ML19311C711: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1
{{#Wiki_filter:22
* GTCC Disposal - Under the DOE Standard Contract, the DOE is obligated to accept 2                  and dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level waste. The courts have 3                  determined that GTCC is high level waste, which DOE is obligated to accept and 4                  dispose of under the DOE Standard Contract, but have stated that that does not mean 5                  that the government will have to bear the cost of GTCC waste disposal alone.
* GTCC Disposal - Under the DOE Standard Contract, the DOE is obligated to accept 1
6                  The courts have not provided a disposal cost.35 7
and dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level waste. The courts have 2
* Cyber Security Modifications - Under 10 C.F.R. § 73.54, SCE was required to 8                  develop a cyber security plan that addressed eight milestones to ensure certain digital 9                  assets, such as computer and communication systems and networks, are secure and 10                   protected.
determined that GTCC is high level waste, which DOE is obligated to accept and 3
dispose of under the DOE Standard Contract, but have stated that that does not mean 4
that the government will have to bear the cost of GTCC waste disposal alone.
5 The courts have not provided a disposal cost.35 6
* Cyber Security Modifications - Under 10 C.F.R. § 73.54, SCE was required to 7
develop a cyber security plan that addressed eight milestones to ensure certain digital 8
assets, such as computer and communication systems and networks, are secure and 9
protected.
10
* California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - Under CEQA, the CSLC, as lead 11 agency, is required to evaluate the SONGS decommissioning project and prepare an 12 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in response to SCEs application to modify and 13 extend the existing CSLC lease regarding the offshore conduits. The CEQA process 14 began in 2015. The CSLC is expected to certify the EIR in late of 2018. The CCC is 15 then expected to review an application for a CDP for SONGS decommissioning based 16 on the EIR, as well as its own additional analysis. The CCC is expected to consider 17 SCEs CDP application by the end of 2018. Following the receipt of the CDP, 18 physical decommissioning of the plant can proceed.
19
* Mesa Site Turnover - SCEs Mesa lease from the Navy consists of five parcels.36 20 Parcel 5 is on the west side of U.S. Interstate Highway 5 (I-5) and includes a security 21 station to control access to Parcels 6 and 7. Parcels 6 and 7 are located on the east 22 side of I-5 and along with Parcel 5 comprise the area known as the Mesa site. Parcels 23 8 and 9 include a parking lot and lay-down area on the west side of I-5 and abut the 24 SONGS site. SCE currently estimates that Parcels 5, 6, and 7 will be returned to the 25 35 Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. U.S., 536 F.3d 1268, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
36 See Appendix E for map of the parcel locations.
 
23 Navy in 2021, and Parcels 8 & 9 will be retained until the end of decommissioning.
1 As part of the process to return Parcels 5, 6, and 7 to the Navy, SCE must first assess 2
the property and remediate SONGS-caused contamination to the extent necessary to 3
obtain No Further Action Letters from the California Department of Toxic 4
Substances Control (DTSC) indicating the property is available for unrestricted use.37 5
* Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement - In 2044, SCE will begin efforts to 6
procure a contractor for the removal of SONGS substructures and placement of 7
permanent backfill. Because the dewatering, shoring, excavation, removal, and 8
backfilling of the substructures will be a very large and specialized work scope, SCE 9
will incur the cost to undertake a competitive procurement process to identify and 10 select a specialty vendor to perform this work.
11
11
* California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - Under CEQA, the CSLC, as lead 12                   agency, is required to evaluate the SONGS decommissioning project and prepare an 13                  Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in response to SCEs application to modify and 14                   extend the existing CSLC lease regarding the offshore conduits. The CEQA process 15                   began in 2015. The CSLC is expected to certify the EIR in late of 2018. The CCC is 16                  then expected to review an application for a CDP for SONGS decommissioning based 17                  on the EIR, as well as its own additional analysis. The CCC is expected to consider 18                   SCEs CDP application by the end of 2018. Following the receipt of the CDP, 19                   physical decommissioning of the plant can proceed.
* Coastal Development Permit Extensions - SCE holds a CDP for the storage of 12 SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Areva ISFSI system until November 2022, and a 13 separate CDP to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Holtec ISFSI system until 2035.
20
14 Therefore, the 2017 DCE assumes SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions from the 15 CCC for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 16 2022 and 2035, respectively.
* Mesa Site Turnover - SCEs Mesa lease from the Navy consists of five parcels.36 21                  Parcel 5 is on the west side of U.S. Interstate Highway 5 (I-5) and includes a security 22                  station to control access to Parcels 6 and 7. Parcels 6 and 7 are located on the east 23                  side of I-5 and along with Parcel 5 comprise the area known as the Mesa site. Parcels 24                  8 and 9 include a parking lot and lay-down area on the west side of I-5 and abut the 25                  SONGS site. SCE currently estimates that Parcels 5, 6, and 7 will be returned to the 35 Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. U.S., 536 F.3d 1268, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2008).
17
36 See Appendix E for map of the parcel locations.
* ISFSI Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Settlement - In August 2017, SCE reached 18 a settlement agreement with parties who challenged the CDP, wherein SCE agreed to 19 incur up to $4.3 million (100% share, 2014 $) on commercially reasonable efforts to 20 identify an offsite location for SONGS spent fuel storage.
22
21
* Future DCE Updates - Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to 22 periodically revise the DCEs to include descriptions of changes in regulation, 23 technology, and economics affecting the estimate of costs; and of additions and 24 37 On April 24, 2017, the DTSC issued a No Further Action Letter for Parcel 5. The efforts to assess and remediate contamination for Parcels 6 and 7 are ongoing. SCE continues to hold Parcel 5 because it provides access to Parcels 6 and 7.  


1                     Navy in 2021, and Parcels 8 & 9 will be retained until the end of decommissioning.
24 deletions to nuclear facilities.38 SCE submits such DCE updates to the Commission 1
2                     As part of the process to return Parcels 5, 6, and 7 to the Navy, SCE must first assess 3                    the property and remediate SONGS-caused contamination to the extent necessary to 4                    obtain No Further Action Letters from the California Department of Toxic 5                    Substances Control (DTSC) indicating the property is available for unrestricted use.37 6
in NDCTP proceedings.
* Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement - In 2044, SCE will begin efforts to 7                    procure a contractor for the removal of SONGS substructures and placement of 8                    permanent backfill. Because the dewatering, shoring, excavation, removal, and 9                    backfilling of the substructures will be a very large and specialized work scope, SCE 10                    will incur the cost to undertake a competitive procurement process to identify and 11                    select a specialty vendor to perform this work.
2
12
* North Industrial Area (NIA) Sump Modifications - The NIA sump (located on the 3
* Coastal Development Permit Extensions - SCE holds a CDP for the storage of 13                    SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Areva ISFSI system until November 2022, and a 14                    separate CDP to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Holtec ISFSI system until 2035.
site formerly occupied by SONGS 1) currently discharges to the SONGS 2&3 4
15                    Therefore, the 2017 DCE assumes SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions from the 16                    CCC for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 17                    2022 and 2035, respectively.
dilution water system. The SONGS 2&3 dilution water system will be retired by 5
18
SDS, and therefore the discharge pathway for the NIA sump will need to be modified.
* ISFSI Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Settlement - In August 2017, SCE reached 19                    a settlement agreement with parties who challenged the CDP, wherein SCE agreed to 20                    incur up to $4.3 million (100% share, 2014 $) on commercially reasonable efforts to 21                    identify an offsite location for SONGS spent fuel storage.
6 The estimated costs for the Other Distributed Projects category are shown in Table IV-4 7
22
below:
* Future DCE Updates - Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to 23                    periodically revise the DCEs to include descriptions of changes in regulation, 24                    technology, and economics affecting the estimate of costs; and of additions and 37 On April 24, 2017, the DTSC issued a No Further Action Letter for Parcel 5. The efforts to assess and remediate contamination for Parcels 6 and 7 are ongoing. SCE continues to hold Parcel 5 because it provides access to Parcels 6 and 7.
8 Table IV-4 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE Other Distributed Projects (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
23
The total estimated cost for these Other Distributed Projects in the 2017 DCE is 9
$99.6 million (100% share, 2014 $). The estimated cost for such Other Distributed Projects in the 2014 10 DCE was $72.9 million (100% share, 2014 $). Thus, the 2017 DCE includes a $26.7 million increase 11 for the Other Distributed Projects category.
12 38 Pub. Utilities Code § 8326.
Description 2017 DCE Total (2014 $)
2014 DCE Total (2014 $)
Variance 1
Other Projects 2
GTCC Disposal 40.7 50.6 (9.9) 3 Cyber Security Modifications 9.4 1.9 7.5 4
CEQA 7.9 2.7 5.2 5
Mesa Site Turnover 20.3 17.8 2.6 6
Previously Included Project Subtotal 78.3 72.9 5.4 7
8 Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 7.0 7.0 9
Coastal Development Permit Extensions 5.2 5.2 10 ISFSI CDP Settlement 4.3 4.3 11 DCE Update 3.7 3.7 12 NIA Sump Modifications 1.1 1.1 13 New Projects Subtotal 21.3 21.3 14 Other Projects Total 99.6 72.9 26.7


1                     deletions to nuclear facilities.38 SCE submits such DCE updates to the Commission 2                      in NDCTP proceedings.
25 After the development of the 2014 DCE, SCE determined that the cost to complete 1
3
several of its Other Distributed Project work scopes would be different than estimated in 2014. For 2
* North Industrial Area (NIA) Sump Modifications - The NIA sump (located on the 4                     site formerly occupied by SONGS 1) currently discharges to the SONGS 2&3 5                     dilution water system. The SONGS 2&3 dilution water system will be retired by 6                      SDS, and therefore the discharge pathway for the NIA sump will need to be modified.
example, in the 2014 DCE SCE estimated that the disposal cost for GTCC waste would be $50.6 million 3
7                  The estimated costs for the Other Distributed Projects category are shown in Table IV-4 8 below:
(100% share, 2014 $) based on the highest published disposal rates for Class C low level radioactive 4
Table IV-4 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE Other Distributed Projects (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
waste (LLRW). In the 2017 DCE, however, SCE assumed that the disposal cost for a canister of GTCC 5
2017 DCE        2014 DCE Total          Total Description                        (2014 $)        (2014 $)    Variance 1  Other Projects 2  GTCC Disposal                                      $      40.7  $        50.6  $    (9.9) 3  Cyber Security Modifications                                  9.4            1.9      7.5 4  CEQA                                                          7.9            2.7      5.2 5  Mesa Site Turnover                                          20.3            17.8       2.6 6  Previously Included Project Subtotal                $       78.3    $      72.9 $    5.4 7
waste would be comparable to the disposal cost for a canister of spent fuel. This resulted in an estimated 6
8  Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement        $         7.0  $            - $    7.0 9  Coastal Development Permit Extensions                        5.2               -      5.2 10  ISFSI CDP Settlement                                          4.3              -      4.3 11  DCE Update                                                    3.7              -      3.7 12   NIA Sump Modifications                                        1.1              -      1.1 13 New Projects Subtotal                                $      21.3   $            - $    21.3 14 Other Projects Total                                $      99.6    $      72.9  $    26.7 9                  The total estimated cost for these Other Distributed Projects in the 2017 DCE is 10 $99.6 million (100% share, 2014 $). The estimated cost for such Other Distributed Projects in the 2014 11 DCE was $72.9 million (100% share, 2014 $). Thus, the 2017 DCE includes a $26.7 million increase 12 for the Other Distributed Projects category.
GTCC disposal cost in the 2017 DCE of $40.7 million39 (100% share, 2014 $), a decrease of $9.9 7
38  Pub. Utilities Code § 8326.
million.
24
8 With respect to Cyber Security-related work, the 2014 DCE included $1.9 million (100%
9 share, 2014 $) and assumed the work would be completed in 2013. At that time, SCE believed that after 10 SCE submitted the certifications of permanently ceased operations for SONGS 2&3, SCE would no 11 longer be subject to the cyber security requirements of 10 C.F.R. § 73.54. However, SCE subsequently 12 determined that the SONGS Cyber Security Plan was still required because it was described in the 13 Physical Security Plan License Condition for SONGS 2&3. Other decommissioning plants had sought 14 an exemption from the cyber security requirements, but the NRC had not yet approved those requests.
15 It was prudent for SCE to wait for the NRC to review these requests and provide further guidance prior 16 to SCE submitting an exemption request so as to avoid any protracted delays in the NRCs review 17 process. In the meantime, SCE was obligated to comply with the requirements related to performing 18 cyber security assessments, but not the more costly implementation aspects of the requirements.
19 When the NRC indicated a willingness to grant such exemption requests, SCE submitted a License 20 Amendment Request (LAR) to the NRC in June 2017, wherein SCE requested removal of the 21 requirement to fully implement the SONGS Cyber Security Plan. At the end of 2017, the NRC granted 22 approval for SONGS to remove the cyber security license condition, thus waiving the implementation 23 requirements. Prior to the NRCs granting of the exemption, SCE had expended $9.4 million40 (100%
24 39 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 188.
40 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 191.  


1                 After the development of the 2014 DCE, SCE determined that the cost to complete 2 several of its Other Distributed Project work scopes would be different than estimated in 2014. For 3 example, in the 2014 DCE SCE estimated that the disposal cost for GTCC waste would be $50.6 million 4 (100% share, 2014 $) based on the highest published disposal rates for Class C low level radioactive 5 waste (LLRW). In the 2017 DCE, however, SCE assumed that the disposal cost for a canister of GTCC 6 waste would be comparable to the disposal cost for a canister of spent fuel. This resulted in an estimated 7 GTCC disposal cost in the 2017 DCE of $40.7 million39 (100% share, 2014 $), a decrease of $9.9 8 million.
26 share, 2014 $) to implement cyber security assessments. SCE included this recorded amount in the 2017 1
9                With respect to Cyber Security-related work, the 2014 DCE included $1.9 million (100%
DCE, resulting in a $7.5 million increase over the amount estimated in the 2014 DCE.
10 share, 2014 $) and assumed the work would be completed in 2013. At that time, SCE believed that after 11 SCE submitted the certifications of permanently ceased operations for SONGS 2&3, SCE would no 12 longer be subject to the cyber security requirements of 10 C.F.R. § 73.54. However, SCE subsequently 13 determined that the SONGS Cyber Security Plan was still required because it was described in the 14 Physical Security Plan License Condition for SONGS 2&3. Other decommissioning plants had sought 15 an exemption from the cyber security requirements, but the NRC had not yet approved those requests.
2 With respect to the CEQA project, the 2017 DCE forecast $7.9 million41 (100% share, 3
16 It was prudent for SCE to wait for the NRC to review these requests and provide further guidance prior 17 to SCE submitting an exemption request so as to avoid any protracted delays in the NRCs review 18 process. In the meantime, SCE was obligated to comply with the requirements related to performing 19 cyber security assessments, but not the more costly implementation aspects of the requirements.
2014 $). The 2014 DCE forecasted this major project at $2.7 million (100% share, 2014 $), resulting in 4
20 When the NRC indicated a willingness to grant such exemption requests, SCE submitted a License 21 Amendment Request (LAR) to the NRC in June 2017, wherein SCE requested removal of the 22 requirement to fully implement the SONGS Cyber Security Plan. At the end of 2017, the NRC granted 23 approval for SONGS to remove the cyber security license condition, thus waiving the implementation 24 requirements. Prior to the NRCs granting of the exemption, SCE had expended $9.4 million40 (100%
an increase of $5.2 million. The increase occurred because the time and effort required to complete this 5
39  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 188.
activity were greater than assumed during the development of the 2014 DCE. Specifically, SCE 6
40  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 191.
originally anticipated the CEQA review would be completed in approximately one year. Given the 7
25
complexity of and varied interests (Navy, local communities, environmental advocates) that must be 8
considered, SCE now anticipates that it will be nearly a four-year effort. SCE underestimated the level 9
of effort necessary to complete the CEQA review, resulting in the variance. This activity is required in 10 order to begin D&D.
11 With respect to Mesa Site Turnover project, the 2017 DCE forecast $20.3 million42 12 (100% share, 2014 $). The 2014 DCE forecasted this major project at $17.8 million (100% share, 2014 13
$), resulting in an increase of $2.6 million. The increase occurred because the time and effort required 14 to complete this activity were greater than assumed during the development of the 2014 DCE.
15 Specifically, SCE originally expected to return the property to the Navy in 2017 with limited 16 environmental characterization. Subsequently, the Navy imposed stringent remediation standards for 17 the property requiring more extensive characterization and remediation, so turnover is now expected to 18 occur in 2021. SCE must comply with the Navys requirements.
19 The remaining Other Distributed Projects were not included in the 2014 DCE because 20 their scopes emerged after the 2014 DCE was developed. SCE estimated their costs as follows:
21 Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement - The 2017 DCE includes costs of 22  
$7.0 million43 (100% share, 2014 $) for a competitive bidding process to select a substructure removal 23 contractor, including the development of a Request for Proposal, proposal evaluation, and contract 24 41 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 184.
42 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 178.
43 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 190.  


1 share, 2014 $) to implement cyber security assessments. SCE included this recorded amount in the 2017 2 DCE, resulting in a $7.5 million increase over the amount estimated in the 2014 DCE.
27 award. The estimate is approximately one-half the cost to procure a DGC for the major D&D work 1
3                  With respect to the CEQA project, the 2017 DCE forecast $7.9 million41 (100% share, 4 2014 $). The 2014 DCE forecasted this major project at $2.7 million (100% share, 2014 $), resulting in 5 an increase of $5.2 million. The increase occurred because the time and effort required to complete this 6 activity were greater than assumed during the development of the 2014 DCE. Specifically, SCE 7 originally anticipated the CEQA review would be completed in approximately one year. Given the 8 complexity of and varied interests (Navy, local communities, environmental advocates) that must be 9 considered, SCE now anticipates that it will be nearly a four-year effort. SCE underestimated the level 10 of effort necessary to complete the CEQA review, resulting in the variance. This activity is required in 11 order to begin D&D.
because the scope of this effort is nearly half the scope of the DGC D&D work.
12                  With respect to Mesa Site Turnover project, the 2017 DCE forecast $20.3 million42 13 (100% share, 2014 $). The 2014 DCE forecasted this major project at $17.8 million (100% share, 2014 14 $), resulting in an increase of $2.6 million. The increase occurred because the time and effort required 15 to complete this activity were greater than assumed during the development of the 2014 DCE.
2 Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Extensions - The 2017 DCE includes costs of 3
16 Specifically, SCE originally expected to return the property to the Navy in 2017 with limited 17 environmental characterization. Subsequently, the Navy imposed stringent remediation standards for 18 the property requiring more extensive characterization and remediation, so turnover is now expected to 19 occur in 2021. SCE must comply with the Navys requirements.
$5.2 million44 (100% share, 2014 $) for SCE to obtain extensions for the Areva and Holtec CDPs.
20                 The remaining Other Distributed Projects were not included in the 2014 DCE because 21 their scopes emerged after the 2014 DCE was developed. SCE estimated their costs as follows:
4 SCE holds a CDP to construct and operate the Areva ISFSI to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel until 5
22                  Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement - The 2017 DCE includes costs of 23 $7.0 million43 (100% share, 2014 $) for a competitive bidding process to select a substructure removal 24 contractor, including the development of a Request for Proposal, proposal evaluation, and contract 41  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 184.
November 2022, and a separate CDP to construct and operate the Holtec ISFSI to store SONGS 2&3 6
42  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 178.
spent fuel until 2035. The 2017 DCE assumes SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions from the CCC 7
43  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 190.
for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 2022 and 2035, 8
26
respectively. SCE considered the recorded costs from past CDP applications and the complexities of the 9
anticipated issues that will require evaluation in these two CDP extensions to estimate the cost to obtain 10 these two CDP extensions.
11 ISFSI CDP Settlement - As part of the ISFSI CDP Settlement, SCE agreed to incur up to 12
$4.0 million (100% share, nominal $) on commercially reasonable efforts to identify an offsite location 13 for SONGS spent fuel storage. SCE also included $0.3 million (100% share, nominal $) for SCE 14 outside counsel legal costs to reach the settlement.45 SCE also included $0.8 million (100% share, 15 nominal $) for attorneys fees to plaintiffs counsel, as agreed to in the settlement.46 This $5.1 million 16 (100% share, nominal $) increase was unforeseeable at the time the 2014 DCE was developed.
17 This cost category was shared between SONGS 1 and SONGS 2&3. The amount allocated to SONGS 18 2&3 is $4.3 million (100% share, 2014 $). The settlement allowed SCE to proceed with transferring 19 fuel to the ISFSI. It is also reasonable for SCE to explore offsite locations for the storage of spent fuel.
20 Future DCE Updates - SCE assumes a cost of $3.7 million47 (100% share, 2014 $) to 21 develop future DCE Updates because SCE now assumes that it will use a third-party vendor to develop 22 44 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 167.
45 Given the ongoing analyses and the current uncertainty regarding the potential location and requirements for an acceptable alternative spent fuel storage site, the estimated cost to re-locate the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel to an alternative site are speculative and have not been included in the 2017 DCE.
46 Under the California Civil Procedure Code, a prevailing plaintiff in a mandamus proceeding is entitled to seek recovery of attorneys fees. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1021.5.
47 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 182.  


1 award. The estimate is approximately one-half the cost to procure a DGC for the major D&D work 2 because the scope of this effort is nearly half the scope of the DGC D&D work.
28 the DCE Updates instead of preparing them in-house at an average cost of approximately $0.3 million 1
3                  Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Extensions - The 2017 DCE includes costs of 4 $5.2 million44 (100% share, 2014 $) for SCE to obtain extensions for the Areva and Holtec CDPs.
(100% share, 2014 $) per update. Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to periodically 2
5 SCE holds a CDP to construct and operate the Areva ISFSI to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel until 6 November 2022, and a separate CDP to construct and operate the Holtec ISFSI to store SONGS 2&3 7 spent fuel until 2035. The 2017 DCE assumes SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions from the CCC 8 for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 2022 and 2035, 9 respectively. SCE considered the recorded costs from past CDP applications and the complexities of the 10 anticipated issues that will require evaluation in these two CDP extensions to estimate the cost to obtain 11 these two CDP extensions.
revise the DCEs and submit them to the Commission.
12                  ISFSI CDP Settlement - As part of the ISFSI CDP Settlement, SCE agreed to incur up to 13 $4.0 million (100% share, nominal $) on commercially reasonable efforts to identify an offsite location 14 for SONGS spent fuel storage. SCE also included $0.3 million (100% share, nominal $) for SCE 15 outside counsel legal costs to reach the settlement.45 SCE also included $0.8 million (100% share, 16 nominal $) for attorneys fees to plaintiffs counsel, as agreed to in the settlement.46 This $5.1 million 17 (100% share, nominal $) increase was unforeseeable at the time the 2014 DCE was developed.
3 NIA Sump Modifications - The North Industrial Area (NIA) sump currently discharges 4
18 This cost category was shared between SONGS 1 and SONGS 2&3. The amount allocated to SONGS 19 2&3 is $4.3 million (100% share, 2014 $). The settlement allowed SCE to proceed with transferring 20 fuel to the ISFSI. It is also reasonable for SCE to explore offsite locations for the storage of spent fuel.
to the SONGS 2&3 dilution water system. Because SDS will remove the dilution water system, the 5
21                  Future DCE Updates - SCE assumes a cost of $3.7 million47 (100% share, 2014 $) to 22 develop future DCE Updates because SCE now assumes that it will use a third-party vendor to develop 44  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 167.
discharge path for the NIA sump must be modified. SCE provided an estimated cost of $1.1 million48 6
45  Given the ongoing analyses and the current uncertainty regarding the potential location and requirements for an acceptable alternative spent fuel storage site, the estimated cost to re-locate the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel to an alternative site are speculative and have not been included in the 2017 DCE.
(100% share, 2014 $) for this work scope.
46  Under the California Civil Procedure Code, a prevailing plaintiff in a mandamus proceeding is entitled to seek recovery of attorneys fees. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1021.5.
7 Relative to the 2014 DCE, the cost increases for Other Distributed Projects described 8
47  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 182.
above are partially offset by the lower estimated cost to dispose of GTCC waste, and result in a net 9
27
increase of $26.7 million (100% share, 2014 $). The Commission should find the increased estimated 10 costs for the Other Distributed Projects reasonable because each of these projects is required to fulfill an 11 unavoidable regulatory requirement or a contractual obligation.
12
: 7.
Greater Than Class C (GTCC) Waste Storage 13 In the 2017 DCE, SCE assumes that it will be required to license and purchase ten new 14 canisters for storing and disposing of GTCC waste from SONGS 2&3 D&D activities and will use two 15 existing Areva canisters for storing GTCC waste from the spent fuel pools. In contrast, SCE assumed in 16 the 2014 DCE that it would use the ten Areva canisters that were originally fabricated for storing and 17 disposing spent fuel from SONGS 2&3. SCE made this change because, although the ten Areva 18 canisters are licensed for storing and transporting spent fuel, they are not licensed for transporting 19 GTCC waste.49 Although the radiological and physical characteristics of spent fuel would seem to 20 bound those of GTCC waste, SCE determined that the canisters may only be used for their intended (and 21 licensed) purpose, and that they would need to be re-licensed before they could be used to store and 22 transport GTCC waste. Because most of the GTCC waste generated at SONGS 2&3 will come from the 23 reactor vessel internals segmentation project, which is scheduled near the beginning of D&D activities, 24 and the time required to re-license the Areva canisters is uncertain, SCE determined that it would be 25 48 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 192.
49 The canisters can be used to store GTCC waste as long as the canister does not need to be modified. For these ten canisters, the canisters would need to be modified to store the GTCC from D&D activities.


1 the DCE Updates instead of preparing them in-house at an average cost of approximately $0.3 million 2 (100% share, 2014 $) per update. Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to periodically 3 revise the DCEs and submit them to the Commission.
29 imprudent to risk an unknown delay to the D&D schedule by allowing it to be constrained by an effort 1
4                NIA Sump Modifications - The North Industrial Area (NIA) sump currently discharges 5 to the SONGS 2&3 dilution water system. Because SDS will remove the dilution water system, the 6 discharge path for the NIA sump must be modified. SCE provided an estimated cost of $1.1 million48 7 (100% share, 2014 $) for this work scope.
to re-license the Areva canisters. SCE determined that it would instead be more prudent to avoid such 2
8                Relative to the 2014 DCE, the cost increases for Other Distributed Projects described 9 above are partially offset by the lower estimated cost to dispose of GTCC waste, and result in a net 10 increase of $26.7 million (100% share, 2014 $). The Commission should find the increased estimated 11 costs for the Other Distributed Projects reasonable because each of these projects is required to fulfill an 12 unavoidable regulatory requirement or a contractual obligation.
schedule uncertainties by obtaining ten new canisters that would already be licensed to store and 3
13        7.      Greater Than Class C (GTCC) Waste Storage 14                In the 2017 DCE, SCE assumes that it will be required to license and purchase ten new 15 canisters for storing and disposing of GTCC waste from SONGS 2&3 D&D activities and will use two 16 existing Areva canisters for storing GTCC waste from the spent fuel pools. In contrast, SCE assumed in 17 the 2014 DCE that it would use the ten Areva canisters that were originally fabricated for storing and 18 disposing spent fuel from SONGS 2&3. SCE made this change because, although the ten Areva 19 canisters are licensed for storing and transporting spent fuel, they are not licensed for transporting 20 GTCC waste.49 Although the radiological and physical characteristics of spent fuel would seem to 21 bound those of GTCC waste, SCE determined that the canisters may only be used for their intended (and 22 licensed) purpose, and that they would need to be re-licensed before they could be used to store and 23 transport GTCC waste. Because most of the GTCC waste generated at SONGS 2&3 will come from the 24 reactor vessel internals segmentation project, which is scheduled near the beginning of D&D activities, 25 and the time required to re-license the Areva canisters is uncertain, SCE determined that it would be 48  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 192.
transport GTCC waste.
49  The canisters can be used to store GTCC waste as long as the canister does not need to be modified. For these ten canisters, the canisters would need to be modified to store the GTCC from D&D activities.
4 The estimated cost for GTCC storage in the 2017 DCE is $26.6 million (100% share, 5
28
2014 $). The 2014 DCE did not include any costs for GTCC storage. This resulted in a cost increase of 6
 
$26.6 million50 (100% share, 2014 $). Nevertheless, the Commission should find this estimated cost 7
1 imprudent to risk an unknown delay to the D&D schedule by allowing it to be constrained by an effort 2 to re-license the Areva canisters. SCE determined that it would instead be more prudent to avoid such 3 schedule uncertainties by obtaining ten new canisters that would already be licensed to store and 4 transport GTCC waste.
increase reasonable because it will reduce the risk of substantially greater costs due to potential project 8
5                The estimated cost for GTCC storage in the 2017 DCE is $26.6 million (100% share, 6 2014 $). The 2014 DCE did not include any costs for GTCC storage. This resulted in a cost increase of 7 $26.6 million50 (100% share, 2014 $). Nevertheless, the Commission should find this estimated cost 8 increase reasonable because it will reduce the risk of substantially greater costs due to potential project 9 delays resulting from a delay to re-license the Areva canisters for GTCC waste storage and disposal.
delays resulting from a delay to re-license the Areva canisters for GTCC waste storage and disposal.
10          8. Plant Easement/Lease Renewals 11                SCE uses the land upon which the SONGS site is located pursuant to a grant of easement 12 executed with the Navy in 1964. This easement expires in 2024. The Navy has informed SCE that the 13 existing easement will not be renewed because the terms are outdated; therefore, a new real estate 14 authorization will be negotiated. SCE anticipates that the new real estate authorization will: (1) modify 15 land boundaries to exclude roads used by the public, exclude lands within the current easements that 16 SCE does not use, include Parcels 8 and 9, and include lands that SCE occupies that are not within the 17 current easements; and (2) include pricing that is consistent with the current fair market rental value of 18 the property. The Navy will be required to perform a limited-scope NEPA review to issue this new real 19 estate authorization. The public interest in the Navys decision, mostly due to on-site spent fuel storage, 20 may impact the extent of the Navys NEPA review effort.
9
21                Due to the uncertainty of how long the spent nuclear fuel would be on-site and the 22 potential for relocation of the ISFSI in 2035, the 2017 DCE conservatively assumes that SCE will have 23 to negotiate real estate authorizations with the Navy two additional times. Therefore, the next real estate 24 authorization will expire in 2035, requiring SCE to seek a renewal. It is assumed the terms and site use 25 will remain the same, and that the term will also be 10 years. Thus, the cost for this effort is estimated 26 to be less than for the previous negotiation. This effort will also require a limited-scope NEPA review.
: 8.
50 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 169.
Plant Easement/Lease Renewals 10 SCE uses the land upon which the SONGS site is located pursuant to a grant of easement 11 executed with the Navy in 1964. This easement expires in 2024. The Navy has informed SCE that the 12 existing easement will not be renewed because the terms are outdated; therefore, a new real estate 13 authorization will be negotiated. SCE anticipates that the new real estate authorization will: (1) modify 14 land boundaries to exclude roads used by the public, exclude lands within the current easements that 15 SCE does not use, include Parcels 8 and 9, and include lands that SCE occupies that are not within the 16 current easements; and (2) include pricing that is consistent with the current fair market rental value of 17 the property. The Navy will be required to perform a limited-scope NEPA review to issue this new real 18 estate authorization. The public interest in the Navys decision, mostly due to on-site spent fuel storage, 19 may impact the extent of the Navys NEPA review effort.
29
20 Due to the uncertainty of how long the spent nuclear fuel would be on-site and the 21 potential for relocation of the ISFSI in 2035, the 2017 DCE conservatively assumes that SCE will have 22 to negotiate real estate authorizations with the Navy two additional times. Therefore, the next real estate 23 authorization will expire in 2035, requiring SCE to seek a renewal. It is assumed the terms and site use 24 will remain the same, and that the term will also be 10 years. Thus, the cost for this effort is estimated 25 to be less than for the previous negotiation. This effort will also require a limited-scope NEPA review.
26 50 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 169.  


1                  When the real estate authorization needs to be renewed again in 2045, SCE will request 2 the Navy to specify the final site restoration and substructure removal requirements. SCE currently 3 plans to commence this effort in 2040, such that the real estate authorization renewal and final site 4 restoration and substructure removal requirements would be in place by 2045. This would facilitate 5 performing the Substructure Removal civil works project during 2046-2049; and ISFSI 6 decommissioning, NRC license termination, and final site restoration during 2050-2051. Because this 7 real estate authorization renewal will identify the conditions under which the land will be returned to the 8 Navy, the Navy will be required to perform a more robust NEPA review.
30 When the real estate authorization needs to be renewed again in 2045, SCE will request 1
9                  In the 2017 DCE, the estimated cost for Plant Easement/Lease Renewals is $27.1 10 million51 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $1.4 million (100% share, 11 2014 $). This results in an increase of $25.7 million. The 2017 DCE includes costs for SCE labor, 12 contract support, Navy costs (such as consultations/review hours), surveys and mapping for three 13 distinct real estate authorizations and three corresponding NEPA reviews. At the time the 2014 DCE 14 was developed, discussions between SCE and the Navy had not yet progressed to that point that the need 15 for three such updates to the Navy real estate authorization and three NEPA reviews was identified.
the Navy to specify the final site restoration and substructure removal requirements. SCE currently 2
16                  Because each of these updates to the Navy real estate authorization and any 17 corresponding NEPA reviews will be required: (1) for SCE to fulfill the Navys requirements for 18 ongoing use of the SONGS site until SCE is ready to relinquish the land; (2) for the Navy to 19 appropriately analyze and identify the final site restoration requirements; and (3) for SCE to implement 20 the site restoration requirements to the satisfaction of the Navy, these Plant Easement/Lease Renewal 21 costs are necessary decommissioning costs. SCE based the estimate on its recent history negotiating real 22 estate matters with the Navy, as well as the costs incurred to date for SONGS real estate authorizations.
plans to commence this effort in 2040, such that the real estate authorization renewal and final site 3
23 Recent history with the Navy regarding the Mesa lease and the switchyard indicates that SCEs 24 negotiations with the Navy will involve a lengthy and more complex undertaking than assumed in the 25 2014 DCE. The Commission, therefore, should find that these estimated costs are reasonable.
restoration and substructure removal requirements would be in place by 2045. This would facilitate 4
51 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 185-187.
performing the Substructure Removal civil works project during 2046-2049; and ISFSI 5
30
decommissioning, NRC license termination, and final site restoration during 2050-2051. Because this 6
real estate authorization renewal will identify the conditions under which the land will be returned to the 7
Navy, the Navy will be required to perform a more robust NEPA review.
8 In the 2017 DCE, the estimated cost for Plant Easement/Lease Renewals is $27.1 9
million51 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $1.4 million (100% share, 10 2014 $). This results in an increase of $25.7 million. The 2017 DCE includes costs for SCE labor, 11 contract support, Navy costs (such as consultations/review hours), surveys and mapping for three 12 distinct real estate authorizations and three corresponding NEPA reviews. At the time the 2014 DCE 13 was developed, discussions between SCE and the Navy had not yet progressed to that point that the need 14 for three such updates to the Navy real estate authorization and three NEPA reviews was identified.
15 Because each of these updates to the Navy real estate authorization and any 16 corresponding NEPA reviews will be required: (1) for SCE to fulfill the Navys requirements for 17 ongoing use of the SONGS site until SCE is ready to relinquish the land; (2) for the Navy to 18 appropriately analyze and identify the final site restoration requirements; and (3) for SCE to implement 19 the site restoration requirements to the satisfaction of the Navy, these Plant Easement/Lease Renewal 20 costs are necessary decommissioning costs. SCE based the estimate on its recent history negotiating real 21 estate matters with the Navy, as well as the costs incurred to date for SONGS real estate authorizations.
22 Recent history with the Navy regarding the Mesa lease and the switchyard indicates that SCEs 23 negotiations with the Navy will involve a lengthy and more complex undertaking than assumed in the 24 2014 DCE. The Commission, therefore, should find that these estimated costs are reasonable.
25 51 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 185-187.  


1        9.      Offshore Conduits Removal 2                The 2017 DCE includes an estimated cost to perform the full removal of the 3 SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits as estimated in the 2014 DCE.
4                The 2017 DCE includes $91.6 million52 (100% share, 2014 $) to fully remove the 5 SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits. In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $96.0 million (100% share, 6 2014 $). This results in a decrease of $4.4 million. This decrease occurred because the estimated value 7 in the 2014 DCE includes a 5% adder for A&G, whereas the A&G adder is excluded from the 2017 8 DCE estimated value.
9        10. ISFSI Demolition 10                Following the removal of all spent fuel and GTCC waste by the DOE, SCE will demolish 11 and remove the ISFSI and perform activities necessary for the final restoration of the SONGS site.
12                The 2017 DCE includes $19.2 million53 (100% share, 2014 $) for ISFSI 13 decommissioning costs. In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $21.1 million (100% share, 2014 $).
14 This results in a decrease of $1.9 million. At the time the 2014 DCE was prepared, the specific plans to 15 expand the ISFSI had not been defined. Later in 2014, SCE entered into a contract with Holtec to 16 expand the ISFSI. The ISFSI demolition cost in the 2017 DCE is based on a new estimate completed by 17 High Bridge Associates and reflects both the Areva and Holtec ISFSIs.
18        11. Completed Projects 19                During the period between the permanent retirement of SONGS 2&3 on June 7, 2013, 20 and December 31, 2017, SCE completed several Distributed Projects. The following completed projects 21 are some of those already submitted to the Commission for reasonableness review:
22
* Included in 2014 reasonableness testimony: (1) Development of the Certified Fuel 23                    Handler Program; (2) Post-Fukushima Modifications; (3) Independent Spent Fuel 24                    Storage Installation (ISFSI) Pad Study; and (4) Spent Fuel Pool Analyses.54 52  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 229.
53  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 241.
54  The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2014 are explained in greater detail in A.16-03-004, Exhibit SCE-09 at pages 18-21.
31
31
: 9.
Offshore Conduits Removal 1
The 2017 DCE includes an estimated cost to perform the full removal of the 2
SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits as estimated in the 2014 DCE.
3 The 2017 DCE includes $91.6 million52 (100% share, 2014 $) to fully remove the 4
SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits. In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $96.0 million (100% share, 5
2014 $). This results in a decrease of $4.4 million. This decrease occurred because the estimated value 6
in the 2014 DCE includes a 5% adder for A&G, whereas the A&G adder is excluded from the 2017 7
DCE estimated value.
8
: 10.
ISFSI Demolition 9
Following the removal of all spent fuel and GTCC waste by the DOE, SCE will demolish 10 and remove the ISFSI and perform activities necessary for the final restoration of the SONGS site.
11 The 2017 DCE includes $19.2 million53 (100% share, 2014 $) for ISFSI 12 decommissioning costs. In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $21.1 million (100% share, 2014 $).
13 This results in a decrease of $1.9 million. At the time the 2014 DCE was prepared, the specific plans to 14 expand the ISFSI had not been defined. Later in 2014, SCE entered into a contract with Holtec to 15 expand the ISFSI. The ISFSI demolition cost in the 2017 DCE is based on a new estimate completed by 16 High Bridge Associates and reflects both the Areva and Holtec ISFSIs.
17
: 11.
Completed Projects 18 During the period between the permanent retirement of SONGS 2&3 on June 7, 2013, 19 and December 31, 2017, SCE completed several Distributed Projects. The following completed projects 20 are some of those already submitted to the Commission for reasonableness review:
21
* Included in 2014 reasonableness testimony: (1) Development of the Certified Fuel 22 Handler Program; (2) Post-Fukushima Modifications; (3) Independent Spent Fuel 23 Storage Installation (ISFSI) Pad Study; and (4) Spent Fuel Pool Analyses.54 24 52 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 229.
53 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 241.
54 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2014 are explained in greater detail in A.16-03-004, Exhibit SCE-09 at pages 18-21.


1
* Included in 2015 reasonableness testimony: (1) Nuclear Fuel Contracts 2                  Cancellations; (2) Legacy Radwaste Disposal; (3) Security Programs - Security 3                  Shutdown Strategy; (4) Regulatory Submittals; (5) Historical Site Assessment/Site 4                  Characterization; and (6) Transition Project Modifications - Special Purpose Vehicle 5                  (SPV) Feasibility Study.55 6              The following completed projects are being submitted for reasonableness review in this 7 proceeding:
8
* Major Projects completed during 2016-2017: (1) the Spent Fuel Islanding project; 9                  (2) Selection of Decommissioning General Contractor; and (3) Transition Project 10                  Modifications, including the Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification, Special 11                  Purpose Vehicle - Implementation, Records Retention Project, and the Simplification 12                  and Streamlining Project.56 13              The following completed activity will be submitted for reasonableness review in the 2021 14 NDCTP:
15
* Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR): Updates the current licensing basis for the 16                  decommissioning configuration state of SONGS 2&3 and is a reference available for 17                  reviewing decommissioning actions and plans affecting the SONGS 2&3 site.
18              The estimated costs for the Completed Projects are shown in Table IV-5 below:
55 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2015 are explained in greater detail in A.16-03-004, Exhibit SCE-08 at pages 26-39, and in Exhibits SCE-10 and SCE-10C.
56 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2016-2017 are explained in greater detail in A.18-03-XXX, Exhibit SCE-05.
32
32
* Included in 2015 reasonableness testimony: (1) Nuclear Fuel Contracts 1
Cancellations; (2) Legacy Radwaste Disposal; (3) Security Programs - Security 2
Shutdown Strategy; (4) Regulatory Submittals; (5) Historical Site Assessment/Site 3
Characterization; and (6) Transition Project Modifications - Special Purpose Vehicle 4
(SPV) Feasibility Study.55 5
The following completed projects are being submitted for reasonableness review in this 6
proceeding:
7
* Major Projects completed during 2016-2017: (1) the Spent Fuel Islanding project; 8
(2) Selection of Decommissioning General Contractor; and (3) Transition Project 9
Modifications, including the Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification, Special 10 Purpose Vehicle - Implementation, Records Retention Project, and the Simplification 11 and Streamlining Project.56 12 The following completed activity will be submitted for reasonableness review in the 2021 13 NDCTP:
14
* Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR): Updates the current licensing basis for the 15 decommissioning configuration state of SONGS 2&3 and is a reference available for 16 reviewing decommissioning actions and plans affecting the SONGS 2&3 site.
17 The estimated costs for the Completed Projects are shown in Table IV-5 below:
18 55 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2015 are explained in greater detail in A.16-03-004, Exhibit SCE-08 at pages 26-39, and in Exhibits SCE-10 and SCE-10C.
56 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2016-2017 are explained in greater detail in A.18-03-XXX, Exhibit SCE-05.


Table IV-5 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE Completed Projects (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
33 Table IV-5 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE Completed Projects (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
2017 DCE            2014 DCE Total              Total Description                (2014 $)            (2014 $)            Variance 1  2014 Reasonableness Review            $        0.6      $          0.6      $        (0.0) 2  2015 Reasonableness Review                    93.5                76.8                16.7 3  2018 Reasonableness Review                    27.2                19.2                8.0 4  Future Reasonableness Reviews                  2.0                  1.5                0.5 5  Completed Projects Total              $      123.3      $        98.1      $        25.2 1                The total estimated cost for these Distributed Projects, as reflected in the 2017 DCE, was 2 $123.3 million57 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the total estimated cost for the SONGS 2&3 3 decommissioning-related Completed Distributed Projects completed during 2013-2017 was $98.1 4 million (100% share, 2014 $), resulting in a variance of $25.2 million more than estimated.
The total estimated cost for these Distributed Projects, as reflected in the 2017 DCE, was 1
5 The explanations for the variances associated with each of these Distributed Projects are provided in the 6 testimony SCE provided to the Commission in its reasonableness review submittals for each of these 7 completed projects. The 2014 and 2015 completed projects are not being reviewed in this proceeding.
$123.3 million57 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the total estimated cost for the SONGS 2&3 2
8 C.     Undistributed Activities 9        1.     Contracted Services 10                Contracted Services are shorter-term supplemental resources, specialty contractors and 11 consultants, third-party services, materials, and supplies that are provided on an as-needed basis to 12 support SONGS. SCE must meet several NRC regulatory requirements,58 and maintain and operate 13 SONGS to support spent nuclear fuel in the spent fuel pools and ISFSI. SCE also must meet contractual 14 obligations and provide support services (such as engineering, regulatory, financial, and custodial 15 services) for the plant and the general facility,59 as well as provide basic office services, to complete 57 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 1, 12, 15, 18, and 24.
decommissioning-related Completed Distributed Projects completed during 2013-2017 was $98.1 3
58 See Exhibit SCE-01, Section 1.F.2.a, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Requirements.
million (100% share, 2014 $), resulting in a variance of $25.2 million more than estimated.
59 The general facility includes SONGS office buildings, roads, parking lots, fencing, lighting, and all the services necessary to maintain the site in a condition suitable for all the activities that are needed to decommissioning the plant.
4 The explanations for the variances associated with each of these Distributed Projects are provided in the 5
33
testimony SCE provided to the Commission in its reasonableness review submittals for each of these 6
completed projects. The 2014 and 2015 completed projects are not being reviewed in this proceeding.
7 C.
Undistributed Activities 8
: 1.
Contracted Services 9
Contracted Services are shorter-term supplemental resources, specialty contractors and 10 consultants, third-party services, materials, and supplies that are provided on an as-needed basis to 11 support SONGS. SCE must meet several NRC regulatory requirements,58 and maintain and operate 12 SONGS to support spent nuclear fuel in the spent fuel pools and ISFSI. SCE also must meet contractual 13 obligations and provide support services (such as engineering, regulatory, financial, and custodial 14 services) for the plant and the general facility,59 as well as provide basic office services, to complete 15 57 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 1, 12, 15, 18, and 24.
58 See Exhibit SCE-01, Section 1.F.2.a, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Requirements.
59 The general facility includes SONGS office buildings, roads, parking lots, fencing, lighting, and all the services necessary to maintain the site in a condition suitable for all the activities that are needed to decommissioning the plant.
Description 2017 DCE Total (2014 $)
2014 DCE Total (2014 $)
Variance 1
2014 Reasonableness Review 0.6 0.6 (0.0) 2 2015 Reasonableness Review 93.5 76.8 16.7 3
2018 Reasonableness Review 27.2 19.2 8.0 4
Future Reasonableness Reviews 2.0 1.5 0.5 5
Completed Projects Total 123.3 98.1 25.2


1 decommissioning planning and implement decommissioning. SCE utilizes Contracted Services for 2 these purposes.
34 decommissioning planning and implement decommissioning. SCE utilizes Contracted Services for 1
3                Contracted Services in the 2017 DCE consists of two distinct types of costs, recorded and 4 estimated:
these purposes.
5                3/4     June 2013-2017 recorded costs of $83.7 million (100% share, 2014 $) equaling an 6                        approximate annual average of $18.6 million (100% share, 2014 $);60 and 7                3/4     2018-2051 estimated costs of $141.5 million (100% share, 2014 $) reflecting an 8                        approximate annual average of $4.2 million (100% share, 2014 $).
2 Contracted Services in the 2017 DCE consists of two distinct types of costs, recorded and 3
9                The estimated cost for Contracted Services for 2018-2051 includes support activities for 10 the organizations shown in Table IV-6 below.
estimated:
Table IV-6 Contracted Services (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
4 3/4 June 2013-2017 recorded costs of $83.7 million (100% share, 2014 $) equaling an 5
2017 DCE          Annual 2018-2051    Average Over Total        2018-2051 Description                            (2014 $)        (2014 $)
approximate annual average of $18.6 million (100% share, 2014 $);60 and 6
1    Contracted Services (2018-2051) 2      Decommissioning Oversight                              $        50.9  $          1.5 3      Maintenance and Work Control                                    31.3              0.9 4      Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Nuclear Oversight                22.7              0.7 5      Site Engineering                                                13.8              0.4 6      Site Management & Administration                                10.7              0.3 7      Emergency Preparedness                                            6.3            0.2 8      Decommissioning Finance                                          4.8            0.2 9      Operations                                                        1.0            0.0 10    Contracted Services (2018-2051) Total                    $      141.5  $          4.2 11                SCE discusses each of these below:61 60 Recorded costs during 2014-2015 were reviewed for reasonableness in the 2015 NDCTP, A.16-03-004.
3/4 2018-2051 estimated costs of $141.5 million (100% share, 2014 $) reflecting an 7
approximate annual average of $4.2 million (100% share, 2014 $).
8 The estimated cost for Contracted Services for 2018-2051 includes support activities for 9
the organizations shown in Table IV-6 below.
10 Table IV-6 Contracted Services (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
SCE discusses each of these below:61 11 60 Recorded costs during 2014-2015 were reviewed for reasonableness in the 2015 NDCTP, A.16-03-004.
Recorded costs during 2016-2017 have been submitted for reasonableness review in this proceeding.
Recorded costs during 2016-2017 have been submitted for reasonableness review in this proceeding.
See Exhibit SCE-05.
See Exhibit SCE-05.
61 Each of these organizations also incurs common costs for items such as employment related training, office supplies, custodial support, and employment related travel expenses.
61 Each of these organizations also incurs common costs for items such as employment related training, office supplies, custodial support, and employment related travel expenses.
34
Description 2017 DCE 2018-2051 Total (2014 $)
Annual Average Over 2018-2051 (2014 $)
1 Contracted Services (2018-2051) 2 Decommissioning Oversight 50.9 1.5 3
Maintenance and Work Control 31.3 0.9 4
Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Nuclear Oversight 22.7 0.7 5
Site Engineering 13.8 0.4 6
Site Management & Administration 10.7 0.3 7
Emergency Preparedness 6.3 0.2 8
Decommissioning Finance 4.8 0.2 9
Operations 1.0 0.0 10 Contracted Services (2018-2051) Total 141.5 4.2


1
* Decommissioning Oversight - Contracted services include EPRI support, 2                          document governance, engineering consulting services, estimating services for 3                          supply chain, and radiation protection and environmental contract support.
4
* Maintenance/Work Control - Service vendor support to perform preventive and 5                          corrective maintenance on all electrical systems; mechanical systems; 6                          instrumentation and controls systems; other plant systems still in operation; and 7                          the seawall.
8
* Nuclear Oversight/Nuclear Regulatory Affairs - Consultants to support Nuclear 9                          Regulatory Affairs (NRA) interface with the NRC regarding SONGS 10                          compliance with regulatory requirements, and to support Nuclear Oversights 11                          execution of SONGS decommissioning quality assurance program (DQAP).
12
* Site Engineering - Software licenses, security computer maintenance, and 13                          consultants as required to resolve specific issues being faced.
14
* Site Management and Administration - Staffing consultant to determine 15                          appropriate SONGS staffing levels.
16
* Emergency Preparedness - Contractor support for planning functions that 17                          continue to be required by federal regulations as long as nuclear fuel is stored on-18                          site, including periodic drills to verify the effectiveness of the SONGS emergency 19                          preparedness program.
20                  The total estimated cost for Contracted Services in the 2017 DCE is $225.2 million62 21 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the total estimated cost for Contracted Services was 22 $34.6 million (100% share, 2014 $). This resulted in an increase of $190.6 million. The 2014 DCE 23 assumed Contracted Services would involve only office supplies, computers, and related equipment for 24 utility staff use, based upon an assumed cost of $10,500 per year per employee. SCE utilized this 25 category more broadly for the services and activities discussed above. Therefore, there is a variance 62  See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 287.
35
35
* Decommissioning Oversight - Contracted services include EPRI support, 1
document governance, engineering consulting services, estimating services for 2
supply chain, and radiation protection and environmental contract support.
3
* Maintenance/Work Control - Service vendor support to perform preventive and 4
corrective maintenance on all electrical systems; mechanical systems; 5
instrumentation and controls systems; other plant systems still in operation; and 6
the seawall.
7
* Nuclear Oversight/Nuclear Regulatory Affairs - Consultants to support Nuclear 8
Regulatory Affairs (NRA) interface with the NRC regarding SONGS 9
compliance with regulatory requirements, and to support Nuclear Oversights 10 execution of SONGS decommissioning quality assurance program (DQAP).
11
* Site Engineering - Software licenses, security computer maintenance, and 12 consultants as required to resolve specific issues being faced.
13
* Site Management and Administration - Staffing consultant to determine 14 appropriate SONGS staffing levels.
15
* Emergency Preparedness - Contractor support for planning functions that 16 continue to be required by federal regulations as long as nuclear fuel is stored on-17 site, including periodic drills to verify the effectiveness of the SONGS emergency 18 preparedness program.
19 The total estimated cost for Contracted Services in the 2017 DCE is $225.2 million62 20 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the total estimated cost for Contracted Services was 21
$34.6 million (100% share, 2014 $). This resulted in an increase of $190.6 million. The 2014 DCE 22 assumed Contracted Services would involve only office supplies, computers, and related equipment for 23 utility staff use, based upon an assumed cost of $10,500 per year per employee. SCE utilized this 24 category more broadly for the services and activities discussed above. Therefore, there is a variance 25 62 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 287.


1 between the DCEs because the 2014 DCE did not include forecasts for this broader group of services 2 and activities.
36 between the DCEs because the 2014 DCE did not include forecasts for this broader group of services 1
3                SCE developed the estimated Contracted Services costs in the 2017 DCE by analyzing 4 the costs incurred for these functions in 2013-2016, and then built them up throughout the remaining 5 decommissioning schedule (2018-2051) based on the anticipated future contracted services requirements 6 for the SONGS decommissioning organization. SCE only included the costs necessary to meet its 7 regulatory requirements related to the safe storage of spent fuel on-site; and to provide services required 8 to maintain the plant and general facility. As noted above, the annual requirements going forward are 9 substantially lower than those recorded during the initial decommissioning period and reflect the 10 changed conditions, including SCEs transition of certain work activities to the DGC. The Commission 11 should find that they are reasonable.
and activities.
12        2.     Service Level Agreements/A&G 13                Beginning in 2016, SONGS implemented annual intra-company Service Level 14 Agreements (SLAs) with SCE corporate service providers (e.g., HR, IT, Real Estate, Supply 15 Management, Treasurers, Environmental, and Controllers). Each SLA describes the specific 16 administrative and general (A&G) functions and services SCE provides to SONGS that support and 17 sustain the D&D activities. The SLAs meet the terms and conditions included in the Decommissioning 18 Agreement between SCE and the Participants.63 19                The 2014 DCE included an A&G adder (5.0%) that was applied to the costs of each DCE 20 line item to cover the costs of SCE corporate departments supporting SONGS decommissioning.
2 SCE developed the estimated Contracted Services costs in the 2017 DCE by analyzing 3
21 To maintain the integrity of the values referenced from the 2014 DCE in the variance explanations 22 provided elsewhere in this testimony (i.e., all other cost categories), SCE kept the 5% A&G adder with 23 each DCE line item in Table IV-2 above. This results in the value for the SLA/A&G in line 17 of 24 Table IV-2 being shown as zero dollars in the 2014 DCE column. Rather than comparing the 25 SLA/A&G amount included in the 2017 DCE to zero, it is more appropriate to compare it to the 63 Section 8.1.7.2 of the SONGS Decommissioning Agreement, dated April 23, 2015.
the costs incurred for these functions in 2013-2016, and then built them up throughout the remaining 4
36
decommissioning schedule (2018-2051) based on the anticipated future contracted services requirements 5
for the SONGS decommissioning organization. SCE only included the costs necessary to meet its 6
regulatory requirements related to the safe storage of spent fuel on-site; and to provide services required 7
to maintain the plant and general facility. As noted above, the annual requirements going forward are 8
substantially lower than those recorded during the initial decommissioning period and reflect the 9
changed conditions, including SCEs transition of certain work activities to the DGC. The Commission 10 should find that they are reasonable.
11
: 2.
Service Level Agreements/A&G 12 Beginning in 2016, SONGS implemented annual intra-company Service Level 13 Agreements (SLAs) with SCE corporate service providers (e.g., HR, IT, Real Estate, Supply 14 Management, Treasurers, Environmental, and Controllers). Each SLA describes the specific 15 administrative and general (A&G) functions and services SCE provides to SONGS that support and 16 sustain the D&D activities. The SLAs meet the terms and conditions included in the Decommissioning 17 Agreement between SCE and the Participants.63 18 The 2014 DCE included an A&G adder (5.0%) that was applied to the costs of each DCE 19 line item to cover the costs of SCE corporate departments supporting SONGS decommissioning.
20 To maintain the integrity of the values referenced from the 2014 DCE in the variance explanations 21 provided elsewhere in this testimony (i.e., all other cost categories), SCE kept the 5% A&G adder with 22 each DCE line item in Table IV-2 above. This results in the value for the SLA/A&G in line 17 of 23 Table IV-2 being shown as zero dollars in the 2014 DCE column. Rather than comparing the 24 SLA/A&G amount included in the 2017 DCE to zero, it is more appropriate to compare it to the 25 63 Section 8.1.7.2 of the SONGS Decommissioning Agreement, dated April 23, 2015.  


1 corresponding 5% A&G adder from the 2014 DCE. The number SCE calculated for the corresponding 2 5% A&G adder from the 2014 DCE for the period 2016-2051 is $160.8 million (100% share, 2014 $).
37 corresponding 5% A&G adder from the 2014 DCE. The number SCE calculated for the corresponding 1
3                The 2017 DCE incorporated the SLA costs to replace the A&G adders during the 2016-4 2028 period. Beginning in 2029, the 2017 DCE resumes applying the 5% A&G adder to all remaining 5 decommissioning costs until project completion in 2051. Under this approach, the 2017 DCE estimates 6 the cost of these SCE corporate functions at $168.2 million64 (100% share, 2014 $), an increase of $7.4 7 million, in comparison to the corresponding 5% adder noted above. Using the combination of SLAs and 8 A&G adder provides greater transparency and certainty of costs for the benefit of Participant oversight 9 and project cost control. The Commission should find the estimated costs for the SLAs/A&G adder 10 reasonable because they more accurately reflect the anticipated costs for these corporate support 11 functions.
5% A&G adder from the 2014 DCE for the period 2016-2051 is $160.8 million (100% share, 2014 $).
12        3.     DGC Staffing 13                DGC staff consists of SDS personnel who provide the project management of the D&D 14 work being performed by SDS, and manage/perform the programs and functions transferred from SCE 15 to SDS. Their project management function involves the continued planning, scheduling, and 16 monitoring of the D&D work as timely as possible while maintaining a safe work environment. It also 17 includes contracting with third party specialty vendors to complete specific tasks (e.g. RVI 18 segmentation), and administering those contracts. SCE provides oversight of SDSs project 19 management. This division of labor allows SDS and SCE to utilize their core competencies to complete 20 the work in an efficient manner - SDSs expertise in deconstructing facilities and SCEs oversight role.
2 The 2017 DCE incorporated the SLA costs to replace the A&G adders during the 2016-3 2028 period. Beginning in 2029, the 2017 DCE resumes applying the 5% A&G adder to all remaining 4
21 This cost category also includes staffing for a DGC that will be required during substructure removal 22 and ISFSI D&D/final site restoration to be performed during 2046-2051.
decommissioning costs until project completion in 2051. Under this approach, the 2017 DCE estimates 5
23                In the 2017 DCE, the estimated cost for DGC Staffing is $               65 (100% share, 24 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost for DGC Staffing was $423.6 million (100% share, 2014 64 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 381.
the cost of these SCE corporate functions at $168.2 million64 (100% share, 2014 $), an increase of $7.4 6
65 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 155 and 386.
million, in comparison to the corresponding 5% adder noted above. Using the combination of SLAs and 7
37
A&G adder provides greater transparency and certainty of costs for the benefit of Participant oversight 8
and project cost control. The Commission should find the estimated costs for the SLAs/A&G adder 9
reasonable because they more accurately reflect the anticipated costs for these corporate support 10 functions.
11
: 3.
DGC Staffing 12 DGC staff consists of SDS personnel who provide the project management of the D&D 13 work being performed by SDS, and manage/perform the programs and functions transferred from SCE 14 to SDS. Their project management function involves the continued planning, scheduling, and 15 monitoring of the D&D work as timely as possible while maintaining a safe work environment. It also 16 includes contracting with third party specialty vendors to complete specific tasks (e.g. RVI 17 segmentation), and administering those contracts. SCE provides oversight of SDSs project 18 management. This division of labor allows SDS and SCE to utilize their core competencies to complete 19 the work in an efficient manner - SDSs expertise in deconstructing facilities and SCEs oversight role.
20 This cost category also includes staffing for a DGC that will be required during substructure removal 21 and ISFSI D&D/final site restoration to be performed during 2046-2051.
22 In the 2017 DCE, the estimated cost for DGC Staffing is $
65 (100% share, 23 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost for DGC Staffing was $423.6 million (100% share, 2014 24 64 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 381.
65 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 155 and 386.  


1 $). This resulted in a decrease of $         million. This primarily reflects the result of the competitive 2 procurement process that resulted in the selection of SDS.
38
3        4. Labor-Staffing 4                SCE records costs for the SONGS utility staff and security force as undistributed labor.
$). This resulted in a decrease of $
5 The SONGS utility staff performs various decommissioning activities relating to state and federal 6 regulatory requirements, external communications with stakeholders, and strategic planning and 7 analysis. The utility staffs activities include complying with existing technical specifications; ensuring 8 the health and safety of the workers and the public; planning and preparing the facility for 9 decommissioning; retiring plant systems to minimize or eliminate costs; and keeping the public and 10 stakeholders informed on decommissioning progress. The security force protects SONGS in accordance 11 with NRC regulations 10 C.F.R. § 73 and 10 C.F.R. § 50.54, and has been sized to meet the current 12 design basis threat assessment, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 73.
million. This primarily reflects the result of the competitive 1
13                In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates that Labor-Staffing costs will be $986.2 million66 14 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, SCE estimated that Labor-Staffing costs would be $1,029.4 15 million (100% share, 2014 $). This resulted in a decrease of $43.2 million (100% share, 2014 $) relative 16 to the 2014 DCE. Now that SCE has four plus years of experience with the planning of 17 decommissioning, it is better able to identify the required staffing to safely carry out the 18 decommissioning of SONGS 2&3 and oversight of its contractors. The estimated staffing levels in the 19 2017 DCE were developed through a collaborative process between SONGS executive managers and 20 Kenrich. The staffing levels were subsequently vetted by ABZ. The Commission should find these 21 costs reasonable as they reflect the additional experience SCE has gained, have been reviewed by an 22 industry expert, and represent a well-supported estimate of the staffing levels required going forward.
procurement process that resulted in the selection of SDS.
23        5. All Other Non-Labor 24                Non-Labor costs include a wide range of decommissioning activities and obligations, 25 including the following:
2
66 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 265.
: 4.
38
Labor-Staffing 3
SCE records costs for the SONGS utility staff and security force as undistributed labor.
4 The SONGS utility staff performs various decommissioning activities relating to state and federal 5
regulatory requirements, external communications with stakeholders, and strategic planning and 6
analysis. The utility staffs activities include complying with existing technical specifications; ensuring 7
the health and safety of the workers and the public; planning and preparing the facility for 8
decommissioning; retiring plant systems to minimize or eliminate costs; and keeping the public and 9
stakeholders informed on decommissioning progress. The security force protects SONGS in accordance 10 with NRC regulations 10 C.F.R. § 73 and 10 C.F.R. § 50.54, and has been sized to meet the current 11 design basis threat assessment, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 73.
12 In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates that Labor-Staffing costs will be $986.2 million66 13 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, SCE estimated that Labor-Staffing costs would be $1,029.4 14 million (100% share, 2014 $). This resulted in a decrease of $43.2 million (100% share, 2014 $) relative 15 to the 2014 DCE. Now that SCE has four plus years of experience with the planning of 16 decommissioning, it is better able to identify the required staffing to safely carry out the 17 decommissioning of SONGS 2&3 and oversight of its contractors. The estimated staffing levels in the 18 2017 DCE were developed through a collaborative process between SONGS executive managers and 19 Kenrich. The staffing levels were subsequently vetted by ABZ. The Commission should find these 20 costs reasonable as they reflect the additional experience SCE has gained, have been reviewed by an 21 industry expert, and represent a well-supported estimate of the staffing levels required going forward.
22
: 5.
All Other Non-Labor 23 Non-Labor costs include a wide range of decommissioning activities and obligations, 24 including the following:
25 66 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 265.  


1
* Site Lease and Easement Expenses - SCE will be required to make annual easement 2  and lease payments to the Navy for the onshore plant site and SONGS Mesa facility 3  and to the CSLC for the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits until the easement and lease 4  agreements are terminated.
5
* Severance - Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to provide severance 6  benefits to SCE employees at SONGS whose jobs are eliminated as a result of the 7  permanent retirement of SONGS.
8
* Energy - SCE must purchase electrical energy at retail rates to power the SONGS 9  site.
10
* Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste to DOE - Under the DOE Standard Contract, 11  SCE is responsible for the cost to transfer spent fuel canisters from the ISFSI and 12  loading them into DOE shipping containers on-site, and then onto the DOEs 13  transportation device.
14
* Information Technology - SCE will be required to incur software and network 15  licenses, pay network service providers, and provide internal technical support to site 16  personnel at levels commensurate with site staffing until decommissioning is 17  completed.
18
* Third Party Legal - SCE retains outside counsel as necessary to handle legal matters 19  that require specific expertise or additional resources.
20
* Emergency Preparedness Fees - SCE provides funding to local jurisdictional 21  authorities for their radiological emergency preparedness, and will continue to do so 22  until all spent fuel has been removed from SONGS, under a memorandum of 23  understanding.
24
* NRC Fees - As holder of the NRC licenses for SONGS, SCE will be required to pay 25  10 C.F.R. Part 171 annual license fees and 10 C.F.R. Part 170 inspection fees until 26  the NRC licenses are terminated.
39
39
 
* Site Lease and Easement Expenses - SCE will be required to make annual easement 1
1
and lease payments to the Navy for the onshore plant site and SONGS Mesa facility 2
* Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies - After SDS completes the major D&D work, 2  SCE will re-assume responsibility for providing health physics supplies as required to 3   support the ISFSI-only staff.
and to the CSLC for the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits until the easement and lease 3
agreements are terminated.
4
4
* Community Engagement Panel - SCE has chartered a panel consisting of a group of 5   representatives from surrounding cities and counties to serve as a conduit of 6   information to the public and other stakeholders regarding decommissioning that 7  seeks to educate and explain SONGS decommissioning matters of interest to the local 8  public. SCE incurs costs to conduct quarterly CEP meetings at venues in the vicinity 9  of SONGS.
* Severance - Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to provide severance 5
10
benefits to SCE employees at SONGS whose jobs are eliminated as a result of the 6
* Environmental Permits and Fees - SONGS must comply with a variety of 11  environmental regulations and maintain several environmental permits that will 12   require periodic payments of fees.
permanent retirement of SONGS.
7
* Energy - SCE must purchase electrical energy at retail rates to power the SONGS 8
site.
9
* Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste to DOE - Under the DOE Standard Contract, 10 SCE is responsible for the cost to transfer spent fuel canisters from the ISFSI and 11 loading them into DOE shipping containers on-site, and then onto the DOEs 12 transportation device.
13
13
* ISFSI Aging Management -The facility maintenance and inspection activities for the 14   ISFSI, in compliance with the Areva and Holtec SARs, as will be determined by the 15   ISFSI Aging Management Program to be developed.
* Information Technology - SCE will be required to incur software and network 14 licenses, pay network service providers, and provide internal technical support to site 15 personnel at levels commensurate with site staffing until decommissioning is 16 completed.
16
17
* Security Related Expenses - As long as spent fuel remains on-site, the SONGS 17  security force will continue to require uniforms, weapons, ammunition, other supplies 18  and equipment, as well as background investigations, training, and vendor support.
* Third Party Legal - SCE retains outside counsel as necessary to handle legal matters 18 that require specific expertise or additional resources.
19
19
* DGC Executive Oversight Committee - a five person committee that provides 20   oversight and resolves contractual issues regarding the SDS contract. SCE and SDS 21   share the cost of three independent members on the committee.
* Emergency Preparedness Fees - SCE provides funding to local jurisdictional 20 authorities for their radiological emergency preparedness, and will continue to do so 21 until all spent fuel has been removed from SONGS, under a memorandum of 22 understanding.
22
23
* Insurance - NRC regulations require SCE to maintain minimum levels of nuclear 23  liability and property insurance until the spent fuel is removed from the SONGS site.
* NRC Fees - As holder of the NRC licenses for SONGS, SCE will be required to pay 24 10 C.F.R. Part 171 annual license fees and 10 C.F.R. Part 170 inspection fees until 25 the NRC licenses are terminated.
24  SCE also maintains general liability insurance and excess workers compensation 25  insurance.
26
 
40
40
 
* Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies - After SDS completes the major D&D work, 1
1
SCE will re-assume responsibility for providing health physics supplies as required to 2
* Association Fees and Expenses - NEI membership fees, and costs related to an 2   external Nuclear Oversight Board (NOB) and an outside advisor to SCEs Internal 3    Nuclear Management Group (INMG).
support the ISFSI-only staff.
4
3
* Water - SCE is required to purchase potable and service water for the SONGS Site.
* Community Engagement Panel - SCE has chartered a panel consisting of a group of 4
5
representatives from surrounding cities and counties to serve as a conduit of 5
* Office Space - During major D&D activities, SDS will demolish all existing office 6    space on the SONGS site and provide temporary office space as necessary.
information to the public and other stakeholders regarding decommissioning that 6
7   After Major D&D is completed, SCE will need to provide office space for the 8   remaining employees.
seeks to educate and explain SONGS decommissioning matters of interest to the local 7
public. SCE incurs costs to conduct quarterly CEP meetings at venues in the vicinity 8
of SONGS.
9
9
* Decommissioning Advisor - One or more outside consultants who provide subject 10   matter expertise regarding decommissioning regulatory issues, spent fuel storage, and 11   project management.
* Environmental Permits and Fees - SONGS must comply with a variety of 10 environmental regulations and maintain several environmental permits that will 11 require periodic payments of fees.
12
12
* Ground Water Monitoring - SCE will be required to periodically sample, analyze, 13    and monitor the ground water beneath the SONGS site.
* ISFSI Aging Management -The facility maintenance and inspection activities for the 13 ISFSI, in compliance with the Areva and Holtec SARs, as will be determined by the 14 ISFSI Aging Management Program to be developed.
14 The estimated costs for Non-Labor are shown in Table IV-7 below:
15
* Security Related Expenses - As long as spent fuel remains on-site, the SONGS 16 security force will continue to require uniforms, weapons, ammunition, other supplies 17 and equipment, as well as background investigations, training, and vendor support.
18
* DGC Executive Oversight Committee - a five person committee that provides 19 oversight and resolves contractual issues regarding the SDS contract. SCE and SDS 20 share the cost of three independent members on the committee.
21
* Insurance - NRC regulations require SCE to maintain minimum levels of nuclear 22 liability and property insurance until the spent fuel is removed from the SONGS site.
23 SCE also maintains general liability insurance and excess workers compensation 24 insurance.
25
 
41
41
* Association Fees and Expenses - NEI membership fees, and costs related to an 1
external Nuclear Oversight Board (NOB) and an outside advisor to SCEs Internal 2
Nuclear Management Group (INMG).
3
* Water - SCE is required to purchase potable and service water for the SONGS Site.
4
* Office Space - During major D&D activities, SDS will demolish all existing office 5
space on the SONGS site and provide temporary office space as necessary.
6 After Major D&D is completed, SCE will need to provide office space for the 7
remaining employees.
8
* Decommissioning Advisor - One or more outside consultants who provide subject 9
matter expertise regarding decommissioning regulatory issues, spent fuel storage, and 10 project management.
11
* Ground Water Monitoring - SCE will be required to periodically sample, analyze, 12 and monitor the ground water beneath the SONGS site.
13 The estimated costs for Non-Labor are shown in Table IV-7 below:
14


Table IV-7 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE All Other Non-Labor (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
42 Table IV-7 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE All Other Non-Labor (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)
2017 DCE       2014 DCE Total         Total Description                      (2014 $)       (2014 $)       Variance 1 Non-Labor 2   Site Lease and Easement Expenses                 $      97.5   $        19.5   $      78.0 3   Severance                                               121.0         170.8           (49.8) 4   Energy                                                   84.7           50.2           34.5 5   Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE                   30.6               -          30.6 6   Information Technology                                   31.9             6.6           25.3 7   Third Party Legal                                         23.8               -          23.8 8   Emergency Preparedness Fees                               48.3           25.8           22.5 9   NRC Fees                                                 31.2           53.6         (22.4) 10   Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies                       3.7           25.8         (22.1) 11   Community Engagement Panel                               12.5           34.0         (21.5) 12   Environmental Permits and Fees                             6.7           27.1         (20.4) 13   ISFSI Aging Management                                   15.3               -          15.3 14   Security Related Expenses                                 11.8           18.8           (7.0) 15   DGC Executive Oversight Committee                           3.7             -            3.7 16   Insurance                                                 63.7           67.3           (3.6) 17   Association Fees and Expenses                               8.6           11.0           (2.4) 18   Water                                                     16.5           14.5             2.0 19   Office Space                                               1.7             -            1.7 20   Decommissioning Advisor                                     9.9           11.4           (1.5) 21   Ground Water Monitoring                                     0.5             -            0.5 22   Property Tax                                                 -          74.7         (74.7) 23   DGC Non-Labor                                                 -          35.9         (35.9) 24   Spent Fuel Maintenance                                       -            7.4           (7.4) 25   DAW Disposal                                                 -            3.9           (3.9) 26   Tools and Equipment                                           -            1.3           (1.3) 27 Non-Labor Total                                     $      623.6   $      659.6   $      (36.0) 1                In the 2017 DCE, Other Non-Labor costs are estimated at $623.6 million67 (100% share, 2 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, Other Non-Labor costs were estimated at $659.6 million (100% share, 67 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 375 (minus line 287 Contracted Services costs, which are discussed separately in Section IV.C.1).
In the 2017 DCE, Other Non-Labor costs are estimated at $623.6 million67 (100% share, 1
42
2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, Other Non-Labor costs were estimated at $659.6 million (100% share, 2
67 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 375 (minus line 287 Contracted Services costs, which are discussed separately in Section IV.C.1).
Description 2017 DCE Total (2014 $)
2014 DCE Total (2014 $)
Variance 1
Non-Labor 2
Site Lease and Easement Expenses 97.5 19.5 78.0 3
Severance 121.0 170.8 (49.8) 4 Energy 84.7 50.2 34.5 5
Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 30.6 30.6 6
Information Technology 31.9 6.6 25.3 7
Third Party Legal 23.8 23.8 8
Emergency Preparedness Fees 48.3 25.8 22.5 9
NRC Fees 31.2 53.6 (22.4) 10 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 3.7 25.8 (22.1) 11 Community Engagement Panel 12.5 34.0 (21.5) 12 Environmental Permits and Fees 6.7 27.1 (20.4) 13 ISFSI Aging Management 15.3 15.3 14 Security Related Expenses 11.8 18.8 (7.0) 15 DGC Executive Oversight Committee 3.7 3.7 16 Insurance 63.7 67.3 (3.6) 17 Association Fees and Expenses 8.6 11.0 (2.4) 18 Water 16.5 14.5 2.0 19 Office Space 1.7 1.7 20 Decommissioning Advisor 9.9 11.4 (1.5) 21 Ground Water Monitoring 0.5 0.5 22 Property Tax 74.7 (74.7) 23 DGC Non-Labor 35.9 (35.9) 24 Spent Fuel Maintenance 7.4 (7.4) 25 DAW Disposal 3.9 (3.9) 26 Tools and Equipment 1.3 (1.3) 27 Non-Labor Total 623.6 659.6 (36.0)


1 2014 $). This resulted in a decrease of $36.0 million. This net decrease reflects numerous offsetting 2 increases and decreases as explained below:68 3
43 2014 $). This resulted in a decrease of $36.0 million. This net decrease reflects numerous offsetting 1
* Site Lease and Easement Expenses - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $97.5 million69 4                      (100% share, 2014 $) for site lease and easement expenses, compared with $19.5 5                      million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $78.0 6                      million. SCE expects payments to the Navy to increase after the easement is 7                      renegotiated and the Navy resets the fees based on the current fair market rental value 8                      of the property.
increases and decreases as explained below:68 2
9
* Site Lease and Easement Expenses - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $97.5 million69 3
(100% share, 2014 $) for site lease and easement expenses, compared with $19.5 4
million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $78.0 5
million. SCE expects payments to the Navy to increase after the easement is 6
renegotiated and the Navy resets the fees based on the current fair market rental value 7
of the property.
8
* Severance - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $121.0 million70 (100% share, 2014 $)
* Severance - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $121.0 million70 (100% share, 2014 $)
10                      for employee severance costs, compared with $170.8 million (100% share, 2014 $) in 11                      the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of $49.8 million. SCE expects decreased 12                      severance costs because it has incurred lower than anticipated payouts to previously 13                      terminated SONGS employees. In addition, because many employees were 14                      reassigned to other positions within the company, they are no longer eligible for 15                      SONGS severance benefits.
9 for employee severance costs, compared with $170.8 million (100% share, 2014 $) in 10 the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of $49.8 million. SCE expects decreased 11 severance costs because it has incurred lower than anticipated payouts to previously 12 terminated SONGS employees. In addition, because many employees were 13 reassigned to other positions within the company, they are no longer eligible for 14 SONGS severance benefits.
16
15
* Energy - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $84.7 million71 (100% share, 2014 $) for 17                      energy costs compared with $50.2 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE, 18                      resulting in an increase of $34.5 million. This variance reflects an updated forecast of 19                      energy usage levels (at retail energy rates) during 2019-2028 based upon how SDS 20                      plans to perform D&D.
* Energy - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $84.7 million71 (100% share, 2014 $) for 16 energy costs compared with $50.2 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE, 17 resulting in an increase of $34.5 million. This variance reflects an updated forecast of 18 energy usage levels (at retail energy rates) during 2019-2028 based upon how SDS 19 plans to perform D&D.
21
20
* Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste to DOE - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates that 22                      the cost to transfer spent fuel canisters from the ISFSI into DOE shipping containers 68 SCE is not providing variance analyses for variances $7.0 million or when the 2017 DCE did not include costs for items included in the 2014 DCE.
* Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste to DOE - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates that 21 the cost to transfer spent fuel canisters from the ISFSI into DOE shipping containers 22 68 SCE is not providing variance analyses for variances $7.0 million or when the 2017 DCE did not include costs for items included in the 2014 DCE.
69 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 358.
69 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 358.
70 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 353.
70 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 353.
71 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 308.
71 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 308.  
43


1                    on-site, and then onto the DOEs transportation device, will be $30.6 million72 (100%
44 on-site, and then onto the DOEs transportation device, will be $30.6 million72 (100%
2                    share, 2014 $). The 2014 DCE did not include a line item for this cost.
1 share, 2014 $). The 2014 DCE did not include a line item for this cost.
3
2
* Information Technology - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $31.9 million73 (100%
* Information Technology - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $31.9 million73 (100%
4                    share, 2014 $) for IT costs, compared with $6.6 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 5                    2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $25.3 million. The increased cost is due in 6                    part to some one-time payments to network service providers in 2018. After payment 7                    of these costs, SCE expects that ongoing support costs will be reduced after 2019.
3 share, 2014 $) for IT costs, compared with $6.6 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 4
8
2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $25.3 million. The increased cost is due in 5
* Third Party Legal - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $23.8 million74 (100% share, 9                    2014 $) for third party legal expenses. This variance occurred because the 2014 DCE 10                    did not forecast these services as direct costs, but instead assumed that the costs were 11                    a part of overheads.75 The services provided by outside legal counsel are required to 12                    perform normal business functions as well as tasks required by the NRC, and state 13                    and local agencies.
part to some one-time payments to network service providers in 2018. After payment 6
14
of these costs, SCE expects that ongoing support costs will be reduced after 2019.
* Emergency Preparedness Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $48.3 million76 15                    (100% share, 2014 $) for emergency preparedness fees, compared with $25.8million 16                    (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $22.5 million.
7
17                    In the 2017 DCE, SCE anticipates that it will continue to incur emergency 18                    preparedness fees pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with local 19                    jurisdictional authorities until all spent fuel is removed from the SONGS site versus 20                    the assumption in the 2014 DCE that such payments would terminate when the spent 21                    fuel was removed from the pools.
* Third Party Legal - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $23.8 million74 (100% share, 8
72 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 361.
2014 $) for third party legal expenses. This variance occurred because the 2014 DCE 9
did not forecast these services as direct costs, but instead assumed that the costs were 10 a part of overheads.75 The services provided by outside legal counsel are required to 11 perform normal business functions as well as tasks required by the NRC, and state 12 and local agencies.
13
* Emergency Preparedness Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $48.3 million76 14 (100% share, 2014 $) for emergency preparedness fees, compared with $25.8million 15 (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $22.5 million.
16 In the 2017 DCE, SCE anticipates that it will continue to incur emergency 17 preparedness fees pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with local 18 jurisdictional authorities until all spent fuel is removed from the SONGS site versus 19 the assumption in the 2014 DCE that such payments would terminate when the spent 20 fuel was removed from the pools.
21 72 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 361.
73 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 325.
73 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 325.
74 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 336.
74 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 336.
75 Corporate support is provided by SCE from organizations other than SONGS (e.g., legal, treasurers, finance, IT, supply chain).
75 Corporate support is provided by SCE from organizations other than SONGS (e.g., legal, treasurers, finance, IT, supply chain).
76 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 303.
76 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 303.  
44


1
45
* Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $3.7 2                  million77 (100% share, 2014 $) for utility staff health physics supplies, compared with 3                  $25.8 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of 4                  $22.1 million. The decreased cost occurred because SDS will be performing the 5                  health physics functions for the major D&D work, and incurring the cost of its health 6                  physics supplies. SCE will re-assume responsibility for providing health physics 7                  supplies after the major D&D work is completed, as required to support the ISFSI-8                  only staff.
* Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $3.7 1
9
million77 (100% share, 2014 $) for utility staff health physics supplies, compared with 2
* Community Engagement Panel (CEP) - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $12.5 10                  million78 (100% share, 2014 $) for Community Engagement Panel expenses, 11                  compared with $34.0 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in 12                  a decrease of $21.5 million. The decreased cost occurred because SCE has incurred 13                  lower CEP costs than estimated in the 2014 DCE and expects similar CEP 14                  expenditures in the future.
$25.8 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of 3
15
$22.1 million. The decreased cost occurred because SDS will be performing the 4
health physics functions for the major D&D work, and incurring the cost of its health 5
physics supplies. SCE will re-assume responsibility for providing health physics 6
supplies after the major D&D work is completed, as required to support the ISFSI-7 only staff.
8
* Community Engagement Panel (CEP) - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $12.5 9
million78 (100% share, 2014 $) for Community Engagement Panel expenses, 10 compared with $34.0 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in 11 a decrease of $21.5 million. The decreased cost occurred because SCE has incurred 12 lower CEP costs than estimated in the 2014 DCE and expects similar CEP 13 expenditures in the future.
14
* NRC Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $31.2 million79 (100% share, 2014 $)
* NRC Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $31.2 million79 (100% share, 2014 $)
16                  for NRC fees, compared with $53.6 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE.
15 for NRC fees, compared with $53.6 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE.
17                  This resulted in a decrease of $22.4 million. The decreased estimated cost occurred 18                  because the NRC reduced its 10 C.F.R. Part 171 annual license fees, and SCE expects 19                  to incur lower NRC inspection costs under 10 C.F.R. Part 170 than previously 20                  estimated.
16 This resulted in a decrease of $22.4 million. The decreased estimated cost occurred 17 because the NRC reduced its 10 C.F.R. Part 171 annual license fees, and SCE expects 18 to incur lower NRC inspection costs under 10 C.F.R. Part 170 than previously 19 estimated.
21
20
* Environmental Permits and Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $6.7 million80 22                  (100% share, 2014 $) for environmental permits and fees, compared with 23                  $27.1 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of 24                  $20.4 million. The decreased estimated cost occurred primarily due to a reduction to 77 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 373.
* Environmental Permits and Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $6.7 million80 21 (100% share, 2014 $) for environmental permits and fees, compared with 22
$27.1 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of 23
$20.4 million. The decreased estimated cost occurred primarily due to a reduction to 24 77 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 373.
78 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 280.
78 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 280.
79 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 340.
79 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 340.
80 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 313.
80 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 313.  
45


1                  the annual NPDES Permit fees. Due to a reduction in the quantity of discharges from 2                  the plant associated with the permanent shutdown, SCE was able to negotiate with the 3                  SWRCB a reduction to the annual NPDES permit fees from $1.1 million per year to 4                  $0.2 million per year. In addition to the reduced NPDES fees, the other 5                  environmental fees (e.g., hazardous waste, pollution fees) were less than estimated in 6                  the 2014 DCE. The 2014 DCE was prepared before the impact of decommissioning 7                  on the fees assessed by various local and state agencies was determined.
46 the annual NPDES Permit fees. Due to a reduction in the quantity of discharges from 1
8
the plant associated with the permanent shutdown, SCE was able to negotiate with the 2
SWRCB a reduction to the annual NPDES permit fees from $1.1 million per year to 3
$0.2 million per year. In addition to the reduced NPDES fees, the other 4
environmental fees (e.g., hazardous waste, pollution fees) were less than estimated in 5
the 2014 DCE. The 2014 DCE was prepared before the impact of decommissioning 6
on the fees assessed by various local and state agencies was determined.
7
* ISFSI Aging Management - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $15.3 million81 (100%
* ISFSI Aging Management - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $15.3 million81 (100%
9                  share, 2014 $) for undistributed ISFSI Aging Management expenses. The 2014 DCE 10                  did not include a line item for this cost.
8 share, 2014 $) for undistributed ISFSI Aging Management expenses. The 2014 DCE 9
11                The total net variance for Other Non-Labor costs is a decrease of $36.0 million (100%
did not include a line item for this cost.
12 share, 2014 $). Because these estimated costs are necessary to complete decommissioning and reflect 13 SCEs experiences throughout four plus years of decommissioning and incurring these types of costs, 14 the Commission should find these estimated costs reasonable.
10 The total net variance for Other Non-Labor costs is a decrease of $36.0 million (100%
81 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 270.
11 share, 2014 $). Because these estimated costs are necessary to complete decommissioning and reflect 12 SCEs experiences throughout four plus years of decommissioning and incurring these types of costs, 13 the Commission should find these estimated costs reasonable.
46
14 81 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 270.  


