ML16207A126: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 58: Line 58:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender] Seabrook Hi John, I own you information and so does the NRC.
[External_Sender] Seabrook Hi John, I own you information and so does the NRC.
: 1)      The NRC response to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report 50-443/87-07 on November 12, 1987 involved the numerous unresolved cracks and leaks, BUT the "as built" failures and construction failures and as "as builder" staff not trained in ANSI standards required by UE&C-.was scary years ago.
: 1)      The NRC response to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report 50-443/87-07 on November 12, 1987 involved the numerous unresolved cracks and leaks, BUT the "as built" failures and construction failures and as "as builder" staff not trained in ANSI standards required by UE&C-.was scary years ago.
The unresolved issues fail to be NRC followed after
The unresolved issues fail to be NRC followed after

Revision as of 03:14, 27 April 2019

Email from D. Grinnell and Response from F. Bower Nextera - Seabrook (2016-SST-0548)
ML16207A126
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/21/2016
From: Bower F L
Reactor Projects Branch 3
To: Grinnell D
C-10 Research & Education Foundation
References
2016-SST-0548
Download: ML16207A126 (2)


Text

From: Bower, Fred To: debbie@c-10.org Cc: Lamb, John

Poole, Justin
Klukan, Brett
Pelton, David
Scott, Michael
Buford, Angela
Gray, Mel; Cook, William
Screnci, Diane
Sheehan, Neil
Bower, Fred

Subject:

RE: NEXTERA - SEABROOK [2016-SST-0548]

Date: Thursday, July 21, 2016 4:30:32 PM

Dear Ms. Grinnell,

Subject:

NEXTERA - SEABROOK [2016-SST-0548]

Staff in the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) forwarded me your email to Mr. John Lamb dated July 12, 2016, and I am writing to acknowledge its receipt. NRR staff have entered your email into ADAMS and will become a public record (ML16197A002) shortly. Once public, your incoming email can be located by searching for ML16197A002 at the following internet address:

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html.

We appreciate your questions.

During my initial review, I note that you made reference to NRC Inspection Report 50-443/87-07 dated November 12, 1987. I am working with NRR staff to determine whether this inspection report is readily available as a public record in ADAMS. A review of this document will be necessary to respond to your question(s).

You also made reference to a 2011 email from Mr. R. Conte. I will need a copy of Mr. Conte's email or its ADAMS Accession Number (ML#) to better understand your question and respond. Therefore, I request that you send me a copy of the document or its ML# when you are able.

Once we have the documents discussed above and in your email, NRC Region I staff will coordinate with NRR staff and we will respond to your questions when we are able and likely at the same time that we respond to your previous emails (ML16180A212 and ML16195A132) to Mr. Mel Gray and Ms. Angela Buford and other emails sent directly to me. In addition to responding to you directly, we plan to file our response to you in ADAMS and make it publically available.

Thank you for the opportunity to respond.

Sincerely, Fred Bower Chief l Projects Branch 3 l Division of Reactor Projects l Region I l U.S. NRC ll 2100 Renaissance Boulevard, STE 100, King of Prussia, PA 19406 ll : (610) 337-5200 l : Fred.Bower@nrc.gov l From: Lamb, John Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:40 PM To: Poole, Justin <Justin.Poole@nrc.gov>

Subject:

FW: Seabrook

From: Debbie Grinnell [

mailto:debbie@c-10.org

]

Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:23 PM To: Lamb, John <

John.Lamb@nrc.gov

>

Subject:

[External_Sender] Seabrook Hi John, I own you information and so does the NRC.

1) The NRC response to Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report 50-443/87-07 on November 12, 1987 involved the numerous unresolved cracks and leaks, BUT the "as built" failures and construction failures and as "as builder" staff not trained in ANSI standards required by UE&C-.was scary years ago.

The unresolved issues fail to be NRC followed after

construction-and the plant passive issues were active, rightly?

2) The five cores from R. Conte in 2011 in an email has about the NRC and NextEra agreement to test the cores for tensile-NextEra did not test them.

Where are they?

Debbie