CP-201900155, Decommissioning Report: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:&TXu
{{#Wiki_filter:CP-201900155 TXX-19032 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001  
                                                -.., energy I      m Luminant Thomas P. McCool Site Vice President Luminant P.O. Box 1002 6322 North FM 56 Glen Rose, TX 76043 o 254.897.6042 CP-201900155 TXX-19032 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission                                                           Ref 10 CFR 50.75(f)
&TXu I m
ATIN: Document Control Desk                                                                       10 CFR 72.30(c)
-.., energy Luminant 3/27/2019  
Washington, DC 20555-0001 3/27/2019


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP)
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP)
Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-445 and 72-74 Decommissioning Report Reference     1. Vistra Operations Company LLC letter logged TXX-17035, from T. Hope to the NRC, "Decommissioning Report," dated March 30, 2017 (ADAMS No. ML17094A247)
Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-445 and 72-74 Decommissioning Report Thomas P. McCool Site Vice President Luminant P.O. Box 1002 6322 North FM 56 Glen Rose, TX 76043 o 254.897.6042 Ref 10 CFR 50.75(f) 10 CFR 72.30(c)
Reference
: 1. Vistra Operations Company LLC letter logged TXX-17035, from T. Hope to the N RC, "Decommissioning Report," dated March 30, 2017 (ADAMS No. ML17094A247)  


==Dear Sir or Madam:==
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
Attached is the biennial decommissioning report for Comanche Peak'Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Units 1 and 2, prepared and submitted by Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo / operator) pursuant to 10CFR50.75(f) and 10CFR72.30(c). Comanche Peak Power Company LLC (CP PowerCo / owner) is an unregulated utility and therefore does not meet the definition of an electric utility as defined by 10CFR50.2. The recovery of decommissioning funds for the eventual decommissioning of CPNPP Units 1 and 2 is assured through the collection of a non-bypassable charge which is subsequently contributed to an external trust.
Attached is the biennial decommissioning report for Comanche Peak'Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Units 1 and 2, prepared and submitted by Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo / operator) pursuant to 10CFR50.75(f) and 10CFR72.30(c). Comanche Peak Power Company LLC (CP PowerCo / owner) is an unregulated utility and therefore does not meet the definition of an electric utility as defined by 10CFR50.2. The recovery of decommissioning funds for the eventual decommissioning of CPNPP Units 1 and 2 is assured through the collection of a non-bypassable charge which is subsequently contributed to an external trust.
The applicable sections of the citation (e.g., an Order by the rate-regulatory authority) by the regulatory authority that allows for the collection of non-bypassable charges established for the collection of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) is provided below.
The applicable sections of the citation (e.g., an Order by the rate-regulatory authority) by the regulatory authority that allows for the collection of non-bypassable charges established for the collection of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) is provided below.
The distribution utility will collect from customers and the generation company will contribute all funds collected to the decommissioning trust fund:
The distribution utility will collect from customers and the generation company will contribute all funds collected to the decommissioning trust fund:
* Enclosure to TXX-17035 (Reference 1), Public Utility Commission ofTexas (PUCT) Order dated             /
Enclosure to TXX-17035 (Reference 1), Public Utility Commission ofTexas (PUCT) Order dated  
November 6, 2015, page 3 of 7, paragraph #9.                                                 Ab/)
/
                                                                                                              /./'1552-/p tv!UL 6555 SIERRA DRIVE         IRVING, TEXAS 75039         0214-812-4600     VISTRAENERGY.COM
November 6, 2015, page 3 of 7, paragraph #9.
Ab/)
6555 SIERRA DRIVE IRVING, TEXAS 75039 0214-812-4600 VISTRAENERGY.COM  
/./'1552-/p tv!UL