1                                                    V.
47 V.
2                                               CONCLUSION 3        The 2017 DCE estimates that the total cost to decommission SONGS 2&3 will be $4,479 million 4 (100% share, 2014 $), an increase of approximately 1.5% over the 2014 DCE that the Commission 5 found reasonable in D.16-04-019.
1 CONCLUSION 2
6        In Chapter II of this testimony, SCE presented a detailed discussion of the methodology by 7 which the 2017 DCE was developed and the bases for its underlying assumptions. SCE also explained 8 that due to the existence of contract pricing for much of the decommissioning work, SCE was able to 9 reduce the overall contingency factor of the 2017 DCE from 25% to 17%. In Chapter III, SCE presented 10 the testimony of Mr. Nicholas Capik, the Managing Director of ABZ Incorporated, a major provider of 11 decommissioning cost estimates for U.S. nuclear facilities. Mr. Capik described the independent review 12 that he performed regarding the completeness and accuracy of the 2017 DCE. In Chapter IV, SCE 13 provided a detailed reconciliation of the 2017 DCE to the 2014 DCE, including detailed discussions of 14 significant cost changes between the two estimates.
The 2017 DCE estimates that the total cost to decommission SONGS 2&3 will be $4,479 million 3
15        Given SCEs thorough and detailed explanation of the 2017 DCE, SCE has met its burden to 16 demonstrate that the 2017 DCE is a reasonable estimate of SONGS 2&3 decommissioning costs, and 17 provides an appropriate basis for the Commission to evaluate the reasonableness of the 18 decommissioning costs. The Commission, therefore, should find the 2017 SONGS 2&3 DCE to be 19 reasonable.
(100% share, 2014 $), an increase of approximately 1.5% over the 2014 DCE that the Commission 4
47
found reasonable in D.16-04-019.
5 In Chapter II of this testimony, SCE presented a detailed discussion of the methodology by 6
which the 2017 DCE was developed and the bases for its underlying assumptions. SCE also explained 7
that due to the existence of contract pricing for much of the decommissioning work, SCE was able to 8
reduce the overall contingency factor of the 2017 DCE from 25% to 17%. In Chapter III, SCE presented 9
the testimony of Mr. Nicholas Capik, the Managing Director of ABZ Incorporated, a major provider of 10 decommissioning cost estimates for U.S. nuclear facilities. Mr. Capik described the independent review 11 that he performed regarding the completeness and accuracy of the 2017 DCE. In Chapter IV, SCE 12 provided a detailed reconciliation of the 2017 DCE to the 2014 DCE, including detailed discussions of 13 significant cost changes between the two estimates.
14 Given SCEs thorough and detailed explanation of the 2017 DCE, SCE has met its burden to 15 demonstrate that the 2017 DCE is a reasonable estimate of SONGS 2&3 decommissioning costs, and 16 provides an appropriate basis for the Commission to evaluate the reasonableness of the 17 decommissioning costs. The Commission, therefore, should find the 2017 SONGS 2&3 DCE to be 18 reasonable.
19


Appendix A Witness Qualifications
Appendix A Witness Qualifications  


1                       SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 2                    QUALIFICATIONS AND PREPARED TESTIMONY 3                                      OF JOSE LUIS PEREZ 4 Q. Please state your name and business address for the record.
A-1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 1
5 A. My name is Jose Luis Perez, and my business address is 2244 Walnut Grove Ave, Rosemead, 6    CA 91770.
QUALIFICATIONS AND PREPARED TESTIMONY 2
7 Q. Briefly describe your present responsibilities at the Southern California Edison Company.
OF JOSE LUIS PEREZ 3
8 A. I am a Principal Manager, Nuclear CPUC Regulatory Affairs and Compliance, in the Regulatory 9    Affairs Organization responsible for CPUC regulatory activities and financial planning &
Q.
10    analysis for SONGS issues.
Please state your name and business address for the record.
11 Q. Briefly describe your educational and professional background.
4 A.
12 A. I earned an MBA from the University of California, Irvine in 1997. I earned a Bachelor of 13    Science Degree in Civil Engineering from California State University, Long Beach in 1977. I 14    am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California. Since joining Edison in 1982, I 15    have held various management positions in nuclear generation business, finance, regulatory 16    affairs, planning & strategy, and project controls organizations. In addition, I have managed 17    various projects, including SONGS 1 decommissioning shortly after permanent shutdown and 18    industry restructuring financial analysis. Prior to joining Edison, my professional background 19    included various home office and jobsite positions in the civil engineering, nuclear power plant 20    start-up, and project controls organizations of Bechtel Power Corporation and the collection and 21    analysis of construction cost data for publication in cost estimating manuals for Marshall and 22    Swift Publications.
My name is Jose Luis Perez, and my business address is 2244 Walnut Grove Ave, Rosemead, 5
23 Q. What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?
CA 91770.
24 A. The purpose of my testimony in this proceeding is to sponsor Exhibit SCE-03: Testimony On 25    The 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for SONGS 2&3, as identified in the Table of 26    Contents thereto.
6 Q.
A-1
Briefly describe your present responsibilities at the Southern California Edison Company.
7 A.
I am a Principal Manager, Nuclear CPUC Regulatory Affairs and Compliance, in the Regulatory 8
Affairs Organization responsible for CPUC regulatory activities and financial planning &
9 analysis for SONGS issues.
10 Q.
Briefly describe your educational and professional background.
11 A.
I earned an MBA from the University of California, Irvine in 1997. I earned a Bachelor of 12 Science Degree in Civil Engineering from California State University, Long Beach in 1977. I 13 am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California. Since joining Edison in 1982, I 14 have held various management positions in nuclear generation business, finance, regulatory 15 affairs, planning & strategy, and project controls organizations. In addition, I have managed 16 various projects, including SONGS 1 decommissioning shortly after permanent shutdown and 17 industry restructuring financial analysis. Prior to joining Edison, my professional background 18 included various home office and jobsite positions in the civil engineering, nuclear power plant 19 start-up, and project controls organizations of Bechtel Power Corporation and the collection and 20 analysis of construction cost data for publication in cost estimating manuals for Marshall and 21 Swift Publications.
22 Q.
What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?
23 A.
The purpose of my testimony in this proceeding is to sponsor Exhibit SCE-03: Testimony On 24 The 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for SONGS 2&3, as identified in the Table of 25 Contents thereto.
26


1 Q. Was this material prepared by you or under your supervision?
A-2 Q.
2 A. Yes, it was.
Was this material prepared by you or under your supervision?
3 Q. Insofar as this material is factual in nature, do you believe it to be correct?
1 A.
4 A. Yes, I do.
Yes, it was.
5 Q. Insofar as this material is in the nature of opinion or judgment, does it represent your best 6    judgment?
2 Q.
7 A. Yes, it does.
Insofar as this material is factual in nature, do you believe it to be correct?
8 Q. Does this conclude your qualifications and prepared testimony?
3 A.
9 A. Yes, it does.
Yes, I do.
A-2
4 Q.
Insofar as this material is in the nature of opinion or judgment, does it represent your best 5
judgment?
6 A.
Yes, it does.
7 Q.
Does this conclude your qualifications and prepared testimony?
8 A.
Yes, it does.
9


1                                      ABZ, INCORPORATED 2                        QUALIFICATIONS AND PREPARED TESTIMONY 3                                        OF NICHOLAS J. CAPIK 4 Q. Please state your name and business address for the record.
A-3 ABZ, INCORPORATED 1
5 A. My name is Nicholas Joseph Capik, and my business address is 4451 Brookfield Corporate 6    Drive, Suite 107, Chantilly, VA 20151.
QUALIFICATIONS AND PREPARED TESTIMONY 2
7 Q. Who is your current employer?
OF NICHOLAS J. CAPIK 3
8 A. ABZ, Incorporated.
Q.
9 Q. Briefly describe your present responsibilities at ABZ.
Please state your name and business address for the record.
10 A. I am a Managing Director of ABZ. In that role, I am responsible for the management and 11    execution of numerous ABZ projects performed for the nuclear industry.
4 A.
12 Q. Briefly describe your educational and professional background.
My name is Nicholas Joseph Capik, and my business address is 4451 Brookfield Corporate 5
13 A. I earned an BS in Mathematics from the Pennsylvania State University in 1983. I completed the 14    Navy Nuclear Training Program in 1985. I served in the U.S. Navy from 1983 through 1991.
Drive, Suite 107, Chantilly, VA 20151.
15    Since 1991, I have been employed at ABZ. At ABZ, I have performed cost estimates for over 40 16    clients related to due diligence, decommissioning, accident cleanup, and site restoration. In this 17    role, I was responsible for the development of assumptions, the selection of scenarios, the 18    preparation of studies, and the presentation of results. I have supported litigation related to spent 19    fuel storage, and tax issues related to decommissioning. I have had oversight and involvement of 20    decommissioning activities at several nuclear facilities.
6 Q.
21 Q. What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?
Who is your current employer?
22 A. The purpose of my testimony in this proceeding is to sponsor portions of Exhibit SCE-03:
7 A.
23    Testimony On The 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for SONGS 2&3, as identified in the 24    Table of Contents thereto.
ABZ, Incorporated.
25 Q. Was this material prepared by you?
8 Q.
26 A. Yes, it was.
Briefly describe your present responsibilities at ABZ.
27 Q. Insofar as this material is factual in nature, do you believe it to be correct?
9 A.
A-3
I am a Managing Director of ABZ. In that role, I am responsible for the management and 10 execution of numerous ABZ projects performed for the nuclear industry.
11 Q.
Briefly describe your educational and professional background.
12 A.
I earned an BS in Mathematics from the Pennsylvania State University in 1983. I completed the 13 Navy Nuclear Training Program in 1985. I served in the U.S. Navy from 1983 through 1991.
14 Since 1991, I have been employed at ABZ. At ABZ, I have performed cost estimates for over 40 15 clients related to due diligence, decommissioning, accident cleanup, and site restoration. In this 16 role, I was responsible for the development of assumptions, the selection of scenarios, the 17 preparation of studies, and the presentation of results. I have supported litigation related to spent 18 fuel storage, and tax issues related to decommissioning. I have had oversight and involvement of 19 decommissioning activities at several nuclear facilities.
20 Q.
What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?
21 A.
The purpose of my testimony in this proceeding is to sponsor portions of Exhibit SCE-03:
22 Testimony On The 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for SONGS 2&3, as identified in the 23 Table of Contents thereto.
24 Q.
Was this material prepared by you?
25 A.
Yes, it was.
26 Q.
Insofar as this material is factual in nature, do you believe it to be correct?
27


1 A. Yes, I do.
A-4 A.
A-4
Yes, I do.
1


Appendix B Decommissioning Cost Estimate - Confidential
Appendix B Decommissioning Cost Estimate - Confidential  


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Prepared For:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Prepared For:
Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Prepared By:
Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Prepared By:
The Kenrich Group LLC 1919 M Street, NW Suite 620 Washington, DC 20036 January 26, 2018 Revised March 8, 2018 Christopher F. Tierney Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
The Kenrich Group LLC 1919 M Street, NW Suite 620 Washington, DC 20036 January 26, 2018 Revised March 8, 2018 Christopher F. Tierney Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
                          %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION OF MINOR REVISION Revision Number: 1 Effective Date: March 8, 2018 The revisions made to the 2017 SONGS 2&3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate are minor in nature and do not revise or otherwise impact the content or results of the cost estimate.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION OF MINOR REVISION Revision Number: 1 Effective Date: March 8, 2018 The revisions made to the 2017 SONGS 2&3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate are minor in nature and do not revise or otherwise impact the content or results of the cost estimate.
Line 349: Line 605:
Item 3 - Within Appendix C, Detailed Cost Tables, the notes to Appendix C have been attached.
Item 3 - Within Appendix C, Detailed Cost Tables, the notes to Appendix C have been attached.
Item 4 - The line numbers in Table 10, Utility & Security Force Average Staffing By Period, have been corrected.
Item 4 - The line numbers in Table 10, Utility & Security Force Average Staffing By Period, have been corrected.
                                                %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE  
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate i
TABLE OF CONTENTS I.
EXECUTIVE  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
..............................................................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................2 A. Purpose And Scope Of 2017 DCE ......................................................................................................... 2 B. Regulatory Framework........................................................................................................................... 5 C. SONGS Decommissioning Background ................................................................................................ 5 D. The Kenrich Group ................................................................................................................................ 6 III.
.............................................................................................................. 1 II.
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 2 A.
Purpose And Scope Of 2017 DCE......................................................................................................... 2 B.
Regulatory Framework........................................................................................................................... 5 C.
SONGS Decommissioning Background................................................................................................ 5 D.
The Kenrich Group................................................................................................................................ 6 III.


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF THE 2017 DCE ....................................................................................................7 A. General Approach .................................................................................................................................. 7 B. EnergySolutions 2014 DCE ................................................................................................................... 7 C. 2017 DCE Structure ............................................................................................................................... 9 IV.  
OF THE 2017 DCE.................................................................................................... 7 A.
General Approach.................................................................................................................................. 7 B.
EnergySolutions 2014 DCE...................................................................................................................7 C.
2017 DCE Structure............................................................................................................................... 9 IV.


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF 2017 DCE COSTS AND SCHEDULE .............................................................12 A. Summary Of 2017 DCE Recorded And Estimated Costs .................................................................... 12 B. Summary Of 2017 DCE By Period ...................................................................................................... 13 V. BASES OF ESTIMATE AND KEY ASSUMPTIONS ...............................................................15 A. General Principles ................................................................................................................................ 15 B. Key Facts And Assumptions ................................................................................................................ 15 C. Project Schedule................................................................................................................................... 19 D. Distributed Costs.................................................................................................................................. 19
OF 2017 DCE COSTS AND SCHEDULE............................................................. 12 A.
: 1. Completed Projects ................................................................................................................... 19
Summary Of 2017 DCE Recorded And Estimated Costs....................................................................12 B.
: 2. ISFSI And Fuel Transfer Operations......................................................................................... 20
Summary Of 2017 DCE By Period......................................................................................................13 V.
: 3. Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, And Disposal.................................................. 21
BASES OF ESTIMATE AND KEY ASSUMPTIONS............................................................... 15 A.
: 4. Substructure Removal................................................................................................................ 23
General Principles................................................................................................................................15 B.
: 5. Offshore Conduit Removal ........................................................................................................ 24
Key Facts And Assumptions................................................................................................................15 C.
: 6. ISFSI Demolition....................................................................................................................... 24
Project Schedule...................................................................................................................................19 D.
: 7. Final Site Restoration................................................................................................................ 24
Distributed Costs..................................................................................................................................19 1.
: 8. Other Distributed Projects ........................................................................................................ 25 E. Undistributed Costs .............................................................................................................................. 28
Completed Projects...................................................................................................................19 2.
: 1. Decommissioning Staffing ......................................................................................................... 30
ISFSI And Fuel Transfer Operations.........................................................................................20 3.
: 2. Undistributed Non-Labor Costs ................................................................................................ 33
Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, And Disposal..................................................21 4.
: 3. Service Level Agreements For Administrative & General Expenses......................................... 40
Substructure Removal................................................................................................................23 5.
: 4. DGC Staffing ............................................................................................................................. 40 F. 2017 DCE Costs By NRC Cost Category ............................................................................................ 41 G. Contingency ......................................................................................................................................... 42 VI. ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROJECT SCHEDULE .........................44 VII. WASTE DISPOSAL ......................................................................................................................46 VIII. REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................48 i
Offshore Conduit Removal........................................................................................................24 6.
                                                                      %
ISFSI Demolition.......................................................................................................................24 7.
Final Site Restoration................................................................................................................24 8.
Other Distributed Projects........................................................................................................25 E.
Undistributed Costs..............................................................................................................................28 1.
Decommissioning Staffing.........................................................................................................30 2.
Undistributed Non-Labor Costs................................................................................................33 3.
Service Level Agreements For Administrative & General Expenses.........................................40 4.
DGC Staffing.............................................................................................................................40 F.
2017 DCE Costs By NRC Cost Category............................................................................................41 G.
Contingency.........................................................................................................................................42 VI.
ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROJECT SCHEDULE......................... 44 VII. WASTE DISPOSAL...................................................................................................................... 46 VIII. REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 48  
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLES TABLE 1     2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY TABLE 2    
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate ii TABLES TABLE 1 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY TABLE 2  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF 2017 DCE TABLE 3    
OF 2017 DCE TABLE 3  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (NOMINAL/2017$)
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (NOMINAL/2017$)
TABLE 4    
TABLE 4  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (2014$)
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (2014$)
TABLE 5     ISFSI & FUEL TRANSFER OPERATIONS ESTIMATE TABLE 6     SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ESTIMATE TABLE 7     OTHER DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS ESTIMATE TABLE 8     UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$)
TABLE 5 ISFSI & FUEL TRANSFER OPERATIONS ESTIMATE TABLE 6 SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ESTIMATE TABLE 7 OTHER DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS ESTIMATE TABLE 8 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$)
TABLE 9     UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (2014$)
TABLE 9 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (2014$)
TABLE 10     UTILITY & SECURITY FORCE AVERAGE STAFFING BY PERIOD TABLE 11     UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$)
TABLE 10 UTILITY & SECURITY FORCE AVERAGE STAFFING BY PERIOD TABLE 11 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$)
TABLE 12     UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (2014$)
TABLE 12 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (2014$)
TABLE 13     UNDISTRIBUTED NON-LABOR COST ESTIMATE TABLE 14     SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (A&G) COST ESTIMATE TABLE 15     2017 DCE COSTS BY NRC COST CATEGORY TABLE 16     CONTINGENCY FACTORS APPLIED IN 2017 DCE TABLE 17     CONTINGENCY INCLUDED IN THE SONGS 2&3 2017 DCE TABLE 18     REMAINING WASTE DISPOSAL QUANTITIES FIGURES FIGURE 1     2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY FIGURE 2     ALIGNMENT OF 2017 DCE PERIODS TO DECOMMISSIONING MILESTONES APPENDICES APPENDIX A   SPENT FUEL SHIPPING SCHEDULE APPENDIX B   DETAILED PROJECT SCHEDULE APPENDIX C   DETAILED COST TABLES APPENDIX D   ANNUAL CASH FLOW TABLES BY NRC COST CATEGORY APPENDIX E   SHARE OF LIABILITY FOR SONGS PARTICIPANTS ii
TABLE 13 UNDISTRIBUTED NON-LABOR COST ESTIMATE TABLE 14 SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (A&G) COST ESTIMATE TABLE 15 2017 DCE COSTS BY NRC COST CATEGORY TABLE 16 CONTINGENCY FACTORS APPLIED IN 2017 DCE TABLE 17 CONTINGENCY INCLUDED IN THE SONGS 2&3 2017 DCE TABLE 18 REMAINING WASTE DISPOSAL QUANTITIES FIGURES FIGURE 1 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY FIGURE 2 ALIGNMENT OF 2017 DCE PERIODS TO DECOMMISSIONING MILESTONES APPENDICES APPENDIX A SPENT FUEL SHIPPING SCHEDULE APPENDIX B DETAILED PROJECT SCHEDULE APPENDIX C DETAILED COST TABLES APPENDIX D ANNUAL CASH FLOW TABLES BY NRC COST CATEGORY APPENDIX E SHARE OF LIABILITY FOR SONGS PARTICIPANTS
                                              %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Acronyms and Abbreviations APCD           Air Pollution Control District CCC           California Coastal Commission CoC           Certificate of Compliance CDP           Coastal Development Permit CEQA           California Environmental Quality Act CEP           Community Engagement Panel CFR           Code of Federal Regulations CPUC           California Public Utilities Commission CSLC           California State Lands Commission D&D           Decontamination & Dismantlement DCE           Decommissioning Cost Estimate DGC           Decommissioning General Contractor DOE           U.S. Department of Energy DTSC           California Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR/EIS       Environmental Impact Report/Statement GTCC           Greater Than Class C HP             Health Physics INMG           SCE Internal Nuclear Management Group ISFSI         Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation LLC           Limited Liability Company LLRW           Low-Level Radioactive Waste NDCTP         Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding NEI           Nuclear Energy Institute NEPA           National Environmental Policy Act NIA           North Industrial Area NOB           Nuclear Oversight Board NPDES         National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRC           U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PG&E           Pacific Gas and Electric Company PSDAR         Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report SAR           Safety Analysis Report SCE           Southern California Edison Company SDS           SONGS DecommissioningSolutions SONGS         San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station WBS           Work Breakdown Structure iii
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate iii Acronyms and Abbreviations APCD Air Pollution Control District CCC California Coastal Commission CoC Certificate of Compliance CDP Coastal Development Permit CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CEP Community Engagement Panel CFR Code of Federal Regulations CPUC California Public Utilities Commission CSLC California State Lands Commission D&D Decontamination & Dismantlement DCE Decommissioning Cost Estimate DGC Decommissioning General Contractor DOE U.S. Department of Energy DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR/EIS Environmental Impact Report/Statement GTCC Greater Than Class C HP Health Physics INMG SCE Internal Nuclear Management Group ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation LLC Limited Liability Company LLRW Low-Level Radioactive Waste NDCTP Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding NEI Nuclear Energy Institute NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NIA North Industrial Area NOB Nuclear Oversight Board NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company PSDAR Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report SAR Safety Analysis Report SCE Southern California Edison Company SDS SONGS DecommissioningSolutions SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station WBS Work Breakdown Structure  
                                              %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate I.       Executive Summary The 2017 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 (SONGS 2&3)
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 1
Decommissioning Cost Estimate (2017 DCE) has been prepared by the Kenrich Group LLC 1 (Kenrich) for Southern California Edison Company (SCE). 2 ABZ, Inc. (ABZ) also performed an independent review of the 2017 DCE.
I.
The 2017 DCE utilizes the same Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and selected distributed cost estimates included in the 2014 SONGS 2&3 DCE (2014 DCE) prepared by EnergySolutions, and essentially is an update to that DCE. The 2017 DCE will be submitted for review by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in the 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding (NDCTP). SCE will also submit certain information contained in the 2017 DCE to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for its review. 3 The 2017 DCE incorporates pricing from two significant contracts SCE has entered into for SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. In December 2014, SCE awarded a contract to Holtec International, Inc. (Holtec) to expand the SONGS Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) and transfer fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI (ISFSI Expansion and Fuel Transfer Operations contract). In December 2016, SCE entered into a contract with the companies that have formed a joint venture called SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS) 4, who will serve as the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) for major decontamination and dismantlement (D&D) activities. The ISFSI expansion project is in process, with transfer of spent fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI planned to commence in 2018.
Executive Summary The 2017 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 (SONGS 2&3)
Decommissioning Cost Estimate (2017 DCE) has been prepared by the Kenrich Group LLC1 (Kenrich) for Southern California Edison Company (SCE).2 ABZ, Inc. (ABZ) also performed an independent review of the 2017 DCE.
The 2017 DCE utilizes the same Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and selected distributed cost estimates included in the 2014 SONGS 2&3 DCE (2014 DCE) prepared by EnergySolutions, and essentially is an update to that DCE. The 2017 DCE will be submitted for review by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in the 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding (NDCTP). SCE will also submit certain information contained in the 2017 DCE to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for its review.3 The 2017 DCE incorporates pricing from two significant contracts SCE has entered into for SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. In December 2014, SCE awarded a contract to Holtec International, Inc. (Holtec) to expand the SONGS Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) and transfer fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI (ISFSI Expansion and Fuel Transfer Operations contract). In December 2016, SCE entered into a contract with the companies that have formed a joint venture called SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS)4, who will serve as the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) for major decontamination and dismantlement (D&D) activities. The ISFSI expansion project is in process, with transfer of spent fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI planned to commence in 2018.
SDS initially mobilized in January 2017, and is continuing to develop decommissioning plans and schedule. The DGC is currently expected to begin physical work in January 2019, following the approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) by the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The 2017 DCE incorporates the pricing from both of these contracts.
SDS initially mobilized in January 2017, and is continuing to develop decommissioning plans and schedule. The DGC is currently expected to begin physical work in January 2019, following the approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) by the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The 2017 DCE incorporates the pricing from both of these contracts.
In addition, the 2017 DCE incorporates and reflects recorded costs, new information, and experience gained from decommissioning activities SCE has completed since June 2013. Since announcing its decision in June 2013 to permanently retire SONGS 2&3, SCE has commenced preliminary decommissioning planning and performed other significant preparatory activities for 1
In addition, the 2017 DCE incorporates and reflects recorded costs, new information, and experience gained from decommissioning activities SCE has completed since June 2013. Since announcing its decision in June 2013 to permanently retire SONGS 2&3, SCE has commenced preliminary decommissioning planning and performed other significant preparatory activities for 1 Kenrich is a national management consulting firm with significant experience in power plant construction and decommissioning and in the energy industry more broadly in the United States and internationally.
Kenrich is a national management consulting firm with significant experience in power plant construction and decommissioning and in the energy industry more broadly in the United States and internationally.
2 Per the SONGS Decommissioning Agreement dated April 23, 2015, Southern California Edison is currently the Decommissioning Agent acting on behalf of itself and the three other SONGS 2&3 Participants, including San Diego Electric & Gas Company, the City of Riverside, and the City of Anaheim.
2 Per the SONGS Decommissioning Agreement dated April 23, 2015, Southern California Edison is currently the Decommissioning Agent acting on behalf of itself and the three other SONGS 2&3 Participants, including San Diego Electric & Gas Company, the City of Riverside, and the City of Anaheim.
3 In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(8)(v), the licensee must annually submit to the NRC by March 31 a financial assurance status report.
3 In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(8)(v), the licensee must annually submit to the NRC by March 31 a financial assurance status report.
4 The contract is between Southern California Edison Company and EnergySolutions Services, Inc. and AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc., together the contractor, and referred to herein as SDS.
4 The contract is between Southern California Edison Company and EnergySolutions Services, Inc. and AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc., together the contractor, and referred to herein as SDS.
1
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. The 2017 DCE incorporates recorded costs through September 2017 associated with these efforts.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 2
SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. The 2017 DCE incorporates recorded costs through September 2017 associated with these efforts.
The 2017 DCE for SONGS 2&3 is $4.702 billion in Nominal/2017 dollars. The 2014 DCE was $4.411 billion in 2014 dollars. For purposes of comparison to the 2014 DCE, the 2017 DCE expressed in 2014 dollars is $4.479 billion, which results in an approximate $68 million variance (less than 2%) between the two DCEs.
The 2017 DCE for SONGS 2&3 is $4.702 billion in Nominal/2017 dollars. The 2014 DCE was $4.411 billion in 2014 dollars. For purposes of comparison to the 2014 DCE, the 2017 DCE expressed in 2014 dollars is $4.479 billion, which results in an approximate $68 million variance (less than 2%) between the two DCEs.
II.     Introduction A.       Purpose And Scope Of 2017 DCE In accordance with the California Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning Act of 1985 (Act),
II.
Introduction A.
Purpose And Scope Of 2017 DCE In accordance with the California Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning Act of 1985 (Act),
SCE is required by the CPUC to update the SONGS 2&3 DCE every three years in connection with the NDCTP. The DCE is reviewed by the CPUC to determine the sufficiency of SCEs and San Diego Gas & Electric Companys (SDG&E) nuclear decommissioning trust funds, and the amount of customer contributions to those trust funds, if any are required. The DCE is also used in subsequent CPUC reasonableness reviews of actual decommissioning costs.
SCE is required by the CPUC to update the SONGS 2&3 DCE every three years in connection with the NDCTP. The DCE is reviewed by the CPUC to determine the sufficiency of SCEs and San Diego Gas & Electric Companys (SDG&E) nuclear decommissioning trust funds, and the amount of customer contributions to those trust funds, if any are required. The DCE is also used in subsequent CPUC reasonableness reviews of actual decommissioning costs.
On June 7, 2013, SCE announced its decision to cease power generation operations and permanently retire SONGS 2&3. 5 In 2014, SCE engaged EnergySolutions to evaluate decommissioning alternatives and assist in the development of a detailed project schedule and DCE to support the preparation and submittal of a Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(4)(i), which requires that a PSDAR be submitted [to the NRC] within two years following the permanent cessation of operations. 6 SCE submitted the PSDAR and 2014 DCE to the NRC on September 23, 2014 and to the CPUC on December 10, 2014. 7 The CPUC approved the 2014 DCE as reasonable in Decision (D.) 16-04-019 issued on April 21, 2016.
On June 7, 2013, SCE announced its decision to cease power generation operations and permanently retire SONGS 2&3.5 In 2014, SCE engaged EnergySolutions to evaluate decommissioning alternatives and assist in the development of a detailed project schedule and DCE to support the preparation and submittal of a Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(4)(i), which requires that a PSDAR be submitted [to the NRC] within two years following the permanent cessation of operations.6 SCE submitted the PSDAR and 2014 DCE to the NRC on September 23, 2014 and to the CPUC on December 10, 2014.7 The CPUC approved the 2014 DCE as reasonable in Decision (D.) 16-04-019 issued on April 21, 2016.
In 2017, SCE engaged Kenrich to prepare the 2017 DCE to reflect the actual costs and updated information and experience gained from SCEs decommissioning activities completed since June 2013. The 2017 DCE will be reviewed by the CPUC for the purposes identified above. New and updated information incorporated into the 2017 DCE includes: 8 5
In 2017, SCE engaged Kenrich to prepare the 2017 DCE to reflect the actual costs and updated information and experience gained from SCEs decommissioning activities completed since June 2013. The 2017 DCE will be reviewed by the CPUC for the purposes identified above. New and updated information incorporated into the 2017 DCE includes: 8 5 SONGS 1 has largely been decommissioned and the site it occupied is now referred to as the North Industrial Area, which includes the SONGS ISFSI.
SONGS 1 has largely been decommissioned and the site it occupied is now referred to as the North Industrial Area, which includes the SONGS ISFSI.
6 EnergySolutions, 2014 Decommissioning Cost Analysis of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3, September 5, 2014.
6 EnergySolutions, 2014 Decommissioning Cost Analysis of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3, September 5, 2014.
7 The NRC accepted the SONGS 2&3 PSDAR and found the 2014 Units 2&3 DCE estimate of $4.411 billion to be reasonable on August 20, 2015.
7 The NRC accepted the SONGS 2&3 PSDAR and found the 2014 Units 2&3 DCE estimate of $4.411 billion to be reasonable on August 20, 2015.
8 Information in this DCE is intended to be current as of approximately September 30, 2017.
8 Information in this DCE is intended to be current as of approximately September 30, 2017.
2
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate x The contract pricing for the contract awarded to Holtec International, Inc.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 3
(Holtec) for the ISFSI expansion and the transfer of spent fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI; x Contract value for the DGC contract awarded to SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS) for the decontamination and dismantlement of SONGS 2&3, and the removal and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste off the site; 9 x Recorded costs for decommissioning activities through September 30, 2017; x Revised U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) spent fuel acceptance date to reflect the DOEs continued failure to perform its contractual obligation to remove spent fuel from commercial nuclear reactors in the past four years; x Revised environmental permitting approval dates based on the current permitting status and the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CCCs CDP processes; x Revised project execution strategy to delay substructure removal until 2046; x Updated undistributed cost projections based on historical recorded costs and revised projections; x Updated ISFSI demolition costs to reflect the Holtec ISFSI pad; and x Additional costs not included in the 2014 DCE.
x The contract pricing for the contract awarded to Holtec International, Inc.
In sum, significant components of the 2017 DCE are now based on competitively bid contracts, as well as three additional years of experience managing a decommissioning plant and overseeing decommissioning personnel. Where new information was not available, Kenrich worked with SCE personnel and third-party consultants to validate and refine the 2014 DCE cost and schedule assumptions. Table 1 and Figure 1 below provide a summary of the 2017 DCE in nominal/2017 dollars 10 and in 2014 dollars.
(Holtec) for the ISFSI expansion and the transfer of spent fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI; x
Contract value for the DGC contract awarded to SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS) for the decontamination and dismantlement of SONGS 2&3, and the removal and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste off the site;9 x
Recorded costs for decommissioning activities through September 30, 2017; x
Revised U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) spent fuel acceptance date to reflect the DOEs continued failure to perform its contractual obligation to remove spent fuel from commercial nuclear reactors in the past four years; x
Revised environmental permitting approval dates based on the current permitting status and the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CCCs CDP processes; x
Revised project execution strategy to delay substructure removal until 2046; x
Updated undistributed cost projections based on historical recorded costs and revised projections; x
Updated ISFSI demolition costs to reflect the Holtec ISFSI pad; and x
Additional costs not included in the 2014 DCE.
In sum, significant components of the 2017 DCE are now based on competitively bid contracts, as well as three additional years of experience managing a decommissioning plant and overseeing decommissioning personnel. Where new information was not available, Kenrich worked with SCE personnel and third-party consultants to validate and refine the 2014 DCE cost and schedule assumptions. Table 1 and Figure 1 below provide a summary of the 2017 DCE in nominal/2017 dollars10 and in 2014 dollars.
9 See Appendix B for the schedule and activities for decontamination, and dismantlement.
9 See Appendix B for the schedule and activities for decontamination, and dismantlement.
10 The 2017 DCE presents recorded costs in nominal dollars and estimated (i.e., October 2017-2051) costs in 2017 dollars.
10 The 2017 DCE presents recorded costs in nominal dollars and estimated (i.e., October 2017-2051) costs in 2017 dollars.
3
%
                                                        %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 1 - 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY                 11, 12
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 4
($ IN THOUSANDS) 2017 DCE (Nominal/        2017 DCE Description                                    2017$)          (2014$)
TABLE 1 - 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY 11, 12
1    Recorded Costs (Through September 2017) 2    Remaining DGC and ISFSI Work Under Contract 3    Substructure Removal 4    ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration 5    Other Distributed Projects 6    Site Management and Oversight 7    Non-Labor and A&G 8    Total                                                              $ 4,702,264    $    4,478,566 FIGURE 1 - 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN MILLIONS OF 2017 DOLLARS)
FIGURE 1 - 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY
Site Management and Oversight Non-Labor and A&G              Recorded Costs (Through September 2017)
($ IN MILLIONS OF 2017 DOLLARS) 11 Totals in tables throughout this report may not tie due to rounding.
Other Distributed Projects Remaining DGC and ISFSI Work ISFSI Demolition                                              Under Contract and Final Site Restoration Substructure Removal 11 Totals in tables throughout this report may not tie due to rounding.
12 Of the $1,183,601 (nominal dollars) in recorded costs included in the 2017 DCE, $964,996 was recorded between June 2013 and December 2016, and $218,605 was recorded between January and September 2017 ($964,996 +  
12 Of the $1,183,601 (nominal dollars) in recorded costs included in the 2017 DCE, $964,996 was recorded between June 2013 and December 2016, and $218,605 was recorded between January and September 2017 ($964,996 +
$218,605 = $1,183,601).
$218,605 = $1,183,601).
4
Description 2017 DCE (Nominal/
                                                          %
2017$)
2017 DCE (2014$)
1 Recorded Costs (Through September 2017) 2 Remaining DGC and ISFSI Work Under Contract 3
Substructure Removal 4
ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration 5
Other Distributed Projects 6
Site Management and Oversight 7
Non-Labor and A&G 8
Total 4,702,264 4,478,566 Recorded Costs (Through September 2017)
Remaining DGC and ISFSI Work Under Contract Substructure Removal ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration Other Distributed Projects Site Management and Oversight Non-Labor and A&G
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate B.     Regulatory Framework SONGS 2&3 decommissioning is governed by the following NRC regulations:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 5
: 1. 10 C.F.R. Part 50 License - SCE holds a 10 C.F.R. Part 50 license for SONGS 2&3.
B.
Regulatory Framework SONGS 2&3 decommissioning is governed by the following NRC regulations:
1.
10 C.F.R. Part 50 License - SCE holds a 10 C.F.R. Part 50 license for SONGS 2&3.
SCE, as the license holder, must comply with all the requirements and standards of the Part 50 license. The Part 50 license authorizes SCE to store spent fuel on-site in wet storage (i.e., the spent fuel pool).
SCE, as the license holder, must comply with all the requirements and standards of the Part 50 license. The Part 50 license authorizes SCE to store spent fuel on-site in wet storage (i.e., the spent fuel pool).
: 2. 10 C.F.R. Part 72 License - SCE is required to hold a 10 C.F.R. Part 72 license in order to store fuel on-site in dry storage at the ISFSI. The current ISFSI Part 72 license is a general license set forth in 10 C.F.R. § 72.210 and requires the possession of a Part 50 license.
2.
: 3. 10 C.F.R. § 50.75(c) specifies the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for decommissioning planning and requires that the licensee provide adequate funding for termination of the Part 50 license.
10 C.F.R. Part 72 License - SCE is required to hold a 10 C.F.R. Part 72 license in order to store fuel on-site in dry storage at the ISFSI. The current ISFSI Part 72 license is a general license set forth in 10 C.F.R. § 72.210 and requires the possession of a Part 50 license.
: 4. 10 C.F.R. § 72.30 specifies the financial assurances and recordkeeping for decommissioning and requires that the licensee provide adequate funding for termination of the Part 72 license.
3.
: 5. 10 C.F.R. § 50.54(bb) requires the licensee to submit written notification to the NRC within two years following permanent cessation of operation of the reactor or five years before expiration of the operating license(s), whichever occurs first, for review and preliminary approval of the program by which the licensee intends to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor upon expiration of the reactor operating license until title to the irradiated fuel and possession of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy for its ultimate disposal in a repository. The 2014 DCE was submitted pursuant to this requirement.
10 C.F.R. § 50.75(c) specifies the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for decommissioning planning and requires that the licensee provide adequate funding for termination of the Part 50 license.
C.     SONGS Decommissioning Background SONGS is located in southern California on the shore of the Pacific Ocean, approximately 62 miles southeast of Los Angeles and 51 miles northwest of San Diego. The plant is located entirely within Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton on land owned by the U.S.
4.
10 C.F.R. § 72.30 specifies the financial assurances and recordkeeping for decommissioning and requires that the licensee provide adequate funding for termination of the Part 72 license.
5.
10 C.F.R. § 50.54(bb) requires the licensee to submit written notification to the NRC within two years following permanent cessation of operation of the reactor or five years before expiration of the operating license(s), whichever occurs first, for review and preliminary approval of the program by which the licensee intends to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor upon expiration of the reactor operating license until title to the irradiated fuel and possession of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy for its ultimate disposal in a repository. The 2014 DCE was submitted pursuant to this requirement.
C.
SONGS Decommissioning Background SONGS is located in southern California on the shore of the Pacific Ocean, approximately 62 miles southeast of Los Angeles and 51 miles northwest of San Diego. The plant is located entirely within Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton on land owned by the U.S.
Department of the Navy (Navy), except for the offshore intake and outfall conduits. SONGS 2&3 occupy approximately 53 acres of the 84-acre SONGS site. Approximately 16 acres are occupied by the North Industrial Area (NIA), formerly the SONGS 1 site, which is where the ISFSI is located. Additional SONGS support activities occurred on Navy property across Interstate 5 from the SONGS site, referred to as the Mesa site.
Department of the Navy (Navy), except for the offshore intake and outfall conduits. SONGS 2&3 occupy approximately 53 acres of the 84-acre SONGS site. Approximately 16 acres are occupied by the North Industrial Area (NIA), formerly the SONGS 1 site, which is where the ISFSI is located. Additional SONGS support activities occurred on Navy property across Interstate 5 from the SONGS site, referred to as the Mesa site.
SONGS 2&3 was a 2,250-megawatt nuclear generation facility consisting of two pressurized water reactors, which commenced operation in 1983 and 1984, respectively. On June 7, 2013, SCE announced plans to permanently retire SONGS 2&3. On June 12, 2013, SCE 5
SONGS 2&3 was a 2,250-megawatt nuclear generation facility consisting of two pressurized water reactors, which commenced operation in 1983 and 1984, respectively. On June 7, 2013, SCE announced plans to permanently retire SONGS 2&3. On June 12, 2013, SCE  
                                                  %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate submitted a Certification of Permanent Cessation of Power Operations to the NRC, certifying that SCE had permanently ceased power operations of SONGS 2&3, and surrendering SCEs authority to operate the units. SCE submitted to the NRC a Certification of Permanent Removal of Fuel for Unit 3 on June 28, 2013, and for Unit 2 on July 22, 2013. As a result of these submittals, SCE now holds an NRC license that does not permit power operations, but authorizes the possession of the SONGS facilities and licensed nuclear material.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 6
submitted a Certification of Permanent Cessation of Power Operations to the NRC, certifying that SCE had permanently ceased power operations of SONGS 2&3, and surrendering SCEs authority to operate the units. SCE submitted to the NRC a Certification of Permanent Removal of Fuel for Unit 3 on June 28, 2013, and for Unit 2 on July 22, 2013. As a result of these submittals, SCE now holds an NRC license that does not permit power operations, but authorizes the possession of the SONGS facilities and licensed nuclear material.
As noted above, SCE has completed preliminary planning and performed other significant preparatory activities associated with SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. These activities include: (1) expanding the on-site spent fuel dry storage facility (also referred to as the ISFSI) and beginning preparations to transfer fuel from the spent fuel pools to the ISFSI; (2) planning the major decontamination, dismantlement, demolition and disposal efforts; (3) selecting a DGC to complete major portions of the decommissioning project, including the decontamination and dismantlement of SONGS 2&3, and removal and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste from the site; (4) obtaining necessary approvals of various NRC license amendments now that SONGS 2&3 is permanently retired and being decommissioned; and (5) implementing various site projects to comply with regulatory requirements and other obligations, and prepare the site for major decommissioning activities.
As noted above, SCE has completed preliminary planning and performed other significant preparatory activities associated with SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. These activities include: (1) expanding the on-site spent fuel dry storage facility (also referred to as the ISFSI) and beginning preparations to transfer fuel from the spent fuel pools to the ISFSI; (2) planning the major decontamination, dismantlement, demolition and disposal efforts; (3) selecting a DGC to complete major portions of the decommissioning project, including the decontamination and dismantlement of SONGS 2&3, and removal and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste from the site; (4) obtaining necessary approvals of various NRC license amendments now that SONGS 2&3 is permanently retired and being decommissioned; and (5) implementing various site projects to comply with regulatory requirements and other obligations, and prepare the site for major decommissioning activities.
Along with these efforts, SCEs legal and environmental teams have been working to complete the CEQA process and obtain a CDP so that major decontamination and dismantlement work by SDS can begin.
Along with these efforts, SCEs legal and environmental teams have been working to complete the CEQA process and obtain a CDP so that major decontamination and dismantlement work by SDS can begin.
The current Grant of Easement for SONGS from the Navy is scheduled to expire May 11, 2024. Efforts to obtain a new real estate authorization from the Navy for the plant site are ongoing, and approval for the issuance of a new real estate authorization is expected by 2024.
The current Grant of Easement for SONGS from the Navy is scheduled to expire May 11, 2024. Efforts to obtain a new real estate authorization from the Navy for the plant site are ongoing, and approval for the issuance of a new real estate authorization is expected by 2024.
D.     The Kenrich Group Kenrich is a national management consulting firm with substantial experience in the public utility industry, nuclear power plant construction and decommissioning, and other commercial and public construction projects. Kenrich professionals have prepared and sponsored expert testimony with respect to cost and schedule analyses, project management, and economic damages before state and federal courts, domestic and international arbitration tribunals, and state utility commissions.
D.
Kenrich personnel have consulted with utilities for more than 30 years on a wide range of matters, including strategic planning and financial analyses to support management decision-making, reviews and investigations by state and federal regulatory commissions, and economic damages analyses in the context of business disputes. Kenrichs consultants include accountants, financial analysts, and engineers, and the firm typically focuses on complex and detailed accounting and financial issues, as well as cost and schedule performance on major projects, including nuclear power plant construction and decommissioning.
The Kenrich Group Kenrich is a national management consulting firm with substantial experience in the public utility industry, nuclear power plant construction and decommissioning, and other commercial and public construction projects. Kenrich professionals have prepared and sponsored expert testimony with respect to cost and schedule analyses, project management, and economic damages before state and federal courts, domestic and international arbitration tribunals, and state utility commissions.
6
Kenrich personnel have consulted with utilities for more than 30 years on a wide range of matters, including strategic planning and financial analyses to support management decision-making, reviews and investigations by state and federal regulatory commissions, and economic damages analyses in the context of business disputes. Kenrichs consultants include accountants, financial analysts, and engineers, and the firm typically focuses on complex and detailed accounting and financial issues, as well as cost and schedule performance on major projects, including nuclear power plant construction and decommissioning.  
                                                %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate III. Summary of the 2017 DCE A.     General Approach This 2017 DCE builds on the 2014 DCE, incorporating recorded costs through September 30, 2017; contract pricing for the ISFSI expansion contract awarded to Holtec in December 2014 and the DGC contract awarded to SDS in December 2016; site restoration costs estimated by third-party engineering firms; and revised SCE estimates for ongoing plant security and maintenance, and project oversight. Kenrich worked closely with SCE management and project oversight to develop the 2017 DCE. This DCE is generally consistent with the guidance provided in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.202, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 7
III.
Summary of the 2017 DCE A.
General Approach This 2017 DCE builds on the 2014 DCE, incorporating recorded costs through September 30, 2017; contract pricing for the ISFSI expansion contract awarded to Holtec in December 2014 and the DGC contract awarded to SDS in December 2016; site restoration costs estimated by third-party engineering firms; and revised SCE estimates for ongoing plant security and maintenance, and project oversight. Kenrich worked closely with SCE management and project oversight to develop the 2017 DCE. This DCE is generally consistent with the guidance provided in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.202, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors.
SCE retained ABZ, Incorporated (ABZ) to perform an independent review of the 2017 DCE. ABZ is a management consulting and engineering firm specializing in providing services related to decommissioning costs, scheduling, and spent fuel storage. ABZ has prepared decommissioning cost estimates for numerous nuclear plant owners, including an estimate of SONGS 2&3 decommissioning costs for SCE in 2013, shortly following the announcement of the permanent retirement of SONGS 2&3.
SCE retained ABZ, Incorporated (ABZ) to perform an independent review of the 2017 DCE. ABZ is a management consulting and engineering firm specializing in providing services related to decommissioning costs, scheduling, and spent fuel storage. ABZ has prepared decommissioning cost estimates for numerous nuclear plant owners, including an estimate of SONGS 2&3 decommissioning costs for SCE in 2013, shortly following the announcement of the permanent retirement of SONGS 2&3.
B.     EnergySolutions 2014 DCE In January 2014, SCE retained EnergySolutions to evaluate decommissioning alternatives and assist in the development of a detailed project schedule and DCE to support the preparation and submittal of a PSDAR in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(4)(i), which requires that a PSDAR be submitted to the NRC within two years following the permanent cessation of facility operations.
B.
EnergySolutions 2014 DCE In January 2014, SCE retained EnergySolutions to evaluate decommissioning alternatives and assist in the development of a detailed project schedule and DCE to support the preparation and submittal of a PSDAR in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(4)(i), which requires that a PSDAR be submitted to the NRC within two years following the permanent cessation of facility operations.
The 2014 DCE included the following three cost categories:
The 2014 DCE included the following three cost categories:
x   License Termination -- Decommissioning SONGS 2&3 to the extent required to terminate the plants operating license pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 50.75(c);
x License Termination -- Decommissioning SONGS 2&3 to the extent required to terminate the plants operating license pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 50.75(c);
x   Spent Fuel Management -- Post-shutdown management of spent fuel until acceptance by the DOE pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 50.54(bb) and ISFSI decommissioning pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 72.30; and x   Site Restoration -- Demolition of uncontaminated structures and restoration of the site in accordance with the Navy Grant of Easement and the California State Lands Commission (CSLC) requirements.
x Spent Fuel Management -- Post-shutdown management of spent fuel until acceptance by the DOE pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 50.54(bb) and ISFSI decommissioning pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 72.30; and x
Site Restoration -- Demolition of uncontaminated structures and restoration of the site in accordance with the Navy Grant of Easement and the California State Lands Commission (CSLC) requirements.
The 2014 DCE was prepared using a WBS to differentiate between these three major cost categories. The 2014 DCE included SCEs actual costs incurred from June 7, 2013 through December 31, 2013 and estimated costs thereafter.
The 2014 DCE was prepared using a WBS to differentiate between these three major cost categories. The 2014 DCE included SCEs actual costs incurred from June 7, 2013 through December 31, 2013 and estimated costs thereafter.
7
%
                                                %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate The 2014 DCE was based on the following technical approach to decommissioning:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 8
x   Prompt DECON decommissioning methodology; 13 x   Decommissioning would be performed by a DGC with oversight by the SONGS participants; x   Spent fuel would be transferred from the spent fuel pools and stored in Multi-Purpose Canisters at an on-site ISFSI; and 14 x   The DOE would begin accepting spent fuel from the nuclear industry in 2024 and complete the removal and acceptance of all spent fuel stored at SONGS by 2049.
The 2014 DCE was based on the following technical approach to decommissioning:
x Prompt DECON decommissioning methodology;13 x
Decommissioning would be performed by a DGC with oversight by the SONGS participants; x
Spent fuel would be transferred from the spent fuel pools and stored in Multi-Purpose Canisters at an on-site ISFSI; and14 x
The DOE would begin accepting spent fuel from the nuclear industry in 2024 and complete the removal and acceptance of all spent fuel stored at SONGS by 2049.
A dry transfer facility would not be necessary to transfer the spent nuclear fuel canisters to DOE transport canisters.
A dry transfer facility would not be necessary to transfer the spent nuclear fuel canisters to DOE transport canisters.
The 2014 DCE followed the approach originally presented in the Atomic Industrial Forum/National Environmental Studies Project Report AIF/NESP-036, Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates. The report was prepared in accordance with NRC Regulatory Guide 1.202, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors. The estimate was based on compliance with current regulatory requirements and proven decommissioning technologies.
The 2014 DCE followed the approach originally presented in the Atomic Industrial Forum/National Environmental Studies Project Report AIF/NESP-036, Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates. The report was prepared in accordance with NRC Regulatory Guide 1.202, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors. The estimate was based on compliance with current regulatory requirements and proven decommissioning technologies.
Line 478: Line 790:
The NRC staff reviewed the cost estimates against the guidance in RG 1.185, Section C.3 and finds that SCEs site-specific DCE and the costs of long-term storage of spent fuel for SONGS, Units 2 and 3, are considered reasonable, are described consistent with the guidance in RG 1.185, provide sufficient details 13 DECON is one of three basic methods for decommissioning defined by the NRC. Under the DECON method, the equipment, structures, and portions of the facility and site that contain radioactive contaminants are promptly removed or decontaminated to a level that permits termination of the Part 50 license after cessation of operations.
The NRC staff reviewed the cost estimates against the guidance in RG 1.185, Section C.3 and finds that SCEs site-specific DCE and the costs of long-term storage of spent fuel for SONGS, Units 2 and 3, are considered reasonable, are described consistent with the guidance in RG 1.185, provide sufficient details 13 DECON is one of three basic methods for decommissioning defined by the NRC. Under the DECON method, the equipment, structures, and portions of the facility and site that contain radioactive contaminants are promptly removed or decontaminated to a level that permits termination of the Part 50 license after cessation of operations.
14 The three options for long-term post-shutdown spent fuel management currently available to power plant operators are as follows: (1) wet storage consisting of continued maintenance and operation of the spent fuel pools; (2) dry storage consisting of transfer of spent fuel from the fuel pool to on-site dry storage modules after a cooling period; or (3) a combination of the two as is the present case at SONGS. Maintaining the spent fuel pool for an extended duration following cessation of operations would prevent the reduction of the Part 50 license and result in higher annual maintenance and operating costs than the dry storage alternative. Transfer of spent fuel to an ISFSI requires additional expenditures for purchase and construction of the ISFSI and dismantlement and disposal of the ISFSI following the completion of spent fuel transfer to the DOE.
14 The three options for long-term post-shutdown spent fuel management currently available to power plant operators are as follows: (1) wet storage consisting of continued maintenance and operation of the spent fuel pools; (2) dry storage consisting of transfer of spent fuel from the fuel pool to on-site dry storage modules after a cooling period; or (3) a combination of the two as is the present case at SONGS. Maintaining the spent fuel pool for an extended duration following cessation of operations would prevent the reduction of the Part 50 license and result in higher annual maintenance and operating costs than the dry storage alternative. Transfer of spent fuel to an ISFSI requires additional expenditures for purchase and construction of the ISFSI and dismantlement and disposal of the ISFSI following the completion of spent fuel transfer to the DOE.
8
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate associated with the funding mechanisms, and meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i). 15 C.       2017 DCE Structure The 2017 DCE utilizes the WBS that was established in the 2014 DCE, 16 and is estimated in 2017 dollars. Certain comparisons of the 2014 and 2017 DCEs are provided in 2014 dollars for ease of comparison. Costs were de-escalated from 2017 dollars to 2014 dollars using escalation factors provided by SCE.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 9
Consistent with the 2014 DCE, the 2017 DCE provides the total costs to decommission SONGS 2&3. The liability for the total decommissioning costs is shared between the SONGS participants. 17 As noted above, the 2014 DCE summarized the decommissioning costs by the License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration cost categories (as generally defined by the NRC). The costs were further summarized into sequential periods within each cost category. For the 2017 DCE, Kenrich revised the periods from the 2014 DCE and established common periods that include all cost categories to better align the estimated costs with SCEs current project schedule and to simplify cost and schedule reporting. 18 The 2017 DCE periods were designed to reflect the timing and completion of certain decommissioning milestones, including the completion of: (1) ISFSI fuel transfer operations; (2) mobilization and transition of various program activities (e.g. radiation protection program, maintenance, etc.) to SDS; and (3) major D&D phases of work defined in the DGC contract. 19 The completion of these milestones are expected to trigger certain reductions in staffing and undistributed costs. Figure 2 illustrates how the 2017 DCE periods align to the DGC contract and the completion of fuel transfer operations.
associated with the funding mechanisms, and meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i).15 C.
15 August 20, 2015 letter from NRC to SCE Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Mr. Thomas J. Palmisano (ADAM Accession No.: ML15204A383) 16 The DCE line numbers in Appendix C of this report align to the line numbers in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.
2017 DCE Structure The 2017 DCE utilizes the WBS that was established in the 2014 DCE, 16 and is estimated in 2017 dollars. Certain comparisons of the 2014 and 2017 DCEs are provided in 2014 dollars for ease of comparison. Costs were de-escalated from 2017 dollars to 2014 dollars using escalation factors provided by SCE.
Consistent with the 2014 DCE, the 2017 DCE provides the total costs to decommission SONGS 2&3. The liability for the total decommissioning costs is shared between the SONGS participants.17 As noted above, the 2014 DCE summarized the decommissioning costs by the License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration cost categories (as generally defined by the NRC). The costs were further summarized into sequential periods within each cost category. For the 2017 DCE, Kenrich revised the periods from the 2014 DCE and established common periods that include all cost categories to better align the estimated costs with SCEs current project schedule and to simplify cost and schedule reporting.18 The 2017 DCE periods were designed to reflect the timing and completion of certain decommissioning milestones, including the completion of: (1) ISFSI fuel transfer operations; (2) mobilization and transition of various program activities (e.g. radiation protection program, maintenance, etc.) to SDS; and (3) major D&D phases of work defined in the DGC contract.19 The completion of these milestones are expected to trigger certain reductions in staffing and undistributed costs. Figure 2 illustrates how the 2017 DCE periods align to the DGC contract and the completion of fuel transfer operations.
15 {{letter dated|date=August 20, 2015|text=August 20, 2015 letter}} from NRC to SCE Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Mr. Thomas J. Palmisano (ADAM Accession No.: ML15204A383) 16 The DCE line numbers in Appendix C of this report align to the line numbers in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.
The DCE line numbers in Appendix C of this report indicate the corresponding 2014 DCE: (1) NRC cost category, (2) 2014 DCE period, (3) cost type (i.e., distributed or undistributed), and (4) line number. For example, LT-2-D-2.17 in Appendix C of this DCE corresponds to License Termination Period 2, distributed cost line number 2.17 in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.
The DCE line numbers in Appendix C of this report indicate the corresponding 2014 DCE: (1) NRC cost category, (2) 2014 DCE period, (3) cost type (i.e., distributed or undistributed), and (4) line number. For example, LT-2-D-2.17 in Appendix C of this DCE corresponds to License Termination Period 2, distributed cost line number 2.17 in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.
17 The share of the liability for each of the SONGS Participants is provided in Appendix E.
17 The share of the liability for each of the SONGS Participants is provided in Appendix E.
18 While new periods are used to summarize the costs in this DCE, the underlying cost structure remains the same as the 2014 DCE and will facilitate cost reconciliations between the two estimates.
18 While new periods are used to summarize the costs in this DCE, the underlying cost structure remains the same as the 2014 DCE and will facilitate cost reconciliations between the two estimates.
19 The phases of work in the DGC contract are described in more detail in Section V.D.3 below.
19 The phases of work in the DGC contract are described in more detail in Section V.D.3 below.  
9
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate FIGURE 2 ALIGNMENT OF 2017 DCE PERIODS TO DECOMMISSIONING MILESTONES June 2019                                                                                                                          December 2051 December 2028                                          December 2049 Fuel Transfer                                                                                                                        Termination Of Partial Site                                        SONGS 2&3 Operations                                                                                                                                License Release                                              Substructure Complete Removal Complete 2014    2015    2016  2017    2018    2019    2020 2021 2022 2023  2024  2025 2026 2027  2028    2029  2030  2031  2032 2046  2047    2048  2049      2050        2051 Pd Period 1            Period 2                                Period 4                                    Period 5              Period 6                  Period 7 3
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 10 FIGURE 2 ALIGNMENT OF 2017 DCE PERIODS TO DECOMMISSIONING MILESTONES The activities in each of the 2017 DCE periods are described in more detail below.
Fuel Pool Operations                                                          Dry Fuel Storage Initial Activities Transition To D&D Major D&D Dry Storage Only Civil Works Project ISFSI Demo
                                                                                                                                                                  & FSR (Unit 1 Substructure Removal)
The activities in each of the 2017 DCE periods are described in more detail below.
Period 1 - Initial Activities (June 2013 - December 2016)
Period 1 - Initial Activities (June 2013 - December 2016)
Period 1 began on June 7, 2013 immediately following SCEs decision to permanently retire SONGS 2&3. As the decision was made approximately nine years before the units Part 50 operating licenses would have expired, SONGSs premature retirement was unexpected. SCE spent the following six months reducing its workforce and beginning to formulate plans for decommissioning. This period includes preliminary decommissioning planning, obtaining necessary approvals of NRC license amendments, commencing the expansion of its on-site ISFSI facility, and procuring a DGC. The end of this period aligns with the selection and award of the DGC contract to SDS in December 2016.
Period 1 began on June 7, 2013 immediately following SCEs decision to permanently retire SONGS 2&3. As the decision was made approximately nine years before the units Part 50 operating licenses would have expired, SONGSs premature retirement was unexpected. SCE spent the following six months reducing its workforce and beginning to formulate plans for decommissioning. This period includes preliminary decommissioning planning, obtaining necessary approvals of NRC license amendments, commencing the expansion of its on-site ISFSI facility, and procuring a DGC. The end of this period aligns with the selection and award of the DGC contract to SDS in December 2016.
Period 2 - Transition and Pool Storage (January 2017 - December 2018)
Period 2 - Transition and Pool Storage (January 2017 - December 2018)
Period 2 began with the mobilization of SDS in January 2017 and extends through December 2018, during which time SCE will transition responsibility of D&D-related site management and support functions at SONGS to SDS. In addition, SCE will complete the CEQA process with CSLC and obtain a CDP from the CCC. The CEQA process and CDP are required for SDS to begin major decontamination and dismantlement work. Other activities during Period 2 include the ongoing expansion of the on-site ISFSI facilities, and various other smaller projects. In addition, SCE currently anticipates that Holtec will begin transferring spent fuel from the wet storage pools adjacent to the reactors into dry storage at the expanded on-site ISFSI in 2018. The fuel transfer operations will continue into Period 3.
Period 2 began with the mobilization of SDS in January 2017 and extends through December 2018, during which time SCE will transition responsibility of D&D-related site management and support functions at SONGS to SDS. In addition, SCE will complete the CEQA process with CSLC and obtain a CDP from the CCC. The CEQA process and CDP are required for SDS to begin major decontamination and dismantlement work. Other activities during Period 2 include the ongoing expansion of the on-site ISFSI facilities, and various other smaller projects. In addition, SCE currently anticipates that Holtec will begin transferring spent fuel from the wet storage pools adjacent to the reactors into dry storage at the expanded on-site ISFSI in 2018. The fuel transfer operations will continue into Period 3.
10
2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 Period 1 Period 2 Pd 3
                                                                                      %
Period 4 Period 5 Period 6 Period 7 Transition To D&D Dry Storage Only Civil Works Project ISFSI Demo
& FSR (Unit 1 Substructure Removal)
Major D&D 2018 2019 Fuel Pool Operations Initial Activities June 2019 Fuel Transfer Operations Complete December 2028 Partial Site Release December 2049 SONGS 2&3 Substructure Removal Complete December 2051 Termination Of License Dry Fuel Storage
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Period 3 - D&D and Pool Storage (January 2019 - May 2019)
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 11 Period 3 - D&D and Pool Storage (January 2019 - May 2019)
Period 3 begins with SDSs mobilization to commence the major physical work to decontaminate and dismantle SONGS 2&3. SDSs initial work during this period will primarily focus on the segmentation and packaging of reactor internals. The completion of the transfer of all fuel from the operating spent fuel pools into dry storage at the on-site ISFSI marks the end of Period 3. After the SONGS spent fuel pools are empty, related systems needed for the spent fuel pools will be retired, and otherwise applicable plant programs associated with spent fuel management will be modified, allowing SCE to further reduce SONGS staffing.
Period 3 begins with SDSs mobilization to commence the major physical work to decontaminate and dismantle SONGS 2&3. SDSs initial work during this period will primarily focus on the segmentation and packaging of reactor internals. The completion of the transfer of all fuel from the operating spent fuel pools into dry storage at the on-site ISFSI marks the end of Period 3. After the SONGS spent fuel pools are empty, related systems needed for the spent fuel pools will be retired, and otherwise applicable plant programs associated with spent fuel management will be modified, allowing SCE to further reduce SONGS staffing.
Period 4 - D&D and Dry Storage (June 2019 - December 2028)
Period 4 - D&D and Dry Storage (June 2019 - December 2028)
Line 509: Line 821:
During Period 5, the primary activity at SONGS will be the ongoing maintenance and security of the on-site ISFSI and the transfer of all SONGS spent fuel to the DOE. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, SCE has assumed that the DOE will begin performing its obligations nationally in 2028, which means that the DOE would begin removing the SONGS 2&3 spent nuclear fuel from the on-site ISFSI in 2034 under the pick-up rates published in the DOEs July 2004 Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report. In addition, Period 5 includes the Navys National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review process, associated with amending the SONGS real estate authorization to establish the site restoration or end state requirements for SONGS to return the property to the Navy. SCE will also initiate a Request For Proposal (RFP) process for substructure removal work.
During Period 5, the primary activity at SONGS will be the ongoing maintenance and security of the on-site ISFSI and the transfer of all SONGS spent fuel to the DOE. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, SCE has assumed that the DOE will begin performing its obligations nationally in 2028, which means that the DOE would begin removing the SONGS 2&3 spent nuclear fuel from the on-site ISFSI in 2034 under the pick-up rates published in the DOEs July 2004 Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report. In addition, Period 5 includes the Navys National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review process, associated with amending the SONGS real estate authorization to establish the site restoration or end state requirements for SONGS to return the property to the Navy. SCE will also initiate a Request For Proposal (RFP) process for substructure removal work.
Period 6 - Civil Works Project (January 2046 - December 2049)
Period 6 - Civil Works Project (January 2046 - December 2049)
Period 6 begins with a contractor mobilizing in order to perform the remaining work to restore the SONGS site for its return to the Navy. This work includes removing all onshore below-grade man-made structures, with the exception of the North Industrial Area where the on-site ISFSI is located. This work is currently expected to span approximately four years and is scheduled to be completed in December 2049. During Period 6, the DOE will continue to remove the remaining SONGS spent fuel from the ISFSI. SCE assumes all fuel is removed by the DOE by December 2049, marking the end of this period and the commencement of Period 7, 11
Period 6 begins with a contractor mobilizing in order to perform the remaining work to restore the SONGS site for its return to the Navy. This work includes removing all onshore below-grade man-made structures, with the exception of the North Industrial Area where the on-site ISFSI is located. This work is currently expected to span approximately four years and is scheduled to be completed in December 2049. During Period 6, the DOE will continue to remove the remaining SONGS spent fuel from the ISFSI. SCE assumes all fuel is removed by the DOE by December 2049, marking the end of this period and the commencement of Period 7,  
                                                  %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate the demolition and removal of the ISFSI facilities and the final site restoration of the SONGS site.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 12 the demolition and removal of the ISFSI facilities and the final site restoration of the SONGS site.
Period 7 - ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration (January 2050 - December 2051)
Period 7 - ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration (January 2050 - December 2051)
After all of the spent fuel is removed from SONGS, SCE can begin the final decommissioning and site restoration activities. These activities include dismantling and disposing of the ISFSI, completing the final site restoration work, obtaining NRC approval to terminate the remaining license covering the ISFSI, and returning the property to the Navy. 20 SCE projects that all decommissioning activities will be completed by 2051, approximately two years after the removal of the last spent fuel from the SONGS ISFSI.
After all of the spent fuel is removed from SONGS, SCE can begin the final decommissioning and site restoration activities. These activities include dismantling and disposing of the ISFSI, completing the final site restoration work, obtaining NRC approval to terminate the remaining license covering the ISFSI, and returning the property to the Navy.20 SCE projects that all decommissioning activities will be completed by 2051, approximately two years after the removal of the last spent fuel from the SONGS ISFSI.
In addition, for purposes of the 2017 DCE, SCE has assumed that the offshore intake and outfall conduits will be excavated and removed during this period.
In addition, for purposes of the 2017 DCE, SCE has assumed that the offshore intake and outfall conduits will be excavated and removed during this period.
At the end of decommissioning in 2051, all above and below ground man-made improvements, including the seawall and the offshore intake and outfall conduits, will be removed, and the site will be re-graded, re-vegetated, and returned to the Navy.
At the end of decommissioning in 2051, all above and below ground man-made improvements, including the seawall and the offshore intake and outfall conduits, will be removed, and the site will be re-graded, re-vegetated, and returned to the Navy.
IV.     Summary Of 2017 DCE Costs And Schedule A.     Summary Of 2017 DCE Recorded And Estimated Costs SONGS has incurred $965.0 million (nominal dollars) through December 31, 2016 and estimates $3,737 million (2017 dollars) to complete decommissioning through 2051, for a total estimate of $4,702 million (Nominal/2017 dollars). The equivalent total in 2014 dollars is
IV.
Summary Of 2017 DCE Costs And Schedule A.
Summary Of 2017 DCE Recorded And Estimated Costs SONGS has incurred $965.0 million (nominal dollars) through December 31, 2016 and estimates $3,737 million (2017 dollars) to complete decommissioning through 2051, for a total estimate of $4,702 million (Nominal/2017 dollars). The equivalent total in 2014 dollars is  
$4,479 million. Table 2 below summarizes the 2017 DCE by cost category.
$4,479 million. Table 2 below summarizes the 2017 DCE by cost category.
20 The Units 2&3 ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration scope excludes the removal of the remaining Unit 1 foundations. The scope of the removal of the Unit 1 foundations is included in the Unit 1 DCE.
20 The Units 2&3 ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration scope excludes the removal of the remaining Unit 1 foundations. The scope of the removal of the Unit 1 foundations is included in the Unit 1 DCE.  
12
%
                                                      %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 2  
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 13 TABLE 2  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF 2017 DCE 21 22
OF 2017 DCE 21 22
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN THOUSANDS)
[A]              [B]          [C = A + B]          [D]
B.
Recorded        Estimate To    Total Estimate  Total Estimate Through 2016      Complete      At Completion    At Completion Description                  (Nominal $)        (2017$)    (Nominal /2017$)      (2014$)
Summary Of 2017 DCE By Period As discussed above, the 2017 DCE periods were designed to reflect the timing and completion of key decommissioning milestones that impact the cost estimate. The table below summarizes the 2017 DCE by period.
1 Distributed Projects 2  Completed Projects                        $      216,611  $        1,234  $        217,845 $        214,024 3  ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations                  140,047          142,385            282,432          270,210 4  Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal                  -
5  Other Projects                                    19,959          180,789            200,748          189,758 6  Substructure Removal                                    -        287,340            287,340          273,042 7  Offshore Conduit Removal                                -          96,039            96,039          91,631 8  ISFSI Demolition                                        -          20,229            20,229          19,171 9  Final Site Restoration                                  -            7,267            7,267            6,905 10  Distributed Subtotal 11 12  Undistributed Activities 13  Labor-Staffing                            $      336,628  $      696,304  $      1,032,932 $        986,172 14  Non-Labor                                        241,104          639,572            880,676          848,786 15  Service Level Agreements                          10,647          166,996            177,643          168,212 16  DGC Staffing 17  Undistributed Subtotal 18 19  Total B.        Summary Of 2017 DCE By Period As discussed above, the 2017 DCE periods were designed to reflect the timing and completion of key decommissioning milestones that impact the cost estimate. The table below summarizes the 2017 DCE by period.
22 The estimate to complete amounts in the tables through the report summarize period 2 through 7 costs (i.e.,
22 The estimate to complete amounts in the tables through the report summarize period 2 through 7 costs (i.e.,
2017 - 2051), which include January through September 2017 recorded costs.
2017 - 2051), which include January through September 2017 recorded costs.
13
[A]
                                                        %
[B]
[C = A + B]
[D]
Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)
Estimate To Complete (2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)
1 Distributed Projects 2
Completed Projects 216,611 1,234 217,845 214,024 3
ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 140,047 142,385 282,432 270,210 4
Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 5
Other Projects 19,959 180,789 200,748 189,758 6
Substructure Removal 287,340 287,340 273,042 7
Offshore Conduit Removal 96,039 96,039 91,631 8
ISFSI Demolition 20,229 20,229 19,171 9
Final Site Restoration 7,267 7,267 6,905 10 Distributed Subtotal 11 12 Undistributed Activities 13 Labor-Staffing 336,628 696,304 1,032,932 986,172 14 Non-Labor 241,104 639,572 880,676 848,786 15 Service Level Agreements 10,647 166,996 177,643 168,212 16 DGC Staffing 17 Undistributed Subtotal 18 19 Total
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 3 -  
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 14 TABLE 3 -  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)
Period 1          Period 2        Period 3        Period 4        Period 5        Period 6        Period 7 ISFSI Transition                                                                      Demolition &
TABLE 4 -  
Initial          and Pool        D&D and          D&D and                      Civil Works        Final Site      Total Activities          Storage      Pool Storage    Dry Storage    Dry Storage        Project      Restoration    (Nominal/
Description              (Nominal $)          (2017$)        (2017$)          (2017$)        (2017$)          (2017$)          (2017$)        2017$)
1  Start                                        6/7/2013          1/1/2017        1/1/2019        6/1/2019        1/1/2029        1/1/2046        1/1/2050 2  End                                        12/31/2016        12/31/2018      5/31/2019      12/31/2028      12/31/2045      12/31/2049      12/31/2051 3  Duration (Years)                                36                20              04              96              17 0            40              20 4
5 Distributed Projects 6  Completed Projects                        $    216,611    $      1,234    $            -  $            -  $            - $              - $            - $    217,845 7  ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations                140,047          138,943            3,442                -                -                -              -      282,432 8  Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 9  Other Projects                                  19,959            42,196            7,922          55,867          31,318          43,488                -      200,748 10  Substructure Removal                                    -                -                -                -                -      263,698          23,642        287,340 11  Offshore Conduit Removal                                -                -                -                -                -            670          95,369        96,039 12  ISFSI Demolition                                        -                -                -                -                -                -        20,229        20,229 13  Final Site Restoration                                  -                -                -                -                -                -          7 267        7 267 14 Distributed Subtotal 15 16 Undistributed Activities 17  Labor-Staffing                            $    336,628      $    125,814    $      22,954    $    284,800    $    172,804    $      75,196    $    14,735  $ 1,032,932 18  Non-Labor                                      241,104            84,020          17,913        220,608          218,376          72,388          26,266        880,676 19  Service Level Agreements                        10,647            27,510            4,518          83,094          20,521          22,210            9,143      177,643 20  DGC Staffing 21 Undistributed Subtotal 22 23 Total                                                                                                                                                          $ 4,702,264 TABLE 4 -  


