection of Plants and Materials
ML0716305412007-06-12012 June 2007
Comment (9) Submitted by Exelon Generation Company, LLC, Darin M. Benyak on Pogo and Ucs Re Amend 10 CFR Part 50 Concerning Design Basis Threat
ML0703700772007-02-0303 February 2007
Comment (45) Submitted by Jean Flood on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation
ML0703700722007-02-0202 February 2007
Comment (42) Submitted by Katie Silberman and Ted Schettler on Behalf of Science and Environmental Health Network on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation
ML0703900422007-01-29029 January 2007
Comment (37) Submitted by Lisa Smoyer on Shaw'S Re Application of National of Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation
ML0703100792007-01-29029 January 2007
Comment (36) Submitted by M. L. Steiner on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Applicationo of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation
ML0703006632007-01-26026 January 2007
Comment (32) Submitted by Lewis Cuthbert on Behalf of Alliance for a Clean Environment on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation
ML0701807052007-01-14014 January 2007
Comment (11) Submitted by Jason Halteman on Shaw'S PRM-51-11 Re Application of National Academy of Science BEIR-VII Standard to Dose Radiation Calculation
ML0701804782007-01-13013 January 2007
Comment (1) Submitted by Three Mile Island Alert,L Inc., Eric Epstein on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51
RS-04-059, Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language2004-04-0909 April 2004
Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language
ML0323201352003-08-0101 August 2003
Comment (9) Submitted by Morgan Lewis & Brockus, Llp, Steven P. Frantz, P.M. Bessette, on Behalf of Exelon Gen., S. Texas, on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization & Treatment of Structures, Systems & Components for Nuclear Po
2013-12-09
[Table view] |
Text
PRM-51-11 DOCKETED (71 FR67072) USNRC January 29, 2007 February 6, 2007 (9:45am)
Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OFFICE OF SECRETARY Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff RULEMAKINGS AND Washington, DC 20555-0001 ATTN: ADJUDICATIONS STAFF
Subject:
More Protective Radiation Standards-PRM-5 1-11 As a Pottstown resident, who resides near the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant, I am urging you to please approve the petition for rulemaking that would provide more protective radiation standards at older reactors.
We are in a world that is constantly changing. We can not rely on or depend on old data and information to keep us safe. Our country faces new obstacles everyday, and September 1 1 th should be a reminder of that. Not only should we be doing everything in our power to make sure we are taking every precaution necessary from a nuclear or terrorists attack, but we should be taking precautions to protect the health and safety of the surrounding communities and environments.
We have very alarming elevated cancer rates here in Montgomery County. The statistics alone should be reason for concern. We all need to start stepping forward and doing our part to protect each other and our community before things get worse then they already are. We need to change things now before it is too late, to take the necessary protective actions that need to be put in place to start correcting past mistakes.
Our country needs to wake up and realize that they can not just take old or new information for that matter that is done on the average, healthy adult male. Testing needs to be done and/or considered, to be protective of children, babies, pregnant woman, the elderly, and those who already have immune system problems or complications.
Please consider how you would feel living near a nuclear power plant with your family, knowing all too well the alarming cancer rates and leukemia rates in the area. Wouldn't you want to do everything in your power to make sure your children and their future children would be safe and have a chance to grow up without health problems? I don't know about you, but I definitely want my family safe from "unnecessary and preventable harm!" I am asking you for your help to do just that. Please help make more protective radiation standards for nuclear power plants.
Sin erely, L(sa Soyer 1027 Farmington Ave.
Pottstown PA 19464 5 43 - , 7 . * :. .. i.,.I ;;". ., * '