TXX-19032 Page 2 of 2 The annual collection rate for each unit:
TXX-19032 Page 2 of 2 The annual collection rate for each unit:
* Enclosure to TXX-17035, Annual Projected Funding Requirement, 2015 Funding Analysis, Exhibit 8RF-4, Page 5 of 5.
Enclosure to TXX-17035, Annual Projected Funding Requirement, 2015 Funding Analysis, Exhibit 8RF-4, Page 5 of 5.
* Enclosure to TXX-17035, PUCT Order dated November 6, 2015, Page 6 of 7, paragraph #2 of Section IV.
Enclosure to TXX-17035, PUCT Order dated November 6, 2015, Page 6 of 7, paragraph #2 of Section IV.
Also, pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 72.30(c), Vistra OpCo is submitting the 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Docket No. 72-74 (CPNPP ISFSI). Attachment 2 to this letter contains the information required by 10 CFR 72.30(b).
Also, pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 72.30(c), Vistra OpCo is submitting the 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Docket No. 72-74 (CPNPP ISFSI). Attachment 2 to this letter contains the information required by 10 CFR 72.30(b).
The amounts to be collected for CPNPP decommissioning are based on a site specific decommissioning study that includes direct waste disposal. In addition, the radiological cost component breakdown of the 2014 Site Specific cost is included in the 2015 Financial Assurance filing (Enclosure to TXX-17035, Luminant Filing dated June 15, 2015, document Lll-1703-001, Rev. 0, Page xx of xxi).
The amounts to be collected for CPNPP decommissioning are based on a site specific decommissioning study that includes direct waste disposal. In addition, the radiological cost component breakdown of the 2014 Site Specific cost is included in the 2015 Financial Assurance filing (Enclosure to TXX-17035, Luminant Filing dated June 15, 2015, document Lll-1703-001, Rev. 0, Page xx of xxi).
When projected to the license expiration date for each unit using the 2 percent annual real rate of return as allowed per 10CFR50.75(e)(ii), the projected Nuclear Decommissioning Trust balance is greater than the escalated NRC minimum cost of decommissioning for Units 1 and 2.
When projected to the license expiration date for each unit using the 2 percent annual real rate of return as allowed per 10CFR50.75(e)(ii), the projected Nuclear Decommissioning Trust balance is greater than the escalated NRC minimum cost of decommissioning for Units 1 and 2.
Should you have any questions, please contact Carl B. Corbin at (254) 897-0121.
Should you have any questions, please contact Carl B. Corbin at (254) 897-0121.
Sincerely,       2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2       2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant.Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation c-               Scott A. Morris, Region IV Margaret Watford O'Banion, NRR Resident Inspectors, Comanche Peak to TXX-19032 Page 1 of2 NRC Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Financial Assurance at December 31, 2018 Luminant Generation Company LLC Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP)
Sincerely, 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant.Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation c -
Information is submitted to provide Financial Assurance                                     Unit# 1        Unit#2
Scott A. Morris, Region IV Margaret Watford O'Banion, NRR Resident Inspectors, Comanche Peak to TXX-19032 Page 1 of2 NRC Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Financial Assurance at December 31, 2018 Luminant Generation Company LLC Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP)
Information is submitted to provide Financial Assurance
: 1. The minimum amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required pursuant to IO CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).
: 1. The minimum amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required pursuant to IO CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).
At December 31, 2018 Using NRC 10 CFR 50.75(c) formulas (Note 1)                                   $ 407.9 million $ 407.9 million Site-specific study (Note 2)                                                 $ 825.3 million $ 896.6 million
At December 31, 2018 Using NRC 10 CFR 50.75(c) formulas (Note 1)
Site-specific study (Note 2)
: 2. The amount accumulated at the end of the calendar year preceding the date of the report for items included in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).
: 2. The amount accumulated at the end of the calendar year preceding the date of the report for items included in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).
Investment categories per Regulatory Guide 1.159 2.6.2. (Note 3)
Investment categories per Regulatory Guide 1.159 2.6.2. (Note 3)
Cash                                                                                   1%            1%
Cash U.S. Equities U.S. Fixed Income Market Value at December 31, 2018
U.S. Equities                                                                         62%          62%
: 3. A schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected for items in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).
U.S. Fixed Income                                                                     37%          37%
Years 2019 through 2029 Year 2030 Year2031 Year 2032 Year 2033
100%          100%
( 11 years)
Market Value at December 31, 2018                                             $ 552.8 million $ 616.9 million
Totals
: 3. A schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected for items in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).                                                                       Unit# 1        Unit# 2 Years 2019 through 2029             ( 11 years)                                11.9 million    8.2 million Year 2030                                                                         3.0 million    8.2 million Year2031                                                                                         8.2 million Year 2032                                                                                       8.2 million Year 2033                                                                                       2.0 million Totals                                   $ 133.8 million $ 116. 7 million
: 4. The assumptions used regarding escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections.
: 4. The assumptions used regarding escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections.                                                                       Unit# 1        Unit# 2 Estimated Escalation rate for decommissioning costs (Note 4)                                   2.4810%        2.4730%
Estimated Escalation rate for decommissioning costs (Note 4)
Estimated Earnings rates on decommissioning funds (Note 5) 2019 through 2029                                                                       4.46%        4.46%
Estimated Earnings rates on decommissioning funds (Note 5) 2019 through 2029 2030 through 2075 2076 and thereafter Rates of other factors used in funding projections
2030 through 2075                                                                       3.58%        3.58%
: 5. Any power sale contracts upon which licensee is relying to certifying financial assurance.