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (2014$ IN THOUSANDS)
OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (2014$ IN THOUSANDS)
Period 1         Period 2         Period 3         Period 4       Period 5         Period 6         Period 7 ISFSI Transition                                                                          Demolition &
Description Period 1 Initial Activities (Nominal $)
Initial        and Pool        D&D and          D&D and                        Civil Works        Final Site Activities         Storage      Pool Storage    Dry Storage      Dry Storage          Project      Restoration        Total Description               (2014 $)           (2014$)         (2014$)         (2014$)         (2014$)         (2014$)           (2014$)       (2014$)
Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2017$)
1 Start                                     6/7/2013         1/1/2017         1/1/2019         6/1/2019       1/1/2029         1/1/2046         1/1/2050 2 End                                     12/31/2016       12/31/2018       5/31/2019       12/31/2028       12/31/2045       12/31/2049       12/31/2051 3 Duration (Years)                             36                20              04              96              17 0             40              20 4
Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2017$)
5 Distributed Projects 6 Completed Projects                     $    213,032     $        992   $            -  $            -  $            -  $            -  $            - $    214,024 7 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations             136,403           130,570           3,237                 -                -                -                -      270,210 8 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 9 Other Projects                                 19,580           39,699           7,455           52,611           29,481           40,932                 -      189,758 10 Substructure Removal                                 -              -                -                -                -        250,603           22,438       273,042 11 Offshore Conduit Removal                             -              -                -                -                -            637           90,994         91,631 12 ISFSI Demolition                                     -              -                -                -                -                -          19,171         19,171 13 Final Site Restoration                               -              -                -                -                -                -            6,905         6,905 14 Distributed Subtotal 15 16 Undistributed Activities 17 Labor-Staffing                         $    332,184     $    118,054   $      21,564   $    267,549   $    162,337   $      70,641     $    13,843   $    986,172 18 Non-Labor                                     239,691           79,724           17,005         210,259         208,221           68,862           25,023       848,786 19 Service Level Agreements                       10,278           26,121           4,288           78,793           19,278           20,865             8,589       168,212 20 DGC Staffing 21 Undistributed Subtotal 22 23 Total                                                                                                                                                           $ 4,478,566 14
Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2017$)
                                                                                  %
Period 5 Dry Storage (2017$)
Period 6 Civil Works Project (2017$)
Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
Final Site Restoration (2017$)
Total (Nominal/
2017$)
1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4
5 Distributed Projects 6
Completed Projects 216,611 1,234 217,845 7
ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 140,047 138,943 3,442 282,432 8
Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 9
Other Projects 19,959 42,196 7,922 55,867 31,318 43,488 200,748 10 Substructure Removal 263,698 23,642 287,340 11 Offshore Conduit Removal 670 95,369 96,039 12 ISFSI Demolition 20,229 20,229 13 Final Site Restoration 7 267 7 267 14 Distributed Subtotal 15 16 Undistributed Activities 17 Labor-Staffing 336,628 125,814 22,954 284,800 172,804 75,196 14,735 1,032,932 18 Non-Labor 241,104 84,020 17,913 220,608 218,376 72,388 26,266 880,676 19 Service Level Agreements 10,647 27,510 4,518 83,094 20,521 22,210 9,143 177,643 20 DGC Staffing 21 Undistributed Subtotal 22 23 Total 4,702,264 Description Period 1 Initial Activities (2014 $)
Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2014$)
Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2014$)
Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2014$)
Period 5 Dry Storage (2014$)
Period 6 Civil Works Project (2014$)
Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
Final Site Restoration (2014$)
Total (2014$)
1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4
5 Distributed Projects 6
Completed Projects 213,032 992 214,024 7
ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 136,403 130,570 3,237 270,210 8
Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 9
Other Projects 19,580 39,699 7,455 52,611 29,481 40,932 189,758 10 Substructure Removal 250,603 22,438 273,042 11 Offshore Conduit Removal 637 90,994 91,631 12 ISFSI Demolition 19,171 19,171 13 Final Site Restoration 6,905 6,905 14 Distributed Subtotal 15 16 Undistributed Activities 17 Labor-Staffing 332,184 118,054 21,564 267,549 162,337 70,641 13,843 986,172 18 Non-Labor 239,691 79,724 17,005 210,259 208,221 68,862 25,023 848,786 19 Service Level Agreements 10,278 26,121 4,288 78,793 19,278 20,865 8,589 168,212 20 DGC Staffing 21 Undistributed Subtotal 22 23 Total 4,478,566
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate V.       Bases Of Estimate And Key Assumptions A.       General Principles Where available, Kenrich relied on executed contracts, actual cost data, and lessons learned from on-site performance to date. The cost estimate of decommissioning activities through the completion of the major decontamination, dismantlement, and waste disposal activities at SONGS in 2028 is based on competitively bid contracts and detailed project cost estimates prepared by SCE project managers. Kenrich worked with SCE personnel to ensure project cost estimates were reasonable and consistent with underlying key assumptions. Kenrich also worked with SCE to determine appropriate contingency factors to ensure that the total estimate remained reasonable and conservative. In addition, Kenrich incorporated project costs that were not included in the 2014 DCE, including those associated with the substantial environmental permitting efforts that are currently in process.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 15 V.
The majority of the cost estimates for activities after 2028, such as the substructures removal and the final site restoration are based on either the 2014 DCE values or updated estimates prepared by High Bridge Associates, experts in cost estimating. 23 Consistent with industry practice, the 2014 DCE used quantity take-offs from plant drawings and Unit Cost Factors.
Bases Of Estimate And Key Assumptions A.
General Principles Where available, Kenrich relied on executed contracts, actual cost data, and lessons learned from on-site performance to date. The cost estimate of decommissioning activities through the completion of the major decontamination, dismantlement, and waste disposal activities at SONGS in 2028 is based on competitively bid contracts and detailed project cost estimates prepared by SCE project managers. Kenrich worked with SCE personnel to ensure project cost estimates were reasonable and consistent with underlying key assumptions. Kenrich also worked with SCE to determine appropriate contingency factors to ensure that the total estimate remained reasonable and conservative. In addition, Kenrich incorporated project costs that were not included in the 2014 DCE, including those associated with the substantial environmental permitting efforts that are currently in process.
The majority of the cost estimates for activities after 2028, such as the substructures removal and the final site restoration are based on either the 2014 DCE values or updated estimates prepared by High Bridge Associates, experts in cost estimating.23 Consistent with industry practice, the 2014 DCE used quantity take-offs from plant drawings and Unit Cost Factors.
Kenrich worked with knowledgeable SCE personnel to prepare cost estimates for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the SONGS facilities, as well as the oversight and support of the decommissioning project. Consistent with the 2014 DCE, these indirect project costs are referred to as undistributed costs in the 2017 DCE. Such undistributed costs include Utility Staffing, Contracted Services, Energy, Site Lease expenses, among other items. Kenrich worked closely with knowledgeable SCE personnel to develop detailed cost estimates that reflect the current known regulatory and project support requirements throughout the entire decommissioning project. Kenrich ensured these cost estimates were supported, reviewed by subject matter experts, and consistent with the project schedule and other key underlying assumptions.
Kenrich worked with knowledgeable SCE personnel to prepare cost estimates for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the SONGS facilities, as well as the oversight and support of the decommissioning project. Consistent with the 2014 DCE, these indirect project costs are referred to as undistributed costs in the 2017 DCE. Such undistributed costs include Utility Staffing, Contracted Services, Energy, Site Lease expenses, among other items. Kenrich worked closely with knowledgeable SCE personnel to develop detailed cost estimates that reflect the current known regulatory and project support requirements throughout the entire decommissioning project. Kenrich ensured these cost estimates were supported, reviewed by subject matter experts, and consistent with the project schedule and other key underlying assumptions.
B.       Key Facts And Assumptions Kenrich worked closely with SCE personnel to identify, define, and support the key assumptions underlying the 2017 DCE. As part of this process, subject matter experts were interviewed and meetings were held with cross-functional teams to review and refine the 23 High Bridge Associates is a project management consulting and services company with experience supporting capital projects, decommissioning and closure projects, new build construction projects, and operating/maintenance programs in various markets. High Bridge has provided consulting and technical subject matter expert services to customers spanning Cost Estimating, Cost/Schedule Reviews, Risk Assessments, Due Diligence Evaluations, Feasibility Studies, Readiness Assessments, Contract Change Management/Claims, and Technical/Management Assessments.
B.
15
Key Facts And Assumptions Kenrich worked closely with SCE personnel to identify, define, and support the key assumptions underlying the 2017 DCE. As part of this process, subject matter experts were interviewed and meetings were held with cross-functional teams to review and refine the 23 High Bridge Associates is a project management consulting and services company with experience supporting capital projects, decommissioning and closure projects, new build construction projects, and operating/maintenance programs in various markets. High Bridge has provided consulting and technical subject matter expert services to customers spanning Cost Estimating, Cost/Schedule Reviews, Risk Assessments, Due Diligence Evaluations, Feasibility Studies, Readiness Assessments, Contract Change Management/Claims, and Technical/Management Assessments.
                                                        %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate assumptions. Additionally, relevant supporting documents were identified and reviewed to confirm accuracy and reasonableness.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 16 assumptions. Additionally, relevant supporting documents were identified and reviewed to confirm accuracy and reasonableness.
The key assumptions and general bases of estimate for the 2017 DCE are summarized below. The detailed bases for the estimated costs for specific distributed and undistributed activities are described in subsequent sections of this report.
The key assumptions and general bases of estimate for the 2017 DCE are summarized below. The detailed bases for the estimated costs for specific distributed and undistributed activities are described in subsequent sections of this report.
General
General
Line 568: Line 923:
Distributed costs are summarized and discussed by major project, and undistributed costs are discussed by cost category.
Distributed costs are summarized and discussed by major project, and undistributed costs are discussed by cost category.
: 2. Recorded costs for decommissioning activities through September 30, 2017 are included in this estimate.
: 2. Recorded costs for decommissioning activities through September 30, 2017 are included in this estimate.
: 3. Approximately $           billion of the SONGS decommissioning project are covered by two contracts (i.e., ISFSI expansion and fuel transfer operations with Holtec and the DGC contract with SDS). Those contract amounts are incorporated into this DCE. 24 Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, and Disposal to Achieve Partial Site Release
: 3. Approximately $
billion of the SONGS decommissioning project are covered by two contracts (i.e., ISFSI expansion and fuel transfer operations with Holtec and the DGC contract with SDS). Those contract amounts are incorporated into this DCE.24 Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, and Disposal to Achieve Partial Site Release
: 4. The DGC contract with SDS was executed in December 2016. SDS mobilized to the SONGS site and commenced Phase I work (transition and planning) on January 9, 2017.
: 4. The DGC contract with SDS was executed in December 2016. SDS mobilized to the SONGS site and commenced Phase I work (transition and planning) on January 9, 2017.
: 5. The pricing of the SDS contract generally covers two phases of work: transition and planning (Phase I) and the decontamination, dismantlement, and removal of all man-made improvements to 3 feet below grade (and or deeper as required) to reduce the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only (Phase II). In addition, SDS is expected to install backfill and perform other work as requested.
: 5. The pricing of the SDS contract generally covers two phases of work: transition and planning (Phase I) and the decontamination, dismantlement, and removal of all man-made improvements to 3 feet below grade (and or deeper as required) to reduce the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only (Phase II). In addition, SDS is expected to install backfill and perform other work as requested.
: 6. The CEQA review process completed by the CSLC will conclude with the issuance of an Environmental Impact Report that will be utilized by the CCC in connection with its issuance of a CDP in the last quarter of 2018. The CDP will allow physical decommissioning work to commence at SONGS. Accordingly, SDS is expected to begin Phase II work in January 2019.
: 6. The CEQA review process completed by the CSLC will conclude with the issuance of an Environmental Impact Report that will be utilized by the CCC in connection with its issuance of a CDP in the last quarter of 2018. The CDP will allow physical decommissioning work to commence at SONGS. Accordingly, SDS is expected to begin Phase II work in January 2019.
: 7. SDSs Phase II work is estimated to be completed by December 2028, following the submission of Final Site Survey to the NRC and the approval of a partial site release, reducing the SONGS 2&3 NRC Part 50 license footprint to the ISFSI area only. 25 24 Contract milestone payments are aligned with SCEs current expected project schedule.
: 7. SDSs Phase II work is estimated to be completed by December 2028, following the submission of Final Site Survey to the NRC and the approval of a partial site release, reducing the SONGS 2&3 NRC Part 50 license footprint to the ISFSI area only.25 24 Contract milestone payments are aligned with SCEs current expected project schedule.
25 SDSs Phase II work also covers non-radiological hazardous waste disposal, e.g., asbestos, chromates, lead paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
25 SDSs Phase II work also covers non-radiological hazardous waste disposal, e.g., asbestos, chromates, lead paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).
16
%
                                                      %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 17
: 8. Following the D&D work, the SONGS plant site will be backfilled to current grade levels.
: 8. Following the D&D work, the SONGS plant site will be backfilled to current grade levels.
Clean material available on the SONGS plant site may be acceptable for purposes of backfill and additional required backfill material will be imported from offsite. 26
Clean material available on the SONGS plant site may be acceptable for purposes of backfill and additional required backfill material will be imported from offsite.26
: 9. The 2017 DCE includes costs to purchase and import backfill material from offsite.
: 9. The 2017 DCE includes costs to purchase and import backfill material from offsite.
Spent Nuclear Fuel and GTCC Waste
Spent Nuclear Fuel and GTCC Waste
Line 590: Line 945:
: 15. GTCC disposal costs are conservatively estimated to account for potential DOE charges for acceptance of GTCC waste (i.e., in addition to the one-mill fee charged per kilowatt of generation per the Standard Contract with the DOE).
: 15. GTCC disposal costs are conservatively estimated to account for potential DOE charges for acceptance of GTCC waste (i.e., in addition to the one-mill fee charged per kilowatt of generation per the Standard Contract with the DOE).
Substructure Removal Below 3 Feet Below Grade (i.e., Below 27 Feet Elevation)
Substructure Removal Below 3 Feet Below Grade (i.e., Below 27 Feet Elevation)
: 16. SCE anticipates submitting an application to the Navy to amend the then current real estate authorization to seek a Navy determination of the substructure removal requirements. The Navy is expected to establish those requirements after completing a NEPA process and to include the requirements within a new or amended real estate authorization. This will define the final site release criteria for turnover of the SONGS property back to the Navy. The 26 Paragraph 12 of the Grant of Easement, U.S. Department of Navy to Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, dated May 12, 1964 states, That upon termination of the easement granted herein, the Grantees at their expense may remove, and if desired by the government, shall remove any and all improvements installed or constructed hereunder and shall restore the Premises to a condition satisfactory to the Director, Southwest Division, Bureau of Yards and Docks, except that the Grantees shall not be obligated to restore any natural material cut or filled in the necessary excavation and grading of the Premises and such surrounding area within the Reservation as may have been contaminated by the operation of the Nuclear Station. Thus, the contract states that the Navy will specify the final site restoration requirements. The Navy has not yet specified its decontamination, backfill, compaction, grading, or re-vegetation requirements. The Navy is expected to establish these requirements as a part of the NEPA process and specify them within a new real estate authorization.
: 16. SCE anticipates submitting an application to the Navy to amend the then current real estate authorization to seek a Navy determination of the substructure removal requirements. The Navy is expected to establish those requirements after completing a NEPA process and to include the requirements within a new or amended real estate authorization. This will define the final site release criteria for turnover of the SONGS property back to the Navy. The 26 Paragraph 12 of the Grant of Easement, U.S. Department of Navy to Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, dated May 12, 1964 states, That upon termination of the easement granted herein, the Grantees at their expense may remove, and if desired by the government, shall remove any and all improvements installed or constructed hereunder and shall restore the Premises to a condition satisfactory to the Director, Southwest Division, Bureau of Yards and Docks, except that the Grantees shall not be obligated to restore any natural material cut or filled in the necessary excavation and grading of the Premises and such surrounding area within the Reservation as may have been contaminated by the operation of the Nuclear Station. Thus, the contract states that the Navy will specify the final site restoration requirements. The Navy has not yet specified its decontamination, backfill, compaction, grading, or re-vegetation requirements. The Navy is expected to establish these requirements as a part of the NEPA process and specify them within a new real estate authorization.  
17
%
                                                            %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate application is currently expected to be filed in 2040, with a Navy decision by 2045. That timing may change depending upon the time frame for the DOE removal of the spent fuel.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 18 application is currently expected to be filed in 2040, with a Navy decision by 2045. That timing may change depending upon the time frame for the DOE removal of the spent fuel.
: 17. The removal of substructures (i.e., man-made improvements remaining after the D&D work and reduction of the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only) is expected to begin in 2046 and be completed by December 2049. The final site restoration criteria will not be known until the Navy amends the SONGS site real estate authorization to include such criteria.
: 17. The removal of substructures (i.e., man-made improvements remaining after the D&D work and reduction of the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only) is expected to begin in 2046 and be completed by December 2049. The final site restoration criteria will not be known until the Navy amends the SONGS site real estate authorization to include such criteria.
Therefore, for purposes of the 2017 DCE, it is assumed that all SONGS 2&3 substructures will be removed during 2046-2049 (Period 6) (excluding the ISFSI which will be removed in a subsequent period). 27
Therefore, for purposes of the 2017 DCE, it is assumed that all SONGS 2&3 substructures will be removed during 2046-2049 (Period 6) (excluding the ISFSI which will be removed in a subsequent period).27
: 18. The estimated costs for the substructure removal work scope included in the 2014 DCE were reviewed and updated by High Bridge Associates. High Bridge Associates validated the quantities contained in the 2014 DCE and reduced the costs for non-radioactive waste disposal (based on La Paz, Arizona disposal rates, as compared to Oregon state rates which were assumed for purposes of the 2014 DCE). 28
: 18. The estimated costs for the substructure removal work scope included in the 2014 DCE were reviewed and updated by High Bridge Associates. High Bridge Associates validated the quantities contained in the 2014 DCE and reduced the costs for non-radioactive waste disposal (based on La Paz, Arizona disposal rates, as compared to Oregon state rates which were assumed for purposes of the 2014 DCE).28
: 19. All concrete and other demolition debris (including clean; i.e., non-radioactive, non-hazardous material) that is deemed by the Navy or SCE to be not suitable for purposes of backfill will be transported to and disposed at an out-of-state Class III landfill at La Paz, Arizona or other facilities as may be required. 29 Cost for transporting clean scrap metal to a recycler is included in the DCE. No credit is taken for any salvage value of the scrap metal.
: 19. All concrete and other demolition debris (including clean; i.e., non-radioactive, non-hazardous material) that is deemed by the Navy or SCE to be not suitable for purposes of backfill will be transported to and disposed at an out-of-state Class III landfill at La Paz, Arizona or other facilities as may be required.29 Cost for transporting clean scrap metal to a recycler is included in the DCE. No credit is taken for any salvage value of the scrap metal.
Conduits, ISFSI Demolition, and Final Site Restoration
Conduits, ISFSI Demolition, and Final Site Restoration
: 20. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, it is assumed the offshore intake and outfall conduit will be removed during Period 7, ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration, and will be complete by 2050.
: 20. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, it is assumed the offshore intake and outfall conduit will be removed during Period 7, ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration, and will be complete by 2050.
27 Any determination in the 2017 DCE that accounts for only partial removal of substructures would be non-conservative, arbitrary and inconsistent with the U.S. Navy easement, and without basis. If the final site restoration requirements specified in the future by the Navy allow less than complete removal of non-contaminated structures below 3 feet below grade (i.e., 27 feet elevation), then that new assumption will be incorporated into the subsequent DCE update.
27 Any determination in the 2017 DCE that accounts for only partial removal of substructures would be non-conservative, arbitrary and inconsistent with the U.S. Navy easement, and without basis. If the final site restoration requirements specified in the future by the Navy allow less than complete removal of non-contaminated structures below 3 feet below grade (i.e., 27 feet elevation), then that new assumption will be incorporated into the subsequent DCE update.
29 This out-of-state disposal requirement is consistent with the Governor of the State of California Executive Order D-62-02.
29 This out-of-state disposal requirement is consistent with the Governor of the State of California Executive Order D-62-02.
18
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 19
: 21. Following the complete removal of SONGS spent fuel and GTCC waste in 2049, the ISFSI and related facilities, and all remaining man-made structures (e.g., gunite walls, roads and parking lots, rail facilities) will be demolished and removed.
: 21. Following the complete removal of SONGS spent fuel and GTCC waste in 2049, the ISFSI and related facilities, and all remaining man-made structures (e.g., gunite walls, roads and parking lots, rail facilities) will be demolished and removed.
: 22. The SONGS site will be re-established to meet Navy site restoration requirements, including grading and re-vegetated.
: 22. The SONGS site will be re-established to meet Navy site restoration requirements, including grading and re-vegetated.
Other
Other
: 23. SCE expects to return the Mesa site to the Navy by July 31, 2021. The April 2011 lease from the Navy is known as the Mesa lease and contains five parcels. Parcels 5, 6, and 7 are associated with the Mesa site and are being returned. Parcels 8 & 9 are adjacent to the SONGS site and will be retained and incorporated into a new site lease during the real estate authorization process.
: 23. SCE expects to return the Mesa site to the Navy by July 31, 2021. The April 2011 lease from the Navy is known as the Mesa lease and contains five parcels. Parcels 5, 6, and 7 are associated with the Mesa site and are being returned. Parcels 8 & 9 are adjacent to the SONGS site and will be retained and incorporated into a new site lease during the real estate authorization process.
C.       Project Schedule The 2017 DCE assumes the timing for completing major activities is generally the same as the 2014 DCE, with the exception of the timing for removing the substructures below 3 feet below grade, which moved from 2031 to 2049. The schedule assumed in the 2017 DCE is as follows:
C.
x   June 1, 2019 - Fuel Transfer Operations Complete.
Project Schedule The 2017 DCE assumes the timing for completing major activities is generally the same as the 2014 DCE, with the exception of the timing for removing the substructures below 3 feet below grade, which moved from 2031 to 2049. The schedule assumed in the 2017 DCE is as follows:
x   December 2028 - Completion of the D&D work and receipt of NRC approval of the amendment to achieve partial site release and reduce the Part 50 License to the ISFSI area only.
x June 1, 2019 - Fuel Transfer Operations Complete.
x   December 2049 - Completion of Substructures removal below 3 feet below grade (i.e., 27 feet elevation).
x December 2028 - Completion of the D&D work and receipt of NRC approval of the amendment to achieve partial site release and reduce the Part 50 License to the ISFSI area only.
x   December 2049 - All spent fuel removed from the site.
x December 2049 - Completion of Substructures removal below 3 feet below grade (i.e., 27 feet elevation).
x   December 2051 - Completion of ISFSI Demolition, Conduits Removal, Final Site Restoration, and Lease Termination.
x December 2049 - All spent fuel removed from the site.
D.       Distributed Costs
x December 2051 - Completion of ISFSI Demolition, Conduits Removal, Final Site Restoration, and Lease Termination.
: 1.     Completed Projects Following the transition to decommissioning in June 2013, SCE began efforts to prepare the site for decommissioning and obtain necessary approvals of NRC license amendments.
D.
During the period from June 7, 2013 to September 30, 2017, SCE began and completed projects 19
Distributed Costs 1.
                                                  %
Completed Projects Following the transition to decommissioning in June 2013, SCE began efforts to prepare the site for decommissioning and obtain necessary approvals of NRC license amendments.
During the period from June 7, 2013 to September 30, 2017, SCE began and completed projects  
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate to implement Cold & Dark, 30 perform the initial site assessment, dispose of legacy radwaste, prepare and receive approval for regulatory submittals, and select a DGC.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 20 to implement Cold & Dark,30 perform the initial site assessment, dispose of legacy radwaste, prepare and receive approval for regulatory submittals, and select a DGC.
During this period, SCE also implemented projects that were needed to comply with regulatory requirements and other obligations. SCE began and completed projects related to Security Shutdown Strategy, Large Organism Exclusion Device Modifications, Fuel Cancellation payments, and other efforts.
During this period, SCE also implemented projects that were needed to comply with regulatory requirements and other obligations. SCE began and completed projects related to Security Shutdown Strategy, Large Organism Exclusion Device Modifications, Fuel Cancellation payments, and other efforts.
Kenrich incorporated the recorded costs for the completed projects into the 2017 DCE.
Kenrich incorporated the recorded costs for the completed projects into the 2017 DCE.
SCE will support the reasonableness of costs incurred in separate filings in the 2015 and 2018 NDCTP.
SCE will support the reasonableness of costs incurred in separate filings in the 2015 and 2018 NDCTP.
: 2.       ISFSI And Fuel Transfer Operations Following a competitive bidding process, SCE awarded a contract to Holtec to license, design, and construct an expanded on-site ISFSI; and to supply, load, and transfer the multi-purpose canisters containing fuel assemblies, from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the expanded ISFSI. Holtecs work scope generally includes:
2.
x   Perform engineering, procurement, and construction services for a new on-site ISFSI pad and supporting facilities (e.g., security building, haul path).
ISFSI And Fuel Transfer Operations Following a competitive bidding process, SCE awarded a contract to Holtec to license, design, and construct an expanded on-site ISFSI; and to supply, load, and transfer the multi-purpose canisters containing fuel assemblies, from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the expanded ISFSI. Holtecs work scope generally includes:
x   Perform fuel inspections and spent fuel pool waste characterizations.
x Perform engineering, procurement, and construction services for a new on-site ISFSI pad and supporting facilities (e.g., security building, haul path).
x   Provide spent fuel canisters and vertical ventilated underground dry storage modules to store SONGS spent fuel assemblies.
x Perform fuel inspections and spent fuel pool waste characterizations.
x   Load and transport the canisters to the ISFSI and place the canisters into the dry storage modules.
x Provide spent fuel canisters and vertical ventilated underground dry storage modules to store SONGS spent fuel assemblies.
x   Transport the loaded GTCC waste (reactor internals and certain other non-fuel waste material) canisters to the ISFSI. 31 x   Engineering analyses, documentation, licensing and permitting activities.
x Load and transport the canisters to the ISFSI and place the canisters into the dry storage modules.
x Transport the loaded GTCC waste (reactor internals and certain other non-fuel waste material) canisters to the ISFSI.31 x
Engineering analyses, documentation, licensing and permitting activities.
SCE also maintains an ISFSI oversight team to ensure safe and efficient execution of the work by Holtec. The estimate for ISFSI and Fuel Transfer Operations also includes these SCE project oversight costs.
SCE also maintains an ISFSI oversight team to ensure safe and efficient execution of the work by Holtec. The estimate for ISFSI and Fuel Transfer Operations also includes these SCE project oversight costs.
30 Includes plant modifications to systems that are not required to support spent fuel pool cooling or to meet other license conditions and places SONGS in a Cold and Dark condition in preparation of dismantlement and decontamination.
30 Includes plant modifications to systems that are not required to support spent fuel pool cooling or to meet other license conditions and places SONGS in a Cold and Dark condition in preparation of dismantlement and decontamination.
31 The Holtec contract milestone payment for transferring the GTCC waste to the ISFSI, as well as costs associated with the procurement of GTCC canisters is included in a separate line item in the DCE for GTCC Waste Storage within Other Projects.
31 The Holtec contract milestone payment for transferring the GTCC waste to the ISFSI, as well as costs associated with the procurement of GTCC canisters is included in a separate line item in the DCE for GTCC Waste Storage within Other Projects.  
20
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 5 ISFSI & FUEL TRANSFER OPERATIONS ESTIMATE
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 21 TABLE 5 ISFSI & FUEL TRANSFER OPERATIONS ESTIMATE
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN THOUSANDS) 3.
Recorded      Estimate To      Total Estimate    Total Estimate Through 2016      Complete      At Completion      At Completion Description                (Nominal $)      (2017$)      (Nominal /2017$)        (2014$)
Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, And Disposal In December 2016, following a competitive bidding process, SCE executed a contract with SDS to perform the major decontamination, dismantlement, demolition, and disposal work at SONGS. The SDS work will include removing all SONGS 2&3 structures, systems, and components to 3 feet below grade (i.e., to 27 feet elevation) to permit the release of the property for unrestricted future use.32 The SDS work will include characterizing, packaging, transporting, and disposing of waste from the SONGS site to appropriately licensed or permitted facilities.33 Additionally, SDS will support SCE to modify or amend its NRC Part 50 license for SONGS 2&3, as well as its existing agreements with the U.S. Navy and other permitting agencies as required for completion of this work scope.
1 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 2  ISFSI Expansion                          $      60,485  $      74,100    $      134,585  $        128,026 3   Canister Fabrication                            79,562          27,705            107,266            104,026 4  Spent Fuel Loading & Transfer to ISFSI                -        40,580            40,580            38,159 5  ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Total  $      140,047  $      142,385    $      282,432  $        270,210
: 3.      Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, And Disposal In December 2016, following a competitive bidding process, SCE executed a contract with SDS to perform the major decontamination, dismantlement, demolition, and disposal work at SONGS. The SDS work will include removing all SONGS 2&3 structures, systems, and components to 3 feet below grade (i.e., to 27 feet elevation) to permit the release of the property for unrestricted future use. 32 The SDS work will include characterizing, packaging, transporting, and disposing of waste from the SONGS site to appropriately licensed or permitted facilities. 33 Additionally, SDS will support SCE to modify or amend its NRC Part 50 license for SONGS 2&3, as well as its existing agreements with the U.S. Navy and other permitting agencies as required for completion of this work scope.
The work is divided into two phases:
The work is divided into two phases:
Phase I:           Transition and mobilization Phase II:         Decontamination, dismantlement, demolition, and waste disposal activities necessary to achieve partial site release and reduce the SONGS Part 50 license footprint to the ISFSI area only.
Phase I:
Transition and mobilization Phase II:
Decontamination, dismantlement, demolition, and waste disposal activities necessary to achieve partial site release and reduce the SONGS Part 50 license footprint to the ISFSI area only.
SDS will provide project management and field oversight, as well as planning and execution of D&D-related site management and support functions during the decommissioning of SONGS. SCE will perform oversight of SDSs activities, as required by the applicable licenses and permits, and will retain responsibility for license-related operations and security (i.e., spent fuel pool, fuel transfer, and ISFSI operations).
SDS will provide project management and field oversight, as well as planning and execution of D&D-related site management and support functions during the decommissioning of SONGS. SCE will perform oversight of SDSs activities, as required by the applicable licenses and permits, and will retain responsibility for license-related operations and security (i.e., spent fuel pool, fuel transfer, and ISFSI operations).
32 SDSs work scope excludes the ISFSI and switchyard facilities.
32 SDSs work scope excludes the ISFSI and switchyard facilities.
33 GTCC waste and spent fuel will be stored on the ISFSI and are not expected to be transported to a disposal facility during SDSs performance of the work.
33 GTCC waste and spent fuel will be stored on the ISFSI and are not expected to be transported to a disposal facility during SDSs performance of the work.
21
Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)
                                                        %
Estimate To Complete (2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)
1 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 2
ISFSI Expansion 60,485 74,100 134,585 128,026 3
Canister Fabrication 79,562 27,705 107,266 104,026 4
Spent Fuel Loading & Transfer to ISFSI 40,580 40,580 38,159 5
ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Total 140,047 142,385 282,432 270,210
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Phase II D&D activities will include:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 22 Phase II D&D activities will include:
x   Segmenting the SONGS 2&3 reactor vessels and internals, and loading them into storage containers.
x Segmenting the SONGS 2&3 reactor vessels and internals, and loading them into storage containers.
x   Removing and disposing of large components including SONGS 2&3 reactor pressure vessels, steam generators, pressurizers, and turbine-generators.
x Removing and disposing of large components including SONGS 2&3 reactor pressure vessels, steam generators, pressurizers, and turbine-generators.
x   Decontaminating and removing all structures, systems, and components as necessary to achieve partial site release and reduce the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only.
x Decontaminating and removing all structures, systems, and components as necessary to achieve partial site release and reduce the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only.
x   Removing certain above-seabed components of the ocean conduits.
x Removing certain above-seabed components of the ocean conduits.
x   Necessary backfill work to achieve level grade for the power block area at an elevation of +30.0 feet. 34 x   Development of the partial site release plan in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 20.1402 site release criteria. SDS will perform necessary D&D work to meet a radiological release criteria that does not exceed 15 millirem per year. 35 The work scope under DGC contract does not include removing the intake/discharge structure beneath the seawall; ocean conduits; seawall and pedestrian walkway; gunite slope protection; and certain railroad track and site access roads.
x Necessary backfill work to achieve level grade for the power block area at an elevation of +30.0 feet.34 x
Support for SCE-Retained Responsibilities SCE will remain the licensed operator for NRC licenses associated with SONGS and will retain responsibility for interfacing and corresponding with the regulatory agencies in the management of licenses. 36 SCE will also continue to be the primary interface with the Navy (property owner), and the regulatory agencies and other government authorities responsible for existing permits and the issuance of new permits necessary to perform decommissioning. SDS will support SCE interface with the regulatory agencies and the Navy. 37 34 Backfill material is excluded from the fixed price portion of SDSs contract scope.
Development of the partial site release plan in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 20.1402 site release criteria. SDS will perform necessary D&D work to meet a radiological release criteria that does not exceed 15 millirem per year.35 The work scope under DGC contract does not include removing the intake/discharge structure beneath the seawall; ocean conduits; seawall and pedestrian walkway; gunite slope protection; and certain railroad track and site access roads.
Support for SCE-Retained Responsibilities SCE will remain the licensed operator for NRC licenses associated with SONGS and will retain responsibility for interfacing and corresponding with the regulatory agencies in the management of licenses.36 SCE will also continue to be the primary interface with the Navy (property owner), and the regulatory agencies and other government authorities responsible for existing permits and the issuance of new permits necessary to perform decommissioning. SDS will support SCE interface with the regulatory agencies and the Navy.37 34 Backfill material is excluded from the fixed price portion of SDSs contract scope.
35 Per 10 C.F.R § 20.1402, the NRC site release criteria is 25 mrem per year calculated as the peak annual Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) dose expected within the first 1,000 years after decommissioning. Release criteria is defined as residual radioactivity that is distinguishable from background radiation which results in a TEDE to an average member of the critical group, including that from groundwater sources of drinking water, and has been reduced to levels that are as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
35 Per 10 C.F.R § 20.1402, the NRC site release criteria is 25 mrem per year calculated as the peak annual Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) dose expected within the first 1,000 years after decommissioning. Release criteria is defined as residual radioactivity that is distinguishable from background radiation which results in a TEDE to an average member of the critical group, including that from groundwater sources of drinking water, and has been reduced to levels that are as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).
36 Nuclear operations are defined as operations and administration of installed, in-service structures, systems, and components within the Protected Area (PA).
36 Nuclear operations are defined as operations and administration of installed, in-service structures, systems, and components within the Protected Area (PA).
37 SCE will retain responsibility for personnel screening for access and badging to the SONGS protected areas (PAs) and vital areas (VAs) until all spent fuel is removed from the spent fuel pools and placed into storage on the ISFSI and the associated security plans are revised and approved. When the PAs/VAs are reduced to the ISFSI only, SCE will transition this responsibility to SDS for all areas except the ISFSI. SCE will retain responsibility for the 22
37 SCE will retain responsibility for personnel screening for access and badging to the SONGS protected areas (PAs) and vital areas (VAs) until all spent fuel is removed from the spent fuel pools and placed into storage on the ISFSI and the associated security plans are revised and approved. When the PAs/VAs are reduced to the ISFSI only, SCE will transition this responsibility to SDS for all areas except the ISFSI. SCE will retain responsibility for the  
                                                            %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 23 4.
: 4.     Substructure Removal The substructure removal work will include the activities necessary to achieve the final end state requirements determined by the Navy (which are incremental to the NRC partial site release requirements that will be met during SDSs major D&D work). SCE currently plans to select a contractor to perform the substructure removal work in the mid-2040s.
Substructure Removal The substructure removal work will include the activities necessary to achieve the final end state requirements determined by the Navy (which are incremental to the NRC partial site release requirements that will be met during SDSs major D&D work). SCE currently plans to select a contractor to perform the substructure removal work in the mid-2040s.
For purposes of preparing the 2017 DCE, Kenrich retained High Bridge Associates to review and update the 2014 DCE estimate for the removal of substructures below 3 feet below grade.
For purposes of preparing the 2017 DCE, Kenrich retained High Bridge Associates to review and update the 2014 DCE estimate for the removal of substructures below 3 feet below grade.
More specifically, substructure removal activities will include the following:
More specifically, substructure removal activities will include the following:
x     Removing substructure systems and components required to achieve end state requirements set forth in the applicable Navy real estate authorization for the SONGS Site. This work will include cleanup, remediation, and/or removal of structures, systems, and components, soils/debris, and/or contaminated groundwater, as required. 38 x     Backfilling excavations and voids with approved material and leveling the SONGS site, as required by regulatory and landowner closure requirements.
x Removing substructure systems and components required to achieve end state requirements set forth in the applicable Navy real estate authorization for the SONGS Site. This work will include cleanup, remediation, and/or removal of structures, systems, and components, soils/debris, and/or contaminated groundwater, as required.38 x
x     Characterizing, packaging, transporting, processing, and disposing of SONGS waste as required to support the regulatory and landowner closure requirements.
Backfilling excavations and voids with approved material and leveling the SONGS site, as required by regulatory and landowner closure requirements.
x     Removing the existing seawall and intake and outfall box culvert.
x Characterizing, packaging, transporting, processing, and disposing of SONGS waste as required to support the regulatory and landowner closure requirements.
x Removing the existing seawall and intake and outfall box culvert.
Excluded from the substructure removal work are the demolition and removal of the ISFSI after the spent nuclear fuel and GTCC waste is removed by the DOE. Also excluded is the other final site restoration work to meet requirements related to the final termination of the SONGS site easements (e.g., ocean conduits, gunite slopes, drainage requirements, access roads, etc.).
Excluded from the substructure removal work are the demolition and removal of the ISFSI after the spent nuclear fuel and GTCC waste is removed by the DOE. Also excluded is the other final site restoration work to meet requirements related to the final termination of the SONGS site easements (e.g., ocean conduits, gunite slopes, drainage requirements, access roads, etc.).
The estimated substructure removal costs are summarized in the table below.
The estimated substructure removal costs are summarized in the table below.
industrial and commercial security requirements at SONGS until the security plans are revised and the NRC approves the reduction of the PA/VAs to the area associated with the on-site ISFSI. SDS will take over this responsibility following the transfer of all spent fuel and GTCC to the ISFSI and the implementation of the associated revised security plans.
industrial and commercial security requirements at SONGS until the security plans are revised and the NRC approves the reduction of the PA/VAs to the area associated with the on-site ISFSI. SDS will take over this responsibility following the transfer of all spent fuel and GTCC to the ISFSI and the implementation of the associated revised security plans.
38 The activities may also include removal of certain above grade facilities remaining after the major D&D work performed by SDS, potentially including non-essential utilities, parking areas, roads, and other improvements.
38 The activities may also include removal of certain above grade facilities remaining after the major D&D work performed by SDS, potentially including non-essential utilities, parking areas, roads, and other improvements.
23
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 6 SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ESTIMATE
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 24 TABLE 6 SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ESTIMATE
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN THOUSANDS) 5.
Recorded        Estimate To    Total Estimate  Total Estimate Through 2016      Complete      At Completion    At Completion Description              (Nominal $)        (2017$)    (Nominal /2017$)      (2014$)
Offshore Conduit Removal As was the case for the 2014 DCE, uncertainty remains regarding the requirements for removal of the offshore intake and outfall conduits located below the sea floor. For SONGS 1, the CSLC has allowed the SONGS 1 conduits to remain in place provided that the SONGS 1 Participants retain the liability to remove the SONGS 1 conduits should that be deemed by the CSLC to be necessary at a future date. For these reasons, the 2017 DCE continues to include an estimated cost to perform the full removal of the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits as was estimated in the 2014 DCE. The 2017 DCE includes $96.0 million to fully remove the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits.
1 Substructure Removal 2    Excavation and Dewatering            $            -  $      152,819  $      152,819  $      145,563 3    Demolition and Backfill                            -        108,277          108,277          102,573 4    Other                                              -            8,833            8,833            8,386 5   Removal of Seawall and Box Culvert                -          17,410            17,410          16,520 6    Substructure Removal                $            -  $      287,340  $      287,340  $      273,042
6.
: 5.      Offshore Conduit Removal As was the case for the 2014 DCE, uncertainty remains regarding the requirements for removal of the offshore intake and outfall conduits located below the sea floor. For SONGS 1, the CSLC has allowed the SONGS 1 conduits to remain in place provided that the SONGS 1 Participants retain the liability to remove the SONGS 1 conduits should that be deemed by the CSLC to be necessary at a future date. For these reasons, the 2017 DCE continues to include an estimated cost to perform the full removal of the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits as was estimated in the 2014 DCE. The 2017 DCE includes $96.0 million to fully remove the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits.
ISFSI Demolition Following the removal of all spent fuel and GTCC waste by the DOE, SCE will demolish and remove the ISFSI and perform activities necessary for the final restoration of the SONGS site. At the time the 2014 DCE was prepared, the specific plans to expand the ISFSI had not been defined. Later in 2014, SCE entered into a contract with Holtec to expand the ISFSI.
: 6.       ISFSI Demolition Following the removal of all spent fuel and GTCC waste by the DOE, SCE will demolish and remove the ISFSI and perform activities necessary for the final restoration of the SONGS site. At the time the 2014 DCE was prepared, the specific plans to expand the ISFSI had not been defined. Later in 2014, SCE entered into a contract with Holtec to expand the ISFSI.
Kenrich retained High Bridge Associates to update the ISFSI demolition estimate in the 2014 DCE to reflect the Holtec ISFSI pad. The updated estimate for ISFSI demolition is $20.2 million.
Kenrich retained High Bridge Associates to update the ISFSI demolition estimate in the 2014 DCE to reflect the Holtec ISFSI pad. The updated estimate for ISFSI demolition is $20.2 million.
: 7.       Final Site Restoration The final restoration work includes the removal of the gunite slope protection; remaining railroad tracks, rails, and ballast; access roads and parking lots. In addition, this work includes any other work required by the Navy real estate authorization, which is expected to include the final grading and re-vegetation of the SONGS site. The total estimated final site restoration work in the 2017 DCE is $7.3 million. The 2014 DCE included, as part of final site restoration, the costs to remove the intake and outfall structure underneath the seawall, which required installing and removing dewatering equipment and a temporary seawall. The intake and outfall structure beneath the seawall, as well as the seawall itself, are now expected to be removed 24
7.
                                                      %
Final Site Restoration The final restoration work includes the removal of the gunite slope protection; remaining railroad tracks, rails, and ballast; access roads and parking lots. In addition, this work includes any other work required by the Navy real estate authorization, which is expected to include the final grading and re-vegetation of the SONGS site. The total estimated final site restoration work in the 2017 DCE is $7.3 million. The 2014 DCE included, as part of final site restoration, the costs to remove the intake and outfall structure underneath the seawall, which required installing and removing dewatering equipment and a temporary seawall. The intake and outfall structure beneath the seawall, as well as the seawall itself, are now expected to be removed Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)
Estimate To Complete (2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)
1 Substructure Removal 2
Excavation and Dewatering 152,819 152,819 145,563 3
Demolition and Backfill 108,277 108,277 102,573 4
Other 8,833 8,833 8,386 5
Removal of Seawall and Box Culvert 17,410 17,410 16,520 6
Substructure Removal 287,340 287,340 273,042
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate during the civil works project (i.e., Period 6, 2046-2049). Therefore, the second dewatering process and temporary seawall are no longer necessary during final site restoration.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 25 during the civil works project (i.e., Period 6, 2046-2049). Therefore, the second dewatering process and temporary seawall are no longer necessary during final site restoration.
: 8.         Other Distributed Projects In addition to the major decommissioning projects discussed above, SCE must also perform other projects to comply with federal and state regulations and the terms of SCEs real estate authorizations with the Navy. These other projects and their associated estimated costs are shown in Table 7 and discussed in more detail below.
8.
Other Distributed Projects In addition to the major decommissioning projects discussed above, SCE must also perform other projects to comply with federal and state regulations and the terms of SCEs real estate authorizations with the Navy. These other projects and their associated estimated costs are shown in Table 7 and discussed in more detail below.
TABLE 7 OTHER DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS ESTIMATE
TABLE 7 OTHER DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS ESTIMATE
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN THOUSANDS) a.
Recorded       Estimate To    Total Estimate  Total Estimate Through 2016       Complete    At Completion    At Completion Description                            (Nominal $)       (2017$)   (Nominal /2017$)     (2014$)
ISFSI Aging Management The Aging Management project was established to develop inspection and maintenance programs for the Areva and Holtec spent fuel dry storage systems. Also included are initial cask testing, inspection equipment and licensing costs for dry cask NRC Certificate of Compliance (CoC) renewals, and Safety Analysis Report (SAR) updates. Ongoing required annual maintenance and inspections of the spent fuel dry storage systems are included in the undistributed non-labor Aging Management category.
1 Other Projects 2 ISFSI Aging Management                                       $          385 $      38,376 $        38,761 $      36,489 3 Coastal Development Permit Extensions                                     -          5,580             5,580           5,252 4 GTCC Waste Storage                                                         -        28,270           28,270         26,632 5 Mesa Site Turnover                                                   7,245         13,967           21,212         20,341 6 CEQA Permitting                                                       3,169           5,162             8,331           7,914 7 Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal And Plant Easements           646         14,658           15,305         14,427 8 Plant Lease Extension                                                     -          4,118             4,118           3,878 9 Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration                           -          9,290             9,290           8,745 10 Cyber Security Modifications                                         8,513           1,131             9,644           9,380 11 DCE Update                                                                 -          3,897             3,897           3,669 12 GTCC Disposal                                                             -        43,200           43,200         40,662 13 ISFSI CDP Settlement                                                       -          4,543             4,543           4,277 14 Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement                               -          7,447             7,447           7,011 15 NIA Sump Modifications                                                     -          1,150             1,150           1,081 16 Other Projects Total                                         $      19,959 $      180,789 $      200,748 $      189,758
: b. Coastal Development Permit Extensions SCE holds a Coastal Development Permit for the storage of SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Areva ISFSI system until November 2022, and a separate CDP to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Holtec ISFSI system until 2035. Therefore, SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)
: a. ISFSI Aging Management The Aging Management project was established to develop inspection and maintenance programs for the Areva and Holtec spent fuel dry storage systems. Also included are initial cask testing, inspection equipment and licensing costs for dry cask NRC Certificate of Compliance (CoC) renewals, and Safety Analysis Report (SAR) updates. Ongoing required annual maintenance and inspections of the spent fuel dry storage systems are included in the undistributed non-labor Aging Management category.
Estimate To Complete (2017$)
: b. Coastal Development Permit Extensions SCE holds a Coastal Development Permit for the storage of SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Areva ISFSI system until November 2022, and a separate CDP to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Holtec ISFSI system until 2035. Therefore, SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions 25
Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)
                                                                    %
Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)
1 Other Projects 2
ISFSI Aging Management 385 38,376 38,761 36,489 3
Coastal Development Permit Extensions 5,580 5,580 5,252 4
GTCC Waste Storage 28,270 28,270 26,632 5
Mesa Site Turnover 7,245 13,967 21,212 20,341 6
CEQA Permitting 3,169 5,162 8,331 7,914 7
Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal And Plant Easements 646 14,658 15,305 14,427 8
Plant Lease Extension 4,118 4,118 3,878 9
Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration 9,290 9,290 8,745 10 Cyber Security Modifications 8,513 1,131 9,644 9,380 11 DCE Update 3,897 3,897 3,669 12 GTCC Disposal 43,200 43,200 40,662 13 ISFSI CDP Settlement 4,543 4,543 4,277 14 Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 7,447 7,447 7,011 15 NIA Sump Modifications 1,150 1,150 1,081 16 Other Projects Total 19,959 180,789 200,748 189,758
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate from the CCC for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 2022 and 2035, respectively.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 26 from the CCC for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 2022 and 2035, respectively.
: c. GTCC Waste Storage As part of the DGC contract, SDS is responsible for preparing, characterizing, and packaging the GTCC waste into canisters, with the exception of the relatively small amount of GTCC waste which currently resides in the spent fuel pools and will be loaded by Holtec.
c.
GTCC Waste Storage As part of the DGC contract, SDS is responsible for preparing, characterizing, and packaging the GTCC waste into canisters, with the exception of the relatively small amount of GTCC waste which currently resides in the spent fuel pools and will be loaded by Holtec.
Holtec will supply the GTCC canisters and is also responsible for transferring the loaded GTCC waste canisters to the ISFSI pad. The estimated costs cover the purchase and licensing of GTCC canisters, as well as their transfer from the containment buildings to the ISFSI pad.
Holtec will supply the GTCC canisters and is also responsible for transferring the loaded GTCC waste canisters to the ISFSI pad. The estimated costs cover the purchase and licensing of GTCC canisters, as well as their transfer from the containment buildings to the ISFSI pad.
: d. Mesa Site Turnover SCEs Mesa site consists of five parcels leased from the Navy. Parcel 5 is on the west side of U.S. Interstate Highway 5 (I-5) and includes a security station to control access to Parcels 6 and 7. Parcels 6 and 7 are located on the east side of I-5 and comprise the largest portion of the Mesa site. Parcels 8 and 9 include a parking lot and lay-down area on the west side of I-5.
: d. Mesa Site Turnover SCEs Mesa site consists of five parcels leased from the Navy. Parcel 5 is on the west side of U.S. Interstate Highway 5 (I-5) and includes a security station to control access to Parcels 6 and 7. Parcels 6 and 7 are located on the east side of I-5 and comprise the largest portion of the Mesa site. Parcels 8 and 9 include a parking lot and lay-down area on the west side of I-5.
SCE currently estimates that Parcels 5, 6, and 7 will be returned to the Navy in 2021, and Parcels 8 & 9 will be retained until the end of decommissioning. As part of the process to return the parcels to the Navy, SCE must first remediate any contamination and obtain No Further Action Letters from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) indicating the property is available for unrestricted use. 39 The estimated cost associated with the project is based on currently anticipated remediation requirements.
SCE currently estimates that Parcels 5, 6, and 7 will be returned to the Navy in 2021, and Parcels 8 & 9 will be retained until the end of decommissioning. As part of the process to return the parcels to the Navy, SCE must first remediate any contamination and obtain No Further Action Letters from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) indicating the property is available for unrestricted use.39 The estimated cost associated with the project is based on currently anticipated remediation requirements.
: e. CEQA Permitting (California State Lands Commission)
e.
CEQA Permitting (California State Lands Commission)
Under CEQA, the CSLC, as lead agency, is required to evaluate the SONGS decommissioning project and prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in response to SCEs application to modify and extend the existing CSLC lease regarding the offshore conduits.
Under CEQA, the CSLC, as lead agency, is required to evaluate the SONGS decommissioning project and prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in response to SCEs application to modify and extend the existing CSLC lease regarding the offshore conduits.
The CEQA permitting process began in 2015. The CSLC is expected to issue a draft EIR in the second quarter of 2018 and issue its Final EIR in the third quarter of 2018. The California Coastal Commission is then expected to review an application for a CDP based on the EIR, as well as its own additional analysis. The CCC is expected to approve the CDP in the fourth quarter of 2018. Following the receipt of the CDP, the physical decommissioning of the plant can proceed.
The CEQA permitting process began in 2015. The CSLC is expected to issue a draft EIR in the second quarter of 2018 and issue its Final EIR in the third quarter of 2018. The California Coastal Commission is then expected to review an application for a CDP based on the EIR, as well as its own additional analysis. The CCC is expected to approve the CDP in the fourth quarter of 2018. Following the receipt of the CDP, the physical decommissioning of the plant can proceed.
39 On April 24, 2017, the DTSC issued a No Further Action Letter for Parcel 5. The efforts to assess and remediate contamination for Parcels 6 and 7 are ongoing. SCE continues to hold Parcel 5 as it provides access to Parcels 6 and 7.
39 On April 24, 2017, the DTSC issued a No Further Action Letter for Parcel 5. The efforts to assess and remediate contamination for Parcels 6 and 7 are ongoing. SCE continues to hold Parcel 5 as it provides access to Parcels 6 and 7.
26
%
                                                      %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 27 f.
: f. Real Estate Authorization Renewals and Plant Lease Amendments The current SONGS Plant Easement with the Navy expires in 2024. SCE will therefore seek an extension (new real estate authorization) covering the time to complete major decommissioning activities. As a federal agency, the Navy must undertake a NEPA environmental review prior to issuing a new real estate authorization. The initial NEPA process is expected to be completed in 2024 and will allow SCE to continue using the property until 2035.
Real Estate Authorization Renewals and Plant Lease Amendments The current SONGS Plant Easement with the Navy expires in 2024. SCE will therefore seek an extension (new real estate authorization) covering the time to complete major decommissioning activities. As a federal agency, the Navy must undertake a NEPA environmental review prior to issuing a new real estate authorization. The initial NEPA process is expected to be completed in 2024 and will allow SCE to continue using the property until 2035.
In 2030, SCE will begin the process to further extend the lease from 2035 until such time the property is projected to be to be turned over to the Navy. In 2040, the Navy is expected to undertake another NEPA review to determine the final site restoration conditions, including the substructure removal requirements. These end-state requirements should be determined by 2045, prior to beginning the civil works project in 2046.
In 2030, SCE will begin the process to further extend the lease from 2035 until such time the property is projected to be to be turned over to the Navy. In 2040, the Navy is expected to undertake another NEPA review to determine the final site restoration conditions, including the substructure removal requirements. These end-state requirements should be determined by 2045, prior to beginning the civil works project in 2046.
: g. Cyber Security Modifications NRC regulations require a Cyber Security Plan at SONGS to ensure certain digital assets, such as computer and communication systems and networks, are secure and protected. SCE has implemented 7 of 8 Cyber Security Plan milestones. At the end of 2017 the NRC granted approval for a license amendment to remove the cyber security license condition, thus waiving the requirement to implement Milestone 8.
g.
Cyber Security Modifications NRC regulations require a Cyber Security Plan at SONGS to ensure certain digital assets, such as computer and communication systems and networks, are secure and protected. SCE has implemented 7 of 8 Cyber Security Plan milestones. At the end of 2017 the NRC granted approval for a license amendment to remove the cyber security license condition, thus waiving the requirement to implement Milestone 8.
: h. DCE Update As part of the NDCTP, SCE is required to submit an updated DCE for approval by the CPUC.
: h. DCE Update As part of the NDCTP, SCE is required to submit an updated DCE for approval by the CPUC.
: i. GTCC Disposal Presently, a disposal facility licensed to accept GTCC waste does not exist in the United States. Courts have determined that the DOE is obligated to accept and dispose of GTCC waste; however, issues regarding costs remain unsettled. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, the cost of shipping and disposing of a GTCC canister was assumed to equal the cost associated with a canister of SONGS spent fuel. The one-mill fee per kilowatt-hour of generation under the Standard Contract was used to estimate this cost.
i.
: j. ISFSI CDP Settlement In August 2017, SCE reached a settlement agreement with parties opposed to the storage of spent fuel at SONGS. As part of that settlement, SCE agreed to incur up to $4 million on commercially reasonable efforts to identify an alternative location for SONGS spent fuel storage.
GTCC Disposal Presently, a disposal facility licensed to accept GTCC waste does not exist in the United States. Courts have determined that the DOE is obligated to accept and dispose of GTCC waste; however, issues regarding costs remain unsettled. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, the cost of shipping and disposing of a GTCC canister was assumed to equal the cost associated with a canister of SONGS spent fuel. The one-mill fee per kilowatt-hour of generation under the Standard Contract was used to estimate this cost.
27
j.
                                                  %
ISFSI CDP Settlement In August 2017, SCE reached a settlement agreement with parties opposed to the storage of spent fuel at SONGS. As part of that settlement, SCE agreed to incur up to $4 million on commercially reasonable efforts to identify an alternative location for SONGS spent fuel storage.
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate SCE also incurred third-party legal costs to reach the settlement. Given the ongoing analysis and current uncertainty relating to the potential location and requirements of an acceptable alternative spent fuel storage site, the associated costs with moving to an alternative site have not been included in this DCE.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 28 SCE also incurred third-party legal costs to reach the settlement. Given the ongoing analysis and current uncertainty relating to the potential location and requirements of an acceptable alternative spent fuel storage site, the associated costs with moving to an alternative site have not been included in this DCE.
: k. Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement In 2044, SCE will begin efforts to procure a contractor for the removal of SONGS substructures and placement of permanent backfill. The 2017 DCE therefore includes costs to cover a competitive bidding process, including the development of a Request for Proposal, proposal evaluation, and contract award. For purposes of this DCE, the effort was assumed to be approximately one-half the expended cost to procure a DGC for the major D&D work.
: k. Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement In 2044, SCE will begin efforts to procure a contractor for the removal of SONGS substructures and placement of permanent backfill. The 2017 DCE therefore includes costs to cover a competitive bidding process, including the development of a Request for Proposal, proposal evaluation, and contract award. For purposes of this DCE, the effort was assumed to be approximately one-half the expended cost to procure a DGC for the major D&D work.
: l. NIA Sump Modifications The NIA sump currently discharges to the SONGS 2&3 dilution water system. The dilution water system will be retired by SDS, and therefore the discharge pathway for the NIA sump will need to be modified. Kenrich utilized the current budget estimate provided by the cognizant SCE Project Manager.
l.
E. Undistributed Costs Undistributed costs represent activities or fees, necessary to oversee, manage and support the overall decommissioning project. Undistributed costs are sometimes referred to as collateral, indirect, or level of effort costs. By their nature, such costs are not assignable to specific activities representing the physical work performed to decommission a nuclear plant.
NIA Sump Modifications The NIA sump currently discharges to the SONGS 2&3 dilution water system. The dilution water system will be retired by SDS, and therefore the discharge pathway for the NIA sump will need to be modified. Kenrich utilized the current budget estimate provided by the cognizant SCE Project Manager.
E.
Undistributed Costs Undistributed costs represent activities or fees, necessary to oversee, manage and support the overall decommissioning project. Undistributed costs are sometimes referred to as collateral, indirect, or level of effort costs. By their nature, such costs are not assignable to specific activities representing the physical work performed to decommission a nuclear plant.
Undistributed activities and cost items are characterized by a uniform rate of activity over a specific period of time. Accordingly, undistributed costs were estimated for each decommissioning period. Within each period, the undistributed costs are incurred at a fixed rate and are thus largely time-dependent.
Undistributed activities and cost items are characterized by a uniform rate of activity over a specific period of time. Accordingly, undistributed costs were estimated for each decommissioning period. Within each period, the undistributed costs are incurred at a fixed rate and are thus largely time-dependent.
The table below summarizes the undistributed costs incurred through 2016 and future costs estimated for each decommissioning period. The costs are also segregated between labor and non-labor. The labor items include staff to provide oversight, management and other support. Non-labor items include costs associated with services performed by third-parties, as well as rents, fees, and other costs necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory and other requirements.
The table below summarizes the undistributed costs incurred through 2016 and future costs estimated for each decommissioning period. The costs are also segregated between labor and non-labor. The labor items include staff to provide oversight, management and other support. Non-labor items include costs associated with services performed by third-parties, as well as rents, fees, and other costs necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory and other requirements.
28
%
                                                  %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 8 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 29 TABLE 8 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)
Period 1       Period 2     Period 3      Period 4      Period 5      Period 6      Period 7 ISFSI Transition                                                           Demolition &
Description Period 1 Initial Activities (Nominal $)
Initial      and Pool     D&D and       D&D and                   Civil Works    Final Site      Total Activities      Storage    Pool Storage  Dry Storage   Dry Storage      Project    Restoration    (Nominal/
Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2017$)
Description            (Nominal $)      (2017$)       (2017$)       (2017$)     (2017$)       (2017$)        (2017$)        2017$)
Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2017$)
1   Start                                     6/7/2013       1/1/2017     1/1/2019     6/1/2019     1/1/2029     1/1/2046     1/1/2050 2   End                                     12/31/2016     12/31/2018     5/31/2019   12/31/2028   12/31/2045   12/31/2049   12/31/2051 3   Duration (Years)                             36            20            04            96          17 0           40            20 4 Undistributed Activities 5 Labor-Staffing 6   Site Management & Administration                       $    19,393 $      3,379 $    71,195 $    16,666 $    13,265 $      1,901 7   Plant Management                                             46,774         8,140       46,085       85,274       20,799         2,340 8   Decommissioning Oversight                                   14,417         4,916     136,266       13,417       27,121         8,919 9 Utility Staff Subtotal                   $    245,555   $    80,583 $    16,436 $    253,546 $    115,356 $    61,185 $      13,159 $    785,820 10   Security Force                               91,073         45,231         6,518       31,254       57,448       14,012         1,576       247,112 11 Labor-Staffing Subtotal                 $    336,628   $    125,814 $    22,954 $    284,800 $    172,804 $    75,196 $      14,735 $ 1,032,932 12 13 Non-Labor 14   Aging Management                       $            - $          - $          48 $      4,209 $    10,018 $      1,955 $            - $    16,230 15   Association Fees and Expenses                     817         1,332           251       3,910         1,958           478           215         8,961 16   Community Engagement Panel                     2,304         1,640           279       5,482         2,405           566           283       12,958 17   Contracted Services                           67,641         33,556         3,957       59,073       50,430       16,086         4,349       235,092 18   DAW Disposal                                         -            32             -            -            -            -              -          32 19   Decommissioning Advisor                       2,515         1,231           278       6,392             -            -              -      10,416 20   DGC Executive Oversight Committee                   -          508           144       3,306             -            -              -        3,958 21   Emergency Preparedness Fees                   9,099         3,792           864       15,081       16,998         4,146               -      49,980 22   Energy                                       16,964         7,571         2,241       45,194       10,983         4,117           526       87,596 23   Environmental Permits and Fees                 3,081           662             14         328         1,064         1,154           576         6,879 24   Ground Water Monitoring                             -            -            -            -          391             92           46           529 25   Information Technology                       12,886         5,248           479       7,494         2,486         3,033         1,365       32,991 26   Insurance                                     13,824         4,778           977       15,947       22,029         5,688         2,479       65,722 27   Third Party Legal                             4,336         2,579           479       7,571         7,648         2,300           230       25,142 28   NRC Fees                                       4,566         2,836           248       9,169       10,369         2,455         2,646       32,291 29   Office Space                                         -            -            -        1,173           391             92           92         1,748 30   Security Related Expenses                     1,552         1,209           422       1,017         5,461         2,192           526       12,378 31   Severance                                     89,594         9,135         6,001       9,782         2,367             -        6,165       123,044 32   Site Lease and Easement Expenses               8,049         5,710         1,039       21,040       47,825       11,552         5,930       101,145 33   Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE               -            -            -            -      17,940       14,628               -      32,568 34   Tools and Equipment                               49             -            -            -            -            -              -          49 35   Water                                         1,663         1,224           184       4,243         7,261         1,771           797       17,143 36   Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies         2,163           979             9         198           352             83           41         3,825 37 Non-Labor Subtotal                       $    241,104   $    84,020 $    17,913 $    220,608 $    218,376 $    72,388 $      26,266 $    880,676 38 39 Service Level Agreements                       10,647         27,510         4,518       83,094       20,521       22,210         9,143       177,643 40 DGC Staffing 41 Undistributed Activities Subtotal 42 43 Distributed Projects 44 45 Total                                                                                                                                       $ 4,702,264 29
Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2017$)
                                                                            %
Period 5 Dry Storage (2017$)
Period 6 Civil Works Project (2017$)
Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
Final Site Restoration (2017$)
Total (Nominal/
2017$)
1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4
Undistributed Activities 5
Labor-Staffing 6
Site Management & Administration 19,393 3,379 71,195 16,666 13,265 1,901 7
Plant Management 46,774 8,140 46,085 85,274 20,799 2,340 8
Decommissioning Oversight 14,417 4,916 136,266 13,417 27,121 8,919 9
Utility Staff Subtotal 245,555 80,583 16,436 253,546 115,356 61,185 13,159 785,820 10 Security Force 91,073 45,231 6,518 31,254 57,448 14,012 1,576 247,112 11 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 336,628 125,814 22,954 284,800 172,804 75,196 14,735 1,032,932 12 13 Non-Labor 14 Aging Management 48 4,209 10,018 1,955 16,230 15 Association Fees and Expenses 817 1,332 251 3,910 1,958 478 215 8,961 16 Community Engagement Panel 2,304 1,640 279 5,482 2,405 566 283 12,958 17 Contracted Services 67,641 33,556 3,957 59,073 50,430 16,086 4,349 235,092 18 DAW Disposal 32 32 19 Decommissioning Advisor 2,515 1,231 278 6,392 10,416 20 DGC Executive Oversight Committee 508 144 3,306 3,958 21 Emergency Preparedness Fees 9,099 3,792 864 15,081 16,998 4,146 49,980 22 Energy 16,964 7,571 2,241 45,194 10,983 4,117 526 87,596 23 Environmental Permits and Fees 3,081 662 14 328 1,064 1,154 576 6,879 24 Ground Water Monitoring 391 92 46 529 25 Information Technology 12,886 5,248 479 7,494 2,486 3,033 1,365 32,991 26 Insurance 13,824 4,778 977 15,947 22,029 5,688 2,479 65,722 27 Third Party Legal 4,336 2,579 479 7,571 7,648 2,300 230 25,142 28 NRC Fees 4,566 2,836 248 9,169 10,369 2,455 2,646 32,291 29 Office Space 1,173 391 92 92 1,748 30 Security Related Expenses 1,552 1,209 422 1,017 5,461 2,192 526 12,378 31 Severance 89,594 9,135 6,001 9,782 2,367 6,165 123,044 32 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 8,049 5,710 1,039 21,040 47,825 11,552 5,930 101,145 33 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 17,940 14,628 32,568 34 Tools and Equipment 49 49 35 Water 1,663 1,224 184 4,243 7,261 1,771 797 17,143 36 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 2,163 979 9
198 352 83 41 3,825 37 Non-Labor Subtotal 241,104 84,020 17,913 220,608 218,376 72,388 26,266 880,676 38 39 Service Level Agreements 10,647 27,510 4,518 83,094 20,521 22,210 9,143 177,643 40 DGC Staffing 41 Undistributed Activities Subtotal 42 43 Distributed Projects 44 45 Total 4,702,264
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 9 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (2014$ IN THOUSANDS)
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 30 TABLE 9 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (2014$ IN THOUSANDS) 1.
Period 1       Period 2        Period 3      Period 4      Period 5      Period 6      Period 7 ISFSI Transition                                                            Demolition &
Decommissioning Staffing Since January 2017, SCE and SDS have been working closely to manage and implement the transition of numerous management programs and functions from SCE to SDS. Following this transition, SCE will maintain an oversight role with respect to SDSs contract. SCE will continue to be responsible for the ISFSI project, for ongoing nuclear operations, security, and other distributed projects (e.g., ISFSI Aging Management, Mesa Turnover). Following the completion of the SDS D&D contract, SCE will take back over the performance of the on-site programs and functions that had been transitioned to SDS.
Initial      and Pool      D&D and       D&D and                   Civil Works      Final Site Activities     Storage    Pool Storage  Dry Storage  Dry Storage      Project    Restoration      Total Description                (2014$)       (2014$)         (2014$)       (2014$)     (2014$)       (2014$)         (2014$)       (2014$)
Description Period 1 Initial Activities (2014$)
1 Start                                       6/7/2013       1/1/2017       1/1/2019     6/1/2019     1/1/2029     1/1/2046       1/1/2050 2 End                                       12/31/2016     12/31/2018       5/31/2019   12/31/2028   12/31/2045   12/31/2049     12/31/2051 3 Duration (Years)                               36            20              04            96          17 0           40            20 4 Undistributed Activities 5 Labor-Staffing 6 Site Management & Administration                         $    18,179   $        3,175 $    66,883 $    15,656 $    12,462 $        1,785 7 Plant Management                                               43,882           7,647       43,293       80,109       19,539           2,198 8 Decommissioning Oversight                                     13,537           4,618     128,012       12,604       25,478           8,378 9 Utility Staff Subtotal                     $    242,544 $    75,598   $    15,440 $    238,189 $    108,369 $    57,478 $      12,362 $  749,981 10 Security Force                                   89,640       42,456           6,123       29,360       53,968       13,163           1,481     236,192 11 Labor-Staffing Subtotal                   $    332,184 $    118,054   $      21,564 $    267,549 $    162,337 $    70,641 $      13,843 $  986,172 12 13 Non-Labor 14 Aging Management                         $            - $          -  $          45 $      3,958 $      9,421 $      1,838 $            - $    15,262 15 Association Fees and Expenses                       800         1,277             237       3,701         1,882           459             207       8,564 16 Community Engagement Panel                       2,267         1,556             267       5,268         2,311           544             272       12,486 17 Contracted Services                             66,942       31,650           3,736       55,800       47,718       15,215           4,102     225,164 18 DAW Disposal                                           -            30               -            -            -            -              -          30 19 Decommissioning Advisor                           2,470         1,156             261       6,011             -            -              -      9,899 20 DGC Executive Oversight Committee                     -          477             135       3,109             -            -              -      3,722 21 Emergency Preparedness Fees                       9,047         3,645             830       14,496       16,339         3,985               -      48,341 22 Energy                                           16,840         7,277           2,154       43,440       10,557         3,957             506       84,732 23 Environmental Permits and Fees                   3,065           636               14         312         1,007         1,108             553       6,695 24 Ground Water Monitoring                               -            -              -            -          368             87             43         497 25 Information Technology                           12,845         4,945             454       7,117         2,361         2,881           1,296       31,900 26 Insurance                                       13,779         4,592             939       15,328       21,175         5,467           2,383       63,663 27 Third Party Legal                                 4,234         2,425             451       7,119         7,192         2,163             216       23,799 28 NRC Fees                                         4,539         2,725             239       8,813         9,967         2,360           2,544       31,187 29 Office Space                                           -            -              -        1,104           376             88             87       1,655 30 Security Related Expenses                         1,536         1,150             403         973         5,166         2,069             496       11,792 31 Severance                                       89,524         8,599           5,657       9,222         2,232             -          5,812     121,047 32 Site Lease and Easement Expenses                 7,996         5,488             999       20,223       45,970       11,104           5,700       97,481 33 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE                 -            -              -            -      16,870       13,756               -      30,626 34 Tools and Equipment                                   49             -              -            -            -            -              -          49 35 Water                                             1,654         1,176             177       4,078         6,979         1,702             766       16,534 36 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies             2,103           918               8         187           331             78             39       3,663 37 Non-Labor Subtotal                         $    239,691   $    79,724   $      17,005 $    210,259 $    208,221 $    68,862 $      25,023 $  848,786 38 39 Service Level Agreements                         10,278       26,121           4,288       78,793       19,278       20,865           8,589     168,212 40 DGC Staffing 41 Undistributed Activities Subtotal 42 43 Distributed Projects 44 45 Total                                                                                                                                             $ 4,478,566
Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2014$)
: 1.        Decommissioning Staffing Since January 2017, SCE and SDS have been working closely to manage and implement the transition of numerous management programs and functions from SCE to SDS. Following this transition, SCE will maintain an oversight role with respect to SDSs contract. SCE will continue to be responsible for the ISFSI project, for ongoing nuclear operations, security, and other distributed projects (e.g., ISFSI Aging Management, Mesa Turnover). Following the completion of the SDS D&D contract, SCE will take back over the performance of the on-site programs and functions that had been transitioned to SDS.
Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2014$)
30
Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2014$)
                                                                            %
Period 5 Dry Storage (2014$)
Period 6 Civil Works Project (2014$)
Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
Final Site Restoration (2014$)
Total (2014$)
1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4
Undistributed Activities 5
Labor-Staffing 6
Site Management & Administration 18,179 3,175 66,883 15,656 12,462 1,785 7
Plant Management 43,882 7,647 43,293 80,109 19,539 2,198 8
Decommissioning Oversight 13,537 4,618 128,012 12,604 25,478 8,378 9
Utility Staff Subtotal 242,544 75,598 15,440 238,189 108,369 57,478 12,362 749,981 10 Security Force 89,640 42,456 6,123 29,360 53,968 13,163 1,481 236,192 11 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 332,184 118,054 21,564 267,549 162,337 70,641 13,843 986,172 12 13 Non-Labor 14 Aging Management 45 3,958 9,421 1,838 15,262 15 Association Fees and Expenses 800 1,277 237 3,701 1,882 459 207 8,564 16 Community Engagement Panel 2,267 1,556 267 5,268 2,311 544 272 12,486 17 Contracted Services 66,942 31,650 3,736 55,800 47,718 15,215 4,102 225,164 18 DAW Disposal 30 30 19 Decommissioning Advisor 2,470 1,156 261 6,011 9,899 20 DGC Executive Oversight Committee 477 135 3,109 3,722 21 Emergency Preparedness Fees 9,047 3,645 830 14,496 16,339 3,985 48,341 22 Energy 16,840 7,277 2,154 43,440 10,557 3,957 506 84,732 23 Environmental Permits and Fees 3,065 636 14 312 1,007 1,108 553 6,695 24 Ground Water Monitoring 368 87 43 497 25 Information Technology 12,845 4,945 454 7,117 2,361 2,881 1,296 31,900 26 Insurance 13,779 4,592 939 15,328 21,175 5,467 2,383 63,663 27 Third Party Legal 4,234 2,425 451 7,119 7,192 2,163 216 23,799 28 NRC Fees 4,539 2,725 239 8,813 9,967 2,360 2,544 31,187 29 Office Space 1,104 376 88 87 1,655 30 Security Related Expenses 1,536 1,150 403 973 5,166 2,069 496 11,792 31 Severance 89,524 8,599 5,657 9,222 2,232 5,812 121,047 32 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 7,996 5,488 999 20,223 45,970 11,104 5,700 97,481 33 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 16,870 13,756 30,626 34 Tools and Equipment 49 49 35 Water 1,654 1,176 177 4,078 6,979 1,702 766 16,534 36 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 2,103 918 8
187 331 78 39 3,663 37 Non-Labor Subtotal 239,691 79,724 17,005 210,259 208,221 68,862 25,023 848,786 38 39 Service Level Agreements 10,278 26,121 4,288 78,793 19,278 20,865 8,589 168,212 40 DGC Staffing 41 Undistributed Activities Subtotal 42 43 Distributed Projects 44 45 Total 4,478,566
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate With contracts now in place for the majority of the SONGS decommissioning work, SCE was able to carefully evaluate its own staffing needs. As part of the process to develop the staffing projections, each SONGS division was grouped into the following categories.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 31 With contracts now in place for the majority of the SONGS decommissioning work, SCE was able to carefully evaluate its own staffing needs. As part of the process to develop the staffing projections, each SONGS division was grouped into the following categories.
Site Management & Administration - Responsible for oversight and strategic planning, ensuring compliance with regulatory and permitting requirements, safety, security, and overall project cost and schedule.
Site Management & Administration - Responsible for oversight and strategic planning, ensuring compliance with regulatory and permitting requirements, safety, security, and overall project cost and schedule.
Plant Management - Responsible for the operations, maintenance, and security of the plant facilities. Staffing levels are expected to decrease significantly after the nuclear fuel is transferred from the spent fuel pool to the ISFSI pad.
Plant Management - Responsible for the operations, maintenance, and security of the plant facilities. Staffing levels are expected to decrease significantly after the nuclear fuel is transferred from the spent fuel pool to the ISFSI pad.
Project Oversight - Responsible for oversight of the SDS D&D contract, management of the ISFSI, and other distributed projects. The oversight role ensures all work is completed safely and in compliance with the contract, government regulations, and permits. The staffing levels will vary over the duration of the project based on the amount of physical work being performed (e.g., the number of radiological oversight personnel will decrease after D&D is complete).
Project Oversight - Responsible for oversight of the SDS D&D contract, management of the ISFSI, and other distributed projects. The oversight role ensures all work is completed safely and in compliance with the contract, government regulations, and permits. The staffing levels will vary over the duration of the project based on the amount of physical work being performed (e.g., the number of radiological oversight personnel will decrease after D&D is complete).
As part of the process to estimate staffing needs, senior management met with SONGS division managers to identify major activities during each phase of the decommissioning project.
As part of the process to estimate staffing needs, senior management met with SONGS division managers to identify major activities during each phase of the decommissioning project.
The estimated staffing for each period was based on a bottom up assessment of each needed discipline and position. Kenrich also worked with SCE management to vet the underlying assumptions and confirm the rationale underlying the projections. This effort involved numerous interviews of SONGS division managers, an analysis of the plan to transition management and supervision responsibilities from SCE to SDS, and a reconciliation to the staffing levels in the 2014 DCE. 40 Staffing levels at other utilities having nuclear decommissioning experience were reviewed and considered, while also taking into account site-specific requirements and characteristics of SONGS. To further ensure the reasonableness of the SONGS staffing projections, SCE retained ABZ, an industry expert in decommissioning cost estimating. SCE specifically requested ABZ to provide input based on their experiences working with other nuclear utilities and to confirm that the SONGS projections were in line with industry norms.
The estimated staffing for each period was based on a bottom up assessment of each needed discipline and position. Kenrich also worked with SCE management to vet the underlying assumptions and confirm the rationale underlying the projections. This effort involved numerous interviews of SONGS division managers, an analysis of the plan to transition management and supervision responsibilities from SCE to SDS, and a reconciliation to the staffing levels in the 2014 DCE.40 Staffing levels at other utilities having nuclear decommissioning experience were reviewed and considered, while also taking into account site-specific requirements and characteristics of SONGS. To further ensure the reasonableness of the SONGS staffing projections, SCE retained ABZ, an industry expert in decommissioning cost estimating. SCE specifically requested ABZ to provide input based on their experiences working with other nuclear utilities and to confirm that the SONGS projections were in line with industry norms.
The table below summarizes the staffing projection by period. The average staffing levels estimated for each period are intended to account for anticipated adjustments within each decommissioning period.
The table below summarizes the staffing projection by period. The average staffing levels estimated for each period are intended to account for anticipated adjustments within each decommissioning period.
40 The 2014 DCE did not assume the transition of programs to the DGC, therefore the headcount for certain divisions, such as maintenance and radiological control and chemistry, decreased in the 2017 DCE, but the decommissioning oversight positions increased in the 2017 DCE.
40 The 2014 DCE did not assume the transition of programs to the DGC, therefore the headcount for certain divisions, such as maintenance and radiological control and chemistry, decreased in the 2017 DCE, but the decommissioning oversight positions increased in the 2017 DCE.  
31
%
                                                        %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 10 UTILITY & SECURITY FORCE AVERAGE STAFFING BY PERIOD 41 Period 2      Period 3    Period 4    Period 5    Period 6      Period 7 ISFSI Transition                                                      Demolition &
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 32 TABLE 10 UTILITY & SECURITY FORCE AVERAGE STAFFING BY PERIOD41 The costs associated with the projected staffing is based on average labor rates for each position. The staffing cost estimate includes labor burdens and short-term incentive compensation, and accounts for positions being filled by contractors.
and Pool    D&D and      D&D and                  Civil Works    Final Site Description              Storage    Pool Storage Dry Storage  Dry Storage    Project    Restoration 1  Start                                  1/1/2017      1/1/2019    6/1/2019    1/1/2029    1/1/2046      1/1/2050 2  End                                    12/31/2018    5/31/2019  12/31/2028  12/31/2045  12/31/2049    12/31/2051 3  Duration (Years)                          20            04          96          17 0          40          20 4
5 Site Management & Administration 6  Site Management & Administration                16          11          10            1            3              -
7  Decommissioning Finance                          5            8          8            1            4              1 8  Regulatory Affairs & Nuclear Oversight          10            8          8            2            4              4 9 Total Site Management & Administration          30            27          26            4            11              5 10 11 Plant Management 12  Plant Management                                  1            1          1            1            1              -
13  Operations                                      40            36            -            -            -              -
14  Radiological Control & Chemistry                13            -            -            -            -              -
15  Maintenance, Work Control, & PI/CAP            18            7          7            7            7              3 16  Engineering                                    15            7          7            7            7              3 17  EP Planning                                      3            3          2            2            2              1 18  Security                                      155          158          34          34            34            14 19 Total Plant Management                          244          212          51          51            51            20 20 21 Decommissioning Oversight                        23          38          45            -          22            16 22 23 Total                                          296          277        122          55            84            41 The costs associated with the projected staffing is based on average labor rates for each position. The staffing cost estimate includes labor burdens and short-term incentive compensation, and accounts for positions being filled by contractors.
The table below summarizes the labor-staffing costs by each project period.
The table below summarizes the labor-staffing costs by each project period.
41 Excludes DGC staffing and third-party contractors at SONGS.
41 Excludes DGC staffing and third-party contractors at SONGS.
32
Description Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage Period 5 Dry Storage Period 6 Civil Works Project Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
                                                          %
Final Site Restoration 1
Start 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4
5 Site Management & Administration 6
Site Management & Administration 16 11 10 1
3 7
Decommissioning Finance 5
8 8
1 4
1 8
Regulatory Affairs & Nuclear Oversight 10 8
8 2
4 4
9 Total Site Management & Administration 30 27 26 4
11 5
10 11 Plant Management 12 Plant Management 1
1 1
1 1
13 Operations 40 36 14 Radiological Control & Chemistry 13 15 Maintenance, Work Control, & PI/CAP 18 7
7 7
7 3
16 Engineering 15 7
7 7
7 3
17 EP Planning 3
3 2
2 2
1 18 Security 155 158 34 34 34 14 19 Total Plant Management 244 212 51 51 51 20 20 21 Decommissioning Oversight 23 38 45 22 16 22 23 Total 296 277 122 55 84 41
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 11 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 33 TABLE 11 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)
Period 1       Period 2     Period 3      Period 4    Period 5    Period 6      Period 7 ISFSI Transition                                                       Demolition &
TABLE 12 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (2014$ IN THOUSANDS) 2.
Initial      and Pool     D&D and       D&D and                 Civil Works    Final Site      Total Activities      Storage  Pool Storage  Dry Storage Dry Storage    Project    Restoration    (Nominal/
Undistributed Non-Labor Costs In addition to staffing, SCE incurs non-labor costs to support the decommissioning efforts. As part of the process to identify and estimate future non-labor costs, historical recorded costs were reviewed in detail. Kenrich worked with knowledgeable SONGS personnel to develop and estimate future decommissioning costs which are summarized in Table 13 and broken down below.
Description          (Nominal)        (2017$)     (2017$)       (2017$)     (2017$)     (2017$)        (2017$)      2017$)
Description Period 1 Initial Activities (Nominal)
1 Start                             6/7/2013       1/1/2017     1/1/2019     6/1/2019     1/1/2029     1/1/2046     1/1/2050 2 End                               12/31/2016     12/31/2018   5/31/2019   12/31/2028   12/31/2045   12/31/2049   12/31/2051 3 Duration (Years)                       36            20          04            96          17 0         40            20 4 Utility Staff 5 Site Management & Administration               $    19,393 $      3,379 $    71,195 $    16,666 $    13,265 $        1,901 6 Plant Management                                     46,774         8,140       46,085       85,274       20,799         2,340 7 Decommissioning Oversight                             14,417         4,916     136,266       13,417       27,121         8,919 8 Utility Staff Subtotal           $    245,555 $    80,583 $    16,436 $    253,546 $    115,356 $    61,185 $    13,159 $    785,820 9 Security Force                         91,073       45,231         6,518       31,254       57,448       14,012         1,576     247,112 10 Labor-Staffing Total             $    336,628 $    125,814 $    22,954 $    284,800 $    172,804 $    75,196 $      14,735 $ 1,032,932 TABLE 12 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (2014$ IN THOUSANDS)
Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2017$)
Period 1      Period 2     Period 3      Period 4    Period 5    Period 6      Period 7 ISFSI Transition                                                       Demolition &
Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2017$)
Initial      and Pool     D&D and       D&D and                 Civil Works    Final Site Activities      Storage  Pool Storage  Dry Storage Dry Storage    Project    Restoration      Total Description            (2014$)       (2014$)     (2014$)       (2014$)     (2014$)      (2014$)        (2014$)      (2014$)
Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2017$)
1 Start                             6/7/2013       1/1/2017     1/1/2019     6/1/2019     1/1/2029     1/1/2046     1/1/2050 2 End                               12/31/2016     12/31/2018   5/31/2019   12/31/2028   12/31/2045   12/31/2049   12/31/2051 3 Duration (Years)                       36            20          04            96          17 0         40            20 4 Utility Staff 5 Site Management & Administration               $    18,179 $      3,175 $    66,883 $    15,656 $    12,462 $        1,785 6 Plant Management                                     43,882         7,647       43,293       80,109       19,539         2,198 7 Decommissioning Oversight                             13,537         4,618     128,012       12,604       25,478         8,378 8 Utility Staff Subtotal           $    242,544 $    75,598 $    15,440 $    238,189 $    108,369 $    57,478 $    12,362 $    749,981 9 Security Force                         89,640       42,456         6,123       29,360       53,968       13,163         1,481     236,192 10 Labor-Staffing Total             $    332,184 $    118,054 $    21,564 $    267,549 $    162,337 $    70,641 $      13,843 $    986,172
Period 5 Dry Storage (2017$)
: 2.      Undistributed Non-Labor Costs In addition to staffing, SCE incurs non-labor costs to support the decommissioning efforts. As part of the process to identify and estimate future non-labor costs, historical recorded costs were reviewed in detail. Kenrich worked with knowledgeable SONGS personnel to develop and estimate future decommissioning costs which are summarized in Table 13 and broken down below.
Period 6 Civil Works Project (2017$)
33
Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
                                                                      %
Final Site Restoration (2017$)
Total (Nominal/
2017$)
1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4
Utility Staff 5
Site Management & Administration 19,393 3,379 71,195 16,666 13,265 1,901 6
Plant Management 46,774 8,140 46,085 85,274 20,799 2,340 7
Decommissioning Oversight 14,417 4,916 136,266 13,417 27,121 8,919 8
Utility Staff Subtotal 245,555 80,583 16,436 253,546 115,356 61,185 13,159 785,820 9
Security Force 91,073 45,231 6,518 31,254 57,448 14,012 1,576 247,112 10 Labor-Staffing Total 336,628 125,814 22,954 284,800 172,804 75,196 14,735 1,032,932 Description Period 1 Initial Activities (2014$)
Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2014$)
Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2014$)
Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2014$)
Period 5 Dry Storage (2014$)
Period 6 Civil Works Project (2014$)
Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
Final Site Restoration (2014$)
Total (2014$)
1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4
Utility Staff 5
Site Management & Administration 18,179 3,175 66,883 15,656 12,462 1,785 6
Plant Management 43,882 7,647 43,293 80,109 19,539 2,198 7
Decommissioning Oversight 13,537 4,618 128,012 12,604 25,478 8,378 8
Utility Staff Subtotal 242,544 75,598 15,440 238,189 108,369 57,478 12,362 749,981 9
Security Force 89,640 42,456 6,123 29,360 53,968 13,163 1,481 236,192 10 Labor-Staffing Total 332,184 118,054 21,564 267,549 162,337 70,641 13,843 986,172
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 13 UNDISTRIBUTED NON-LABOR COST ESTIMATE
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 34 TABLE 13 UNDISTRIBUTED NON-LABOR COST ESTIMATE
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN THOUSANDS) a.
Recorded      Estimate To    Total Estimate  Total Estimate Through 2016      Complete      At Completion    At Completion Description                (Nominal $)      (2017$)    (Nominal /2017$)      (2014$)
Aging Management Aging Management programs cover both the Areva and Holtec dry storage systems. In addition to the scope covered by the distributed Aging Management project, the programs include annual facility maintenance and inspection as well as in-service canister inspections every five years, in compliance with the respective Areva and Holtec SARs.
1 Non-Labor 2  Aging Management                          $            - $      16,230  $        16,230  $        15,262 3  Association Fees and Expenses                        817          8,144              8,961            8,564 4  Community Engagement Panel                          2,304          10,653            12,958          12,486 5  Contracted Services                                67,641        167,451          235,092          225,164 6  DAW Disposal                                            -              32                32              30 7  Decommissioning Advisor                            2,515          7,901            10,416            9,899 8  DGC Executive Oversight Committee                        -          3,958              3,958            3,722 9 Emergency Preparedness Fees                          9,099          40,881            49,980          48,341 10  Energy                                            16,964          70,631            87,596          84,732 11  Environmental Permits and Fees                      3,081          3,798              6,879            6,695 12  Ground Water Monitoring                                  -            529              529              497 13  Information Technology                            12,886          20,105            32,991          31,900 14  Insurance                                          13,824          51,898            65,722          63,663 15  Third Party Legal                                  4,336          20,807            25,142          23,799 16  NRC Fees                                            4,566          27,724            32,291          31,187 17  Office Space                                            -          1,748              1,748            1,655 18  Security Related Expenses                          1,552          10,826            12,378          11,792 19  Severance                                          89,594          33,450          123,044          121,047 20  Site Lease and Easement Expenses                    8,049          93,096          101,145          97,481 21  Tools and Equipment                                    49                -                49              49 22  Water                                              1,663          15,480            17,143          16,534 23  Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies              2,163          1,662              3,825            3,663 24  Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE                  -        32,568            32,568          30,626 25 Non-Labor Total                              $      241,104  $      639,572  $      880,676  $      848,786
: a. Aging Management Aging Management programs cover both the Areva and Holtec dry storage systems. In addition to the scope covered by the distributed Aging Management project, the programs include annual facility maintenance and inspection as well as in-service canister inspections every five years, in compliance with the respective Areva and Holtec SARs.
The Areva Aging Management undistributed costs begin in 2022, after the NRC Certificate of Compliance is renewed. These costs continue until the DOE is assumed to accept the final Areva canister from SONGS in 2037. The Holtec Aging Management costs begin in 2019 after all of the fuel has been transferred from the SONGS 2&3 spent pools to the ISFSI, and then continue until the DOE is assumed to accept the final Holtec canister in 2049.
The Areva Aging Management undistributed costs begin in 2022, after the NRC Certificate of Compliance is renewed. These costs continue until the DOE is assumed to accept the final Areva canister from SONGS in 2037. The Holtec Aging Management costs begin in 2019 after all of the fuel has been transferred from the SONGS 2&3 spent pools to the ISFSI, and then continue until the DOE is assumed to accept the final Holtec canister in 2049.
: b. Association Fees and Other Expenses Association Fees and Other Expenses include Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) membership fees, costs related to an external Nuclear Oversight Board (NOB), and an outside 34
: b. Association Fees and Other Expenses Association Fees and Other Expenses include Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) membership fees, costs related to an external Nuclear Oversight Board (NOB), and an outside Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)
                                                        %
Estimate To Complete (2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)
1 Non-Labor 2
Aging Management 16,230 16,230 15,262 3
Association Fees and Expenses 817 8,144 8,961 8,564 4
Community Engagement Panel 2,304 10,653 12,958 12,486 5
Contracted Services 67,641 167,451 235,092 225,164 6
DAW Disposal 32 32 30 7
Decommissioning Advisor 2,515 7,901 10,416 9,899 8
DGC Executive Oversight Committee 3,958 3,958 3,722 9
Emergency Preparedness Fees 9,099 40,881 49,980 48,341 10 Energy 16,964 70,631 87,596 84,732 11 Environmental Permits and Fees 3,081 3,798 6,879 6,695 12 Ground Water Monitoring 529 529 497 13 Information Technology 12,886 20,105 32,991 31,900 14 Insurance 13,824 51,898 65,722 63,663 15 Third Party Legal 4,336 20,807 25,142 23,799 16 NRC Fees 4,566 27,724 32,291 31,187 17 Office Space 1,748 1,748 1,655 18 Security Related Expenses 1,552 10,826 12,378 11,792 19 Severance 89,594 33,450 123,044 121,047 20 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 8,049 93,096 101,145 97,481 21 Tools and Equipment 49 49 49 22 Water 1,663 15,480 17,143 16,534 23 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 2,163 1,662 3,825 3,663 24 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 32,568 32,568 30,626 25 Non-Labor Total 241,104 639,572 880,676 848,786
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate advisor to SCEs Internal Nuclear Management Group (INMG). SCE remains an NEI member to obtain access to industry policies, standards, and guidance regarding decommissioning. The NOB is composed of independent review specialists who provide independent review of decommissioning activities.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 35 advisor to SCEs Internal Nuclear Management Group (INMG). SCE remains an NEI member to obtain access to industry policies, standards, and guidance regarding decommissioning. The NOB is composed of independent review specialists who provide independent review of decommissioning activities.
NEI Fees are estimated to be incurred through Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition & Final Site Restoration); NOB costs are expected through Period 4 (major D&D); and SCE anticipates retaining an outside advisor to the INMG until 2022.
NEI Fees are estimated to be incurred through Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition & Final Site Restoration); NOB costs are expected through Period 4 (major D&D); and SCE anticipates retaining an outside advisor to the INMG until 2022.
: c. Community Engagement Panel The SONGS Community Engagement Panel (CEP) holds periodic meetings with the public to provide information on various issues, including decommissioning plans, spent fuel management, emergency planning, security, and the environmental review process. CEP costs are estimated to be incurred through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition & Final Site Restoration). The annual estimate is based on the 2018 budgeted amounts per CEP meeting, and is adjusted proportionately based on the number of meetings estimated each year. Six CEP meetings are assumed in 2018, four CEP meetings per year are estimated during major D&D, through 2028, and one meeting per year is assumed after major D&D is complete.
c.
Community Engagement Panel The SONGS Community Engagement Panel (CEP) holds periodic meetings with the public to provide information on various issues, including decommissioning plans, spent fuel management, emergency planning, security, and the environmental review process. CEP costs are estimated to be incurred through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition & Final Site Restoration). The annual estimate is based on the 2018 budgeted amounts per CEP meeting, and is adjusted proportionately based on the number of meetings estimated each year. Six CEP meetings are assumed in 2018, four CEP meetings per year are estimated during major D&D, through 2028, and one meeting per year is assumed after major D&D is complete.
: d. Contracted Services Contracted Services generally consist of shorter-term supplemental resources, specialty contractors and consultants, third-party services, materials, equipment, and supplies. SONGS senior management, division managers, and Kenrich worked together to identify and estimate the projected costs. Contracted Services costs were estimated for each decommissioning period in each of the following divisions: (1) Decommissioning Projects / Decommissioning Oversight; (2) Engineering; (3) Emergency Preparedness; (4) Maintenance; (5) Nuclear Oversight, Safety, Regulatory Affairs; (6) Operations; (7) Decommissioning Finance; and (8) Site Management &
: d. Contracted Services Contracted Services generally consist of shorter-term supplemental resources, specialty contractors and consultants, third-party services, materials, equipment, and supplies. SONGS senior management, division managers, and Kenrich worked together to identify and estimate the projected costs. Contracted Services costs were estimated for each decommissioning period in each of the following divisions: (1) Decommissioning Projects / Decommissioning Oversight; (2) Engineering; (3) Emergency Preparedness; (4) Maintenance; (5) Nuclear Oversight, Safety, Regulatory Affairs; (6) Operations; (7) Decommissioning Finance; and (8) Site Management &
Administration.
Administration.
Similar to the undistributed staffing, the projected needs for Contracted Services are reduced after major decommissioning milestones are achieved. For example:
Similar to the undistributed staffing, the projected needs for Contracted Services are reduced after major decommissioning milestones are achieved. For example:
x   Transition of SONGS Programs to SDS - SDS will assume responsibility for the management of numerous SONGS programs by the end of 2017.
x Transition of SONGS Programs to SDS - SDS will assume responsibility for the management of numerous SONGS programs by the end of 2017.
Accordingly, the estimated costs for contracted services in the Maintenance and Decommissioning Projects divisions are significantly lower in 2018.
Accordingly, the estimated costs for contracted services in the Maintenance and Decommissioning Projects divisions are significantly lower in 2018.
x   Completion of Fuel Transfer Operations - After all spent fuel has been transferred to the ISFSI, the Operations division and its associated contracted services will no longer be needed.
x Completion of Fuel Transfer Operations - After all spent fuel has been transferred to the ISFSI, the Operations division and its associated contracted services will no longer be needed.
35
%
                                                  %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate x   D&D Complete - Many of the contracted services costs in the Decommissioning Oversight and Site Management & Administration divisions will not be needed after SDS completes its work and the SONGS programs are reduced.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 36 x
: e. Decommissioning Advisor The Decommissioning Advisor provides subject matter expertise and assistance on various matters, including regulatory issues, spent fuel storage, and project management.
D&D Complete - Many of the contracted services costs in the Decommissioning Oversight and Site Management & Administration divisions will not be needed after SDS completes its work and the SONGS programs are reduced.
e.
Decommissioning Advisor The Decommissioning Advisor provides subject matter expertise and assistance on various matters, including regulatory issues, spent fuel storage, and project management.
Decommissioning Advisor costs are estimated through Period 4 (D&D).
Decommissioning Advisor costs are estimated through Period 4 (D&D).
: f. DGC Executive Oversight Committee The SDS D&D contract requires an Executive Oversight Committee composed of five individuals charged with resolving contractual issues. The committee includes one person each from SCE and SDS, and three independent third-party members. SCE and SDS share the costs of the third-party positions.
f.
: g. Emergency Preparedness Fees SCE provides funding to local jurisdictions for the management of radiological emergency preparedness, including planning, response, and recovery activities. Currently, SCE pays fees in accordance with a December 2015 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) covering a period through 2020. The Emergency Preparedness fees are assumed to be paid annually until all spent fuel has been removed from SONGS.
DGC Executive Oversight Committee The SDS D&D contract requires an Executive Oversight Committee composed of five individuals charged with resolving contractual issues. The committee includes one person each from SCE and SDS, and three independent third-party members. SCE and SDS share the costs of the third-party positions.
g.
Emergency Preparedness Fees SCE provides funding to local jurisdictions for the management of radiological emergency preparedness, including planning, response, and recovery activities. Currently, SCE pays fees in accordance with a December 2015 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) covering a period through 2020. The Emergency Preparedness fees are assumed to be paid annually until all spent fuel has been removed from SONGS.
: h. Energy SCE must purchase energy from the grid to power the site, including loads required for decommissioning work. The energy costs are based on historical retail electricity rates and on projected usage. The projected usage was prepared by SCE Engineering and reflects the major activities in each decommissioning period.
: h. Energy SCE must purchase energy from the grid to power the site, including loads required for decommissioning work. The energy costs are based on historical retail electricity rates and on projected usage. The projected usage was prepared by SCE Engineering and reflects the major activities in each decommissioning period.
: i. Environmental Permits And Fees SONGS must comply with a variety of environmental regulations and maintain numerous permits, which involve the payment of fees. These permits and associated fees include: (1) the State Water Resource Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit fees and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) fees; (2) State of California Board of Equalization mixed waste fees; (3) fees for the California Department of Environmental Health Permit, which includes the permit for Underground Storage Tanks; (4) Air Pollution Control District Permit (APCD) fees; (5) Diesel Generator permit fees; (6) California Coastal 36
i.
                                                %
Environmental Permits And Fees SONGS must comply with a variety of environmental regulations and maintain numerous permits, which involve the payment of fees. These permits and associated fees include: (1) the State Water Resource Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit fees and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) fees; (2) State of California Board of Equalization mixed waste fees; (3) fees for the California Department of Environmental Health Permit, which includes the permit for Underground Storage Tanks; (4) Air Pollution Control District Permit (APCD) fees; (5) Diesel Generator permit fees; (6) California Coastal  
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Commission fees; (7) Refrigerant Management Program; and (8) Kelp consortium costs for monitoring and surveying ocean kelp.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 37 Commission fees; (7) Refrigerant Management Program; and (8) Kelp consortium costs for monitoring and surveying ocean kelp.
During the D&D period, SDS will be responsible for certain permits and fees, including the NPDES permit, mixed waste fee, SWPPP fee, and APCD permit. However, SCE will continue to maintain other permits and incur other fees (e.g. Department of Environmental Health fees, Diesel Generator air permits, CCC fees, and Refrigerant Management Program fees) through this period.
During the D&D period, SDS will be responsible for certain permits and fees, including the NPDES permit, mixed waste fee, SWPPP fee, and APCD permit. However, SCE will continue to maintain other permits and incur other fees (e.g. Department of Environmental Health fees, Diesel Generator air permits, CCC fees, and Refrigerant Management Program fees) through this period.
: j. Ground Water Monitoring SCE is required to monitor the ground water beneath the site for the presence of tritium.
j.
Ground Water Monitoring SCE is required to monitor the ground water beneath the site for the presence of tritium.
The costs include sampling, analysis, and monitoring performed by third-party contractors and will be required through the end of SONGS decommissioning. During the D&D period, SDS will assume responsibility for ground water monitoring.
The costs include sampling, analysis, and monitoring performed by third-party contractors and will be required through the end of SONGS decommissioning. During the D&D period, SDS will assume responsibility for ground water monitoring.
: k. Information Technology Information Technology (IT) costs include SONGS software and network licenses, internal technical support, and payments to network service providers. IT costs are expected to decrease after 2018 after one-time IT projects are completed, and ongoing support costs will be reduced after 2019. 42
: k. Information Technology Information Technology (IT) costs include SONGS software and network licenses, internal technical support, and payments to network service providers. IT costs are expected to decrease after 2018 after one-time IT projects are completed, and ongoing support costs will be reduced after 2019.42 l.
: l. Insurance NRC regulations require that SCE maintains a minimum level of nuclear liability and property insurance, including Nuclear Property Insurance (provided by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited) and Nuclear Liability Insurance (provided by American Nuclear Insurers). 43 SCE must maintain nuclear-related insurance coverage until the spent nuclear fuel is removed from the SONGS site. 44 In addition, SCE also maintains General Liability Insurance and Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance, the cost of which is generally a function of SONGS headcount.
Insurance NRC regulations require that SCE maintains a minimum level of nuclear liability and property insurance, including Nuclear Property Insurance (provided by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited) and Nuclear Liability Insurance (provided by American Nuclear Insurers).43 SCE must maintain nuclear-related insurance coverage until the spent nuclear fuel is removed from the SONGS site.44 In addition, SCE also maintains General Liability Insurance and Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance, the cost of which is generally a function of SONGS headcount.
Historical costs were used as the primary basis to estimate future insurance costs.
Historical costs were used as the primary basis to estimate future insurance costs.
42 Separately, SONGS also incurs costs associated with support provided by SCE corporate IT personnel and resources. The costs for such additional IT support are provided via a Service Level Agreement with SCE.
42 Separately, SONGS also incurs costs associated with support provided by SCE corporate IT personnel and resources. The costs for such additional IT support are provided via a Service Level Agreement with SCE.
43 Should the Participants choose to reduce current insurance coverage amounts, the future premiums would be reduced accordingly. In December 2017, the Participants received an exemption from the NRC allowing them to reduce insurance coverage.
43 Should the Participants choose to reduce current insurance coverage amounts, the future premiums would be reduced accordingly. In December 2017, the Participants received an exemption from the NRC allowing them to reduce insurance coverage.
44 Insurance requirements per NRC regulations 10 C.F.R § 50.54(w) and 10 C.F.R § 140.11.
44 Insurance requirements per NRC regulations 10 C.F.R § 50.54(w) and 10 C.F.R § 140.11.  
37
%
                                                        %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 38
: m. Third Party Legal SCE retains outside counsel as necessary to handle legal matters that require specific expertise, or when legal matters require additional resources. For example, SCE engaged outside counsel to support decommissioning licensing proceedings before the NRC, and environmental/land use permitting proceedings before the CCC, CSLC, and other government agencies.
: m. Third Party Legal SCE retains outside counsel as necessary to handle legal matters that require specific expertise, or when legal matters require additional resources. For example, SCE engaged outside counsel to support decommissioning licensing proceedings before the NRC, and environmental/land use permitting proceedings before the CCC, CSLC, and other government agencies.
: n. NRC Fees The NRC charges two different types of fees to nuclear reactor licensees: (1) annual fees (Part 171 Fees), and (2) inspection fees (Part 170 Fees). The Part 171 Fees are fixed annual payments per licensee (i.e., an annual fee for each SONGS unit), including nuclear plants that have been permanently retired. The Part 171 fees are to cover generic (i.e., non-licensee specific) activities performed by the NRC. In contrast, the NRC charges licensees Part 170 Fees based on the time it spends on performance reviews, evaluations, incident investigations, and other activities that are specific to an individual licensee.
: n. NRC Fees The NRC charges two different types of fees to nuclear reactor licensees: (1) annual fees (Part 171 Fees), and (2) inspection fees (Part 170 Fees). The Part 171 Fees are fixed annual payments per licensee (i.e., an annual fee for each SONGS unit), including nuclear plants that have been permanently retired. The Part 171 fees are to cover generic (i.e., non-licensee specific) activities performed by the NRC. In contrast, the NRC charges licensees Part 170 Fees based on the time it spends on performance reviews, evaluations, incident investigations, and other activities that are specific to an individual licensee.
: o. Office Space Following the completion of major D&D, SCE will need to lease office space for the remaining employees as all the existing office space on the SONGS site will have been removed.
o.
Office Space Following the completion of major D&D, SCE will need to lease office space for the remaining employees as all the existing office space on the SONGS site will have been removed.
The costs to install trailers and annual lease payments are included in the estimate. During major D&D, SDS is responsible for providing SCEs office space.
The costs to install trailers and annual lease payments are included in the estimate. During major D&D, SDS is responsible for providing SCEs office space.
: p. Security Related Expenses Security Related Expenses include uniforms, weapons, ammunition, and other supplies and equipment to support the SONGS Security Force, as well as background investigations, training costs, and vendor support.
: p. Security Related Expenses Security Related Expenses include uniforms, weapons, ammunition, and other supplies and equipment to support the SONGS Security Force, as well as background investigations, training costs, and vendor support.
: q. Severance Under the California Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning Act of 1985, 45 SCE employees at SONGS who are severed as a result of the shutdown and permanent retirement of SONGS are eligible for severance benefits. These benefits include lump sum cash payments based on years of service, outplacement services, and reimbursement for educational expenses.
: q. Severance Under the California Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning Act of 1985,45 SCE employees at SONGS who are severed as a result of the shutdown and permanent retirement of SONGS are eligible for severance benefits. These benefits include lump sum cash payments based on years of service, outplacement services, and reimbursement for educational expenses.
45 California Public Utilities Code § 8322(g).
45 California Public Utilities Code § 8322(g).
38
%
                                                  %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 39 r.
: r. Site Lease And Easements SCE makes annual lease and easement payments to the Navy for the SONGS plant site and Mesa, and to the CSLC for the SONGS offshore conduits. The current site lease with the Navy ends in 2024. As previously discussed, SCE expects to negotiate a new lease to cover the period after 2024 through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration).
Site Lease And Easements SCE makes annual lease and easement payments to the Navy for the SONGS plant site and Mesa, and to the CSLC for the SONGS offshore conduits. The current site lease with the Navy ends in 2024. As previously discussed, SCE expects to negotiate a new lease to cover the period after 2024 through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration).
The rate per acre in the new plant site lease agreement is expected to increase to account for the fair market value of the property.
The rate per acre in the new plant site lease agreement is expected to increase to account for the fair market value of the property.
The Mesa lease payments to the Navy are expected to remain consistent with the current agreement until Mesa Parcels 5, 6, and 7 are returned to the Navy in 2021. The conduits lease payments to the CSLC are expected to remain consistent with the current agreement, which includes periodic increases in lease payments, through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration).
The Mesa lease payments to the Navy are expected to remain consistent with the current agreement until Mesa Parcels 5, 6, and 7 are returned to the Navy in 2021. The conduits lease payments to the CSLC are expected to remain consistent with the current agreement, which includes periodic increases in lease payments, through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration).
: s. Water Utilities includes expenses for water provided by the South Coast Water District (SCWD)
s.
Water Utilities includes expenses for water provided by the South Coast Water District (SCWD)
Joint Regional Water Supply System (JRWSS). Costs were estimated based on historical recorded costs.
Joint Regional Water Supply System (JRWSS). Costs were estimated based on historical recorded costs.
: t. Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Health Physics (also referred to as HP or Radiation Protection) supplies, including personal radiological monitoring and protection equipment, are used by personnel performing work in radiological areas of the plant. Beginning in 2018, SDS will assume responsibility for the radiation protection program. SCE will resume responsibility after the D&D work is performed. Minimal Health Physics supplies will be needed to support the ISFSI only staff as virtually all contaminated materials will have been removed from the site.
t.
Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Health Physics (also referred to as HP or Radiation Protection) supplies, including personal radiological monitoring and protection equipment, are used by personnel performing work in radiological areas of the plant. Beginning in 2018, SDS will assume responsibility for the radiation protection program. SCE will resume responsibility after the D&D work is performed. Minimal Health Physics supplies will be needed to support the ISFSI only staff as virtually all contaminated materials will have been removed from the site.
: u. Loading Spent Fuel And GTCC Waste To DOE Under the Standard Contract with the DOE, SCE is responsible for transferring canisters from the ISFSI and loading them into DOE shipping containers on-site. The estimate assumes the DOE will accept the loaded canisters and that a dry fuel transfer facility is not necessary.
: u. Loading Spent Fuel And GTCC Waste To DOE Under the Standard Contract with the DOE, SCE is responsible for transferring canisters from the ISFSI and loading them into DOE shipping containers on-site. The estimate assumes the DOE will accept the loaded canisters and that a dry fuel transfer facility is not necessary.
The DOE will take title to the waste after it is loaded onto the DOEs transport device and the carrier signs for the shipment at the plant site. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, DOE loading costs are assumed to equal approximately 50% of the costs to load and transfer the spent fuel to the ISFSI. The timing of the DOE loading costs is based on the assumed Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule (Appendix A).
The DOE will take title to the waste after it is loaded onto the DOEs transport device and the carrier signs for the shipment at the plant site. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, DOE loading costs are assumed to equal approximately 50% of the costs to load and transfer the spent fuel to the ISFSI. The timing of the DOE loading costs is based on the assumed Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule (Appendix A).  
39
%
                                                  %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 40 3.
: 3.     Service Level Agreements For Administrative & General Expenses The 2014 DCE included 5% on all estimated costs to account for SCEs administrative and general (A&G) expenses supporting the SONGS decommissioning project. Beginning in 2016, SCE started to develop Service Level Agreements (SLAs) between the SONGS Participants and the SCE departments that support SONGS decommissioning. The SLAs are intended to provide additional transparency with respect to types of costs and level of support needed. There are separate SLAs for each SCE department supporting SONGS (e.g., Human Resources, IT, Legal, CPUC Regulatory Affairs). Beginning in 2029, after Period 4 is completed, corporate support functions are estimated in the A&G line item in lieu of separate SLAs, and is calculated as 5% of all other 2029-2051 estimated costs. The table below summarizes the SLAs and their associated estimated costs.
Service Level Agreements For Administrative & General Expenses The 2014 DCE included 5% on all estimated costs to account for SCEs administrative and general (A&G) expenses supporting the SONGS decommissioning project. Beginning in 2016, SCE started to develop Service Level Agreements (SLAs) between the SONGS Participants and the SCE departments that support SONGS decommissioning. The SLAs are intended to provide additional transparency with respect to types of costs and level of support needed. There are separate SLAs for each SCE department supporting SONGS (e.g., Human Resources, IT, Legal, CPUC Regulatory Affairs). Beginning in 2029, after Period 4 is completed, corporate support functions are estimated in the A&G line item in lieu of separate SLAs, and is calculated as 5% of all other 2029-2051 estimated costs. The table below summarizes the SLAs and their associated estimated costs.
TABLE 14 SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (A&G) COST ESTIMATE
TABLE 14 SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (A&G) COST ESTIMATE
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN THOUSANDS) 4.
Estimate To    Estimate To Recorded       Complete        Complete      Total Estimate  Total Estimate Through 2016     2017 - 2028    2029 - 2051    At Completion  At Completion Description              (Nominal $)       (2017$)         (2017$)     (Nominal /2017$)   (2014$)
DGC Staffing Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)
1 Service Level Agreements (A&G) 2 Audit Services                     $            - $        9,893 $            -  $        9,893 $        9,404 3 Controllers                                       -          12,193               -          12,193         11,587 4 Corporate Communications                       228           1,933               -            2,161           2,043 5 Corporate Security                               -          2,878               -            2,878           2,754 6 CPUC Regulatory Affairs                           -          10,982               -          10,982         10,444 7 Decommissioning Finance                     1,128             718               -            1,846           1,760 8 Environmental Policy                             -          1,833               -            1,833           1,726 9 Environmental Services                         107           2,243               -            2,349           2,211 10 Human Resources                                   -          8,005               -            8,005           7,588 11 Information Governance                           -          1,092               -            1,092           1,033 12 Information Technology                       7,037           24,820               -          31,857         30,461 13 Legal                                             -          10,883               -          10,883         10,226 14 Local Public Affairs                             -            764               -              764             719 15 Real Properties                               247             659               -              906             856 16 Risk Management                                   -            300               -              300             283 17 Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP)                 -          6,050               -            6,050           5,684 18 Supply Management                           1,375           9,341               -          10,716         10,147 19 Tax                                               -          1,874               -            1,874           1,787 20 Transportation Services                       525           4,989               -            5,514           5,308 21 Treasurers                                       -          3,672               -            3,672           3,461 22 A&G (2029 - 2051)                                 -              -          51,874           51,874         48,732 23 Service Level Agreements (A&G) Total $      10,647 $      115,122 $        51,874 $      177,643 $      168,212
Estimate To Complete 2017 - 2028 (2017$)
: 4.      DGC Staffing 40
Estimate To Complete 2029 - 2051 (2017$)
                                                          %
Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)
1 Service Level Agreements (A&G) 2 Audit Services 9,893 9,893 9,404 3
Controllers 12,193 12,193 11,587 4
Corporate Communications 228 1,933 2,161 2,043 5
Corporate Security 2,878 2,878 2,754 6
CPUC Regulatory Affairs 10,982 10,982 10,444 7
Decommissioning Finance 1,128 718 1,846 1,760 8
Environmental Policy 1,833 1,833 1,726 9
Environmental Services 107 2,243 2,349 2,211 10 Human Resources 8,005 8,005 7,588 11 Information Governance 1,092 1,092 1,033 12 Information Technology 7,037 24,820 31,857 30,461 13 Legal 10,883 10,883 10,226 14 Local Public Affairs 764 764 719 15 Real Properties 247 659 906 856 16 Risk Management 300 300 283 17 Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP) 6,050 6,050 5,684 18 Supply Management 1,375 9,341 10,716 10,147 19 Tax 1,874 1,874 1,787 20 Transportation Services 525 4,989 5,514 5,308 21 Treasurers 3,672 3,672 3,461 22 A&G (2029 - 2051) 51,874 51,874 48,732 23 Service Level Agreements (A&G) Total 10,647 115,122 51,874 177,643 168,212
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate F.       2017 DCE Costs By NRC Cost Category SONGS distributed projects are classified into one of the following three NRC cost categories: (1) License Termination (LT); (2) Spent Fuel Management (SNF); and (3) Site Restoration (SR). License Termination activities are those required to decontaminate the site and reduce residual radioactivity in order to terminate the NRC licenses pursuant to 10 C.F.R § 50.75(c). License termination activities are expected to be completed in 2028, following the SDS D&D work, and NRC approval of the partial site release.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 41 F.
2017 DCE Costs By NRC Cost Category SONGS distributed projects are classified into one of the following three NRC cost categories: (1) License Termination (LT); (2) Spent Fuel Management (SNF); and (3) Site Restoration (SR). License Termination activities are those required to decontaminate the site and reduce residual radioactivity in order to terminate the NRC licenses pursuant to 10 C.F.R § 50.75(c). License termination activities are expected to be completed in 2028, following the SDS D&D work, and NRC approval of the partial site release.
Spent Fuel Management activities are those required to operate and maintain the on-site spent fuel storage facilities until such time the spent fuel is removed by the DOE, in accordance with 10 C.F.R § 50.54(bb). The decommissioning of the ISFSI after the spent fuel is transferred offsite (10 C.F.R § 72.30) is also classified as a Spent Fuel Management activity.
Spent Fuel Management activities are those required to operate and maintain the on-site spent fuel storage facilities until such time the spent fuel is removed by the DOE, in accordance with 10 C.F.R § 50.54(bb). The decommissioning of the ISFSI after the spent fuel is transferred offsite (10 C.F.R § 72.30) is also classified as a Spent Fuel Management activity.
The remaining distributed costs are classified as Site Restoration costs, which are primarily driven by the terms of the easement and lease agreements with the Navy and CSLC.
The remaining distributed costs are classified as Site Restoration costs, which are primarily driven by the terms of the easement and lease agreements with the Navy and CSLC.
Line 859: Line 1,357:
The classification of distributed projects in this DCE to NRC cost categories is generally consistent with how projects were classified in the 2014 DCE.
The classification of distributed projects in this DCE to NRC cost categories is generally consistent with how projects were classified in the 2014 DCE.
Undistributed costs are also assigned to NRC cost categories. Certain undistributed cost items are assignable to a single NRC cost category (e.g., 100% of the annual cost to load spent fuel to the DOE is classified as Spent Fuel Management). However, given their nature, there are many other undistributed cost items which support multiple decommissioning activities (e.g.,
Undistributed costs are also assigned to NRC cost categories. Certain undistributed cost items are assignable to a single NRC cost category (e.g., 100% of the annual cost to load spent fuel to the DOE is classified as Spent Fuel Management). However, given their nature, there are many other undistributed cost items which support multiple decommissioning activities (e.g.,
energy costs). These undistributed costs are allocated to License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration based on the distributed cost amounts in each NRC cost category. 46 The table below summarizes the 2017 DCE costs by NRC cost category.
energy costs). These undistributed costs are allocated to License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration based on the distributed cost amounts in each NRC cost category.46 The table below summarizes the 2017 DCE costs by NRC cost category.
46 The undistributed costs incurred to date were recorded to each NRC cost category based on the allocation percentages assumed in the 2014 DCE.
46 The undistributed costs incurred to date were recorded to each NRC cost category based on the allocation percentages assumed in the 2014 DCE.  
41
%
                                                        %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 15 2017 DCE BY NRC COST CATEGORY
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 42 TABLE 15 2017 DCE BY NRC COST CATEGORY
($ IN THOUSANDS)
($ IN THOUSANDS)
Recorded        Estimate To    Total Estimate  Total Estimate Through 2016        Complete      At Completion    At Completion Description            (Nominal $)        (2017$)    (Nominal /2017$)      (2014$)
G.
1  License Termination 2  Distributed                                                                          $
Contingency Contingency is used in cost estimates to account for the costs of unplanned events and circumstances that often occur during the performance of a project. As defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers Project and Cost Engineers Handbook, contingency is an amount added to an estimate to allow for items, conditions, or events for which the state, occurrence, or effect is uncertain and that experience shows will likely result, in aggregate, in additional costs.
3  Undistributed 4  License Termination Subtotal                                                          $      1,906,728 5
6  Spent Fuel Management 7  Distributed                                                                          $
8  Undistributed 9  Spent Fuel Management Subtotal                                                        $      1,367,361 10 11  Site Restoration 12  Distributed 13  Undistributed 14  Site Restoration Subtotal        $      166,324    $    1,098,532  $      1,264,856 $      1,204,476 15 16  Total                                                                                $      4,478,566 G.       Contingency Contingency is used in cost estimates to account for the costs of unplanned events and circumstances that often occur during the performance of a project. As defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers Project and Cost Engineers Handbook, contingency is an amount added to an estimate to allow for items, conditions, or events for which the state, occurrence, or effect is uncertain and that experience shows will likely result, in aggregate, in additional costs.
Examples of costs intended to be covered by contingency include planning and estimating errors and omissions, design development and changes within scope, minor price fluctuations, and variations in the market and environmental conditions. Contingency is not intended to cover all unknowns or unplanned occurrences. For example, contingency usually excludes major scope changes, extraordinary events such as strikes and natural disasters, specified management reserves for defined issues, and general price escalation or currency effects.
Examples of costs intended to be covered by contingency include planning and estimating errors and omissions, design development and changes within scope, minor price fluctuations, and variations in the market and environmental conditions. Contingency is not intended to cover all unknowns or unplanned occurrences. For example, contingency usually excludes major scope changes, extraordinary events such as strikes and natural disasters, specified management reserves for defined issues, and general price escalation or currency effects.
The consensus in industry literature is that a primary consideration in determining appropriate amounts for contingency on a particular project is the stage of development and level of confidence in the estimated known base project costs. The 2014 DCE used a 25%
The consensus in industry literature is that a primary consideration in determining appropriate amounts for contingency on a particular project is the stage of development and level of confidence in the estimated known base project costs. The 2014 DCE used a 25%
42
Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)
                                                    %
Estimate To Complete (2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)
Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)
1 License Termination 2
Distributed 3
Undistributed 4
License Termination Subtotal 1,906,728 5
6 Spent Fuel Management 7
Distributed 8
Undistributed 9
Spent Fuel Management Subtotal 1,367,361 10 11 Site Restoration 12 Distributed 13 Undistributed 14 Site Restoration Subtotal 166,324 1,098,532 1,264,856 1,204,476 15 16 Total 4,478,566
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate contingency factor, 47 which was deemed reasonable by the CPUC in D.16-04-019 given the then-existing level of uncertainty in the then-current DCE. 48 Given the current stage of decommissioning, a lower contingency factor is warranted in some areas. Kenrich and knowledgeable SCE personnel reviewed each major category of costs and determined an individual contingency factor for each group. In determining the contingency factors for each cost grouping, consideration was given to contracting status (e.g., ISFSI and D&D work are under contract), technical complexity, estimating approach, and other variables.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 43 contingency factor,47 which was deemed reasonable by the CPUC in D.16-04-019 given the then-existing level of uncertainty in the then-current DCE.48 Given the current stage of decommissioning, a lower contingency factor is warranted in some areas. Kenrich and knowledgeable SCE personnel reviewed each major category of costs and determined an individual contingency factor for each group. In determining the contingency factors for each cost grouping, consideration was given to contracting status (e.g., ISFSI and D&D work are under contract), technical complexity, estimating approach, and other variables.
The remaining work associated with ISFSI is primarily the loading and transfer of spent fuel canisters to the ISFSI. The associated contingency factor reflects that this work is under contract and benefits from significant learning and industry experience over many decades. The D&D work is also under contract, following a rigorous competitive procurement process.
The remaining work associated with ISFSI is primarily the loading and transfer of spent fuel canisters to the ISFSI. The associated contingency factor reflects that this work is under contract and benefits from significant learning and industry experience over many decades. The D&D work is also under contract, following a rigorous competitive procurement process.
However, the contingency factor for this work also accounts for the significant influence of site-specific factors on D&D work. For other distributed work, not currently under contract and planned to occur in the relative distant future, the same 25% contingency factor used in the 2014 DCE was used in this DCE. With regard to undistributed labor and non-labor costs, the associated contingency factors account for a significantly more rigorous process used to develop the estimates contained in this DCE. In contrast to the 2014 DCE, the estimated headcount and non-labor costs for each division were subject to more substantial and iterative internal review and updating processes.
However, the contingency factor for this work also accounts for the significant influence of site-specific factors on D&D work. For other distributed work, not currently under contract and planned to occur in the relative distant future, the same 25% contingency factor used in the 2014 DCE was used in this DCE. With regard to undistributed labor and non-labor costs, the associated contingency factors account for a significantly more rigorous process used to develop the estimates contained in this DCE. In contrast to the 2014 DCE, the estimated headcount and non-labor costs for each division were subject to more substantial and iterative internal review and updating processes.
Line 882: Line 1,387:
47 Contingency of 25% was applied to all costs in the 2014 DCE with the following exceptions: 2013 and 2014 Actual Expenditures 0%; Department of Navy Easement Payments 15%; Hazardous and Asbestos Wastes 50%; Site Characterization Surveys 15%; Temporary Facilities 15%; Backfill and Compaction 15%.
47 Contingency of 25% was applied to all costs in the 2014 DCE with the following exceptions: 2013 and 2014 Actual Expenditures 0%; Department of Navy Easement Payments 15%; Hazardous and Asbestos Wastes 50%; Site Characterization Surveys 15%; Temporary Facilities 15%; Backfill and Compaction 15%.
48 Specifically referring to SONGS in its 2012 NDCTP decision, the CPUC stated, [t]he Commission finds the reasonableness of a contingency amount is significantly related to the stage of decommissioning and the activities projected, including particular site-specific challenges. Consequently, the reasonable contingency factor may vary between nuclear plants and at different stages of decommissioning. (D.14-12-082 at 38). Further, in its April 20, 2017 proposed decision pertaining to PG&Es updated cost estimates for the decommissioning of its two nuclear power plants, the CPUC specifically noted that PG&E use of a 25% contingency factor for Diablo Canyon raised questions in light of other information which had been supplied by PG&Es third-party decommissioning cost consultant, TLG Services, Incorporated (TLG). Specially, TLG estimated contingency on a line item basis and the resulting composite contingency factor was 17.4%.
48 Specifically referring to SONGS in its 2012 NDCTP decision, the CPUC stated, [t]he Commission finds the reasonableness of a contingency amount is significantly related to the stage of decommissioning and the activities projected, including particular site-specific challenges. Consequently, the reasonable contingency factor may vary between nuclear plants and at different stages of decommissioning. (D.14-12-082 at 38). Further, in its April 20, 2017 proposed decision pertaining to PG&Es updated cost estimates for the decommissioning of its two nuclear power plants, the CPUC specifically noted that PG&E use of a 25% contingency factor for Diablo Canyon raised questions in light of other information which had been supplied by PG&Es third-party decommissioning cost consultant, TLG Services, Incorporated (TLG). Specially, TLG estimated contingency on a line item basis and the resulting composite contingency factor was 17.4%.
43
%
                                                          %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate TABLE 16 CONTINGENCY FACTORS APPLIED IN 2017 DCE Contingency 2017 DCE Category                           Factor Recorded Costs Through September 2017                         0%
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 44 TABLE 16 CONTINGENCY FACTORS APPLIED IN 2017 DCE 2017 DCE Category Contingency Factor Recorded Costs Through September 2017 0%
ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Substructure Removal                                         25%
ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Substructure Removal 25%
Other Projects                                             15-25%
Other Projects 15-25%
Offshore Conduit Removal                                     25%
Offshore Conduit Removal 25%
ISFSI Demolition                                             25%
ISFSI Demolition 25%
Final Site Restoration                                       25%
Final Site Restoration 25%
Undistributed Labor                                         10%
Undistributed Labor 10%
Undistributed Non-Labor                                     15%
Undistributed Non-Labor 15%
Service Level Agreements                                     10%
Service Level Agreements 10%
The composite contingency factor included in the 2017 DCE is approximately                     percent of base estimated costs.
The composite contingency factor included in the 2017 DCE is approximately percent of base estimated costs.
TABLE 17 CONTINGENCY INCLUDED IN THE SONGS 2&3 2017 DCE
TABLE 17 CONTINGENCY INCLUDED IN THE SONGS 2&3 2017 DCE
($ IN THOUSANDS) 2017 DCE          2017 DCE Description              (Nominal /2017$)        (2014$)
($ IN THOUSANDS)
1    Base Estimated Costs 2    Estimated Contingency 3 Subtotal Estimated Costs            $      3,518,663    $      3,322,641 4    Recorded Costs                          1,183,601          1,155,925 5 Total DCE Value                    $      4,702,264    $      4,478,566 VI.     Additional Discussion Regarding The Project Schedule The SONGS decommissioning project schedule defines the sequence and timing of activities, the completion dates for major project milestones, and the duration of each decommissioning period. The 2017 DCE is presented in 2017 dollars. These constant dollars are spread over the duration of the SONGS entire decommissioning project based on the 2017 DCE project schedule. 49 In accordance with the contract, SDS has developed a baseline schedule for completing its major D&D and achieving partial site release. SCE incorporated SDSs Baseline Schedule 49 To assess the adequacy of the amount of funds residing in the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust, the annual constant dollar cash flows are escalated and discounted to present value.
VI.
44
Additional Discussion Regarding The Project Schedule The SONGS decommissioning project schedule defines the sequence and timing of activities, the completion dates for major project milestones, and the duration of each decommissioning period. The 2017 DCE is presented in 2017 dollars. These constant dollars are spread over the duration of the SONGS entire decommissioning project based on the 2017 DCE project schedule.49 In accordance with the contract, SDS has developed a baseline schedule for completing its major D&D and achieving partial site release. SCE incorporated SDSs Baseline Schedule 49 To assess the adequacy of the amount of funds residing in the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust, the annual constant dollar cash flows are escalated and discounted to present value.
                                                        %
Description 2017 DCE (Nominal /2017$)
2017 DCE (2014$)
1 Base Estimated Costs 2
Estimated Contingency 3
Subtotal Estimated Costs 3,518,663 3,322,641 4
Recorded Costs 1,183,601 1,155,925 5
Total DCE Value 4,702,264 4,478,566
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate into the overall decommissioning project schedule on which the 2017 DCE is based. The completion dates were mapped to corresponding 2017 DCE milestones.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 45 into the overall decommissioning project schedule on which the 2017 DCE is based. The completion dates were mapped to corresponding 2017 DCE milestones.
As described earlier, the decommissioning schedule is comprised of seven (7) periods.
As described earlier, the decommissioning schedule is comprised of seven (7) periods.
Each period is generally defined by the major focus of activity on-site, as well as the licensing status of the plant (i.e., from an NRC perspective). SONGS is currently planning and preparing for the physical decommissioning of the plant facilities (Periods 1 and 2). The major D&D work is expected to begin in 2019 and estimated to be completed by late 2028 (Periods 3 and 4). At the conclusion of the major D&D work, all structures, systems, and components on-site will have been removed to at least 3 feet below grade and the NRC Part 50 license will have been reduced to the ISFSI area only.
Each period is generally defined by the major focus of activity on-site, as well as the licensing status of the plant (i.e., from an NRC perspective). SONGS is currently planning and preparing for the physical decommissioning of the plant facilities (Periods 1 and 2). The major D&D work is expected to begin in 2019 and estimated to be completed by late 2028 (Periods 3 and 4). At the conclusion of the major D&D work, all structures, systems, and components on-site will have been removed to at least 3 feet below grade and the NRC Part 50 license will have been reduced to the ISFSI area only.
Line 910: Line 1,421:
SCE currently anticipates commencing spent fuel transfer operations in 2018 and is targeting completion in early to mid-2019. Fuel transfer operations are relatively complex, subject to extensive regulatory oversight, and intended to be performed 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Accordingly, for purposes of this DCE, SCE included schedule margin in its determination of the June 1, 2019 milestone completion date.
SCE currently anticipates commencing spent fuel transfer operations in 2018 and is targeting completion in early to mid-2019. Fuel transfer operations are relatively complex, subject to extensive regulatory oversight, and intended to be performed 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Accordingly, for purposes of this DCE, SCE included schedule margin in its determination of the June 1, 2019 milestone completion date.
The critical activities driving the overall duration of major D&D work are the removal of the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) equipment (e.g., reactor vessels, steam generators, reactor coolant pumps) from inside the containment buildings, and then the decontamination, demolition, and removal of the containment buildings. The decontamination, demolition, and removal of other SONGS buildings and facilities will be performed concurrently.
The critical activities driving the overall duration of major D&D work are the removal of the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) equipment (e.g., reactor vessels, steam generators, reactor coolant pumps) from inside the containment buildings, and then the decontamination, demolition, and removal of the containment buildings. The decontamination, demolition, and removal of other SONGS buildings and facilities will be performed concurrently.
SCE and SDS are continuing to plan and schedule major D&D work. Currently, SDS intends to complete the physical decommissioning work in 2025 and obtain final NRC approval of the final site survey and partial site release in 2026. SDSs schedule is currently based on performing the preparation and segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and NSSS large component removal at both Units 2 and 3 in parallel. These activities include relatively high-risk 45
SCE and SDS are continuing to plan and schedule major D&D work. Currently, SDS intends to complete the physical decommissioning work in 2025 and obtain final NRC approval of the final site survey and partial site release in 2026. SDSs schedule is currently based on performing the preparation and segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and NSSS large component removal at both Units 2 and 3 in parallel. These activities include relatively high-risk  
                                                    %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate cutting and material handling operations. As another example of uncertainty that is currently inherent in the major D&D schedule, SCE is currently planning for increased radiological decontamination efforts associated with the below-grade structures that will remain at SONGS after SDS completes its work. Accordingly, for purposes of this DCE, SCE has included schedule margin in its determination of the planned completion date of major D&D in late 2028. 50 VII. Waste Disposal The disposition of waste is a significant activity in the decommissioning of SONGS. A brief description of the waste to be generated from the SONGS decommissioning process is described below. In addition, the estimated quantity of each type of waste is summarized in Table 18 below.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 46 cutting and material handling operations. As another example of uncertainty that is currently inherent in the major D&D schedule, SCE is currently planning for increased radiological decontamination efforts associated with the below-grade structures that will remain at SONGS after SDS completes its work. Accordingly, for purposes of this DCE, SCE has included schedule margin in its determination of the planned completion date of major D&D in late 2028.50 VII.
Waste Disposal The disposition of waste is a significant activity in the decommissioning of SONGS. A brief description of the waste to be generated from the SONGS decommissioning process is described below. In addition, the estimated quantity of each type of waste is summarized in Table 18 below.
Spent Nuclear Fuel - Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the DOE is responsible for the removal and permanent disposal of all SONGS spent nuclear fuel. In the 2014 DCE, SCE assumed the DOE would begin accepting spent fuel from domestic commercial nuclear power plants in 2024 at the rate published in DOEs July 2004 Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report. Due to DOE inactivity in the past four years, SCE revised its spent fuel shipping schedule for the 2017 DCE to assume that the DOE will begin accepting spent fuel from the nuclear industry in 2028.
Spent Nuclear Fuel - Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the DOE is responsible for the removal and permanent disposal of all SONGS spent nuclear fuel. In the 2014 DCE, SCE assumed the DOE would begin accepting spent fuel from domestic commercial nuclear power plants in 2024 at the rate published in DOEs July 2004 Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report. Due to DOE inactivity in the past four years, SCE revised its spent fuel shipping schedule for the 2017 DCE to assume that the DOE will begin accepting spent fuel from the nuclear industry in 2028.
GTCC Waste - GTCC waste will be generated when SDS segments the reactor vessel internals. Additional GTCC waste may reside in the spent fuel pools. GTCC waste cannot be disposed of in a federally licensed low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal facility. As explained above, courts have held that the DOE must accept GTCC waste, but currently there is no disposal facility in the U.S. that is licensed to accept it. Therefore, GTCC waste will be packaged and stored in licensed canisters on the SONGS ISFSI until final disposal.
GTCC Waste - GTCC waste will be generated when SDS segments the reactor vessel internals. Additional GTCC waste may reside in the spent fuel pools. GTCC waste cannot be disposed of in a federally licensed low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal facility. As explained above, courts have held that the DOE must accept GTCC waste, but currently there is no disposal facility in the U.S. that is licensed to accept it. Therefore, GTCC waste will be packaged and stored in licensed canisters on the SONGS ISFSI until final disposal.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) - 10 C.F.R. § 61 outlines the requirements for LLRW and identifies the criteria for the classifications of waste materials that can be accepted at federally licensed LLRW disposal facilities. SDS will characterize, package, and transport offsite the Class A, Class B, and Class C waste.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) - 10 C.F.R. § 61 outlines the requirements for LLRW and identifies the criteria for the classifications of waste materials that can be accepted at federally licensed LLRW disposal facilities. SDS will characterize, package, and transport offsite the Class A, Class B, and Class C waste.
Exempt Waste - It is assumed that some waste generated during the decommissioning of SONGS will receive NRC approval to be disposed of at a facility that accepts very low-level waste. According to the NRC, 10 CFR 20.2002 is available for use by licensees for wastes that typically are a small fraction of the Class A limits contained in Part 61, and for which the extensive controls in Part 61 are not needed to ensure protection of public health and safety and the environment. Thus, 10 CFR 20.2002 provides an alternative, safe, risk-informed disposal 50 The 2028 date is generally consistent with the schedule that was assumed in the 2014 DCE.
Exempt Waste - It is assumed that some waste generated during the decommissioning of SONGS will receive NRC approval to be disposed of at a facility that accepts very low-level waste. According to the NRC, 10 CFR 20.2002 is available for use by licensees for wastes that typically are a small fraction of the Class A limits contained in Part 61, and for which the extensive controls in Part 61 are not needed to ensure protection of public health and safety and the environment. Thus, 10 CFR 20.2002 provides an alternative, safe, risk-informed disposal 50 The 2028 date is generally consistent with the schedule that was assumed in the 2014 DCE.  
46
%
                                                        %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate method for these materials, which are frequently called very low-level waste (VLLW), or low-activity waste (LAW). 51 Non-Radiologically Contaminated Waste - Radiologically clean concrete or debris will be disposed of at an out of state Class III landfill. This material will be scanned for radiological contamination prior to leaving SONGS to meet all applicable regulatory requirements. Non-contaminated reinforcing and structural steel may be recycled.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 47 method for these materials, which are frequently called very low-level waste (VLLW), or low-activity waste (LAW).51 Non-Radiologically Contaminated Waste - Radiologically clean concrete or debris will be disposed of at an out of state Class III landfill. This material will be scanned for radiological contamination prior to leaving SONGS to meet all applicable regulatory requirements. Non-contaminated reinforcing and structural steel may be recycled.
Non-Radiologically Contaminated Hazardous and Industrial Waste Disposal - Lead shielding and other hazardous materials and chemicals will be removed and properly disposed of during decommissioning. Non-Radioactive contaminated surfaces coated with tightly adhering and undamaged lead-based paint will be removed as non-hazardous building demolition debris.
Non-Radiologically Contaminated Hazardous and Industrial Waste Disposal - Lead shielding and other hazardous materials and chemicals will be removed and properly disposed of during decommissioning. Non-Radioactive contaminated surfaces coated with tightly adhering and undamaged lead-based paint will be removed as non-hazardous building demolition debris.
Table 18 summarizes the estimated waste disposal quantities by class for the remainder of SONGS decommissioning.
Table 18 summarizes the estimated waste disposal quantities by class for the remainder of SONGS decommissioning.
TABLE 18 REMAINING WASTE DISPOSAL QUANTITIES Period 2   Periods 3 & 4   Period 5   Period 6       Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
TABLE 18 REMAINING WASTE DISPOSAL QUANTITIES 51 Low-Level Waste Disposal Under 10 C.F.R. § 20.2002. U.S. NRC, 21 September 2017, https://www.nrc.gov/waste/llw-disposal/10cfr20-2002-info.html, accessed December 1, 2017.
Transition and                            Civil Works    Final Site Pool Storage      D&D        Dry Storage  Project      Restoration     Total Description                (lbs)         (lbs)        (lbs)        (lbs)          (lbs)        (lbs) 1 Start                             1/1/2017       1/1/2019     1/1/2029     1/1/2046       1/1/2050 2 End                             12/31/2018   12/31/2028     12/31/2045 12/31/2049     12/31/2051 3 Duration (Years)                     2.0           10.0         17.0         4.0           2.0 4 Class B, C, GTCC 5 Class B                                   -          69,320           -            -            -            69,320 6 Class C                                 5,700             inc         -            -            -            5,700 7 GTCC                                     -          222,800           -            -            -          222,800 8   Class B, C, GTCC Subtotal             5,700       292,120         -              -            -        297,820 9 Class A 10 Class A                                   -    395,096,463           -              -        502,383   395,598,846 11 Class A - Containerized Waste           7,950             inc         -            -            -            7,950 12   Class A Subtotal                     7,950   395,096,463           -              -        502,383   395,606,796 13 Other 14 Out of State Landfill / Exempt           -    489,594,000           -  1,074,296,250   394,648,923 1,958,539,173 15 Scrap Metal Recycler                     -    105,391,000           -      71,736,000   10,325,800   187,452,800 16   Other Subtotal                         -    594,985,000           -  1,146,032,250   404,974,723 2,145,991,973 17 18 Waste Total                             13,650   990,373,583           -  1,146,032,250   405,477,106 2,541,896,589 51 Low-Level Waste Disposal Under 10 C.F.R. § 20.2002. U.S. NRC, 21 September 2017, https://www.nrc.gov/waste/llw-disposal/10cfr20-2002-info.html, accessed December 1, 2017.
Description Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (lbs)
47
Periods 3 & 4 D&D (lbs)
                                                            %
Period 5 Dry Storage (lbs)
Period 6 Civil Works Project (lbs)
Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &
Final Site Restoration (lbs)
Total (lbs) 1 Start 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2
End 12/31/2018 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3
Duration (Years) 2.0 10.0 17.0 4.0 2.0 4
Class B, C, GTCC 5
Class B 69,320 69,320 6
Class C 5,700 inc 5,700 7
GTCC 222,800 222,800 8
Class B, C, GTCC Subtotal 5,700 292,120 297,820 9
Class A 10 Class A 395,096,463 502,383 395,598,846 11 Class A - Containerized Waste 7,950 inc 7,950 12 Class A Subtotal 7,950 395,096,463 502,383 395,606,796 13 Other 14 Out of State Landfill / Exempt 489,594,000 1,074,296,250 394,648,923 1,958,539,173 15 Scrap Metal Recycler 105,391,000 71,736,000 10,325,800 187,452,800 16 Other Subtotal 594,985,000 1,146,032,250 404,974,723 2,145,991,973 17 18 Waste Total 13,650 990,373,583 1,146,032,250 405,477,106 2,541,896,589
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate VIII. References
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 48 VIII.
References
: 1. EnergySolutions, 2014 Decommissioning Cost Analysis of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3, September 5, 2014
: 1. EnergySolutions, 2014 Decommissioning Cost Analysis of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3, September 5, 2014
: 2. August 20, 2015 letter from NRC to SCE Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Mr.
: 2. {{letter dated|date=August 20, 2015|text=August 20, 2015 letter}} from NRC to SCE Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Mr.
Thomas J. Palmisano (ADAM Accession No.: ML15204A383)
Thomas J. Palmisano (ADAM Accession No.: ML15204A383)
: 3. Application 14-12-007 Joint Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) And San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) For 2014 SONGS Units 2&3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate And Related Decommissioning Issues, December 10, 2014
: 3. Application 14-12-007 Joint Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) And San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) For 2014 SONGS Units 2&3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate And Related Decommissioning Issues, December 10, 2014
Line 939: Line 1,464:
: 7. State of California, Executive Order D-62-02, September 2002
: 7. State of California, Executive Order D-62-02, September 2002
: 8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors, Regulatory Guide 1.202, February 2005
: 8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors, Regulatory Guide 1.202, February 2005
: 9. California Public Utilities Commission Proposed Decision A.16-03-006, Decision Approving Decommissioning Cost Estimate, April 20, 2017 48
: 9. California Public Utilities Commission Proposed Decision A.16-03-006, Decision Approving Decommissioning Cost Estimate, April 20, 2017
                                            %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix $
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix $
Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule
Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule  
                                            %
%


