ML20073D907

Annual Environ Operating Rept Part B:Radiological

ML20073D907
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	12/31/1990
From:	Woodard J ALABAMA POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
NUDOCS 9104290284
Download: ML20073D907 (39)

Text

r i

[

• Alabama Power Compan, 40 In'.emess Center Pa6 way Post O'bce Da IP95 B rmtngnam A:auma 3',201 Teiepnone 205 868 50 %

m J. D. Woodard bdf)3fild h0WCf Vce Prescent-N.giear raney Pro 4ect A P ril 26, gggg fw,g,y,,,, ,gf,c sg7g,7 Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Vashington, DC 20555 Joseph H. Farley Nuclear Plant Annual Environmental Operating Report Radiological Gentlemen The attached " Annual Environnental Operating Report, Part B: Radiological" for calendar year 1990, is transmitted in accordance with the Joseph H.

Parley Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specifications Section 6.9.1.6.

If you have any quertions, please advise.

Respectfully _ submitted, w mk

. . Woodard JDV/BHV: map 0151 l Attachment cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr. S. T. Hoffman Mr. G. F. Maxwell L

State of Alabama Director, Division of Radiation Control State of Georgia

Director, Environmental Protection Division l

l l

/

9104290294 901231 1h PDR R

ADOCK 05000348 PDR b&

d f i

l

y

\

ALABAMA PONER COMPANY ANNUAL DNIRONMENTAL OPERATING REIORT PART B: RADIOLOGICAL i JOSEPil M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NO. 1 LICENSE NO. NPF-2 AND UNIT NO 2 '

LICENSE NO. NPF-8 PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31,.1990 i-i i

t t

D N Annual Report /2 1

. _ _ _ _ . . _ . - . _ . . . . . . _ _ , _ m_ _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , _ _

1 --

5:

. .. ]

l

.^

1 l

1 k

i ANNUAL ENVIRONMElfrAL OPERATING REPORT - 1 PART Bt RADIOLOGICAL' '

L TABLE OF CONTENTS

.t Section Title Page, , -- i

~I Introduction 1: ,

II Radiological' Sampling:and: Analysis.

2 III' Results and Discussion :5 J

IV LandUseCensusand-Interlaboratory;.Comparisong _

8 - i Program -1

.i V Mta Trends and Conclusions ~- 8 -l ,

-i d.

N M

I 4

.f 4

-l t } '.

' i,

--i !,

e

, .< [

11 4

'h

,{' ,

'i lf

, 2..

~

, j . t .

~

+

.y :,x. . lw-)

I RADIOLOGICAL DWIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT LIST OF FIGURES .,

Figure Title Page 3.12-1 Indicator Sampling Locations for Airborne 9 Envi'ronmental Radioactivity at the Farley Nuclear Plant.

3.12-2 community (Indicator II) Sampling Locations for 10 Direct Radiation in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area.

3.12-3 control Sampling Locations for Airborne 11 Environmental Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area.

3.12-4 Indicator and control Sampling Locations for. 12 Waterborne Environmental Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area.

11 ENV Annual Report /2

- - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ . _ _

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRCNMENTAL OPERATING R'EPORT LIST OF TABLES Table Title Page 1 Scope of Operational Radiological Environmental 13 Monitoring Program at the Parley Nuclear Plant During 1990 2 Outline-of Operational Radiological Environmental 14 Monitoring Program for Farley Nuclear Plant During 1990 3 Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample 19 Analysis for Farley Nuclear Plant 4 Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations 21 in Environmental Samples 5 Sampling and Analysis Deviations'During_1990 22 1990-01 Airborne Particulates - Operational Radioactivity 25 Summary 1990-02 Airborne: Iodine - Operational' Radioactivity 26 Summary ,

1990-03 External Radiation - Operational Radioactivity 27 l Summary 1990-04 Milk - Operational Radioactivity Summary 28' 1990-05 Vegetation: Forage - Operational' Radioactivity. '29 Summary 1990-06 Soil - Operational Radioactivity Summary '30 1990-07 Waterborne: Surface Water - Operational 31' Radioactivity Summary 1990-00 Waterborne: Ground Water - Operational 32' Radioactivity Summary 111-'

ENV Annual-Report /2

4' RADIOLOGICAL DNIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT.

LIST OF TABLES COffrINUED Table Title PageL 1990-09 Sediment: River - Operational' Radioactivity; - 34 1

Summary '-

1990-10 rish: River (Game) - Operational' Radioactivity 35 1 Stmmary ,

1990-11 rish's River (Bottom reeding). ' Operational Radioactivity Stenary _

j u

'(

I'

. 4 i' l

4 -

-iv..

,DN Annual' Report /2-i g m

,,i,,i , , ,

..C,__._2______._ __m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ ,

RADIOIX)GICAL DNIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT i

LIST OF ATIAODiENTS Attachment Title Page 1 Land Use Survey for Radiological Environmental 37 Monitoring Program, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, June 9, 1990 v

DN Annual Report /2

i i

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL E2NIRONMENTAL PROGRAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 I. Introduction The Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, owned and operated by Alabama Power Company (APCo), located in Houston County, Alabama is approximately fifteen miles east of Dothan, Alabama on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River. Unit 1, a Westinghouse Electric Corporation Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) with a rated power output of'860 megawatts electrical (MWe) achieved initial criticality on August 9,-1977. The unit.was' declared " commercial" on December 1, 1977. Unit No. 2, also a 860 MWe Westinghouse PWR, achieved initial criticality on May 8, 1981 and was declared

" commercial" on July 30, 1981.

During 1990, Unit II was off-line from October 13, 1990 through the l end of the year for the seventh refueling outage. I The sample collection and analysis schedule for the operational off-site radiological environmental monitoring program implemented in May 1977 and as modified on July 1,-1980 with the. addition of 14-TLD stations was continued during 1990'for both Units No. 1 and'2.

The program was further modified effective April 1982 to reflect Amendment No. 26 to the Unit 1 Technical Specifications issued March 1, 1982. The program was changed a third time in 1989 with the addition of two more control TLDs. This program was designed to monitor-any radioactivity contribution _to the environment from the plant through either the airborne or waterborne pathways. The type of samples monitored, and number and type of sampling stations are shown in Table 1. Indicator sampling stations are located, where:

practical, at locations where detection of the radiological effects of t.cs plant's operation-is thought to .be most likely, where the -

samples collected should provide a significant indication of potential dose to man, and where an adequate comparison of predicted radiological levels might be made with measured levels.

The control stations are placed at locations where radiological levels are not expected to be significantly influenced by plant operation, i.e. , at background locations. For Some1 airborne ,

radioactivity samples, community stations are located at the principal population centers between the indicator and the control stations (3-8 miles). Community stations could be used, if desired, as additional control stations, and alternatively, as indicator stations-for the nearest population centers in the event-of a major airborne release from the plant.

1 1

II. Radiological Sampling and Analysis A detailed outline of the operational radiological sampling and analyets activities for the environmental program to meet the requirements of the Unit 1 and 2 Technical Specifications is given in Tables 1 and 2. For each parameter only one sample was rollected and one analysis performed to meet the specifications for both Units No. 1 and 2. j The samples were collected by APCo's technical staff except for the g situ high purity germanium (HP(Ge)) gamma-ray spectroscopy measurements of soil. The latter were collected by staff members of the University of Georgia (UGA), Center for Applied Isotopo Studies.

All sample analyses except TLDs were contracted to UGA; TLDs are.

tead at the plant. The minimum detectable concentration (Mrc),

specified for ' 1 various samples and their respective analyses are given in Table 1. The reporting levels for radioactivity concentrations in environmental samples are provided in Table 4.

Sampling and analysis deviations during 1990 are listed in Table 5. i A. Airborne Particulates and Iodine 7 All airborne particulate and iodine monitoring stations shown in Figures 3.12-1 through 3.12-3 were equipped with Roots vacuumpumpswhichop/

approximately 0.04 m min (1.5ft/ min).erated contipuously at a flow rate of The particulates were collected on Gelman Metricel Sum filtera. In series.

with, but downstream of the particulate filters, NJ 50 mm (or equivalent) activated charcoal cartridges were used for collection of iodine. The Roots system has the sample collector mounted outside of the cabinet horizontally to the ground with a Singer gas meter measuring the cumulative air flow. The gas meters were calibrated against a certified flow meter. Both the particulate filters and charcoal cartridges were collected weekly and sent to UGA for radioactivity analysis.

Gross beta radioactivity measurements were performed on each air particulate filter using a Tennelec low background alpha-beta counting system. The filters from each station, composited at the end of each quarter, were analyzed for gamma emitters using a fifteen percent relative efficiency low background germanium lithium (Ge(Li)) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based multichannel analyzer (MCA)..

All air monitoring station locations shown in' Figures 3.12-1 through 3.12-3 have the capability of monitoring airborne iodine. Weekly routine samples were analyzed for I-131 by UGA using a Canberra 1024 channel MCA and two 1" x 3" Na1 detectors and matched photomultiplier tubes.

2 I

s. External Radiation for the continuous measurement of environmental gamma radiation, natural Lithium riuoride (Lir) (TLD-700) chips, manufactured by Harshaw-riltrol Chemical Company, were used.

TLD packets, each containing four annealed Lir chips, were sealed in opaque nylar to produce a packet that was light-tight, weather-proof,andwhicahadalowpass attenuation for radiation (approximately 50mg/cm ). on the plant site, all TLD packets were kept in' a lead safe with 2-inch walla except for those receiving field exposure or those )

in the process of being exchanged.

At each external radiation monitoring station (shown in rigures i 3.12-1, 3.12-2, and 3.12-3), two TLD packets, one changed and read quarterly and one changed and read annually, were exposed side-by-side on metal stakes at a height of one meter above the ground. For the computation of the net field doses, a log of all exposure periods was maintained for each TLD packet.

