ML13219A032: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 02/14/2012
| issue date = 02/14/2012
| title = Email from J. Poehler to C. Basavaraju, FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis
| title = Email from J. Poehler to C. Basavaraju, FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis
| author name = Poehler J C
| author name = Poehler J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR
| addressee name = Basavaraju C
| addressee name = Basavaraju C
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Poehler, Jeffrey                                                                                        "4 From:                    Poehler, Jeffrey Sent:                    Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:25 PM To:                      Basavaraju, Chakrapani Cc:                      Kim, James; Cheruvenki, Ganesh
==Subject:==
FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)
Attachments:              Core Plate Hold Down Bolt SE Input ME6248 - (2-7-12).docx Pani, attached is my input to the SE for the areas that I reviewed - specifically, the determination of the amount of preload loss and the adequacy of the proposed inspection plan. Ganesh peer reviewed for me, see email below.
I'm not sure how you structured your SE, so feel free to move things around and cut and paste my sections as needed. We probably should meet to discuss. I'll be in the office tomorrow and Thursday.
: Thanks, Jeff From: Cheruvenki, Ganesh / "      ..
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 012 10:20 AM To: Poehler, Jeffrey
==Subject:==
RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)
Jeff-Looks good-specially the statistical approach From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:25 AM To: Cheruvenki, Ganesh Cc: Purtscher, Patrick
==Subject:==
RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)
Did you guys have time to comment?
From: Cheruvenkl, Ganesh Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:07 PM To: Poehler, Jeffrey
==Subject:==
RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)
Will do.
From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 AM To: Cheruvenki, Ganesh Cc: Purtscher, Patrick
==Subject:==
Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)
: Ganesh, 21 B
As discussed yesterday, please peer review (technical only) my SE input for Vermont Yankee. Use TAC ME6248. Note that it is not a complete SE because Pani has the lead on the SE. He can integrate my inputs into the structure of his SE.
If you can give me comments by the end of the week that would be fine.
Pat, I copied you so if you have time to review your comments would also be appreciated.
: Thanks, Jeff 22}}

Latest revision as of 16:07, 4 November 2019

Email from J. Poehler to C. Basavaraju, FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis
ML13219A032
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/14/2012
From: Jeffrey Poehler
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Chakrapani Basavaraju
NRC/NRR/DE/EMCB
References
FOIA/PA-2013-0139
Download: ML13219A032 (2)


Text

Poehler, Jeffrey "4 From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 1:25 PM To: Basavaraju, Chakrapani Cc: Kim, James; Cheruvenki, Ganesh

Subject:

FW: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)

Attachments: Core Plate Hold Down Bolt SE Input ME6248 - (2-7-12).docx Pani, attached is my input to the SE for the areas that I reviewed - specifically, the determination of the amount of preload loss and the adequacy of the proposed inspection plan. Ganesh peer reviewed for me, see email below.

I'm not sure how you structured your SE, so feel free to move things around and cut and paste my sections as needed. We probably should meet to discuss. I'll be in the office tomorrow and Thursday.

Thanks, Jeff From: Cheruvenki, Ganesh / " ..

Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 012 10:20 AM To: Poehler, Jeffrey

Subject:

RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)

Jeff-Looks good-specially the statistical approach From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 9:25 AM To: Cheruvenki, Ganesh Cc: Purtscher, Patrick

Subject:

RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)

Did you guys have time to comment?

From: Cheruvenkl, Ganesh Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 12:07 PM To: Poehler, Jeffrey

Subject:

RE: Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)

Will do.

From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 10:45 AM To: Cheruvenki, Ganesh Cc: Purtscher, Patrick

Subject:

Peer Review of SE Input for Vermont Yankee Core Plate Bolt Analysis (ME6248)

Ganesh, 21 B

As discussed yesterday, please peer review (technical only) my SE input for Vermont Yankee. Use TAC ME6248. Note that it is not a complete SE because Pani has the lead on the SE. He can integrate my inputs into the structure of his SE.

If you can give me comments by the end of the week that would be fine.

Pat, I copied you so if you have time to review your comments would also be appreciated.

Thanks, Jeff 22