SONGS Units 1, 2, and 3 Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule 2028 DOE Acceptance (as of 1/2/2018)
SONGS Units 1, 2, and 3 Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule 2028 DOE Acceptance (as of 1/2/2018)
On-Site Inventory (Beginning of Year)                              On-Site Transfers (During Year)                    Off-Site Transfers (During Year)
Unit 1 Fuel Assemblies at Morris Unit 1 Fuel Assemblies in ISFSI Units 2 & 3 Fuel Assemblies in Pools Units 2 & 3 Fuel Assemblies in ISFSI Units 1, 2, & 3 Canisters in ISFSI*
Units 1, 2, & 3 Units 2 & 3 Fuel      Units 2 & 3        Unit 1          Unit 2            Unit 3      Canisters Unit 1 Fuel       Unit 1 Fuel Units 2 & 3 Fuel Units 2 & 3 Fuel Units 1, 2, & 3           Assemblies          Canisters       Assemblies    Assemblies        Assemblies    Transferred Assemblies at    Assemblies in Assemblies in Assemblies in              Canisters in    Transferred to     Transferred to   Transferred to Transferred to   Transferred to from ISFSI to Morris            ISFSI            Pools          ISFSI              ISFSI*              ISFSI              ISFSI            DOE          DOE**             DOE**           DOE*
Units 2 & 3 Fuel Assemblies Transferred to ISFSI Units 2 & 3 Canisters Transferred to ISFSI Unit 1 Assemblies Transferred to DOE Unit 2 Assemblies Transferred to DOE**
2016                 270               395           2,668               792                 50                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
Unit 3 Assemblies Transferred to DOE**
2017                 270               395           2,668               792                 50                 -                                  -              -                -              -
Units 1, 2, & 3 Canisters Transferred from ISFSI to DOE*
2018                 270               395           2,668               792               110               2,220                 60           -              -                -              -
2016 270 395 2,668 792 50 2017 270 395 2,668 792 50 2018 270 395 2,668 792 110 2,220 60 2019 270 395 448 3,012 170 448 1
2019                 270               395             448             3,012               170                 448                 1           -              -                -              -
2020 270 395 3,460 182 2021 270 395 3,460 182 2022 270 395 3,460 182 2023 270 395 3,460 182 2024 270 395 3,460 182 2025 270 395 3,460 182 2026 270 395 3,460 182 2027 270 395 3,460 182 2028 270 395 3,460 182 96 4
2020                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2029 270 299 3,460 178 48 2
2021                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2030 270 251 3,460 176 120 5
2022                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2031 270 131 3,460 171 48 2
2023                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2032 270 83 3,460 169 48 2
2024                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2033 270 35 3,460 167 2034 270 35 3,460 167 35 48 48 6
2025                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2035 270 3,364 161 192 96 12 2036 270 3,076 149 120 168 12 2037 270 2,788 137 48 72 5
2026                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2038**
2027                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
270 2,668 132 74 111 5
2028                 270               395             -              3,460               182                 -                  -              96             -                -                4 2029                 270               299             -              3,460               178                 -                  -              48             -                -                2 2030                 270               251             -              3,460               176                 -                  -            120             -                -                5 2031                 270               131             -              3,460               171                 -                  -              48             -                -                2 2032                 270                 83             -              3,460               169                 -                  -              48             -                -                2 2033                 270                 35             -              3,460               167                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2039 270 2,483 127 111 111 6
2034                 270                 35             -              3,460               167                 -                  -              35             48               48               6 2035                 270               -              -              3,364               161                 -                  -              -              192               96             12 2036                 270               -              -              3,076               149                 -                  -              -              120               168             12 2037                 270               -              -              2,788               137                 -                  -              -                48               72               5 2038**               270               -              -              2,668               132                 -                  -              -                74             111               5 2039                 270               -              -              2,483               127                 -                  -              -              111               111               6 2040                 270               -              -              2,261               121                 -                  -              -              111               74               5 2041                 270               -              -              2,076               116                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2040 270 2,261 121 111 74 5
2042                 270               -              -              2,076               116                 -                  -              -              111               111               6 2043                 270               -              -              1,854               110                 -                  -              -                74             111               5 2044                 270               -              -              1,669               105                 -                  -              -              111               74               5 2045                 270               -              -              1,484               100                 -                  -              -              -                -              -
2041 270 2,076 116 2042 270 2,076 116 111 111 6
2046                 270               -              -              1,484               100                 -                  -              -              222               222             12 2047                 270               -              -              1,040                 88                 -                  -              -                74               74               4 2048                 270               -              -                892                 84                 -                  -              -              222               222             12 2049                 270               -              -                448                 72                 -                  -              -              208               240             13 2050***               270               -              -                  -                  59                 -                  -            270             -                -                13 2051                 -                  -              -                  -                -                  -                  -              -              -                -              -
2043 270 1,854 110 74 111 5
2044 270 1,669 105 111 74 5
2045 270 1,484 100 2046 270 1,484 100 222 222 12 2047 270 1,040 88 74 74 4
2048 270 892 84 222 222 12 2049 270 448 72 208 240 13 2050***
270 59 270 13 2051
* Excluding GTCC Waste
* Excluding GTCC Waste
** Before 2038, SONGS 2 & 3 fuel assemblies shipped in Areva 24-PTH canisters Beginning in 2038, SONGS 2 & 3 fuel assemblies shipped in Holtec MPC canisters
** Before 2038, SONGS 2 & 3 fuel assemblies shipped in Areva 24-PTH canisters Beginning in 2038, SONGS 2 & 3 fuel assemblies shipped in Holtec MPC canisters
*** Unit 1 fuel assemblies transferred to DOE from GE facility in Morris, Illinois in TADS (21 assemblies per TAD)
*** Unit 1 fuel assemblies transferred to DOE from GE facility in Morris, Illinois in TADS (21 assemblies per TAD)
                                                                                                      %
On-Site Transfers (During Year)
On-Site Inventory (Beginning of Year)
Off-Site Transfers (During Year)
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix %
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix %
Detailed Project Schedule
Detailed Project Schedule  
                                            %
%
 
^Ž&d
 
^KŽE'^ŽhŽŽ^WŽ
Ž^KE'^^^^
 
^Ž&d
 
Ž
&DŽ
Ž
W
^&
KŽ
 
>
^ZŽ
Ž
/ŽŽ

ŽŽ KŽ
^Ž
ŽŽ
Žh
^
W
Ž
ŽŽŽŽŽ
ŽŽŽŽŽ
ŽE^^^ZŽ
ŽE^^^ZŽŽ hhŽŽŽŽŽ
 
h/ŽŽ hKŽ
 
hKŽ
 
WŽŽŽ
 
Z
hd
ŽŽŽŽ
ZW
Ž
 
Z^ZŽ
 
ZŽ
 
ZŽ
 
dŽŽŽŽ hWŽ
 
h^ZŽ
 
hŽ hŽ
 
hd
hW
Ž
 
h^
ZŽ
 
hŽ hŽ
 
h^

/ŽŽ
 
KŽ
/ŽKŽ
^ZŽŽ
 
W
Ž
Ž
 
^ZŽ
 
ZŽ^
/Ž^
K
Ž h^

 
/ŽŽ
 
/ŽKŽ
^ZŽŽ
 
W
Ž
Ž
 
^ZŽ ZŽ^/Ž^
 
hhŽE^^^


                                                                                                                                  ^KŽE'^ŽhŽŽ^WŽ
hŽW hZs/^Ž hZs^
                                            Ž^KE'^^^^
                                                                                                                                                ŽE^^^ZŽŽ
                                                                    ŽE^^^ZŽ hhŽE^^^
hŽ                                      hŽW                         hZs/^Ž                                                 hZs^
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Ž
h>ŽŽZŽ
h>ŽŽZŽ
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ^
 
                                                                                                                      Ž,KŽ                                                                                                                      DŽŽ
hŽ
WŽWŽ^                                                                                                                    D
 
hZs^                                  WŽ
hŽW hZs/^Ž hZs^
hŽW                         hZs/^Ž hŽ Z
h>ŽŽZŽ
h>ŽŽZŽ
                                                                                                                                      hZŽWs                                                                                                   
 
                                                                                                                                                                          &'dKŽ
Ž,KŽ WŽWŽ^
  ^Ž&d                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ŽŽŽŽŽ
hŽ
        ^Ž&d
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ŽŽŽŽŽ
Ž
  ^&>Ž^
^
                                                  Ž
DŽŽ
                                                  &DŽ                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           ŽŽŽŽZ^^
D
                                                  Ž
WŽ
hhŽŽŽŽŽ
Z
                                  ŽŽ                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ^Ž>WŽ^ZŽ
ŽŽŽŽZ^^
                                                W                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       hŽ                                                                                                                                                                                      hŽ
^Ž>WŽ^ZŽ
                              ŽŽ                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      h/ŽŽ                                                                                                            hKŽ

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
ZŽŽ^,W
                                                  ^&                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Ž                                                                                                                                                                                            Ž KŽ                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  WŽŽ                                                                                                          ZŽŽ^,W
ŽZŽŽŽŽ
hŽŽ                          h/ŽŽ                                      hKŽ hŽŽ
^hŽŽ d
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ŽZŽŽŽŽ
DŽ
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ^hŽŽ
&
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      Ž
DŽ
                                                                                                                                                  ŽŽŽŽ

Z                                                            ZW                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          Z
 
                                                                                          Ž                                   Z^ZŽ                                                 ZŽ                                                         ZŽ ŽŽ
Ž
                                                                                                                                                                                                          /d                                                                                                                       ZŽd WŽŽŽ
hZŽWs
ŽŽ                                                                                                                                                                   ŽŽW                 ŽŽ ŽŽ ŽŽ                                    ŽŽ
h'Ž
                                                                                                                                                                                              Ž                ^ZŽ Ž                          Ž            ŽŽ dŽŽŽŽ                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               &^^

hWŽ               hŽ                                hŽ                                        hŽŽ                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  Ž&
&WŽŽd
hd
hDdŽ
h^ZŽ
KŽŽ
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ŽŽ hW h^                                                                                                                                                                                                       hŽ hd                                                                                                                        Ž ZŽ hŽ                                                                                                 hŽ                                                                                    Ž
E^^^
                                                                                                                                      ^ZŽŽ                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   /ŽKŽ h^                                                                                                    W                                                                                        ZŽ^                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Ž

                                                                                                                                                    ^ZŽ                            Ž                /Ž^                                                                                                                                                                  /ŽŽ                                   KŽ            Ž
t^
                                                                                             Ž
D
                                                                                                                                                                                        ^ZŽŽ                                                                                                                                                                           /ŽKŽ h^                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ŽŽŽd
<t&#x17d;
W                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   K            &#x17d;
/^
                                                                                                                                                        &#x17d;                 ^Z&#x17d;                                  &#x17d;                                                                                                  /&#x17d;&#x17d;                                                                              &#x17d;                &#x17d;                                                                                                    D
<<<
Z&#x17d;^/&#x17d;^                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          D
D&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            ^Z&#x17d;
&&&#x17d;
<^&#x17d;^
h'&#x17d;
<<K
hDd&#x17d;
KWzh
>d&#x17d;WEZ&#x17d;
DW&#x17d;
dd^&#x17d;
zh
Z^
^W
h'&#x17d;d
,D
&&#x17d;
&^^&#x17d;>d&#x17d;
h'&#x17d;d
^>
&#x17d;&#x17d;&#x17d;d
D
D
D&#x17d;&#x17d;Z^
D&#x17d;&#x17d;Z^
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      &#x17d;                                                                     /&#x17d;K&#x17d; hW&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               W         ^                            /&#x17d;                                                                    h&^^s^                K           &#x17d;
Z
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                &#x17d;       Z&#x17d;             &#x17d;                                                                                         W&#x17d;                 &#x17d;
&#x17d;&#x17d; h&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      &#x17d;                                                                                                                         &#x17d;
&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ^Z&#x17d;
&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              &#x17d;                                             /&#x17d;K&#x17d; hW&#x17d;
&#x17d;
W ^                                  /&#x17d;                                  h&^^s^         K         &#x17d;
&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            &#x17d;                                                         W&#x17d;           &#x17d;
&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          &#x17d; Z&#x17d;                                     &#x17d;                                                                                   &#x17d;
&^^
                                                                                                                                                                                  ^Z&#x17d;&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                               /&#x17d;K&#x17d; h&,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   h&^^s^                                                     &#x17d; W                                                                                                                                                                                                     /&#x17d;&#x17d;                                                   K&#x17d;
&#x17d;&
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        &,                                                        &#x17d;
&#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                    &#x17d;                   ^Z&#x17d;
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
/d Z&#x17d;d
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                &#x17d;
 
                                                                                                                                                                                  ^Z&#x17d;&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                 /&#x17d;K&#x17d; h&,                                                                                                                                             W                                                                                                                                                                     /&#x17d;                                                             h&^^s^          K         &#x17d;
D&#x17d;t&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                &#x17d;                       ^Z&#x17d;                                 &#x17d;                                                                                         &#x17d;                                                               &,             &#x17d;               &#x17d;


W&#x17d;
&#x17d;t&#x17d;W&#x17d; W>
W&#x17d;&#x17d;
t&#x17d;W&#x17d;
&'dK&#x17d; W
&#x17d; K
&#x17d;
 
h&^^s^
W&#x17d;
^Z&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
^
Z&#x17d;
 
/&#x17d;K&#x17d;
&#x17d;
/&#x17d;
&#x17d;
&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
hW&#x17d;

 
K&#x17d;
 
/&#x17d;K&#x17d;
 
h&^^s^
&,
h&,

^Z&#x17d;&#x17d; W
&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
^Z&#x17d;
 
W
&#x17d; K
&#x17d;
 
h&^^s^
W&#x17d;
^Z&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
^
Z&#x17d;
 
/&#x17d;K&#x17d;
&#x17d;
/&#x17d;
&#x17d;
&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
hW&#x17d;

^Z&#x17d;&#x17d;
 
W
&#x17d;
 
^Z&#x17d;
 
K
&#x17d;
/&#x17d;K&#x17d;
&#x17d;
/&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
h&^^s^
&,
&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
h&,


W>
h&#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    /                                                                                                                                                                    K
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     D&#x17d;t&#x17d;
h&#x17d;&#x17d; h/&#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
 
h&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
&#x17d;&#x17d;W
&#x17d;
 
&#x17d;&#x17d;
^Z&#x17d;
 
&#x17d;&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
&#x17d;&#x17d;
&#x17d;
 
&#x17d;&#x17d;
&#x17d;&#x17d;
 
&#x17d;&#x17d;
/&#x17d;&#x17d;
 
W >dW
W >dW
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    h'&#x17d;d
^>d&#x17d;W&#x17d;EZ
                                                                                                                                      Z&#x17d;hZ&#x17d;s&#x17d;^h                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              W&#x17d;&#x17d;
 
                                                                                                                                                                                          E^^^                                                                                    ^>d&#x17d;W&#x17d;EZ                                                                                                                       h'&#x17d;d                                                                                                                                          t&#x17d;W&#x17d;
EZZ&#x17d;>d&#x17d;W
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          EZZ&#x17d;>d&#x17d;W
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          dd^&#x17d;
>dW^>,^&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                
EZ&^^&#x17d;W&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      >d&#x17d;WEZ&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                            W&#x17d;
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                D
&^^W&#x17d; K
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      >dW^>,^&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             &#x17d;t&#x17d;W&#x17d;

                                                                                                                                                                                                      h'&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                &^^W&#x17d;
W&#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  &W&#x17d;&#x17d;d EZ&^^&#x17d;W&#x17d;                                                                                 >

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    K&#x17d;&#x17d;
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    t^                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          &^^&#x17d;>d&#x17d;
/
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ^
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                  D&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 W
&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    &&#x17d;                                                    &#x17d; d                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  ,D
&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                hDd&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      W&#x17d;
 
D&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                  <t&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Z^
h&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          ^Z&#x17d;
&#x17d; h&#x17d;&#x17d; W&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                &#x17d;

                                                                              &                                                                                                                                                <^&#x17d;^
W
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      KWzh                                                                                            W
D&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          <<K                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ^&#x17d;
 
D&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 DW&#x17d;                                                                                                                        K&#x17d;
^&>&#x17d;^
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <<<                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  D&#x17d;
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        h'&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 &#x17d;&#x17d;
&#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    zh
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              hDd&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    /&#x17d;&#x17d;
&#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    ^>                                                                                                                            
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            /^
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            &&&#x17d;                                                                                                                                                                  ^W                                                                                                                              &#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          &#x17d;h
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Z&#x17d;&#x17d;K^&#x17d;&#x17d;&#x17d;
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              %
Z/
Z/
Z&#x17d;&#x17d;K^&#x17d;&#x17d;&#x17d;
Z&#x17d;hZ&#x17d;s&#x17d;^h
%


                                                                                                  /RQJ5DQJH621*6'HFRPPLVVLRQLQJ6FKHGXOH

                                                                                                                                                                                                                              

                                                                                                                                                      

                                                                                                                                                  
/RQJ5DQJH621*6'HFRPPLVVLRQLQJ6FKHGXOH
3HULRG,QLWLDO$FWLYLWLHV

                      -XQH'HF


































&LYLO:RUNV5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDO 5)3  
2YHUVLJKW7HDP0RELOL]DWLRQ 
&LYLO:RUNV&RQWUDFWRU6HOHFWLRQ 
6LWH'HZDWHULQJ
6XEVWUXFWXUH5HPRYDO
3HUPDQHQW%DFNILOO
,6)6,'HPROLWLRQ $5(9$DQG+ROWHF
2FHDQ&RQGXLW5HPRYDO
 $OO8QLWIXHODW621*6LVH[SHFWHGWREHUHPRYHGIURPWKHVLWHE\\WKHHQGRI
6LWH9HJHWDWLRQ
 3HULRGDOVRLQFOXGHVWKHUHPRYDORI8QLWVXEVWUXFWXUHV
)LQDO/LFHQVH7HUPLQDWLRQ
 7KHVHDFWLYLWLHVRFFXUSULRUWR3HULRG
5HY,VVXHG
6HDZDOO:DONZD\\5HPRYDO
'HZDWHULQJ
,6)6,2QO\\7UDQVLWLRQ
3URJUDP7UDQVLWLRQ
&(4$3HUPLWWLQJ$SSURYDO
,6)6,3DG6HFXULW\\%XLOGLQJ&RPSOHWLRQ
3RROWR3DG&DPSDLJQ
3RROWR3DG&RPSOHWLRQ 3HULRG,QLWLDO$FWLYLWLHV
-XQH'HF
3HULRG7UDQVLWLRQDQG3RRO6WRUDJH
-DQ'HF
3HULRG' 'DQG'U\\6WRUDJH
-XQH'HF
3HULRG' 'DQG3RRO6WRUDJH
-DQ0D\\
3HULRG'U\\6WRUDJH
-DQ'HF
3HULRG&LYLO:RUNV3URMHFW
-DQ'HF
3HULRG,6)6,'HPROLWLRQ )LQDO6LWH5HVWRUDWLRQ
-DQ'HF
3UHSVIRU'HFRPPLVVLRQLQJ
1XFOHDU6WHDP6XSSO\\6\\VWHP 1666
/DUJH&RPSRQHQW5HPRYDO /&5
%XLOGLQJ'HFRQWDPLQDWLRQ
%XLOGLQJ'HPROLWLRQ
/LFHQVHG0DWHULDO5HPRYDO
3DUW/LFHQVH3DUWLDO6LWH5HOHDVH
7HPSRUDU\\%DFNILOO
'*&6HOHFWLRQ
'*&6HOHFWLRQ
)XHO&DQFHOODWLRQ
)XHO&DQFHOODWLRQ
3UHSVIRU'HFRPPLVVLRQLQJ 3HULRG7UDQVLWLRQDQG3RRO6WRUDJH

                                    -DQ'HF

                    3URJUDP7UDQVLWLRQ

                    &(4$3HUPLWWLQJ$SSURYDO

                    ,6)6,3DG6HFXULW\%XLOGLQJ&RPSOHWLRQ

                    3RROWR3DG&DPSDLJQ 3HULRG' 'DQG3RRO6WRUDJH

                                        -DQ0D\

                                  3RROWR3DG&RPSOHWLRQ
%
                                  ,6)6,2QO\7UDQVLWLRQ 3HULRG' 'DQG'U\6WRUDJH
                                                                                                      -XQH'HF
                                          1XFOHDU6WHDP6XSSO\6\VWHP 1666
                                          /DUJH&RPSRQHQW5HPRYDO /&5
                                          %XLOGLQJ'HFRQWDPLQDWLRQ
                                          %XLOGLQJ'HPROLWLRQ
                                          /LFHQVHG0DWHULDO5HPRYDO
                                          3DUW/LFHQVH3DUWLDO6LWH5HOHDVH
                                          7HPSRUDU\%DFNILOO 3HULRG'U\6WRUDJH
                                                                                -DQ'HF
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    'HZDWHULQJ 3HULRG&LYLO:RUNV3URMHFW
                                                                                                                                                                                -DQ'HF
                                                                                                                                                                                                      &LYLO:RUNV5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDO 5)3  
                                                                                                                                                                                                      2YHUVLJKW7HDP0RELOL]DWLRQ 
                                                                                                                                                                                                      6HDZDOO:DONZD\5HPRYDO
                                                                                                                                                                                                      &LYLO:RUNV&RQWUDFWRU6HOHFWLRQ 
                                                                                                                                                                                                      6LWH'HZDWHULQJ
                                                                                                                                                                                                      6XEVWUXFWXUH5HPRYDO
                                                                                                                                                                                                      3HUPDQHQW%DFNILOO 3HULRG,6)6,'HPROLWLRQ )LQDO6LWH5HVWRUDWLRQ
                                                                                                                                                                                                          -DQ'HF
                                                                                                                                                                                                      ,6)6,'HPROLWLRQ $5(9$DQG+ROWHF
                                                                                                                                                                                                      2FHDQ&RQGXLW5HPRYDO
         $OO8QLWIXHODW621*6LVH[SHFWHGWREHUHPRYHGIURPWKHVLWHE\WKHHQGRI                                                                                                        6LWH9HJHWDWLRQ
         3HULRGDOVRLQFOXGHVWKHUHPRYDORI8QLWVXEVWUXFWXUHV                                                                                                                                )LQDO/LFHQVH7HUPLQDWLRQ
         7KHVHDFWLYLWLHVRFFXUSULRUWR3HULRG
5HY,VVXHG
                                                                                                                              %


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix &
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix &
Detailed Cost Table
Detailed Cost Table  
                                            %
%


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                  Description                                                               Labor                 Material       Contract             Other           Disposal     Overheads       Contingency       Total 1 Completed Projects - 2015 NDCTP                                                                         $          1,223   $            2,671 $      89,834   $            (137) $            - $        1,563   $                - $      95,154 2
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 1
3 LT-2-D-2 18                       Planning & Design For Cold and Dark                                               1,888                 1,008         14,977               1,054               -          1,373                   -        20,299 4 LT-2-D-2 19                       Implement Cold and Dark (Repower Site)                                           2,151                   415         52,191                 (663)             -          1,522                   -        55,615 5 LT-2-D-2 20                       Install 12 kV Service Line to Power Temp Power Ring                               1,579                 2,779           4,746                 419             -            758                   -        10,281 6 LT-2-D-2 21                       Drain & De-Energize Non-Essential Systems (DEC Process)                           2,363                   946           1,299                   14             -          1,487                   -          6,111 7 LT-2-D-2 29                       Implement Control Room Modifications (Command Center Relocation)                       -                    4           340                     3             -                3                 -            350 8 Completed Activities - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal                                                 $          7,981 $              5,152 $        73,553 $                826 $            - $        5,143 $                -  $    92,655 9
Completed Projects - 2015 NDCTP 1,223 2,671 89,834 (137) 1,563 95,154 2
10 LT-2-D-2 26                       Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 2                               139                 2,814           1,159                   31             -            129                   -          4,271 11 LT-2-D-2 27                       Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 3                               139                 2,814           1,159                   31             -            129                   -          4,271 12 Completed Activities - Spent Fuel Islanding Subtotal                                                   $            277   $            5,627 $        2,317 $                63 $            - $          258 $                -  $      8,543 13 14 LT-2-D-2 07                       Prepare Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR)                                       1                   -            1,991                     8             -              21               -            2,021 15 Completed Activities - Phase 2 Regulatory Compliance Subtotal                                           $              1     $              -  $        1,991 $                  8 $          - $            21 $            -    $      2,021 16 17 LT-2-D-2 22                       Select Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC)                                   1,219                     7         11,842                 392               -            809                   -        14,270 18 Completed Activities - DCG RFP & Prep Subtotal                                                         $          1,219 $                    7 $      11,842 $                392   $          - $          809   $            -    $      14,270 19 (2) 20 LT-2-D-LOED                       Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification                                         69                 1,070             178                   (4)             -              51                   -        1,364 (2) 21 LT-D-SPV                         Special Purpose Vehicle Support                                                       -                    -            442                     -              -              6                   -          448 (2) 22 LT-3-D-RecB                       Records Backlog                                                                       -                    -          1,807                 186               -              20                   -        2,014 (2) 23 LT-3-D-S&S                       Simplification & Streamlining Project                                                 1                     6         1,329                   33               -              8                   -        1,377 24 Completed Activities - Transition Modifications Subtotal                                               $              69 $              1,076 $        3,757 $                215 $            - $            84 $                -  $      5,202 25 26 Completed Projects And Activities Subtotal                                                             $          10,771   $          14,534 $      183,294   $          1,368   $          -  $        7,877   $              -  $    217,845 27 28 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations (3) 29 SNF-1-D-7 02                     Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure                                   95               16,342         32,106             (12,796)               -            445             1,026         37,219 30 SNF-2-D-8 07                     ISFSI Pad Study                                                                       -                    -            199                     2             -              2                   -          203 (4) 31 SNF-2-D-8 08                     Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight                           1,284                   103         76,028               2,808               -            916             3,589         84,729 32 SNF-2-D-8 09                     Construct ISFSI Expansion                                                           96                     5         44,885                 267               -            177             4,225         49,655 (5) 33 SNF-2-D-8 10                     Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 2                                         24                 1,696         27,107               8,978               -            568               317         38,690 (5) 34 SNF-2-D-8 11                     Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 3                                         23                 1,696         19,640               8,979               -            490               528         31,357 (6) 35 SNF-2-D-8 12                     Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 2                             -                    -        17,684                     -              -              -            2,606         20,290 (6) 36 SNF-2-D-8 13                     Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 3                             -                    -        17,684                     -              -              -            2,606         20,290 37 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Subtotal                                                               $          1,523 $              19,842 $      235,332 $            8,239 $            - $        2,598 $          14,899   $    282,432 38 39 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 40                                   Prepare Integrated Work Sequence and Schedule for Decommissioning                     -                    -                                    -              -              -
3 LT-2-D-2 18 Planning & Design For Cold and Dark 1,888 1,008 14,977 1,054 1,373 20,299 4
41                                   Modify Containment Access- Unit 2                                                     -                    -                                    -              -              -
LT-2-D-2 19 Implement Cold and Dark (Repower Site) 2,151 415 52,191 (663) 1,522 55,615 5
42                                   Modify Containment Access- Unit 3                                                     -                    -                                    -            -                -
LT-2-D-2 20 Install 12 kV Service Line to Power Temp Power Ring 1,579 2,779 4,746 419 758 10,281 6
43                                   Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 2                                         -                    -                                    -                              -
LT-2-D-2 21 Drain & De-Energize Non-Essential Systems (DEC Process) 2,363 946 1,299 14 1,487 6,111 7
44                                   Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 2                                           -                    -                                    -                              -
LT-2-D-2 29 Implement Control Room Modifications (Command Center Relocation) 4 340 3
45                                   Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 3                                         -                    -                                    -                              -
3 350 8
46                                   Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 3                                           -                    -                                    -                              -
Completed Activities - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 7,981 5,152 73,553 826 5,143 92,655 9
47                                   Prepare Activity Specifications - U2                                                   -                    -                                    -            -                -
10 LT-2-D-2 26 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 2 139 2,814 1,159 31 129 4,271 11 LT-2-D-2 27 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 3 139 2,814 1,159 31 129 4,271 12 Completed Activities - Spent Fuel Islanding Subtotal 277 5,627 2,317 63 258 8,543 13 14 LT-2-D-2 07 Prepare Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR) 1 1,991 8
(2) 48                                  Waste Contracts                                                                       -                    -                                    -              -                -
21 2,021 15 Completed Activities - Phase 2 Regulatory Compliance Subtotal 1
49                                   Install GARDIAN System                                                                 -                    -                                    -              -                -
1,991 8
50 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal                               $                - $                  - $                $                -  $            $            -  $                  $
21 2,021 16 17 LT-2-D-2 22 Select Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) 1,219 7
1 Of 9
11,842 392 809 14,270 18 Completed Activities - DCG RFP & Prep Subtotal 1,219 7
                                                                                                                              %
11,842 392 809 14,270 19 20 LT-2-D-LOED (2) Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification 69 1,070 178 (4) 51 1,364 21 LT-D-SPV (2) Special Purpose Vehicle Support 442 6
448 22 LT-3-D-RecB (2) Records Backlog 1,807 186 20 2,014 23 LT-3-D-S&S (2) Simplification & Streamlining Project 1
6 1,329 33 8
1,377 24 Completed Activities - Transition Modifications Subtotal 69 1,076 3,757 215 84 5,202 25 26 Completed Projects And Activities Subtotal 10,771 14,534 183,294 1,368 7,877 217,845 27 28 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 29 SNF-1-D-7 02 Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure (3) 95 16,342 32,106 (12,796) 445 1,026 37,219 30 SNF-2-D-8 07 ISFSI Pad Study 199 2
2 203 31 SNF-2-D-8 08 Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight (4) 1,284 103 76,028 2,808 916 3,589 84,729 32 SNF-2-D-8 09 Construct ISFSI Expansion 96 5
44,885 267 177 4,225 49,655 33 SNF-2-D-8 10 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 2 (5) 24 1,696 27,107 8,978 568 317 38,690 34 SNF-2-D-8 11 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 3 (5) 23 1,696 19,640 8,979 490 528 31,357 35 SNF-2-D-8 12 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 2 (6) 17,684 2,606 20,290 36 SNF-2-D-8 13 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 3 (6) 17,684 2,606 20,290 37 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Subtotal 1,523 19,842 235,332 8,239 2,598 14,899 282,432 38 39 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 40 Prepare Integrated Work Sequence and Schedule for Decommissioning 41 Modify Containment Access-Unit 2 42 Modify Containment Access-Unit 3 43 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 2 44 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 2 45 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 3 46 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 3 47 Prepare Activity Specifications - U2 48 (2) Waste Contracts 49 Install GARDIAN System 50 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 1 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                Description                                                           Labor                 Material     Contract         Other           Disposal     Overheads     Contingency   Total 51 52                               Design, Specify, and Procure Special Items and Materials                         -                  -                                -            -              -
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 51 52 Design, Specify, and Procure Special Items and Materials 53 Test Special Cutting and Handling Equipment and Train Operators 54 Finalize Internals and Vessel Segmenting Details - Unit 2 55 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 2 56 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 3 57 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Internals and Vessel Segmentation Subtotal 58 59 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 2 60 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 3 61 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 2 62 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 3 63 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 2 64 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 3 65 Remove Protected Area Security Fencing 66 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Removal Of Spent Fuel Systems/Equipment Subtotal 67 68 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 2 69 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 3 70 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Steam Generator Removal Subtotal 71 72 Upgrade Rail Spur 73 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 2 74 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 3 75 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Non-Essential System Removal Subtotal 76 77 Remove, Package and Dispose of Essential Systems 78 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 2 79 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 2 80 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 3 81 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 3 82 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 2 83 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 3 84 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 2 85 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 3 86 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Large Component Removal Subtotal 87 88 Demolish Service Building (K-10, 20, 30) 89 Demolish South Security Processing Facility (K-70) 90 Demolish South Yard Area Buildings T-10, 20, 60 and Haz Mat 91 Procure Clean Building Demolition Equipment 92 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 3 93 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 2 94 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 2 95 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 2 96 Demolish AWS Building 97 Demolish Building L-50 2 Of 9
53                               Test Special Cutting and Handling Equipment and Train Operators                   -                  -                                -            -              -
%
54                               Finalize Internals and Vessel Segmenting Details - Unit 2                         -                  -                                -            -              -
55                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 2                       -                  -                                -                            -
56                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 3                       -                  -                              -                            -
57 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Internals and Vessel Segmentation Subtotal           $              - $                - $            $                - $              $          - $              $
58 59                               Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 2                                         -                  -                                -            -              -
60                               Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 3                                         -                  -                                -            -              -
61                               Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 2                         -                  -                                -                            -
62                               Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 3                         -                  -                                -                            -
63                               Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 2                         -                  -                                -            -              -
64                               Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 3                         -                  -                                -            -              -
65                               Remove Protected Area Security Fencing                                           -                  -                                -            -              -
66 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Removal Of Spent Fuel Systems/Equipment Subtotal     $              -    $              -  $            $                -  $            $          -  $            $
67 68                               Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 2                                 -                  -                                -                            -
69                               Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 3                                 -                  -                                -                            -
70 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Steam Generator Removal Subtotal                     $              -    $              -  $          $                -  $            $          -  $            $
71 72                               Upgrade Rail Spur                                                               -                  -                                -            -              -
73                               Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 2                     -                  -                                -                            -
74                               Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 3                     -                  -                                -                            -
75 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Non-Essential System Removal Subtotal               $                - $                - $            $                - $            $            - $            $
76 77                               Remove, Package and Dispose of Essential Systems                                 -                  -                                -                            -
78                               Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 2                           -                  -                                -                            -
79                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 2                 -                  -                                -                            -
80                               Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 3                           -                  -                                -                            -
81                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 3                 -                  -                                -                            -
82                               Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 2                                       -                  -                                -                            -
83                               Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 3                                       -                  -                              -                            -
84                               Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 2                               -                  -                                -                            -
85                               Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 3                             -                  -                                -                            -
86 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Large Component Removal Subtotal                     $              - $                - $            $                - $              $          - $              $
87 88                               Demolish Service Building (K-10, 20, 30)                                         -                  -                                -                            -
89                               Demolish South Security Processing Facility (K-70)                               -                  -                                -                            -
90                               Demolish South Yard Area Buildings T-10, 20, 60 and Haz Mat                     -                  -                                -                            -
91                               Procure Clean Building Demolition Equipment                                     -                  -                                -                            -
92                               Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 3                                     -                  -                                -                            -
93                               Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 2                                     -                  -                                -                            -
94                               Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 2                       -                    -                                -                            -
95                               Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 2                             -                  -                                -                            -
96                               Demolish AWS Building                                                             -                  -                                -                            -
97                               Demolish Building L-50                                                           -                  -                                -                            -
2 Of 9
                                                                                                                    %