C. Milk The milk sample location is as indicated on rigure 3.12-3. All milk samples, collected bi-weekly, were analyzed W UGA for I-131 and gamma emitters. As a preservative for shipment,1 nd of 25 weight percent merthiolate (Thimerasol) solution was added to each one gallon sample. The I-131 concentration in each s g le was determined by collection on anion exchange resin, elution with sodium h chlorite, followed by organic-extraction and counting, by ta-gamma coincidence, the resultant toluene-iodine solution in a low level liquid scintillation counter. Stable iodine carrier was added to each sample for determination of the radiochemical yield.

A one liter qua.itity of each sample was placed in a marinelli beaker and then analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) dete", tor and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.

D. Vegetation: Forage Monthly, forage was collected from indicator grass plots located near the air monitoring stations at the plant site perimeter in sectors 7 (SSE) and 16 (N), or. alternate plots if needed, and from a control grass plot located near the air monitoring station in Dothan, Alaoama.' After drying and pulverizing, the samples were analyzed by UGA for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.

3

==

E. Soil Annual in situ gama-ray spectroscopy measurements were made by UGA using a 10 percent relative efficiency high purity  ;

germanium detector and gamma-ray spectroscopy system specially -

designed for field use. Measurements were taken at the six  ;

indicator locations and at the five community and control (background) locations listed in Table 2. A 1024 channel  ;

Canberra MCA interfaced to a Hewlett-Packard 9825A calculator j was used for data storage and analysis. '

F. Surface (River) Water Samples of water from the Chattahoochee River, above and below the plant site at the locations shown in rigure 3.12-4 were collected on a semi-continuous basis with Instrumentation Specialties Company (ISCO) samplers. Monthly composites were-sent to UGA for radioactivity analysis. W o liter aliquots from each monthly composite were placed in trays lined with plastic film and evaporated to dryness at 100'C. The residue (on plastic film) was folded to fit a petri-dish and analyzed for gama emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency Ge(L1) low background detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.

l At the end of each quarter, for each sampling location, the balance of the three monthly composites were combined to give a quarterly composite sample. Approximately 50 m1 from each quarterly composite sample was distilled and a 25 ml aliquot taken for tritium analysis using a laroe volume (100 ml)

Hewlett-Packard 200 low background liq 61d scintillation Counter.

G. Ground (Well) Water In the rarley Plant area there are no true. indicator sources of groundwater. A well' which serves Georgia Pacific Paper Company I as a source of potable water, located on the east bank of tae Chattahoochee River about four miles south-southeast of the plant, was sampled on a quarterly basis and designated as an  !

indicator station. A deep well which supplies water to the '

Whatley residence located about 1.2 miles southwest of the  !

plant was sampled on a quarterly basis and designated as a control (background) station. Samples from both were sent to  !

UGA for radioactivity analysis. .An aliquot from each sample was taken for tritium analysis. After-distillation, 25 ml  !

samples were analyzed using a large volume (100 ml) low background liquid scintillation counter, c' rom the remainder of each sample, a two liter aliquot was taken and evaporated to dryness at 100'C in a tray lined with plastic film. The 4

residue (on plastic film) was folded to fit a petri dish and a analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative-efficiency Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA. i 4

l

t H. Fish (River)

Semi-annually, two types of fish, game and bottom feeding, were collected from the Chattahoochee River at the locations shown in rigure 3.12-4, and sent to UGA for gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis. Both semi-annual fish samples sent to UGA consisted of fish fillets that had been split with Alabama Division of Radiation Control. These fish samples were coarsely chopped at UGA and were anlayzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and 4096 channel Canberra computer-based MCA.

I. Sediment (River)

Semi-annually, sediment samples were collected from the Chattahoochee River at the locations shown in rigure 3.12-4.

Approximately one kilogram of sample was sent to UGA where it l was dried, mixed, and analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15-  !

percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and j a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.. One semi-annual -

sediment-sample was split with Alabama Division of Radiation  !

Control, o l

III. Results and Discussion No known atmospheric nuclear tests were conducted during 1990.

For measurements involvina radioactivity concentrations by volume or j mass the designation " minimum detectable concentration" (MDC)-is i defined in Table 3. .

l ror measurements involving a quantity of: radioactivity or radiation

^

that is independent of the sample volume or mass, the designation

" lower limit of detection (LLD)" is'used to denote the limit of ,

detection applicable at the 95 percent confidence level; %e LLD is i defined as "the smallest amount of sample activity that will yield a net count for which there is confidence at a predetermined level that activity is present." Its application is limited to measurement systems which denote a limiting detection capability-without respect to the size of. sample and/or radiochemical yield and-- .

to measurements which by their nature do.not involve concentrations, l

e.g. radiation dose rates (mrad /hr. , mrad /qtr., etc. ).

i

'i 5

1

_= -

A. Airborne Particulates The results of the radioactivity analyses of airborne I particulate filters are shown in Table 1990-01. The mean gross beta activity values for the air particulate indicator, i

l community and control sampling locations were of the same value. The gross beta activity mean for all locations was j higher than in 1989 and lover than the preoperational period.

{

The gross beta and gamma spectroscopy data for the air particulate filter composites showed Os-137, Cs-134 and I-131 below HDC at all sampling locations.

B. Airborne Iodine The results of the radioactivity analyses of iodine charcoal cartridges are shown in Table 1990-02. The iodine activity for 1990 samples at all locations was less than the minimum detectable concentration values. The nominal HDC was less than the 1989 value.

• C. External Radiation The results of the external radiation measurements using TLD packets are shown in Table 1990-03. As found during the preoperational period and during 1989, the data reflect the differences in site specific soil radioactivity. Exposures recorded by quarterly TLDs in 1990 were slightly higher than-those recorded in 1989 for indicator, community and control sampling locations. The exposures recorded by annual indicator, community, and control TLDs in 1990 were higher than those observed in 1989 and the preoperational period.

Also evident in 1990 as in previous years, the exposures >

recorded by annual TLDs were less than the sum of the exposures from the associated quarterly TLDs.

D. Hilk The results from the radioactivity analyses of milk are shovn in Table 1990-04. Hilk from the Levis Dairy was sampled as the control location. There were no indicator samples during 1990. Only K-40 was detected in control samples. The value vas increased over the 1989 value.

6 l

, E. Vegetation L

Forage was the only vegetation sampled during 1990. The radioactivity analysis results are shown in Table 1990-05.

Forage, as during the preoperational period, continued to be a very effective and sensitive indicator of airborne radioactivity. Traces of Cs-137 vere found in some indicator samples. The data for 1990 indicated fever fission product radionuclides than the preoperational data.

F. Soil  !

The results of the in situ HP(Ge) gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis of soil duHng this operational period are shown in.

Table 1990-06. The only man-made radioactivity found in all

" measurements.was Cs-137. During the preoperational period,- l the fission prorNets Zr-95, Nb-95 and Cs-134 vere seen at.most ,

of the locat'Ons in addition to Cs-137. The 1990 levels of I Cs-137 found at indicator locations were not significantly different from control and community locations and vere lover than the 1989 levels and the preoperational levels.

a G. Vaterborne Activity (Surface Vater)

The results.of radioactivity analysis of surface water are shown in Table 1990-07. Cs-137 and Cs-134 activity levels. .

vere belov the measured HDC values. All other radionuclides, 1 i excluding tritium vere belov MDC level as well.

The average surface water indicator tritium level was lover

than in 1989.

t '

l H. Vaterborne Activity (Ground Vater)

The results of the radioactivity analysis of' ground water are i ebovn in Table 1990-08. The Cs-134, Cs-137, and I-131-

activity. values for 1990 were less than HDC as vas observed in j 1989. The Cs-137 value was lover than the preoperational data.

I. River Sediment

The results of radioactivity analysis of sediment' samples from i

the Chattahoochee River.are-shown in Table 1990-09. Cs-134 and Cs-137 concentrations were;belov HDC.in'both 1989 and-1990. The isotopic concentrations ofqallLisotopes greater than HDC, except for K-40,.for 1990 indicator locations vere--

greater-than those recorded-inl1989. The concentrations ofL ,

isotopes greater than HDC. recorded for 1990 control--locations

. were greater than those recorded in 1989, except for K-40 k Ra-226.  ;

}

} .7 I

._ d

I J. Game Fish (River)

The results of gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis _of the edible portions of game fish taken from the Chattahoochee' River are shown in Table 1990-10. Cs-137 was found at lov levels in the indicator samples of game fish. The 1990 average indicator Cs-137 value vas found to be lover than 1989 and-  !

preoperational data. l K. Bottom-Feeding Fish (River)-

The results of gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis of.the edible portions of bottom feeding fish taken~from the Chattahoochee- -

River are shown in Table 1990-11. . All isotope-values were below HDC, except K-40. The K-40 levels in indicator samples were slightly lover than the 1989 levels. The control sample .

levels vere higher than 1989. levels.  :

IV. Land Use Census and Interlaboratory Comparison Program.

A. Land Use Census The results of the June,- 1990, Land Use Census are given in Attachment 1 to-this report.

-I B. Interlaboratory Comparison Program During 1990, the University of Georgia Center for Applied.

Isotope Studies (UGA) was a participant:in the EPA Crosscheck ->

Program. The UGA EPA Program code designation is EA. :Although Farley Nuclear Plant (FNP) also participates in.the EPA crosscheck Program under code designation FU, only TLD- 1 analyses were performed by FNP.

V. Data Trends and conclusion i

A review of the 1990 environmental data: indicate'some-changes.in the paramaters monitored when compared to 1989 data. Cs-137 was t

.present in some-forage indicator sampics and game fish samples. ,

=The surface water tritium was less than.the 1989 levels. .The 1 external gamma radiation values vere higher as compared to 1989 TLD  !

measurements. Bottom-feeding fish showed slightly higher K-40:

Llevels. 'K-40 is a naturally occurring isotope and-is not related-to any plant operations or? releases. . No significant: changes vere

~

indicated in air particulates, milk, air iodine,'solli vater, game 4

fish and sediment.1 Therefore,-data obtained during the 1990' , )

. sampling year-demonstrate that:there vas no adverse impaction the

' surrounding environs of:Farley Nuclear Plant as.a recult of its operation.-

. 8-

---

= _

^

- ,- -l,hn~,, ,,,.g. ,,v,.m -

~,~r --r-. -<nn,.,-+---,-,v,, . e'- - , , , ,,n v,---c , ew- ,. ,-

i O

- DT -- -. #.

i

] 16

, 7175 WAKt SPLIT-NORMAL %

NNW Nht .

