ENS 43368: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
| event date = 05/17/2007 13:40 EDT
| event date = 05/17/2007 13:40 EDT
| last update date = 05/17/2007
| last update date = 05/17/2007
| title = Offsite Notification Due To Failed Emissions Test
| title = Offsite Notification Due to Failed Emissions Test
| event text = I am calling you to provide a notification of a potentially failed air emission test on an auxiliary boiler. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that any emissions from our boilers caused any harm to human health, welfare, or the environment. The emissions are not continuing and there is no assistance required or requested. The statute requires I provide this notification to assert an affirmative defense or a rescission as appropriate. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Hotline was called to report this, Case number 07-0517-134537, operator 27.
| event text = I am calling you to provide a notification of a potentially failed air emission test on an auxiliary boiler. There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that any emissions from our boilers caused any harm to human health, welfare, or the environment. The emissions are not continuing and there is no assistance required or requested. The statute requires I provide this notification to assert an affirmative defense or a rescission as appropriate. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Hotline was called to report this, Case number 07-0517-134537, operator 27.
During the start-up tuning and testing of our new auxiliary boilers, it appears that a malfunction of equipment during testing resulted in inconclusive test results for NOx loading for our #1 Boiler. For the testing runs, the measured volumetric stack flows were significantly higher than the stoichiometrically calculated stack flows based on fuel flow measurements.
During the start-up tuning and testing of our new auxiliary boilers, it appears that a malfunction of equipment during testing resulted in inconclusive test results for NOx loading for our #1 Boiler. For the testing runs, the measured volumetric stack flows were significantly higher than the stoichiometrically calculated stack flows based on fuel flow measurements.

Latest revision as of 22:16, 1 March 2018

ENS 43368 +/-
Where
Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
New Jersey (NRC Region 1)
Reporting
10 CFR 50.72(b)(2)(xi), Notification to Government Agency or News Release
Time - Person (Reporting Time:+-3.55 h-0.148 days <br />-0.0211 weeks <br />-0.00486 months <br />)
Opened: Bernard Litkett
14:07 May 17, 2007
NRC Officer: Jason Kozal
Last Updated: May 17, 2007
43368 - NRC Website
Loading map...