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                Description                                                         Labor               Material     Contract         Other           Disposal     Overheads     Contingency   Total 98                               Demolish Maintenance Building 4 (B-64/B-65)                                   -                  -                                -                          -
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 98 Demolish Maintenance Building 4 (B-64/B-65) 99 Demolish Maintenance Building 5 (B-62/B-63) 100 Demolish Outage Control Center 101 Demolish Maintenance Building 2 (B-49/B-50) 102 Demolish Maintenance Building 1 (B-43/B-44) 103 Demolish Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 104 Demolish Auxiliary Control Building - Common 105 Remove Systems and Demolish Make-Up Demineralizer Structures 106 Install Concrete Plugs in Intake and Discharge Structures 107 Demolish Intake and Discharge Structures to 3-Feet Below Grade 108 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial Plant Building Demo Subtotal 1
99                               Demolish Maintenance Building 5 (B-62/B-63)                                   -                  -                                -                          -
109 110 Decon Containment Building - Unit 3 111 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 3 112 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 113 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 3 114 Decon Containment Building - Unit 2 115 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 2 116 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 2 117 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 2 118 Decon Turbine Building - Unit 2 119 Decon Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 120 Decon Auxiliary Control Building - Common 121 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Building Decontamination Subtotal 2
100                               Demolish Outage Control Center                                                 -                  -                                -                          -
122 123 Remove Protected Area Pavement 124 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 3 125 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 3 126 Demolish Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 127 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 3 128 Demolish Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 129 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 2 130 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Plant Building Demo Subtotal 131 132 (2) Offshore Conduit Diffuser and Risers 133 134 (2) Backfill 135 136 Demolish Staging Warehouse 137 Demolish Administration Building (K-40/50) 138 Detension and Remove Unit 3 Containment Building Tendons 139 Demolish Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 140 Demolish Unit 3 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 141 Detension and Remove Unit 2 Containment Building Tendons 142 Demolish Safety and MSIV Equipment Building - Unit 2 143 Demolish Unit 2 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 144 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Containment Building Demo Subtotal 145 3 Of 9
101                               Demolish Maintenance Building 2 (B-49/B-50)                                   -                  -                                -                          -
%
102                               Demolish Maintenance Building 1 (B-43/B-44)                                   -                  -                                -                          -
103                               Demolish Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common                                 -                  -                                -                          -
104                               Demolish Auxiliary Control Building - Common                                   -                  -                                -                          -
105                               Remove Systems and Demolish Make-Up Demineralizer Structures                   -                  -                              -                          -
106                               Install Concrete Plugs in Intake and Discharge Structures                     -                  -                              -            -            -
107                               Demolish Intake and Discharge Structures to 3-Feet Below Grade                 -                  -                              -                          -
108 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial Plant Building Demo Subtotal               $              - $                - $            $                - $            $          - $            $    1 109 110                               Decon Containment Building - Unit 3                                           -                  -                              -                          -
111                               Decon Penetration Building - Unit 3                                           -                  -                              -                          -
112                               Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3                             -                  -                              -                          -
113                               Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 3                                         -                  -                              -                          -
114                               Decon Containment Building - Unit 2                                           -                  -                              -                          -
115                               Decon Penetration Building - Unit 2                                           -                  -                              -                          -
116                               Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 2                             -                  -                              -                          -
117                               Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 2                                         -                  -                              -                          -
118                               Decon Turbine Building - Unit 2                                               -                  -                              -                          -
119                               Decon Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common                                     -                -                                -                          -
120                               Decon Auxiliary Control Building - Common                                     -                  -                                -                          -
121 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Building Decontamination Subtotal                 $              - $                - $            $                - $            $          - $            $    2 122 123                               Remove Protected Area Pavement                                                 -                  -                                -                          -
124                               Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 3                     -                  -                                -                          -
125                               Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 3                         -                  -                                -                          -
126                               Demolish Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                   -                  -                              -                          -
127                               Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 3                                         -                  -                              -                          -
128                               Demolish Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                   -                  -                              -                          -
129                               Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 2                                         -                  -                              -                          -
130 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Plant Building Demo Subtotal                 $              - $                - $            $                - $            $          - $            $
131 (2) 132                              Offshore Conduit Diffuser and Risers                                           -                  -                                -            -            -
133 (2) 134                              Backfill                                                                       -                  -                                -            -            -
135 136                               Demolish Staging Warehouse                                                     -                  -                                -                          -
137                               Demolish Administration Building (K-40/50)                                     -                  -                                -                          -
138                               Detension and Remove Unit 3 Containment Building Tendons                       -                  -                                -            -            -
139                               Demolish Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3                           -                  -                                -                          -
140                               Demolish Unit 3 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                     -                  -                              -                          -
141                               Detension and Remove Unit 2 Containment Building Tendons                       -                  -                              -                          -
142                               Demolish Safety and MSIV Equipment Building - Unit 2                           -                  -                              -                          -
143                               Demolish Unit 2 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                     -                  -                              -                          -
144 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Containment Building Demo Subtotal                 $              - $                - $            $                - $            $          - $            $
145 3 Of 9
                                                                                                                    %


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.              Description                                                           Labor               Material       Cont                 Other           Disposal     Overheads       Contingency       Total 146                               Prepare License Termination Plan                                                 -                    -                                    -            -              -
Description Labor Material Cont Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 146 Prepare License Termination Plan 147 Final Status Survey 148 Subsurface Structure Removal Engineering Planning and Design 149 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Survey/License Termination Subtotal 150 151 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 152 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 153 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Waste Subtotal 154 155 156 157 158 159 Other Projects 160 SNF-2-D-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Relicensing (7) 12,550 8
147                               Final Status Survey                                                               -                    -                                    -                            -
2,441 14,998 161 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1 (2) Holtec ISFSI I&M Program Development (7) 14,892 25 3
148                               Subsurface Structure Removal Engineering Planning and Design                     -                    -                                    -            -              -
2,843 17,763 162 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 2 (2) Holtec ISFSI Relicensing 5,000 1,000 6,000 163 ISFSI Aging Management Subtotal 32,441 32 3
149 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Survey/License Termination Subtotal             $              - $                  - $                $                - $            $            - $                $
6,284 38,761 164 165 SNF-2-D-EP Holtec (2) Environmental Permitting - Holtec 3,000 600 3,600 166 SNF-2-D-EP Areva (2) Environmental Permitting - Areva 1,650 330 1,980 167 Coastal Development Permit Extension Subtotal 4,650 930 5,580 168 169 SNF-2-D-GTCC (2) GTCC Waste Storage 22,616 5,654 28,270 170 171 SR-1-D-14 01 Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender (8) 526 7,213 25 173 1,118 9,054 172 SR-1-D-14 02 Disposition Hazardous Waste from Mesa Site 113 10 73 195 173 SR-1-D-14 03 Mesa Site Characterization Survey 15 138 (102) 10 61 174 SR-2-D-15 02 Obtain Required Permits - Mesa (9) 55 26 1
150 (2) 151                              Waste Taxes (Pass Through)                                                       -                    -              -                    -                            -
82 175 SR-2-D-15 09 Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance (10) 258 42 8,783 64 99 545 9,791 176 SR-2-D-15 11 Demolish Mesa Roads and Parking Lots 396 591 197 1,185 177 SR-2-D-15 12 Finish Grading and Re-vegetate Mesa Site 400 304 141 845 178 Mesa Site Turnover Subtotal 911 838 17,093 13 356 2,001 21,212 179 180 LT-3-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 2,183 375 189 2,747 181 SNF-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 1,000 150 1,150 182 DCE Update Subtotal 3,183 375 339 3,897 183 184 SR-3-D-16 05 Obtain CEQA Permit & Approvals (11) 947 16 5,896 327 433 712 8,331 185 SR-3-D-16 03 Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal and Plant Easement (12) 2,377 9,418 640 647 2,223 15,305 186 SR-D-NEPA 2 (2) Plant Lease Extension 1,397 1,576 45 414 686 4,118 187 SR-D-NEPA 3 (2) Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration 1,663 5,532 54 493 1,548 9,290 188 SNF-D-GTCC Disp (2) GTCC Disposal 36,000 7,200 43,200 189 SNF-2-D-CDP (2) ISFSI CDP Settlement 3,743 800 4,543 190 SR-D-RFP (2) Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 4,741 59 1,406 1,241 7,447 191 SNF-1-D-7 05 Cyber Security Modifications 341 671 8,241 55 336 9,644 192 SNF-D-NIA Sump (2) NIA Sump Modifications 1,000 150 1,150 193 Other Projects Subtotal 12,377 1,583 151,389 2,341 4,088 28,969 200,748 194 4 Of 9
(2) 152                              Waste Taxes (Pass Through)                                                       -                    -              -                    -                            -
%
153 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Waste Subtotal                                       $              -  $                - $            -  $                - $            $            - $                $
154 155                                                                                                                 -                    -                                  -            -              -
156 157                                                                                                 $              -  $                - $                $                -  $            $            - $                $
158 159 Other Projects (2)                                                              (7) 160 SNF-2-D-AM Areva             Areva ISFSI Relicensing                                                           -                    -        12,550                   8             -              -            2,441         14,998 (2)                                                              (7) 161 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1           Holtec ISFSI I&M Program Development                                             -                    -        14,892                   25             -              3           2,843         17,763 (2) 162 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 2           Holtec ISFSI Relicensing                                                         -                    -          5,000                     -            -              -            1,000         6,000 163 ISFSI Aging Management Subtotal                                                                 $              -  $                - $      32,441   $              32 $          - $            3 $          6,284 $      38,761 164 (2) 165 SNF-2-D-EP Holtec             Environmental Permitting - Holtec                                                 -                    -          3,000                     -            -              -              600         3,600 (2) 166 SNF-2-D-EP Areva             Environmental Permitting - Areva                                                 -                    -          1,650                     -            -              -              330         1,980 167 Coastal Development Permit Extension Subtotal                                                   $              -  $                - $        4,650   $                - $          - $            - $            930 $      5,580 168 (2) 169 SNF-2-D-GTCC                 GTCC Waste Storage                                                               -                    -        22,616                     -            -              -            5,654         28,270 170 (8) 171 SR-1-D-14 01                 Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender                   526                   -          7,213                   25             -            173           1,118         9,054 172 SR-1-D-14 02                 Disposition Hazardous Waste from Mesa Site                                     113                   -            10                     -            -              73                 -          195 173 SR-1-D-14 03                 Mesa Site Characterization Survey                                               15                   -            138                 (102)           -              10                 -            61 (9) 174 SR-2-D-15 02                 Obtain Required Permits - Mesa                                                   -                    -            55                   26             -              1                 -            82 (10) 175 SR-2-D-15 09                 Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance                                             258                   42         8,783                   64             -              99             545         9,791 176 SR-2-D-15 11                 Demolish Mesa Roads and Parking Lots                                             -                  396           591                     -            -              -              197         1,185 177 SR-2-D-15 12                 Finish Grading and Re-vegetate Mesa Site                                         -                  400           304                     -            -              -              141           845 178 Mesa Site Turnover Subtotal                                                                     $            911   $              838 $      17,093   $              13 $          - $          356 $          2,001 $    21,212 179 (2) 180 LT-3-D-DCE                   DCE Update                                                                       -                    -          2,183                 375             -              -              189         2,747 (2) 181 SNF-D-DCE                     DCE Update                                                                       -                    -          1,000                     -            -              -              150         1,150 182 DCE Update Subtotal                                                                             $              -  $                - $        3,183   $              375 $          - $            - $            339 $      3,897 183 (11) 184 SR-3-D-16 05                 Obtain CEQA Permit & Approvals                                                 947                   16         5,896                 327             -            433             712         8,331 (12) 185 SR-3-D-16 03                 Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal and Plant Easement                 2,377                   -          9,418                 640             -            647           2,223         15,305 (2) 186 SR-D-NEPA 2                   Plant Lease Extension                                                         1,397                   -          1,576                   45             -            414             686         4,118 (2) 187 SR-D-NEPA 3                   Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration                             1,663                   -          5,532                   54             -            493           1,548         9,290 (2) 188 SNF-D-GTCC Disp               GTCC Disposal                                                                     -                    -        36,000                     -            -              -            7,200         43,200 (2) 189 SNF-2-D-CDP                   ISFSI CDP Settlement                                                             -                    -          3,743                 800             -              -                -        4,543 (2) 190 SR-D-RFP                     Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement                                   4,741                   59               -                    -            -          1,406             1,241         7,447 191 SNF-1-D-7 05                 Cyber Security Modifications                                                   341                 671         8,241                   55             -            336                 -        9,644 (2) 192 SNF-D-NIA Sump               NIA Sump Modifications                                                           -                    -          1,000                     -            -              -              150         1,150 193 Other Projects Subtotal                                                                         $          12,377   $            1,583 $      151,389   $          2,341   $          - $        4,088 $        28,969 $    200,748 194 4 Of 9
                                                                                                                      %


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.              Description                                                                           Labor               Material       Contract           Other           Disposal       Overheads       Contingency     Total 195 Substructure Removal (2) 196 SR-D-BKFL REM                 Backfill Removal                                                                             3,358               2,713             -                    -              -            996           1,767         8,833 197 SR-5-D-18 02                 Install Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring                                                       -              20,385         10,280                   -              -              -            7,666       38,332 198 SR-5-D-18 03                 Install Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment and Discharge Controls                           -                    -              -            29,053               -              -            7,263       36,316 199 SR-5-D-18 04                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet                               -                  292           207                   -            569               -              267         1,334 200 SR-5-D-18 05                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet                             -                  166           118                   -            276               -              140           701 201 SR-5-D-18 06                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet                                 -                  449           344                   -            938               -              433         2,163 202 SR-5-D-18 07                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet                         -                1,183         1,062                   -          1,819               -            1,016         5,079 203 SR-5-D-18 08                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation                     -                5,374         4,502                   -          7,880               -            4,439       22,195 204 SR-5-D-18 09                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet                             -                  841           828                   -          4,120               -            1,447         7,237 205 SR-5-D-18 10                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet                                       -                  394           323                   -            801               -              380         1,899 206 SR-5-D-18 11                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet                                     -                  148           104                   -            256               -              127           637 207 SR-5-D-18 12                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Containment Building Below -3 Feet                                   -                1,789         1,358                   -          5,048               -            2,049       10,243 208 SR-5-D-18 13                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet                               -                  292           207                   -            569               -              267         1,334 209 SR-5-D-18 14                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet                             -                  166           118                   -            276               -              140           701 210 SR-5-D-18 15                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet                                 -                  449           344                   -            938               -              433         2,163 211 SR-5-D-18 16                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet                         -                1,282         1,098                   -          1,819               -            1,050         5,249 212 SR-5-D-18 17                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation                     -                5,374         4,502                   -          7,881               -            4,439       22,195 213 SR-5-D-18 18                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet                             -                  841           828                   -          4,120               -            1,447         7,237 214 SR-5-D-18 19                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet                                       -                  394           323                   -            801               -              380         1,899 215 SR-5-D-18 20                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet                                     -                  405           248                   -            256               -              227         1,137 216 SR-5-D-18 21                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Containment Building Below -3 Feet                                   -                1,786         1,356                   -          5,048               -            2,047       10,237 217 SR-5-D-18 22                 Demolish and Backfill Intake Structure Below -3 Feet                                             -              10,418         7,867                   -        25,339               -          10,906       54,529 218 SR-5-D-18 24                 Remove Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring                                                       -                    -        11,967                   -              -              -            2,992       14,958 219 SR-5-D-18 25                 Remove Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment                                                   -                    -              -              6,947               -              -            1,737         8,684 220 SR-6-D-19 06                 Remove and Stockpile Existing Seawall Erosion Protection                                         -                  11             6                   -              -              -                4           21 221 SR-6-D-19 07                 Remove Unit 2 and 3 Seawall and Pedestrian Walkway                                               -                3,032         3,258                   -          4,606               -            2,724       13,620 222 SR-6-D-19 08                 Remove Remaining Intake and Outfall Box Culvert                                                   -                  464           341                   -          2,211               -              754         3,770 223 SR-6-D-19 10                 Backfill and Compaction of Excavation                                                             -                2,217         1,495                   -              -              -              928         4,640 224 Substructure Removal Subtotal                                                                                   $          3,358   $          60,862 $      53,084 $          36,000   $      75,573 $          996 $        57,468 $    287,340 225 226 Offshore Conduit Removal 227 SR-3-D-16 01                 Hydrogeologic Investigation and Outfall Conduit Survey                                           -                  130           302                 104               -              -              134           670 228 SR-5-D-18 23                 Remove Off Shore Intake and Outfall Conduits                                                     -              43,901         12,606                   -        19,788               -          19,074       95,369 229 Offshore Conduit Removal Subtotal                                                                               $              -  $          44,031 $      12,908 $              104 $      19,788 $            - $        19,208 $      96,039 230 231 ISFSI Demolition 232 SNF D&D-1-D-12 01             Preparation and NRC Review of License Termination Plan                                           -                    -            118                 161               -              -              70           349 233 SNF D&D-2-D-13 01             Install GARDIAN Bulk Assay System                                                                 -                    -              -                546               -              -              137           683 (13) 234 SNF D&D-2-D-13 02             Decon Areva Modules                                                                               -                  47           111                   -            141               -              75           374 235 SNF D&D-2-D-13 03             Final Status Survey of ISFSI                                                                     -                  82           520                   -              -              -              151           753 (14) 236 SNF D&D-2-D-13 04             Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules                                                         -                1,049         1,923                   -          1,270               -            1,060         5,302 (15) 237 SNF D&D-2-D-13 05             Demolish ISFSI Security Building                                                                 -                  266           199                   -            528               -              248         1,240 238 SNF D&D-2-D-13 06             Restore ISFSI Site                                                                               -                  512           346                   -              -              -              215         1,073 239 SNF D&D-2-D-13 07             Preparation of Final Report on Decommissioning and NRC Review                                     -                    -            55                   -              -              -              14           69 (2) 240 SNF D&D-2-D-13 08             Clean Demo of Holtec ISFSI Pad and Modules                                                       -                1,946         1,452                   -          4,910               -            2,077       10,386 241 ISFSI Demolition Subtotal                                                                                       $              -  $            3,902 $        4,725 $              707 $        6,849 $            - $          4,046 $      20,229 242 5 Of 9
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 195 Substructure Removal 196 SR-D-BKFL REM (2) Backfill Removal 3,358 2,713 996 1,767 8,833 197 SR-5-D-18 02 Install Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 20,385 10,280 7,666 38,332 198 SR-5-D-18 03 Install Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment and Discharge Controls 29,053 7,263 36,316 199 SR-5-D-18 04 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 292 207 569 267 1,334 200 SR-5-D-18 05 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 166 118 276 140 701 201 SR-5-D-18 06 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 449 344 938 433 2,163 202 SR-5-D-18 07 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,183 1,062 1,819 1,016 5,079 203 SR-5-D-18 08 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,374 4,502 7,880 4,439 22,195 204 SR-5-D-18 09 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 841 828 4,120 1,447 7,237 205 SR-5-D-18 10 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 394 323 801 380 1,899 206 SR-5-D-18 11 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 148 104 256 127 637 207 SR-5-D-18 12 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,789 1,358 5,048 2,049 10,243 208 SR-5-D-18 13 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 292 207 569 267 1,334 209 SR-5-D-18 14 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 166 118 276 140 701 210 SR-5-D-18 15 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 449 344 938 433 2,163 211 SR-5-D-18 16 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,282 1,098 1,819 1,050 5,249 212 SR-5-D-18 17 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,374 4,502 7,881 4,439 22,195 213 SR-5-D-18 18 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 841 828 4,120 1,447 7,237 214 SR-5-D-18 19 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 394 323 801 380 1,899 215 SR-5-D-18 20 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 405 248 256 227 1,137 216 SR-5-D-18 21 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,786 1,356 5,048 2,047 10,237 217 SR-5-D-18 22 Demolish and Backfill Intake Structure Below -3 Feet 10,418 7,867 25,339 10,906 54,529 218 SR-5-D-18 24 Remove Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 11,967 2,992 14,958 219 SR-5-D-18 25 Remove Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment 6,947 1,737 8,684 220 SR-6-D-19 06 Remove and Stockpile Existing Seawall Erosion Protection 11 6
                                                                                                                                      %
4 21 221 SR-6-D-19 07 Remove Unit 2 and 3 Seawall and Pedestrian Walkway 3,032 3,258 4,606 2,724 13,620 222 SR-6-D-19 08 Remove Remaining Intake and Outfall Box Culvert 464 341 2,211 754 3,770 223 SR-6-D-19 10 Backfill and Compaction of Excavation 2,217 1,495 928 4,640 224 Substructure Removal Subtotal 3,358 60,862 53,084 36,000 75,573 996 57,468 287,340 225 226 Offshore Conduit Removal 227 SR-3-D-16 01 Hydrogeologic Investigation and Outfall Conduit Survey 130 302 104 134 670 228 SR-5-D-18 23 Remove Off Shore Intake and Outfall Conduits 43,901 12,606 19,788 19,074 95,369 229 Offshore Conduit Removal Subtotal 44,031 12,908 104 19,788 19,208 96,039 230 231 ISFSI Demolition 232 SNF D&D-1-D-12 01 Preparation and NRC Review of License Termination Plan 118 161 70 349 233 SNF D&D-2-D-13 01 Install GARDIAN Bulk Assay System 546 137 683 234 SNF D&D-2-D-13 02 Decon Areva Modules (13) 47 111 141 75 374 235 SNF D&D-2-D-13 03 Final Status Survey of ISFSI 82 520 151 753 236 SNF D&D-2-D-13 04 Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules (14) 1,049 1,923 1,270 1,060 5,302 237 SNF D&D-2-D-13 05 Demolish ISFSI Security Building (15) 266 199 528 248 1,240 238 SNF D&D-2-D-13 06 Restore ISFSI Site 512 346 215 1,073 239 SNF D&D-2-D-13 07 Preparation of Final Report on Decommissioning and NRC Review 55 14 69 240 SNF D&D-2-D-13 08 (2) Clean Demo of Holtec ISFSI Pad and Modules 1,946 1,452 4,910 2,077 10,386 241 ISFSI Demolition Subtotal 3,902 4,725 707 6,849 4,046 20,229 242 5 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                Description                                                     Labor               Material       Contract             Other           Disposal       Overheads       Contingency     Total 243 Final Site Restoration 244 SR-6-D-19 01                     Obtain Required Permits and Approvals                                       -                  20             410                 130               -              -              140           700 245 SR-6-D-19 03                     Procure Site Restoration Equipment                                         -                  400               -                    -              -              -              100           500 246 SR-6-D-19 12                     Install Shoreline Erosion Control and Restoration Features                 -                  142             10                     -              -              -              38           190 247 SR-6-D-19 13                     Remove Railroad Tracks, Rails and Ballast                                 -                  35             64                   -                -              -              25           123 248 SR-6-D-19 14                     Remove Gunite Slope Protection                                             -                  362             267                   -          1,728               -              589         2,946 249 SR-6-D-19 15                     Remove Access Roads and Parking Lots                                       -                  179             244                   -              -                -              106           529 250 SR-6-D-19 16                     Finish Grading and Re-Vegetate Site                                       -                  834             987                   -              -              -              455         2,276 251 Final Site Restoration Subtotal                                                             $              -  $            1,973 $        1,981   $              130 $        1,728 $            -  $          1,453 $      7,267 252 253 Distributed Subtotal 254 255 Labor-Staffing 256 LT-U-1 01                       Utility Staff                                                       153,426                   544         101,384               1,302               -        59,298           16,414     332,367 257 SNF-U-2 01                       Utility Staff                                                       196,990                   399         39,185               1,045               -        68,546           18,789     324,954 258 SR-U-3 01                       Utility Staff                                                         44,437                   24         61,492                   68               -        11,056           11,423     128,499 259 Utility Staff Subtotal                                                                     $        394,852   $              967 $      202,061   $          2,415   $            - $      138,899 $        46,625 $    785,820 260 261 LT-U-1 03                       Security Force                                                       11,563                   4             146                   17               -          2,200               601       14,532 262 SNF-U-2 04                       Security Force                                                     163,052                   58           2,487                   45               -        54,788           12,148     232,580 263 Security Force Subtotal                                                                     $        174,615   $              62 $        2,633   $              63 $            -  $      56,989 $        12,749 $    247,112 264 265 Labor-Staffing Subtotal                                                                     $        569,468   $            1,029 $      204,694   $          2,478   $            -  $      195,888 $        59,375 $  1,032,932 266 267 Non-Labor (2) 268 SNF-U-AM Areva                   Areva ISFSI Aging Management                                               -                    -          3,713                     -              -              -              557         4,270 (2) 269 SNF-U-AM Holtec                 Holtec ISFSI Aging Management                                               -                    -        10,400                     -              -              -            1,560       11,960 270 Aging Management Subtotal                                                                   $              -  $                - $      14,113   $                - $            - $            - $          2,117 $      16,230 271 272 LT-U-1 17                       Association Fees and Expenses                                             -                    3           2,393               2,193               -              9               540         5,138 (2) 273 SNF-U-2 26                       Association Fees and Expenses                                               -                    -            212               1,838               -              -              307         2,357 (2) 274 SR-U-3 17                       Association Fees and Expenses                                               -                    -            481                 793               -              -              191         1,466 275 Association Fees and Expenses Subtotal                                                     $              -  $                3 $        3,086   $          4,825   $            - $            9 $          1,039 $      8,961 276 277 LT-U-1 15                       Community Engagement Panel                                               382                   63           2,324               4,285               -            157               679         7,890 (2) 278 SNF-U-2 25                       Community Engagement Panel                                                 -                    -            26               2,440               -              -              370         2,836 (2) 279 SR-U-3 21                       Community Engagement Panel                                                 -                    -              8               1,933               -              -              291         2,232 280 Community Engagement Panel Subtotal                                                         $            382   $              63 $        2,358   $          8,658   $            - $          157 $          1,340 $      12,958 281 6 Of 9
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 243 Final Site Restoration 244 SR-6-D-19 01 Obtain Required Permits and Approvals 20 410 130 140 700 245 SR-6-D-19 03 Procure Site Restoration Equipment 400 100 500 246 SR-6-D-19 12 Install Shoreline Erosion Control and Restoration Features 142 10 38 190 247 SR-6-D-19 13 Remove Railroad Tracks, Rails and Ballast 35 64 25 123 248 SR-6-D-19 14 Remove Gunite Slope Protection 362 267 1,728 589 2,946 249 SR-6-D-19 15 Remove Access Roads and Parking Lots 179 244 106 529 250 SR-6-D-19 16 Finish Grading and Re-Vegetate Site 834 987 455 2,276 251 Final Site Restoration Subtotal 1,973 1,981 130 1,728 1,453 7,267 252 253 Distributed Subtotal 254 255 Labor-Staffing 256 LT-U-1 01 Utility Staff 153,426 544 101,384 1,302 59,298 16,414 332,367 257 SNF-U-2 01 Utility Staff 196,990 399 39,185 1,045 68,546 18,789 324,954 258 SR-U-3 01 Utility Staff 44,437 24 61,492 68 11,056 11,423 128,499 259 Utility Staff Subtotal 394,852 967 202,061 2,415 138,899 46,625 785,820 260 261 LT-U-1 03 Security Force 11,563 4
                                                                                                                  %
146 17 2,200 601 14,532 262 SNF-U-2 04 Security Force 163,052 58 2,487 45 54,788 12,148 232,580 263 Security Force Subtotal 174,615 62 2,633 63 56,989 12,749 247,112 264 265 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 569,468 1,029 204,694 2,478 195,888 59,375 1,032,932 266 267 Non-Labor 268 SNF-U-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Aging Management 3,713 557 4,270 269 SNF-U-AM Holtec (2) Holtec ISFSI Aging Management 10,400 1,560 11,960 270 Aging Management Subtotal 14,113 2,117 16,230 271 272 LT-U-1 17 Association Fees and Expenses 3
2,393 2,193 9
540 5,138 273 SNF-U-2 26 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 212 1,838 307 2,357 274 SR-U-3 17 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 481 793 191 1,466 275 Association Fees and Expenses Subtotal 3
3,086 4,825 9
1,039 8,961 276 277 LT-U-1 15 Community Engagement Panel 382 63 2,324 4,285 157 679 7,890 278 SNF-U-2 25 (2) Community Engagement Panel 26 2,440 370 2,836 279 SR-U-3 21 (2) Community Engagement Panel 8
1,933 291 2,232 280 Community Engagement Panel Subtotal 382 63 2,358 8,658 157 1,340 12,958 281 6 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
DCE No.(1)
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 282 LT-U-1 08 Contracted Services (16) 705 9,613 78,768 7,991 92 6,641 103,810 283 SNF-U-2 11 Contracted Services (16) 349 11,718 62,692 18,422 165 10,528 103,875 284 SR-U-3 06 Contracted Services (16) 19 761 21,008 2,452 18 3,433 27,690 285 SR-U-Bank (2) Bank Fees And Interest (68)
(68) 286 SR-U-Inv Adj (2) Vendor Invoice Adjustment (213)
(1)
(1)
DCE No.                Description                                Labor                Material      Contract            Other            Disposal    Overheads        Contingency      Total (16) 282 LT-U-1 08                      Contracted Services                                  705                9,613        78,768              7,991              -              92            6,641      103,810 (16) 283 SNF-U-2 11                    Contracted Services                                  349              11,718        62,692            18,422              -            165            10,528      103,875 (16) 284 SR-U-3 06                      Contracted Services                                  19                  761        21,008              2,452              -              18            3,433        27,690 (2) 285 SR-U-Bank                      Bank Fees And Interest                                -                    -              -                  (68)            -              -                -          (68)
(214) 287 Contracted Services Subtotal 1,073 22,092 162,468 28,583 274 20,602 235,092 288 289 LT-U-1 09 DAW Disposal 21 21 290 SNF-U-2 12 DAW Disposal 10 10 291 DAW Disposal Subtotal 32 32 292 293 LT-U-1 25 Decommissioning Advisor 735 6,854 10 25 698 8,322 294 SNF-U-2 28 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 292 44 336 295 SR-U-3 22 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 1,528 229 1,758 296 Decommissioning Advisor Subtotal 735 8,674 10 25 971 10,416 297 298 LT-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 2,696 404 3,100 299 SR-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 746 112 857 300 DGC Executive Oversight Committee Subtotal 3,441 516 3,958 301 302 SNF-U-2 09 Emergency Preparedness Fees 22 150 44,615 90 5,103 49,980 303 Emergency Preparedness Fees Subtotal 22 150 44,615 90 5,103 49,980 304 305 LT-U-1 10 Energy 46,606 137 4,762 51,505 306 SNF-U-2 13 Energy 16,988 31 2,036 19,055 307 SR-U-3 07 Energy 14,814 2,222 17,036 308 Energy Subtotal 78,408 168 9,020 87,596 309 310 LT-U-1 24 Environmental Permits and Fees 2
(2) 286 SR-U-Inv Adj                  Vendor Invoice Adjustment                              -                    -              -                (213)            -              (1)                -          (214) 287 Contracted Services Subtotal                                         $          1,073   $          22,092 $      162,468 $          28,583   $          - $          274 $        20,602 $    235,092 288 289 LT-U-1 09                     DAW Disposal                                           -                    -            21                   -            -              -                -            21 290 SNF-U-2 12                     DAW Disposal                                           -                    -            10                   -            -              -                -            10 291 DAW Disposal Subtotal                                                 $              -  $                - $          32 $                -  $          - $            -  $              - $          32 292 293 LT-U-1 25                     Decommissioning Advisor                               -                  735         6,854                   10             -              25               698         8,322 (2) 294 SNF-U-2 28                     Decommissioning Advisor                               -                    -            292                   -            -              -                44           336 (2) 295 SR-U-3 22                     Decommissioning Advisor                               -                    -          1,528                   -            -              -              229         1,758 296 Decommissioning Advisor Subtotal                                     $              -  $              735 $        8,674 $                10 $          - $            25 $            971 $      10,416 297 (2) 298 LT-U-CO                       DGC Executive Oversight Committee                     -                    -          2,696                   -            -              -              404         3,100 (2) 299 SR-U-CO                       DGC Executive Oversight Committee                     -                    -            746                   -            -              -              112           857 300 DGC Executive Oversight Committee Subtotal                           $              -  $                - $        3,441 $                -  $          - $            -  $            516 $      3,958 301 302 SNF-U-2 09                     Emergency Preparedness Fees                           -                  22           150             44,615               -              90             5,103       49,980 303 Emergency Preparedness Fees Subtotal                                 $              -  $              22 $          150 $          44,615   $          - $            90 $          5,103 $      49,980 304 305 LT-U-1 10                     Energy                                                 -                    -              -            46,606               -            137             4,762       51,505 306 SNF-U-2 13                     Energy                                                 -                    -              -            16,988               -              31             2,036       19,055 307 SR-U-3 07                     Energy                                                 -                    -              -            14,814               -              -            2,222       17,036 308 Energy Subtotal                                                       $              -  $                - $            -  $          78,408   $          - $          168 $          9,020 $      87,596 309 310 LT-U-1 24                     Environmental Permits and Fees                         2                   -            344               3,348             -              27               82         3,802 (2) 311 SNF-U-2 27                     Environmental Permits and Fees                         -                    -            676                 346             -              -              153         1,176 (2) 312 SR-U-3 23                     Environmental Permits and Fees                         -                    -            193               1,460             -              -              248         1,901 313 Environmental Permits and Fees Subtotal                               $              2   $                - $        1,212 $            5,154   $          - $            27 $            484 $      6,879 314 (2) 315 SNF-U-GW                       Ground Water Monitoring                               -                    -            340                   -            -              -                51           391 (2) 316 SR-U-GW                       Ground Water Monitoring                               -                    -            120                   -            -              -                18           138 317 Ground Water Monitoring Subtotal                                     $              -  $                - $          460 $                -  $          - $            -  $            69 $        529 318 (17) 319 LT-U-1 20                     Information Technology                             2,532               1,605         6,001               6,044             -          1,687             1,035       18,905 (17) 320 SNF-U-2 20                     Information Technology                                 -                  998         3,730                 389             -              -              768         5,885 (17) 321 SR-U-3 15                     Information Technology                                 -                1,670         2,746                 649             -              -              760         5,825 (18) 322 LT-U-1 21                     Telecommunications                                 1,275                   35           137                   88             -            815                 -        2,350 (18) 323 LT-U-1 22                     Personal Computers                                     -                    9             9                   -            -              -                -            18 (18) 324 SNF-U-2 22                     Personal Computers                                     -                    7             -                    -            -              -                -            7 325 Information Technology Subtotal                                       $          3,808   $            4,324 $      12,623 $            7,171   $          - $        2,502   $          2,563 $      32,991 326 7 Of 9
344 3,348 27 82 3,802 311 SNF-U-2 27 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 676 346 153 1,176 312 SR-U-3 23 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 193 1,460 248 1,901 313 Environmental Permits and Fees Subtotal 2
                                                                                            %
1,212 5,154 27 484 6,879 314 315 SNF-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 340 51 391 316 SR-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 120 18 138 317 Ground Water Monitoring Subtotal 460 69 529 318 319 LT-U-1 20 Information Technology (17) 2,532 1,605 6,001 6,044 1,687 1,035 18,905 320 SNF-U-2 20 Information Technology (17) 998 3,730 389 768 5,885 321 SR-U-3 15 Information Technology (17) 1,670 2,746 649 760 5,825 322 LT-U-1 21 Telecommunications (18) 1,275 35 137 88 815 2,350 323 LT-U-1 22 Personal Computers (18) 9 9
18 324 SNF-U-2 22 Personal Computers (18) 7 7
325 Information Technology Subtotal 3,808 4,324 12,623 7,171 2,502 2,563 32,991 326 7 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                  Description                                     Labor               Material       Contract           Other           Disposal     Overheads       Contingency     Total 327 LT-U-1 05                         Insurance                                                   1                   -              -            18,981             -              -            1,090       20,072 (19) 328 LT-U-1 14                         Workers Compensation Insurance                             -                    -              -                384             -              -                -          384 329 SNF-U-2 06                       Insurance                                                   -                    -              -            35,022             -              -            5,030       40,052 330 SR-U-3 04                         Insurance                                                   -                    -              -              4,533             -              -              680         5,213 331 Insurance Subtotal                                                           $              1   $                - $            -  $          58,921   $          - $            -  $          6,800 $      65,722 332 (2) 333 LT-U-Legal                       Third-Party Legal                                           -                    -          8,960               (125)           -            16             1,047         9,899 (2) 334 SNF-U-Legal                       Third-Party Legal                                           -                    -          9,533                 16             -            20             1,119       10,688 (2) 335 SR-U-Legal                       Third-Party Legal                                       (836)                   -          5,285                   6             -          (405)             505         4,555 336 Third-Party Legal Subtotal                                                   $            (836) $                - $      23,778 $            (103) $          - $        (369) $          2,671 $      25,142 337 338 LT-U-1 07                         NRC Fees                                                   -                    -              4             10,756             -            43               964       11,767 339 SNF-U-2 08                       NRC Fees                                                   -                    -            30             17,916             -              3             2,574       20,523 340 NRC Fees Subtotal                                                             $              -  $                - $          34 $          28,673   $          - $          46 $          3,538 $      32,291 341 (2) 342 LT-U-Office                       Office Space                                               -                  20         1,000                   -            -              -              153         1,173 (2) 343 SNF-U-Office                     Office Space                                               -                  356             3                   -            -              -                54           413 (2) 344 SR-U-Office                       Office Space                                               -                  104             37                   -            -              -                21           162 345 Office Space Lease Subtotal                                                   $              -  $              480 $        1,040 $                - $          - $            -  $            228 $      1,748 346 347 LT-U-1 04                         Security Related Expenses                                   -                  166           216                 249             -              2               56           690 348 SNF-U-2 05                       Security Related Expenses                                   1               1,913         6,562               1,305             -            10             1,310       11,102 349 SR-U-3 03                         Security Related Expenses                                   2                 124           323                 116             -              4               17           586 350 Security Related Expenses Subtotal                                           $              4   $            2,203 $        7,101 $            1,671 $          - $          16 $          1,383 $      12,378 351 352 SR-U-3 11                         Severance                                           104,551                     -          1,816               4,142             -          8,452             4,084     123,044 353 Severance Subtotal                                                           $        104,551   $                - $        1,816 $            4,142 $          - $        8,452 $          4,084 $    123,044 354 355 LT-U-1 06                         Site Lease and Easement Expenses                           1                   -            69               4,102             -              -              350         4,521 356 SNF-U-2 07                       Site Lease and Easement Expenses                           -                    -              -            41,587             -              -            6,238       47,825 357 SR-U-3 05                         Site Lease and Easement Expenses                           2                   -            223             43,225             -              -            5,348       48,798 358 Site Lease and Easement Expenses Subtotal                                     $              3   $                - $          292 $          88,914   $          - $            -  $        11,936 $    101,145 359 (2) 360 SNF-U-SFL                         Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE                     -                    -        28,320                   -            -              -            4,248       32,568 361 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE Subtotal                               $              -  $                - $      28,320 $                - $          - $            -  $          4,248 $      32,568 362 363 LT-U-1 19                         Tools and Equipment                                         -                    -            14                 35             -              -                -            49 364 Tools and Equipment Subtotal                                                 $              -  $                - $          14 $              35 $          - $            -  $              - $          49 365 (20) 366 LT-U-1 18                         Water                                                       -                    -              -              3,890             -              9               436         4,336 (20) 367 SNF-U-2 18                       Water                                                       -                    -              -              8,275             -              6             1,119         9,400 (20) 368 SR-U-3 13                         Water                                                       -                    -              -              2,965             -              -              443         3,408 369 Water Subtotal                                                               $              -  $                - $            -  $          15,130   $          - $          15 $          1,998 $      17,143 370 371 LT-U-1 02                         Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies                       -                  114         1,012                 28             -              8               21         1,183 372 SNF-U-2 02                       Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies                       -                  152         2,305                 46             -            13               127         2,643 373 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Subtotal                               $              -  $              266 $        3,317 $              74 $          - $          21 $            148 $      3,825 374 375 Non-Labor Subtotal                                                           $        108,987   $          30,189 $      274,329 $        374,880   $          - $      11,432 $        80,859 $    880,676 8 Of 9
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 327 LT-U-1 05 Insurance 1
                                                                                                    %
18,981 1,090 20,072 328 LT-U-1 14 Workers Compensation Insurance (19) 384 384 329 SNF-U-2 06 Insurance 35,022 5,030 40,052 330 SR-U-3 04 Insurance 4,533 680 5,213 331 Insurance Subtotal 1
58,921 6,800 65,722 332 333 LT-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 8,960 (125) 16 1,047 9,899 334 SNF-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 9,533 16 20 1,119 10,688 335 SR-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal (836) 5,285 6
(405) 505 4,555 336 Third-Party Legal Subtotal (836) 23,778 (103)
(369) 2,671 25,142 337 338 LT-U-1 07 NRC Fees 4
10,756 43 964 11,767 339 SNF-U-2 08 NRC Fees 30 17,916 3
2,574 20,523 340 NRC Fees Subtotal 34 28,673 46 3,538 32,291 341 342 LT-U-Office (2) Office Space 20 1,000 153 1,173 343 SNF-U-Office (2) Office Space 356 3
54 413 344 SR-U-Office (2) Office Space 104 37 21 162 345 Office Space Lease Subtotal 480 1,040 228 1,748 346 347 LT-U-1 04 Security Related Expenses 166 216 249 2
56 690 348 SNF-U-2 05 Security Related Expenses 1
1,913 6,562 1,305 10 1,310 11,102 349 SR-U-3 03 Security Related Expenses 2
124 323 116 4
17 586 350 Security Related Expenses Subtotal 4
2,203 7,101 1,671 16 1,383 12,378 351 352 SR-U-3 11 Severance 104,551 1,816 4,142 8,452 4,084 123,044 353 Severance Subtotal 104,551 1,816 4,142 8,452 4,084 123,044 354 355 LT-U-1 06 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 1
69 4,102 350 4,521 356 SNF-U-2 07 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 41,587 6,238 47,825 357 SR-U-3 05 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 2
223 43,225 5,348 48,798 358 Site Lease and Easement Expenses Subtotal 3
292 88,914 11,936 101,145 359 360 SNF-U-SFL (2) Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 28,320 4,248 32,568 361 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE Subtotal 28,320 4,248 32,568 362 363 LT-U-1 19 Tools and Equipment 14 35 49 364 Tools and Equipment Subtotal 14 35 49 365 366 LT-U-1 18 Water (20) 3,890 9
436 4,336 367 SNF-U-2 18 Water (20) 8,275 6
1,119 9,400 368 SR-U-3 13 Water (20) 2,965 443 3,408 369 Water Subtotal 15,130 15 1,998 17,143 370 371 LT-U-1 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 114 1,012 28 8
21 1,183 372 SNF-U-2 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 152 2,305 46 13 127 2,643 373 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Subtotal 266 3,317 74 21 148 3,825 374 375 Non-Labor Subtotal 108,987 30,189 274,329 374,880 11,432 80,859 880,676 8 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
Total (Nominal / 2017$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.              Description                   Labor               Material       Contract           Other           Disposal     Overheads     Contingency     Total 376 377 Service Level Agreements (2) 378 LT-U-SLA                       Service Level Agreements           32,318                   (9)         2,301             30,114             -          9,098           6,278       80,099 (2) 379 SNF-U-SLA                     Service Level Agreements             7,908                   (9)         2,080               9,175             -        25,896           3,521       48,571 (2) 380 SR-U-SLA                       Service Level Agreements             9,783                   (1)           132               8,254             -        26,401           4,403       48,973 381 Service Level Agreements Subtotal                       $          50,010   $              (19) $        4,514 $          47,543   $          - $      61,395 $        14,202 $    177,643 382 383 DGC Staffing 384                                                                         -                    -                                  -            -              -
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 376 377 Service Level Agreements 378 LT-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 32,318 (9) 2,301 30,114 9,098 6,278 80,099 379 SNF-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 7,908 (9) 2,080 9,175 25,896 3,521 48,571 380 SR-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 9,783 (1) 132 8,254 26,401 4,403 48,973 381 Service Level Agreements Subtotal 50,010 (19) 4,514 47,543 61,395 14,202 177,643 382 383 DGC Staffing 384 385 386 Subtotal DGC Staffing 387 388 Undistributed Subtotal 389 390 Total 9 Of 9
385                                                                         -                    -                                  -            -              -
%
386 Subtotal DGC Staffing                                   $              -  $                -  $              $                -  $          - $            - $                $
387 388 Undistributed Subtotal                                 $                  $                  $              $                  $          - $              $                $
389 390 Total                                                   $                  $                  $              $                  $            $              $                $
9 Of 9
                                                                              %


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                  Description                                                                       Labor           Material       Contract         Other             Disposal     Overheads       Contingency     Total 1 Completed Projects - 2015 NDCTP                                                                               $          1,236 $          2,663 $        88,707 $            (134) $          - $        1,569 $              - $    94,041 2
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 1
3 LT-2-D-2 18                       Planning & Design For Cold and Dark                                                     1,887             1,008         14,875             1,067             -          1,372                 -      20,208 4 LT-2-D-2 19                       Implement Cold and Dark (Repower Site)                                                 2,083               412         50,494               (458)             -          1,479                 -      54,010 5 LT-2-D-2 20                       Install 12 kV Service Line to Power Temp Power Ring                                     1,535             2,746           4,617               413             -            738                 -      10,050 6 LT-2-D-2 21                       Drain & De-Energize Non-Essential Systems (DEC Process)                                 2,343               946           1,288                 16             -          1,477                 -        6,070 7 LT-2-D-2 29                       Implement Control Room Modifications (Command Center Relocation)                           -                  4           332                   3             -              3                 -          343 8 Completed Activities - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal                                                       $          7,849 $          5,116 $        71,606 $            1,041 $            - $        5,069 $                - $    90,680 9
Completed Projects - 2015 NDCTP 1,236 2,663 88,707 (134) 1,569 94,041 2
10 LT-2-D-2 26                       Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 2                                     136             2,795           1,125                 43             -            126                 -        4,225 11 LT-2-D-2 27                       Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 3                                     136             2,795           1,125                 43             -            126                 -        4,225 12 Completed Activities - Spent Fuel Islanding Subtotal                                                         $              272 $          5,589 $        2,251 $              85 $            - $          253 $              - $      8,450 13 14 LT-2-D-2 07                       Prepare Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR)                                             1               -            1,946                 11             -              20               -          1,978 15 Completed Activities - Phase 2 Regulatory Compliance Subtotal                                                 $              1 $            -  $        1,946 $              11 $            - $            20 $            -  $      1,978 16 17 LT-2-D-2 22                       Select Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC)                                         1,179                 7         11,471               406             -            784                 -      13,847 18 Completed Activities - DCG RFP & Prep Subtotal                                                               $          1,179 $              7 $      11,471 $              406   $          - $          784 $            -  $    13,847 19 (2) 20 LT-2-D-LOED                       Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification                                               66             1,054             171                 (3)           -              49                 -        1,337 (2) 21 LT-D-SPV                         Special Purpose Vehicle Support                                                             -                -            424                   1             -              5                 -          430 (2) 22 LT-3-D-RecB                       Records Backlog                                                                             -                -          1,733               183             -              19                 -        1,936 (2) 23 LT-3-D-S&S                       Simplification & Streamlining Project                                                       1                 6         1,262                 50             -              7                 -        1,325 24 Completed Activities - Transition Modifications Subtotal                                                     $              67 $          1,060 $        3,589 $              230 $            - $            81 $              - $      5,027 25 26 Completed Projects And Activities Subtotal                                                                   $          10,603 $        14,435 $      179,568 $            1,640 $            - $        7,776 $                - $    214,024 27 28 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations (3) 29 SNF-1-D-7 02                     Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure                                         95           16,219         30,966           (12,666)             -            438               986       36,039 30 SNF-2-D-8 07                     ISFSI Pad Study                                                                             -                -            199                   2             -              2                 -          203 (4) 31 SNF-2-D-8 08                     Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight                                 1,219               102         72,413             2,808             -            879             3,450       80,871 32 SNF-2-D-8 09                     Construct ISFSI Expansion                                                                 92                 5         42,362               263             -            170             4,061       46,953 (5) 33 SNF-2-D-8 10                     Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 2                                               24             1,696         25,947             9,012             -            563               305       37,547 (5) 34 SNF-2-D-8 11                     Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 3                                               23             1,696         18,782             8,943             -            487               508       30,439 (6) 35 SNF-2-D-8 12                     Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 2                                   -                -        16,574                 (1)           -                -            2,505       19,078 (6) 36 SNF-2-D-8 13                     Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 3                                   -                -        16,574                   -            -                -            2,505       19,079 37 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Subtotal                                                                     $          1,453 $          19,719 $      223,817 $            8,362 $            - $        2,540 $          14,321 $    270,210 38 39 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 40                                   Prepare Integrated Work Sequence and Schedule for Decommissioning                           -                -                                  -            -                -
3 LT-2-D-2 18 Planning & Design For Cold and Dark 1,887 1,008 14,875 1,067 1,372 20,208 4
41                                   Modify Containment Access- Unit 2                                                           -                  -                                  -            -              -
LT-2-D-2 19 Implement Cold and Dark (Repower Site) 2,083 412 50,494 (458) 1,479 54,010 5
42                                   Modify Containment Access- Unit 3                                                           -                  -                                  -            -              -
LT-2-D-2 20 Install 12 kV Service Line to Power Temp Power Ring 1,535 2,746 4,617 413 738 10,050 6
43                                   Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 2                                             -                  -                                  -                            -
LT-2-D-2 21 Drain & De-Energize Non-Essential Systems (DEC Process) 2,343 946 1,288 16 1,477 6,070 7
44                                   Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 2                                                 -                  -                                  -                            -
LT-2-D-2 29 Implement Control Room Modifications (Command Center Relocation) 4 332 3
45                                   Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 3                                             -                  -                                  -                            -
3 343 8
46                                   Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 3                                                 -                  -                                  -                            -
Completed Activities - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 7,849 5,116 71,606 1,041 5,069 90,680 9
47                                   Prepare Activity Specifications - U2                                                       -                  -                                  -            -              -
10 LT-2-D-2 26 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 2 136 2,795 1,125 43 126 4,225 11 LT-2-D-2 27 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 3 136 2,795 1,125 43 126 4,225 12 Completed Activities - Spent Fuel Islanding Subtotal 272 5,589 2,251 85 253 8,450 13 14 LT-2-D-2 07 Prepare Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR) 1 1,946 11 20 1,978 15 Completed Activities - Phase 2 Regulatory Compliance Subtotal 1
(2) 48                                  Waste Contracts                                                                             -                -                                  -            -                -
1,946 11 20 1,978 16 17 LT-2-D-2 22 Select Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) 1,179 7
49                                   Install GARDIAN System                                                                     -                  -                                  -            -              -
11,471 406 784 13,847 18 Completed Activities - DCG RFP & Prep Subtotal 1,179 7
50 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal                                     $              - $                - $              $                - $            $            - $                $
11,471 406 784 13,847 19 20 LT-2-D-LOED (2) Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification 66 1,054 171 (3) 49 1,337 21 LT-D-SPV (2) Special Purpose Vehicle Support 424 1
1 Of 9
5 430 22 LT-3-D-RecB (2) Records Backlog 1,733 183 19 1,936 23 LT-3-D-S&S (2) Simplification & Streamlining Project 1
                                                                                                                        %
6 1,262 50 7
1,325 24 Completed Activities - Transition Modifications Subtotal 67 1,060 3,589 230 81 5,027 25 26 Completed Projects And Activities Subtotal 10,603 14,435 179,568 1,640 7,776 214,024 27 28 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 29 SNF-1-D-7 02 Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure (3) 95 16,219 30,966 (12,666) 438 986 36,039 30 SNF-2-D-8 07 ISFSI Pad Study 199 2
2 203 31 SNF-2-D-8 08 Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight (4) 1,219 102 72,413 2,808 879 3,450 80,871 32 SNF-2-D-8 09 Construct ISFSI Expansion 92 5
42,362 263 170 4,061 46,953 33 SNF-2-D-8 10 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 2 (5) 24 1,696 25,947 9,012 563 305 37,547 34 SNF-2-D-8 11 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 3 (5) 23 1,696 18,782 8,943 487 508 30,439 35 SNF-2-D-8 12 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 2 (6) 16,574 (1) 2,505 19,078 36 SNF-2-D-8 13 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 3 (6) 16,574 2,505 19,079 37 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Subtotal 1,453 19,719 223,817 8,362 2,540 14,321 270,210 38 39 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 40 Prepare Integrated Work Sequence and Schedule for Decommissioning 41 Modify Containment Access-Unit 2 42 Modify Containment Access-Unit 3 43 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 2 44 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 2 45 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 3 46 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 3 47 Prepare Activity Specifications - U2 48 (2) Waste Contracts 49 Install GARDIAN System 50 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 1 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                Description                                                                     Labor           Material     Contract       Other           Disposal       Overheads     Contingency   Total 51 52                               Design, Specify, and Procure Special Items and Materials                                   -                -                              -            -                -
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 51 52 Design, Specify, and Procure Special Items and Materials 53 Test Special Cutting and Handling Equipment and Train Operators 54 Finalize Internals and Vessel Segmenting Details - Unit 2 55 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 2 56 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 3 57 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Internals and Vessel Segmentation Subtotal 58 59 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 2 60 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 3 61 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 2 62 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 3 63 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 2 64 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 3 65 Remove Protected Area Security Fencing 66 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Removal Of Spent Fuel Systems/Equipment Subtotal 67 68 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 2 69 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 3 70 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Steam Generator Removal Subtotal 71 72 Upgrade Rail Spur 73 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 2 74 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 3 75 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Non-Essential System Removal Subtotal 76 77 Remove, Package and Dispose of Essential Systems 78 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 2 79 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 2 80 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 3 81 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 3 82 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 2 83 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 3 84 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 2 85 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 3 86 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Large Component Removal Subtotal 87 88 Demolish Service Building (K-10, 20, 30) 89 Demolish South Security Processing Facility (K-70) 90 Demolish South Yard Area Buildings T-10, 20, 60 and Haz Mat 91 Procure Clean Building Demolition Equipment 92 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 3 93 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 2 94 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 2 95 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 2 96 Demolish AWS Building 97 Demolish Building L-50 2 Of 9
53                               Test Special Cutting and Handling Equipment and Train Operators                             -                -                              -            -                -
%
54                               Finalize Internals and Vessel Segmenting Details - Unit 2                                   -                -                              -            -                -
55                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 2                                 -                -                              -                              -
56                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 3                                 -                -                              -                              -
57 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Internals and Vessel Segmentation Subtotal                     $                - $              - $          $                - $              $            - $            $
58 59                                 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 2                                                   -                -                              -            -                -
60                               Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 3                                                     -                -                              -            -                -
61                               Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 2                                     -                -                              -                              -
62                               Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 3                                     -                -                              -                            -
63                               Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 2                                   -                -                              -            -                -
64                               Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 3                                   -                -                              -            -                -
65                               Remove Protected Area Security Fencing                                                     -                -                              -            -                -
66 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Removal Of Spent Fuel Systems/Equipment Subtotal               $              - $              - $          $                - $              $            - $              $
67 68                               Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 2                                           -                -                              -                              -
69                               Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 3                                           -                -                              -                              -
70 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Steam Generator Removal Subtotal                             $                - $              - $          $                - $              $            - $              $
71 72                               Upgrade Rail Spur                                                                           -                -                              -            -                -
73                               Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 2                               -                -                              -                              -
74                               Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 3                               -                -                              -                              -
75 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Non-Essential System Removal Subtotal                           $              - $              - $          $                - $              $            - $              $
76 77                               Remove, Package and Dispose of Essential Systems                                           -                -                              -                              -
78                               Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 2                                   -                -                              -                              -
79                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 2                           -                -                              -                              -
80                                 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 3                                   -                -                              -                              -
81                               Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 3                           -                -                              -                              -
82                               Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 2                                                 -                -                              -                              -
83                               Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 3                                                 -                -                              -                              -
84                               Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 2                                       -                -                              -                              -
85                               Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 3                                       -                -                              -                              -
86 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Large Component Removal Subtotal                               $              - $              - $          $                - $              $            - $              $
87 88                               Demolish Service Building (K-10, 20, 30)                                                   -                -                              -                              -
89                               Demolish South Security Processing Facility (K-70)                                         -                -                              -                              -
90                               Demolish South Yard Area Buildings T-10, 20, 60 and Haz Mat                               -                -                              -                              -
91                               Procure Clean Building Demolition Equipment                                               -                -                              -            -                -
92                               Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 3                                               -                  -                              -                              -
93                               Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 2                                                 -                -                              -                              -
94                               Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 2                                 -                -                              -                              -
95                               Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 2                                     -                -                              -                              -
96                               Demolish AWS Building                                                                     -                -                              -                              -
97                               Demolish Building L-50                                                                     -                -                              -                              -
2 Of 9
                                                                                                                      %


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                  Description                                                                   Labor           Material     Contract     Other           Disposal     Overheads     Contingency   Total 98                                 Demolish Maintenance Building 4 (B-64/B-65)                                             -                -                            -                            -
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 98 Demolish Maintenance Building 4 (B-64/B-65) 99 Demolish Maintenance Building 5 (B-62/B-63) 100 Demolish Outage Control Center 101 Demolish Maintenance Building 2 (B-49/B-50) 102 Demolish Maintenance Building 1 (B-43/B-44) 103 Demolish Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 104 Demolish Auxiliary Control Building - Common 105 Remove Systems and Demolish Make-Up Demineralizer Structures 106 Install Concrete Plugs in Intake and Discharge Structures 107 Demolish Intake and Discharge Structures to 3-Feet Below Grade 108 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial Plant Building Demo Subtotal 109 110 Decon Containment Building - Unit 3 111 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 3 112 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 113 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 3 114 Decon Containment Building - Unit 2 115 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 2 116 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 2 117 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 2 118 Decon Turbine Building - Unit 2 119 Decon Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 120 Decon Auxiliary Control Building - Common 121 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Building Decontamination Subtotal 122 123 Remove Protected Area Pavement 124 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 3 125 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 3 126 Demolish Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 127 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 3 128 Demolish Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 129 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 2 130 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Plant Building Demo Subtotal 131 132 (2) Offshore Conduit Diffuser and Risers 133 134 (2) Backfill 135 136 Demolish Staging Warehouse 137 Demolish Administration Building (K-40/50) 138 Detension and Remove Unit 3 Containment Building Tendons 139 Demolish Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 140 Demolish Unit 3 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 141 Detension and Remove Unit 2 Containment Building Tendons 142 Demolish Safety and MSIV Equipment Building - Unit 2 143 Demolish Unit 2 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 144 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Containment Building Demo Subtotal 145 3 Of 9
99                               Demolish Maintenance Building 5 (B-62/B-63)                                             -                -                            -                            -
%
100                               Demolish Outage Control Center                                                           -                -                            -                            -
101                               Demolish Maintenance Building 2 (B-49/B-50)                                             -                -                            -                            -
102                               Demolish Maintenance Building 1 (B-43/B-44)                                             -                -                            -                            -
103                                 Demolish Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common                                           -                -                            -                            -
104                                 Demolish Auxiliary Control Building - Common                                             -                -                            -                            -
105                                 Remove Systems and Demolish Make-Up Demineralizer Structures                             -                -                            -                            -
106                                 Install Concrete Plugs in Intake and Discharge Structures                               -                -                            -            -              -
107                                 Demolish Intake and Discharge Structures to 3-Feet Below Grade                         -                -                            -                            -
108 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial Plant Building Demo Subtotal                         $              - $              - $          $              - $              $          - $              $
109 110                                 Decon Containment Building - Unit 3                                                     -                -                            -                            -
111                                 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 3                                                     -                -                            -                            -
112                                 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3                                       -                -                            -                            -
113                                 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 3                                                   -                -                            -                            -
114                                 Decon Containment Building - Unit 2                                                     -                -                            -                            -
115                                 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 2                                                     -                -                            -                            -
116                                 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 2                                       -                -                            -                            -
117                                 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 2                                                   -                -                            -                            -
118                                 Decon Turbine Building - Unit 2                                                         -                -                            -                            -
119                               Decon Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common                                               -                -                            -                            -
120                               Decon Auxiliary Control Building - Common                                               -                -                            -                            -
121 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Building Decontamination Subtotal                           $                - $              - $          $                - $            $            - $            $
122 123                                 Remove Protected Area Pavement                                                           -                -                            -                            -
124                                 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 3                               -                -                            -                            -
125                                 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 3                                   -                -                            -                            -
126                                 Demolish Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                           -                -                            -                            -
127                                 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 3                                                 -                -                            -                            -
128                                 Demolish Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                           -                -                            -                            -
129                                 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 2                                                 -                -                            -                            -
130 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Plant Building Demo Subtotal                           $              - $              - $          $              - $              $          - $              $
131 (2) 132                                  Offshore Conduit Diffuser and Risers                                                     -                -                            -            -              -
133 (2) 134                                Backfill                                                                                 -                -                            -            -              -
135 136                               Demolish Staging Warehouse                                                               -                -                            -                          -
137                               Demolish Administration Building (K-40/50)                                               -                -                            -                            -
138                               Detension and Remove Unit 3 Containment Building Tendons                                 -                -                            -                            -
139                               Demolish Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3                                     -                -                            -                            -
140                                 Demolish Unit 3 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                               -                -                            -                            -
141                                 Detension and Remove Unit 2 Containment Building Tendons                                 -                -                            -                            -
142                                 Demolish Safety and MSIV Equipment Building - Unit 2                                     -                -                            -                            -
143                                 Demolish Unit 2 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade                             -                -                            -                            -
144 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Containment Building Demo Subtotal                           $              - $              - $          $              - $              $          - $              $
145 3 Of 9
                                                                                                                    %


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                Description                                                                 Labor           Material       Contract         Other           Disposal     Overheads       Contingency     Total 146                               Prepare License Termination Plan                                                       -                -                                -            -              -
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 146 Prepare License Termination Plan 147 Final Status Survey 148 Subsurface Structure Removal Engineering Planning and Design 149 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Survey/License Termination Subtotal 150 151 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 152 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 153 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Waste Subtotal 154 155 156 157 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal Subtotal 158 159 Other Projects 160 SNF-2-D-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Relicensing (7) 11,763 7
147                               Final Status Survey                                                                   -                -                                -                            -
2,346 14,117 161 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1 (2) Holtec ISFSI I&M Program Development (7) 13,964 24 3
148                               Subsurface Structure Removal Engineering Planning and Design                           -                -                                -            -              -
2,733 16,724 162 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 2 (2) Holtec ISFSI Relicensing 4,686 961 5,647 163 ISFSI Aging Management Subtotal 30,414 32 3
149 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Survey/License Termination Subtotal                   $              - $              - $              $                - $            $            - $                $
6,040 36,489 164 165 SNF-2-D-EP Holtec (2) Environmental Permitting - Holtec 2,812 577 3,388 166 SNF-2-D-EP Areva (2) Environmental Permitting - Areva 1,546 317 1,864 167 Coastal Development Permit Extension Subtotal 4,358 894 5,252 168 169 SNF-2-D-GTCC (2) GTCC Waste Storage 21,197 5,435 26,632 170 171 SR-1-D-14 01 Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender (8) 494 6,784 27 163 1,075 8,542 172 SR-1-D-14 02 Disposition Hazardous Waste from Mesa Site 113 9
150 (2) 151                                Waste Taxes (Pass Through)                                                             -                -              -                  -                            -
73 195 173 SR-1-D-14 03 Mesa Site Characterization Survey 15 133 (102) 10 56 174 SR-2-D-15 02 Obtain Required Permits - Mesa (9) 54 26 1
(2) 152                                Waste Taxes (Pass Through)                                                             -                -              -                  -                            -
81 175 SR-2-D-15 09 Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance (10) 254 42 8,558 62 97 524 9,537 176 SR-2-D-15 11 Demolish Mesa Roads and Parking Lots 381 554 190 1,125 177 SR-2-D-15 12 Finish Grading and Re-vegetate Mesa Site 385 285 135 805 178 Mesa Site Turnover Subtotal 875 807 16,377 14 344 1,923 20,341 179 180 LT-3-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 2,046 360 181 2,588 181 SNF-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 937 144 1,081 182 DCE Update Subtotal 2,983 360 326 3,669 183 184 SR-3-D-16 05 Obtain CEQA Permit & Approvals (11) 902 15 5,573 325 414 685 7,914 185 SR-3-D-16 03 Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal and Plant Easement (12) 2,231 8,836 616 607 2,137 14,427 186 SR-D-NEPA 2 (2) Plant Lease Extension 1,309 1,477 43 388 660 3,878 187 SR-D-NEPA 3 (2) Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration 1,558 5,185 52 462 1,488 8,745 188 SNF-D-GTCC Disp (2) GTCC Disposal 33,741 6,921 40,662 189 SNF-2-D-CDP (2) ISFSI CDP Settlement 3,508 769 4,277 190 SR-D-RFP (2) Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 4,444 56 1,318 1,193 7,011 191 SNF-1-D-7 05 Cyber Security Modifications 337 670 7,959 81 332 9,380 192 SNF-D-NIA Sump (2) NIA Sump Modifications 937 144 1,081 193 Other Projects Subtotal 11,657 1,549 142,546 2,293 3,868 27,845 189,758 194 4 Of 9
153 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Waste Subtotal                                             $              - $              - $            - $                - $            $            - $                $
%
154 155                                                                                                                       -                -                                -            -              -
156 157 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal Subtotal                                                     $              - $              - $              $                - $            $            - $                $
158 159 Other Projects (2)                                                                  (7) 160 SNF-2-D-AM Areva               Areva ISFSI Relicensing                                                               -                -        11,763                 7           -              -            2,346       14,117 (2)                                                                  (7) 161 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1           Holtec ISFSI I&M Program Development                                                   -                -        13,964                 24           -              3           2,733       16,724 (2) 162 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 2           Holtec ISFSI Relicensing                                                               -                -          4,686                 -            -              -              961         5,647 163 ISFSI Aging Management Subtotal                                                                       $              - $              - $      30,414 $              32 $          - $            3 $          6,040 $    36,489 164 (2) 165 SNF-2-D-EP Holtec             Environmental Permitting - Holtec                                                     -                -          2,812                 -            -              -              577         3,388 (2) 166 SNF-2-D-EP Areva               Environmental Permitting - Areva                                                       -                -          1,546                 -            -              -              317         1,864 167 Coastal Development Permit Extension Subtotal                                                         $              - $              - $        4,358 $                - $          - $            - $            894 $      5,252 168 (2) 169 SNF-2-D-GTCC                   GTCC Waste Storage                                                                     -                -        21,197                 -            -              -            5,435       26,632 170 (8) 171 SR-1-D-14 01                   Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender                         494                 -          6,784                 27           -            163           1,075         8,542 172 SR-1-D-14 02                   Disposition Hazardous Waste from Mesa Site                                           113                 -              9                 -            -              73               -          195 173 SR-1-D-14 03                   Mesa Site Characterization Survey                                                     15                 -            133             (102)           -              10               -            56 (9) 174 SR-2-D-15 02                   Obtain Required Permits - Mesa                                                         -                -            54                 26           -              1               -            81 (10) 175 SR-2-D-15 09                   Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance                                                   254               42         8,558                 62           -              97             524         9,537 176 SR-2-D-15 11                   Demolish Mesa Roads and Parking Lots                                                   -              381           554                 -            -              -              190         1,125 177 SR-2-D-15 12                   Finish Grading and Re-vegetate Mesa Site                                               -              385           285                 -            -              -              135           805 178 Mesa Site Turnover Subtotal                                                                           $            875 $            807 $      16,377 $              14 $          - $          344 $          1,923 $    20,341 179 (2) 180 LT-3-D-DCE                     DCE Update                                                                             -                -          2,046               360             -              -              181         2,588 (2) 181 SNF-D-DCE                     DCE Update                                                                             -                -            937                 -            -              -              144         1,081 182 DCE Update Subtotal                                                                                   $              - $              - $        2,983 $            360 $          - $            - $            326 $      3,669 183 (11) 184 SR-3-D-16 05                   Obtain CEQA Permit & Approvals                                                       902               15         5,573               325             -            414             685         7,914 (12) 185 SR-3-D-16 03                   Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal and Plant Easement                       2,231                 -          8,836               616             -            607           2,137       14,427 (2) 186 SR-D-NEPA 2                   Plant Lease Extension                                                             1,309                 -          1,477                 43           -            388             660         3,878 (2) 187 SR-D-NEPA 3                   Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration                                   1,558                 -          5,185                 52           -            462           1,488         8,745 (2) 188 SNF-D-GTCC Disp               GTCC Disposal                                                                         -                -        33,741                 -            -              -            6,921       40,662 (2) 189 SNF-2-D-CDP                   ISFSI CDP Settlement                                                                   -                -          3,508               769             -              -                -        4,277 (2) 190 SR-D-RFP                       Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement                                       4,444               56             -                  -            -          1,318           1,193         7,011 191 SNF-1-D-7 05                   Cyber Security Modifications                                                         337               670         7,959                 81           -            332               -        9,380 (2) 192 SNF-D-NIA Sump                 NIA Sump Modifications                                                                 -                -            937                 -            -              -              144         1,081 193 Other Projects Subtotal                                                                               $          11,657 $          1,549 $      142,546 $          2,293 $          - $        3,868 $          27,845 $    189,758 194 4 Of 9
                                                                                                                  %