X/Q = 1.0.10-'

j 14

/4

,.*,,,,,j sg*,. t

$tC/M'

1 .

.- 1 .

in " ,A s ~.' ,

l 3

\ -

\ h,...t"(1.,i, y'  ! @re aa b N

, g; ,, -

~ /

9=.g .

/:=.A,,,N, .

, ....L

/

@ [] wsw .,

h,'*'% ,\ E 10 p'

( -

s.,,,,. u,, / * . . ,

. . I

\ \'% ,-

sw 5

.... i

] taine si,.ct. .

SE 8'], , \{

-),, ii,.<i... y A ssw 8

sSt 3

y b....

?

e;/, ,

_ . . _ . (

T g g, A-

+ FORAGE $AMPLING A TLD $AMPLING

@ TLD, PARTICULATES & 100lN[ $AMPLING INDICATOR SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR AIRBORNE ENVIRONMENTAL RADI0 ACTIVITY AT THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLAN FIGURE 3.121 9

l- .;

thM t

\'l / ,

hat

/'"" l 14 l .!

Nw I hl COLUWBIA I NILf0N 13

\ 3 WNw th!

u 5

, 11 i

\/ 1057Tal rant 6 I

4

h. '

) - N nuctru etant N  ; CIDAR g a _

$PtlNGl ASHFORD 11 g \ $

wsw tst N g o.3 CORDON it 10

\ $

SW $[

JAXIN

, , I

$5W tst

{)\

l l

I ',' i i i i ; i e TLD $AMPLING COMMUNITY (INDICATOR II) SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR DIRECT RADIATION IN THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AREA.

FIGURE 3.12 2

.10 4

y

a L. a _. . . . - . -_...__.4 _ _ _ m _ - -

1

.. Ey I s

. 4J * . . . . .

Afm l

.,,,,......,j ...... . . . . . EbN

$4@9 g .

"E_ * !!!  !

\ /

.' { r\ ..

...... , c 4 m

/

%. r

"' I A

dl\ #

.dm y(-

y'/'

g j i

,,e n\ }

. . /

~Cl g,.-

,-.. l'l s g

.  : I. ..

lg ,

.. . ... y R

,, ai ...,,,,,,.., i..." "'" h

-I :I ]

.. l

~,

e j

. _. g ,

l NI , ........ ~'" , , .

t. . . . . . . . . .g.. . . . -  ;;

e 3 } l,1W ""J,'.;

=,I n, i

-1 '

E:[je;r.i a  :

E CONTROL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR AIRBORNE ENVIRONMENTAL RADI0 ACTIVITY IN THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AREA.

FIGURE 3.12 3 11 l

. . _ _ _ . _ . ~ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ . . . . . ._ .. _ _ _ - . . _ . _ _ _ _ . .

/

COLUM8IA 57 12 LOCK & AM IARLty 10 Mill! / h NT ASHIORD h $\M CIO A S

i,

.s

\,,

l " "i'%' !""

INDICATOR STAtl0NS CONTROL STAil0NS E SURfAct AND GROUNO WAftR h $URfAct WAftR, fish AND $tDlWtNT x riSH ANo Stoiutni @ ciouno WArti I

INDICATOR AND CONTROL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR WATERBORNE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIDACTIVITY l IN THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AREA FIGURE 3.12 4

.12 I

-i

I 1

1 TABLE 1 1

SCOPE OF OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL

_ MONITORING PROGRAM AT THE TARLEY NUCLEAR PLART DURING 1990 Principal Type of Number of Sangling Stations Pathway Sanples Indicator community ,

control Airborne Particulates 4 3 3 1

Airborne Iodine 4 1 3 Direct' Radiation 16 18 6 r Airborne Milk - - 1 rorage' 2 - 1 6

Soi1 6 3 2 i

River Water 1 . -

1..

Groundwater l' -

1= l Waterborne River Fish l' -

1 River Sediment 1 -

=1 Vegetable and frult sampling discontinued u yn-implementation of Unit 1 Technical Specification Amendment No.-26, issued Marc 1 1,-1982.

6 Annual M Situ Gamma Measurements continued by choice of license.e during.1990, -

d t

i I

13 '

c

Annual ENV Report /3L  !

I

-7wg g uW, 4 -e d y $ ~T-* ( tu 'T4Y-"W '

'T if*U 't

~

B BLE 2 OUTLINE OF OPERATICNAL RADIOIOGICAL ENVIRCNE2fIAL -

ImrIORING PROGRAM ETE FARLEY NUCLEAR PIRff DURING 1990 Types of Samples

'and Sampling Type and Freg2ency Sampling Incations and of (Distances Given in Miles) Collection Frequency Analysis AIRBORNE Particulates Ccmtinuous operation of sampler with Particulate sampler sample collection being performed as required by dust loading, but at least Analyze for gross beta once per 7 days. radioactivity > 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Indicator Stations: follawing filter change.

Perform <fumma isotopic North Perimeter (N-0.8) analysis on each sample South Perimeter (SSE-1.0) when gross beta activity Plant Entrance (NSN-0.9) is >10 times the yearly River Intake Structure (ESE-0.8) mean of control samples.

Perform gasuna isotopic analysis on composite Cormuunity Stations: (by location) sample at a least once per 92 days.

Columbia, AL.- (N-5)

Great Southern Paper Co. (SSE-3)

Ashford, AL. (WSW-8)

Control Stations:

Blakely, Ga. (NE-15)

Dothan, AL (W-18)

Neals Landing, FL. (SSE-18)

Iodine ' Continuous sampler operation Radiciodine canister with charcoal canister Analyze at least once Indicator Stations: collection performed once per 7 days for I-131.

per 7 days.

North Perimeter (N-0.8)

South Perimeter (SSE-1.0)

Plant Entrance - (WSW)-0.9 River Intake Structure (ESE-0.8)

Annual ENV Report /4 Page 1 of 5 l

i ..

o TABLE 2 (con d)

Types of samples and- Sampling Type and Frequency and of Sampling Imations . Analysis

'!: - (Distances Given in Miles) Collectics Frequency C - wtity stations::

Great Southern Paper Co.-(SSE-3)

Control Stations:~

Blakely, CA. J (NE-15)

Dothan, AL. (w-18)

Neals rWirwy, FL. (SSE-18)

Annual _in situ Ge(Li) & -ray c.amma Isotopic

- Soil '. Annually spectroscopy m asurements.

Indicator. Stations:-

1

" Six ' Stations along tie. plant

g~ perimeter '(NE-l.0, E-0.8, i l

- SSE-1.0, 55W-1.0, leSW-0.9, and 1eiK-0.8)

Community Stations:~

Columbia,IAL. (N-5)L.

Great l Southern Paper Co.(SSE-3)

! Ashford, AL. . (185N-8)

Control; Stations:-

.Blakely, - Ga. - (NE-15) .

Dothan,'Al. (W-18).

DIRECT RADIATION- At least once per 92 days c.amma dose Headout at least once per 92 days Annual ENV Report /4

'Page 2 of 5

.- = _ _ _ - -_- ._ - - . _. - _ - _ _ _ -

1 DBLE 2 (con'd) l Typesfof Samples I and. M 1ing. Type and Frequency .]

. Sampling Iocations: and of ,

-(Distances Given:in Miles) Collection Fregues y Analysis j Indicator I Stations: . l r

Y Sixteen stations, one in each meteorological i sector along the plant perimeter (N-0.8, j t - BE4E-0.9, NE-1.0, DEH? ,9, E-0.8, ESE-0.8,  ;

=

SE-1.1, SSE-1.0, S-1.0, SSN-1.0, SN-0.9, f f NSN-0.9, w-0.8, iest-0.8, NN-1.1, and 2005-0.9).

i

' Indicator:II (enemmutity) Stations: l t

Eighteen stations,,one-in each meteorological. i sector at' a distance of 4-5 miles -(laarA, l NE-4, ENE-4,L E-5, ESE-5, SE-5, SSE-3, . 5-5, _i SSN-4, SW-5, usN-4,- w-4, ieet-4, NN-4,1985-4, j

'and N-5). Additional stations located at .

WSW-8 and SW-1.2. . !t 9: ContrS1 Stations -

Blakely, Ga. (NE-15) I Neals Landing, Fl.-(SSE-18) l

Dothan,LAL..(W-18) i Dothan,' AL. (w-15).  !

1

. webb, AL. .:~ ;(WNW-11) - '!

Haleburg, AL.; (N-16) , [

1RTERBORNE  !

Surface water Cn=pacite taken with propor . Monthly <f===a isotopic .;

.tional semi-continuous M 1er,  : analysis of each composite .  !

_ Indicator Station: having a miniman sampling fre- sample. Trititan analysis .!

quency not exceeding two hours - of each composite sample j

. collected over; a period 131; days. .

..at least once per 92 days.  !

Great Southern Paper Co.,; j

_( 3 miles below plant -

' discharge,' River Mile-40)1  ;

Annual EN7 Report /4U , Page 3 of 5 i

r ,

m- ~ . . - -- . . . , . . __ -...n.--_ --

TAstz 2 (cm'd)

Types of Samples Type and Frequency and Sampling and of Sampling Incations Analysis (Distances Given in Miles) Collection Frequency Cor: trol Station:

Upstream of Andrews rock and Dam

(-3 miles above plant intake, River Mile-47)

Grab sample taken at least r - isotopic and tritium Ground Water. analyses of each sample once per 92 days.

once per quarter.