2076 and thereafter                                                                     2.61%        2.61%
: 6. Modifications to licensee's method of providing financial assurance since previous report.
Rates of other factors used in funding projections                                               None          None
: 7. Material changes to trust agreement.
: 5. Any power sale contracts upon which licensee is relying to certifying financial assurance.                                                                                 None          None
Unit# 1
: 6. Modifications to licensee's method of providing financial assurance since previous report.                                                                               None          None
$ 407.9 million
: 7. Material changes to trust agreement.                                                                 None           None NOTE: All forecast data are based on the Decommissioning Cost Study and Funding Analysis filed with the Public Utility Commission of Texas on June 16, 2015 and is subject to approval by the Commission.
$ 825.3 million 1%
to TXX-19032 Page 2 of2 Note 1               Labor (South) and Energy are based on BLS (Lx=2.624, Ex=2.365) as ofDecember 2018. Burial inflation factors are based on NUREG 1307, "Report on Waste Burial Charges," Revision 17 (Bx=8.508).
62%
Note2                The Site Specific Decommissioning Cost estimates for unit 1 and 2, with a 10% contingency adjustment, are provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, pages 228-231. See the Financial Escalation Analysis Document Ll 1-1703-002, Rev. 0, Page 12 through 15 of 29.
37%
Note3                The after-tax amount of funds accumulated through December 31, 2018 is provided below.
100%
Tax Basis             Market Value             AfterTax Unit 1   $337,792,776.00           $552,823,824.00       $509,817,614.40 Unit2   $386,325,326.00           $616,877,229.00       $570,766,848.40 Total   $724, 118,102.00       $1,169,701,053.00     $1,080,584,462.80 Note: Calculation of after tax balance assumes 20% tax rate.
$ 552.8 million Unit# 1 11.9 million 3.0 million
Note4                The rate of escalation in decommissioning costs for Unit 1 and 2 are provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, page 223. See the Financial Escalation Analysis Document Ll 1-1703-002, Rev. 0, Page 7 of 29.
$ 133.8 million Unit# 1 2.4810%
Note 5              The rate of earnings on decommissioning funds is provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, page 275. See the Direct Testimony of Robert Frenzel, Witness for Luminant Generation Company, 2015 Nuclear Decommissioning Study, Exhibit RF-4, pages 1-4 of 5. The Net Expected Investment Returns Allocation Factor in this schedule represents the weighted average allocations during the referenced Period as established in the June 16, 2015 filing.
4.46%
3.58%
2.61%
None None None None NOTE: All forecast data are based on the Decommissioning Cost Study and Funding Analysis filed with the Public Utility Commission of Texas on June 16, 2015 and is subject to approval by the Commission.
Unit#2
$ 407.9 million
$ 896.6 million 1%
62%
37%
100%
$ 616.9 million Unit# 2 8.2 million 8.2 million 8.2 million 8.2 million 2.0 million
$ 116. 7 million Unit# 2 2.4730%
4.46%
3.58%
2.61%
None None None None to TXX-19032 Page 2 of2 Note 1 Note2 Note3 Note4 Note 5 Labor (South) and Energy are based on BLS (Lx=2.624, Ex=2.365) as ofDecember 2018. Burial inflation factors are based on NUREG 1307, "Report on Waste Burial Charges," Revision 17 (Bx=8.508).
The Site Specific Decommissioning Cost estimates for unit 1 and 2, with a 10% contingency adjustment, are provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, pages 228-231. See the Financial Escalation Analysis Document Ll 1-1703-002, Rev. 0, Page 12 through 15 of 29.
The after-tax amount of funds accumulated through December 31, 2018 is provided below.
Tax Basis Market Value AfterTax Unit 1  
$337,792,776.00  
$552,823,824.00  
$509,817,614.40 Unit2  
$386,325,326.00  
$616,877,229.00  
$570,766,848.40 Total  
$724, 118,102.00  
$1,169,701,053.00  
$1,080,584,462.80 Note: Calculation of after tax balance assumes 20% tax rate.
The rate of escalation in decommissioning costs for Unit 1 and 2 are provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, page 223. See the Financial Escalation Analysis Document Ll 1-1703-002, Rev. 0, Page 7 of 29.
The rate of earnings on decommissioning funds is provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, page 275. See the Direct Testimony of Robert Frenzel, Witness for Luminant Generation Company, 2015 Nuclear Decommissioning Study, Exhibit RF-4, pages 1-4 of 5. The Net Expected Investment Returns Allocation Factor in this schedule represents the weighted average allocations during the referenced Period as established in the June 16, 2015 filing.
to TXX-19032 Pagel of2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30(c), each licensee for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI),
to TXX-19032 Pagel of2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30(c), each licensee for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI),
including an ISFSI licensed under the General License provided for in IO CFR Part 72, Subpart K, is required, at intervals not to exceed 3 years, to resubmit a decommissioning funding plan with adjustments as necessary to account for changes in costs and the extent of contamination, as well as information regarding the financial assurance provided for funding such costs. Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo) provides the following information regarding the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Docket No.
including an ISFSI licensed under the General License provided for in IO CFR Part 72, Subpart K, is required, at intervals not to exceed 3 years, to resubmit a decommissioning funding plan with adjustments as necessary to account for changes in costs and the extent of contamination, as well as information regarding the financial assurance provided for funding such costs. Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo) provides the following information regarding the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Docket No.
72-74 (CPNPP ISFSI):
72-74 (CPNPP ISFSI):
: 1.       Information on how reasonable assurance will be provided that funds will be available to decommission the ISFSI:
: 1.
Information on how reasonable assurance will be provided that funds will be available to decommission the ISFSI:
See response to number 4 below, which discusses the appropriate method of financial assurance contemplated under 10 CFR 72.30(e).
See response to number 4 below, which discusses the appropriate method of financial assurance contemplated under 10 CFR 72.30(e).
: 2.       A detailed cost estimate (DCE) for decommissioning:
: 2.
A detailed cost estimate (DCE) for decommissioning:
In a reported dated June 2015, TLG Services, Inc. (TLG) (Enclosure to TXX-17035 (ADAMS NO. ML17094A247) prepared a site specific Decommissioning Cost Study (with an adequate contingency factor) for the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) that included the costs of decommissioning the ISFSI. The TLG Report determined the total cost of decommissioning the CPNPP ISFSI (without contingency, Enclosure to letter TXX-17035, document Lll-1703-002, Rev.O, Appendix E, page 2 of 2, Table E, "Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant ISFSI Decommissioning Cost Estimate") to be:
In a reported dated June 2015, TLG Services, Inc. (TLG) (Enclosure to TXX-17035 (ADAMS NO. ML17094A247) prepared a site specific Decommissioning Cost Study (with an adequate contingency factor) for the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) that included the costs of decommissioning the ISFSI. The TLG Report determined the total cost of decommissioning the CPNPP ISFSI (without contingency, Enclosure to letter TXX-17035, document Lll-1703-002, Rev.O, Appendix E, page 2 of 2, Table E, "Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant ISFSI Decommissioning Cost Estimate") to be:
2014 Dollars     Escalation Factor(%)       2018 Dollars (million)        (from TLG Report)           (million)
Unitl Unit2 2014 Dollars (million) 3.6 3.6 Escalation Factor(%)
Unitl              3.6                2.481                  3.97 Unit2              3.6                  2.473                3.97 Total 7.9 This cost estimate includes the cost of an independent contractor to perform all decommissioning activities and the cost of meeting the 10 CFR 20.1402 criteria for unrestricted release.
(from TLG Report) 2.481 2.473 2018 Dollars (million) 3.97 3.97 Total 7.9 This cost estimate includes the cost of an independent contractor to perform all decommissioning activities and the cost of meeting the 10 CFR 20.1402 criteria for unrestricted release.
Below is the effect of the following on the detailed cost estimate since the previous report.
Below is the effect of the following on the detailed cost estimate since the previous report.
Spills of radioactive material producing additional     None residual radioactivity in onsite subsurface material Facility modifications                                   None*
Spills of radioactive material producing additional None residual radioactivity in onsite subsurface material Facility modifications None*
Changes in authorized possession limits                 None Actual remediation costs that exceed the previous       None cost estimate to TXX-19032 Page2of2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
Changes in authorized possession limits None Actual remediation costs that exceed the previous None cost estimate to TXX-19032 Page2of2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation  
                  *Enclosure to TXX-17035 (ADAMS No. ML17094A247), Document Lll-1703-002, Rev.
*Enclosure to TXX-17035 (ADAMS No. ML17094A247), Document Lll-1703-002, Rev.
0, dated May 2015, page viii of xii) states in part, "The only substantive changes made to the plant inventory from the 2010 analysis (that would impact decommissioning) were the addition of the Flex storage building and RP building." A stator assembly building has been added since Document Lll-1703-002 was issued in May 2015. These changes (addition of FLEX storage, stator assembly, and RP buildings) are within the scope of the analysis under 10 CFR 50.75 (Attachment 1 to TXX-19032).
0, dated May 2015, page viii of xii) states in part, "The only substantive changes made to the plant inventory from the 2010 analysis (that would impact decommissioning) were the addition of the Flex storage building and RP building." A stator assembly building has been added since Document Lll-1703-002 was issued in May 2015. These changes (addition of FLEX storage, stator assembly, and RP buildings) are within the scope of the analysis under 10 CFR 50.75 (Attachment 1 to TXX-19032).
: 3.     Identification of and justification for using the key assumptions contained in the decommissioning cost estimate:
: 3.
Identification of and justification for using the key assumptions contained in the decommissioning cost estimate:
The assumptions used in the development of the decommissioning cost estimate and their justification can be found in the TLG Report.
The assumptions used in the development of the decommissioning cost estimate and their justification can be found in the TLG Report.
: 4.       A description of the method of assuring funds for decommissioning from 10 CFR 72.30(e),
: 4.
A description of the method of assuring funds for decommissioning from 10 CFR 72.30(e),
including means of adjusting cost estimates and associated funding levels periodically over the life of the facility:
including means of adjusting cost estimates and associated funding levels periodically over the life of the facility:
Vistra OpCo is using the external sinking fund method as authorized in 10 CFR 72.30(e)(5) and 50.75(e)(l)(ii). Vistra OpCo recovers its costs for decommissioning through cost of service ratemaking, including the estimated costs to decommission the CPNPP ISFSI, which are included in the TLG Report. Pursuant to Substantive Rule 25.303(£)(2) of the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), the TLG Report is updated, and the required annual funding amount necessary to decommission CPNPP is adjusted under the jurisdiction of the PUCT.
Vistra OpCo is using the external sinking fund method as authorized in 10 CFR 72.30(e)(5) and 50.75(e)(l)(ii). Vistra OpCo recovers its costs for decommissioning through cost of service ratemaking, including the estimated costs to decommission the CPNPP ISFSI, which are included in the TLG Report. Pursuant to Substantive Rule 25.303(£)(2) of the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), the TLG Report is updated, and the required annual funding amount necessary to decommission CPNPP is adjusted under the jurisdiction of the PUCT.
In the event that funds remaining to be placed into the Vistra OpCo' s external sinking funds are no longer approved for recovery in rates by competent rate making authorities, Vistra OpCo will make changes to provide financial assurance using one or more of the methods stated in 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)-(4).
In the event that funds remaining to be placed into the Vistra OpCo' s external sinking funds are no longer approved for recovery in rates by competent rate making authorities, Vistra OpCo will make changes to provide financial assurance using one or more of the methods stated in 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)-(4).
: 5.       The volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination:
: 5.
The volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination:
There has been no event at the ISFSI facility to lead us to believe there is subsurface contamination. Therefore, Vistra OpCo assumes that there is no volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination.
There has been no event at the ISFSI facility to lead us to believe there is subsurface contamination. Therefore, Vistra OpCo assumes that there is no volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination.
: 6.       A certification that financial assurance for decommission has been provided in the amount of the cost estimate for decommissioning:
: 6.
The submission of this report serves as certification that financial assurance has been provided in the amount of the cost estimate for decommissioning.
A certification that financial assurance for decommission has been provided in the amount of the cost estimate for decommissioning:
The submission of this report serves as certification that financial assurance has been provided in the amount of the cost estimate for decommissioning.  