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.              Description                                                                                 Labor           Material       Contract         Other           Disposal       Overheads       Contingency     Total 195 Substructure Removal (2) 196 SR-D-BKFL REM                 Backfill Removal                                                                                   3,147             2,608             -                -                -            933           1,698         8,386 197 SR-5-D-18 02                 Install Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring                                                           -            19,594         9,635                 -                -              -            7,369       36,599 198 SR-5-D-18 03                 Install Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment and Discharge Controls                               -                -              -            27,926               -              -            6,981       34,907 199 SR-5-D-18 04                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet                                     -              280           194                 -              533               -              256         1,264 200 SR-5-D-18 05                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet                                   -              159           111                 -              259               -              135           664 201 SR-5-D-18 06                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet                                     -              431           322                 -              879               -              416         2,048 202 SR-5-D-18 07                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet                               -            1,137           995                 -          1,705               -              976         4,813 203 SR-5-D-18 08                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation                           -            5,165         4,219                 -          7,386               -            4,267       21,037 204 SR-5-D-18 09                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet                                   -              809           776                 -          3,861               -            1,391         6,838 205 SR-5-D-18 10                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet                                           -              379           303                 -              751               -              365         1,798 206 SR-5-D-18 11                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet                                         -              143             98                 -              240               -              122           603 207 SR-5-D-18 12                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Containment Building Below -3 Feet                                       -            1,719         1,272                 -          4,731               -            1,969         9,692 208 SR-5-D-18 13                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet                                     -              280           194                 -              533               -              256         1,264 209 SR-5-D-18 14                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet                                   -              159           111                 -              259               -              135           664 210 SR-5-D-18 15                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet                                     -              431           322                 -              879               -              416         2,048 211 SR-5-D-18 16                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet                               -            1,233         1,030                 -          1,705               -            1,009         4,976 212 SR-5-D-18 17                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation                           -            5,165         4,219                 -          7,386               -            4,267       21,038 213 SR-5-D-18 18                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet                                   -              809           776                 -          3,861               -            1,391         6,838 214 SR-5-D-18 19                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet                                           -              379           303                 -              751               -              365         1,798 215 SR-5-D-18 20                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet                                         -              390           232                 -              240               -              219         1,081 216 SR-5-D-18 21                 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Containment Building Below -3 Feet                                       -            1,716         1,271                 -            4,731               -            1,968         9,686 217 SR-5-D-18 22                 Demolish and Backfill Intake Structure Below -3 Feet                                                   -            10,013         7,373                 -          23,749               -          10,483       51,618 218 SR-5-D-18 24                 Remove Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring                                                             -                -        11,216                 -                -              -            2,876       14,091 219 SR-5-D-18 25                 Remove Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment                                                       -                -              -            6,678               -              -            1,669         8,347 220 SR-6-D-19 06                 Remove and Stockpile Existing Seawall Erosion Protection                                               -                10             5                 -                -              -                4           20 221 SR-6-D-19 07                 Remove Unit 2 and 3 Seawall and Pedestrian Walkway                                                     -            2,914         2,826               (38)         4,606               -            2,618       12,927 222 SR-6-D-19 08                 Remove Remaining Intake and Outfall Box Culvert                                                       -              446           210               (18)         2,211               -              725         3,574 223 SR-6-D-19 10                 Backfill and Compaction of Excavation                                                                 -            2,131         1,401                 -                -              -              892         4,424 224 Substructure Removal Subtotal                                                                                       $          3,147 $          58,501 $      49,416 $          34,547 $      71,258 $          933 $        55,239 $    273,042 225 226 Offshore Conduit Removal 227 SR-3-D-16 01                 Hydrogeologic Investigation and Outfall Conduit Survey                                                 -              125           283               100               -              -              129           637 228 SR-5-D-18 23                 Remove Off Shore Intake and Outfall Conduits                                                           -            42,198         10,838             (163)         19,788               -          18,334       90,995 229 Offshore Conduit Removal Subtotal                                                                                   $              - $          42,323 $      11,121 $            (63) $      19,788 $            - $        18,463 $      91,631 230 231 ISFSI Demolition 232 SNF D&D-1-D-12 01             Preparation and NRC Review of License Termination Plan                                                 -                -            111               155               -              -              67           333 233 SNF D&D-2-D-13 01             Install GARDIAN Bulk Assay System                                                                     -                -              -              525               -              -              131           656 (13) 234 SNF D&D-2-D-13 02             Decon Areva Modules                                                                                   -                45           104                 -              136               -              72           357 235 SNF D&D-2-D-13 03             Final Status Survey of ISFSI                                                                           -                78           488                 -                -              -              145           711 (14) 236 SNF D&D-2-D-13 04             Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules                                                             -            1,009         1,802                 -          1,190               -            1,019         5,020 (15) 237 SNF D&D-2-D-13 05             Demolish ISFSI Security Building                                                                       -              255           186                 -              495               -              238         1,174 238 SNF D&D-2-D-13 06             Restore ISFSI Site                                                                                     -              492           325                 -                -              -              206         1,023 239 SNF D&D-2-D-13 07             Preparation of Final Report on Decommissioning and NRC Review                                         -                -            52                 -                -              -              13           65 (2) 240 SNF D&D-2-D-13 08             Clean Demo of Holtec ISFSI Pad and Modules                                                             -            1,871         1,361                 -          4,602               -            1,997         9,831 241 ISFSI Demolition Subtotal                                                                                           $              - $          3,750 $        4,429 $            680 $        6,423 $            - $          3,889 $      19,171 242 5 Of 9
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 195 Substructure Removal 196 SR-D-BKFL REM (2) Backfill Removal 3,147 2,608 933 1,698 8,386 197 SR-5-D-18 02 Install Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 19,594 9,635 7,369 36,599 198 SR-5-D-18 03 Install Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment and Discharge Controls 27,926 6,981 34,907 199 SR-5-D-18 04 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 280 194 533 256 1,264 200 SR-5-D-18 05 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 159 111 259 135 664 201 SR-5-D-18 06 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 431 322 879 416 2,048 202 SR-5-D-18 07 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,137 995 1,705 976 4,813 203 SR-5-D-18 08 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,165 4,219 7,386 4,267 21,037 204 SR-5-D-18 09 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 809 776 3,861 1,391 6,838 205 SR-5-D-18 10 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 379 303 751 365 1,798 206 SR-5-D-18 11 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 143 98 240 122 603 207 SR-5-D-18 12 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,719 1,272 4,731 1,969 9,692 208 SR-5-D-18 13 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 280 194 533 256 1,264 209 SR-5-D-18 14 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 159 111 259 135 664 210 SR-5-D-18 15 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 431 322 879 416 2,048 211 SR-5-D-18 16 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,233 1,030 1,705 1,009 4,976 212 SR-5-D-18 17 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,165 4,219 7,386 4,267 21,038 213 SR-5-D-18 18 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 809 776 3,861 1,391 6,838 214 SR-5-D-18 19 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 379 303 751 365 1,798 215 SR-5-D-18 20 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 390 232 240 219 1,081 216 SR-5-D-18 21 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,716 1,271 4,731 1,968 9,686 217 SR-5-D-18 22 Demolish and Backfill Intake Structure Below -3 Feet 10,013 7,373 23,749 10,483 51,618 218 SR-5-D-18 24 Remove Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 11,216 2,876 14,091 219 SR-5-D-18 25 Remove Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment 6,678 1,669 8,347 220 SR-6-D-19 06 Remove and Stockpile Existing Seawall Erosion Protection 10 5
                                                                                                                                %
4 20 221 SR-6-D-19 07 Remove Unit 2 and 3 Seawall and Pedestrian Walkway 2,914 2,826 (38) 4,606 2,618 12,927 222 SR-6-D-19 08 Remove Remaining Intake and Outfall Box Culvert 446 210 (18) 2,211 725 3,574 223 SR-6-D-19 10 Backfill and Compaction of Excavation 2,131 1,401 892 4,424 224 Substructure Removal Subtotal 3,147 58,501 49,416 34,547 71,258 933 55,239 273,042 225 226 Offshore Conduit Removal 227 SR-3-D-16 01 Hydrogeologic Investigation and Outfall Conduit Survey 125 283 100 129 637 228 SR-5-D-18 23 Remove Off Shore Intake and Outfall Conduits 42,198 10,838 (163) 19,788 18,334 90,995 229 Offshore Conduit Removal Subtotal 42,323 11,121 (63) 19,788 18,463 91,631 230 231 ISFSI Demolition 232 SNF D&D-1-D-12 01 Preparation and NRC Review of License Termination Plan 111 155 67 333 233 SNF D&D-2-D-13 01 Install GARDIAN Bulk Assay System 525 131 656 234 SNF D&D-2-D-13 02 Decon Areva Modules (13) 45 104 136 72 357 235 SNF D&D-2-D-13 03 Final Status Survey of ISFSI 78 488 145 711 236 SNF D&D-2-D-13 04 Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules (14) 1,009 1,802 1,190 1,019 5,020 237 SNF D&D-2-D-13 05 Demolish ISFSI Security Building (15) 255 186 495 238 1,174 238 SNF D&D-2-D-13 06 Restore ISFSI Site 492 325 206 1,023 239 SNF D&D-2-D-13 07 Preparation of Final Report on Decommissioning and NRC Review 52 13 65 240 SNF D&D-2-D-13 08 (2) Clean Demo of Holtec ISFSI Pad and Modules 1,871 1,361 4,602 1,997 9,831 241 ISFSI Demolition Subtotal 3,750 4,429 680 6,423 3,889 19,171 242 5 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                Description                                                               Labor           Material       Contract         Other           Disposal       Overheads       Contingency     Total 243 Final Site Restoration 244 SR-6-D-19 01                     Obtain Required Permits and Approvals                                                 -              19             384               125               -              -              135           663 245 SR-6-D-19 03                     Procure Site Restoration Equipment                                                   -              385               -                -              -              -              96           481 246 SR-6-D-19 12                     Install Shoreline Erosion Control and Restoration Features                           -              137               9                 -              -              -              37           182 247 SR-6-D-19 13                     Remove Railroad Tracks, Rails and Ballast                                             -              33             60                 -              -              -              24           116 248 SR-6-D-19 14                     Remove Gunite Slope Protection                                                       -              348             164               (14)         1,728               -              566         2,793 249 SR-6-D-19 15                     Remove Access Roads and Parking Lots                                                 -              173             229                 -              -              -              102           503 250 SR-6-D-19 16                     Finish Grading and Re-Vegetate Site                                                 -              801             925                 -              -              -              438         2,164 251 Final Site Restoration Subtotal                                                                       $              - $          1,897 $        1,772 $            111 $        1,728 $            - $          1,397 $      6,905 252 253 Distributed Subtotal 254 255 Labor-Staffing 256 LT-U-1 01                       Utility Staff                                                                 147,700               538         95,923             1,316               -          57,551           15,777     318,805 257 SNF-U-2 01                       Utility Staff                                                                 187,798               394         37,206             1,074               -          65,874           18,060     310,406 258 SR-U-3 01                       Utility Staff                                                                   41,681               24         57,641                 66             -          10,379           10,980     120,770 259 Utility Staff Subtotal                                                                               $        377,179 $            956 $      190,770 $          2,457 $            - $      133,803 $          44,817 $    749,981 260 261 LT-U-1 03                       Security Force                                                                 11,010                 4             138                 18             -          2,128             577       13,875 262 SNF-U-2 04                       Security Force                                                                 155,557               58           2,344                 45             -        52,636           11,677     222,317 263 Security Force Subtotal                                                                               $        166,567 $            61 $        2,482 $              63 $            - $      54,764 $          12,255 $    236,192 264 265 Labor-Staffing Subtotal                                                                             $          543,746 $          1,017 $      193,252 $          2,519 $            - $      188,567 $          57,071 $    986,172 266 267 Non-Labor (2) 268 SNF-U-AM Areva                   Areva ISFSI Aging Management                                                         -                -          3,480                 -              -              -              535         4,015 (2) 269 SNF-U-AM Holtec                 Holtec ISFSI Aging Management                                                         -                -          9,747                 -              -              -            1,499       11,247 270 Aging Management Subtotal                                                                             $                - $              - $      13,227 $                - $            - $            - $          2,035 $    15,262 271 272 LT-U-1 17                       Association Fees and Expenses                                                       -                3           2,253             2,122               -              8             519         4,906 (2) 273 SNF-U-2 26                       Association Fees and Expenses                                                         -                -            198             1,767               -              -              296         2,261 (2) 274 SR-U-3 17                       Association Fees and Expenses                                                         -                -            451               762               -              -              184         1,397 275 Association Fees and Expenses Subtotal                                                               $                - $              3 $        2,903 $          4,651 $            - $            8 $            999 $      8,564 276 277 LT-U-1 15                       Community Engagement Panel                                                         382               63           2,234             4,128               -            156             653         7,615 (2) 278 SNF-U-2 25                       Community Engagement Panel                                                           -                -            24             2,345               -              -              356         2,725 (2) 279 SR-U-3 21                       Community Engagement Panel                                                           -                -              7             1,858               -              -              280         2,145 280 Community Engagement Panel Subtotal                                                                   $            382 $            63 $        2,265 $          8,332 $            - $          156 $          1,288 $    12,486 281 6 Of 9
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 243 Final Site Restoration 244 SR-6-D-19 01 Obtain Required Permits and Approvals 19 384 125 135 663 245 SR-6-D-19 03 Procure Site Restoration Equipment 385 96 481 246 SR-6-D-19 12 Install Shoreline Erosion Control and Restoration Features 137 9
                                                                                                                  %
37 182 247 SR-6-D-19 13 Remove Railroad Tracks, Rails and Ballast 33 60 24 116 248 SR-6-D-19 14 Remove Gunite Slope Protection 348 164 (14) 1,728 566 2,793 249 SR-6-D-19 15 Remove Access Roads and Parking Lots 173 229 102 503 250 SR-6-D-19 16 Finish Grading and Re-Vegetate Site 801 925 438 2,164 251 Final Site Restoration Subtotal 1,897 1,772 111 1,728 1,397 6,905 252 253 Distributed Subtotal 254 255 Labor-Staffing 256 LT-U-1 01 Utility Staff 147,700 538 95,923 1,316 57,551 15,777 318,805 257 SNF-U-2 01 Utility Staff 187,798 394 37,206 1,074 65,874 18,060 310,406 258 SR-U-3 01 Utility Staff 41,681 24 57,641 66 10,379 10,980 120,770 259 Utility Staff Subtotal 377,179 956 190,770 2,457 133,803 44,817 749,981 260 261 LT-U-1 03 Security Force 11,010 4
138 18 2,128 577 13,875 262 SNF-U-2 04 Security Force 155,557 58 2,344 45 52,636 11,677 222,317 263 Security Force Subtotal 166,567 61 2,482 63 54,764 12,255 236,192 264 265 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 543,746 1,017 193,252 2,519 188,567 57,071 986,172 266 267 Non-Labor 268 SNF-U-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Aging Management 3,480 535 4,015 269 SNF-U-AM Holtec (2) Holtec ISFSI Aging Management 9,747 1,499 11,247 270 Aging Management Subtotal 13,227 2,035 15,262 271 272 LT-U-1 17 Association Fees and Expenses 3
2,253 2,122 8
519 4,906 273 SNF-U-2 26 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 198 1,767 296 2,261 274 SR-U-3 17 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 451 762 184 1,397 275 Association Fees and Expenses Subtotal 3
2,903 4,651 8
999 8,564 276 277 LT-U-1 15 Community Engagement Panel 382 63 2,234 4,128 156 653 7,615 278 SNF-U-2 25 (2) Community Engagement Panel 24 2,345 356 2,725 279 SR-U-3 21 (2) Community Engagement Panel 7
1,858 280 2,145 280 Community Engagement Panel Subtotal 382 63 2,265 8,332 156 1,288 12,486 281 6 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
DCE No.(1)
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 282 LT-U-1 08 Contracted Services (16) 684 9,499 75,723 7,883 75 6,383 100,247 283 SNF-U-2 11 Contracted Services (16) 340 11,309 59,271 17,865 155 10,120 99,060 284 SR-U-3 06 Contracted Services (16) 18 732 19,705 2,361 17 3,300 26,134 285 SR-U-Bank (2) Bank Fees And Interest (67)
(67) 286 SR-U-Inv Adj (2) Vendor Invoice Adjustment (209)
(1)
(1)
DCE No.                Description                                      Labor            Material      Contract          Other          Disposal    Overheads        Contingency      Total (16) 282 LT-U-1 08                      Contracted Services                                      684            9,499        75,723            7,883            -              75            6,383      100,247 (16) 283 SNF-U-2 11                    Contracted Services                                      340            11,309        59,271            17,865            -            155            10,120        99,060 (16) 284 SR-U-3 06                      Contracted Services                                        18              732        19,705            2,361            -              17            3,300        26,134 (2) 285 SR-U-Bank                      Bank Fees And Interest                                      -                -              -              (67)            -              -                -          (67)
(210) 287 Contracted Services Subtotal 1,042 21,540 154,700 27,833 247 19,803 225,164 288 289 LT-U-1 09 DAW Disposal 20 20 290 SNF-U-2 12 DAW Disposal 10 10 291 DAW Disposal Subtotal 30 30 292 293 LT-U-1 25 Decommissioning Advisor 730 6,487 16 25 671 7,930 294 SNF-U-2 28 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 274 42 316 295 SR-U-3 22 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 1,432 220 1,653 296 Decommissioning Advisor Subtotal 730 8,193 16 25 934 9,899 297 298 LT-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 2,527 389 2,915 299 SR-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 699 107 806 300 DGC Executive Oversight Committee Subtotal 3,225 496 3,722 301 302 SNF-U-2 09 Emergency Preparedness Fees 22 144 43,181 89 4,905 48,341 303 Emergency Preparedness Fees Subtotal 22 144 43,181 89 4,905 48,341 304 305 LT-U-1 10 Energy 45,237 134 4,577 49,948 306 SNF-U-2 13 Energy 16,421 30 1,957 18,409 307 SR-U-3 07 Energy 14,239 2,136 16,375 308 Energy Subtotal 75,897 164 8,670 84,732 309 310 LT-U-1 24 Environmental Permits and Fees 2
(2) 286 SR-U-Inv Adj                  Vendor Invoice Adjustment                                  -                -              -              (209)            -              (1)                -          (210) 287 Contracted Services Subtotal                                               $          1,042 $          21,540 $      154,700 $          27,833 $          - $          247 $          19,803 $    225,164 288 289 LT-U-1 09                     DAW Disposal                                               -                -            20                 -            -              -                -            20 290 SNF-U-2 12                     DAW Disposal                                               -                -            10                 -            -              -                -            10 291 DAW Disposal Subtotal                                                     $              - $              - $          30 $                - $          - $            - $              - $          30 292 293 LT-U-1 25                     Decommissioning Advisor                                     -              730         6,487                 16           -              25               671         7,930 (2) 294 SNF-U-2 28                     Decommissioning Advisor                                     -                -            274                 -            -              -                42           316 (2) 295 SR-U-3 22                     Decommissioning Advisor                                     -                -          1,432                 -            -              -              220         1,653 296 Decommissioning Advisor Subtotal                                           $              - $            730 $        8,193 $              16 $          - $            25 $            934 $      9,899 297 (2) 298 LT-U-CO                       DGC Executive Oversight Committee                           -                -          2,527                 -            -              -              389         2,915 (2) 299 SR-U-CO                       DGC Executive Oversight Committee                           -                -            699                 -            -              -              107           806 300 DGC Executive Oversight Committee Subtotal                                 $              - $              - $        3,225 $                - $          - $            - $            496 $      3,722 301 302 SNF-U-2 09                     Emergency Preparedness Fees                                 -                22           144           43,181             -              89             4,905       48,341 303 Emergency Preparedness Fees Subtotal                                       $              - $              22 $          144 $          43,181 $          - $            89 $          4,905 $      48,341 304 305 LT-U-1 10                     Energy                                                     -                -              -            45,237             -            134             4,577       49,948 306 SNF-U-2 13                     Energy                                                     -                -              -            16,421             -              30             1,957       18,409 307 SR-U-3 07                     Energy                                                     -                -              -            14,239             -              -            2,136       16,375 308 Energy Subtotal                                                           $              - $              - $            - $          75,897 $          - $          164 $          8,670 $      84,732 309 310 LT-U-1 24                     Environmental Permits and Fees                             2                 -            334             3,317             -              26               79         3,758 (2) 311 SNF-U-2 27                     Environmental Permits and Fees                             -                -            633               333             -              -              147         1,114 (2) 312 SR-U-3 23                     Environmental Permits and Fees                             -                -            181             1,403             -              -              238         1,822 313 Environmental Permits and Fees Subtotal                                   $              2 $              - $        1,149 $          5,053 $          - $            26 $            465 $      6,695 314 (2) 315 SNF-U-GW                       Ground Water Monitoring                                     -                -            319                 -            -              -                49           368 (2) 316 SR-U-GW                       Ground Water Monitoring                                     -                -            112                 -            -              -                17           130 317 Ground Water Monitoring Subtotal                                           $              - $              - $          431 $                - $          - $            - $              66 $        497 318 (17) 319 LT-U-1 20                     Information Technology                                 2,524             1,547         5,684             5,993             -          1,680               995       18,424 (17) 320 SNF-U-2 20                     Information Technology                                     -              960         3,496               374             -              -              738         5,568 (17) 321 SR-U-3 15                     Information Technology                                     -            1,605         2,574               624             -              -              730         5,533 (18) 322 LT-U-1 21                     Telecommunications                                     1,275               35           137                 88           -            815                 -        2,350 (18) 323 LT-U-1 22                     Personal Computers                                         -                9             9                 -            -              -                -            18 (18) 324 SNF-U-2 22                     Personal Computers                                         -                7             -                  -            -              -                -            7 325 Information Technology Subtotal                                           $          3,799 $          4,163 $      11,900 $          7,080 $          - $        2,496 $          2,463 $      31,900 326 7 Of 9
334 3,317 26 79 3,758 311 SNF-U-2 27 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 633 333 147 1,114 312 SR-U-3 23 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 181 1,403 238 1,822 313 Environmental Permits and Fees Subtotal 2
                                                                                      %
1,149 5,053 26 465 6,695 314 315 SNF-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 319 49 368 316 SR-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 112 17 130 317 Ground Water Monitoring Subtotal 431 66 497 318 319 LT-U-1 20 Information Technology (17) 2,524 1,547 5,684 5,993 1,680 995 18,424 320 SNF-U-2 20 Information Technology (17) 960 3,496 374 738 5,568 321 SR-U-3 15 Information Technology (17) 1,605 2,574 624 730 5,533 322 LT-U-1 21 Telecommunications (18) 1,275 35 137 88 815 2,350 323 LT-U-1 22 Personal Computers (18) 9 9
18 324 SNF-U-2 22 Personal Computers (18) 7 7
325 Information Technology Subtotal 3,799 4,163 11,900 7,080 2,496 2,463 31,900 326 7 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.                Description                                           Labor           Material       Contract         Other           Disposal     Overheads       Contingency     Total 327 LT-U-1 05                         Insurance                                                       1                 -              -            18,675             -              -            1,048       19,723 (19) 328 LT-U-1 14                         Workers Compensation Insurance                                   -                -              -              381             -              -                -          381 329 SNF-U-2 06                       Insurance                                                       -                -              -            33,712             -              -            4,835       38,547 330 SR-U-3 04                         Insurance                                                       -                -              -            4,358             -              -              654         5,011 331 Insurance Subtotal                                                                 $              1 $              - $            - $          57,126 $          - $            - $          6,536 $      63,663 332 (2) 333 LT-U-Legal                       Third-Party Legal                                               -                -          8,460             (122)           -              16             1,006         9,359 (2) 334 SNF-U-Legal                       Third-Party Legal                                               -                -          9,013                 15           -              19             1,076       10,123 (2) 335 SR-U-Legal                       Third-Party Legal                                             (802)               -          5,013                 7           -            (389)             486         4,315 336 Third-Party Legal Subtotal                                                         $            (802) $              - $      22,486 $            (100) $          - $          (353) $          2,568 $      23,799 337 338 LT-U-1 07                         NRC Fees                                                         -                -              4           10,480             -              42               927       11,452 339 SNF-U-2 08                       NRC Fees                                                         -                -            28           17,229             -              3             2,474       19,735 340 NRC Fees Subtotal                                                                 $              - $              - $          32 $          27,709 $          - $            45 $          3,401 $      31,187 341 (2) 342 LT-U-Office                       Office Space                                                     -                19           937                 -            -              -              147         1,104 (2) 343 SNF-U-Office                     Office Space                                                     -              343             3                 -            -              -                52           397 (2) 344 SR-U-Office                       Office Space                                                     -              100             35                 -            -              -                20           154 345 Office Space Lease Subtotal                                                       $              - $            461 $          975 $                - $          - $            - $            219 $      1,655 346 347 LT-U-1 04                         Security Related Expenses                                       -              160           205               245             -              2               54           667 348 SNF-U-2 05                       Security Related Expenses                                       1             1,847         6,180             1,261             -              10             1,259       10,559 349 SR-U-3 03                         Security Related Expenses                                       2               121           309               114             -              4               16           566 350 Security Related Expenses Subtotal                                                 $              4 $          2,129 $        6,694 $          1,620 $          - $            16 $          1,329 $      11,792 351 352 SR-U-3 11                         Severance                                                 102,979                 -          1,796             4,018             -          8,329             3,925     121,047 353 Severance Subtotal                                                                 $        102,979 $              - $        1,796 $          4,018 $          - $        8,329 $          3,925 $    121,047 354 355 LT-U-1 06                         Site Lease and Easement Expenses                                 1                 -            68             3,996             -              -              336         4,401 356 SNF-U-2 07                       Site Lease and Easement Expenses                                 -                -              -            39,974             -              -            5,996       45,970 357 SR-U-3 05                         Site Lease and Easement Expenses                                 2                 -            218           41,749             -              -            5,141       47,110 358 Site Lease and Easement Expenses Subtotal                                         $              3 $              - $          286 $          85,719 $          - $            - $          11,473 $      97,481 359 (2) 360 SNF-U-SFL                         Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE                           -                -        26,543                 -            -              -            4,083       30,626 361 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE Subtotal                                   $              - $              - $      26,543 $                - $          - $            - $          4,083 $      30,626 362 363 LT-U-1 19                         Tools and Equipment                                             -                -            14                 34           -              -                -            49 364 Tools and Equipment Subtotal                                                       $              - $              - $          14 $              34 $          - $            - $              - $          49 365 (20) 366 LT-U-1 18                         Water                                                           -                -              -            3,773             -              9               419         4,201 (20) 367 SNF-U-2 18                       Water                                                           -                -              -            7,975             -              6             1,076         9,056 (20) 368 SR-U-3 13                         Water                                                           -                -              -            2,850             -              -              426         3,276 369 Water Subtotal                                                                     $              - $              - $            - $          14,598 $          - $            15 $          1,921 $      16,534 370 371 LT-U-1 02                         Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies                           -              113           970                 28           -              8               20         1,139 372 SNF-U-2 02                       Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies                           -              150         2,192                 47           -              12               122         2,524 373 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Subtotal                                     $              - $            263 $        3,162 $              75 $          - $            20 $            142 $      3,663 374 375 Non-Labor Subtotal                                                                 $        107,408 $        29,374 $      260,155 $        362,842 $          - $        11,283 $        77,722 $    848,786 8 Of 9
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 327 LT-U-1 05 Insurance 1
                                                                                              %
18,675 1,048 19,723 328 LT-U-1 14 Workers Compensation Insurance (19) 381 381 329 SNF-U-2 06 Insurance 33,712 4,835 38,547 330 SR-U-3 04 Insurance 4,358 654 5,011 331 Insurance Subtotal 1
57,126 6,536 63,663 332 333 LT-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 8,460 (122) 16 1,006 9,359 334 SNF-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 9,013 15 19 1,076 10,123 335 SR-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal (802) 5,013 7
(389) 486 4,315 336 Third-Party Legal Subtotal (802) 22,486 (100)
(353) 2,568 23,799 337 338 LT-U-1 07 NRC Fees 4
10,480 42 927 11,452 339 SNF-U-2 08 NRC Fees 28 17,229 3
2,474 19,735 340 NRC Fees Subtotal 32 27,709 45 3,401 31,187 341 342 LT-U-Office (2) Office Space 19 937 147 1,104 343 SNF-U-Office (2) Office Space 343 3
52 397 344 SR-U-Office (2) Office Space 100 35 20 154 345 Office Space Lease Subtotal 461 975 219 1,655 346 347 LT-U-1 04 Security Related Expenses 160 205 245 2
54 667 348 SNF-U-2 05 Security Related Expenses 1
1,847 6,180 1,261 10 1,259 10,559 349 SR-U-3 03 Security Related Expenses 2
121 309 114 4
16 566 350 Security Related Expenses Subtotal 4
2,129 6,694 1,620 16 1,329 11,792 351 352 SR-U-3 11 Severance 102,979 1,796 4,018 8,329 3,925 121,047 353 Severance Subtotal 102,979 1,796 4,018 8,329 3,925 121,047 354 355 LT-U-1 06 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 1
68 3,996 336 4,401 356 SNF-U-2 07 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 39,974 5,996 45,970 357 SR-U-3 05 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 2
218 41,749 5,141 47,110 358 Site Lease and Easement Expenses Subtotal 3
286 85,719 11,473 97,481 359 360 SNF-U-SFL (2) Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 26,543 4,083 30,626 361 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE Subtotal 26,543 4,083 30,626 362 363 LT-U-1 19 Tools and Equipment 14 34 49 364 Tools and Equipment Subtotal 14 34 49 365 366 LT-U-1 18 Water (20) 3,773 9
419 4,201 367 SNF-U-2 18 Water (20) 7,975 6
1,076 9,056 368 SR-U-3 13 Water (20) 2,850 426 3,276 369 Water Subtotal 14,598 15 1,921 16,534 370 371 LT-U-1 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 113 970 28 8
20 1,139 372 SNF-U-2 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 150 2,192 47 12 122 2,524 373 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Subtotal 263 3,162 75 20 142 3,663 374 375 Non-Labor Subtotal 107,408 29,374 260,155 362,842 11,283 77,722 848,786 8 Of 9
%


Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)
Total (2014$)
Total (2014$)
(1)
DCE No.(1)
DCE No.              Description                             Labor           Material       Contract         Other         Disposal     Overheads       Contingency     Total 376 377 Service Level Agreements (2) 378 LT-U-SLA                       Service Level Agreements                     30,319               (9)         2,204           28,976           -          8,542           6,034       76,066 (2) 379 SNF-U-SLA                     Service Level Agreements                       7,435               (8)         1,993             8,847           -          24,284           3,385       45,935 (2) 380 SR-U-SLA                       Service Level Agreements                       9,171                 -            127             7,936           -          24,745           4,232       46,211 381 Service Level Agreements Subtotal                                 $          46,925 $            (17) $        4,324 $          45,759 $          - $        57,571 $        13,651 $    168,212 382 383 DGC Staffing 384                                                                                   -                -                                -            -              -
Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 376 377 Service Level Agreements 378 LT-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 30,319 (9) 2,204 28,976 8,542 6,034 76,066 379 SNF-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 7,435 (8) 1,993 8,847 24,284 3,385 45,935 380 SR-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 9,171 127 7,936 24,745 4,232 46,211 381 Service Level Agreements Subtotal 46,925 (17) 4,324 45,759 57,571 13,651 168,212 382 383 DGC Staffing 384 385 386 Subtotal DGC Staffing 387 388 Undistributed Subtotal 389 390 Total 9 Of 9
385                                                                                   -                -                                -            -              -
%
386 Subtotal DGC Staffing                                             $              - $              - $              $              - $          - $            - $                $
387 388 Undistributed Subtotal                                           $                $                  $              $                $          - $              $                $
389 390 Total                                                             $                $                  $              $                $            $              $                $
9 Of 9
                                                                              %


Notes To Appendix C Notes:
Notes To Appendix C Notes:
(1) The DCE line numbers align to the line numbers in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE. The DCE line numbers indicate the corresponding 2014 DCE (1) NRC cost account, (2) 2014 DCE period, (3) cost type (i.e., distributed or undistributed), and (4) line number. For example, LT-2-D-2.17 in Appendix C of this DCE corresponds to License Termination Period 2 distributed cost line number 2.17 in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.
(2) These line items were not included in the 2014 DCE, and therefore a new DCE No. has been created.
(2) These line items were not included in the 2014 DCE, and therefore a new DCE No. has been created.
(3) The description for DCE line number SNF-1-D-7.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Design and Fabricate Spent Fuel Canisters" has been updated to "Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure" to better reflect the associated costs.
(15) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.05 in the 2014 DCE of "Clean Demolition of ISFSI Support Structures" has been updated to "Demolish ISFSI Security Building" to better reflect the associated costs.
(4) The description for DCE line number SNF-2-D-8.08 in the 2014 DCE of "Design ISFSI Expansion" has been updated to "Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight" to better reflect the associated costs.
(5) The description for DCE line numbers SNF-2-D-8.10 and SNF-2-D-8.11 in the 2014 DCE of "Purchase and Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters and AHSMs" for Units 2 & 3, respectively, have been updated to "Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters" to better reflect the associated costs.
(6) The description for DCE line numbers SNF-2-D-8.12 and SNF-2-D-8.13 in the 2014 DCE of "Deliver and Load Spent Fuel Canisters and Transfer to ISFSI" for Units 2 & 3, respectively, have been updated to "Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations" to better reflect the associated costs.
(7) In Advice Letter 3589-E, Aging Management recorded costs were included in DCE No. SNF-2-D-AM. In the 2017 DCE, Areva and Holtec Aging Management costs are estimated separately, and therefore the Areva and Holtec recorded costs are also shown separately and are included in DCE Nos. SNF-2-D-AM Areva and SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1.
(8) The description for DCE line number SR-1-D-14.01 in the 2014 DCE of "Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment" has been updated to "Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender" to better reflect the associated costs.
(9) The description for DCE line number SR-2-D-15.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Obtain Required Permits For Mesa, South Access and South Yard" has been updated to "Obtain Required Permits - Mesa" to better reflect the associated costs.
(10) The description for DCE line number SR-2-D-15.09 in the 2014 DCE of "Demolish Mesa Buildings" has been updated to "Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance" to better reflect the associated costs.
(11) The description for DCE line number SR-3-D-16.05 in the 2014 DCE of "Obtain Required Permits and Approvals" has been updated to "Obtain CEQA Permit &
(11) The description for DCE line number SR-3-D-16.05 in the 2014 DCE of "Obtain Required Permits and Approvals" has been updated to "Obtain CEQA Permit &
Approvals" to better reflect the associated costs.
Approvals" to better reflect the associated costs.
Line 1,476: Line 2,153:
(13) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Decon AHSMs" has been updated to "Decon Areva Modules" to better reflect the associated costs.
(13) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Decon AHSMs" has been updated to "Decon Areva Modules" to better reflect the associated costs.
(14) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.04 in the 2014 DCE of "Clean Demolition of ISFSI AHSMs and Pad" has been updated to "Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules" to better reflect the associated costs.
(14) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.04 in the 2014 DCE of "Clean Demolition of ISFSI AHSMs and Pad" has been updated to "Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules" to better reflect the associated costs.
(15) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.05 in the 2014 DCE of "Clean Demolition of ISFSI Support Structures" has been updated to "Demolish ISFSI Security Building" to better reflect the associated costs.
(1) The DCE line numbers align to the line numbers in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE. The DCE line numbers indicate the corresponding 2014 DCE (1) NRC cost account, (2) 2014 DCE period, (3) cost type (i.e., distributed or undistributed), and (4) line number. For example, LT-2-D-2.17 in Appendix C of this DCE corresponds to License Termination Period 2 distributed cost line number 2.17 in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.
(7) In Advice Letter 3589-E, Aging Management recorded costs were included in DCE No. SNF-2-D-AM. In the 2017 DCE, Areva and Holtec Aging Management costs are estimated separately, and therefore the Areva and Holtec recorded costs are also shown separately and are included in DCE Nos. SNF-2-D-AM Areva and SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1.
(8) The description for DCE line number SR-1-D-14.01 in the 2014 DCE of "Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment" has been updated to "Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender" to better reflect the associated costs.
(9) The description for DCE line number SR-2-D-15.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Obtain Required Permits For Mesa, South Access and South Yard" has been updated to "Obtain Required Permits - Mesa" to better reflect the associated costs.
(10) The description for DCE line number SR-2-D-15.09 in the 2014 DCE of "Demolish Mesa Buildings" has been updated to "Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance" to better reflect the associated costs.
(3) The description for DCE line number SNF-1-D-7.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Design and Fabricate Spent Fuel Canisters" has been updated to "Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure" to better reflect the associated costs.
(4) The description for DCE line number SNF-2-D-8.08 in the 2014 DCE of "Design ISFSI Expansion" has been updated to "Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight" to better reflect the associated costs.
(5) The description for DCE line numbers SNF-2-D-8.10 and SNF-2-D-8.11 in the 2014 DCE of "Purchase and Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters and AHSMs" for Units 2 & 3, respectively, have been updated to "Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters" to better reflect the associated costs.
(6) The description for DCE line numbers SNF-2-D-8.12 and SNF-2-D-8.13 in the 2014 DCE of "Deliver and Load Spent Fuel Canisters and Transfer to ISFSI" for Units 2 & 3, respectively, have been updated to "Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations" to better reflect the associated costs.
1 Of 2
1 Of 2
                                                                                    %
%


Notes To Appendix C (16) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.08, SNF-U-2.11, and SR-U-3.06 in the 2014 DCE of "Materials and Services" has been updated to "Contracted Services" to better reflect the associated costs.
Notes To Appendix C (19) Estimated costs (i.e., 2017-2051) for workers compensation insurance are included in DCE line items LT-U-1.05, SNF-U-2.06, and SR-U-3.04, "Insurance."
(21) The undistributed DGC staffing costs associated with the fixed price contract are included in the distributed project for Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal.
(20) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.18, SNF-U-2.18, and SR-U-3.13 in the 2014 DCE of "Utilities (Water, Gas, Phone)" has been updated to "Water" to better reflect the associated costs.
(16) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.08, SNF-U-2.11, and SR-U-3.06 in the 2014 DCE of "Materials and Services" has been updated to "Contracted Services" to better reflect the associated costs.
(17) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.20, SNF-U-2.20, and SR-U-3.15 in the 2014 DCE of "Non-Process Computers" has been updated to "Information Technology" to better reflect the associated costs.
(17) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.20, SNF-U-2.20, and SR-U-3.15 in the 2014 DCE of "Non-Process Computers" has been updated to "Information Technology" to better reflect the associated costs.
(18) All estimated (i.e., 2017-2051) undistributed Information Technology costs that are not covered by the IT Service Level Agreement are captured in DCE line items LT-U-1.20, SNF-U-2.20, and SR-U-3.15, "Information Technology," and therefore DCE line items LT-U-1.21, LT-U-1.22, and SNF-U-2.22 for Telecommunications and Personal Computers do not include any estimated costs.
(18) All estimated (i.e., 2017-2051) undistributed Information Technology costs that are not covered by the IT Service Level Agreement are captured in DCE line items LT-U-1.20, SNF-U-2.20, and SR-U-3.15, "Information Technology," and therefore DCE line items LT-U-1.21, LT-U-1.22, and SNF-U-2.22 for Telecommunications and Personal Computers do not include any estimated costs.
(19) Estimated costs (i.e., 2017-2051) for workers compensation insurance are included in DCE line items LT-U-1.05, SNF-U-2.06, and SR-U-3.04, "Insurance."
(20) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.18, SNF-U-2.18, and SR-U-3.13 in the 2014 DCE of "Utilities (Water, Gas, Phone)" has been updated to "Water" to better reflect the associated costs.
(21) The undistributed DGC staffing costs associated with the fixed price contract are included in the distributed project for Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal.
2 Of 2
2 Of 2
                                                                                  %
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix '
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix '
Annual Cash Flow Tables By NRC Cost &DWHJRU\
Annual Cash Flow Tables By NRC Cost &DWHJRU\\
                                            %
%


Appendix D Table 1-A Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC&RVW &DWHJRU\ - Unit 2 Nominal / 2017 Dollars in Thousands License             Spent Fuel Period          Year          Termination          Management         Site Restoration   Total Pd 1 - Initial Activities 2013       $          40,388   $          40,591     $          40,988 $    121,967 2014                   56,443               39,579                 12,731       108,753 2015                   63,557               55,132                 25,520       144,209 2016                   43,464               62,700                 1,044       107,208 Pd 2 -Transition & Pool  2017                 104,155               67,490                 4,667       176,313 Storage 2018                   61,943               68,965                 3,710       134,618 Pd 3 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry      2019                  49,280              27,254                  9,911        86,445 Storage          2020                   58,306               15,799                 1,847       75,951 2021                 141,012               8,718                 2,240       151,971 2022                 153,239               8,077                 22,202       183,517 2023                   65,533               5,536                 52,406       123,475 2024                   40,938               5,423                 32,450       78,811 2025                   31,276               5,344                 24,942       61,562 2026                   60,901               5,747                 15,901       82,548 2027                   17,045               5,536                 41,145       63,726 2028                   19,853               5,678                 1,871       27,402 Pd 5 - Dry Storage 2029                       -                9,883                 1,241       11,124 2030                       -                9,842                     -        9,842 2031                       -              10,224                     20       10,244 2032                       -              10,528                     24       10,552 2033                       -              12,192                     18       12,209 2034                       -              12,170                     18       12,187 2035                       -              13,401                     20       13,422 2036                       -              12,628                     -        12,628 2037                       -              11,127                     -        11,127 2038                       -              10,971                     -        10,971 2039                       -              11,445                     -        11,445 2040                       -              11,363                     68       11,431 2041                       -              10,905                     45       10,950 2042                       -              11,626                     43       11,669 2043                       -              11,629                     27       11,656 2044                       -              11,041                 4,317       15,359 2045                       -              10,440                 4,308       14,748 Pd 6 - Civil Works 2046                       -                8,600                 29,378       37,977 Project 2047                       -                7,150                 76,564       83,714 2048                       -                8,454                 62,150       70,604 2049                       -              35,143                 14,931       50,074 Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition 2050                       -              12,763                 12,744       25,507
Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,591 40,988 121,967 2014 56,443 39,579 12,731 108,753 2015 63,557 55,132 25,520 144,209 2016 43,464 62,700 1,044 107,208 2017 104,155 67,490 4,667 176,313 2018 61,943 68,965 3,710 134,618 Pd 3 2020 58,306 15,799 1,847 75,951 2021 141,012 8,718 2,240 151,971 2022 153,239 8,077 22,202 183,517 2023 65,533 5,536 52,406 123,475 2024 40,938 5,423 32,450 78,811 2025 31,276 5,344 24,942 61,562 2026 60,901 5,747 15,901 82,548 2027 17,045 5,536 41,145 63,726 2028 19,853 5,678 1,871 27,402 2029 9,883 1,241 11,124 2030 9,842 9,842 2031 10,224 20 10,244 2032 10,528 24 10,552 2033 12,192 18 12,209 2034 12,170 18 12,187 2035 13,401 20 13,422 2036 12,628 12,628 2037 11,127 11,127 2038 10,971 10,971 2039 11,445 11,445 2040 11,363 68 11,431 2041 10,905 45 10,950 2042 11,626 43 11,669 2043 11,629 27 11,656 2044 11,041 4,317 15,359 2045 10,440 4,308 14,748 2046 8,600 29,378 37,977 2047 7,150 76,564 83,714 2048 8,454 62,150 70,604 2049 35,143 14,931 50,074 2050 12,763 12,744 25,507 2051 6,125 23,682 29,807 Total
& Final Site Restoration 2051                       -                6,125                 23,682       29,807 Total     $       1,007,333   $        697,217     $          523,173 $   2,227,722
$ 1,007,333 697,217 523,173  
                                                        %
$ 2,227,722 Appendix D Table 1-A Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC&RVW &DWHJRU\\ - Unit 2 Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition
& Final Site Restoration Nominal / 2017 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 49,280 27,254 9,911 86,445 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage
%


Appendix D Table 1-B Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC &RVW&DWHJRU\ - Unit 3 Nominal / 2017 Dollars in Thousands License             Spent Fuel Period          Year        Termination          Management         Site Restoration   Total Pd 1 - Initial Activities 2013       $          40,388   $          40,161     $          40,988 $    121,538 2014                 56,270               39,421                 12,731       108,422 2015                 63,601               47,813                 27,164       138,577 2016                 43,688               65,477                 5,157       114,322 Pd 2 -Transition & Pool  2017                 99,851               69,885                 15,574       185,310 Storage 2018                 62,289               70,530                 11,543       144,362 Pd 3 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry      2019                  52,448              28,927                16,145        97,520 Storage          2020                 76,967               17,443                 5,994       100,404 2021                 122,673               10,562                 8,131       141,366 2022                 118,848               9,931                 27,672       156,451 2023                 65,340               7,406                 55,726       128,472 2024                 46,564               7,293                 39,281       93,137 2025                 53,899               7,214                 37,747       98,860 2026                 51,797               6,684                 23,721       82,202 2027                 23,351               6,473                 40,386       70,210 2028                 19,859               6,615                 1,895       28,369 Pd 5 - Dry Storage 2029                       -              10,908                 1,241       12,150 2030                       -              10,811                     -        10,811 2031                       -              11,192                   834       12,027 2032                       -              11,568                 1,011       12,579 2033                       -              13,203                   749       13,952 2034                       -              13,174                   757       13,930 2035                       -              14,552                   867       15,420 2036                       -              13,700                     -        13,700 2037                       -              12,199                     -        12,199 2038                       -              12,100                     -        12,100 2039                       -              12,517                     -        12,517 2040                       -              12,435                 2,879       15,314 2041                       -              12,034                 1,916       13,950 2042                       -              12,698                 1,804       14,502 2043                       -              12,701                 1,123       13,824 2044                       -              12,688                 9,105       21,794 2045                       -              11,972                 8,718       20,690 Pd 6 - Civil Works 2046                       -                9,654                 29,648       39,302 Project 2047                       -                8,492                 76,834       85,326 2048                       -                9,508                 61,774       71,282 2049                       -              36,198                 34,134       70,331 Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition 2050                       -              12,763                 66,431       79,194
Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,161 40,988 121,538 2014 56,270 39,421 12,731 108,422 2015 63,601 47,813 27,164 138,577 2016 43,688 65,477 5,157 114,322 2017 99,851 69,885 15,574 185,310 2018 62,289 70,530 11,543 144,362 Pd 3 2020 76,967 17,443 5,994 100,404 2021 122,673 10,562 8,131 141,366 2022 118,848 9,931 27,672 156,451 2023 65,340 7,406 55,726 128,472 2024 46,564 7,293 39,281 93,137 2025 53,899 7,214 37,747 98,860 2026 51,797 6,684 23,721 82,202 2027 23,351 6,473 40,386 70,210 2028 19,859 6,615 1,895 28,369 2029 10,908 1,241 12,150 2030 10,811 10,811 2031 11,192 834 12,027 2032 11,568 1,011 12,579 2033 13,203 749 13,952 2034 13,174 757 13,930 2035 14,552 867 15,420 2036 13,700 13,700 2037 12,199 12,199 2038 12,100 12,100 2039 12,517 12,517 2040 12,435 2,879 15,314 2041 12,034 1,916 13,950 2042 12,698 1,804 14,502 2043 12,701 1,123 13,824 2044 12,688 9,105 21,794 2045 11,972 8,718 20,690 2046 9,654 29,648 39,302 2047 8,492 76,834 85,326 2048 9,508 61,774 71,282 2049 36,198 34,134 70,331 2050 12,763 66,431 79,194 2051 6,125 72,005 78,130 Total 997,833 735,025 741,683  
& Final Site Restoration 2051                       -                6,125                 72,005       78,130 Total     $        997,833   $        735,025     $          741,683 $   2,474,542
$ 2,474,542 Appendix D Table 1-B Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC &RVW&DWHJRU\\ - Unit 3 Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition
                                                      %
& Final Site Restoration Nominal / 2017 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 52,448 28,927 16,145 97,520 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage
%


Appendix D Table 2-A Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC &RVW&DtHJRU\ - Unit 2 2014 Dollars in Thousands License           Spent Fuel Period          Year          Termination        Management           Site Restoration   Total Pd 1 - Initial Activities 2013       $          40,388   $        40,591     $            40,988 $    121,967 2014                 56,443             39,579                 12,731       108,753 2015                 62,388             54,147                 25,017       141,552 2016                 41,851             60,067                   1,026       102,945 Pd 2 -Transition & Pool  2017                 97,798             63,427                   4,397       165,622 Storage 2018                 58,415             64,919                   3,512       126,845 Pd 3 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry      2019                  46,449              25,691                  9,376        81,515 Storage          2020                 54,947             14,904                   1,767       71,617 2021                 132,808               8,224                   2,138       143,170 2022                 144,304               7,618                 20,915       172,837 2023                 61,728               5,225                 49,370       116,323 2024                 38,580               5,120                 30,609       74,309 2025                 29,487               5,044                 23,539       58,070 2026                 57,385               5,423                 15,014       77,822 2027                 16,089               5,226                 38,808       60,123 2028                 18,764               5,358                   1,787       25,909 Pd 5 - Dry Storage 2029                       -              9,361                   1,170       10,531 2030                       -              9,325                       -        9,325 2031                       -              9,680                     19         9,698 2032                       -              9,965                     22         9,988 2033                       -              11,534                     17       11,550 2034                       -              11,513                     17       11,529 2035                       -              12,671                     19       12,691 2036                       -              11,946                       -        11,946 2037                       -              10,530                       -        10,530 2038                       -              10,383                       -        10,383 2039                       -              10,835                       -        10,835 2040                       -              10,754                     64       10,818 2041                       -              10,323                     43       10,365 2042                       -              11,004                     40       11,044 2043                       -              11,003                     25       11,028 2044                       -              10,452                   4,057       14,510 2045                       -              9,889                   4,049       13,938 Pd 6 - Civil Works 2046                       -              8,106                 27,855       35,962 Project 2047                       -              6,743                 72,797       79,540 2048                       -              7,972                 58,788       66,760 2049                       -              33,100                 14,123       47,223 Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition 2050                       -              12,071                 12,050       24,121
Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,591 40,988 121,967 2014 56,443 39,579 12,731 108,753 2015 62,388 54,147 25,017 141,552 2016 41,851 60,067 1,026 102,945 2017 97,798 63,427 4,397 165,622 2018 58,415 64,919 3,512 126,845 Pd 3 2020 54,947 14,904 1,767 71,617 2021 132,808 8,224 2,138 143,170 2022 144,304 7,618 20,915 172,837 2023 61,728 5,225 49,370 116,323 2024 38,580 5,120 30,609 74,309 2025 29,487 5,044 23,539 58,070 2026 57,385 5,423 15,014 77,822 2027 16,089 5,226 38,808 60,123 2028 18,764 5,358 1,787 25,909 2029 9,361 1,170 10,531 2030 9,325 9,325 2031 9,680 19 9,698 2032 9,965 22 9,988 2033 11,534 17 11,550 2034 11,513 17 11,529 2035 12,671 19 12,691 2036 11,946 11,946 2037 10,530 10,530 2038 10,383 10,383 2039 10,835 10,835 2040 10,754 64 10,818 2041 10,323 43 10,365 2042 11,004 40 11,044 2043 11,003 25 11,028 2044 10,452 4,057 14,510 2045 9,889 4,049 13,938 2046 8,106 27,855 35,962 2047 6,743 72,797 79,540 2048 7,972 58,788 66,760 2049 33,100 14,123 47,223 2050 12,071 12,050 24,121 2051 5,804 22,433 28,238 Total 957,823 665,525 498,584  
& Final Site Restoration 2051                       -              5,804                 22,433       28,238 Total     $        957,823   $        665,525     $          498,584 $   2,121,932
$ 2,121,932 Appendix D Table 2-A Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC &RVW&DtHJRU\\ - Unit 2 2014 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 46,449 25,691 9,376 81,515 Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition
                                                      %
& Final Site Restoration Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project
%


Appendix D Table 2-B Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC&RVW&DWHJRU\ - Unit 3 2014 Dollars in Thousands License             Spent Fuel Period          Year          Termination          Management           Site Restoration   Total Pd 1 - Initial Activities 2013     $          40,388   $          40,161     $            40,988 $    121,538 2014                 56,270               39,421                 12,731       108,422 2015                 62,436               46,872                 26,631       135,939 2016                 42,075               63,001                   4,981       110,057 Pd 2 -Transition & Pool  2017                 93,754               65,719                 14,650       174,122 Storage 2018                 58,747               66,431                 10,886       136,065 Pd 3 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry      2019                  49,431              27,304                  15,243        91,978 Storage          2020                 72,511               16,489                   5,671       94,671 2021                 115,546               9,997                   7,703       133,246 2022                 111,934               9,400                 26,065       147,399 2023                 61,546               7,022                 52,495       121,063 2024                 43,875               6,917                 37,039       87,831 2025                 50,781               6,841                 35,592       93,213 2026                 48,817               6,323                 22,375       77,514 2027                 22,025               6,126                 38,094       66,245 2028                 18,770               6,258                   1,810       26,839 Pd 5 - Dry Storage 2029                       -              10,345                   1,170       11,515 2030                       -              10,255                       -        10,255 2031                       -              10,610                     786       11,396 2032                       -              10,963                     952       11,916 2033                       -              12,505                     705       13,210 2034                       -              12,477                     712       13,189 2035                       -              13,776                     816       14,592 2036                       -              12,976                       -        12,976 2037                       -              11,560                       -        11,560 2038                       -              11,467                       -        11,467 2039                       -              11,865                       -        11,865 2040                       -              11,784                   2,710       14,494 2041                       -              11,407                   1,803       13,210 2042                       -              12,034                   1,698       13,732 2043                       -              12,033                   1,057       13,090 2044                       -              12,023                   8,565       20,588 2045                       -              11,351                   8,201       19,552 Pd 6 - Civil Works 2046                       -                9,120                 28,115       37,235 Project 2047                       -                8,027                 73,056       81,083 2048                       -                8,986                 58,430       67,416 2049                       -              34,114                 32,373       66,487 Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition 2050                       -              12,071                 63,258       75,328
Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,161 40,988 121,538 2014 56,270 39,421 12,731 108,422 2015 62,436 46,872 26,631 135,939 2016 42,075 63,001 4,981 110,057 2017 93,754 65,719 14,650 174,122 2018 58,747 66,431 10,886 136,065 Pd 3 2020 72,511 16,489 5,671 94,671 2021 115,546 9,997 7,703 133,246 2022 111,934 9,400 26,065 147,399 2023 61,546 7,022 52,495 121,063 2024 43,875 6,917 37,039 87,831 2025 50,781 6,841 35,592 93,213 2026 48,817 6,323 22,375 77,514 2027 22,025 6,126 38,094 66,245 2028 18,770 6,258 1,810 26,839 2029 10,345 1,170 11,515 2030 10,255 10,255 2031 10,610 786 11,396 2032 10,963 952 11,916 2033 12,505 705 13,210 2034 12,477 712 13,189 2035 13,776 816 14,592 2036 12,976 12,976 2037 11,560 11,560 2038 11,467 11,467 2039 11,865 11,865 2040 11,784 2,710 14,494 2041 11,407 1,803 13,210 2042 12,034 1,698 13,732 2043 12,033 1,057 13,090 2044 12,023 8,565 20,588 2045 11,351 8,201 19,552 2046 9,120 28,115 37,235 2047 8,027 73,056 81,083 2048 8,986 58,430 67,416 2049 34,114 32,373 66,487 2050 12,071 63,258 75,328 2051 5,804 68,532 74,336 Total 948,906 701,836 705,892  
& Final Site Restoration 2051                       -                5,804                 68,532       74,336 Total     $          948,906   $        701,836     $          705,892 $   2,356,634
$ 2,356,634 Appendix D Table 2-B Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC&RVW&DWHJRU\\ - Unit 3 Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition
                                                      %
& Final Site Restoration 2014 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 49,431 27,304 15,243 91,978 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage
%


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix (
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix (
6KDUH2I/LDELOLW\)RU621*63DUWLFLSDQWV
6KDUH2I/LDELOLW\\)RU621*63DUWLFLSDQWV
                                            %
%


Appendix E Share Of Liability For SONGS ParticipanWV Cost Categories                SDG&E      Riverside    Anaheim          SCE SONGS 1                                        20%        0%          0%            80%
Appendix E Share Of Liability For SONGS ParticipanWV Note:
SONGS 2                                        20%      1.79%      2.4737%        75.7363%
SONGS 3                                        20%      1.79%      2.4625%        75.4775%
Common Facilities (Units 2 & 3)                20%      1.79%      2.4681%        75.7419%
SONGS 1 Fuel                                    20%        0%          0%            80%
SONGS 2/3 Fuel                                  20%      1.79%      2.3398%        75.8702%
ISFSI Maintenance and D&D                      20%      1.6066%      2.2686%        76.1248%
San Diego Switchyard                          100%        0%          0%              0%
Edison Switchyard                                0%        0%          0%            100%
Interconnection Facilities                      50%        0%            0%            50%
Nuclear Fuel Cancellation Charges              20%      1.79%          0%          78.21%
Note:
SDG&E, Riverside, and Anaheim incur additional costs related to oversight activities that are not included in the 2017 DCE.
SDG&E, Riverside, and Anaheim incur additional costs related to oversight activities that are not included in the 2017 DCE.
                                              %
Cost Categories SDG&E Riverside Anaheim SCE SONGS 1 20%
0%
0%
80%
SONGS 2 20%
1.79%
2.4737%
75.7363%
SONGS 3 20%
1.79%
2.4625%
75.4775%
Common Facilities (Units 2 & 3) 20%
1.79%
2.4681%
75.7419%
SONGS 1 Fuel 20%
0%
0%
80%
SONGS 2/3 Fuel 20%
1.79%
2.3398%
75.8702%
ISFSI Maintenance and D&D 20%
1.6066%
2.2686%
76.1248%
San Diego Switchyard 100%
0%
0%
0%
Edison Switchyard 0%
0%
0%
100%
Interconnection Facilities 50%
0%
0%
50%
Nuclear Fuel Cancellation Charges 20%
1.79%
0%
78.21%
%


Appendix C Reconciliation - Confidential
Appendix C Reconciliation - Confidential  


Appendix D Declaration of Todd R. Adler Regarding the Confidentiality of Certain Data
Appendix D Declaration of Todd R. Adler Regarding the Confidentiality of Certain Data  


1       SCEs 2018 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING COST TRIENNIAL PROCEEDING 2                              DECLARATION OF TODD R. ADLER 3                  REGARDING THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF CERTAIN DATA 4
D-1 SCEs 2018 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING COST TRIENNIAL PROCEEDING 1
5 I, Todd R. Adler, declare and state:
DECLARATION OF TODD R. ADLER 2
6          1. I am employed by Southern California Edison (SCE) as a Principal Manager for Nuclear 7 Projects Management, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). In my position as Principal 8 Manager, I have responsibility regarding the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) 9 Agreement between SCE, EnergySolutions Services, Inc. (EnergySolutions), and AECOM Energy &
REGARDING THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF CERTAIN DATA 3
10 Construction, Inc. (AECOM), dated December 20, 2016 (DGC Agreement). EnergySolutions and 11 AECOM formed a joint venture known as SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS). I also am 12 familiar with the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Agreement between SCE and 13 Holtec International (ISFSI Agreement), dated December 5, 2015. I had responsibility for overseeing 14 and reviewing Exhibits SCE-03 and SCE-05, which contain certain confidential information 15 pertaining to the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement. Thomas J. Palmisano, Vice President of 16 SONGS Decommissioning and Chief Nuclear Officer, delegated authority to me to sign this 17 declaration regarding the confidentiality of this information, as described below.
4 I, Todd R. Adler, declare and state:
18          2. I am making this declaration in accordance with the instructions set forth in Decision 16-19 08-024 and Decision 17-09-023 of R. 14-11-001, which were issued August 25, 2016, and September 20 28, 2017, respectively, and govern the submission of confidential documents to the Commission.
5
21          3. I have personal knowledge of the facts and representations herein and, if called upon to 22 testify, could and would do so, except for those facts expressly stated to be based upon information 23 and belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true.
: 1. I am employed by Southern California Edison (SCE) as a Principal Manager for Nuclear 6
24          4. Listed below are the data for which SCE is seeking confidential protection and the basis 25 for SCEs confidentiality request. Paragraphs 5-10 also provide additional reasons supporting SCEs 26 confidentiality claim.
Projects Management, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). In my position as Principal 7
D-1
Manager, I have responsibility regarding the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) 8 Agreement between SCE, EnergySolutions Services, Inc. (EnergySolutions), and AECOM Energy &
9 Construction, Inc. (AECOM), dated December 20, 2016 (DGC Agreement). EnergySolutions and 10 AECOM formed a joint venture known as SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS). I also am 11 familiar with the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Agreement between SCE and 12 Holtec International (ISFSI Agreement), dated December 5, 2015. I had responsibility for overseeing 13 and reviewing Exhibits SCE-03 and SCE-05, which contain certain confidential information 14 pertaining to the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement. Thomas J. Palmisano, Vice President of 15 SONGS Decommissioning and Chief Nuclear Officer, delegated authority to me to sign this 16 declaration regarding the confidentiality of this information, as described below.
17
: 2. I am making this declaration in accordance with the instructions set forth in Decision 16-18 08-024 and Decision 17-09-023 of R. 14-11-001, which were issued August 25, 2016, and September 19 28, 2017, respectively, and govern the submission of confidential documents to the Commission.
20
: 3. I have personal knowledge of the facts and representations herein and, if called upon to 21 testify, could and would do so, except for those facts expressly stated to be based upon information 22 and belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true.
23
: 4. Listed below are the data for which SCE is seeking confidential protection and the basis 24 for SCEs confidentiality request. Paragraphs 5-10 also provide additional reasons supporting SCEs 25 confidentiality claim.
26


Location of                                                                 Basis for SCEs Pages         Description of Information Confidential                                                                Confidentiality (if available)       that is Confidential Data                                                                        Claim Exhibit SCE-03     8, 14, 20-21, 37-38     1. DGC Agreement              California Gov.
D-2 Location of Confidential Data Pages (if available)
contract terms, including      Code &sect; 6255 (the Appendix B, DCE,         decommissioning plans and      public interest pp. B-9, 18-19, 21,     pricing terms contained        served by not 23, 34-35, 45-47, 49,   therein.                      disclosing the 60-63, 65, 68-72, 74,   2. Contingency and cost-      information is
Description of Information that is Confidential Basis for SCEs Confidentiality Claim Exhibit SCE-03 8, 14, 20-21, 37-38 Appendix B, DCE, pp. B-9, 18-19, 21, 23, 34-35, 45-47, 49, 60-63, 65, 68-72, 74,
: 77.                     estimating information        clearly outweighed pertaining to the DGC          by the public Appendix C, p. C-1.     Agreement and ISFSI           interest served by Agreement.                    disclosure of the record).
: 77.
Exhibit SCE-05     34                       1. DGC Agreement               California Gov.
Appendix C, p. C-1.
contract terms, including      Code &sect; 6255 (the decommissioning plans and      public interest pricing terms contained        served by not therein.                      disclosing the information is clearly outweighed by the public interest served by disclosure of the record).
: 1. DGC Agreement contract terms, including decommissioning plans and pricing terms contained therein.
1        5. Both the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement require SCE to make reasonable efforts 2 to protect the confidentiality of the terms and conditions in the agreements. The agreements require 3 confidentiality because they contain commercially sensitive pricing terms and proprietary 4 information, such as work sequencing and scope. If this information was publicly disclosed without 5 protection, competitors, including potential vendors for decommissioning sub-contract work and 6 other activities, could mis-use the information to the detriment of SCEs customers. For example, if 7 a vendor seeking to bid on a subcontract or another activity knew the DGC Agreement or ISFSI 8 Agreement pricing terms, the vendor would have an opportunity to adjust its bid prices (e.g., the 9 vendor could bid higher than it otherwise may have bid).
: 2. Contingency and cost-estimating information pertaining to the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement.
10        6. Public release of this information could also hinder SCEs ability to obtain favorable 11 contract terms for related decommissioning work not covered under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI 12 Agreement. For example, if a vendor (who SCE has not yet contracted with for SONGS 13 decommissioning) was aware of various terms in the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, the D-2
California Gov.
Code &sect; 6255 (the public interest served by not disclosing the information is clearly outweighed by the public interest served by disclosure of the record).
Exhibit SCE-05 34
: 1. DGC Agreement contract terms, including decommissioning plans and pricing terms contained therein.
California Gov.
Code &sect; 6255 (the public interest served by not disclosing the information is clearly outweighed by the public interest served by disclosure of the record).
: 5. Both the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement require SCE to make reasonable efforts 1
to protect the confidentiality of the terms and conditions in the agreements. The agreements require 2
confidentiality because they contain commercially sensitive pricing terms and proprietary 3
information, such as work sequencing and scope. If this information was publicly disclosed without 4
protection, competitors, including potential vendors for decommissioning sub-contract work and 5
other activities, could mis-use the information to the detriment of SCEs customers. For example, if 6
a vendor seeking to bid on a subcontract or another activity knew the DGC Agreement or ISFSI 7
Agreement pricing terms, the vendor would have an opportunity to adjust its bid prices (e.g., the 8
vendor could bid higher than it otherwise may have bid).
9
: 6. Public release of this information could also hinder SCEs ability to obtain favorable 10 contract terms for related decommissioning work not covered under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI 11 Agreement. For example, if a vendor (who SCE has not yet contracted with for SONGS 12 decommissioning) was aware of various terms in the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, the 13


1 vendor could mis-use this information during contract negotiations to extract terms favorable to the 2 vendor that the vendor may not have otherwise sought.
D-3 vendor could mis-use this information during contract negotiations to extract terms favorable to the 1
3        7. Finally, it is also in the best interest of the long-term success of the SONGS 4 decommissioning project that SDS and Holtec remain commercially competitive throughout the 5 terms of the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, respectively. Both agreements are long-term 6 agreements that will require SDS and Holtecs continued performance for the next decade and 7 beyond. If information regarding the agreements was disclosed without protection, their competitors 8 could mis-use the information against them during the bidding process for other decommissioning 9 projects across the world and potentially threaten the financial health of both companies. This in 10 turn could threaten the companies ability to complete contractually required services for SONGS in 11 the future without interruption.
vendor that the vendor may not have otherwise sought.
12        8. The other category of information that SCE seeks to maintain as confidential is 13 contingency. SCE has applied various contingency amounts on the remaining decommissioning 14 work identified in the 2017 SONGS 2&3 decommissioning cost estimate (DCE) submitted in this 15 proceeding, including work to be completed under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement.
2
16 The contingency reflects SCEs judgment of potential costs, based on the technical complexity, 17 contracting status, estimating approach, and timing, of the remaining work scope. It is in SCE 18 customers interest for contingency included for the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement to be 19 protected as confidential, because the disclosure of the information without protection could allow 20 vendors to mis-use the information to the detriment of SCEs customers. For example, if a vendor 21 (including SDS, Holtec, or one of their competitors) knew the contingency SCE has applied in the 22 2017 DCE to work to be completed under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, the vendor 23 would have an opportunity to manipulate its negotiating strategy pertaining to new contracts and/or 24 change orders regarding that work (e.g., the vendor could demand higher prices than it otherwise 25 would have demanded).
: 7. Finally, it is also in the best interest of the long-term success of the SONGS 3
D-3
decommissioning project that SDS and Holtec remain commercially competitive throughout the 4
terms of the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, respectively. Both agreements are long-term 5
agreements that will require SDS and Holtecs continued performance for the next decade and 6
beyond. If information regarding the agreements was disclosed without protection, their competitors 7
could mis-use the information against them during the bidding process for other decommissioning 8
projects across the world and potentially threaten the financial health of both companies. This in 9
turn could threaten the companies ability to complete contractually required services for SONGS in 10 the future without interruption.
11
: 8. The other category of information that SCE seeks to maintain as confidential is 12 contingency. SCE has applied various contingency amounts on the remaining decommissioning 13 work identified in the 2017 SONGS 2&3 decommissioning cost estimate (DCE) submitted in this 14 proceeding, including work to be completed under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement.
15 The contingency reflects SCEs judgment of potential costs, based on the technical complexity, 16 contracting status, estimating approach, and timing, of the remaining work scope. It is in SCE 17 customers interest for contingency included for the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement to be 18 protected as confidential, because the disclosure of the information without protection could allow 19 vendors to mis-use the information to the detriment of SCEs customers. For example, if a vendor 20 (including SDS, Holtec, or one of their competitors) knew the contingency SCE has applied in the 21 2017 DCE to work to be completed under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, the vendor 22 would have an opportunity to manipulate its negotiating strategy pertaining to new contracts and/or 23 change orders regarding that work (e.g., the vendor could demand higher prices than it otherwise 24 would have demanded).
25


1          9. The confidential information identified in Paragraph 4 cannot be provided in a form that 2  can be further aggregated, redacted, summarized, masked, or otherwise protected in a manner that 3  would allow partial disclosure of the data while protecting confidential information.
D-4
4          10. For the reasons described above, the confidential information should be protected from 5  public disclosure. Information regarding the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, including the 6  pricing terms of those agreements and contingency SCE applied in the 2017 DCE for work 7  remaining under those agreements, is market sensitive information that should remain confidential 8  under GO-66-C Section 2.2(b) (unfair business advantage) and GO 66-C Section 2.8 9  (Information obtained in confidence from other than a business regulated by this Commission 10  where the disclosure would be against the public interest).
: 9. The confidential information identified in Paragraph 4 cannot be provided in a form that 1
11          I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing 12 is true and correct.
can be further aggregated, redacted, summarized, masked, or otherwise protected in a manner that 2
13          Executed on March 13, 2018 at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, near San Clemente, 14 California.
would allow partial disclosure of the data while protecting confidential information.
15                                                        /s/ Todd R. Adler 16                                                        Todd R. Adler D-4
3
: 10. For the reasons described above, the confidential information should be protected from 4
public disclosure. Information regarding the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, including the 5
pricing terms of those agreements and contingency SCE applied in the 2017 DCE for work 6
remaining under those agreements, is market sensitive information that should remain confidential 7
under GO-66-C Section 2.2(b) (unfair business advantage) and GO 66-C Section 2.8 8
(Information obtained in confidence from other than a business regulated by this Commission 9
where the disclosure would be against the public interest).
10 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing 11 is true and correct.
12 Executed on March 13, 2018 at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, near San Clemente, 13 California.
14
/s/ Todd R. Adler 15 Todd R. Adler 16


Appendix E SONGS Mesa Lease and Station Easement Boundaries
Appendix E SONGS Mesa Lease and Station Easement Boundaries  


SONGS Mesa Lease and Station Easement Boundaries Parcel 5 Parcel 6 Parcel 7 Parcels 8 and 9 Plant Site 0            0.05            0.1                          0.2 I                                                                                      Miles 1 in = 0.1 miles Date: 3/12/2018 File Name: SONGS_ParcelMap_bw.mxd Version #: 03 Created By: E. Garcia Real Properties Geospatial Analysis Features depicted herein are planning level accuracy, and intended for informational purposes only.
Path: P:\\Data\\DataConfidential\\SONGS\\MiscMaps\\20150203_EasementMaps\\SONGS_ParcelMap_bw.mxd SONGS Mesa Lease and Station Easement Boundaries Date: 3/12/2018 File Name: SONGS_ParcelMap_bw.mxd Version #: 03 Created By: E. Garcia Real Properties Geospatial Analysis I
0 0.1 0.2 0.05 Miles 1 in = 0.1 miles Features depicted herein are planning level accuracy, and intended for informational purposes only.
Distances and locations may be distorted at this scale. Always consult with the proper legal documents or agencies regarding such features. Real Properties Department Thomas Bros. Maps is a registered trademark of Rand McNally & Company.
Distances and locations may be distorted at this scale. Always consult with the proper legal documents or agencies regarding such features. Real Properties Department Thomas Bros. Maps is a registered trademark of Rand McNally & Company.
Reproduced with permission granted by Rand McNally & Company. &#xa9; Rand McNally & Company.
Reproduced with permission granted by Rand McNally & Company. &#xa9; Rand McNally & Company.
All rights reserved.
All rights reserved.
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus Path: P:\Data\DataConfidential\SONGS\MiscMaps\20150203_EasementMaps\SONGS_ParcelMap_bw.mxd
Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus Parcel 5 Parcel 6 Parcel 7 Parcels 8 and 9 Plant Site
(
(


Al Bates Manager, Regulatory Affairs &
An EDISON INTERNATIONALC!.' Compll.lly ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 March 20, 2018
Oversight An EDISON INTERNATIONALC!.' Compll.lly 10 CFR 50.82 10 CFR 72.30 March 20, 2018 ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555-0001


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362, and 72-41 10 CFR 50.82(a){8)(v-vii) and 10 CFR 72.30(c)
Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362, and 72-41 10 CFR 50.82(a){8)(v-vii) and 10 CFR 72.30(c)
Decommissioning Funding Status Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation
Decommissioning Funding Status Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation  


==Dear Sir or Madam:==
==Dear Sir or Madam:==
 
Al Bates Manager, Regulatory Affairs &
As required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(c), this letter provides the status of the decommissioning funding for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (San Onofre) Units 1, 2, and 3 and the San Onofre Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) as of December 31, 2017 Based on the requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii), this information is reported on an annual basis for SONGS Units 1, 2, and 3 because the units were permanently shut down and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (DCEs)have been submitted for each of these units. In addition, based on the requirements in 10 CFR 72.30(c),
Oversight 10 CFR 50.82 10 CFR 72.30 As required by 1 O CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(c), this letter provides the status of the decommissioning funding for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (San Onofre) Units 1, 2, and 3 and the San Onofre Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) as of December 31, 2017 Based on the requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii), this information is reported on an annual basis for SONGS Units 1, 2, and 3 because the units were permanently shut down and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (DCEs)have been submitted for each of these units. In addition, based on the requirements in 10 CFR 72.30(c),
information demonstrating the adequacy of funding for the San Onofre ISFSI is reported at intervals not to exceed three years, and is included. The required information for Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, the City of Anaheim, and the City of Riverside is provided in the Enclosure.
information demonstrating the adequacy of funding for the San Onofre ISFSI is reported at intervals not to exceed three years, and is included. The required information for Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, the City of Anaheim, and the City of Riverside is provided in the Enclosure.
There are no commitments contained in this letter or its enclosure.
There are no commitments contained in this letter or its enclosure.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (949) 368-6945.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (949) 368-6945.
fboi
fboi  
                                                                                          ;vHf; 5             0   I
;vHf; 5 0 I  
                                                                                            /V!>A S~ -z_(p
/V!>A S~ -z_(p  
                                                                                                      '~(Lf--
'~(Lf--
Nrv1     S5
Nrv1 S5  


Document Control Desk                   2
Document Control Desk 2  


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2017 cc: K. Kennedy, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV M. G. Vaaler, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 W. C. Allen, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre ISFSI
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2017 cc: K. Kennedy, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV M. G. Vaaler, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 W. C. Allen, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre ISFSI  


Enclosure San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Enclosure San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2017
Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2017  


San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Line 1,602: Line 2,370:
The San Onofre ISFSI is located on the partially decommissioned site of San Onofre Unit 1, and is operated under a 10 CFR 72 General License issued to the holders of a 10 CFR 50 license.
The San Onofre ISFSI is located on the partially decommissioned site of San Onofre Unit 1, and is operated under a 10 CFR 72 General License issued to the holders of a 10 CFR 50 license.
The SONGS Unit 1 co-owners are reported as follows:
The SONGS Unit 1 co-owners are reported as follows:
Southern California Edison (SCE)           80.00 %
Southern California Edison (SCE)
San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)           20.00 %
San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) 80.00 %
20.00 %
100.00 %
100.00 %
The San Onofre Units 2 and 3 co-owners are reported as follows:
The San Onofre Units 2 and 3 co-owners are reported as follows:
Southern California Edison (SCE)           78.21 %
Southern California Edison (SCE)
San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)           20.00 %
San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)
City of Anaheim (Anaheim)                   0.00 %
City of Anaheim (Anaheim)
City of Riverside (Riverside)               1.79 %
City of Riverside (Riverside) 78.21 %
20.00 %
0.00 %
1.79 %
The decommissioning liability is shared between the current owners and former owner, Anaheim, as set forth below for each unit:
The decommissioning liability is shared between the current owners and former owner, Anaheim, as set forth below for each unit:
Unit 1                 Unit 2                Unit 3 Owner            Decommissioning       Decommissioning      Decommissioning Liabilit              Liabilit             Liability SCE                            80.00%               75.7363%             75.7475%
Owner SCE SDG&E Anaheim Riverside Unit 1 Decommissioning Liabilit 80.00%
SDG&E                          20.00%               20.0000%             20.0000%
20.00%
Anaheim                        0.00%                2.4737%              2.4625%
0.00%
Riverside                      0.00%                1.7900%              1.7900%
0.00%
Unit 2 Decommissioning Liabilit 75.7363%
20.0000%
2.4737%
1.7900%
All dollar amounts are in 100% share, 2017 dollars.
All dollar amounts are in 100% share, 2017 dollars.
: 1)     The estimated costs to decommission San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3, and the San Onofre ISFSI, including all decommissioning and spent fuel storage costs estimated to be required pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c); 10 CFR 50.54(bb);
Unit 3 Decommissioning Liability 75.7475%
and 10 CFR 72.30(b) are shown below:
20.0000%
2.4625%
1.7900%
: 1)
The estimated costs to decommission San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3, and the San Onofre ISFSI, including all decommissioning and spent fuel storage costs estimated to be required pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c); 10 CFR 50.54(bb);
and 10 CFR 72.30(b) are shown below:  


The site-specific estimates for decommissioning include the following radiological decommissioning costs associated with terminating the site license pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 75(b ); non-radiological site restoration costs; spent fuel storage costs pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(bb ); and ISFSI decommissioning costs pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30(b):
The site-specific estimates for decommissioning include the following radiological decommissioning costs associated with terminating the site license pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 75(b ); non-radiological site restoration costs; spent fuel storage costs pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(bb ); and ISFSI decommissioning costs pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30(b):
San Onofre Unit 1(1>
Estimate of License Termination Costs Less: Lie. Term. Costs during 2017 "To Go" License Termination Costs Estimate of Site Restoration Costs Less: Site Restor. Costs during 2017 "To Go" Site Restoration Costs Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs Less: Fuel Storage Costs during 2017 "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs Total Unit 1 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018 Estimate of License Termination Costs Less: Lie. Term. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" License Termination Costs Estimate of Site Restoration Costs Less: Site Restor. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" Site Restoration Costs San Onofre Unit 1 (1>
Estimate of License Termination Costs             $ 76.8 million Less: Lie. Term. Costs during 2017                 $    1.3 million "To Go" License Termination Costs                 $ 75.5 million Estimate of Site Restoration Costs                 $  92.6 million Less: Site Restor. Costs during 2017               $    0.3 million "To Go" Site Restoration Costs                     $  92.3 million Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs                     $  46.0 million Less: Fuel Storage Costs during 2017               $    0.4 million "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs                         $  45.6 million Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs           $    5.3 million Total Unit 1 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018         $ 218.7 million San Onofre Unit 2(2>
76.8 million 1.3 million 75.5 million 92.6 million 0.3 million 92.3 million 46.0 million 0.4 million 45.6 million 5.3 million
Estimate of License Termination Costs             $1,017.0 million Less: Lie. Term. Costs through 12/31/2017         $ 305.2 million "To Go" License Termination Costs                 $ 711.8 million Estimate of Site Restoration Costs                 $ 527.8 million Less: Site Restor. Costs through 12/31/2017       $ 90.5 million "To Go" Site Restoration Costs                     $ 437.3 million Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs                     $ 687.0 million Less: Fuel Storage Costs through 12/31/2017 $ 259.0 million "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs                         $ 428.0 million Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs           $    18.9 million Total Unit 2 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018         $1,596.0 million
$ 218.7 million San Onofre Unit 2(2>
$1,017.0 million
$ 305.2 million
$ 711.8 million
$ 527.8 million 90.5 million
$ 437.3 million Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs  
$ 687.0 million Less: Fuel Storage Costs through 12/31/2017 $ 259.0 million "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs  
$ 428.0 million Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs Total Unit 2 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018 18.9 million
$1,596.0 million  


San Onofre Unit 3(2)
Estimate of License Termination Costs Less: LiG. Term. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" License Termination Costs San Onofre Unit 3(2)
Estimate of License Termination Costs               $1,007.5 million Less: LiG. Term. Costs through 12/31/2017           $ 302.5 million "To Go" License Termination Costs                   $ 705.0 million Estimate of Site Restoration Costs                 $ 7 46.6 million Less: Site Restor. Costs through 12/31/2017         $ 102.2 million "To Go" Site Restoration Costs                     $ 644.4 million Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs                     $ 724.6 million Less: Fuel Storage Costs through 12/31/2017 $ 254.7 million "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs                         $ 469.9 million Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs             $  18.9 million Total Unit 3 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018           $1,838.2 million The site-specific decommissioning cost estimates for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 and the San Onofre ISFSI include: (1) the cost to perform all decommissioning activities; (2) the cost of meeting the 10 CFR 20.1402 radiological criteria for unrestricted site use; and (3) adequate contingency factors for all costs.
$1,007.5 million
: 2) Each San Onofre co-owner has established one or more external sinking trust fund accounts as provided in 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1 )(ii) for their respective shares of the San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 decommissioning obligation, which also includes the San Onofre ISFSI. The Decommissioning Trust Fund amounts remaining at the end of calendar year 2017 (net of pending Trust Fund withdrawals and estimated capital gains taxes) are:(3)( 4)(5 )
$ 302.5 million
Co-Owner             San Onofre Unit 1  San Onofre Unit 2      San Onofre Unit 3 SCE                   $ 303.5 million      $ 1, 180.4 million    $ 1,370.9 million SDG&E (5)             $ 150.5 million    $ 357.5 million       $ 412.5 million Anaheim (5)                  N/A         $     52.2 million   $    52.2 million Riverside (5)                N/A          $ 27.9 million       $   30.8 million TOTAL                $ 454.0 million     $ 1,618.0 million     $ 1,866.4 million
$ 705.0 million Estimate of Site Restoration Costs  
: 3) Each San Onofre co-owner deposits its decommissioning fund contributions into their respective external sinking fund accounts as provided in 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii). The annual amounts projected to be collected in 2018 are:
$ 7 46.6 million Less: Site Restor. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" Site Restoration Costs  
Co-Owner             San Onofre Unit 1   San Onofre Unit 2    San Onofre Unit 3 SCE                  $ 0.0 million       $     0.0 million   $     0.0 million SDG&E (5)            $ 0.0 million       $      0.0 million   $      0.0 million Anaheim (5)                N/A            $      0.0 million   $      0.0 million Riverside (5)              N/A            $      0.0 million   $      0.0 million TOTAL                  $ 0.0 million       $      0.0 million   $      0.0 million
$ 102.2 million
: 4)     The amounts spent on San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 decommissioning work performed during 2017 are summarized below:
$ 644.4 million Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs  
Cost Category       San Onofre Unit 1     San Onofre Unit 2  San Onofre Unit 3 License Term.       $  1.5 million      $ 91. 7 million    $ 88.9 million Site Restoration     $  0.9 million      $    5.5 million    $ 11.3 million Spent Fuel Storage   $   0.6 million       $ 52.3 million     $ 53.3 million ISFSI Decom.         $ 0.0 million         $ 0.0 million       $ 0.0 million TOTAL                $   3.0 million      $ 149.5 million     $ 153.5 million
$ 724.6 million Less: Fuel Storage Costs through 12/31/2017 $ 254.7 million "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs  
: 5)     The composite escalation rate and after tax investment rates of return for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 Decommissioning are summarized below:
$ 469.9 million Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs Total Unit 3 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018 18.9 million
Composite Rate       San Onofre Unit 1     San Onofre Unit 2  San Onofre Unit 3 Rate of Return              3.17%                 3.32%             3.32%
$1,838.2 million The site-specific decommissioning cost estimates for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 and the San Onofre ISFSI include: (1) the cost to perform all decommissioning activities; (2) the cost of meeting the 10 CFR 20.1402 radiological criteria for unrestricted site use; and (3) adequate contingency factors for all costs.
Escalation                  2.69%                 2.91%             2.91%
: 2)
Real Earnings Rate          0.48%                 0.41%             0.41%
Each San Onofre co-owner has established one or more external sinking trust fund accounts as provided in 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1 )(ii) for their respective shares of the San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 decommissioning obligation, which also includes the San Onofre ISFSI. The Decommissioning Trust Fund amounts remaining at the end of calendar year 2017 (net of pending Trust Fund withdrawals and estimated capital gains taxes) are:(3)(4)(5)
Co-Owner SCE SDG&E (5)
Anaheim (5)
Riverside (5)
TOTAL San Onofre Unit 1
$ 303.5 million  
$ 150.5 million N/A N/A
$ 454.0 million San Onofre Unit 2  
$ 1, 180.4 million 357.5 million 52.2 million 27.9 million  
$ 1,618.0 million San Onofre Unit 3
$ 1,370.9 million 412.5 million 52.2 million 30.8 million  
$ 1,866.4 million
: 3)
Each San Onofre co-owner deposits its decommissioning fund contributions into their respective external sinking fund accounts as provided in 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii). The annual amounts projected to be collected in 2018 are:
Co-Owner SCE SDG&E (5)
Anaheim (5)
Riverside (5)
TOTAL San Onofre Unit 1  
$ 0.0 million  
$ 0.0 million N/A N/A
$ 0.0 million San Onofre Unit 2 San Onofre Unit 3 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million
: 4)
The amounts spent on San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 decommissioning work performed during 2017 are summarized below:
Cost Category San Onofre Unit 1 License Term.
1.5 million Site Restoration 0.9 million Spent Fuel Storage $
0.6 million ISFSI Decom.
0.0 million TOTAL 3.0 million San Onofre Unit 2
$ 91. 7 million 5.5 million
$ 52.3 million 0.0 million  
$ 149.5 million San Onofre Unit 3
$ 88.9 million  
$ 11.3 million
$ 53.3 million 0.0 million  
$ 153.5 million
: 5)
The composite escalation rate and after tax investment rates of return for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 Decommissioning are summarized below:
Composite Rate Rate of Return Escalation Real Earnings Rate San Onofre Unit 1 3.17%
2.69%
0.48%
San Onofre Unit 2 3.32%
2.91%
0.41%
San Onofre Unit 3 3.32%
2.91%
0.41%
The composite investment rates of return less the composite escalation rates yield composite real earnings rates less than the 2% real rate of return allowed under 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii).
The composite investment rates of return less the composite escalation rates yield composite real earnings rates less than the 2% real rate of return allowed under 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii).
: 6)     None of the co-owners of San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 or the San Onofre ISFSI is relying on any contracts for the purposes of providing decommissioning funding pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1 )(v). There have been no modifications to the method of providing financial assurance.
: 6)
: 7)     The amounts of decommissioning funds available as of December 31, 2017 for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 License Termination, Site Restoration, Spent (Irradiated) Fuel Management, and ISFSI Decommissioning costs are shown in the tables below:(4)
None of the co-owners of San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 or the San Onofre ISFSI is relying on any contracts for the purposes of providing decommissioning funding pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1 )(v). There have been no modifications to the method of providing financial assurance.
Estimated "To Go"             Cost       12/31/2017 San Onofre Unit 1 Decommissioning       Ratios     Net Trust Balance Cost License Termination Costs             $ 75.5 million           34.5%   $ 156.7 million Site Restoration Costs               $ 92.3 million           42.2%   $ 191. 7 million Spent Fuel Management Costs           $ 45.6 million           20.8%   $ 94.6 million ISFSI Decommissioning Costs           $    5.3 million         2.4%   $ 11.0 million TOTAL                                 $ 218.7 million         100.0%   $ 454.0 million}}
: 7)
The amounts of decommissioning funds available as of December 31, 2017 for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 License Termination, Site Restoration, Spent (Irradiated) Fuel Management, and ISFSI Decommissioning costs are shown in the tables below:(4)
Estimated San Onofre Unit 1 "To Go" Cost 12/31/2017 Decommissioning Ratios Net Trust Balance Cost License Termination Costs 75.5 million 34.5%  
$ 156.7 million Site Restoration Costs 92.3 million 42.2%  
$ 191. 7 million Spent Fuel Management Costs 45.6 million 20.8%
94.6 million ISFSI Decommissioning Costs 5.3 million 2.4%
11.0 million TOTAL  
$ 218.7 million 100.0%  
$ 454.0 million}}

Latest revision as of 01:46, 2 January 2025

Public Watchdogs - NRC 2.206 Petition Exhibits 1-38, Part 11
ML19311C711
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 09/23/2014
From:
Public Watchdogs
To:
Division of Decommissioning, Uranium Recovery and Waste Programs
Cruz Z
Shared Package
ML19311C699 List:
References
Download: ML19311C711 (136)
v • d • e


Text

22

  • GTCC Disposal - Under the DOE Standard Contract, the DOE is obligated to accept 1

and dispose of spent nuclear fuel and high level waste. The courts have 2

determined that GTCC is high level waste, which DOE is obligated to accept and 3

dispose of under the DOE Standard Contract, but have stated that that does not mean 4

that the government will have to bear the cost of GTCC waste disposal alone.

5 The courts have not provided a disposal cost.35 6

develop a cyber security plan that addressed eight milestones to ensure certain digital 8

assets, such as computer and communication systems and networks, are secure and 9

protected.

10

  • California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - Under CEQA, the CSLC, as lead 11 agency, is required to evaluate the SONGS decommissioning project and prepare an 12 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in response to SCEs application to modify and 13 extend the existing CSLC lease regarding the offshore conduits. The CEQA process 14 began in 2015. The CSLC is expected to certify the EIR in late of 2018. The CCC is 15 then expected to review an application for a CDP for SONGS decommissioning based 16 on the EIR, as well as its own additional analysis. The CCC is expected to consider 17 SCEs CDP application by the end of 2018. Following the receipt of the CDP, 18 physical decommissioning of the plant can proceed.

19

  • Mesa Site Turnover - SCEs Mesa lease from the Navy consists of five parcels.36 20 Parcel 5 is on the west side of U.S. Interstate Highway 5 (I-5) and includes a security 21 station to control access to Parcels 6 and 7. Parcels 6 and 7 are located on the east 22 side of I-5 and along with Parcel 5 comprise the area known as the Mesa site. Parcels 23 8 and 9 include a parking lot and lay-down area on the west side of I-5 and abut the 24 SONGS site. SCE currently estimates that Parcels 5, 6, and 7 will be returned to the 25 35 Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. U.S., 536 F.3d 1268, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

36 See Appendix E for map of the parcel locations.

23 Navy in 2021, and Parcels 8 & 9 will be retained until the end of decommissioning.

1 As part of the process to return Parcels 5, 6, and 7 to the Navy, SCE must first assess 2

the property and remediate SONGS-caused contamination to the extent necessary to 3

obtain No Further Action Letters from the California Department of Toxic 4

Substances Control (DTSC) indicating the property is available for unrestricted use.37 5

  • Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement - In 2044, SCE will begin efforts to 6

procure a contractor for the removal of SONGS substructures and placement of 7

permanent backfill. Because the dewatering, shoring, excavation, removal, and 8

backfilling of the substructures will be a very large and specialized work scope, SCE 9

will incur the cost to undertake a competitive procurement process to identify and 10 select a specialty vendor to perform this work.

11

  • Coastal Development Permit Extensions - SCE holds a CDP for the storage of 12 SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Areva ISFSI system until November 2022, and a 13 separate CDP to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Holtec ISFSI system until 2035.

14 Therefore, the 2017 DCE assumes SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions from the 15 CCC for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 16 2022 and 2035, respectively.

17

  • ISFSI Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Settlement - In August 2017, SCE reached 18 a settlement agreement with parties who challenged the CDP, wherein SCE agreed to 19 incur up to $4.3 million (100% share, 2014 $) on commercially reasonable efforts to 20 identify an offsite location for SONGS spent fuel storage.

21

  • Future DCE Updates - Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to 22 periodically revise the DCEs to include descriptions of changes in regulation, 23 technology, and economics affecting the estimate of costs; and of additions and 24 37 On April 24, 2017, the DTSC issued a No Further Action Letter for Parcel 5. The efforts to assess and remediate contamination for Parcels 6 and 7 are ongoing. SCE continues to hold Parcel 5 because it provides access to Parcels 6 and 7.

24 deletions to nuclear facilities.38 SCE submits such DCE updates to the Commission 1

in NDCTP proceedings.