Indicator Station:

~ Great Southern Paper Co., Well (SSE-4)

Control Station:

Whatley Residence, well (SW-1.2)-

Grab sample taken at least. Gamma isotopic analysis River Sediment- of each sample twice once per 184 days.

per year.

Indicator Station:

Downstream of plant discharge

. at Smith's Bend (River Mile - 41)

Control Station

.

, Upstream of plant discharge at Andrews Inck & Den Reservoir (River Mile - 47)

Page 4 of 5 Annual DIV Report /4 l _. . _ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ . _

__c . _ _ _ _ _ . _..:. . . - _ _ . . . _ _ ..

_..__. i._ _ . , _ .

nBLE 2 (con'd)

Types of Samples Type and Frequency and Sangling and of Sampling Iocations Analysis (Distances Given in _ Miles) Collection Frequency INGESTICN Milk Lewis Dairy At least once per 16 days m = a isotopic and I-131 Avon, AL (WSN-14) analysis of each bi-weekly sample when animals are on pasture.

l Fish One sarple of the following m mm isotopic analysis Indicator Station:

species at least once per 184 on edible portions once days: 1. Game Fish per 184 days.

2. Bottom Feeding Fish g Downstream of plant discharge in vicinity of Smith's Bend (River Mile - 41)

Control Station:

Upstream of plant discharge in Andrews Lock & Dam Reservoir (River Mile - 47)

Grab sanple cut from green Ganssa isotopic analysis Forage forage at least once per 31 which includes I-131 days. analyses of each monthly Indicator Station: sanple.

North Perimeter (N-0.8)

South Perimeter (SSE-1.0)

Control Station:

Dothan, AL. (W-18) Page 5 of 5 Annual EIN Report /4

. _ _ _ _ _ = - _ .

f

'IABLE 3 q ut:.m.nCN CAPABILITIES EM E2NIIO@tENDE. SAMPLE MaLYSIS FOR FARLEY NUCIEAR PLAVI VAWES Em THE MINIrpt DCIECIABLE CWCENTRATIm(MDC)* **

Airborne Particulate Water or Gas Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis (pCi/1) (pCi/m") (pCi/kg. wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/kg. wet) (pCi/kg. dry)

Gross beta 4 0.01 ra fa la fa H-3 2000 ra ra la ra ra i Mn-54 15 ra 130 ra ra ra Fe-59 30 ra 260 ra ta rm Co-58, 60 15 ra 130 ra ta ra Zn-65 30 ra 250 ra ta fa Zr-95 30 ra ta ta ta ra t

26-95' 15 ra la ra In ra I-131 1* 0.07 ra 1 60 ra 1

-Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 '

Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-140 60 ra la 60 ra ra La-140 15 ra ta 15 ra ta Page 1 of 2

TABLE 3 (con'd)

'The MOC is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will be detected with 95% probability with 51 probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" '

signal.

For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):

MDC = 4.66 S, E V 2.22 Y exp (-Aot)

Where MDC is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as picoeurie per unit mass or volume).  !

S is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or oI the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute).

E is the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation).

V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume).

2.22 is the number of transformations per minute per picoeurie. j Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable). ,

A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular j radionuclide.

at is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting (for environmental samples, not plant effluent samples).

The value of S, used in the calculation of-the MDC for a detection system shall be based on the actual observed variance of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of the blank samples (as appropriate) rather than on an unverified theoretically predicted variance. In calculating the MDC for a radionuclide determined by gama-ray spectroccopy, the background shall include the typical contributions of other radionuclides normally present in the samples i (e.g., Potassium-40 in milk samples). Typical values of E, V, Y and at I shall be used in the calculations, b

The MDC's for Tritium, Gross beta, and Radiciodine were obtained using blank background (a priori), whereas, for gamma-ray spectroscopy actual sample backgrounds were used (a porteriori).

• MDC for drinking water, i

20 Pa@ 2 of 2 i i

l

i

~

, l i.: I i

3- N4 '

1-j .: s

,. REPORTING LEVELS FCR RADIOPL11vm COGCENIPATICMS IN DiVIBOGW2fDLL SAMPLES [

i:' <  !

+

i Airborne Particulate t

- .. Mater or Gay Fish Milk Food Products 11 Analysis. (pci/1) (pCIAm ) (pci/kg. wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/kg. wet) r; j .!

H-3 2 x 10'* NFL NFL NFL NFL t I - Mn-54 1 x 10' NA 3 x 10' NFL IE t

4 i! - Fe-59' 4 x 10* NPL 1 x 10' NFL NFL i.

Co-58 1 x 10' NPL 3 x 10' NFL ' NFL

!' Co-60 3 x ' 10* ' NFL . - 1 x 10' NFL NFL

!; Zn--65 '- 3 x 10*- NFL 2 x 10' NFL ' NFL 1

}>

Zr/16 [4x10' 2 NPi NFL NFL NFL j

r i%.~ I-131- 2 0.9 NFL 3 100

,I Cs-134 30- 10 1 x 10' 60- 1 x 10 5

i;

' Cs-137

'50 20 2'x'10' 70 2 x 10' I! 'Ba/La-140 2 x 10*' NFL 3 x 10*

NFL NA .

,il b .

- i

• For' drinking water samples.

[ -' ? Annual DW Heport/4(7) '

p

i e

h 4

k r.-

'L'Pl MET?3P4'*'*-- P w1' g-iM'v T .t- y-"EA-'O eM' ipr. pm'l ,. 4N.a ' f' P e .Jr'ra 't.7"-

i gM pi *

'9*M"-

-"%'a"9 X g -

w'!ne-

.'Y*' 44-- acP-t=^- 3yeM q$

M-'.'y -

-1r--c,.4 ei'y-y e yi-m y9-

. .~ _ , _ _ - - ._- . _ - -_- - _.

l I

TABLE 5

, SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DEVIATICX4S DURING 1990 Component Time Period Reason for Deviation / Comments Air Monitoring Station 1/23/90-2/6/90 Low air volume due to failed air 1601 totalizer; Totalizer replaced 2/4/90.

Air Monitoring Station 1/30/90-2/6/90 Low air volume due to failed motor; 1605 Motor replaced 2/0/90.

Air Monitoring Station 3/6/90-3/13/90 Low air flow rate; riow rate adjusted 0718 to 100 seth.

Air Monitoring Station 3/6/90-3/13/90 Low air volume due to a broken motor 1818 pulley; Pulley replaced 3/19/90.

Air Monitoring Station 3/6/90-3/13/90 Low air volume due to failed totalizer; 1601 Totalizer replaced 3/19/90.

Air Monitoring Station 3/13/90-3/27/90 Low air volume due to station being out 0701 of service as a result of the flooding of the area; Breaker was replaced 3/23/90.

Air Monitoring Station 3/21/90-3/27/90 Low air volume due to low flow rate; 0501 riow rate adjusted to 90 scfh.

Air Monitoring Station 3/21/90-3/27/90 Low air volume and high MDC due to a 1605 blown fuse; ruse replaced.

Fiver Water Sample - 3/31/90 Surface water background sample missing Andrews Lock & Dam for March, 1990 due to the flooding of the river.

Air Monitoring Station 4/10/90-4/17/90 Low air volume and high MDC due to a 1605 blown fuser ruse replaced.

Air Monitoring Station 4/24/90-5/1/90 Low air volume due to filter loading 0501 with dirt.

Air Monitoring Station 4/24/90-5/1/90 Low air volume due to failed motor; 1601 Motor replaced S/4/90.

Air Monitoring Station 4/24/90-5/8/90 Low air volume due to a blown fuse; 1605 ruse replaced.

Air Monitoring Station 5/1/90-5/8/90 Low air volume due to failed pump; 1601 Pump replaced 5/3/90.

l l

Annual DN Report /14 Page 1 of 3 22

.-. - - - - . . - - - - - . - . - - . . . ~ . . . - . . - - - . . . - - . --_.

i .

i l  :

d Component Time Period Reason for Deviation / Comments I

Air Monitoring Station 5/15/90-5/29/90 Low air volume due to faulty plug '

1605 receptacle and ground wire; Plug

, receptacle and ground wire replaced-5/25/90.

Air Monitoring Station 6/5/90-6/19/90 Low air volume due to filter loading 1605 with dirt.

Air Monitoring Station 6/12/-6/19/90 Low air volume due to dust loading of 0501 filter.

Air Monitoring Station 6/19/90-7/3/90 Low air volume and high MDC due to 1601 failed transformer; Transformer.

replaced 6/29/90.

TLD 1215 2nd Quarter, 1990 TLD fell from stand and damaged by '

lawn mower (reported as missing).

Air Monitoring Station 7/3/90-7/17/90 Low air volume due to mechanical 1218 problems; Plug receptacle and motor cable replaced 7/12/90.

Air Monitoring Station 7/31/90-87//90 Low air volume due to motor pulley off 1218 shaft; New motor and pulley lnstalled 8/9/90.

Air Monitoring Station 7/31/90-8/10/90' Low air volume due to a broken motor 1605 bearing; New motor and pulley installed 8/10/90. .

Air Monitoring Station 8/7/90-8/14/90 ~ Low air volume duelto dust loading 0501 of filter.

Air Monitoring Station 8/7/90-8/14/90- Low air volume due to broken motor .

1218 pulley; Pulley and fan belt replaced

• 8/9/90, i

Air Monitoring Station 8/7/90-8/21/90 Low air volume due to broken motor 1605 bearing; New motor and pulley replaced 8/9/90.

Air Monitoring Station- 8/28/90-9/4/90 Low air volume'due to broken motor- '

1605 pulley; Both motor and pump pulleys reworked 8/30/90.

Air Monitoring Station 10/9/90-10/16/90 -Sample missing due to excess paper 0703 obstructing air flow path; Paper .3 removed.