CORRESPONDENCE DISTRIBUTION To:         Distribution                                                                                                           File - SPARCS Document Number:                     TXX-19032 / CP-201900155                                 Document Issue Date: March 27, 2019 Title/  
CORRESPONDENCE DISTRIBUTION To:
Distribution File - SPARCS Document Number:
TXX-19032 / CP-201900155 Document Issue Date: March 27, 2019 Title/  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Line 98: Line 140:


==Contact:==
==Contact:==
C. Corbin BY SUBJECT                                                             ON SITE DISTRIBUTION T. A. Hope                           (RA/NLM)                           e-mail S. Z. Moore                         (Legal-Vistra)                     e-mail                                         ALL G. I:. MeFIEa                       (1:eR /. Pai=t ;aJ                 e A=iail     K. J. Peters                 (SVP /CNO)                   e-mail TXX File                             (ALL TXX)                         e-mail BY SUBJECT ALL                                       T. P. McCool                 (SVP)                 -      e-mail CCG-OOGA                             (CPNPP)                           e-mail       J. R. Dreyfuss               (OP/ PM)                     e-mail CERTREC                                                                 e-mail       8. F. St be1:1is             (GP{ElGPSJ                   e A=iail Margaret.O'Banion@nrc.gov                                               e-mail       J. J. ble*,*el               (GP/.SGMJ                   e A=iail J.C. Hicks                           (ALL Correspondence)               e-mail       1,1. SeRill                       i (GP @PS SYPPJ               e A=iail
C. Corbin BY SUBJECT ON SITE DISTRIBUTION T. A. Hope (RA/NLM) e-mail S. Z. Moore (Legal-Vistra) e-mail ALL G. I:. MeFIEa (1:eR /. Pai=t ;aJ e A=iail K. J. Peters (SVP /CNO) e-mail TXX File (ALL TXX) e-mail BY SUBJECT ALL T. P. McCool (SVP) e-mail CCG-OOGA (CPNPP) e-mail J. R. Dreyfuss (OP/ PM) e-mail CERTREC e-mail
                                                                                      ,0.. J. MaFi!le#             (9~1QSJ                     e A=iail OFF SITE DISTRIBUTION                                 9. ,o,. GeeelwiA             (Se/. 9Se)                   e A'lail R. 9e1313i                   (es f 9ePS)                 e A=iail BY SUBJECT                                     1,1.J.WiAA                   (eSf MSe)                   e A=iail R. 81:!FFell                         (WJ                               e A=iail     +. 9. GileleF                 (esf M9eJ                   e A=iail GeF13eFate GeA'IA'll:!AieatieAs                                                       R. 8. +R9A'lj359A           (eS f MP=l=e)               e A=iail M eel ia. RelatieAs@l 1:1 A'liAaAt. eeA'I                               e A=iail     9. L 9avis                   (Gef 129)                   e A=iail S. K. Sewell                 (SDERA)                     e-mail IRONLY                                       9. M. GRFistiaAseA           {9+j                         e A=iail W. Muilenburg                         (RUGIV)                           e-mail       M. G. StalEeS               (9GeJ                       e A=iail M. G. Ree11es               (9M,O.l~l+J                 e A=iail LERs l PART 21                                   R.G.KAa1313                 (RPM)                       e A=iail INPG                   (beRs /. 12,0,R+ 21)     leFe*1eAts@i1:113e.eFg             J. 9.1,11:111                 (ePMJ                       e A=iail INPG                   (leR Res13eAseJ           l~IPGleRRes13eAses@iA13e.eFg       CQ'9ell                     (9\1\/MJ                     e A=iail
: 8. F. St be1:1is (GP{ElGPSJ e A=iail Margaret.O'Banion@nrc.gov e-mail J. J. ble*,*el (GP/.SGMJ e A=iail J.C. Hicks (ALL Correspondence) e-mail 1,1. SeRill (GP i @PS SYPPJ e A=iail  
+91:R                   (PAR+21J                 eeileFs@tellF.teiEas.ge*,*
,0.. J. MaFi!le#
8FiaA G1:1tRFie         (leR Resi,ieAse)         eFiaA.g1:1tRFie@l1:1A=iiAaAt.eeA'I                         CPNPP IR RESPONSES S. 9. GaitaA                 (R,0./.S+)                   e A=iail M. G. StalEes               (gQeJ                       e A=iail M. Campbell             email                                                         12. K. MaFSR                 (GRGJ                       e A=iail
(9~1QSJ e A=iail OFF SITE DISTRIBUTION
: 0. Marx                 email K. Mandrell             email                                                                                           LER g, s. l.,lellEeAiAg         (NGS)                       e A=iail 1,1, l,laFA'l9A             {eS f Se)                   e A=iail
: 9.,o,. GeeelwiA (Se/. 9Se) e A'lail R.
: 12. K. MaFSR                 (GRG SeG)                   e A=iail G. +. ~lelaAel               (SGRG SeG)                   e A=iail g_ W. RieRe*;               (GPS SYPPJ                   e A=iail R. lJ SwaAseA               (NGSJ                       e A=iail
9e1313i (es f 9ePS) e A=iail BY SUBJECT 1,1.J.WiAA (eSf MSe) e A=iail R. 81:!FFell (WJ e A=iail  
                                                                                      ~- gl:!ARaA'I               (PIJ                         e A=iail 1,1, KeAyeA                 (Seq                         e A=iail OTHER M. MeNall*t                   (SeG, /l,GGeSS, FF9J       e A=iail
+. 9. GileleF (esf M9eJ e A=iail GeF13eFate GeA'IA'll:!AieatieAs R. 8. +R9A'lj359A (eS f MP=l=e) e A=iail M eel ia. RelatieAs@l 1:1 A'liAaAt. eeA'I e A=iail
: w. Jaeees                   (VeN9GRJ                     e A=iail K. Me~!all*r *               (GPeR 1:IGJ                 e A=iail Special distribution instructions: Yes/ No {If yes, attach separate sheet with instructions)
: 9. L 9avis (Gef 129) e A=iail S. K. Sewell (SDERA) e-mail IRONLY
FC - First Class Mail                           ORC - Part 21 submittals/ incoming notifications, LER and descriptions for LBD changes.
: 9. M. GRFistiaAseA
IR- Inspection Reports                             NODIL- Correspondence related to material/component acceptability IOER - NRCB, GL, IN, NUREG                       VENDOR - Vendor documents per STA-206 (Vendor Document Group)
{9+j e A=iail W. Muilenburg (RUGIV) e-mail M. G. StalEeS (9GeJ e A=iail M. G. Ree11es (9M,O.l~l+J e A=iail LERs l PART 21,
R.G.KAa1313 (RPM) e A=iail INPG (beRs /. 12,0,R+ 21) leFe*1eAts@i1:113e.eFg J. 9.1,11:111 (ePMJ e A=iail INPG (leR Res13eAseJ l~IPGleRRes13eAses@iA13e.eFg CQ'9ell (9\\1\\/MJ e A=iail  
+91:R (PAR+21J eeileFs@tellF.teiEas.ge*,*
8FiaA G1:1tRFie (leR Resi,ieAse) eFiaA.g1:1tRFie@l1:1A=iiAaAt.eeA'I CPNPP IR RESPONSES S. 9. GaitaA (R,0./.S+)
e A=iail M. G. StalEes (gQeJ e A=iail M. Campbell email
: 12. K. MaFSR (GRGJ e A=iail
: 0. Marx email K. Mandrell email LER g, s. l.,lellEeAiAg (NGS) e A=iail 1,1, l,laFA'l9A
{eS f Se) e A=iail
: 12. K. MaFSR (GRG SeG) e A=iail G. +. ~lelaAel (SGRG SeG) e A=iail g_ W. RieRe*;
(GPS SYPPJ e A=iail R. lJ SwaAseA (NGSJ e A=iail  
~- gl:!ARaA'I (PIJ e A=iail 1,1, KeAyeA (Seq e A=iail OTHER M. MeNall*t (SeG, /l,GGeSS, FF9J e A=iail
: w. Jaeees (VeN9GRJ e A=iail K. Me~!all*r *
(GPeR 1:IGJ e A=iail Special distribution instructions: Yes/ No {If yes, attach separate sheet with instructions)
FC - First Class Mail ORC - Part 21 submittals/ incoming notifications, LER and descriptions for LBD changes.
IR-Inspection Reports NODIL-Correspondence related to material/component acceptability IOER - NRCB, GL, IN, NUREG VENDOR - Vendor documents per STA-206 (Vendor Document Group)
PUC - Monthly Operating Reports, Notices of Civil Penalty, and LERs If revisions are required to distribution or distribution sheet, contact Regulatory Affairs (CPNPP).}}
PUC - Monthly Operating Reports, Notices of Civil Penalty, and LERs If revisions are required to distribution or distribution sheet, contact Regulatory Affairs (CPNPP).}}

