ML20069A759: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | ||
Expert Evaluation Team on the Concerns Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant Evaluation Plan Team composition: | |||
Team Lead - David Skeen (NRC Office of International Programs) | |||
Deputy Team Lead - Theresa Clark (NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards) | |||
Team Members: | |||
Dr. Yueh-Li (Renee) Li (NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation) - pipe rupture and technical review process expert Suzanne Dennis (NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research) - risk analysis expert, particularly hazard impacts Brian Harris (NRC Office of the General Counsel) - legal expert Steve Nanney (Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration) - pipeline safety expert Dr. Anay Luketa (Sandia National Laboratories) - natural gas modeling expert Dr. Chris LaFleur (Sandia National Laboratories) - fire risk expert Areas of review: | |||
: 1. Conclusions of NRC safety analysis related to inspection regarding Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59, Changes, tests, and experiments, for Indian Point, including: | |||
: a. Analyses by Entergy and NRC associated with 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation | |||
: b. Application of analysis to NRC inspection | |||
: c. Application of analysis to FERC pipeline approval (environmental impact statement and approval order) | |||
: 2. Conclusions regarding enforcement petition under 10 CFR 2.206, Requests for action under this subpart, regarding gas pipelines at Indian Point, including: | |||
: a. Handling of additional information provided as part of 10 CFR 2.206 process | |||
: b. NRC decision regarding petition | |||
: 3. Agency practices or procedures relevant to the issues raised in the NRC Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Event Inquiry, including practices and procedures for: | |||
: a. Obtaining expert advice in support of inspections | |||
: b. Cooperation with other federal agencies in environmental reviews | |||
: c. Conducting confirmatory calculations | |||
: d. Assuring quality of NRC analyses and reviews March 9, 2020 | |||
Approach to evaluation: | |||
The team will: | |||
* review documents relevant to the areas of review | |||
* interview NRC staff involved in the safety analysis and petition reviews being reconsidered as part of the evaluation | |||
* as appropriate, interview outside parties | |||
* as appropriate, coordinate with relevant Federal and state agencies | |||
* as appropriate, consult with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards | |||
* develop conclusions regarding areas of review Milestones: | |||
* Briefing to EDO on any significant issues regarding agency procedures and practices - | |||
3/18/2020 | |||
* Final report due from EDO to Commission (45 days from Chairmans tasking) - 4/9/2020}} |
Latest revision as of 18:48, 28 August 2020
ML20069A759 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Indian Point |
Issue date: | 03/09/2020 |
From: | NRC/EDO |
To: | |
Clark T | |
References | |
Download: ML20069A759 (2) | |
Text
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Expert Evaluation Team on the Concerns Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant Evaluation Plan Team composition:
Team Lead - David Skeen (NRC Office of International Programs)
Deputy Team Lead - Theresa Clark (NRC Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards)
Team Members:
Dr. Yueh-Li (Renee) Li (NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation) - pipe rupture and technical review process expert Suzanne Dennis (NRC Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research) - risk analysis expert, particularly hazard impacts Brian Harris (NRC Office of the General Counsel) - legal expert Steve Nanney (Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration) - pipeline safety expert Dr. Anay Luketa (Sandia National Laboratories) - natural gas modeling expert Dr. Chris LaFleur (Sandia National Laboratories) - fire risk expert Areas of review:
- 1. Conclusions of NRC safety analysis related to inspection regarding Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.59, Changes, tests, and experiments, for Indian Point, including:
- a. Analyses by Entergy and NRC associated with 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation
- b. Application of analysis to NRC inspection
- c. Application of analysis to FERC pipeline approval (environmental impact statement and approval order)
- 2. Conclusions regarding enforcement petition under 10 CFR 2.206, Requests for action under this subpart, regarding gas pipelines at Indian Point, including:
- a. Handling of additional information provided as part of 10 CFR 2.206 process
- b. NRC decision regarding petition
- 3. Agency practices or procedures relevant to the issues raised in the NRC Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Event Inquiry, including practices and procedures for:
- a. Obtaining expert advice in support of inspections
- b. Cooperation with other federal agencies in environmental reviews
- c. Conducting confirmatory calculations
- d. Assuring quality of NRC analyses and reviews March 9, 2020
Approach to evaluation:
The team will:
- review documents relevant to the areas of review
- interview NRC staff involved in the safety analysis and petition reviews being reconsidered as part of the evaluation
- as appropriate, interview outside parties
- as appropriate, coordinate with relevant Federal and state agencies
- as appropriate, consult with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
- develop conclusions regarding areas of review Milestones:
- Briefing to EDO on any significant issues regarding agency procedures and practices -
3/18/2020
- Final report due from EDO to Commission (45 days from Chairmans tasking) - 4/9/2020