Air Monitoring Station 10/23/90-10/30-90 Low air volume due to oil leak

-1108- from pump; New pump and be1t-installed 10/28/90.: .

Annual ENV Report /14- Page-2 of 3. 'i 23 ,

- .2 _ w .. _ _ . - _ . . _ , _ . . - ._ - - - .

i Ccaponent Time Period Reason for Deviation /Corsnents rotage sample 1218 12/5/90 High MDC on background sample due to low volume; Volume low due to unavailability of adequate forage. ,

, forage Sample 1218 12/5/90 Sample missing due to unavailability of adequate forage.

Air Monitoring station 12/11/90-12/18/90 Low air volume due to blown fuse; ruse 1218 replaced.

Air Monitoring station 12/18/90-12/26/90 Low air volume-due'to blown-fuse;-ruse 0703 replaced.

TLD 1215 Annual, 1990 TLD was damaged by mower af ter it fell .

to ground from TLD stand. {

TLD 1311 Annual, 1990 TLD missing.

TLD 1404 Annual, 1990 TLD missing.

e i

r s

Annual ENV Report /14 Page 3 of 3

_ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ ____.____-m_ _. _ _ _ _ - . . _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . __ .. _ _ _ . .

7ABl.E 10'K)-01 AIRP.ORNE: TARTIClLATES' O!EkA110NAL PAnl0 ACTIVITY StH4ARY ,

JOSETH M. FARIFY Ntl H AR ti,Alff I.!CEEE N'1S. Nrf 2 A0 NPF 81100STON COUNTY ALABAMA

SUMMARY

REPORT FRCH 0101'O TO 123190 (A)

MED1tN DR ITftE AO I l A!L 101CATOR I INDICATOR lEATION i COMMUNITY I C0hTROL FATilWAY if(7tAL I I IFATIONS I WITH ll10EST ANNUAL MEAN I IEAtl0NS IIEATION SAMPLED INUMBERS OF i WHlNAL LEAN (C/D) l- -- - ------ - ------- ---- --I MEAN (C/0) i MEAN (C/D)

(UNIT OF IANAl.fSIS I HrC(P) (RAEE(C) l NAME I MEAN (C/D) i RANGE (C) 1 RANCE (C)

MEASUREMENT)lfERF0FMED l I l DISTANCE I RAN1E (C) 1 I 4

I I I IA W DIRECTION i l i AIR ICROSS 5151 . 002 I .010(205/206) IWEST TERIM. l .01)( 51/ 51)I .010(154/154) I .010(154/155)

FARTICUl.ATESIBETA i l( 0.001- 0.028) 10.9 Hl. NW l( 0.003- 0.028) 1( 0.001 0.033) )l( 0.004- 0.036)

(PC1/M"3) i I I I I I I I I I I I I I IBE-7 371 .010 i .026( 16/ 16) l I .029( 3/ 3)I .025( 9/ 9) 1 .026(12/12) l I i( 0.01R- 0.031) 1 I( 0.027-- 0.031I( 0.015- 0.041)I( 0.021- 0.035) l I I i i l i 10S-134 381 . 001 1 < 00 ( 0/ 16) i I i < Kr . ( 0/ 10)-I < hic ( 0/ 12) l I I I I I l i I I I I I I-105 137 3RI .001 1 < HlC ( 0/ 16) l I i < Hit ( 0/10) I < @C ( 0/12) i I I I I I I l l l l l l t 11-131 MI . 001 1 < KC ( 0/16) l I I < MDC ( 0/ 10) I < K C ( O!12) '

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I (A) No Ibntoutinn Anoratous Maasutomants piorlfd During This retiod, I (B) Hean Minimus Detectable Concentration CalculatMI ter Table 3 Of This Report.

(C) Mean and Range Of humber Of Measurerents )(ith Detectable Activity Only.

(D) Total Number of Measurements Taken.

25 -'

l 1

l 9 W,, a-,---7w, rg:--, =,5e,...q' r p.m 9 -

.ya. .cg> 2-yn, .--. - -p p 4 y e em y ,,7,_ y ., g a to-*y= ,_y

TABLE 19W02 A!RBORNB: 10 DINE - OTERATIONAL RAD 10 ACTIVITY SlMMARY l JOSErli M. FARLEY WlCLEAR PLAU LICENSE 105. Nrf 2 A0 NP"-8 Il0llSTON AUIRY ALABAMA StMMARY REPORT FROM 010190 TO 12.5193 (A)

EDilH OR ITYPE A 0 l IALLINDICATOR I IWICATOR uCATION I COMMUNITY l CONTROL FATINAY ITCffAL I i (EATIONS I WIT!I FIGHEST ANNUAL. KEAN I ItCATIONS IIKATION SAMPlfD INUMPERS OF i NOMINAL INEAN (C/D) l -- - -----~ ~----~~ ~ ~ --- I MF,AN (C/ D) i HEAN (C/D)

(trNIT Of IANALYSIS I WC(B) IRACE(C) l NAME I EAN (C/D) i RAWJE (C) l RACE (C)

HEASITEMEhi)lFERIUMED I I I DISTA)CE I RAEE (C) i I ,

1 I i LAO DIRECTION 1 I I AIR 10 DINE Il00lNF. 4111 .039 I ( KC ( 0/206) l I I < EC ( 0/ 51) I ( HIC ( 0/154)

(PCl/M"3) I i i l i I I I l l l t 1 i i

l l

l l

l

-l i

i l

t (A) No Nontoutine Anomalous Heasutomonts Ryorted During This feriod.

(B) Hean Minimum Detectable contentration Calculated rer Table 3 Of This Report.

(C) Mean and Range Of Nurner Of Measurements With Detectable Activity only, (D) Total Number of Hessurements iden; I

26

?

TABl.E 1990-03 E UERNAL RADIAtl0N - OPERAtl0NAL RADIDACTIVITY SlMMARY JOSEPH M. FARLEY N! CLEAR ILANT l.lCENSE 10S. NPT-2 AND NTF 8 Il00Ft0N COUlftY Al.ABAMA SlNMARY REPORT FROM 010193 70 123190 (A)

. EDllH OR ITYlE AND I lALL INDICATOR I INDICATOR 14 CAT 10N 1 COMMUNITY I C0hTROL FATEWAY ITlftAL i I !(CATIONS I klTil ill0 HEST ANNUAL EAN IllCATIONS I l/ CATION SAMPLED IN!'MBERS OF I 10MINE IMFAN (C/D) l-- - --- ----- - - - - - -- - -I MEAN (C/D) i EAN (C/D)

(UNIT OF IANALYSIS I MDC(R) IFACE(C) i NAE I MEAN (C/D) i RAE E (C) l RAEE (C)

MEASURFMENT)ll'ERFORED I i 1 DISTAICE I FANGE (C) 1 I l l l lAND DIRET10N I i l TLD-0VARTER10ROSS 1591 10.000 I 18.892( 64/ 64) lEAST TERIM. I 24.692( 4/ 4)I 15.773( 72/ 72) I 16.373( 23/ 23)

(MRAD) 10AMMA I i( 12.34- 28.14) 10.9 M1 ENE 1( 23.34- 28.14)l( 11.09- 22.23)lt 11.59- 21.84) i I i 1 1 I i i l I I i l 1 T1.D ANNUAL 10ROSS 371 10.000 1 60.255( 16/ 16) ISolttH FERlH. I 92.8'40( 1/ 1)l 48.016( 17/ 17) 1 51.040( 4/ 4)

(MRAD) 10AMMA i 1( 43. 8')- 42.89) 11.0 MI, S I l( 36.14- 56.14)l( 40.14- 64.84) l I I I l l -l T1.D ANNUAL,-EIGROSS 401 10.000 1 75.f06( 16/ 16) IS0irr!I tERIM. I 101.020( 1/ 1)I 62.942( 1R/ 18) l- 62.015( 6/- 6) i (MRAD) iGAMMA I l( 57.02- 101.02) 11.0 Mt. S I l( 51.52- 72.02)l( 47.26- 72.96)

I l i I I I I t

I l

(A) No Nonroutine Anomalous Measurenents Rerorted During This feriod.

(B) Mean Minimum Detectable Concentration Calculated ter Table 3 Of This Report.

(C) Mean and Range Of Norter Of Measurements With Detectable Activity Only.

(D) Total Nutter of Measurceents Taken.

(E) Sum Of Four Quarters For Comparative Purposes 27

- . - . - ~ . - - _ . . . . . . - . - - . - _ . _ - . _ - . - . . .. . . - . - .. .

i TABLE 19 % -04 MILK OffRATIONAL RAD 10APTIVITY SlHMARY

< J0FEril M, fARLEY NTLf.AR l'LANT l LICENST, OS. NTF 2 AND NPF 8 IIOUCTON COUVl? ALAPAMA SMRY REl' ORT FEf* 01019) 70 123190 (A)

MEDilN OR ITYPE AND l IALL INDICATOR I INDICATOP IOCATION I COMMUNITY l CONTROL FATHWAY ITOTAL i i ILCAT10NS I NITil lilGHEST ANNUAL MEAN Il0 CATIONS I LOCATION SAMPLED INLNBERS OF I plNAL IKEAN (C/D) l- ------------ ----- - - -- -- I MEAN (C/D) l NEAN (C/0)

(UNIT OF lANALYS!S I MDC(B) IRANGEiC) I hAME I MEAN (C/D) i RAEE (C) l RANGE (C)

MEAStREMErf)lPERF0PMED i i 1 DISTAEE I RAEE (C) l i i I I IAND DIRECTION I I I Milk IBA-140 261 44,230 1 I I I I ( MDC ( 0/26)

(PCl/L) I i i i i l l I I I l l I i 105-134 261 11,923 l l l l l < MIC ( 0/26) i I I I I I I I I I I I I I ICS-137 261 10,R84 I I I I I( MDC ( 0/ 26) l I I I I I I-1 -1 1 I I I I 11 131 - 261 .288 I I I I l - < MIC ( 0/ 26) 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I IK-40 261 105.769 I I I I i 1325,230( 26/ 26)

I I I I I I l( 705.00- 1620.00).