Latest revision as of 04:00, 5 January 2025

Decommissioning Report
ML19088A083
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/2019
From: Thomas McCool
Luminant Generation Co, TXU Energy, Vistra Operations Company
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
CP-201900155, TXX-19032
Download: ML19088A083 (7)


Text

CP-201900155 TXX-19032 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATIN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

&TXu I m

-.., energy Luminant 3/27/2019

SUBJECT:

Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP)

Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-445 and 72-74 Decommissioning Report Thomas P. McCool Site Vice President Luminant P.O. Box 1002 6322 North FM 56 Glen Rose, TX 76043 o 254.897.6042 Ref 10 CFR 50.75(f) 10 CFR 72.30(c)

Reference

1. Vistra Operations Company LLC letter logged TXX-17035, from T. Hope to the N RC, "Decommissioning Report," dated March 30, 2017 (ADAMS No. ML17094A247)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Attached is the biennial decommissioning report for Comanche Peak'Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Units 1 and 2, prepared and submitted by Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo / operator) pursuant to 10CFR50.75(f) and 10CFR72.30(c). Comanche Peak Power Company LLC (CP PowerCo / owner) is an unregulated utility and therefore does not meet the definition of an electric utility as defined by 10CFR50.2. The recovery of decommissioning funds for the eventual decommissioning of CPNPP Units 1 and 2 is assured through the collection of a non-bypassable charge which is subsequently contributed to an external trust.

The applicable sections of the citation (e.g., an Order by the rate-regulatory authority) by the regulatory authority that allows for the collection of non-bypassable charges established for the collection of decommissioning funds estimated to be required under 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c) is provided below.

The distribution utility will collect from customers and the generation company will contribute all funds collected to the decommissioning trust fund:

Enclosure to TXX-17035 (Reference 1), Public Utility Commission ofTexas (PUCT) Order dated

/

November 6, 2015, page 3 of 7, paragraph #9.

Ab/)

6555 SIERRA DRIVE IRVING, TEXAS 75039 0214-812-4600 VISTRAENERGY.COM

/./'1552-/p tv!UL

TXX-19032 Page 2 of 2 The annual collection rate for each unit:

Enclosure to TXX-17035, Annual Projected Funding Requirement, 2015 Funding Analysis, Exhibit 8RF-4, Page 5 of 5.

Enclosure to TXX-17035, PUCT Order dated November 6, 2015, Page 6 of 7, paragraph #2 of Section IV.

Also, pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 72.30(c), Vistra OpCo is submitting the 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Docket No. 72-74 (CPNPP ISFSI). Attachment 2 to this letter contains the information required by 10 CFR 72.30(b).

The amounts to be collected for CPNPP decommissioning are based on a site specific decommissioning study that includes direct waste disposal. In addition, the radiological cost component breakdown of the 2014 Site Specific cost is included in the 2015 Financial Assurance filing (Enclosure to TXX-17035, Luminant Filing dated June 15, 2015, document Lll-1703-001, Rev. 0, Page xx of xxi).

When projected to the license expiration date for each unit using the 2 percent annual real rate of return as allowed per 10CFR50.75(e)(ii), the projected Nuclear Decommissioning Trust balance is greater than the escalated NRC minimum cost of decommissioning for Units 1 and 2.

Should you have any questions, please contact Carl B. Corbin at (254) 897-0121.

Sincerely, 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant.Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation c -

Scott A. Morris, Region IV Margaret Watford O'Banion, NRR Resident Inspectors, Comanche Peak to TXX-19032 Page 1 of2 NRC Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Financial Assurance at December 31, 2018 Luminant Generation Company LLC Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP)

Information is submitted to provide Financial Assurance

1. The minimum amount of decommissioning funds estimated to be required pursuant to IO CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).