2

  • North Industrial Area (NIA) Sump Modifications - The NIA sump (located on the 3

site formerly occupied by SONGS 1) currently discharges to the SONGS 2&3 4

dilution water system. The SONGS 2&3 dilution water system will be retired by 5

SDS, and therefore the discharge pathway for the NIA sump will need to be modified.

6 The estimated costs for the Other Distributed Projects category are shown in Table IV-4 7

below:

8 Table IV-4 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE Other Distributed Projects (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)

The total estimated cost for these Other Distributed Projects in the 2017 DCE is 9

$99.6 million (100% share, 2014 $). The estimated cost for such Other Distributed Projects in the 2014 10 DCE was $72.9 million (100% share, 2014 $). Thus, the 2017 DCE includes a $26.7 million increase 11 for the Other Distributed Projects category.

12 38 Pub. Utilities Code § 8326.

Description 2017 DCE Total (2014 $)

2014 DCE Total (2014 $)

Variance 1

Other Projects 2

GTCC Disposal 40.7 50.6 (9.9) 3 Cyber Security Modifications 9.4 1.9 7.5 4

CEQA 7.9 2.7 5.2 5

Mesa Site Turnover 20.3 17.8 2.6 6

Previously Included Project Subtotal 78.3 72.9 5.4 7

8 Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 7.0 7.0 9

Coastal Development Permit Extensions 5.2 5.2 10 ISFSI CDP Settlement 4.3 4.3 11 DCE Update 3.7 3.7 12 NIA Sump Modifications 1.1 1.1 13 New Projects Subtotal 21.3 21.3 14 Other Projects Total 99.6 72.9 26.7

25 After the development of the 2014 DCE, SCE determined that the cost to complete 1

several of its Other Distributed Project work scopes would be different than estimated in 2014. For 2

example, in the 2014 DCE SCE estimated that the disposal cost for GTCC waste would be $50.6 million 3

(100% share, 2014 $) based on the highest published disposal rates for Class C low level radioactive 4

waste (LLRW). In the 2017 DCE, however, SCE assumed that the disposal cost for a canister of GTCC 5

waste would be comparable to the disposal cost for a canister of spent fuel. This resulted in an estimated 6

GTCC disposal cost in the 2017 DCE of $40.7 million39 (100% share, 2014 $), a decrease of $9.9 7

million.

8 With respect to Cyber Security-related work, the 2014 DCE included $1.9 million (100%

9 share, 2014 $) and assumed the work would be completed in 2013. At that time, SCE believed that after 10 SCE submitted the certifications of permanently ceased operations for SONGS 2&3, SCE would no 11 longer be subject to the cyber security requirements of 10 C.F.R. § 73.54. However, SCE subsequently 12 determined that the SONGS Cyber Security Plan was still required because it was described in the 13 Physical Security Plan License Condition for SONGS 2&3. Other decommissioning plants had sought 14 an exemption from the cyber security requirements, but the NRC had not yet approved those requests.

15 It was prudent for SCE to wait for the NRC to review these requests and provide further guidance prior 16 to SCE submitting an exemption request so as to avoid any protracted delays in the NRCs review 17 process. In the meantime, SCE was obligated to comply with the requirements related to performing 18 cyber security assessments, but not the more costly implementation aspects of the requirements.

19 When the NRC indicated a willingness to grant such exemption requests, SCE submitted a License 20 Amendment Request (LAR) to the NRC in June 2017, wherein SCE requested removal of the 21 requirement to fully implement the SONGS Cyber Security Plan. At the end of 2017, the NRC granted 22 approval for SONGS to remove the cyber security license condition, thus waiving the implementation 23 requirements. Prior to the NRCs granting of the exemption, SCE had expended $9.4 million40 (100%

24 39 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 188.

40 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 191.

26 share, 2014 $) to implement cyber security assessments. SCE included this recorded amount in the 2017 1

DCE, resulting in a $7.5 million increase over the amount estimated in the 2014 DCE.

2 With respect to the CEQA project, the 2017 DCE forecast $7.9 million41 (100% share, 3

2014 $). The 2014 DCE forecasted this major project at $2.7 million (100% share, 2014 $), resulting in 4

an increase of $5.2 million. The increase occurred because the time and effort required to complete this 5

activity were greater than assumed during the development of the 2014 DCE. Specifically, SCE 6

originally anticipated the CEQA review would be completed in approximately one year. Given the 7

complexity of and varied interests (Navy, local communities, environmental advocates) that must be 8

considered, SCE now anticipates that it will be nearly a four-year effort. SCE underestimated the level 9

of effort necessary to complete the CEQA review, resulting in the variance. This activity is required in 10 order to begin D&D.

11 With respect to Mesa Site Turnover project, the 2017 DCE forecast $20.3 million42 12 (100% share, 2014 $). The 2014 DCE forecasted this major project at $17.8 million (100% share, 2014 13

$), resulting in an increase of $2.6 million. The increase occurred because the time and effort required 14 to complete this activity were greater than assumed during the development of the 2014 DCE.

15 Specifically, SCE originally expected to return the property to the Navy in 2017 with limited 16 environmental characterization. Subsequently, the Navy imposed stringent remediation standards for 17 the property requiring more extensive characterization and remediation, so turnover is now expected to 18 occur in 2021. SCE must comply with the Navys requirements.

19 The remaining Other Distributed Projects were not included in the 2014 DCE because 20 their scopes emerged after the 2014 DCE was developed. SCE estimated their costs as follows:

21 Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement - The 2017 DCE includes costs of 22

$7.0 million43 (100% share, 2014 $) for a competitive bidding process to select a substructure removal 23 contractor, including the development of a Request for Proposal, proposal evaluation, and contract 24 41 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 184.

42 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 178.

43 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 190.

27 award. The estimate is approximately one-half the cost to procure a DGC for the major D&D work 1

because the scope of this effort is nearly half the scope of the DGC D&D work.

2 Coastal Development Permit (CDP) Extensions - The 2017 DCE includes costs of 3

$5.2 million44 (100% share, 2014 $) for SCE to obtain extensions for the Areva and Holtec CDPs.

4 SCE holds a CDP to construct and operate the Areva ISFSI to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel until 5

November 2022, and a separate CDP to construct and operate the Holtec ISFSI to store SONGS 2&3 6

spent fuel until 2035. The 2017 DCE assumes SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions from the CCC 7

for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 2022 and 2035, 8

respectively. SCE considered the recorded costs from past CDP applications and the complexities of the 9

anticipated issues that will require evaluation in these two CDP extensions to estimate the cost to obtain 10 these two CDP extensions.

11 ISFSI CDP Settlement - As part of the ISFSI CDP Settlement, SCE agreed to incur up to 12

$4.0 million (100% share, nominal $) on commercially reasonable efforts to identify an offsite location 13 for SONGS spent fuel storage. SCE also included $0.3 million (100% share, nominal $) for SCE 14 outside counsel legal costs to reach the settlement.45 SCE also included $0.8 million (100% share, 15 nominal $) for attorneys fees to plaintiffs counsel, as agreed to in the settlement.46 This $5.1 million 16 (100% share, nominal $) increase was unforeseeable at the time the 2014 DCE was developed.

17 This cost category was shared between SONGS 1 and SONGS 2&3. The amount allocated to SONGS 18 2&3 is $4.3 million (100% share, 2014 $). The settlement allowed SCE to proceed with transferring 19 fuel to the ISFSI. It is also reasonable for SCE to explore offsite locations for the storage of spent fuel.

20 Future DCE Updates - SCE assumes a cost of $3.7 million47 (100% share, 2014 $) to 21 develop future DCE Updates because SCE now assumes that it will use a third-party vendor to develop 22 44 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 167.

45 Given the ongoing analyses and the current uncertainty regarding the potential location and requirements for an acceptable alternative spent fuel storage site, the estimated cost to re-locate the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel to an alternative site are speculative and have not been included in the 2017 DCE.

46 Under the California Civil Procedure Code, a prevailing plaintiff in a mandamus proceeding is entitled to seek recovery of attorneys fees. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 1021.5.

47 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 182.

28 the DCE Updates instead of preparing them in-house at an average cost of approximately $0.3 million 1

(100% share, 2014 $) per update. Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to periodically 2

revise the DCEs and submit them to the Commission.

3 NIA Sump Modifications - The North Industrial Area (NIA) sump currently discharges 4

to the SONGS 2&3 dilution water system. Because SDS will remove the dilution water system, the 5

discharge path for the NIA sump must be modified. SCE provided an estimated cost of $1.1 million48 6

(100% share, 2014 $) for this work scope.

7 Relative to the 2014 DCE, the cost increases for Other Distributed Projects described 8

above are partially offset by the lower estimated cost to dispose of GTCC waste, and result in a net 9

increase of $26.7 million (100% share, 2014 $). The Commission should find the increased estimated 10 costs for the Other Distributed Projects reasonable because each of these projects is required to fulfill an 11 unavoidable regulatory requirement or a contractual obligation.

12

7.

Greater Than Class C (GTCC) Waste Storage 13 In the 2017 DCE, SCE assumes that it will be required to license and purchase ten new 14 canisters for storing and disposing of GTCC waste from SONGS 2&3 D&D activities and will use two 15 existing Areva canisters for storing GTCC waste from the spent fuel pools. In contrast, SCE assumed in 16 the 2014 DCE that it would use the ten Areva canisters that were originally fabricated for storing and 17 disposing spent fuel from SONGS 2&3. SCE made this change because, although the ten Areva 18 canisters are licensed for storing and transporting spent fuel, they are not licensed for transporting 19 GTCC waste.49 Although the radiological and physical characteristics of spent fuel would seem to 20 bound those of GTCC waste, SCE determined that the canisters may only be used for their intended (and 21 licensed) purpose, and that they would need to be re-licensed before they could be used to store and 22 transport GTCC waste. Because most of the GTCC waste generated at SONGS 2&3 will come from the 23 reactor vessel internals segmentation project, which is scheduled near the beginning of D&D activities, 24 and the time required to re-license the Areva canisters is uncertain, SCE determined that it would be 25 48 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 192.

49 The canisters can be used to store GTCC waste as long as the canister does not need to be modified. For these ten canisters, the canisters would need to be modified to store the GTCC from D&D activities.

29 imprudent to risk an unknown delay to the D&D schedule by allowing it to be constrained by an effort 1

to re-license the Areva canisters. SCE determined that it would instead be more prudent to avoid such 2

schedule uncertainties by obtaining ten new canisters that would already be licensed to store and 3

transport GTCC waste.

4 The estimated cost for GTCC storage in the 2017 DCE is $26.6 million (100% share, 5

2014 $). The 2014 DCE did not include any costs for GTCC storage. This resulted in a cost increase of 6

$26.6 million50 (100% share, 2014 $). Nevertheless, the Commission should find this estimated cost 7

increase reasonable because it will reduce the risk of substantially greater costs due to potential project 8

delays resulting from a delay to re-license the Areva canisters for GTCC waste storage and disposal.

9

8.

Plant Easement/Lease Renewals 10 SCE uses the land upon which the SONGS site is located pursuant to a grant of easement 11 executed with the Navy in 1964. This easement expires in 2024. The Navy has informed SCE that the 12 existing easement will not be renewed because the terms are outdated; therefore, a new real estate 13 authorization will be negotiated. SCE anticipates that the new real estate authorization will: (1) modify 14 land boundaries to exclude roads used by the public, exclude lands within the current easements that 15 SCE does not use, include Parcels 8 and 9, and include lands that SCE occupies that are not within the 16 current easements; and (2) include pricing that is consistent with the current fair market rental value of 17 the property. The Navy will be required to perform a limited-scope NEPA review to issue this new real 18 estate authorization. The public interest in the Navys decision, mostly due to on-site spent fuel storage, 19 may impact the extent of the Navys NEPA review effort.

20 Due to the uncertainty of how long the spent nuclear fuel would be on-site and the 21 potential for relocation of the ISFSI in 2035, the 2017 DCE conservatively assumes that SCE will have 22 to negotiate real estate authorizations with the Navy two additional times. Therefore, the next real estate 23 authorization will expire in 2035, requiring SCE to seek a renewal. It is assumed the terms and site use 24 will remain the same, and that the term will also be 10 years. Thus, the cost for this effort is estimated 25 to be less than for the previous negotiation. This effort will also require a limited-scope NEPA review.

26 50 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 169.

30 When the real estate authorization needs to be renewed again in 2045, SCE will request 1

the Navy to specify the final site restoration and substructure removal requirements. SCE currently 2

plans to commence this effort in 2040, such that the real estate authorization renewal and final site 3

restoration and substructure removal requirements would be in place by 2045. This would facilitate 4

performing the Substructure Removal civil works project during 2046-2049; and ISFSI 5

decommissioning, NRC license termination, and final site restoration during 2050-2051. Because this 6

real estate authorization renewal will identify the conditions under which the land will be returned to the 7

Navy, the Navy will be required to perform a more robust NEPA review.

8 In the 2017 DCE, the estimated cost for Plant Easement/Lease Renewals is $27.1 9

million51 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $1.4 million (100% share, 10 2014 $). This results in an increase of $25.7 million. The 2017 DCE includes costs for SCE labor, 11 contract support, Navy costs (such as consultations/review hours), surveys and mapping for three 12 distinct real estate authorizations and three corresponding NEPA reviews. At the time the 2014 DCE 13 was developed, discussions between SCE and the Navy had not yet progressed to that point that the need 14 for three such updates to the Navy real estate authorization and three NEPA reviews was identified.

15 Because each of these updates to the Navy real estate authorization and any 16 corresponding NEPA reviews will be required: (1) for SCE to fulfill the Navys requirements for 17 ongoing use of the SONGS site until SCE is ready to relinquish the land; (2) for the Navy to 18 appropriately analyze and identify the final site restoration requirements; and (3) for SCE to implement 19 the site restoration requirements to the satisfaction of the Navy, these Plant Easement/Lease Renewal 20 costs are necessary decommissioning costs. SCE based the estimate on its recent history negotiating real 21 estate matters with the Navy, as well as the costs incurred to date for SONGS real estate authorizations.

22 Recent history with the Navy regarding the Mesa lease and the switchyard indicates that SCEs 23 negotiations with the Navy will involve a lengthy and more complex undertaking than assumed in the 24 2014 DCE. The Commission, therefore, should find that these estimated costs are reasonable.

25 51 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 185-187.

31

9.

Offshore Conduits Removal 1

The 2017 DCE includes an estimated cost to perform the full removal of the 2

SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits as estimated in the 2014 DCE.

3 The 2017 DCE includes $91.6 million52 (100% share, 2014 $) to fully remove the 4

SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits. In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $96.0 million (100% share, 5

2014 $). This results in a decrease of $4.4 million. This decrease occurred because the estimated value 6

in the 2014 DCE includes a 5% adder for A&G, whereas the A&G adder is excluded from the 2017 7

DCE estimated value.

8

10.

ISFSI Demolition 9

Following the removal of all spent fuel and GTCC waste by the DOE, SCE will demolish 10 and remove the ISFSI and perform activities necessary for the final restoration of the SONGS site.

11 The 2017 DCE includes $19.2 million53 (100% share, 2014 $) for ISFSI 12 decommissioning costs. In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost was $21.1 million (100% share, 2014 $).

13 This results in a decrease of $1.9 million. At the time the 2014 DCE was prepared, the specific plans to 14 expand the ISFSI had not been defined. Later in 2014, SCE entered into a contract with Holtec to 15 expand the ISFSI. The ISFSI demolition cost in the 2017 DCE is based on a new estimate completed by 16 High Bridge Associates and reflects both the Areva and Holtec ISFSIs.

17

11.

Completed Projects 18 During the period between the permanent retirement of SONGS 2&3 on June 7, 2013, 19 and December 31, 2017, SCE completed several Distributed Projects. The following completed projects 20 are some of those already submitted to the Commission for reasonableness review:

21

  • Included in 2014 reasonableness testimony: (1) Development of the Certified Fuel 22 Handler Program; (2) Post-Fukushima Modifications; (3) Independent Spent Fuel 23 Storage Installation (ISFSI) Pad Study; and (4) Spent Fuel Pool Analyses.54 24 52 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 229.

53 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 241.

54 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2014 are explained in greater detail in A.16-03-004, Exhibit SCE-09 at pages 18-21.

32

  • Included in 2015 reasonableness testimony: (1) Nuclear Fuel Contracts 1

Cancellations; (2) Legacy Radwaste Disposal; (3) Security Programs - Security 2

Shutdown Strategy; (4) Regulatory Submittals; (5) Historical Site Assessment/Site 3

Characterization; and (6) Transition Project Modifications - Special Purpose Vehicle 4

(SPV) Feasibility Study.55 5

The following completed projects are being submitted for reasonableness review in this 6

proceeding:

7

  • Major Projects completed during 2016-2017: (1) the Spent Fuel Islanding project; 8

(2) Selection of Decommissioning General Contractor; and (3) Transition Project 9

Modifications, including the Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification, Special 10 Purpose Vehicle - Implementation, Records Retention Project, and the Simplification 11 and Streamlining Project.56 12 The following completed activity will be submitted for reasonableness review in the 2021 13 NDCTP:

14

  • Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR): Updates the current licensing basis for the 15 decommissioning configuration state of SONGS 2&3 and is a reference available for 16 reviewing decommissioning actions and plans affecting the SONGS 2&3 site.

17 The estimated costs for the Completed Projects are shown in Table IV-5 below:

18 55 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2015 are explained in greater detail in A.16-03-004, Exhibit SCE-08 at pages 26-39, and in Exhibits SCE-10 and SCE-10C.

56 The SONGS 2&3 Distributed Projects completed during 2016-2017 are explained in greater detail in A.18-03-XXX, Exhibit SCE-05.

33 Table IV-5 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE Completed Projects (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)

The total estimated cost for these Distributed Projects, as reflected in the 2017 DCE, was 1

$123.3 million57 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the total estimated cost for the SONGS 2&3 2

decommissioning-related Completed Distributed Projects completed during 2013-2017 was $98.1 3

million (100% share, 2014 $), resulting in a variance of $25.2 million more than estimated.

4 The explanations for the variances associated with each of these Distributed Projects are provided in the 5

testimony SCE provided to the Commission in its reasonableness review submittals for each of these 6

completed projects. The 2014 and 2015 completed projects are not being reviewed in this proceeding.

7 C.

Undistributed Activities 8

1.

Contracted Services 9

Contracted Services are shorter-term supplemental resources, specialty contractors and 10 consultants, third-party services, materials, and supplies that are provided on an as-needed basis to 11 support SONGS. SCE must meet several NRC regulatory requirements,58 and maintain and operate 12 SONGS to support spent nuclear fuel in the spent fuel pools and ISFSI. SCE also must meet contractual 13 obligations and provide support services (such as engineering, regulatory, financial, and custodial 14 services) for the plant and the general facility,59 as well as provide basic office services, to complete 15 57 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 1, 12, 15, 18, and 24.

58 See Exhibit SCE-01, Section 1.F.2.a, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Requirements.

59 The general facility includes SONGS office buildings, roads, parking lots, fencing, lighting, and all the services necessary to maintain the site in a condition suitable for all the activities that are needed to decommissioning the plant.

Description 2017 DCE Total (2014 $)

2014 DCE Total (2014 $)

Variance 1

2014 Reasonableness Review 0.6 0.6 (0.0) 2 2015 Reasonableness Review 93.5 76.8 16.7 3

2018 Reasonableness Review 27.2 19.2 8.0 4

Future Reasonableness Reviews 2.0 1.5 0.5 5

Completed Projects Total 123.3 98.1 25.2

34 decommissioning planning and implement decommissioning. SCE utilizes Contracted Services for 1

these purposes.

2 Contracted Services in the 2017 DCE consists of two distinct types of costs, recorded and 3

estimated:

4 3/4 June 2013-2017 recorded costs of $83.7 million (100% share, 2014 $) equaling an 5

approximate annual average of $18.6 million (100% share, 2014 $);60 and 6

3/4 2018-2051 estimated costs of $141.5 million (100% share, 2014 $) reflecting an 7

approximate annual average of $4.2 million (100% share, 2014 $).

8 The estimated cost for Contracted Services for 2018-2051 includes support activities for 9

the organizations shown in Table IV-6 below.

10 Table IV-6 Contracted Services (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)

SCE discusses each of these below:61 11 60 Recorded costs during 2014-2015 were reviewed for reasonableness in the 2015 NDCTP, A.16-03-004.

Recorded costs during 2016-2017 have been submitted for reasonableness review in this proceeding.

See Exhibit SCE-05.

61 Each of these organizations also incurs common costs for items such as employment related training, office supplies, custodial support, and employment related travel expenses.

Description 2017 DCE 2018-2051 Total (2014 $)

Annual Average Over 2018-2051 (2014 $)

1 Contracted Services (2018-2051) 2 Decommissioning Oversight 50.9 1.5 3

Maintenance and Work Control 31.3 0.9 4

Nuclear Regulatory Affairs and Nuclear Oversight 22.7 0.7 5

Site Engineering 13.8 0.4 6

Site Management & Administration 10.7 0.3 7

Emergency Preparedness 6.3 0.2 8

Decommissioning Finance 4.8 0.2 9

Operations 1.0 0.0 10 Contracted Services (2018-2051) Total 141.5 4.2

35

  • Decommissioning Oversight - Contracted services include EPRI support, 1

document governance, engineering consulting services, estimating services for 2

supply chain, and radiation protection and environmental contract support.

3

  • Maintenance/Work Control - Service vendor support to perform preventive and 4

corrective maintenance on all electrical systems; mechanical systems; 5

instrumentation and controls systems; other plant systems still in operation; and 6

the seawall.

7

  • Nuclear Oversight/Nuclear Regulatory Affairs - Consultants to support Nuclear 8

Regulatory Affairs (NRA) interface with the NRC regarding SONGS 9

compliance with regulatory requirements, and to support Nuclear Oversights 10 execution of SONGS decommissioning quality assurance program (DQAP).

11

  • Site Engineering - Software licenses, security computer maintenance, and 12 consultants as required to resolve specific issues being faced.

13

  • Site Management and Administration - Staffing consultant to determine 14 appropriate SONGS staffing levels.

15

  • Emergency Preparedness - Contractor support for planning functions that 16 continue to be required by federal regulations as long as nuclear fuel is stored on-17 site, including periodic drills to verify the effectiveness of the SONGS emergency 18 preparedness program.

19 The total estimated cost for Contracted Services in the 2017 DCE is $225.2 million62 20 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the total estimated cost for Contracted Services was 21

$34.6 million (100% share, 2014 $). This resulted in an increase of $190.6 million. The 2014 DCE 22 assumed Contracted Services would involve only office supplies, computers, and related equipment for 23 utility staff use, based upon an assumed cost of $10,500 per year per employee. SCE utilized this 24 category more broadly for the services and activities discussed above. Therefore, there is a variance 25 62 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 287.

36 between the DCEs because the 2014 DCE did not include forecasts for this broader group of services 1

and activities.

2 SCE developed the estimated Contracted Services costs in the 2017 DCE by analyzing 3

the costs incurred for these functions in 2013-2016, and then built them up throughout the remaining 4

decommissioning schedule (2018-2051) based on the anticipated future contracted services requirements 5

for the SONGS decommissioning organization. SCE only included the costs necessary to meet its 6

regulatory requirements related to the safe storage of spent fuel on-site; and to provide services required 7

to maintain the plant and general facility. As noted above, the annual requirements going forward are 8

substantially lower than those recorded during the initial decommissioning period and reflect the 9

changed conditions, including SCEs transition of certain work activities to the DGC. The Commission 10 should find that they are reasonable.

11

2.

Service Level Agreements/A&G 12 Beginning in 2016, SONGS implemented annual intra-company Service Level 13 Agreements (SLAs) with SCE corporate service providers (e.g., HR, IT, Real Estate, Supply 14 Management, Treasurers, Environmental, and Controllers). Each SLA describes the specific 15 administrative and general (A&G) functions and services SCE provides to SONGS that support and 16 sustain the D&D activities. The SLAs meet the terms and conditions included in the Decommissioning 17 Agreement between SCE and the Participants.63 18 The 2014 DCE included an A&G adder (5.0%) that was applied to the costs of each DCE 19 line item to cover the costs of SCE corporate departments supporting SONGS decommissioning.

20 To maintain the integrity of the values referenced from the 2014 DCE in the variance explanations 21 provided elsewhere in this testimony (i.e., all other cost categories), SCE kept the 5% A&G adder with 22 each DCE line item in Table IV-2 above. This results in the value for the SLA/A&G in line 17 of 23 Table IV-2 being shown as zero dollars in the 2014 DCE column. Rather than comparing the 24 SLA/A&G amount included in the 2017 DCE to zero, it is more appropriate to compare it to the 25 63 Section 8.1.7.2 of the SONGS Decommissioning Agreement, dated April 23, 2015.

37 corresponding 5% A&G adder from the 2014 DCE. The number SCE calculated for the corresponding 1

5% A&G adder from the 2014 DCE for the period 2016-2051 is $160.8 million (100% share, 2014 $).

2 The 2017 DCE incorporated the SLA costs to replace the A&G adders during the 2016-3 2028 period. Beginning in 2029, the 2017 DCE resumes applying the 5% A&G adder to all remaining 4

decommissioning costs until project completion in 2051. Under this approach, the 2017 DCE estimates 5

the cost of these SCE corporate functions at $168.2 million64 (100% share, 2014 $), an increase of $7.4 6

million, in comparison to the corresponding 5% adder noted above. Using the combination of SLAs and 7

A&G adder provides greater transparency and certainty of costs for the benefit of Participant oversight 8

and project cost control. The Commission should find the estimated costs for the SLAs/A&G adder 9

reasonable because they more accurately reflect the anticipated costs for these corporate support 10 functions.

11

3.

DGC Staffing 12 DGC staff consists of SDS personnel who provide the project management of the D&D 13 work being performed by SDS, and manage/perform the programs and functions transferred from SCE 14 to SDS. Their project management function involves the continued planning, scheduling, and 15 monitoring of the D&D work as timely as possible while maintaining a safe work environment. It also 16 includes contracting with third party specialty vendors to complete specific tasks (e.g. RVI 17 segmentation), and administering those contracts. SCE provides oversight of SDSs project 18 management. This division of labor allows SDS and SCE to utilize their core competencies to complete 19 the work in an efficient manner - SDSs expertise in deconstructing facilities and SCEs oversight role.

20 This cost category also includes staffing for a DGC that will be required during substructure removal 21 and ISFSI D&D/final site restoration to be performed during 2046-2051.

22 In the 2017 DCE, the estimated cost for DGC Staffing is $

65 (100% share, 23 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, the estimated cost for DGC Staffing was $423.6 million (100% share, 2014 24 64 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 381.

65 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, lines 155 and 386.

38

$). This resulted in a decrease of $

million. This primarily reflects the result of the competitive 1

procurement process that resulted in the selection of SDS.

2

4.

Labor-Staffing 3

SCE records costs for the SONGS utility staff and security force as undistributed labor.

4 The SONGS utility staff performs various decommissioning activities relating to state and federal 5

regulatory requirements, external communications with stakeholders, and strategic planning and 6

analysis. The utility staffs activities include complying with existing technical specifications; ensuring 7

the health and safety of the workers and the public; planning and preparing the facility for 8

decommissioning; retiring plant systems to minimize or eliminate costs; and keeping the public and 9

stakeholders informed on decommissioning progress. The security force protects SONGS in accordance 10 with NRC regulations 10 C.F.R. § 73 and 10 C.F.R. § 50.54, and has been sized to meet the current 11 design basis threat assessment, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 73.

12 In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates that Labor-Staffing costs will be $986.2 million66 13 (100% share, 2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, SCE estimated that Labor-Staffing costs would be $1,029.4 14 million (100% share, 2014 $). This resulted in a decrease of $43.2 million (100% share, 2014 $) relative 15 to the 2014 DCE. Now that SCE has four plus years of experience with the planning of 16 decommissioning, it is better able to identify the required staffing to safely carry out the 17 decommissioning of SONGS 2&3 and oversight of its contractors. The estimated staffing levels in the 18 2017 DCE were developed through a collaborative process between SONGS executive managers and 19 Kenrich. The staffing levels were subsequently vetted by ABZ. The Commission should find these 20 costs reasonable as they reflect the additional experience SCE has gained, have been reviewed by an 21 industry expert, and represent a well-supported estimate of the staffing levels required going forward.

22

5.

All Other Non-Labor 23 Non-Labor costs include a wide range of decommissioning activities and obligations, 24 including the following:

25 66 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 265.

39

  • Site Lease and Easement Expenses - SCE will be required to make annual easement 1

and lease payments to the Navy for the onshore plant site and SONGS Mesa facility 2

and to the CSLC for the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits until the easement and lease 3

agreements are terminated.

4

  • Severance - Under the Decommissioning Act, SCE is required to provide severance 5

benefits to SCE employees at SONGS whose jobs are eliminated as a result of the 6

permanent retirement of SONGS.

7

  • Energy - SCE must purchase electrical energy at retail rates to power the SONGS 8

site.

9

  • Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste to DOE - Under the DOE Standard Contract, 10 SCE is responsible for the cost to transfer spent fuel canisters from the ISFSI and 11 loading them into DOE shipping containers on-site, and then onto the DOEs 12 transportation device.

13

  • Information Technology - SCE will be required to incur software and network 14 licenses, pay network service providers, and provide internal technical support to site 15 personnel at levels commensurate with site staffing until decommissioning is 16 completed.

17

  • Third Party Legal - SCE retains outside counsel as necessary to handle legal matters 18 that require specific expertise or additional resources.

19

23

26

40

  • Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies - After SDS completes the major D&D work, 1

SCE will re-assume responsibility for providing health physics supplies as required to 2

support the ISFSI-only staff.

3

  • Community Engagement Panel - SCE has chartered a panel consisting of a group of 4

representatives from surrounding cities and counties to serve as a conduit of 5

information to the public and other stakeholders regarding decommissioning that 6

seeks to educate and explain SONGS decommissioning matters of interest to the local 7

public. SCE incurs costs to conduct quarterly CEP meetings at venues in the vicinity 8

of SONGS.

9

  • Environmental Permits and Fees - SONGS must comply with a variety of 10 environmental regulations and maintain several environmental permits that will 11 require periodic payments of fees.

12

15

  • Security Related Expenses - As long as spent fuel remains on-site, the SONGS 16 security force will continue to require uniforms, weapons, ammunition, other supplies 17 and equipment, as well as background investigations, training, and vendor support.

18

  • DGC Executive Oversight Committee - a five person committee that provides 19 oversight and resolves contractual issues regarding the SDS contract. SCE and SDS 20 share the cost of three independent members on the committee.

21

  • Insurance - NRC regulations require SCE to maintain minimum levels of nuclear 22 liability and property insurance until the spent fuel is removed from the SONGS site.

23 SCE also maintains general liability insurance and excess workers compensation 24 insurance.

25

41

  • Association Fees and Expenses - NEI membership fees, and costs related to an 1

external Nuclear Oversight Board (NOB) and an outside advisor to SCEs Internal 2

Nuclear Management Group (INMG).

3

4

  • Office Space - During major D&D activities, SDS will demolish all existing office 5

space on the SONGS site and provide temporary office space as necessary.

6 After Major D&D is completed, SCE will need to provide office space for the 7

remaining employees.

8

  • Decommissioning Advisor - One or more outside consultants who provide subject 9

matter expertise regarding decommissioning regulatory issues, spent fuel storage, and 10 project management.

11

  • Ground Water Monitoring - SCE will be required to periodically sample, analyze, 12 and monitor the ground water beneath the SONGS site.

13 The estimated costs for Non-Labor are shown in Table IV-7 below:

14

42 Table IV-7 Reconciliation of 2017 DCE to 2014 DCE All Other Non-Labor (100% Share, Millions of 2014 $)

In the 2017 DCE, Other Non-Labor costs are estimated at $623.6 million67 (100% share, 1

2014 $). In the 2014 DCE, Other Non-Labor costs were estimated at $659.6 million (100% share, 2

67 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 375 (minus line 287 Contracted Services costs, which are discussed separately in Section IV.C.1).

Description 2017 DCE Total (2014 $)

2014 DCE Total (2014 $)

Variance 1

Non-Labor 2

Site Lease and Easement Expenses 97.5 19.5 78.0 3

Severance 121.0 170.8 (49.8) 4 Energy 84.7 50.2 34.5 5

Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 30.6 30.6 6

Information Technology 31.9 6.6 25.3 7

Third Party Legal 23.8 23.8 8

Emergency Preparedness Fees 48.3 25.8 22.5 9

NRC Fees 31.2 53.6 (22.4) 10 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 3.7 25.8 (22.1) 11 Community Engagement Panel 12.5 34.0 (21.5) 12 Environmental Permits and Fees 6.7 27.1 (20.4) 13 ISFSI Aging Management 15.3 15.3 14 Security Related Expenses 11.8 18.8 (7.0) 15 DGC Executive Oversight Committee 3.7 3.7 16 Insurance 63.7 67.3 (3.6) 17 Association Fees and Expenses 8.6 11.0 (2.4) 18 Water 16.5 14.5 2.0 19 Office Space 1.7 1.7 20 Decommissioning Advisor 9.9 11.4 (1.5) 21 Ground Water Monitoring 0.5 0.5 22 Property Tax 74.7 (74.7) 23 DGC Non-Labor 35.9 (35.9) 24 Spent Fuel Maintenance 7.4 (7.4) 25 DAW Disposal 3.9 (3.9) 26 Tools and Equipment 1.3 (1.3) 27 Non-Labor Total 623.6 659.6 (36.0)

43 2014 $). This resulted in a decrease of $36.0 million. This net decrease reflects numerous offsetting 1

increases and decreases as explained below:68 2

  • Site Lease and Easement Expenses - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $97.5 million69 3

(100% share, 2014 $) for site lease and easement expenses, compared with $19.5 4

million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $78.0 5

million. SCE expects payments to the Navy to increase after the easement is 6

renegotiated and the Navy resets the fees based on the current fair market rental value 7

of the property.

8

  • Severance - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $121.0 million70 (100% share, 2014 $)

9 for employee severance costs, compared with $170.8 million (100% share, 2014 $) in 10 the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of $49.8 million. SCE expects decreased 11 severance costs because it has incurred lower than anticipated payouts to previously 12 terminated SONGS employees. In addition, because many employees were 13 reassigned to other positions within the company, they are no longer eligible for 14 SONGS severance benefits.

15

  • Energy - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $84.7 million71 (100% share, 2014 $) for 16 energy costs compared with $50.2 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE, 17 resulting in an increase of $34.5 million. This variance reflects an updated forecast of 18 energy usage levels (at retail energy rates) during 2019-2028 based upon how SDS 19 plans to perform D&D.

20

  • Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste to DOE - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates that 21 the cost to transfer spent fuel canisters from the ISFSI into DOE shipping containers 22 68 SCE is not providing variance analyses for variances $7.0 million or when the 2017 DCE did not include costs for items included in the 2014 DCE.

69 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 358.

70 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 353.

71 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 308.

44 on-site, and then onto the DOEs transportation device, will be $30.6 million72 (100%

1 share, 2014 $). The 2014 DCE did not include a line item for this cost.

2

  • Information Technology - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $31.9 million73 (100%

3 share, 2014 $) for IT costs, compared with $6.6 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 4

2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $25.3 million. The increased cost is due in 5

part to some one-time payments to network service providers in 2018. After payment 6

of these costs, SCE expects that ongoing support costs will be reduced after 2019.

7

  • Third Party Legal - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $23.8 million74 (100% share, 8

2014 $) for third party legal expenses. This variance occurred because the 2014 DCE 9

did not forecast these services as direct costs, but instead assumed that the costs were 10 a part of overheads.75 The services provided by outside legal counsel are required to 11 perform normal business functions as well as tasks required by the NRC, and state 12 and local agencies.

13

  • Emergency Preparedness Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $48.3 million76 14 (100% share, 2014 $) for emergency preparedness fees, compared with $25.8million 15 (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in an increase of $22.5 million.

16 In the 2017 DCE, SCE anticipates that it will continue to incur emergency 17 preparedness fees pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with local 18 jurisdictional authorities until all spent fuel is removed from the SONGS site versus 19 the assumption in the 2014 DCE that such payments would terminate when the spent 20 fuel was removed from the pools.

21 72 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 361.

73 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 325.

74 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 336.

75 Corporate support is provided by SCE from organizations other than SONGS (e.g., legal, treasurers, finance, IT, supply chain).

76 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 303.

45

  • Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $3.7 1

million77 (100% share, 2014 $) for utility staff health physics supplies, compared with 2

$25.8 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of 3

$22.1 million. The decreased cost occurred because SDS will be performing the 4

health physics functions for the major D&D work, and incurring the cost of its health 5

physics supplies. SCE will re-assume responsibility for providing health physics 6

supplies after the major D&D work is completed, as required to support the ISFSI-7 only staff.

8

  • Community Engagement Panel (CEP) - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $12.5 9

million78 (100% share, 2014 $) for Community Engagement Panel expenses, 10 compared with $34.0 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in 11 a decrease of $21.5 million. The decreased cost occurred because SCE has incurred 12 lower CEP costs than estimated in the 2014 DCE and expects similar CEP 13 expenditures in the future.

14

  • NRC Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $31.2 million79 (100% share, 2014 $)

15 for NRC fees, compared with $53.6 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE.

16 This resulted in a decrease of $22.4 million. The decreased estimated cost occurred 17 because the NRC reduced its 10 C.F.R. Part 171 annual license fees, and SCE expects 18 to incur lower NRC inspection costs under 10 C.F.R. Part 170 than previously 19 estimated.

20

  • Environmental Permits and Fees - In the 2017 DCE, SCE estimates $6.7 million80 21 (100% share, 2014 $) for environmental permits and fees, compared with 22

$27.1 million (100% share, 2014 $) in the 2014 DCE. This resulted in a decrease of 23

$20.4 million. The decreased estimated cost occurred primarily due to a reduction to 24 77 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 373.

78 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 280.

79 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 340.

80 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 313.

46 the annual NPDES Permit fees. Due to a reduction in the quantity of discharges from 1

the plant associated with the permanent shutdown, SCE was able to negotiate with the 2

SWRCB a reduction to the annual NPDES permit fees from $1.1 million per year to 3

$0.2 million per year. In addition to the reduced NPDES fees, the other 4

environmental fees (e.g., hazardous waste, pollution fees) were less than estimated in 5

the 2014 DCE. The 2014 DCE was prepared before the impact of decommissioning 6

on the fees assessed by various local and state agencies was determined.

7

8 share, 2014 $) for undistributed ISFSI Aging Management expenses. The 2014 DCE 9

did not include a line item for this cost.

10 The total net variance for Other Non-Labor costs is a decrease of $36.0 million (100%

11 share, 2014 $). Because these estimated costs are necessary to complete decommissioning and reflect 12 SCEs experiences throughout four plus years of decommissioning and incurring these types of costs, 13 the Commission should find these estimated costs reasonable.

14 81 See 2017 DCE, Appendix C, Table 2, line 270.

47 V.

1 CONCLUSION 2

The 2017 DCE estimates that the total cost to decommission SONGS 2&3 will be $4,479 million 3

(100% share, 2014 $), an increase of approximately 1.5% over the 2014 DCE that the Commission 4

found reasonable in D.16-04-019.

5 In Chapter II of this testimony, SCE presented a detailed discussion of the methodology by 6

which the 2017 DCE was developed and the bases for its underlying assumptions. SCE also explained 7

that due to the existence of contract pricing for much of the decommissioning work, SCE was able to 8

reduce the overall contingency factor of the 2017 DCE from 25% to 17%. In Chapter III, SCE presented 9

the testimony of Mr. Nicholas Capik, the Managing Director of ABZ Incorporated, a major provider of 10 decommissioning cost estimates for U.S. nuclear facilities. Mr. Capik described the independent review 11 that he performed regarding the completeness and accuracy of the 2017 DCE. In Chapter IV, SCE 12 provided a detailed reconciliation of the 2017 DCE to the 2014 DCE, including detailed discussions of 13 significant cost changes between the two estimates.

14 Given SCEs thorough and detailed explanation of the 2017 DCE, SCE has met its burden to 15 demonstrate that the 2017 DCE is a reasonable estimate of SONGS 2&3 decommissioning costs, and 16 provides an appropriate basis for the Commission to evaluate the reasonableness of the 17 decommissioning costs. The Commission, therefore, should find the 2017 SONGS 2&3 DCE to be 18 reasonable.

19

Appendix A Witness Qualifications

A-1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY 1

QUALIFICATIONS AND PREPARED TESTIMONY 2

OF JOSE LUIS PEREZ 3

Q.

Please state your name and business address for the record.

4 A.

My name is Jose Luis Perez, and my business address is 2244 Walnut Grove Ave, Rosemead, 5

CA 91770.

6 Q.

Briefly describe your present responsibilities at the Southern California Edison Company.

7 A.

I am a Principal Manager, Nuclear CPUC Regulatory Affairs and Compliance, in the Regulatory 8

Affairs Organization responsible for CPUC regulatory activities and financial planning &

9 analysis for SONGS issues.

10 Q.

Briefly describe your educational and professional background.

11 A.

I earned an MBA from the University of California, Irvine in 1997. I earned a Bachelor of 12 Science Degree in Civil Engineering from California State University, Long Beach in 1977. I 13 am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of California. Since joining Edison in 1982, I 14 have held various management positions in nuclear generation business, finance, regulatory 15 affairs, planning & strategy, and project controls organizations. In addition, I have managed 16 various projects, including SONGS 1 decommissioning shortly after permanent shutdown and 17 industry restructuring financial analysis. Prior to joining Edison, my professional background 18 included various home office and jobsite positions in the civil engineering, nuclear power plant 19 start-up, and project controls organizations of Bechtel Power Corporation and the collection and 20 analysis of construction cost data for publication in cost estimating manuals for Marshall and 21 Swift Publications.

22 Q.

What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?

23 A.

The purpose of my testimony in this proceeding is to sponsor Exhibit SCE-03: Testimony On 24 The 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for SONGS 2&3, as identified in the Table of 25 Contents thereto.

26

A-2 Q.

Was this material prepared by you or under your supervision?

1 A.

Yes, it was.

2 Q.

Insofar as this material is factual in nature, do you believe it to be correct?

3 A.

Yes, I do.

4 Q.

Insofar as this material is in the nature of opinion or judgment, does it represent your best 5

judgment?

6 A.

Yes, it does.

7 Q.

Does this conclude your qualifications and prepared testimony?

8 A.

Yes, it does.

9

A-3 ABZ, INCORPORATED 1

QUALIFICATIONS AND PREPARED TESTIMONY 2

OF NICHOLAS J. CAPIK 3

Q.

Please state your name and business address for the record.

4 A.

My name is Nicholas Joseph Capik, and my business address is 4451 Brookfield Corporate 5

Drive, Suite 107, Chantilly, VA 20151.

6 Q.

Who is your current employer?

7 A.

ABZ, Incorporated.

8 Q.

Briefly describe your present responsibilities at ABZ.

9 A.

I am a Managing Director of ABZ. In that role, I am responsible for the management and 10 execution of numerous ABZ projects performed for the nuclear industry.

11 Q.

Briefly describe your educational and professional background.

12 A.

I earned an BS in Mathematics from the Pennsylvania State University in 1983. I completed the 13 Navy Nuclear Training Program in 1985. I served in the U.S. Navy from 1983 through 1991.

14 Since 1991, I have been employed at ABZ. At ABZ, I have performed cost estimates for over 40 15 clients related to due diligence, decommissioning, accident cleanup, and site restoration. In this 16 role, I was responsible for the development of assumptions, the selection of scenarios, the 17 preparation of studies, and the presentation of results. I have supported litigation related to spent 18 fuel storage, and tax issues related to decommissioning. I have had oversight and involvement of 19 decommissioning activities at several nuclear facilities.

20 Q.

What is the purpose of your testimony in this proceeding?

21 A.

The purpose of my testimony in this proceeding is to sponsor portions of Exhibit SCE-03:

22 Testimony On The 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate for SONGS 2&3, as identified in the 23 Table of Contents thereto.

24 Q.

Was this material prepared by you?

25 A.

Yes, it was.

26 Q.

Insofar as this material is factual in nature, do you believe it to be correct?

27

A-4 A.

Yes, I do.

1

Appendix B Decommissioning Cost Estimate - Confidential

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 & 3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Prepared For:

Southern California Edison 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, CA 91770 Prepared By:

The Kenrich Group LLC 1919 M Street, NW Suite 620 Washington, DC 20036 January 26, 2018 Revised March 8, 2018 Christopher F. Tierney Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION OF MINOR REVISION Revision Number: 1 Effective Date: March 8, 2018 The revisions made to the 2017 SONGS 2&3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate are minor in nature and do not revise or otherwise impact the content or results of the cost estimate.

Item 1 - The Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule in Appendix A has been revised to correct the number of Units 2 & 3 canisters transferred to the ISFSI.

Item 2 - Revised an activity description in Appendix B, Detailed Project Schedule.

Item 3 - Within Appendix C, Detailed Cost Tables, the notes to Appendix C have been attached.

Item 4 - The line numbers in Table 10, Utility & Security Force Average Staffing By Period, have been corrected.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate i

TABLE OF CONTENTS I.

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

.............................................................................................................. 1 II.

INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................ 2 A.

Purpose And Scope Of 2017 DCE......................................................................................................... 2 B.

Regulatory Framework........................................................................................................................... 5 C.

SONGS Decommissioning Background................................................................................................ 5 D.

The Kenrich Group................................................................................................................................ 6 III.

SUMMARY

OF THE 2017 DCE.................................................................................................... 7 A.

General Approach.................................................................................................................................. 7 B.

EnergySolutions 2014 DCE...................................................................................................................7 C.

2017 DCE Structure............................................................................................................................... 9 IV.

SUMMARY

OF 2017 DCE COSTS AND SCHEDULE............................................................. 12 A.

Summary Of 2017 DCE Recorded And Estimated Costs....................................................................12 B.

Summary Of 2017 DCE By Period......................................................................................................13 V.

BASES OF ESTIMATE AND KEY ASSUMPTIONS............................................................... 15 A.

General Principles................................................................................................................................15 B.

Key Facts And Assumptions................................................................................................................15 C.

Project Schedule...................................................................................................................................19 D.

Distributed Costs..................................................................................................................................19 1.

Completed Projects...................................................................................................................19 2.

ISFSI And Fuel Transfer Operations.........................................................................................20 3.

Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, And Disposal..................................................21 4.

Substructure Removal................................................................................................................23 5.

Offshore Conduit Removal........................................................................................................24 6.

ISFSI Demolition.......................................................................................................................24 7.

Final Site Restoration................................................................................................................24 8.

Other Distributed Projects........................................................................................................25 E.

Undistributed Costs..............................................................................................................................28 1.

Decommissioning Staffing.........................................................................................................30 2.

Undistributed Non-Labor Costs................................................................................................33 3.

Service Level Agreements For Administrative & General Expenses.........................................40 4.

DGC Staffing.............................................................................................................................40 F.

2017 DCE Costs By NRC Cost Category............................................................................................41 G.

Contingency.........................................................................................................................................42 VI.

ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROJECT SCHEDULE......................... 44 VII. WASTE DISPOSAL...................................................................................................................... 46 VIII. REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 48

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate ii TABLES TABLE 1 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY TABLE 2

SUMMARY

OF 2017 DCE TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (NOMINAL/2017$)

TABLE 4

SUMMARY

OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (2014$)

TABLE 5 ISFSI & FUEL TRANSFER OPERATIONS ESTIMATE TABLE 6 SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ESTIMATE TABLE 7 OTHER DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS ESTIMATE TABLE 8 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$)

TABLE 9 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (2014$)

TABLE 10 UTILITY & SECURITY FORCE AVERAGE STAFFING BY PERIOD TABLE 11 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$)

TABLE 12 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (2014$)

TABLE 13 UNDISTRIBUTED NON-LABOR COST ESTIMATE TABLE 14 SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (A&G) COST ESTIMATE TABLE 15 2017 DCE COSTS BY NRC COST CATEGORY TABLE 16 CONTINGENCY FACTORS APPLIED IN 2017 DCE TABLE 17 CONTINGENCY INCLUDED IN THE SONGS 2&3 2017 DCE TABLE 18 REMAINING WASTE DISPOSAL QUANTITIES FIGURES FIGURE 1 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY FIGURE 2 ALIGNMENT OF 2017 DCE PERIODS TO DECOMMISSIONING MILESTONES APPENDICES APPENDIX A SPENT FUEL SHIPPING SCHEDULE APPENDIX B DETAILED PROJECT SCHEDULE APPENDIX C DETAILED COST TABLES APPENDIX D ANNUAL CASH FLOW TABLES BY NRC COST CATEGORY APPENDIX E SHARE OF LIABILITY FOR SONGS PARTICIPANTS

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate iii Acronyms and Abbreviations APCD Air Pollution Control District CCC California Coastal Commission CoC Certificate of Compliance CDP Coastal Development Permit CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CEP Community Engagement Panel CFR Code of Federal Regulations CPUC California Public Utilities Commission CSLC California State Lands Commission D&D Decontamination & Dismantlement DCE Decommissioning Cost Estimate DGC Decommissioning General Contractor DOE U.S. Department of Energy DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control EIR/EIS Environmental Impact Report/Statement GTCC Greater Than Class C HP Health Physics INMG SCE Internal Nuclear Management Group ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation LLC Limited Liability Company LLRW Low-Level Radioactive Waste NDCTP Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding NEI Nuclear Energy Institute NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NIA North Industrial Area NOB Nuclear Oversight Board NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PG&E Pacific Gas and Electric Company PSDAR Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report SAR Safety Analysis Report SCE Southern California Edison Company SDS SONGS DecommissioningSolutions SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station WBS Work Breakdown Structure

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 1

I.

Executive Summary The 2017 San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 (SONGS 2&3)

Decommissioning Cost Estimate (2017 DCE) has been prepared by the Kenrich Group LLC1 (Kenrich) for Southern California Edison Company (SCE).2 ABZ, Inc. (ABZ) also performed an independent review of the 2017 DCE.

The 2017 DCE utilizes the same Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and selected distributed cost estimates included in the 2014 SONGS 2&3 DCE (2014 DCE) prepared by EnergySolutions, and essentially is an update to that DCE. The 2017 DCE will be submitted for review by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in the 2018 Nuclear Decommissioning Cost Triennial Proceeding (NDCTP). SCE will also submit certain information contained in the 2017 DCE to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for its review.3 The 2017 DCE incorporates pricing from two significant contracts SCE has entered into for SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. In December 2014, SCE awarded a contract to Holtec International, Inc. (Holtec) to expand the SONGS Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) and transfer fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI (ISFSI Expansion and Fuel Transfer Operations contract). In December 2016, SCE entered into a contract with the companies that have formed a joint venture called SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS)4, who will serve as the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) for major decontamination and dismantlement (D&D) activities. The ISFSI expansion project is in process, with transfer of spent fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI planned to commence in 2018.

SDS initially mobilized in January 2017, and is continuing to develop decommissioning plans and schedule. The DGC is currently expected to begin physical work in January 2019, following the approval of a Coastal Development Permit (CDP) by the California Coastal Commission (CCC). The 2017 DCE incorporates the pricing from both of these contracts.

In addition, the 2017 DCE incorporates and reflects recorded costs, new information, and experience gained from decommissioning activities SCE has completed since June 2013. Since announcing its decision in June 2013 to permanently retire SONGS 2&3, SCE has commenced preliminary decommissioning planning and performed other significant preparatory activities for 1 Kenrich is a national management consulting firm with significant experience in power plant construction and decommissioning and in the energy industry more broadly in the United States and internationally.

2 Per the SONGS Decommissioning Agreement dated April 23, 2015, Southern California Edison is currently the Decommissioning Agent acting on behalf of itself and the three other SONGS 2&3 Participants, including San Diego Electric & Gas Company, the City of Riverside, and the City of Anaheim.

3 In accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(8)(v), the licensee must annually submit to the NRC by March 31 a financial assurance status report.

4 The contract is between Southern California Edison Company and EnergySolutions Services, Inc. and AECOM Energy & Construction, Inc., together the contractor, and referred to herein as SDS.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 2

SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. The 2017 DCE incorporates recorded costs through September 2017 associated with these efforts.

The 2017 DCE for SONGS 2&3 is $4.702 billion in Nominal/2017 dollars. The 2014 DCE was $4.411 billion in 2014 dollars. For purposes of comparison to the 2014 DCE, the 2017 DCE expressed in 2014 dollars is $4.479 billion, which results in an approximate $68 million variance (less than 2%) between the two DCEs.

II.

Introduction A.

Purpose And Scope Of 2017 DCE In accordance with the California Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning Act of 1985 (Act),

SCE is required by the CPUC to update the SONGS 2&3 DCE every three years in connection with the NDCTP. The DCE is reviewed by the CPUC to determine the sufficiency of SCEs and San Diego Gas & Electric Companys (SDG&E) nuclear decommissioning trust funds, and the amount of customer contributions to those trust funds, if any are required. The DCE is also used in subsequent CPUC reasonableness reviews of actual decommissioning costs.

On June 7, 2013, SCE announced its decision to cease power generation operations and permanently retire SONGS 2&3.5 In 2014, SCE engaged EnergySolutions to evaluate decommissioning alternatives and assist in the development of a detailed project schedule and DCE to support the preparation and submittal of a Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(4)(i), which requires that a PSDAR be submitted [to the NRC] within two years following the permanent cessation of operations.6 SCE submitted the PSDAR and 2014 DCE to the NRC on September 23, 2014 and to the CPUC on December 10, 2014.7 The CPUC approved the 2014 DCE as reasonable in Decision (D.) 16-04-019 issued on April 21, 2016.

In 2017, SCE engaged Kenrich to prepare the 2017 DCE to reflect the actual costs and updated information and experience gained from SCEs decommissioning activities completed since June 2013. The 2017 DCE will be reviewed by the CPUC for the purposes identified above. New and updated information incorporated into the 2017 DCE includes: 8 5 SONGS 1 has largely been decommissioned and the site it occupied is now referred to as the North Industrial Area, which includes the SONGS ISFSI.

6 EnergySolutions, 2014 Decommissioning Cost Analysis of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3, September 5, 2014.

7 The NRC accepted the SONGS 2&3 PSDAR and found the 2014 Units 2&3 DCE estimate of $4.411 billion to be reasonable on August 20, 2015.

8 Information in this DCE is intended to be current as of approximately September 30, 2017.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 3

x The contract pricing for the contract awarded to Holtec International, Inc.

(Holtec) for the ISFSI expansion and the transfer of spent fuel from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the ISFSI; x

Contract value for the DGC contract awarded to SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS) for the decontamination and dismantlement of SONGS 2&3, and the removal and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste off the site;9 x

Recorded costs for decommissioning activities through September 30, 2017; x

Revised U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) spent fuel acceptance date to reflect the DOEs continued failure to perform its contractual obligation to remove spent fuel from commercial nuclear reactors in the past four years; x

Revised environmental permitting approval dates based on the current permitting status and the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CCCs CDP processes; x

Revised project execution strategy to delay substructure removal until 2046; x

Updated undistributed cost projections based on historical recorded costs and revised projections; x

Updated ISFSI demolition costs to reflect the Holtec ISFSI pad; and x

Additional costs not included in the 2014 DCE.

In sum, significant components of the 2017 DCE are now based on competitively bid contracts, as well as three additional years of experience managing a decommissioning plant and overseeing decommissioning personnel. Where new information was not available, Kenrich worked with SCE personnel and third-party consultants to validate and refine the 2014 DCE cost and schedule assumptions. Table 1 and Figure 1 below provide a summary of the 2017 DCE in nominal/2017 dollars10 and in 2014 dollars.

9 See Appendix B for the schedule and activities for decontamination, and dismantlement.

10 The 2017 DCE presents recorded costs in nominal dollars and estimated (i.e., October 2017-2051) costs in 2017 dollars.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 4

TABLE 1 - 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY 11, 12

($ IN THOUSANDS)

FIGURE 1 - 2017 DCE BY UPDATE CATEGORY

($ IN MILLIONS OF 2017 DOLLARS) 11 Totals in tables throughout this report may not tie due to rounding.

12 Of the $1,183,601 (nominal dollars) in recorded costs included in the 2017 DCE, $964,996 was recorded between June 2013 and December 2016, and $218,605 was recorded between January and September 2017 ($964,996 +

$218,605 = $1,183,601).

Description 2017 DCE (Nominal/

2017$)

2017 DCE (2014$)

1 Recorded Costs (Through September 2017) 2 Remaining DGC and ISFSI Work Under Contract 3

Substructure Removal 4

ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration 5

Other Distributed Projects 6

Site Management and Oversight 7

Non-Labor and A&G 8

Total 4,702,264 4,478,566 Recorded Costs (Through September 2017)

Remaining DGC and ISFSI Work Under Contract Substructure Removal ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration Other Distributed Projects Site Management and Oversight Non-Labor and A&G

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 5

B.

Regulatory Framework SONGS 2&3 decommissioning is governed by the following NRC regulations:

1.

10 C.F.R. Part 50 License - SCE holds a 10 C.F.R. Part 50 license for SONGS 2&3.

SCE, as the license holder, must comply with all the requirements and standards of the Part 50 license. The Part 50 license authorizes SCE to store spent fuel on-site in wet storage (i.e., the spent fuel pool).

2.

10 C.F.R. Part 72 License - SCE is required to hold a 10 C.F.R. Part 72 license in order to store fuel on-site in dry storage at the ISFSI. The current ISFSI Part 72 license is a general license set forth in 10 C.F.R. § 72.210 and requires the possession of a Part 50 license.

3.

10 C.F.R. § 50.75(c) specifies the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for decommissioning planning and requires that the licensee provide adequate funding for termination of the Part 50 license.

4.

10 C.F.R. § 72.30 specifies the financial assurances and recordkeeping for decommissioning and requires that the licensee provide adequate funding for termination of the Part 72 license.

5.

10 C.F.R. § 50.54(bb) requires the licensee to submit written notification to the NRC within two years following permanent cessation of operation of the reactor or five years before expiration of the operating license(s), whichever occurs first, for review and preliminary approval of the program by which the licensee intends to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor upon expiration of the reactor operating license until title to the irradiated fuel and possession of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy for its ultimate disposal in a repository. The 2014 DCE was submitted pursuant to this requirement.

C.

SONGS Decommissioning Background SONGS is located in southern California on the shore of the Pacific Ocean, approximately 62 miles southeast of Los Angeles and 51 miles northwest of San Diego. The plant is located entirely within Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton on land owned by the U.S.

Department of the Navy (Navy), except for the offshore intake and outfall conduits. SONGS 2&3 occupy approximately 53 acres of the 84-acre SONGS site. Approximately 16 acres are occupied by the North Industrial Area (NIA), formerly the SONGS 1 site, which is where the ISFSI is located. Additional SONGS support activities occurred on Navy property across Interstate 5 from the SONGS site, referred to as the Mesa site.

SONGS 2&3 was a 2,250-megawatt nuclear generation facility consisting of two pressurized water reactors, which commenced operation in 1983 and 1984, respectively. On June 7, 2013, SCE announced plans to permanently retire SONGS 2&3. On June 12, 2013, SCE

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 6

submitted a Certification of Permanent Cessation of Power Operations to the NRC, certifying that SCE had permanently ceased power operations of SONGS 2&3, and surrendering SCEs authority to operate the units. SCE submitted to the NRC a Certification of Permanent Removal of Fuel for Unit 3 on June 28, 2013, and for Unit 2 on July 22, 2013. As a result of these submittals, SCE now holds an NRC license that does not permit power operations, but authorizes the possession of the SONGS facilities and licensed nuclear material.

As noted above, SCE has completed preliminary planning and performed other significant preparatory activities associated with SONGS 2&3 decommissioning. These activities include: (1) expanding the on-site spent fuel dry storage facility (also referred to as the ISFSI) and beginning preparations to transfer fuel from the spent fuel pools to the ISFSI; (2) planning the major decontamination, dismantlement, demolition and disposal efforts; (3) selecting a DGC to complete major portions of the decommissioning project, including the decontamination and dismantlement of SONGS 2&3, and removal and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste from the site; (4) obtaining necessary approvals of various NRC license amendments now that SONGS 2&3 is permanently retired and being decommissioned; and (5) implementing various site projects to comply with regulatory requirements and other obligations, and prepare the site for major decommissioning activities.

Along with these efforts, SCEs legal and environmental teams have been working to complete the CEQA process and obtain a CDP so that major decontamination and dismantlement work by SDS can begin.

The current Grant of Easement for SONGS from the Navy is scheduled to expire May 11, 2024. Efforts to obtain a new real estate authorization from the Navy for the plant site are ongoing, and approval for the issuance of a new real estate authorization is expected by 2024.

D.

The Kenrich Group Kenrich is a national management consulting firm with substantial experience in the public utility industry, nuclear power plant construction and decommissioning, and other commercial and public construction projects. Kenrich professionals have prepared and sponsored expert testimony with respect to cost and schedule analyses, project management, and economic damages before state and federal courts, domestic and international arbitration tribunals, and state utility commissions.

Kenrich personnel have consulted with utilities for more than 30 years on a wide range of matters, including strategic planning and financial analyses to support management decision-making, reviews and investigations by state and federal regulatory commissions, and economic damages analyses in the context of business disputes. Kenrichs consultants include accountants, financial analysts, and engineers, and the firm typically focuses on complex and detailed accounting and financial issues, as well as cost and schedule performance on major projects, including nuclear power plant construction and decommissioning.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 7

III.

Summary of the 2017 DCE A.

General Approach This 2017 DCE builds on the 2014 DCE, incorporating recorded costs through September 30, 2017; contract pricing for the ISFSI expansion contract awarded to Holtec in December 2014 and the DGC contract awarded to SDS in December 2016; site restoration costs estimated by third-party engineering firms; and revised SCE estimates for ongoing plant security and maintenance, and project oversight. Kenrich worked closely with SCE management and project oversight to develop the 2017 DCE. This DCE is generally consistent with the guidance provided in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.202, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors.

SCE retained ABZ, Incorporated (ABZ) to perform an independent review of the 2017 DCE. ABZ is a management consulting and engineering firm specializing in providing services related to decommissioning costs, scheduling, and spent fuel storage. ABZ has prepared decommissioning cost estimates for numerous nuclear plant owners, including an estimate of SONGS 2&3 decommissioning costs for SCE in 2013, shortly following the announcement of the permanent retirement of SONGS 2&3.

B.

EnergySolutions 2014 DCE In January 2014, SCE retained EnergySolutions to evaluate decommissioning alternatives and assist in the development of a detailed project schedule and DCE to support the preparation and submittal of a PSDAR in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 50.82(a)(4)(i), which requires that a PSDAR be submitted to the NRC within two years following the permanent cessation of facility operations.

The 2014 DCE included the following three cost categories:

x License Termination -- Decommissioning SONGS 2&3 to the extent required to terminate the plants operating license pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 50.75(c);

x Spent Fuel Management -- Post-shutdown management of spent fuel until acceptance by the DOE pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 50.54(bb) and ISFSI decommissioning pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 72.30; and x

Site Restoration -- Demolition of uncontaminated structures and restoration of the site in accordance with the Navy Grant of Easement and the California State Lands Commission (CSLC) requirements.

The 2014 DCE was prepared using a WBS to differentiate between these three major cost categories. The 2014 DCE included SCEs actual costs incurred from June 7, 2013 through December 31, 2013 and estimated costs thereafter.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 8

The 2014 DCE was based on the following technical approach to decommissioning:

x Prompt DECON decommissioning methodology;13 x

Decommissioning would be performed by a DGC with oversight by the SONGS participants; x

Spent fuel would be transferred from the spent fuel pools and stored in Multi-Purpose Canisters at an on-site ISFSI; and14 x

The DOE would begin accepting spent fuel from the nuclear industry in 2024 and complete the removal and acceptance of all spent fuel stored at SONGS by 2049.

A dry transfer facility would not be necessary to transfer the spent nuclear fuel canisters to DOE transport canisters.

The 2014 DCE followed the approach originally presented in the Atomic Industrial Forum/National Environmental Studies Project Report AIF/NESP-036, Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates. The report was prepared in accordance with NRC Regulatory Guide 1.202, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors. The estimate was based on compliance with current regulatory requirements and proven decommissioning technologies.

On December 10, 2014, SCE filed Application (A.)14-12-007 and submitted the 2014 SONGS DCE to the CPUC. On April 21, 2016, the CPUC issued D.16-04-019, determining that the 2014 SONGS DCE was reasonable. On August 20, 2015, the NRC accepted the PSDAR, and found the DCE to be reasonable, stating:

The NRC staff reviewed the cost estimates against the guidance in RG 1.185, Section C.3 and finds that SCEs site-specific DCE and the costs of long-term storage of spent fuel for SONGS, Units 2 and 3, are considered reasonable, are described consistent with the guidance in RG 1.185, provide sufficient details 13 DECON is one of three basic methods for decommissioning defined by the NRC. Under the DECON method, the equipment, structures, and portions of the facility and site that contain radioactive contaminants are promptly removed or decontaminated to a level that permits termination of the Part 50 license after cessation of operations.

14 The three options for long-term post-shutdown spent fuel management currently available to power plant operators are as follows: (1) wet storage consisting of continued maintenance and operation of the spent fuel pools; (2) dry storage consisting of transfer of spent fuel from the fuel pool to on-site dry storage modules after a cooling period; or (3) a combination of the two as is the present case at SONGS. Maintaining the spent fuel pool for an extended duration following cessation of operations would prevent the reduction of the Part 50 license and result in higher annual maintenance and operating costs than the dry storage alternative. Transfer of spent fuel to an ISFSI requires additional expenditures for purchase and construction of the ISFSI and dismantlement and disposal of the ISFSI following the completion of spent fuel transfer to the DOE.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 9

associated with the funding mechanisms, and meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.82(a)(4)(i).15 C.

2017 DCE Structure The 2017 DCE utilizes the WBS that was established in the 2014 DCE, 16 and is estimated in 2017 dollars. Certain comparisons of the 2014 and 2017 DCEs are provided in 2014 dollars for ease of comparison. Costs were de-escalated from 2017 dollars to 2014 dollars using escalation factors provided by SCE.

Consistent with the 2014 DCE, the 2017 DCE provides the total costs to decommission SONGS 2&3. The liability for the total decommissioning costs is shared between the SONGS participants.17 As noted above, the 2014 DCE summarized the decommissioning costs by the License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration cost categories (as generally defined by the NRC). The costs were further summarized into sequential periods within each cost category. For the 2017 DCE, Kenrich revised the periods from the 2014 DCE and established common periods that include all cost categories to better align the estimated costs with SCEs current project schedule and to simplify cost and schedule reporting.18 The 2017 DCE periods were designed to reflect the timing and completion of certain decommissioning milestones, including the completion of: (1) ISFSI fuel transfer operations; (2) mobilization and transition of various program activities (e.g. radiation protection program, maintenance, etc.) to SDS; and (3) major D&D phases of work defined in the DGC contract.19 The completion of these milestones are expected to trigger certain reductions in staffing and undistributed costs. Figure 2 illustrates how the 2017 DCE periods align to the DGC contract and the completion of fuel transfer operations.

15 August 20, 2015 letter from NRC to SCE Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Mr. Thomas J. Palmisano (ADAM Accession No.: ML15204A383) 16 The DCE line numbers in Appendix C of this report align to the line numbers in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.

The DCE line numbers in Appendix C of this report indicate the corresponding 2014 DCE: (1) NRC cost category, (2) 2014 DCE period, (3) cost type (i.e., distributed or undistributed), and (4) line number. For example, LT-2-D-2.17 in Appendix C of this DCE corresponds to License Termination Period 2, distributed cost line number 2.17 in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.

17 The share of the liability for each of the SONGS Participants is provided in Appendix E.

18 While new periods are used to summarize the costs in this DCE, the underlying cost structure remains the same as the 2014 DCE and will facilitate cost reconciliations between the two estimates.

19 The phases of work in the DGC contract are described in more detail in Section V.D.3 below.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 10 FIGURE 2 ALIGNMENT OF 2017 DCE PERIODS TO DECOMMISSIONING MILESTONES The activities in each of the 2017 DCE periods are described in more detail below.

Period 1 - Initial Activities (June 2013 - December 2016)

Period 1 began on June 7, 2013 immediately following SCEs decision to permanently retire SONGS 2&3. As the decision was made approximately nine years before the units Part 50 operating licenses would have expired, SONGSs premature retirement was unexpected. SCE spent the following six months reducing its workforce and beginning to formulate plans for decommissioning. This period includes preliminary decommissioning planning, obtaining necessary approvals of NRC license amendments, commencing the expansion of its on-site ISFSI facility, and procuring a DGC. The end of this period aligns with the selection and award of the DGC contract to SDS in December 2016.

Period 2 - Transition and Pool Storage (January 2017 - December 2018)

Period 2 began with the mobilization of SDS in January 2017 and extends through December 2018, during which time SCE will transition responsibility of D&D-related site management and support functions at SONGS to SDS. In addition, SCE will complete the CEQA process with CSLC and obtain a CDP from the CCC. The CEQA process and CDP are required for SDS to begin major decontamination and dismantlement work. Other activities during Period 2 include the ongoing expansion of the on-site ISFSI facilities, and various other smaller projects. In addition, SCE currently anticipates that Holtec will begin transferring spent fuel from the wet storage pools adjacent to the reactors into dry storage at the expanded on-site ISFSI in 2018. The fuel transfer operations will continue into Period 3.

2014 2015 2016 2017 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 Period 1 Period 2 Pd 3

Period 4 Period 5 Period 6 Period 7 Transition To D&D Dry Storage Only Civil Works Project ISFSI Demo

& FSR (Unit 1 Substructure Removal)

Major D&D 2018 2019 Fuel Pool Operations Initial Activities June 2019 Fuel Transfer Operations Complete December 2028 Partial Site Release December 2049 SONGS 2&3 Substructure Removal Complete December 2051 Termination Of License Dry Fuel Storage

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 11 Period 3 - D&D and Pool Storage (January 2019 - May 2019)

Period 3 begins with SDSs mobilization to commence the major physical work to decontaminate and dismantle SONGS 2&3. SDSs initial work during this period will primarily focus on the segmentation and packaging of reactor internals. The completion of the transfer of all fuel from the operating spent fuel pools into dry storage at the on-site ISFSI marks the end of Period 3. After the SONGS spent fuel pools are empty, related systems needed for the spent fuel pools will be retired, and otherwise applicable plant programs associated with spent fuel management will be modified, allowing SCE to further reduce SONGS staffing.

Period 4 - D&D and Dry Storage (June 2019 - December 2028)

Period 4 begins with the completion of fuel transfer operations and extends through the completion of the D&D work. Period 4 is expected to span approximately 9.6 years. This period includes the decontamination, dismantlement, demolition, removal, and waste disposal of the entire SONGS plant to approximately 3 feet below grade, with the exception of the on-site ISFSI and its associated security facilities, as well as the switchyard area. At the end of this period, SDS is expected to have completed all D&D work necessary to obtain NRC approval to reduce the Part 50 license site footprint to the ISFSI area only and to allow partial release of the SONGS site for unrestricted future use.

Period 5 - Dry Storage (January 2029 - December 2045)

During Period 5, the primary activity at SONGS will be the ongoing maintenance and security of the on-site ISFSI and the transfer of all SONGS spent fuel to the DOE. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, SCE has assumed that the DOE will begin performing its obligations nationally in 2028, which means that the DOE would begin removing the SONGS 2&3 spent nuclear fuel from the on-site ISFSI in 2034 under the pick-up rates published in the DOEs July 2004 Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report. In addition, Period 5 includes the Navys National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review process, associated with amending the SONGS real estate authorization to establish the site restoration or end state requirements for SONGS to return the property to the Navy. SCE will also initiate a Request For Proposal (RFP) process for substructure removal work.

Period 6 - Civil Works Project (January 2046 - December 2049)

Period 6 begins with a contractor mobilizing in order to perform the remaining work to restore the SONGS site for its return to the Navy. This work includes removing all onshore below-grade man-made structures, with the exception of the North Industrial Area where the on-site ISFSI is located. This work is currently expected to span approximately four years and is scheduled to be completed in December 2049. During Period 6, the DOE will continue to remove the remaining SONGS spent fuel from the ISFSI. SCE assumes all fuel is removed by the DOE by December 2049, marking the end of this period and the commencement of Period 7,

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 12 the demolition and removal of the ISFSI facilities and the final site restoration of the SONGS site.

Period 7 - ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration (January 2050 - December 2051)

After all of the spent fuel is removed from SONGS, SCE can begin the final decommissioning and site restoration activities. These activities include dismantling and disposing of the ISFSI, completing the final site restoration work, obtaining NRC approval to terminate the remaining license covering the ISFSI, and returning the property to the Navy.20 SCE projects that all decommissioning activities will be completed by 2051, approximately two years after the removal of the last spent fuel from the SONGS ISFSI.

In addition, for purposes of the 2017 DCE, SCE has assumed that the offshore intake and outfall conduits will be excavated and removed during this period.

At the end of decommissioning in 2051, all above and below ground man-made improvements, including the seawall and the offshore intake and outfall conduits, will be removed, and the site will be re-graded, re-vegetated, and returned to the Navy.

IV.

Summary Of 2017 DCE Costs And Schedule A.

Summary Of 2017 DCE Recorded And Estimated Costs SONGS has incurred $965.0 million (nominal dollars) through December 31, 2016 and estimates $3,737 million (2017 dollars) to complete decommissioning through 2051, for a total estimate of $4,702 million (Nominal/2017 dollars). The equivalent total in 2014 dollars is

$4,479 million. Table 2 below summarizes the 2017 DCE by cost category.

20 The Units 2&3 ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration scope excludes the removal of the remaining Unit 1 foundations. The scope of the removal of the Unit 1 foundations is included in the Unit 1 DCE.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 13 TABLE 2

SUMMARY

OF 2017 DCE 21 22

($ IN THOUSANDS)

B.

Summary Of 2017 DCE By Period As discussed above, the 2017 DCE periods were designed to reflect the timing and completion of key decommissioning milestones that impact the cost estimate. The table below summarizes the 2017 DCE by period.

22 The estimate to complete amounts in the tables through the report summarize period 2 through 7 costs (i.e.,

2017 - 2051), which include January through September 2017 recorded costs.

[A]

[B]

[C = A + B]

[D]

Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)

Estimate To Complete (2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)

1 Distributed Projects 2

Completed Projects 216,611 1,234 217,845 214,024 3

ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 140,047 142,385 282,432 270,210 4

Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 5

Other Projects 19,959 180,789 200,748 189,758 6

Substructure Removal 287,340 287,340 273,042 7

Offshore Conduit Removal 96,039 96,039 91,631 8

ISFSI Demolition 20,229 20,229 19,171 9

Final Site Restoration 7,267 7,267 6,905 10 Distributed Subtotal 11 12 Undistributed Activities 13 Labor-Staffing 336,628 696,304 1,032,932 986,172 14 Non-Labor 241,104 639,572 880,676 848,786 15 Service Level Agreements 10,647 166,996 177,643 168,212 16 DGC Staffing 17 Undistributed Subtotal 18 19 Total

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 14 TABLE 3 -

SUMMARY

OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)

TABLE 4 -

SUMMARY

OF 2017 DCE BY PERIOD (2014$ IN THOUSANDS)

Description Period 1 Initial Activities (Nominal $)

Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2017$)

Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2017$)

Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2017$)

Period 5 Dry Storage (2017$)

Period 6 Civil Works Project (2017$)

Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration (2017$)

Total (Nominal/

2017$)

1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4

5 Distributed Projects 6

Completed Projects 216,611 1,234 217,845 7

ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 140,047 138,943 3,442 282,432 8

Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 9

Other Projects 19,959 42,196 7,922 55,867 31,318 43,488 200,748 10 Substructure Removal 263,698 23,642 287,340 11 Offshore Conduit Removal 670 95,369 96,039 12 ISFSI Demolition 20,229 20,229 13 Final Site Restoration 7 267 7 267 14 Distributed Subtotal 15 16 Undistributed Activities 17 Labor-Staffing 336,628 125,814 22,954 284,800 172,804 75,196 14,735 1,032,932 18 Non-Labor 241,104 84,020 17,913 220,608 218,376 72,388 26,266 880,676 19 Service Level Agreements 10,647 27,510 4,518 83,094 20,521 22,210 9,143 177,643 20 DGC Staffing 21 Undistributed Subtotal 22 23 Total 4,702,264 Description Period 1 Initial Activities (2014 $)

Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2014$)

Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2014$)

Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2014$)

Period 5 Dry Storage (2014$)

Period 6 Civil Works Project (2014$)

Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration (2014$)

Total (2014$)

1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4

5 Distributed Projects 6

Completed Projects 213,032 992 214,024 7

ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 136,403 130,570 3,237 270,210 8

Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 9

Other Projects 19,580 39,699 7,455 52,611 29,481 40,932 189,758 10 Substructure Removal 250,603 22,438 273,042 11 Offshore Conduit Removal 637 90,994 91,631 12 ISFSI Demolition 19,171 19,171 13 Final Site Restoration 6,905 6,905 14 Distributed Subtotal 15 16 Undistributed Activities 17 Labor-Staffing 332,184 118,054 21,564 267,549 162,337 70,641 13,843 986,172 18 Non-Labor 239,691 79,724 17,005 210,259 208,221 68,862 25,023 848,786 19 Service Level Agreements 10,278 26,121 4,288 78,793 19,278 20,865 8,589 168,212 20 DGC Staffing 21 Undistributed Subtotal 22 23 Total 4,478,566

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 15 V.

Bases Of Estimate And Key Assumptions A.

General Principles Where available, Kenrich relied on executed contracts, actual cost data, and lessons learned from on-site performance to date. The cost estimate of decommissioning activities through the completion of the major decontamination, dismantlement, and waste disposal activities at SONGS in 2028 is based on competitively bid contracts and detailed project cost estimates prepared by SCE project managers. Kenrich worked with SCE personnel to ensure project cost estimates were reasonable and consistent with underlying key assumptions. Kenrich also worked with SCE to determine appropriate contingency factors to ensure that the total estimate remained reasonable and conservative. In addition, Kenrich incorporated project costs that were not included in the 2014 DCE, including those associated with the substantial environmental permitting efforts that are currently in process.

The majority of the cost estimates for activities after 2028, such as the substructures removal and the final site restoration are based on either the 2014 DCE values or updated estimates prepared by High Bridge Associates, experts in cost estimating.23 Consistent with industry practice, the 2014 DCE used quantity take-offs from plant drawings and Unit Cost Factors.

Kenrich worked with knowledgeable SCE personnel to prepare cost estimates for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the SONGS facilities, as well as the oversight and support of the decommissioning project. Consistent with the 2014 DCE, these indirect project costs are referred to as undistributed costs in the 2017 DCE. Such undistributed costs include Utility Staffing, Contracted Services, Energy, Site Lease expenses, among other items. Kenrich worked closely with knowledgeable SCE personnel to develop detailed cost estimates that reflect the current known regulatory and project support requirements throughout the entire decommissioning project. Kenrich ensured these cost estimates were supported, reviewed by subject matter experts, and consistent with the project schedule and other key underlying assumptions.

B.

Key Facts And Assumptions Kenrich worked closely with SCE personnel to identify, define, and support the key assumptions underlying the 2017 DCE. As part of this process, subject matter experts were interviewed and meetings were held with cross-functional teams to review and refine the 23 High Bridge Associates is a project management consulting and services company with experience supporting capital projects, decommissioning and closure projects, new build construction projects, and operating/maintenance programs in various markets. High Bridge has provided consulting and technical subject matter expert services to customers spanning Cost Estimating, Cost/Schedule Reviews, Risk Assessments, Due Diligence Evaluations, Feasibility Studies, Readiness Assessments, Contract Change Management/Claims, and Technical/Management Assessments.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 16 assumptions. Additionally, relevant supporting documents were identified and reviewed to confirm accuracy and reasonableness.

The key assumptions and general bases of estimate for the 2017 DCE are summarized below. The detailed bases for the estimated costs for specific distributed and undistributed activities are described in subsequent sections of this report.

General

1. Costs are presented in the same WBS utilized in the 2014 DCE (see Appendix C).

Distributed costs are summarized and discussed by major project, and undistributed costs are discussed by cost category.

2. Recorded costs for decommissioning activities through September 30, 2017 are included in this estimate.
3. Approximately $

billion of the SONGS decommissioning project are covered by two contracts (i.e., ISFSI expansion and fuel transfer operations with Holtec and the DGC contract with SDS). Those contract amounts are incorporated into this DCE.24 Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, and Disposal to Achieve Partial Site Release

4. The DGC contract with SDS was executed in December 2016. SDS mobilized to the SONGS site and commenced Phase I work (transition and planning) on January 9, 2017.
5. The pricing of the SDS contract generally covers two phases of work: transition and planning (Phase I) and the decontamination, dismantlement, and removal of all man-made improvements to 3 feet below grade (and or deeper as required) to reduce the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only (Phase II). In addition, SDS is expected to install backfill and perform other work as requested.
6. The CEQA review process completed by the CSLC will conclude with the issuance of an Environmental Impact Report that will be utilized by the CCC in connection with its issuance of a CDP in the last quarter of 2018. The CDP will allow physical decommissioning work to commence at SONGS. Accordingly, SDS is expected to begin Phase II work in January 2019.
7. SDSs Phase II work is estimated to be completed by December 2028, following the submission of Final Site Survey to the NRC and the approval of a partial site release, reducing the SONGS 2&3 NRC Part 50 license footprint to the ISFSI area only.25 24 Contract milestone payments are aligned with SCEs current expected project schedule.

25 SDSs Phase II work also covers non-radiological hazardous waste disposal, e.g., asbestos, chromates, lead paint, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 17

8. Following the D&D work, the SONGS plant site will be backfilled to current grade levels.

Clean material available on the SONGS plant site may be acceptable for purposes of backfill and additional required backfill material will be imported from offsite.26

9. The 2017 DCE includes costs to purchase and import backfill material from offsite.

Spent Nuclear Fuel and GTCC Waste

10. All spent fuel will be transferred from the SONGS 2&3 pools to the on-site ISFSI by June 1, 2019.
11. Greater Than Class C (GTCC) waste will be stored in twelve canisters (five for reactor internals and one for spent fuel pool hardware/contents at each unit). GTCC waste from the containment buildings (e.g., portions of the reactor vessel internals) and spent fuel pools will be loaded into canisters and the loaded canisters will be transferred to the ISFSI.
12. The DOE will remove all GTCC waste from SONGS by 2049.
13. The DOE will commence accepting spent fuel from the commercial nuclear industry in 2028.

The DOE will accept the first SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in 2034. All SONGS spent fuel will be removed from the ISFSI by 2049.

14. SCE is responsible for the loading of spent fuel and GTCC waste canisters into DOE transportation containers. (No dry transfer facility is required.)
15. GTCC disposal costs are conservatively estimated to account for potential DOE charges for acceptance of GTCC waste (i.e., in addition to the one-mill fee charged per kilowatt of generation per the Standard Contract with the DOE).