I I I I I I I ILA140 26l 9.423 I I I I I < MDC ( 0/ 26) l I I I i l i i i l i I I l

'l (A) No Nonroutine Anomalous Measurements Perorted During This Perini.

(B) Mean Minimum Detectable Concentration Calculated Ter Table 3 Of This Report.

(C) Mean and Range Of Nw.ber Of Measurtmente With Detectable Activity Only,

-(D) Total Naber of Mnaserements Taken.

' 28 1

. J.. _ _ , , _ _ _ _ _, _._.- . . _ . . ._. _ , . . _ - _ __ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ . . . . . . . . ,_ _ _ _

. - _ - - - - . - . - - . - ~ . _ - . - . - - - . .- .- - - --_ - _ .._ - _, - . -

TABLE 1990-05 VE0 ETAT 10N FORACE - OPERAT10NAL RADIDACTIVITY

SUMMARY

X6ETH M. FARLEY NUCl. EAR 01. ANT l.lCENSE N95. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 Il00STON COUNTY ALABAMA

SUMMARY

REPORT FROM 010190 70 123193 (A)

MED!llM OR ITYPE AND I lALLINDICATOR I INDICATOR IEATION I COMMUNITY l COVTROL FATHWAY ITOTAL i I [EAtl0NS I WITH HIGHER ANNUAL MEAN I LOCATIONS I LOCATION SAMPLED INUMPERS OF l NOMINAL IMEAN (C/D) l------- ---------- ------ --- I MEAN (C/D) l MEAN (C/D)

(lNIT OF IANALYSIS I HDC(B) IRAEE(C) i NAME I MEAN (C/D) l FA EE (C) l FA T E (C)

MEASUREMEYI)lPERFORMED I I I DISTAK E I RAEE (C) i l l i I IAND DIRECTION 1 1 I F0PAGE(E) LAC 228 51i10.000 1 196.000( 1/ 1) IS0lfrH PERIM. I 196.000( 1/ 1)I I (PCI/XG) l i 11.0 MI. SSE I I I WET I I I I i  ! l IBE 7 351 189.000 1 1841.54)( 24/ 24) IS0lffHFERIM. I 1564.000( 11/ 11)I l 2816.545( 11/ 11) i l l( 109.00 10 W .00) 11.0 MI, SSE l(109.00-10500.00) l l( 179.00-11100.00) i I I I I I I 1B1-214 31 43.666 i 97.000( 2/ 3) ISni'TH TERIM. I 97.000(-2/ 2)I I j

i  ! l( 96.00- 9A.00) 11.0 M1, SSE - l( 96.m ')8.00)I I i l I i l i l l l 105-134 341 22,500 1 < MDC 5 0/ 23) i I I I < MDC ( 0/ 11) l l 1 I I i i 1 j i l I i i l I l

10S 137 '15 1 19.571 1 56.(m( 1/ 24)  !!0lttil TERIM. - l 56.000(-1/ 111 i < MDC ( 0/ 11) l 1 1 I 11.0 MI. SSE I I I I I I I I I I 11 131 351 25.085 i < MlC ( 0/ 24) 1 I I I( MDC ( 0/11) l I I I I I I I I I i i i i 11'40 351195.428 I 4552.375( 24/ 24) INORTHPERIM. I4501,333(12/12)I I4320.000(10/11) i i 1( 741.00- 96d.0.00) 10.8 MI. N l(746.00 - 9640.00)I l( 1010.00 8460.00) i I I I i i l IfB 214 31 42.000 1 69.500( 2/ 3) ISOUTH FERIM. I 69.500( 2/ 2)I I I i -i( 54.00- 85.00)'.11.0 MI. SSE l( 54.00- 85.0011 I i i I I i 1 1 IFB-212 31 30.331 1 62.500( 2/ 3) IS0ltfHPERIM. I 85.000( 1/ 1)I I l

1 l l( 40,00- PA.00) 11.0 Pl. SCE i 1 l I  ! I l I i 1 l 171.-208 11 28.000 1 42.010( 1/ 1) li'OltfH PERIM. I 42.000( 1/ 1)I I i l i 11,0 MI. SSE I I I I I l i I I i 1

(A) No Nontoutine Anomalous Measurements Re pried During This Pertod. -

(B) Mean Minimun Detectable Concentration Calculated Per Table 3 Of This Report.

(C) Mean and itange Of N aber Of Measurements With Detectable Activity Only.

(D) Total Number of Measurements Taken.

(E) Maan Wet / Dry Ratio for 19'V) was 3.701 29

_ _, , , . . . - _ _ ~.. __ _ _ ;____,_..

_=- . - ..

0 TABLE 1990-06 SOIL - Ol'ERAtl0NAL DAD 10 ACTIVITY SlHMARY JOSErl! M, FARLEY NUCLEAR PLAki LICENSE f(JS. hTF-2 AND NPF-8 Il00STON COUNTY A!.ABAMA SlHMARY REPORT IWH 010193 70 123190 (A)

MFDILH OR ITYPE AND I lALL INDICATOR I INDICATOR LOCATION I COMMUNITY l CohTROL PATilWAY IT(RAL i l LOCAtl0NS I WITil HIGilEST ANNUAL MEAN I LOCATIONS I10 CAT 10N SAMPLED INUMBERS Of I NOMINAL. IMEAN (C/D) l -------- ~ ~ - ~ ~ ---- ~ ~ ~ l MEAN (C/ D ) i MEAN (C/D)

(UNIT Of IANALYSIS I MDC(B) IRANCR(C) i NAME I EAN (C/li) i RANGE (C) i RANCE (C)

MEASUREMElft)lPERFORMED I I I DISTANCE I RANCE (N I I I I I LAND DIRECTION i I i P

Solb- IAC-228 121 324.333 11766,285( 7/ 7) lEAST PERIM, l 3136,000( 1/ l')I 1188,000( 3/ Si i 1657,000( 2/ 2)

IN SITU i i l( 1026.00- 3136,00) 10.9 M1. ENE -l l( 1038.00- 1410.00)l( 1222.00 2092.00)

(TCl/KO-DRY)I I I -l i I I I I I I I I i 151 212 121 803.000 1 1623,500( 6/ 7) IS0VTH FERIM, 1 2750,000( 1/ 1)I 900,500( 2/ 3) I 1446.000( 1/ 2)-

l l l( 806.00- 2750,00) 11,0 MI, S  ; l( 735,00-1066.00)1 I I I I I I I IBI-214 121 162.250 1 1330,571( 7/ *i) Ih0lfrilTERIM, t 2112.000( 1/ 1)I 948.6H( 3/ 3) I 1130 500( ' 2/ 2) ,

I i 1( 912,00 2112.00) 11.0 M1, S i l( 781.00 1099,00)l( 828,00+ 1433,00) '

I I I I- 1 I I 105-137 121 41,916 1 128.857( 7/ 7) l I 295,000( 1/ 1)I 154,666( 3/-3)I 155.000( 2/ 2) i I I( 58,00- 295.00) i I I( -79.00- 266,00)I( 155,00- 155.00) l I I I i l -l IK-40 121 480,333 1 6288,714( 7/ 7) IS0lfri' PERlW. 115810.000( 1/ 1)I 1483,000( 3/ 3) I 2626,000( 2/ 2).

I I l( 1109.00-15810.00) 11,0 Mi. S I l( 878.00-2160,00)l(1508,00-3744.00) l I I l -1 -l i IfB-214 121 272.166 1 1302,142( 7/ 7) lEAST PERIM, i 22L3.000( 1/ 1)I 1091,666( 3/ 3) i 1617,500( 2/ 2)

I I l( 786.00- 2203.00) 10.9 MI, ENE i l( bis # r 129i.00)l( 1032.00- 2203.00) l I I I I I I IFB 212 121 295.000 1 1487.428( 7/ 7) lEAST FERIM, 1-2504.000( 1/ 1)I 1002,666( 3/- 3) i 1737.500( 2/ 2) i i 1( 591.00- 2504.00) 10.9 Mt. ENE l' l( 734,00- 1175.00)l( 1414.00- 2061,00) l I I I I I I ITL 208 121 113.166 I 654,142( 7/ 7) IS0tTTH PERIM. I 1130,000( 1/ 1)I 334.000( 3/ 3) 1 531,000( 2/ -2) l l 1( 303.00- 1130.00) 11,0 MI, S I l('305.00- 537,00)l( 410,00- 668,00) '

I I I I I l- l (A) No Nonroottne Anrealous Measurements Reported During This Perial.