At December 31, 2018 Using NRC 10 CFR 50.75(c) formulas (Note 1)

Site-specific study (Note 2)

2. The amount accumulated at the end of the calendar year preceding the date of the report for items included in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).

Investment categories per Regulatory Guide 1.159 2.6.2. (Note 3)

Cash U.S. Equities U.S. Fixed Income Market Value at December 31, 2018

3. A schedule of the annual amounts remaining to be collected for items in 10 CFR 50.75 (b) and (c).

Years 2019 through 2029 Year 2030 Year2031 Year 2032 Year 2033

( 11 years)

Totals

4. The assumptions used regarding escalation in decommissioning costs, rates of earnings on decommissioning funds, and rates of other factors used in funding projections.

Estimated Escalation rate for decommissioning costs (Note 4)

Estimated Earnings rates on decommissioning funds (Note 5) 2019 through 2029 2030 through 2075 2076 and thereafter Rates of other factors used in funding projections

5. Any power sale contracts upon which licensee is relying to certifying financial assurance.
6. Modifications to licensee's method of providing financial assurance since previous report.
7. Material changes to trust agreement.

Unit# 1

$ 407.9 million

$ 825.3 million 1%

62%

37%

100%

$ 552.8 million Unit# 1 11.9 million 3.0 million

$ 133.8 million Unit# 1 2.4810%

4.46%

3.58%

2.61%

None None None None NOTE: All forecast data are based on the Decommissioning Cost Study and Funding Analysis filed with the Public Utility Commission of Texas on June 16, 2015 and is subject to approval by the Commission.

Unit#2

$ 407.9 million

$ 896.6 million 1%

62%

37%

100%

$ 616.9 million Unit# 2 8.2 million 8.2 million 8.2 million 8.2 million 2.0 million

$ 116. 7 million Unit# 2 2.4730%

4.46%

3.58%

2.61%

None None None None to TXX-19032 Page 2 of2 Note 1 Note2 Note3 Note4 Note 5 Labor (South) and Energy are based on BLS (Lx=2.624, Ex=2.365) as ofDecember 2018. Burial inflation factors are based on NUREG 1307, "Report on Waste Burial Charges," Revision 17 (Bx=8.508).

The Site Specific Decommissioning Cost estimates for unit 1 and 2, with a 10% contingency adjustment, are provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, pages 228-231. See the Financial Escalation Analysis Document Ll 1-1703-002, Rev. 0, Page 12 through 15 of 29.

The after-tax amount of funds accumulated through December 31, 2018 is provided below.

Tax Basis Market Value AfterTax Unit 1

$337,792,776.00

$552,823,824.00

$509,817,614.40 Unit2

$386,325,326.00

$616,877,229.00

$570,766,848.40 Total

$724, 118,102.00

$1,169,701,053.00

$1,080,584,462.80 Note: Calculation of after tax balance assumes 20% tax rate.

The rate of escalation in decommissioning costs for Unit 1 and 2 are provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, page 223. See the Financial Escalation Analysis Document Ll 1-1703-002, Rev. 0, Page 7 of 29.

The rate of earnings on decommissioning funds is provided in the Enclosure to the referenced letter, page 275. See the Direct Testimony of Robert Frenzel, Witness for Luminant Generation Company, 2015 Nuclear Decommissioning Study, Exhibit RF-4, pages 1-4 of 5. The Net Expected Investment Returns Allocation Factor in this schedule represents the weighted average allocations during the referenced Period as established in the June 16, 2015 filing.

to TXX-19032 Pagel of2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30(c), each licensee for an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI),

including an ISFSI licensed under the General License provided for in IO CFR Part 72, Subpart K, is required, at intervals not to exceed 3 years, to resubmit a decommissioning funding plan with adjustments as necessary to account for changes in costs and the extent of contamination, as well as information regarding the financial assurance provided for funding such costs. Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo) provides the following information regarding the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Docket No.

72-74 (CPNPP ISFSI):

1.

Information on how reasonable assurance will be provided that funds will be available to decommission the ISFSI:

See response to number 4 below, which discusses the appropriate method of financial assurance contemplated under 10 CFR 72.30(e).

2.

A detailed cost estimate (DCE) for decommissioning:

In a reported dated June 2015, TLG Services, Inc. (TLG) (Enclosure to TXX-17035 (ADAMS NO. ML17094A247) prepared a site specific Decommissioning Cost Study (with an adequate contingency factor) for the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP) that included the costs of decommissioning the ISFSI. The TLG Report determined the total cost of decommissioning the CPNPP ISFSI (without contingency, Enclosure to letter TXX-17035, document Lll-1703-002, Rev.O, Appendix E, page 2 of 2, Table E, "Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant ISFSI Decommissioning Cost Estimate") to be:

Unitl Unit2 2014 Dollars (million) 3.6 3.6 Escalation Factor(%)

(from TLG Report) 2.481 2.473 2018 Dollars (million) 3.97 3.97 Total 7.9 This cost estimate includes the cost of an independent contractor to perform all decommissioning activities and the cost of meeting the 10 CFR 20.1402 criteria for unrestricted release.

Below is the effect of the following on the detailed cost estimate since the previous report.

Spills of radioactive material producing additional None residual radioactivity in onsite subsurface material Facility modifications None*

Changes in authorized possession limits None Actual remediation costs that exceed the previous None cost estimate to TXX-19032 Page2of2 2019 Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

0, dated May 2015, page viii of xii) states in part, "The only substantive changes made to the plant inventory from the 2010 analysis (that would impact decommissioning) were the addition of the Flex storage building and RP building." A stator assembly building has been added since Document Lll-1703-002 was issued in May 2015. These changes (addition of FLEX storage, stator assembly, and RP buildings) are within the scope of the analysis under 10 CFR 50.75 (Attachment 1 to TXX-19032).

