ML14322A260: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML14322A260 | | number = ML14322A260 | ||
| issue date = 12/01/2014 | | issue date = 12/01/2014 | ||
| title = | | title = Acceptance Review Concerning Amendment Request for Approval of Revision to the Radiation Emergency Plan | ||
| author name = Williams S | | author name = Williams S | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1 | ||
| addressee name = Gatlin T | | addressee name = Gatlin T | ||
| addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co | | addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co | ||
| docket = 05000395 | | docket = 05000395 | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
| project = TAC:MF5183 | | project = TAC:MF5183 | ||
| stage = Acceptance Review | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 1, 2014 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station P.O. Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 SUBJECT: VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW CONCERNING AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF REVISION TO THE RADIATION EMERGENCY PLAN (TAC NO. MF5183) Dear Mr. Gatlin: By letter dated November 12, 2014, the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) submitted a license amendment request for approval of a revision to the Radiation Emergency Plan. The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 0 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and' depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate T. Gatlin | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 1, 2014 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station P.O. Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 | ||
}} | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW CONCERNING AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF REVISION TO THE RADIATION EMERGENCY PLAN (TAC NO. MF5183) | |||
==Dear Mr. Gatlin:== | |||
By letter dated November 12, 2014, the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) submitted a license amendment request for approval of a revision to the Radiation Emergency Plan. | |||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 0 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. | |||
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. | |||
Given the lesser scope and' depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate | |||
T. Gatlin acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1009. | |||
Sincerely, Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing . | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Distribution via Listserv | |||
ML14322A260 OFFICE LPL2-1/PM LPL2-1/LA LPL2-1/BC LPL2-1/PM NAME SWilliams SFigueroa RPascarelli SWilliams DATE 11/24/14 11/25/14 11/26/14 12/01/14}} | |||
Latest revision as of 19:21, 31 October 2019
| ML14322A260 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 12/01/2014 |
| From: | Shawn Williams Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | Gatlin T South Carolina Electric & Gas Co |
| Williams S | |
| References | |
| TAC MF5183 | |
| Download: ML14322A260 (3) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 December 1, 2014 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station P.O. Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
SUBJECT:
VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 -ACCEPTANCE REVIEW CONCERNING AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF REVISION TO THE RADIATION EMERGENCY PLAN (TAC NO. MF5183)
Dear Mr. Gatlin:
By letter dated November 12, 2014, the South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) submitted a license amendment request for approval of a revision to the Radiation Emergency Plan.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 0 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required.
This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment.
Given the lesser scope and' depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate
T. Gatlin acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1009.
Sincerely, Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing .
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Distribution via Listserv
ML14322A260 OFFICE LPL2-1/PM LPL2-1/LA LPL2-1/BC LPL2-1/PM NAME SWilliams SFigueroa RPascarelli SWilliams DATE 11/24/14 11/25/14 11/26/14 12/01/14