(B) Mean Minimum Datictable Concentration Calculated For Table 3 Of This Report.-

(C) Mean and Range O' Number Of Measurements With Detectable Activity Only, (D) Total Number of Measurements Taken, 30

TABLE 1990-07 UATERPORNE: SURFACE UATER - OPERAtl0NAlf RADIDACTIVITY SINHARY JOSEPH H. FARLEY NICLEAR FI,AU 1,1 CENSE NOS, NPF-2 AND NPF-8 HOUSTON COUUY ALABAHA

SUMMARY

REN)RT FROM 010190 TO 1231% (A)

HEDIUM OR ITYTE AND I lALL INDICATOR I INDICATOR LOCATION-- l COHHUNITY l CONTROL PATHWAY ITUTAL I  ! LOCATIONS i WITH lilGilEST ANNUAL HEAN Il0 CAT 10NS Il0 CATION ,

SAMPLED INUMBERS Of i NDHINAL IMEAN (C/D) l ------- --- --- --------------I MEAN (C/D) i HEAN (C/05 l

(UNIT Of LANAI,YSIS I KC(B) IRANGE(C) i NAME I MEAN (C/D) l RANJE (C) l RANGE (C)

MEASUREMEU)lPERFORMED I I I DISTANCE I RANCE (C) i I j i l I LAND DIRECTION I I I SURFACE ITRITilH 81' % ,000 1 166.000( 3/ 4) 10000 1 166.000( 3/ 3)I I < HDC ( 0/ 4)

WATER RIVER I I l( 112,00- 208.00) IRIVER Hl. 40 1( 112.00- 208.00)I t (PCl/L) l I I I I I I I I I l I I I IBA-140 231 15,521 I( HDC ( 0/ 12) l I I i < HDC ( 0/11) F I I I I I l l l l 1 1 I I i 105 134 231 4.173 1 < HDC ( O! 12) l I I I t KC ( 0/ 11)- I I I I I I I I I I i i l l i 105-137 231 3,739 i < HDC ( 0/ 12) l I I I < HIC ( 0/ 11)-

1 I I I I I I I I I I I i i 1C0-58 231 3.652 I ( HDC ( 0/ 12) i I I I ( HDC ( 0/ 11) l I I i  ! I I I l i I I I I lC0-60 231 3,000 l < HDC ( 0/ 12) l I I i < HDC ( 0/ 11) 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IFE-59 231 6,478 1 < HDC ( 0/ 12) l I I 1 ( HDC ( 0/11) i I I I I I I I I I l l l l ILA-140 231 3,086 I ( HDC ( 0/ 12) l I I i < HDC ( 0/ 11) ,

I I I 1- 1 i 'l I I I I I I I INN-54 221 3,727 l < HDC ( 0/ 12) I I .l- I < HDC ( 0/10) i I I I I I I i i l I I i l INB 95 231 3,695 1 < HDC ( 0/ 12) I ~l I i < HIC ( 0/11)

I I- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 17N-65 231 7,391 l < HDC (- 0/ 12) I .I I I < HDC ( 0/ 11) f I i l 1- I l-1 I l' l I l  !

IZR-95 231 6.478 1 < KX' ( 0/ 12) 1 1 I i < HDC - ' ( 0/11) l I i 1: i I I I l l l- 1- I -I 31-1

-TABLP. 1990-08 UATERBORNE: 0%)UND WATER - 0FERAT10NAL RADIDACTIVITY

SUMMARY

JOCEPil H. FARLEY NIELEAR l'LAKT LICENSE NOS. NPF 2 AND NPF-8 il00STON COUNTY ALABAMA

SUMMARY

REPORT FROM 010190 TO 123190 (A)

EDIUM OR ITYFBAND I lAlL INDICATOR I INDICATOR 10 CAT 10N .1 COMMUNITY I C0hTROL PATirWAY IT0iAL I I IICAtl0NS I WITli HlGEST ANN 11AL EAN IIOCATIONS IIOCATION SAMPLED th'JHBERS OF l NOMINAL iMEAN (C/D) l --- --- ---- - ~ - ------- - ------ -- -- I EA N (C / Di l MEAN C/D)

(UNIT of IANALYSIS I MC(B) IRANCE(C) i NAE I EAN (C/D) l RA)CE (C) l RANGE (C)

EASUREMEhillFERF0MD i i i DISTANCE I RANGE (C) i I I I i LAND DIRECTION I I I GROUND ITRITIUM 4' 105.000 1 < HDC ( 0/ 2) l I I I < WC ( 0/ 2)

WATER ELL I I I I I I I (FCl/h) l I I I I I I I I I i i l i IBA-140 81 15.750 I < KC ( 0/ 4) l I i 1. < HDC ' ( 0/ 4)

I I I I I I I I I I I i i l 105-134 81 4.125 1 < KC ( 0/ 4) I I I i < HDC ( 0/ 4) ~

l i I .I I I I l i I I i l i ICS-137 81 3.875 I < KC ( 0/ 4) l- 1 I I < HDC ( 0/ 4)'

I ) i I I I I I I I I .I I I 100-58 81 3.625 1 < MDC ( 0/ 4) l I I l < HDC ( 0/ 4) i I I I I I I I I i i I i l 100 60 81 3.250 1 ('HDC ( 0/ 4) i I I I < HDC ( 0, 4) r i i l I i l i l I i l I I I IFE-59 81 7,000 I < MDC ( 0/ 4) 1- 1 I l < KC ( 0/ 4) i I I I I i i l i I i l i l 11-131 81 .288 i < HDC ( 0/ 4) i I I l < HDC ( 0/ 4)

I i i l I i l l I i i l I i s ILA 140 81 2,750 1 < KC ( O! 4) l I I I < Hnc .( Ol 4) i I I i 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I IMN54 81 3.285 i < HDC ( 0/ 4) I I I i < HDC ( 0/ 4) l I I I I I i 1 1 1 .I I i i lE 95 81 4.000 1 < HDC ( 0/ 4) I l- 1. I < HDC ( 0/ 4)-

1 I I l i I .I I I I ( l -1 I IZN 65 81 8.125 l < MDC ( 0/ 4) l I' .I I < HDC ( -0/- 4) h l I I I I i 1 4 I I l 1. I I I I

32

O TABLE '1990 08 WATERP.0RNE: CROUND WATER - OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY

SUMMARY

l JOCEFl! M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS hTF-2 AND NTF-8 Il00STON COUhTY A!ABAMA SIMMARY REPORT FROM 010190 TO 123190 (A)

HEDILH OD ITYPE AND l IAl,L INDICATOR I IN91CATOR LOCAtl0N I COMMUNITY l CONTROL .

PATilWAY IT(RAI, I I IDCATIONS I WITil H10i!EST ANNUAL MEAN Il0 CATIONS I 10CAtl0N SAMPLED IN11HBERS OF I NnHINAI, IMEAN (C/D) l ------ ------- ~ ~ + -- ---- ~ ~ ~ l MEAN (C/D) i HEAN (C/D)

(Unit of IANALYSIS I MDC(B) IRANGE(C) i NAME I MEAN (C/0) l RANr;E (C)- 1 RA*;E (C)

HEASUPEMENT)lPERFORMED I I I DISTANCE I RANGE (C) l I I I I LAND DIRECTION I I I i GROUND IZR-95 81 6.875 l < HDC ( 0/ 4) i I I  ! ( HD0 ( 0/ 4)

WATER WELL i i I i l i I (PCl/L) i I I I I l i i i I I i l I i

i i

(A) No Nonroutine Anm alous Heasurements Repnted During This Period.

(B) Hean Minimum Detectable Concentration Calculated Per Table 3 Of This Report, (C) Hean and Range Of Numter of Measurerents With Detectable Activity Only.

(D) Total Number of Measurements Taken.

33

1 AtlS 1G-01

. SEDM!rf. AlVE2 - OPERAT10 PAL TjiD10AC11YlTY EIMMARY JofMPE H. FARLEY NUCLEAR fil.Nf LICENSE NOS. NFF 2 AND NPf-8 IIOUSTON CCUhTY ALABAMA Sl#%VY REFORT FROH 010100 TO !?3190 -(A)

HEDlVM OR ITYPE AND I lALL INDICATOR i !NDICATOR lE ATION l COMHitN!TY I CONTROL PATHWAY llVTAL I I IEATIONS I WITS l'10'IEST ANNUAL. MEAN IIIIATIONS IIEAtl0N SAMPLED IH'MERS Of f NnHINM, IMEAN (C/0) l ----- --- -- -- --- ---------- I MEAN (C/D) l'HEAN (0/D)

(tidl? Of IANALYSIS I HDC(f) IRANGE(C) i NAS I MEAN (C/D) i RANGE (C) i RANGE (C)

MFASUhMlTillFEKf0RMED I I I DISTAK E I RANGE (C) I I I I I LAND DIRECTION I I I SfhlM9ff- IAC-228 41 148.000 1 12CO.000( 2/ 2) IEMITR'S BEND 1 1200.000( 2/ 2)! I 1555.000( 2/ 2)

RIVER I I l( 9(X).00- 1500.00) IRIV.MI. 41-42 ft900.00 - 1500.00)I l( 1130.00- 194).00)

(""l/KG-DRY)i i 1 l i I I I i i l i l I lisI-212 il 584.750 11445.000( 2/ 2) ISMITR'S BEND 1 1415.000( 2/ 2)I I 1825.000( 2/ 2) i i 1( 1100.00- 17'X).('0) I 1( 1100.00-1790.00)I 10 1491.00- 2160.00)-

1 I I I I I i 1RI 214 il 81.5(O 1 637.00)( 2/ 2) IFMITH'S bD.0 1 031.000( 2/ 2)I I M1.Nio( 2/ 2) i i 1( 561.00- 713.00) I 1( 561.00 713.00)!  !( - 547 //h 10R00) i I I I i 1 -!-

10S 134 41 44 750 1 < MN ( 0/ 2) i I I I < HM ( 0/ 2) l I I I 'l i I I I I I I I I 10S-137 41 39.750 i < HDC ( 01 26  ! I I i < HDC ( 0/ 2) i I I I I I I I I I I I i 1.

IK-40 41 305.000 1 267b,000( 2/ 2) ISMITH'S BEND 1 2675.000( 2/ 2)I I 2100.000( 2/ 2) l I l( 1930.00- 3420.00) i 1( 1930.00-3120.00)I l( 1970.00- 2230.00) i I I I I I I IPB-214 41 86.230 1 643,000( 21 2) ISHITH'S BEND 1 643,000( 2/ 2)I I M6.500( 2/ 2) l I l( 568.00- 718.00) I  !(. 568.00- 718.00)I l( 573.00- 1120.00) l I I I I I- 1 IFB 212 41 81.250 1 700.000( 1/ 2) ISNIfH'S F911) l 790,000( 1/. 1)] I 1139.500( 2/ 2) i I I I I I i( 819.00- 144),00) l I I I I I I IRA-22/> 2l 520.rth 1 '186.m0( 1/ 1) ISMIT!!'E SHID. I 7% CON 1/ !)I  : 7'M.0'U( 1/ 1)

I i i i i ~t i

~

I I I I i  !- 1 ITic208 41 47,750 1 435.500( 2/ 2) IGMITl!~S BEND I 435.500t 2/'2)1 l 553.V10( 2i 2) i i 1( 274.00- 597.00) I st( 274.00- SW. Coll l( 416.00- 691.fC)

i. I I I I i i- 1 4

l (A) Ilo Nontoutine Arm!ces Measurements Rmrted During Thli fettexl.