3.

Identification of and justification for using the key assumptions contained in the decommissioning cost estimate:

The assumptions used in the development of the decommissioning cost estimate and their justification can be found in the TLG Report.

4.

A description of the method of assuring funds for decommissioning from 10 CFR 72.30(e),

including means of adjusting cost estimates and associated funding levels periodically over the life of the facility:

Vistra OpCo is using the external sinking fund method as authorized in 10 CFR 72.30(e)(5) and 50.75(e)(l)(ii). Vistra OpCo recovers its costs for decommissioning through cost of service ratemaking, including the estimated costs to decommission the CPNPP ISFSI, which are included in the TLG Report. Pursuant to Substantive Rule 25.303(£)(2) of the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT), the TLG Report is updated, and the required annual funding amount necessary to decommission CPNPP is adjusted under the jurisdiction of the PUCT.

In the event that funds remaining to be placed into the Vistra OpCo' s external sinking funds are no longer approved for recovery in rates by competent rate making authorities, Vistra OpCo will make changes to provide financial assurance using one or more of the methods stated in 10 CFR 72.30(e)(1)-(4).

5.

The volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination:

There has been no event at the ISFSI facility to lead us to believe there is subsurface contamination. Therefore, Vistra OpCo assumes that there is no volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity that will require remediation to meet the criteria for license termination.

6.

A certification that financial assurance for decommission has been provided in the amount of the cost estimate for decommissioning:

The submission of this report serves as certification that financial assurance has been provided in the amount of the cost estimate for decommissioning.

CORRESPONDENCE DISTRIBUTION To:

Distribution File - SPARCS Document Number:

TXX-19032 / CP-201900155 Document Issue Date: March 27, 2019 Title/

Subject:

Decommissioning Report Comments: None Regulatory Affairs

Contact:

C. Corbin BY SUBJECT ON SITE DISTRIBUTION T. A. Hope (RA/NLM) e-mail S. Z. Moore (Legal-Vistra) e-mail ALL G. I:. MeFIEa (1:eR /. Pai=t ;aJ e A=iail K. J. Peters (SVP /CNO) e-mail TXX File (ALL TXX) e-mail BY SUBJECT ALL T. P. McCool (SVP) e-mail CCG-OOGA (CPNPP) e-mail J. R. Dreyfuss (OP/ PM) e-mail CERTREC e-mail

8. F. St be1:1is (GP{ElGPSJ e A=iail Margaret.O'Banion@nrc.gov e-mail J. J. ble*,*el (GP/.SGMJ e A=iail J.C. Hicks (ALL Correspondence) e-mail 1,1. SeRill (GP i @PS SYPPJ e A=iail

,0.. J. MaFi!le#

(9~1QSJ e A=iail OFF SITE DISTRIBUTION

9.,o,. GeeelwiA (Se/. 9Se) e A'lail R.

9e1313i (es f 9ePS) e A=iail BY SUBJECT 1,1.J.WiAA (eSf MSe) e A=iail R. 81:!FFell (WJ e A=iail

+. 9. GileleF (esf M9eJ e A=iail GeF13eFate GeA'IA'll:!AieatieAs R. 8. +R9A'lj359A (eS f MP=l=e) e A=iail M eel ia. RelatieAs@l 1:1 A'liAaAt. eeA'I e A=iail

9. L 9avis (Gef 129) e A=iail S. K. Sewell (SDERA) e-mail IRONLY
9. M. GRFistiaAseA

{9+j e A=iail W. Muilenburg (RUGIV) e-mail M. G. StalEeS (9GeJ e A=iail M. G. Ree11es (9M,O.l~l+J e A=iail LERs l PART 21,

R.G.KAa1313 (RPM) e A=iail INPG (beRs /. 12,0,R+ 21) leFe*1eAts@i1:113e.eFg J. 9.1,11:111 (ePMJ e A=iail INPG (leR Res13eAseJ l~IPGleRRes13eAses@iA13e.eFg CQ'9ell (9\\1\\/MJ e A=iail

+91:R (PAR+21J eeileFs@tellF.teiEas.ge*,*

8FiaA G1:1tRFie (leR Resi,ieAse) eFiaA.g1:1tRFie@l1:1A=iiAaAt.eeA'I CPNPP IR RESPONSES S. 9. GaitaA (R,0./.S+)

e A=iail M. G. StalEes (gQeJ e A=iail M. Campbell email

12. K. MaFSR (GRGJ e A=iail
0. Marx email K. Mandrell email LER g, s. l.,lellEeAiAg (NGS) e A=iail 1,1, l,laFA'l9A

{eS f Se) e A=iail

12. K. MaFSR (GRG SeG) e A=iail G. +. ~lelaAel (SGRG SeG) e A=iail g_ W. RieRe*;

(GPS SYPPJ e A=iail R. lJ SwaAseA (NGSJ e A=iail

~- gl:!ARaA'I (PIJ e A=iail 1,1, KeAyeA (Seq e A=iail OTHER M. MeNall*t (SeG, /l,GGeSS, FF9J e A=iail

w. Jaeees (VeN9GRJ e A=iail K. Me~!all*r *

(GPeR 1:IGJ e A=iail Special distribution instructions: Yes/ No {If yes, attach separate sheet with instructions)

FC - First Class Mail ORC - Part 21 submittals/ incoming notifications, LER and descriptions for LBD changes.

IR-Inspection Reports NODIL-Correspondence related to material/component acceptability IOER - NRCB, GL, IN, NUREG VENDOR - Vendor documents per STA-206 (Vendor Document Group)

PUC - Monthly Operating Reports, Notices of Civil Penalty, and LERs If revisions are required to distribution or distribution sheet, contact Regulatory Affairs (CPNPP).