(B) Hean Hinlm Detectable Concentrattor. Calculated Enr Table 3 Of This Regott.

(C) Mean and Range Of Number Of Heasureeents With Detectable Act.tvity Ortly.

(D) Total N

• r of Measur e nts Taken.

34 J , - . , , , ,n - , , - . . - - - --

.y , - ,

e l TABLE 1910-10 FISih RIVER (CAMS) OPERATIONAL RADIDACTIVITY

SUMMARY

I JOSETE H. FARLEY NIELEAR PLANT i LICENSE 10S. NPF 2 AND NPF-8 HOUSTON COUhiY ALABAMA i

SUMMARY

REPORT FROM 010]90 TO 123190 (A) I EDilM OR ITYPE AND I lALL INDICATOR I INDICATOR LOCAfl0N I COMMUNITY I C0KIROL PATHWAY if(HAl, i I l/ CATIONS I WITil filGHEST ANN 1]AL EAN Il.0 CAT 10NS i LOCATION SAMPLED INUMBERS OF I IDMINAL IMEAN (C/D) l- --- ----- --- -------------I MEAN (C/D) l EAN (C/0)

(UNIT Of lANALYSIS I MDC(B) IRAEE(C) i NAME I MEAN (C/D) l RANCE (C) i RANGE (C)

MEASUREMEVI')!FERFORMED I I I DISTA)CE I RAW B (C). I I I I I LAND DIRfCTION I I I FISH-CAME 1C5-134 41 25.500 1 < HDC ( 0/ 2) l I I l < MDC '( 0/ 2)

(PCl/KG) i l i l i i i WET TISSUE I i i l I i l i I I I I I I ICS-137 41 24.000 1 28.000( 1/ 2) ISMITH'S bel 0 1 28.000( 1/ 1)l I < MDC ( 0/ 2) -

1 I I IRIV.MI.41-42 I I I I I I I I I I ICO-M 41 26,250 1 < MDC ( 0/ 2) i I I I < MIC ( 0/ 2) l I I I I I I I I I I i l i IC0-60 41 23,000 l < MDC ( 0/ 2) i i i l < MDC ( 0/ 2) l I I I I I I I I I I I I l IFE-59 41 55.500 1 < MDC ( 0/ 2) i I I I < HDC ( 0/ 2)

! I I i i l l I I i I i I I IK-40 41 161.500 1 3010.000( 2/ 2) ISMITil'S FEND I 3010.000( 2/ 2)) l 3420.000( 2/-2)

I  !  !( 2880,00- 3140,00) i I( 2880.00 3140.00)i I( 3000,00- 3840,00) l I I I I l~ l IMN 54 41 23.250 1 < KC ( 0/ 2) l I I l < MFC ( 0/ 2) l l 1 1 1 1 -1 I I I I I I I IZN 65 41 53,000 1 < KC ( 0/ 2) i I l I( HDC ( 0/-2) l l l l l 1 l l-  !

I I i l l I I-i (A) No Nontoutine Anomalous Measurements Ramrted During This Period.

(B) Mean Minimum Detectable ccncentration Calculated Per Table 3 Of This Remtt, (C) Mean and Range Of Number Of Haasurements With Detectable Activity Only,

-(D) Total Number of Measurements Taken, 1

35 l

l

4 v TABLE .1990-11 FISH: RIVER (PHITOM FEEDING) 00CRAtl0NAL PAD 10ACTIYlTY

SUMMARY

l JOSErli M. FARLEY NUCLSAR PLARI l LICENSE NOS. NPF 2 AND hTF 8 HolETON COURrY ALABAMA l

SUMMARY

REPORT FROM 010190 to 123190 (Al l

MEDIUM OR ITYPE AND I lALLINDICATOR I INDICATOR LOCA110N I COMMUNITY l C0KTROL PATINAY ITUTAL i I IOCATIONS l WITH HlCHEL't ANNUAL HEAN IIOCATIONS I INATION SAMPLFD INUMBERS OF I )DHINAL IMEAN (C/D) l----------------------- ---------I MEAN (C/D) 1 MEAN (C/D)

(UNIT Of IANALYSIS IIOC(E) l RANGE (C) l NAME I MEAN (C/D) i RANGE (C) l RANGE (C)

MEASUREMF)Tf)lPERFORMED I I I DISTA)EE I KANCE (C) 1 I I I I LAND DIRECT!ON I I i FISH (BUTTOMICS-134 41 26,500. I < HDC ( 0/ 2) i I I I < HDC ( 0/ 2)

FEEDING) i I l i I I I (PCl/KG) i I I I I I I WET TISSUE I I I I I I I ICS-137 41 25.500 1 < hDC ( 0/ 2) l I I i < HDC ( 0/ 2) i I I i l i l i I I I i l i 100 58 di 25,750 I( HDC ( O! 2) I  ! I I( KE ( 0/ - ?)

l i I I ,

I I I I I I l l I i 100-60 41 26.750 1 < MDC ( 0/ 2) I i l i < MDC ( 0/ 2) 1 I I I I i i I I I I I I i IFE-59 41 63.750 i < MDC ( O! 2) I l i I < HDC ( 0/ 2) i I I i l i I I I I I I l l IK-40 41 220,000 1 2500,000( 2/ 2) ISMITH'S BEND -l 2500,000f 2/ 2)I I 3240,000( 2/ 2) i I 1( 2320.00- 2680.00) IRIV,Hl. 41-42 l( 2320,00 2680,00)I (( 2710.00- 3770,00) l i l i =l l l IMN-54 41 24,500 1 < KE ( 0/ 2) l I I i < HDC ( 0/ 2) 1 I i l' I l l l l 1 I i l l IZN-65 41 56,750 I < HDC ( 0/ 2) I i i I < HDC ( 0/ 2) l I I I I I i i l i i i l I (A) No Iberoutine A'icealous Heasurements Ferorted During This Period.

(B) Mean Minimon Detectable Concentrat ton Calculated Per Table 3 Of This Report.

(C) Hean and Fanoo Of Nurter of Weacurements With Detectable Activity Only, (D) Total Number of Heasucceents Taken. _

i 36 l

l -

T' ATTACHMDff l' IAND USE SURVEY FOR' RADIOIDGICAL ENVIRONMDfrAL MONI'!ORING PROGRAM JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PIMir l JUNE 9, 1990 his Land Use Survey was performed to meet the requirements of the Parley Units 1 and 2 Technical Specifications, section 3.12.2 and 4.12.2.

A. Houston County, Alabama Lamar Nichols, Houston County Livestock Agent, was contacted for the purJose of reviewing known locations of milk animals in the county.

He (new of no individual milk cows in the county. Mr. homas Dean of Gordon, AL, still has milk goats. His residence is located in sector 08, 6 miles from FNP. %ere are goats located in sector 10, SW, owned by the Rathels. %e goats are not being milked.

A house-to-house canvas of Alabama residents in a five-mile radius of the plant was conducted along Highways 95 and 52, Houston County i Roads 42, 33, 75 and the interconnecting. light-duty _ roads. No milk animals were located. Individuals interviewed weret Mrs. Gilbert, Mr. Respress, Lyteasa Ryals, Lois Brown, Bertha Stewart, Mrs. Marvin Hoomes, and Anne Rathel.

Simultaneous with the milk animal survey, the nearest resident in each meteorological sector was identified. There were no new residents found.

B. Early County, Georgia Mr. Micky Fouracres, Early County Extension Agent, was contacted-to-determine if any milk animals were currently _present in the county.

He knew of no individual milk animals nor~ dairies in Early. County..

A house-tc>-house canvas of residents in the area across the --

l Chattahoochee River east.of Farley Nuclear Plant. revealed several goats in sectors 5, ESE r, 6, SE. We goats were:not being milked.  !

here were no milk cows located. We census of Georgia residents-was conducted along Highways 62 and 370, Early County Roads 219,.

239, 140 and the interconnecting light-duty roads. -Individuals interviewed were Mr. Tony Knighton and Mrs. Mary Allums.

Simultaneous with the milk animal' survey, the nearest resident in ,

each meteorological sector:was_ identified. No new residences were- -

found. 3 C. Results and Conclusions -;

he results of the Land Use survey are shown in Table ~l of Attachment 1. he survey located milk goats 6 miles'from FNP;.

however, no action is recuired for animals located outside a 5 mile radius. . herefore, base 6 on the rurvey results, no' change in_the present milk sampling program is required.

'l i

Annual ENV Report /6 37

• 4' e w-- 1w- m--w-t4--v m--- a v t- se *  %^we ' ui-wiA.'s- 4rie^+w e wev tw*T-4"M'w-F -^PG

i e TABLE 1 OF ATTACHMNT 1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLFAR PLANT ,

LAND USE SURVEY JUNE 9,1990

. i (DISTANCE MILES 10 NEAREST)

, RADIAL SEC70RS (22.5 DEGREES) RESIDOff MILK ANIMAL North Northeast (01) 2.5 >5 Northeast (02) 2.4 >5 ,

East Northeast (03) 2.4 >5 East (04) 2.8 >5 Eart Southeast (05) 2.8 >5 Southeast (06) 3.4 >5 South Southeast (07) >5 >5 South (08) 4.3 >5 South Southwest (09) 2.9 ' >5 Southwest (10) 1.2 > 5.

West Southwest (11) 2.4 >5 West (12) 1.3 > 5-West Northwest (13) 2.1 >5 Northwest (14) 1.5 >5 North Northwest (15) 2.0- >5 North (16) 2.6 >5 Annual DN Report /6 38' l

_ _ --_ - ___- - _- _