Substructure Removal Below 3 Feet Below Grade (i.e., Below 27 Feet Elevation)

16. SCE anticipates submitting an application to the Navy to amend the then current real estate authorization to seek a Navy determination of the substructure removal requirements. The Navy is expected to establish those requirements after completing a NEPA process and to include the requirements within a new or amended real estate authorization. This will define the final site release criteria for turnover of the SONGS property back to the Navy. The 26 Paragraph 12 of the Grant of Easement, U.S. Department of Navy to Southern California Edison Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, dated May 12, 1964 states, That upon termination of the easement granted herein, the Grantees at their expense may remove, and if desired by the government, shall remove any and all improvements installed or constructed hereunder and shall restore the Premises to a condition satisfactory to the Director, Southwest Division, Bureau of Yards and Docks, except that the Grantees shall not be obligated to restore any natural material cut or filled in the necessary excavation and grading of the Premises and such surrounding area within the Reservation as may have been contaminated by the operation of the Nuclear Station. Thus, the contract states that the Navy will specify the final site restoration requirements. The Navy has not yet specified its decontamination, backfill, compaction, grading, or re-vegetation requirements. The Navy is expected to establish these requirements as a part of the NEPA process and specify them within a new real estate authorization.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 18 application is currently expected to be filed in 2040, with a Navy decision by 2045. That timing may change depending upon the time frame for the DOE removal of the spent fuel.

17. The removal of substructures (i.e., man-made improvements remaining after the D&D work and reduction of the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only) is expected to begin in 2046 and be completed by December 2049. The final site restoration criteria will not be known until the Navy amends the SONGS site real estate authorization to include such criteria.

Therefore, for purposes of the 2017 DCE, it is assumed that all SONGS 2&3 substructures will be removed during 2046-2049 (Period 6) (excluding the ISFSI which will be removed in a subsequent period).27

18. The estimated costs for the substructure removal work scope included in the 2014 DCE were reviewed and updated by High Bridge Associates. High Bridge Associates validated the quantities contained in the 2014 DCE and reduced the costs for non-radioactive waste disposal (based on La Paz, Arizona disposal rates, as compared to Oregon state rates which were assumed for purposes of the 2014 DCE).28
19. All concrete and other demolition debris (including clean; i.e., non-radioactive, non-hazardous material) that is deemed by the Navy or SCE to be not suitable for purposes of backfill will be transported to and disposed at an out-of-state Class III landfill at La Paz, Arizona or other facilities as may be required.29 Cost for transporting clean scrap metal to a recycler is included in the DCE. No credit is taken for any salvage value of the scrap metal.

Conduits, ISFSI Demolition, and Final Site Restoration

20. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, it is assumed the offshore intake and outfall conduit will be removed during Period 7, ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration, and will be complete by 2050.

27 Any determination in the 2017 DCE that accounts for only partial removal of substructures would be non-conservative, arbitrary and inconsistent with the U.S. Navy easement, and without basis. If the final site restoration requirements specified in the future by the Navy allow less than complete removal of non-contaminated structures below 3 feet below grade (i.e., 27 feet elevation), then that new assumption will be incorporated into the subsequent DCE update.

29 This out-of-state disposal requirement is consistent with the Governor of the State of California Executive Order D-62-02.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 19

21. Following the complete removal of SONGS spent fuel and GTCC waste in 2049, the ISFSI and related facilities, and all remaining man-made structures (e.g., gunite walls, roads and parking lots, rail facilities) will be demolished and removed.
22. The SONGS site will be re-established to meet Navy site restoration requirements, including grading and re-vegetated.

Other

23. SCE expects to return the Mesa site to the Navy by July 31, 2021. The April 2011 lease from the Navy is known as the Mesa lease and contains five parcels. Parcels 5, 6, and 7 are associated with the Mesa site and are being returned. Parcels 8 & 9 are adjacent to the SONGS site and will be retained and incorporated into a new site lease during the real estate authorization process.

C.

Project Schedule The 2017 DCE assumes the timing for completing major activities is generally the same as the 2014 DCE, with the exception of the timing for removing the substructures below 3 feet below grade, which moved from 2031 to 2049. The schedule assumed in the 2017 DCE is as follows:

x June 1, 2019 - Fuel Transfer Operations Complete.

x December 2028 - Completion of the D&D work and receipt of NRC approval of the amendment to achieve partial site release and reduce the Part 50 License to the ISFSI area only.

x December 2049 - Completion of Substructures removal below 3 feet below grade (i.e., 27 feet elevation).

x December 2049 - All spent fuel removed from the site.

x December 2051 - Completion of ISFSI Demolition, Conduits Removal, Final Site Restoration, and Lease Termination.

D.

Distributed Costs 1.

Completed Projects Following the transition to decommissioning in June 2013, SCE began efforts to prepare the site for decommissioning and obtain necessary approvals of NRC license amendments.

During the period from June 7, 2013 to September 30, 2017, SCE began and completed projects

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 20 to implement Cold & Dark,30 perform the initial site assessment, dispose of legacy radwaste, prepare and receive approval for regulatory submittals, and select a DGC.

During this period, SCE also implemented projects that were needed to comply with regulatory requirements and other obligations. SCE began and completed projects related to Security Shutdown Strategy, Large Organism Exclusion Device Modifications, Fuel Cancellation payments, and other efforts.

Kenrich incorporated the recorded costs for the completed projects into the 2017 DCE.

SCE will support the reasonableness of costs incurred in separate filings in the 2015 and 2018 NDCTP.

2.

ISFSI And Fuel Transfer Operations Following a competitive bidding process, SCE awarded a contract to Holtec to license, design, and construct an expanded on-site ISFSI; and to supply, load, and transfer the multi-purpose canisters containing fuel assemblies, from the SONGS 2&3 spent fuel pools to the expanded ISFSI. Holtecs work scope generally includes:

x Perform engineering, procurement, and construction services for a new on-site ISFSI pad and supporting facilities (e.g., security building, haul path).

x Perform fuel inspections and spent fuel pool waste characterizations.

x Provide spent fuel canisters and vertical ventilated underground dry storage modules to store SONGS spent fuel assemblies.

x Load and transport the canisters to the ISFSI and place the canisters into the dry storage modules.

x Transport the loaded GTCC waste (reactor internals and certain other non-fuel waste material) canisters to the ISFSI.31 x

Engineering analyses, documentation, licensing and permitting activities.

SCE also maintains an ISFSI oversight team to ensure safe and efficient execution of the work by Holtec. The estimate for ISFSI and Fuel Transfer Operations also includes these SCE project oversight costs.

30 Includes plant modifications to systems that are not required to support spent fuel pool cooling or to meet other license conditions and places SONGS in a Cold and Dark condition in preparation of dismantlement and decontamination.

31 The Holtec contract milestone payment for transferring the GTCC waste to the ISFSI, as well as costs associated with the procurement of GTCC canisters is included in a separate line item in the DCE for GTCC Waste Storage within Other Projects.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 21 TABLE 5 ISFSI & FUEL TRANSFER OPERATIONS ESTIMATE

($ IN THOUSANDS) 3.

Decontamination, Dismantlement, Demolition, And Disposal In December 2016, following a competitive bidding process, SCE executed a contract with SDS to perform the major decontamination, dismantlement, demolition, and disposal work at SONGS. The SDS work will include removing all SONGS 2&3 structures, systems, and components to 3 feet below grade (i.e., to 27 feet elevation) to permit the release of the property for unrestricted future use.32 The SDS work will include characterizing, packaging, transporting, and disposing of waste from the SONGS site to appropriately licensed or permitted facilities.33 Additionally, SDS will support SCE to modify or amend its NRC Part 50 license for SONGS 2&3, as well as its existing agreements with the U.S. Navy and other permitting agencies as required for completion of this work scope.

The work is divided into two phases:

Phase I:

Transition and mobilization Phase II:

Decontamination, dismantlement, demolition, and waste disposal activities necessary to achieve partial site release and reduce the SONGS Part 50 license footprint to the ISFSI area only.

SDS will provide project management and field oversight, as well as planning and execution of D&D-related site management and support functions during the decommissioning of SONGS. SCE will perform oversight of SDSs activities, as required by the applicable licenses and permits, and will retain responsibility for license-related operations and security (i.e., spent fuel pool, fuel transfer, and ISFSI operations).

32 SDSs work scope excludes the ISFSI and switchyard facilities.

33 GTCC waste and spent fuel will be stored on the ISFSI and are not expected to be transported to a disposal facility during SDSs performance of the work.

Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)

Estimate To Complete (2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)

1 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 2

ISFSI Expansion 60,485 74,100 134,585 128,026 3

Canister Fabrication 79,562 27,705 107,266 104,026 4

Spent Fuel Loading & Transfer to ISFSI 40,580 40,580 38,159 5

ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Total 140,047 142,385 282,432 270,210

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 22 Phase II D&D activities will include:

x Segmenting the SONGS 2&3 reactor vessels and internals, and loading them into storage containers.

x Removing and disposing of large components including SONGS 2&3 reactor pressure vessels, steam generators, pressurizers, and turbine-generators.

x Decontaminating and removing all structures, systems, and components as necessary to achieve partial site release and reduce the Part 50 license to the ISFSI area only.

x Removing certain above-seabed components of the ocean conduits.

x Necessary backfill work to achieve level grade for the power block area at an elevation of +30.0 feet.34 x

Development of the partial site release plan in accordance with 10 C.F.R. § 20.1402 site release criteria. SDS will perform necessary D&D work to meet a radiological release criteria that does not exceed 15 millirem per year.35 The work scope under DGC contract does not include removing the intake/discharge structure beneath the seawall; ocean conduits; seawall and pedestrian walkway; gunite slope protection; and certain railroad track and site access roads.

Support for SCE-Retained Responsibilities SCE will remain the licensed operator for NRC licenses associated with SONGS and will retain responsibility for interfacing and corresponding with the regulatory agencies in the management of licenses.36 SCE will also continue to be the primary interface with the Navy (property owner), and the regulatory agencies and other government authorities responsible for existing permits and the issuance of new permits necessary to perform decommissioning. SDS will support SCE interface with the regulatory agencies and the Navy.37 34 Backfill material is excluded from the fixed price portion of SDSs contract scope.

35 Per 10 C.F.R § 20.1402, the NRC site release criteria is 25 mrem per year calculated as the peak annual Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) dose expected within the first 1,000 years after decommissioning. Release criteria is defined as residual radioactivity that is distinguishable from background radiation which results in a TEDE to an average member of the critical group, including that from groundwater sources of drinking water, and has been reduced to levels that are as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).

36 Nuclear operations are defined as operations and administration of installed, in-service structures, systems, and components within the Protected Area (PA).

37 SCE will retain responsibility for personnel screening for access and badging to the SONGS protected areas (PAs) and vital areas (VAs) until all spent fuel is removed from the spent fuel pools and placed into storage on the ISFSI and the associated security plans are revised and approved. When the PAs/VAs are reduced to the ISFSI only, SCE will transition this responsibility to SDS for all areas except the ISFSI. SCE will retain responsibility for the

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 23 4.

Substructure Removal The substructure removal work will include the activities necessary to achieve the final end state requirements determined by the Navy (which are incremental to the NRC partial site release requirements that will be met during SDSs major D&D work). SCE currently plans to select a contractor to perform the substructure removal work in the mid-2040s.

For purposes of preparing the 2017 DCE, Kenrich retained High Bridge Associates to review and update the 2014 DCE estimate for the removal of substructures below 3 feet below grade.

More specifically, substructure removal activities will include the following:

x Removing substructure systems and components required to achieve end state requirements set forth in the applicable Navy real estate authorization for the SONGS Site. This work will include cleanup, remediation, and/or removal of structures, systems, and components, soils/debris, and/or contaminated groundwater, as required.38 x

Backfilling excavations and voids with approved material and leveling the SONGS site, as required by regulatory and landowner closure requirements.

x Characterizing, packaging, transporting, processing, and disposing of SONGS waste as required to support the regulatory and landowner closure requirements.

x Removing the existing seawall and intake and outfall box culvert.

Excluded from the substructure removal work are the demolition and removal of the ISFSI after the spent nuclear fuel and GTCC waste is removed by the DOE. Also excluded is the other final site restoration work to meet requirements related to the final termination of the SONGS site easements (e.g., ocean conduits, gunite slopes, drainage requirements, access roads, etc.).

The estimated substructure removal costs are summarized in the table below.

industrial and commercial security requirements at SONGS until the security plans are revised and the NRC approves the reduction of the PA/VAs to the area associated with the on-site ISFSI. SDS will take over this responsibility following the transfer of all spent fuel and GTCC to the ISFSI and the implementation of the associated revised security plans.

38 The activities may also include removal of certain above grade facilities remaining after the major D&D work performed by SDS, potentially including non-essential utilities, parking areas, roads, and other improvements.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 24 TABLE 6 SUBSTRUCTURE REMOVAL ESTIMATE

($ IN THOUSANDS) 5.

Offshore Conduit Removal As was the case for the 2014 DCE, uncertainty remains regarding the requirements for removal of the offshore intake and outfall conduits located below the sea floor. For SONGS 1, the CSLC has allowed the SONGS 1 conduits to remain in place provided that the SONGS 1 Participants retain the liability to remove the SONGS 1 conduits should that be deemed by the CSLC to be necessary at a future date. For these reasons, the 2017 DCE continues to include an estimated cost to perform the full removal of the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits as was estimated in the 2014 DCE. The 2017 DCE includes $96.0 million to fully remove the SONGS 2&3 offshore conduits.

6.

ISFSI Demolition Following the removal of all spent fuel and GTCC waste by the DOE, SCE will demolish and remove the ISFSI and perform activities necessary for the final restoration of the SONGS site. At the time the 2014 DCE was prepared, the specific plans to expand the ISFSI had not been defined. Later in 2014, SCE entered into a contract with Holtec to expand the ISFSI.

Kenrich retained High Bridge Associates to update the ISFSI demolition estimate in the 2014 DCE to reflect the Holtec ISFSI pad. The updated estimate for ISFSI demolition is $20.2 million.

7.

Final Site Restoration The final restoration work includes the removal of the gunite slope protection; remaining railroad tracks, rails, and ballast; access roads and parking lots. In addition, this work includes any other work required by the Navy real estate authorization, which is expected to include the final grading and re-vegetation of the SONGS site. The total estimated final site restoration work in the 2017 DCE is $7.3 million. The 2014 DCE included, as part of final site restoration, the costs to remove the intake and outfall structure underneath the seawall, which required installing and removing dewatering equipment and a temporary seawall. The intake and outfall structure beneath the seawall, as well as the seawall itself, are now expected to be removed Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)

Estimate To Complete (2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)

1 Substructure Removal 2

Excavation and Dewatering 152,819 152,819 145,563 3

Demolition and Backfill 108,277 108,277 102,573 4

Other 8,833 8,833 8,386 5

Removal of Seawall and Box Culvert 17,410 17,410 16,520 6

Substructure Removal 287,340 287,340 273,042

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 25 during the civil works project (i.e., Period 6, 2046-2049). Therefore, the second dewatering process and temporary seawall are no longer necessary during final site restoration.

8.

Other Distributed Projects In addition to the major decommissioning projects discussed above, SCE must also perform other projects to comply with federal and state regulations and the terms of SCEs real estate authorizations with the Navy. These other projects and their associated estimated costs are shown in Table 7 and discussed in more detail below.

TABLE 7 OTHER DISTRIBUTED PROJECTS ESTIMATE

($ IN THOUSANDS) a.

ISFSI Aging Management The Aging Management project was established to develop inspection and maintenance programs for the Areva and Holtec spent fuel dry storage systems. Also included are initial cask testing, inspection equipment and licensing costs for dry cask NRC Certificate of Compliance (CoC) renewals, and Safety Analysis Report (SAR) updates. Ongoing required annual maintenance and inspections of the spent fuel dry storage systems are included in the undistributed non-labor Aging Management category.

b. Coastal Development Permit Extensions SCE holds a Coastal Development Permit for the storage of SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Areva ISFSI system until November 2022, and a separate CDP to store SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in the Holtec ISFSI system until 2035. Therefore, SCE will need to obtain CDP extensions Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)

Estimate To Complete (2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)

1 Other Projects 2

ISFSI Aging Management 385 38,376 38,761 36,489 3

Coastal Development Permit Extensions 5,580 5,580 5,252 4

GTCC Waste Storage 28,270 28,270 26,632 5

Mesa Site Turnover 7,245 13,967 21,212 20,341 6

CEQA Permitting 3,169 5,162 8,331 7,914 7

Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal And Plant Easements 646 14,658 15,305 14,427 8

Plant Lease Extension 4,118 4,118 3,878 9

Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration 9,290 9,290 8,745 10 Cyber Security Modifications 8,513 1,131 9,644 9,380 11 DCE Update 3,897 3,897 3,669 12 GTCC Disposal 43,200 43,200 40,662 13 ISFSI CDP Settlement 4,543 4,543 4,277 14 Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 7,447 7,447 7,011 15 NIA Sump Modifications 1,150 1,150 1,081 16 Other Projects Total 19,959 180,789 200,748 189,758

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 26 from the CCC for the Areva and Holtec ISFSI systems prior to the expiration of the permits in 2022 and 2035, respectively.

c.

GTCC Waste Storage As part of the DGC contract, SDS is responsible for preparing, characterizing, and packaging the GTCC waste into canisters, with the exception of the relatively small amount of GTCC waste which currently resides in the spent fuel pools and will be loaded by Holtec.

Holtec will supply the GTCC canisters and is also responsible for transferring the loaded GTCC waste canisters to the ISFSI pad. The estimated costs cover the purchase and licensing of GTCC canisters, as well as their transfer from the containment buildings to the ISFSI pad.

d. Mesa Site Turnover SCEs Mesa site consists of five parcels leased from the Navy. Parcel 5 is on the west side of U.S. Interstate Highway 5 (I-5) and includes a security station to control access to Parcels 6 and 7. Parcels 6 and 7 are located on the east side of I-5 and comprise the largest portion of the Mesa site. Parcels 8 and 9 include a parking lot and lay-down area on the west side of I-5.

SCE currently estimates that Parcels 5, 6, and 7 will be returned to the Navy in 2021, and Parcels 8 & 9 will be retained until the end of decommissioning. As part of the process to return the parcels to the Navy, SCE must first remediate any contamination and obtain No Further Action Letters from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) indicating the property is available for unrestricted use.39 The estimated cost associated with the project is based on currently anticipated remediation requirements.

e.

CEQA Permitting (California State Lands Commission)

Under CEQA, the CSLC, as lead agency, is required to evaluate the SONGS decommissioning project and prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in response to SCEs application to modify and extend the existing CSLC lease regarding the offshore conduits.

The CEQA permitting process began in 2015. The CSLC is expected to issue a draft EIR in the second quarter of 2018 and issue its Final EIR in the third quarter of 2018. The California Coastal Commission is then expected to review an application for a CDP based on the EIR, as well as its own additional analysis. The CCC is expected to approve the CDP in the fourth quarter of 2018. Following the receipt of the CDP, the physical decommissioning of the plant can proceed.

39 On April 24, 2017, the DTSC issued a No Further Action Letter for Parcel 5. The efforts to assess and remediate contamination for Parcels 6 and 7 are ongoing. SCE continues to hold Parcel 5 as it provides access to Parcels 6 and 7.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 27 f.

Real Estate Authorization Renewals and Plant Lease Amendments The current SONGS Plant Easement with the Navy expires in 2024. SCE will therefore seek an extension (new real estate authorization) covering the time to complete major decommissioning activities. As a federal agency, the Navy must undertake a NEPA environmental review prior to issuing a new real estate authorization. The initial NEPA process is expected to be completed in 2024 and will allow SCE to continue using the property until 2035.

In 2030, SCE will begin the process to further extend the lease from 2035 until such time the property is projected to be to be turned over to the Navy. In 2040, the Navy is expected to undertake another NEPA review to determine the final site restoration conditions, including the substructure removal requirements. These end-state requirements should be determined by 2045, prior to beginning the civil works project in 2046.

g.

Cyber Security Modifications NRC regulations require a Cyber Security Plan at SONGS to ensure certain digital assets, such as computer and communication systems and networks, are secure and protected. SCE has implemented 7 of 8 Cyber Security Plan milestones. At the end of 2017 the NRC granted approval for a license amendment to remove the cyber security license condition, thus waiving the requirement to implement Milestone 8.

h. DCE Update As part of the NDCTP, SCE is required to submit an updated DCE for approval by the CPUC.

i.

GTCC Disposal Presently, a disposal facility licensed to accept GTCC waste does not exist in the United States. Courts have determined that the DOE is obligated to accept and dispose of GTCC waste; however, issues regarding costs remain unsettled. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, the cost of shipping and disposing of a GTCC canister was assumed to equal the cost associated with a canister of SONGS spent fuel. The one-mill fee per kilowatt-hour of generation under the Standard Contract was used to estimate this cost.

j.

ISFSI CDP Settlement In August 2017, SCE reached a settlement agreement with parties opposed to the storage of spent fuel at SONGS. As part of that settlement, SCE agreed to incur up to $4 million on commercially reasonable efforts to identify an alternative location for SONGS spent fuel storage.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 28 SCE also incurred third-party legal costs to reach the settlement. Given the ongoing analysis and current uncertainty relating to the potential location and requirements of an acceptable alternative spent fuel storage site, the associated costs with moving to an alternative site have not been included in this DCE.

k. Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement In 2044, SCE will begin efforts to procure a contractor for the removal of SONGS substructures and placement of permanent backfill. The 2017 DCE therefore includes costs to cover a competitive bidding process, including the development of a Request for Proposal, proposal evaluation, and contract award. For purposes of this DCE, the effort was assumed to be approximately one-half the expended cost to procure a DGC for the major D&D work.

l.

NIA Sump Modifications The NIA sump currently discharges to the SONGS 2&3 dilution water system. The dilution water system will be retired by SDS, and therefore the discharge pathway for the NIA sump will need to be modified. Kenrich utilized the current budget estimate provided by the cognizant SCE Project Manager.

E.

Undistributed Costs Undistributed costs represent activities or fees, necessary to oversee, manage and support the overall decommissioning project. Undistributed costs are sometimes referred to as collateral, indirect, or level of effort costs. By their nature, such costs are not assignable to specific activities representing the physical work performed to decommission a nuclear plant.

Undistributed activities and cost items are characterized by a uniform rate of activity over a specific period of time. Accordingly, undistributed costs were estimated for each decommissioning period. Within each period, the undistributed costs are incurred at a fixed rate and are thus largely time-dependent.

The table below summarizes the undistributed costs incurred through 2016 and future costs estimated for each decommissioning period. The costs are also segregated between labor and non-labor. The labor items include staff to provide oversight, management and other support. Non-labor items include costs associated with services performed by third-parties, as well as rents, fees, and other costs necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory and other requirements.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 29 TABLE 8 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)

Description Period 1 Initial Activities (Nominal $)

Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2017$)

Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2017$)

Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2017$)

Period 5 Dry Storage (2017$)

Period 6 Civil Works Project (2017$)

Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration (2017$)

Total (Nominal/

2017$)

1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4

Undistributed Activities 5

Labor-Staffing 6

Site Management & Administration 19,393 3,379 71,195 16,666 13,265 1,901 7

Plant Management 46,774 8,140 46,085 85,274 20,799 2,340 8

Decommissioning Oversight 14,417 4,916 136,266 13,417 27,121 8,919 9

Utility Staff Subtotal 245,555 80,583 16,436 253,546 115,356 61,185 13,159 785,820 10 Security Force 91,073 45,231 6,518 31,254 57,448 14,012 1,576 247,112 11 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 336,628 125,814 22,954 284,800 172,804 75,196 14,735 1,032,932 12 13 Non-Labor 14 Aging Management 48 4,209 10,018 1,955 16,230 15 Association Fees and Expenses 817 1,332 251 3,910 1,958 478 215 8,961 16 Community Engagement Panel 2,304 1,640 279 5,482 2,405 566 283 12,958 17 Contracted Services 67,641 33,556 3,957 59,073 50,430 16,086 4,349 235,092 18 DAW Disposal 32 32 19 Decommissioning Advisor 2,515 1,231 278 6,392 10,416 20 DGC Executive Oversight Committee 508 144 3,306 3,958 21 Emergency Preparedness Fees 9,099 3,792 864 15,081 16,998 4,146 49,980 22 Energy 16,964 7,571 2,241 45,194 10,983 4,117 526 87,596 23 Environmental Permits and Fees 3,081 662 14 328 1,064 1,154 576 6,879 24 Ground Water Monitoring 391 92 46 529 25 Information Technology 12,886 5,248 479 7,494 2,486 3,033 1,365 32,991 26 Insurance 13,824 4,778 977 15,947 22,029 5,688 2,479 65,722 27 Third Party Legal 4,336 2,579 479 7,571 7,648 2,300 230 25,142 28 NRC Fees 4,566 2,836 248 9,169 10,369 2,455 2,646 32,291 29 Office Space 1,173 391 92 92 1,748 30 Security Related Expenses 1,552 1,209 422 1,017 5,461 2,192 526 12,378 31 Severance 89,594 9,135 6,001 9,782 2,367 6,165 123,044 32 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 8,049 5,710 1,039 21,040 47,825 11,552 5,930 101,145 33 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 17,940 14,628 32,568 34 Tools and Equipment 49 49 35 Water 1,663 1,224 184 4,243 7,261 1,771 797 17,143 36 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 2,163 979 9

198 352 83 41 3,825 37 Non-Labor Subtotal 241,104 84,020 17,913 220,608 218,376 72,388 26,266 880,676 38 39 Service Level Agreements 10,647 27,510 4,518 83,094 20,521 22,210 9,143 177,643 40 DGC Staffing 41 Undistributed Activities Subtotal 42 43 Distributed Projects 44 45 Total 4,702,264

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 30 TABLE 9 UNDISTRIBUTED COST ESTIMATE (2014$ IN THOUSANDS) 1.

Decommissioning Staffing Since January 2017, SCE and SDS have been working closely to manage and implement the transition of numerous management programs and functions from SCE to SDS. Following this transition, SCE will maintain an oversight role with respect to SDSs contract. SCE will continue to be responsible for the ISFSI project, for ongoing nuclear operations, security, and other distributed projects (e.g., ISFSI Aging Management, Mesa Turnover). Following the completion of the SDS D&D contract, SCE will take back over the performance of the on-site programs and functions that had been transitioned to SDS.

Description Period 1 Initial Activities (2014$)

Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2014$)

Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2014$)

Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2014$)

Period 5 Dry Storage (2014$)

Period 6 Civil Works Project (2014$)

Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration (2014$)

Total (2014$)

1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4

Undistributed Activities 5

Labor-Staffing 6

Site Management & Administration 18,179 3,175 66,883 15,656 12,462 1,785 7

Plant Management 43,882 7,647 43,293 80,109 19,539 2,198 8

Decommissioning Oversight 13,537 4,618 128,012 12,604 25,478 8,378 9

Utility Staff Subtotal 242,544 75,598 15,440 238,189 108,369 57,478 12,362 749,981 10 Security Force 89,640 42,456 6,123 29,360 53,968 13,163 1,481 236,192 11 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 332,184 118,054 21,564 267,549 162,337 70,641 13,843 986,172 12 13 Non-Labor 14 Aging Management 45 3,958 9,421 1,838 15,262 15 Association Fees and Expenses 800 1,277 237 3,701 1,882 459 207 8,564 16 Community Engagement Panel 2,267 1,556 267 5,268 2,311 544 272 12,486 17 Contracted Services 66,942 31,650 3,736 55,800 47,718 15,215 4,102 225,164 18 DAW Disposal 30 30 19 Decommissioning Advisor 2,470 1,156 261 6,011 9,899 20 DGC Executive Oversight Committee 477 135 3,109 3,722 21 Emergency Preparedness Fees 9,047 3,645 830 14,496 16,339 3,985 48,341 22 Energy 16,840 7,277 2,154 43,440 10,557 3,957 506 84,732 23 Environmental Permits and Fees 3,065 636 14 312 1,007 1,108 553 6,695 24 Ground Water Monitoring 368 87 43 497 25 Information Technology 12,845 4,945 454 7,117 2,361 2,881 1,296 31,900 26 Insurance 13,779 4,592 939 15,328 21,175 5,467 2,383 63,663 27 Third Party Legal 4,234 2,425 451 7,119 7,192 2,163 216 23,799 28 NRC Fees 4,539 2,725 239 8,813 9,967 2,360 2,544 31,187 29 Office Space 1,104 376 88 87 1,655 30 Security Related Expenses 1,536 1,150 403 973 5,166 2,069 496 11,792 31 Severance 89,524 8,599 5,657 9,222 2,232 5,812 121,047 32 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 7,996 5,488 999 20,223 45,970 11,104 5,700 97,481 33 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 16,870 13,756 30,626 34 Tools and Equipment 49 49 35 Water 1,654 1,176 177 4,078 6,979 1,702 766 16,534 36 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 2,103 918 8

187 331 78 39 3,663 37 Non-Labor Subtotal 239,691 79,724 17,005 210,259 208,221 68,862 25,023 848,786 38 39 Service Level Agreements 10,278 26,121 4,288 78,793 19,278 20,865 8,589 168,212 40 DGC Staffing 41 Undistributed Activities Subtotal 42 43 Distributed Projects 44 45 Total 4,478,566

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 31 With contracts now in place for the majority of the SONGS decommissioning work, SCE was able to carefully evaluate its own staffing needs. As part of the process to develop the staffing projections, each SONGS division was grouped into the following categories.

Site Management & Administration - Responsible for oversight and strategic planning, ensuring compliance with regulatory and permitting requirements, safety, security, and overall project cost and schedule.

Plant Management - Responsible for the operations, maintenance, and security of the plant facilities. Staffing levels are expected to decrease significantly after the nuclear fuel is transferred from the spent fuel pool to the ISFSI pad.

Project Oversight - Responsible for oversight of the SDS D&D contract, management of the ISFSI, and other distributed projects. The oversight role ensures all work is completed safely and in compliance with the contract, government regulations, and permits. The staffing levels will vary over the duration of the project based on the amount of physical work being performed (e.g., the number of radiological oversight personnel will decrease after D&D is complete).

As part of the process to estimate staffing needs, senior management met with SONGS division managers to identify major activities during each phase of the decommissioning project.

The estimated staffing for each period was based on a bottom up assessment of each needed discipline and position. Kenrich also worked with SCE management to vet the underlying assumptions and confirm the rationale underlying the projections. This effort involved numerous interviews of SONGS division managers, an analysis of the plan to transition management and supervision responsibilities from SCE to SDS, and a reconciliation to the staffing levels in the 2014 DCE.40 Staffing levels at other utilities having nuclear decommissioning experience were reviewed and considered, while also taking into account site-specific requirements and characteristics of SONGS. To further ensure the reasonableness of the SONGS staffing projections, SCE retained ABZ, an industry expert in decommissioning cost estimating. SCE specifically requested ABZ to provide input based on their experiences working with other nuclear utilities and to confirm that the SONGS projections were in line with industry norms.

The table below summarizes the staffing projection by period. The average staffing levels estimated for each period are intended to account for anticipated adjustments within each decommissioning period.

40 The 2014 DCE did not assume the transition of programs to the DGC, therefore the headcount for certain divisions, such as maintenance and radiological control and chemistry, decreased in the 2017 DCE, but the decommissioning oversight positions increased in the 2017 DCE.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 32 TABLE 10 UTILITY & SECURITY FORCE AVERAGE STAFFING BY PERIOD41 The costs associated with the projected staffing is based on average labor rates for each position. The staffing cost estimate includes labor burdens and short-term incentive compensation, and accounts for positions being filled by contractors.

The table below summarizes the labor-staffing costs by each project period.

41 Excludes DGC staffing and third-party contractors at SONGS.

Description Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage Period 5 Dry Storage Period 6 Civil Works Project Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration 1

Start 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4

5 Site Management & Administration 6

Site Management & Administration 16 11 10 1

3 7

Decommissioning Finance 5

8 8

1 4

1 8

Regulatory Affairs & Nuclear Oversight 10 8

8 2

4 4

9 Total Site Management & Administration 30 27 26 4

11 5

10 11 Plant Management 12 Plant Management 1

1 1

1 1

13 Operations 40 36 14 Radiological Control & Chemistry 13 15 Maintenance, Work Control, & PI/CAP 18 7

7 7

7 3

16 Engineering 15 7

7 7

7 3

17 EP Planning 3

3 2

2 2

1 18 Security 155 158 34 34 34 14 19 Total Plant Management 244 212 51 51 51 20 20 21 Decommissioning Oversight 23 38 45 22 16 22 23 Total 296 277 122 55 84 41

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 33 TABLE 11 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (NOMINAL/2017$ IN THOUSANDS)

TABLE 12 UNDISTRIBUTED LABOR COST ESTIMATE (2014$ IN THOUSANDS) 2.

Undistributed Non-Labor Costs In addition to staffing, SCE incurs non-labor costs to support the decommissioning efforts. As part of the process to identify and estimate future non-labor costs, historical recorded costs were reviewed in detail. Kenrich worked with knowledgeable SONGS personnel to develop and estimate future decommissioning costs which are summarized in Table 13 and broken down below.

Description Period 1 Initial Activities (Nominal)

Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2017$)

Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2017$)

Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2017$)

Period 5 Dry Storage (2017$)

Period 6 Civil Works Project (2017$)

Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration (2017$)

Total (Nominal/

2017$)

1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4

Utility Staff 5

Site Management & Administration 19,393 3,379 71,195 16,666 13,265 1,901 6

Plant Management 46,774 8,140 46,085 85,274 20,799 2,340 7

Decommissioning Oversight 14,417 4,916 136,266 13,417 27,121 8,919 8

Utility Staff Subtotal 245,555 80,583 16,436 253,546 115,356 61,185 13,159 785,820 9

Security Force 91,073 45,231 6,518 31,254 57,448 14,012 1,576 247,112 10 Labor-Staffing Total 336,628 125,814 22,954 284,800 172,804 75,196 14,735 1,032,932 Description Period 1 Initial Activities (2014$)

Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (2014$)

Period 3 D&D and Pool Storage (2014$)

Period 4 D&D and Dry Storage (2014$)

Period 5 Dry Storage (2014$)

Period 6 Civil Works Project (2014$)

Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration (2014$)

Total (2014$)

1 Start 6/7/2013 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 6/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2016 12/31/2018 5/31/2019 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 3 6 2 0 0 4 9 6 17 0 4 0 2 0 4

Utility Staff 5

Site Management & Administration 18,179 3,175 66,883 15,656 12,462 1,785 6

Plant Management 43,882 7,647 43,293 80,109 19,539 2,198 7

Decommissioning Oversight 13,537 4,618 128,012 12,604 25,478 8,378 8

Utility Staff Subtotal 242,544 75,598 15,440 238,189 108,369 57,478 12,362 749,981 9

Security Force 89,640 42,456 6,123 29,360 53,968 13,163 1,481 236,192 10 Labor-Staffing Total 332,184 118,054 21,564 267,549 162,337 70,641 13,843 986,172

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 34 TABLE 13 UNDISTRIBUTED NON-LABOR COST ESTIMATE

($ IN THOUSANDS) a.

Aging Management Aging Management programs cover both the Areva and Holtec dry storage systems. In addition to the scope covered by the distributed Aging Management project, the programs include annual facility maintenance and inspection as well as in-service canister inspections every five years, in compliance with the respective Areva and Holtec SARs.

The Areva Aging Management undistributed costs begin in 2022, after the NRC Certificate of Compliance is renewed. These costs continue until the DOE is assumed to accept the final Areva canister from SONGS in 2037. The Holtec Aging Management costs begin in 2019 after all of the fuel has been transferred from the SONGS 2&3 spent pools to the ISFSI, and then continue until the DOE is assumed to accept the final Holtec canister in 2049.

b. Association Fees and Other Expenses Association Fees and Other Expenses include Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) membership fees, costs related to an external Nuclear Oversight Board (NOB), and an outside Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)

Estimate To Complete (2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)

1 Non-Labor 2

Aging Management 16,230 16,230 15,262 3

Association Fees and Expenses 817 8,144 8,961 8,564 4

Community Engagement Panel 2,304 10,653 12,958 12,486 5

Contracted Services 67,641 167,451 235,092 225,164 6

DAW Disposal 32 32 30 7

Decommissioning Advisor 2,515 7,901 10,416 9,899 8

DGC Executive Oversight Committee 3,958 3,958 3,722 9

Emergency Preparedness Fees 9,099 40,881 49,980 48,341 10 Energy 16,964 70,631 87,596 84,732 11 Environmental Permits and Fees 3,081 3,798 6,879 6,695 12 Ground Water Monitoring 529 529 497 13 Information Technology 12,886 20,105 32,991 31,900 14 Insurance 13,824 51,898 65,722 63,663 15 Third Party Legal 4,336 20,807 25,142 23,799 16 NRC Fees 4,566 27,724 32,291 31,187 17 Office Space 1,748 1,748 1,655 18 Security Related Expenses 1,552 10,826 12,378 11,792 19 Severance 89,594 33,450 123,044 121,047 20 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 8,049 93,096 101,145 97,481 21 Tools and Equipment 49 49 49 22 Water 1,663 15,480 17,143 16,534 23 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 2,163 1,662 3,825 3,663 24 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 32,568 32,568 30,626 25 Non-Labor Total 241,104 639,572 880,676 848,786

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 35 advisor to SCEs Internal Nuclear Management Group (INMG). SCE remains an NEI member to obtain access to industry policies, standards, and guidance regarding decommissioning. The NOB is composed of independent review specialists who provide independent review of decommissioning activities.

NEI Fees are estimated to be incurred through Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition & Final Site Restoration); NOB costs are expected through Period 4 (major D&D); and SCE anticipates retaining an outside advisor to the INMG until 2022.

c.

Community Engagement Panel The SONGS Community Engagement Panel (CEP) holds periodic meetings with the public to provide information on various issues, including decommissioning plans, spent fuel management, emergency planning, security, and the environmental review process. CEP costs are estimated to be incurred through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition & Final Site Restoration). The annual estimate is based on the 2018 budgeted amounts per CEP meeting, and is adjusted proportionately based on the number of meetings estimated each year. Six CEP meetings are assumed in 2018, four CEP meetings per year are estimated during major D&D, through 2028, and one meeting per year is assumed after major D&D is complete.

d. Contracted Services Contracted Services generally consist of shorter-term supplemental resources, specialty contractors and consultants, third-party services, materials, equipment, and supplies. SONGS senior management, division managers, and Kenrich worked together to identify and estimate the projected costs. Contracted Services costs were estimated for each decommissioning period in each of the following divisions: (1) Decommissioning Projects / Decommissioning Oversight; (2) Engineering; (3) Emergency Preparedness; (4) Maintenance; (5) Nuclear Oversight, Safety, Regulatory Affairs; (6) Operations; (7) Decommissioning Finance; and (8) Site Management &

Administration.

Similar to the undistributed staffing, the projected needs for Contracted Services are reduced after major decommissioning milestones are achieved. For example:

x Transition of SONGS Programs to SDS - SDS will assume responsibility for the management of numerous SONGS programs by the end of 2017.

Accordingly, the estimated costs for contracted services in the Maintenance and Decommissioning Projects divisions are significantly lower in 2018.

x Completion of Fuel Transfer Operations - After all spent fuel has been transferred to the ISFSI, the Operations division and its associated contracted services will no longer be needed.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 36 x

D&D Complete - Many of the contracted services costs in the Decommissioning Oversight and Site Management & Administration divisions will not be needed after SDS completes its work and the SONGS programs are reduced.

e.

Decommissioning Advisor The Decommissioning Advisor provides subject matter expertise and assistance on various matters, including regulatory issues, spent fuel storage, and project management.

Decommissioning Advisor costs are estimated through Period 4 (D&D).

f.

DGC Executive Oversight Committee The SDS D&D contract requires an Executive Oversight Committee composed of five individuals charged with resolving contractual issues. The committee includes one person each from SCE and SDS, and three independent third-party members. SCE and SDS share the costs of the third-party positions.

g.

Emergency Preparedness Fees SCE provides funding to local jurisdictions for the management of radiological emergency preparedness, including planning, response, and recovery activities. Currently, SCE pays fees in accordance with a December 2015 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) covering a period through 2020. The Emergency Preparedness fees are assumed to be paid annually until all spent fuel has been removed from SONGS.

h. Energy SCE must purchase energy from the grid to power the site, including loads required for decommissioning work. The energy costs are based on historical retail electricity rates and on projected usage. The projected usage was prepared by SCE Engineering and reflects the major activities in each decommissioning period.

i.

Environmental Permits And Fees SONGS must comply with a variety of environmental regulations and maintain numerous permits, which involve the payment of fees. These permits and associated fees include: (1) the State Water Resource Control Board National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit fees and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) fees; (2) State of California Board of Equalization mixed waste fees; (3) fees for the California Department of Environmental Health Permit, which includes the permit for Underground Storage Tanks; (4) Air Pollution Control District Permit (APCD) fees; (5) Diesel Generator permit fees; (6) California Coastal

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 37 Commission fees; (7) Refrigerant Management Program; and (8) Kelp consortium costs for monitoring and surveying ocean kelp.

During the D&D period, SDS will be responsible for certain permits and fees, including the NPDES permit, mixed waste fee, SWPPP fee, and APCD permit. However, SCE will continue to maintain other permits and incur other fees (e.g. Department of Environmental Health fees, Diesel Generator air permits, CCC fees, and Refrigerant Management Program fees) through this period.

j.

Ground Water Monitoring SCE is required to monitor the ground water beneath the site for the presence of tritium.

The costs include sampling, analysis, and monitoring performed by third-party contractors and will be required through the end of SONGS decommissioning. During the D&D period, SDS will assume responsibility for ground water monitoring.

k. Information Technology Information Technology (IT) costs include SONGS software and network licenses, internal technical support, and payments to network service providers. IT costs are expected to decrease after 2018 after one-time IT projects are completed, and ongoing support costs will be reduced after 2019.42 l.

Insurance NRC regulations require that SCE maintains a minimum level of nuclear liability and property insurance, including Nuclear Property Insurance (provided by Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited) and Nuclear Liability Insurance (provided by American Nuclear Insurers).43 SCE must maintain nuclear-related insurance coverage until the spent nuclear fuel is removed from the SONGS site.44 In addition, SCE also maintains General Liability Insurance and Excess Workers' Compensation Insurance, the cost of which is generally a function of SONGS headcount.

Historical costs were used as the primary basis to estimate future insurance costs.

42 Separately, SONGS also incurs costs associated with support provided by SCE corporate IT personnel and resources. The costs for such additional IT support are provided via a Service Level Agreement with SCE.

43 Should the Participants choose to reduce current insurance coverage amounts, the future premiums would be reduced accordingly. In December 2017, the Participants received an exemption from the NRC allowing them to reduce insurance coverage.

44 Insurance requirements per NRC regulations 10 C.F.R § 50.54(w) and 10 C.F.R § 140.11.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 38

m. Third Party Legal SCE retains outside counsel as necessary to handle legal matters that require specific expertise, or when legal matters require additional resources. For example, SCE engaged outside counsel to support decommissioning licensing proceedings before the NRC, and environmental/land use permitting proceedings before the CCC, CSLC, and other government agencies.
n. NRC Fees The NRC charges two different types of fees to nuclear reactor licensees: (1) annual fees (Part 171 Fees), and (2) inspection fees (Part 170 Fees). The Part 171 Fees are fixed annual payments per licensee (i.e., an annual fee for each SONGS unit), including nuclear plants that have been permanently retired. The Part 171 fees are to cover generic (i.e., non-licensee specific) activities performed by the NRC. In contrast, the NRC charges licensees Part 170 Fees based on the time it spends on performance reviews, evaluations, incident investigations, and other activities that are specific to an individual licensee.

o.

Office Space Following the completion of major D&D, SCE will need to lease office space for the remaining employees as all the existing office space on the SONGS site will have been removed.

The costs to install trailers and annual lease payments are included in the estimate. During major D&D, SDS is responsible for providing SCEs office space.

p. Security Related Expenses Security Related Expenses include uniforms, weapons, ammunition, and other supplies and equipment to support the SONGS Security Force, as well as background investigations, training costs, and vendor support.
q. Severance Under the California Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning Act of 1985,45 SCE employees at SONGS who are severed as a result of the shutdown and permanent retirement of SONGS are eligible for severance benefits. These benefits include lump sum cash payments based on years of service, outplacement services, and reimbursement for educational expenses.

45 California Public Utilities Code § 8322(g).

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 39 r.

Site Lease And Easements SCE makes annual lease and easement payments to the Navy for the SONGS plant site and Mesa, and to the CSLC for the SONGS offshore conduits. The current site lease with the Navy ends in 2024. As previously discussed, SCE expects to negotiate a new lease to cover the period after 2024 through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration).

The rate per acre in the new plant site lease agreement is expected to increase to account for the fair market value of the property.

The Mesa lease payments to the Navy are expected to remain consistent with the current agreement until Mesa Parcels 5, 6, and 7 are returned to the Navy in 2021. The conduits lease payments to the CSLC are expected to remain consistent with the current agreement, which includes periodic increases in lease payments, through the end of Period 7 (ISFSI Demolition and Final Site Restoration).

s.

Water Utilities includes expenses for water provided by the South Coast Water District (SCWD)

Joint Regional Water Supply System (JRWSS). Costs were estimated based on historical recorded costs.

t.

Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Health Physics (also referred to as HP or Radiation Protection) supplies, including personal radiological monitoring and protection equipment, are used by personnel performing work in radiological areas of the plant. Beginning in 2018, SDS will assume responsibility for the radiation protection program. SCE will resume responsibility after the D&D work is performed. Minimal Health Physics supplies will be needed to support the ISFSI only staff as virtually all contaminated materials will have been removed from the site.

u. Loading Spent Fuel And GTCC Waste To DOE Under the Standard Contract with the DOE, SCE is responsible for transferring canisters from the ISFSI and loading them into DOE shipping containers on-site. The estimate assumes the DOE will accept the loaded canisters and that a dry fuel transfer facility is not necessary.

The DOE will take title to the waste after it is loaded onto the DOEs transport device and the carrier signs for the shipment at the plant site. For purposes of the 2017 DCE, DOE loading costs are assumed to equal approximately 50% of the costs to load and transfer the spent fuel to the ISFSI. The timing of the DOE loading costs is based on the assumed Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule (Appendix A).

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 40 3.

Service Level Agreements For Administrative & General Expenses The 2014 DCE included 5% on all estimated costs to account for SCEs administrative and general (A&G) expenses supporting the SONGS decommissioning project. Beginning in 2016, SCE started to develop Service Level Agreements (SLAs) between the SONGS Participants and the SCE departments that support SONGS decommissioning. The SLAs are intended to provide additional transparency with respect to types of costs and level of support needed. There are separate SLAs for each SCE department supporting SONGS (e.g., Human Resources, IT, Legal, CPUC Regulatory Affairs). Beginning in 2029, after Period 4 is completed, corporate support functions are estimated in the A&G line item in lieu of separate SLAs, and is calculated as 5% of all other 2029-2051 estimated costs. The table below summarizes the SLAs and their associated estimated costs.

TABLE 14 SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT (A&G) COST ESTIMATE

($ IN THOUSANDS) 4.

DGC Staffing Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)

Estimate To Complete 2017 - 2028 (2017$)

Estimate To Complete 2029 - 2051 (2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)

1 Service Level Agreements (A&G) 2 Audit Services 9,893 9,893 9,404 3

Controllers 12,193 12,193 11,587 4

Corporate Communications 228 1,933 2,161 2,043 5

Corporate Security 2,878 2,878 2,754 6

CPUC Regulatory Affairs 10,982 10,982 10,444 7

Decommissioning Finance 1,128 718 1,846 1,760 8

Environmental Policy 1,833 1,833 1,726 9

Environmental Services 107 2,243 2,349 2,211 10 Human Resources 8,005 8,005 7,588 11 Information Governance 1,092 1,092 1,033 12 Information Technology 7,037 24,820 31,857 30,461 13 Legal 10,883 10,883 10,226 14 Local Public Affairs 764 764 719 15 Real Properties 247 659 906 856 16 Risk Management 300 300 283 17 Short Term Incentive Plan (STIP) 6,050 6,050 5,684 18 Supply Management 1,375 9,341 10,716 10,147 19 Tax 1,874 1,874 1,787 20 Transportation Services 525 4,989 5,514 5,308 21 Treasurers 3,672 3,672 3,461 22 A&G (2029 - 2051) 51,874 51,874 48,732 23 Service Level Agreements (A&G) Total 10,647 115,122 51,874 177,643 168,212

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 41 F.

2017 DCE Costs By NRC Cost Category SONGS distributed projects are classified into one of the following three NRC cost categories: (1) License Termination (LT); (2) Spent Fuel Management (SNF); and (3) Site Restoration (SR). License Termination activities are those required to decontaminate the site and reduce residual radioactivity in order to terminate the NRC licenses pursuant to 10 C.F.R § 50.75(c). License termination activities are expected to be completed in 2028, following the SDS D&D work, and NRC approval of the partial site release.

Spent Fuel Management activities are those required to operate and maintain the on-site spent fuel storage facilities until such time the spent fuel is removed by the DOE, in accordance with 10 C.F.R § 50.54(bb). The decommissioning of the ISFSI after the spent fuel is transferred offsite (10 C.F.R § 72.30) is also classified as a Spent Fuel Management activity.

The remaining distributed costs are classified as Site Restoration costs, which are primarily driven by the terms of the easement and lease agreements with the Navy and CSLC.

Site Restoration distributed projects include non-radiological decommissioning activities, such as the removal of non-contaminated substructures below 3 feet below grade.

The classification of distributed projects in this DCE to NRC cost categories is generally consistent with how projects were classified in the 2014 DCE.

Undistributed costs are also assigned to NRC cost categories. Certain undistributed cost items are assignable to a single NRC cost category (e.g., 100% of the annual cost to load spent fuel to the DOE is classified as Spent Fuel Management). However, given their nature, there are many other undistributed cost items which support multiple decommissioning activities (e.g.,

energy costs). These undistributed costs are allocated to License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration based on the distributed cost amounts in each NRC cost category.46 The table below summarizes the 2017 DCE costs by NRC cost category.

46 The undistributed costs incurred to date were recorded to each NRC cost category based on the allocation percentages assumed in the 2014 DCE.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 42 TABLE 15 2017 DCE BY NRC COST CATEGORY

($ IN THOUSANDS)

G.

Contingency Contingency is used in cost estimates to account for the costs of unplanned events and circumstances that often occur during the performance of a project. As defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers Project and Cost Engineers Handbook, contingency is an amount added to an estimate to allow for items, conditions, or events for which the state, occurrence, or effect is uncertain and that experience shows will likely result, in aggregate, in additional costs.

Examples of costs intended to be covered by contingency include planning and estimating errors and omissions, design development and changes within scope, minor price fluctuations, and variations in the market and environmental conditions. Contingency is not intended to cover all unknowns or unplanned occurrences. For example, contingency usually excludes major scope changes, extraordinary events such as strikes and natural disasters, specified management reserves for defined issues, and general price escalation or currency effects.

The consensus in industry literature is that a primary consideration in determining appropriate amounts for contingency on a particular project is the stage of development and level of confidence in the estimated known base project costs. The 2014 DCE used a 25%

Description Recorded Through 2016 (Nominal $)

Estimate To Complete (2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (Nominal /2017$)

Total Estimate At Completion (2014$)

1 License Termination 2

Distributed 3

Undistributed 4

License Termination Subtotal 1,906,728 5

6 Spent Fuel Management 7

Distributed 8

Undistributed 9

Spent Fuel Management Subtotal 1,367,361 10 11 Site Restoration 12 Distributed 13 Undistributed 14 Site Restoration Subtotal 166,324 1,098,532 1,264,856 1,204,476 15 16 Total 4,478,566

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 43 contingency factor,47 which was deemed reasonable by the CPUC in D.16-04-019 given the then-existing level of uncertainty in the then-current DCE.48 Given the current stage of decommissioning, a lower contingency factor is warranted in some areas. Kenrich and knowledgeable SCE personnel reviewed each major category of costs and determined an individual contingency factor for each group. In determining the contingency factors for each cost grouping, consideration was given to contracting status (e.g., ISFSI and D&D work are under contract), technical complexity, estimating approach, and other variables.

The remaining work associated with ISFSI is primarily the loading and transfer of spent fuel canisters to the ISFSI. The associated contingency factor reflects that this work is under contract and benefits from significant learning and industry experience over many decades. The D&D work is also under contract, following a rigorous competitive procurement process.

However, the contingency factor for this work also accounts for the significant influence of site-specific factors on D&D work. For other distributed work, not currently under contract and planned to occur in the relative distant future, the same 25% contingency factor used in the 2014 DCE was used in this DCE. With regard to undistributed labor and non-labor costs, the associated contingency factors account for a significantly more rigorous process used to develop the estimates contained in this DCE. In contrast to the 2014 DCE, the estimated headcount and non-labor costs for each division were subject to more substantial and iterative internal review and updating processes.

The table below summarizes the contingency factor applied to the to-go costs for each estimate.

47 Contingency of 25% was applied to all costs in the 2014 DCE with the following exceptions: 2013 and 2014 Actual Expenditures 0%; Department of Navy Easement Payments 15%; Hazardous and Asbestos Wastes 50%; Site Characterization Surveys 15%; Temporary Facilities 15%; Backfill and Compaction 15%.

48 Specifically referring to SONGS in its 2012 NDCTP decision, the CPUC stated, [t]he Commission finds the reasonableness of a contingency amount is significantly related to the stage of decommissioning and the activities projected, including particular site-specific challenges. Consequently, the reasonable contingency factor may vary between nuclear plants and at different stages of decommissioning. (D.14-12-082 at 38). Further, in its April 20, 2017 proposed decision pertaining to PG&Es updated cost estimates for the decommissioning of its two nuclear power plants, the CPUC specifically noted that PG&E use of a 25% contingency factor for Diablo Canyon raised questions in light of other information which had been supplied by PG&Es third-party decommissioning cost consultant, TLG Services, Incorporated (TLG). Specially, TLG estimated contingency on a line item basis and the resulting composite contingency factor was 17.4%.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 44 TABLE 16 CONTINGENCY FACTORS APPLIED IN 2017 DCE 2017 DCE Category Contingency Factor Recorded Costs Through September 2017 0%

ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Substructure Removal 25%

Other Projects 15-25%

Offshore Conduit Removal 25%

ISFSI Demolition 25%

Final Site Restoration 25%

Undistributed Labor 10%

Undistributed Non-Labor 15%

Service Level Agreements 10%

The composite contingency factor included in the 2017 DCE is approximately percent of base estimated costs.

TABLE 17 CONTINGENCY INCLUDED IN THE SONGS 2&3 2017 DCE

($ IN THOUSANDS)

VI.

Additional Discussion Regarding The Project Schedule The SONGS decommissioning project schedule defines the sequence and timing of activities, the completion dates for major project milestones, and the duration of each decommissioning period. The 2017 DCE is presented in 2017 dollars. These constant dollars are spread over the duration of the SONGS entire decommissioning project based on the 2017 DCE project schedule.49 In accordance with the contract, SDS has developed a baseline schedule for completing its major D&D and achieving partial site release. SCE incorporated SDSs Baseline Schedule 49 To assess the adequacy of the amount of funds residing in the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust, the annual constant dollar cash flows are escalated and discounted to present value.

Description 2017 DCE (Nominal /2017$)

2017 DCE (2014$)

1 Base Estimated Costs 2

Estimated Contingency 3

Subtotal Estimated Costs 3,518,663 3,322,641 4

Recorded Costs 1,183,601 1,155,925 5

Total DCE Value 4,702,264 4,478,566

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 45 into the overall decommissioning project schedule on which the 2017 DCE is based. The completion dates were mapped to corresponding 2017 DCE milestones.

As described earlier, the decommissioning schedule is comprised of seven (7) periods.

Each period is generally defined by the major focus of activity on-site, as well as the licensing status of the plant (i.e., from an NRC perspective). SONGS is currently planning and preparing for the physical decommissioning of the plant facilities (Periods 1 and 2). The major D&D work is expected to begin in 2019 and estimated to be completed by late 2028 (Periods 3 and 4). At the conclusion of the major D&D work, all structures, systems, and components on-site will have been removed to at least 3 feet below grade and the NRC Part 50 license will have been reduced to the ISFSI area only.

From 2029 until 2046, when the work to remove the below-grade structures begins, the only significant activity at the site will be the transfer of spent fuel canisters to the DOE (Period 5). During this period, SCE will become informed regarding the regulatory and landowner end-state requirements for the SONGS site. The demolition and removal of the ISFSI and remaining below-grade structures will be performed after 2046 (Periods 6 and 7). This timing of this work is determined in part by the anticipated date by which the DOE is expected to have removed all SONGS spent fuel. The DOE is currently assumed to begin removing SONGS 2&3 spent fuel in 2034 and complete the removal of all fuel by 2049. Final site restoration and license termination is projected to be completed by 2051.

Two critical milestones include the completion of spent fuel transfer operations (i.e.,

transfer of all spent fuel from the wet pools to the ISFSI) in mid-2019 and the completion of major D&D work in late 2028. After each of these milestones, SONGSs licensing status and regulatory requirements change such that the associated costs to manage and support (e.g.,

operations, maintenance, security, management, and contract oversight) the decommissioning of the site will be substantially reduced.

SCE currently anticipates commencing spent fuel transfer operations in 2018 and is targeting completion in early to mid-2019. Fuel transfer operations are relatively complex, subject to extensive regulatory oversight, and intended to be performed 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day, seven days per week. Accordingly, for purposes of this DCE, SCE included schedule margin in its determination of the June 1, 2019 milestone completion date.

The critical activities driving the overall duration of major D&D work are the removal of the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) equipment (e.g., reactor vessels, steam generators, reactor coolant pumps) from inside the containment buildings, and then the decontamination, demolition, and removal of the containment buildings. The decontamination, demolition, and removal of other SONGS buildings and facilities will be performed concurrently.

SCE and SDS are continuing to plan and schedule major D&D work. Currently, SDS intends to complete the physical decommissioning work in 2025 and obtain final NRC approval of the final site survey and partial site release in 2026. SDSs schedule is currently based on performing the preparation and segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and NSSS large component removal at both Units 2 and 3 in parallel. These activities include relatively high-risk

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 46 cutting and material handling operations. As another example of uncertainty that is currently inherent in the major D&D schedule, SCE is currently planning for increased radiological decontamination efforts associated with the below-grade structures that will remain at SONGS after SDS completes its work. Accordingly, for purposes of this DCE, SCE has included schedule margin in its determination of the planned completion date of major D&D in late 2028.50 VII.

Waste Disposal The disposition of waste is a significant activity in the decommissioning of SONGS. A brief description of the waste to be generated from the SONGS decommissioning process is described below. In addition, the estimated quantity of each type of waste is summarized in Table 18 below.

Spent Nuclear Fuel - Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the DOE is responsible for the removal and permanent disposal of all SONGS spent nuclear fuel. In the 2014 DCE, SCE assumed the DOE would begin accepting spent fuel from domestic commercial nuclear power plants in 2024 at the rate published in DOEs July 2004 Acceptance Priority Ranking & Annual Capacity Report. Due to DOE inactivity in the past four years, SCE revised its spent fuel shipping schedule for the 2017 DCE to assume that the DOE will begin accepting spent fuel from the nuclear industry in 2028.

GTCC Waste - GTCC waste will be generated when SDS segments the reactor vessel internals. Additional GTCC waste may reside in the spent fuel pools. GTCC waste cannot be disposed of in a federally licensed low-level radioactive waste (LLRW) disposal facility. As explained above, courts have held that the DOE must accept GTCC waste, but currently there is no disposal facility in the U.S. that is licensed to accept it. Therefore, GTCC waste will be packaged and stored in licensed canisters on the SONGS ISFSI until final disposal.

Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) - 10 C.F.R. § 61 outlines the requirements for LLRW and identifies the criteria for the classifications of waste materials that can be accepted at federally licensed LLRW disposal facilities. SDS will characterize, package, and transport offsite the Class A, Class B, and Class C waste.

Exempt Waste - It is assumed that some waste generated during the decommissioning of SONGS will receive NRC approval to be disposed of at a facility that accepts very low-level waste. According to the NRC, 10 CFR 20.2002 is available for use by licensees for wastes that typically are a small fraction of the Class A limits contained in Part 61, and for which the extensive controls in Part 61 are not needed to ensure protection of public health and safety and the environment. Thus, 10 CFR 20.2002 provides an alternative, safe, risk-informed disposal 50 The 2028 date is generally consistent with the schedule that was assumed in the 2014 DCE.

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 47 method for these materials, which are frequently called very low-level waste (VLLW), or low-activity waste (LAW).51 Non-Radiologically Contaminated Waste - Radiologically clean concrete or debris will be disposed of at an out of state Class III landfill. This material will be scanned for radiological contamination prior to leaving SONGS to meet all applicable regulatory requirements. Non-contaminated reinforcing and structural steel may be recycled.

Non-Radiologically Contaminated Hazardous and Industrial Waste Disposal - Lead shielding and other hazardous materials and chemicals will be removed and properly disposed of during decommissioning. Non-Radioactive contaminated surfaces coated with tightly adhering and undamaged lead-based paint will be removed as non-hazardous building demolition debris.

Table 18 summarizes the estimated waste disposal quantities by class for the remainder of SONGS decommissioning.

TABLE 18 REMAINING WASTE DISPOSAL QUANTITIES 51 Low-Level Waste Disposal Under 10 C.F.R. § 20.2002. U.S. NRC, 21 September 2017, https://www.nrc.gov/waste/llw-disposal/10cfr20-2002-info.html, accessed December 1, 2017.

Description Period 2 Transition and Pool Storage (lbs)

Periods 3 & 4 D&D (lbs)

Period 5 Dry Storage (lbs)

Period 6 Civil Works Project (lbs)

Period 7 ISFSI Demolition &

Final Site Restoration (lbs)

Total (lbs) 1 Start 1/1/2017 1/1/2019 1/1/2029 1/1/2046 1/1/2050 2

End 12/31/2018 12/31/2028 12/31/2045 12/31/2049 12/31/2051 3

Duration (Years) 2.0 10.0 17.0 4.0 2.0 4

Class B, C, GTCC 5

Class B 69,320 69,320 6

Class C 5,700 inc 5,700 7

GTCC 222,800 222,800 8

Class B, C, GTCC Subtotal 5,700 292,120 297,820 9

Class A 10 Class A 395,096,463 502,383 395,598,846 11 Class A - Containerized Waste 7,950 inc 7,950 12 Class A Subtotal 7,950 395,096,463 502,383 395,606,796 13 Other 14 Out of State Landfill / Exempt 489,594,000 1,074,296,250 394,648,923 1,958,539,173 15 Scrap Metal Recycler 105,391,000 71,736,000 10,325,800 187,452,800 16 Other Subtotal 594,985,000 1,146,032,250 404,974,723 2,145,991,973 17 18 Waste Total 13,650 990,373,583 1,146,032,250 405,477,106 2,541,896,589

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate 48 VIII.

References

1. EnergySolutions, 2014 Decommissioning Cost Analysis of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3, September 5, 2014
2. August 20, 2015 letter from NRC to SCE Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer, Mr.

Thomas J. Palmisano (ADAM Accession No.: ML15204A383)

3. Application 14-12-007 Joint Application Of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) And San Diego Gas & Electric Company (U 902-E) For 2014 SONGS Units 2&3 Decommissioning Cost Estimate And Related Decommissioning Issues, December 10, 2014
4. California Public Utilities Commission Decision 16-04-109, Decision Approving Decommissioning Cost Estimate, April 21, 2016
5. State of California State Lands Commission, Lease P.R.C. No. 4862.1, November 19, 1984
6. Department of the Navy, Grant of Easement, May 1964
7. State of California, Executive Order D-62-02, September 2002
8. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors, Regulatory Guide 1.202, February 2005
9. California Public Utilities Commission Proposed Decision A.16-03-006, Decision Approving Decommissioning Cost Estimate, April 20, 2017

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix $

Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule

%

SONGS Units 1, 2, and 3 Spent Fuel Shipping Schedule 2028 DOE Acceptance (as of 1/2/2018)

Unit 1 Fuel Assemblies at Morris Unit 1 Fuel Assemblies in ISFSI Units 2 & 3 Fuel Assemblies in Pools Units 2 & 3 Fuel Assemblies in ISFSI Units 1, 2, & 3 Canisters in ISFSI*

Units 2 & 3 Fuel Assemblies Transferred to ISFSI Units 2 & 3 Canisters Transferred to ISFSI Unit 1 Assemblies Transferred to DOE Unit 2 Assemblies Transferred to DOE**

Unit 3 Assemblies Transferred to DOE**

Units 1, 2, & 3 Canisters Transferred from ISFSI to DOE*

2016 270 395 2,668 792 50 2017 270 395 2,668 792 50 2018 270 395 2,668 792 110 2,220 60 2019 270 395 448 3,012 170 448 1

2020 270 395 3,460 182 2021 270 395 3,460 182 2022 270 395 3,460 182 2023 270 395 3,460 182 2024 270 395 3,460 182 2025 270 395 3,460 182 2026 270 395 3,460 182 2027 270 395 3,460 182 2028 270 395 3,460 182 96 4

2029 270 299 3,460 178 48 2

2030 270 251 3,460 176 120 5

2031 270 131 3,460 171 48 2

2032 270 83 3,460 169 48 2

2033 270 35 3,460 167 2034 270 35 3,460 167 35 48 48 6

2035 270 3,364 161 192 96 12 2036 270 3,076 149 120 168 12 2037 270 2,788 137 48 72 5

2038**

270 2,668 132 74 111 5

2039 270 2,483 127 111 111 6

2040 270 2,261 121 111 74 5

2041 270 2,076 116 2042 270 2,076 116 111 111 6

2043 270 1,854 110 74 111 5

2044 270 1,669 105 111 74 5

2045 270 1,484 100 2046 270 1,484 100 222 222 12 2047 270 1,040 88 74 74 4

2048 270 892 84 222 222 12 2049 270 448 72 208 240 13 2050***

270 59 270 13 2051

  • Excluding GTCC Waste
    • Before 2038, SONGS 2 & 3 fuel assemblies shipped in Areva 24-PTH canisters Beginning in 2038, SONGS 2 & 3 fuel assemblies shipped in Holtec MPC canisters
      • Unit 1 fuel assemblies transferred to DOE from GE facility in Morris, Illinois in TADS (21 assemblies per TAD)

On-Site Transfers (During Year)

On-Site Inventory (Beginning of Year)

Off-Site Transfers (During Year)

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix %

Detailed Project Schedule

%

^Ž&d

^KŽE'^ŽhŽŽ^WŽ

Ž^KE'^^^^

^Ž&d

Ž

&DŽ

Ž

W

^&

KŽ

>

^ZŽ

Ž

/ŽŽ



ŽŽ KŽ

^Ž

ŽŽ

Žh

^

W

Ž

ŽŽŽŽŽ

ŽŽŽŽŽ

ŽE^^^ZŽ

ŽE^^^ZŽŽ hhŽŽŽŽŽ

h/ŽŽ hKŽ

hKŽ

WŽŽŽ

Z

hd

ŽŽŽŽ

ZW

Ž

Z^ZŽ

ZŽ

ZŽ

dŽŽŽŽ hWŽ

h^ZŽ

hŽ hŽ

hd

hW

Ž

h^

ZŽ

hŽ hŽ

h^



/ŽŽ

KŽ

/ŽKŽ

^ZŽŽ

W

Ž

Ž

^ZŽ

ZŽ^

/Ž^

K

Ž h^



/ŽŽ

/ŽKŽ

^ZŽŽ

W

Ž

Ž

^ZŽ ZŽ^/Ž^

hhŽE^^^

hŽW hZs/^Ž hZs^

h>ŽŽZŽ

hŽ

hŽW hZs/^Ž hZs^

h>ŽŽZŽ

Ž,KŽ WŽWŽ^

hŽ

Ž

^

DŽŽ

D

WŽ

Z

ŽŽŽŽZ^^

^Ž>WŽ^ZŽ



ZŽŽ^,W

ŽZŽŽŽŽ

^hŽŽ d

DŽ

&

DŽ



Ž

hZŽWs

h'Ž



&WŽŽd

hDdŽ

KŽŽ

E^^^



t^

D

<tŽ

/^

<<<

DŽ

&&Ž

<^Ž^

h'Ž

<<K

hDdŽ

KWzh

>dŽWEZŽ

DWŽ

dd^Ž

zh

Z^

^W

h'Žd

,D

&Ž

&^^Ž>dŽ

h'Žd

^>

ŽŽŽd

D

D

DŽŽZ^

Z

ŽŽ hŽ

Ž

Ž

Ž

Ž

Ž

&^^

Ž&

ŽŽ

/d ZŽd

DŽtŽ





WŽ

ŽtŽWŽ W>

WŽŽ

tŽWŽ

&'dKŽ W

Ž K

Ž

h&^^s^

WŽ

^ZŽ

Ž

^

ZŽ

/ŽKŽ

Ž

/Ž

Ž

Ž

Ž

hWŽ



KŽ

/ŽKŽ

h&^^s^

&,

h&,



^ZŽŽ W

Ž

Ž

^ZŽ

W

Ž K

Ž

h&^^s^

WŽ

^ZŽ

Ž

^

ZŽ

/ŽKŽ

Ž

/Ž

Ž

Ž

Ž

hWŽ



^ZŽŽ

W

Ž

^ZŽ

K

Ž

/ŽKŽ

Ž

/Ž

Ž

h&^^s^

&,

Ž

Ž

h&,



hŽŽ

hŽŽ h/ŽŽ

hŽ

Ž

ŽŽW

Ž

ŽŽ

^ZŽ

ŽŽ

Ž

ŽŽ

Ž

ŽŽ

ŽŽ

ŽŽ

/ŽŽ

W >dW

^>dŽWŽEZ

EZZŽ>dŽW

>dW^>,^Ž

EZ&^^ŽWŽ

&^^WŽ K



WŽŽ



/

Ž

Ž

hŽ

Ž hŽŽ WŽ



W

DŽ

^&>Ž^

ŽŽ

ŽŽ

Z/

ZŽŽK^ŽŽŽ

ZŽhZŽsŽ^h

%







/RQJ5DQJH621*6'HFRPPLVVLRQLQJ6FKHGXOH







































































&LYLO:RUNV5HTXHVWIRU3URSRVDO 5)3  

2YHUVLJKW7HDP0RELOL]DWLRQ 

&LYLO:RUNV&RQWUDFWRU6HOHFWLRQ 

6LWH'HZDWHULQJ

6XEVWUXFWXUH5HPRYDO

3HUPDQHQW%DFNILOO

,6)6,'HPROLWLRQ $5(9$DQG+ROWHF

2FHDQ&RQGXLW5HPRYDO

 $OO8QLWIXHODW621*6LVH[SHFWHGWREHUHPRYHGIURPWKHVLWHE\\WKHHQGRI

6LWH9HJHWDWLRQ

 3HULRGDOVRLQFOXGHVWKHUHPRYDORI8QLWVXEVWUXFWXUHV

)LQDO/LFHQVH7HUPLQDWLRQ

 7KHVHDFWLYLWLHVRFFXUSULRUWR3HULRG

5HY,VVXHG

6HDZDOO:DONZD\\5HPRYDO

'HZDWHULQJ

,6)6,2QO\\7UDQVLWLRQ

3URJUDP7UDQVLWLRQ

&(4$3HUPLWWLQJ$SSURYDO

,6)6,3DG6HFXULW\\%XLOGLQJ&RPSOHWLRQ

3RROWR3DG&DPSDLJQ

3RROWR3DG&RPSOHWLRQ 3HULRG,QLWLDO$FWLYLWLHV

-XQH'HF

3HULRG7UDQVLWLRQDQG3RRO6WRUDJH

-DQ'HF

3HULRG' 'DQG'U\\6WRUDJH

-XQH'HF

3HULRG' 'DQG3RRO6WRUDJH

-DQ0D\\

3HULRG'U\\6WRUDJH

-DQ'HF

3HULRG&LYLO:RUNV3URMHFW

-DQ'HF

3HULRG,6)6,'HPROLWLRQ )LQDO6LWH5HVWRUDWLRQ

-DQ'HF

3UHSVIRU'HFRPPLVVLRQLQJ

1XFOHDU6WHDP6XSSO\\6\\VWHP 1666

/DUJH&RPSRQHQW5HPRYDO /&5

%XLOGLQJ'HFRQWDPLQDWLRQ

%XLOGLQJ'HPROLWLRQ

/LFHQVHG0DWHULDO5HPRYDO

3DUW/LFHQVH3DUWLDO6LWH5HOHDVH

7HPSRUDU\\%DFNILOO

'*&6HOHFWLRQ

)XHO&DQFHOODWLRQ















%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix &

Detailed Cost Table

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 1

Completed Projects - 2015 NDCTP 1,223 2,671 89,834 (137) 1,563 95,154 2

3 LT-2-D-2 18 Planning & Design For Cold and Dark 1,888 1,008 14,977 1,054 1,373 20,299 4

LT-2-D-2 19 Implement Cold and Dark (Repower Site) 2,151 415 52,191 (663) 1,522 55,615 5

LT-2-D-2 20 Install 12 kV Service Line to Power Temp Power Ring 1,579 2,779 4,746 419 758 10,281 6

LT-2-D-2 21 Drain & De-Energize Non-Essential Systems (DEC Process) 2,363 946 1,299 14 1,487 6,111 7

LT-2-D-2 29 Implement Control Room Modifications (Command Center Relocation) 4 340 3

3 350 8

Completed Activities - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 7,981 5,152 73,553 826 5,143 92,655 9

10 LT-2-D-2 26 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 2 139 2,814 1,159 31 129 4,271 11 LT-2-D-2 27 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 3 139 2,814 1,159 31 129 4,271 12 Completed Activities - Spent Fuel Islanding Subtotal 277 5,627 2,317 63 258 8,543 13 14 LT-2-D-2 07 Prepare Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR) 1 1,991 8

21 2,021 15 Completed Activities - Phase 2 Regulatory Compliance Subtotal 1

1,991 8

21 2,021 16 17 LT-2-D-2 22 Select Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) 1,219 7

11,842 392 809 14,270 18 Completed Activities - DCG RFP & Prep Subtotal 1,219 7

11,842 392 809 14,270 19 20 LT-2-D-LOED (2) Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification 69 1,070 178 (4) 51 1,364 21 LT-D-SPV (2) Special Purpose Vehicle Support 442 6

448 22 LT-3-D-RecB (2) Records Backlog 1,807 186 20 2,014 23 LT-3-D-S&S (2) Simplification & Streamlining Project 1

6 1,329 33 8

1,377 24 Completed Activities - Transition Modifications Subtotal 69 1,076 3,757 215 84 5,202 25 26 Completed Projects And Activities Subtotal 10,771 14,534 183,294 1,368 7,877 217,845 27 28 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 29 SNF-1-D-7 02 Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure (3) 95 16,342 32,106 (12,796) 445 1,026 37,219 30 SNF-2-D-8 07 ISFSI Pad Study 199 2

2 203 31 SNF-2-D-8 08 Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight (4) 1,284 103 76,028 2,808 916 3,589 84,729 32 SNF-2-D-8 09 Construct ISFSI Expansion 96 5

44,885 267 177 4,225 49,655 33 SNF-2-D-8 10 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 2 (5) 24 1,696 27,107 8,978 568 317 38,690 34 SNF-2-D-8 11 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 3 (5) 23 1,696 19,640 8,979 490 528 31,357 35 SNF-2-D-8 12 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 2 (6) 17,684 2,606 20,290 36 SNF-2-D-8 13 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 3 (6) 17,684 2,606 20,290 37 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Subtotal 1,523 19,842 235,332 8,239 2,598 14,899 282,432 38 39 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 40 Prepare Integrated Work Sequence and Schedule for Decommissioning 41 Modify Containment Access-Unit 2 42 Modify Containment Access-Unit 3 43 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 2 44 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 2 45 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 3 46 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 3 47 Prepare Activity Specifications - U2 48 (2) Waste Contracts 49 Install GARDIAN System 50 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 1 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 51 52 Design, Specify, and Procure Special Items and Materials 53 Test Special Cutting and Handling Equipment and Train Operators 54 Finalize Internals and Vessel Segmenting Details - Unit 2 55 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 2 56 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 3 57 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Internals and Vessel Segmentation Subtotal 58 59 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 2 60 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 3 61 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 2 62 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 3 63 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 2 64 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 3 65 Remove Protected Area Security Fencing 66 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Removal Of Spent Fuel Systems/Equipment Subtotal 67 68 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 2 69 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 3 70 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Steam Generator Removal Subtotal 71 72 Upgrade Rail Spur 73 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 2 74 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 3 75 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Non-Essential System Removal Subtotal 76 77 Remove, Package and Dispose of Essential Systems 78 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 2 79 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 2 80 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 3 81 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 3 82 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 2 83 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 3 84 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 2 85 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 3 86 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Large Component Removal Subtotal 87 88 Demolish Service Building (K-10, 20, 30) 89 Demolish South Security Processing Facility (K-70) 90 Demolish South Yard Area Buildings T-10, 20, 60 and Haz Mat 91 Procure Clean Building Demolition Equipment 92 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 3 93 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 2 94 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 2 95 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 2 96 Demolish AWS Building 97 Demolish Building L-50 2 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 98 Demolish Maintenance Building 4 (B-64/B-65) 99 Demolish Maintenance Building 5 (B-62/B-63) 100 Demolish Outage Control Center 101 Demolish Maintenance Building 2 (B-49/B-50) 102 Demolish Maintenance Building 1 (B-43/B-44) 103 Demolish Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 104 Demolish Auxiliary Control Building - Common 105 Remove Systems and Demolish Make-Up Demineralizer Structures 106 Install Concrete Plugs in Intake and Discharge Structures 107 Demolish Intake and Discharge Structures to 3-Feet Below Grade 108 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial Plant Building Demo Subtotal 1

109 110 Decon Containment Building - Unit 3 111 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 3 112 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 113 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 3 114 Decon Containment Building - Unit 2 115 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 2 116 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 2 117 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 2 118 Decon Turbine Building - Unit 2 119 Decon Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 120 Decon Auxiliary Control Building - Common 121 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Building Decontamination Subtotal 2

122 123 Remove Protected Area Pavement 124 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 3 125 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 3 126 Demolish Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 127 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 3 128 Demolish Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 129 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 2 130 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Plant Building Demo Subtotal 131 132 (2) Offshore Conduit Diffuser and Risers 133 134 (2) Backfill 135 136 Demolish Staging Warehouse 137 Demolish Administration Building (K-40/50) 138 Detension and Remove Unit 3 Containment Building Tendons 139 Demolish Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 140 Demolish Unit 3 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 141 Detension and Remove Unit 2 Containment Building Tendons 142 Demolish Safety and MSIV Equipment Building - Unit 2 143 Demolish Unit 2 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 144 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Containment Building Demo Subtotal 145 3 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Cont Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 146 Prepare License Termination Plan 147 Final Status Survey 148 Subsurface Structure Removal Engineering Planning and Design 149 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Survey/License Termination Subtotal 150 151 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 152 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 153 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Waste Subtotal 154 155 156 157 158 159 Other Projects 160 SNF-2-D-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Relicensing (7) 12,550 8

2,441 14,998 161 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1 (2) Holtec ISFSI I&M Program Development (7) 14,892 25 3

2,843 17,763 162 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 2 (2) Holtec ISFSI Relicensing 5,000 1,000 6,000 163 ISFSI Aging Management Subtotal 32,441 32 3

6,284 38,761 164 165 SNF-2-D-EP Holtec (2) Environmental Permitting - Holtec 3,000 600 3,600 166 SNF-2-D-EP Areva (2) Environmental Permitting - Areva 1,650 330 1,980 167 Coastal Development Permit Extension Subtotal 4,650 930 5,580 168 169 SNF-2-D-GTCC (2) GTCC Waste Storage 22,616 5,654 28,270 170 171 SR-1-D-14 01 Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender (8) 526 7,213 25 173 1,118 9,054 172 SR-1-D-14 02 Disposition Hazardous Waste from Mesa Site 113 10 73 195 173 SR-1-D-14 03 Mesa Site Characterization Survey 15 138 (102) 10 61 174 SR-2-D-15 02 Obtain Required Permits - Mesa (9) 55 26 1

82 175 SR-2-D-15 09 Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance (10) 258 42 8,783 64 99 545 9,791 176 SR-2-D-15 11 Demolish Mesa Roads and Parking Lots 396 591 197 1,185 177 SR-2-D-15 12 Finish Grading and Re-vegetate Mesa Site 400 304 141 845 178 Mesa Site Turnover Subtotal 911 838 17,093 13 356 2,001 21,212 179 180 LT-3-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 2,183 375 189 2,747 181 SNF-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 1,000 150 1,150 182 DCE Update Subtotal 3,183 375 339 3,897 183 184 SR-3-D-16 05 Obtain CEQA Permit & Approvals (11) 947 16 5,896 327 433 712 8,331 185 SR-3-D-16 03 Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal and Plant Easement (12) 2,377 9,418 640 647 2,223 15,305 186 SR-D-NEPA 2 (2) Plant Lease Extension 1,397 1,576 45 414 686 4,118 187 SR-D-NEPA 3 (2) Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration 1,663 5,532 54 493 1,548 9,290 188 SNF-D-GTCC Disp (2) GTCC Disposal 36,000 7,200 43,200 189 SNF-2-D-CDP (2) ISFSI CDP Settlement 3,743 800 4,543 190 SR-D-RFP (2) Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 4,741 59 1,406 1,241 7,447 191 SNF-1-D-7 05 Cyber Security Modifications 341 671 8,241 55 336 9,644 192 SNF-D-NIA Sump (2) NIA Sump Modifications 1,000 150 1,150 193 Other Projects Subtotal 12,377 1,583 151,389 2,341 4,088 28,969 200,748 194 4 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 195 Substructure Removal 196 SR-D-BKFL REM (2) Backfill Removal 3,358 2,713 996 1,767 8,833 197 SR-5-D-18 02 Install Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 20,385 10,280 7,666 38,332 198 SR-5-D-18 03 Install Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment and Discharge Controls 29,053 7,263 36,316 199 SR-5-D-18 04 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 292 207 569 267 1,334 200 SR-5-D-18 05 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 166 118 276 140 701 201 SR-5-D-18 06 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 449 344 938 433 2,163 202 SR-5-D-18 07 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,183 1,062 1,819 1,016 5,079 203 SR-5-D-18 08 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,374 4,502 7,880 4,439 22,195 204 SR-5-D-18 09 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 841 828 4,120 1,447 7,237 205 SR-5-D-18 10 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 394 323 801 380 1,899 206 SR-5-D-18 11 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 148 104 256 127 637 207 SR-5-D-18 12 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,789 1,358 5,048 2,049 10,243 208 SR-5-D-18 13 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 292 207 569 267 1,334 209 SR-5-D-18 14 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 166 118 276 140 701 210 SR-5-D-18 15 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 449 344 938 433 2,163 211 SR-5-D-18 16 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,282 1,098 1,819 1,050 5,249 212 SR-5-D-18 17 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,374 4,502 7,881 4,439 22,195 213 SR-5-D-18 18 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 841 828 4,120 1,447 7,237 214 SR-5-D-18 19 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 394 323 801 380 1,899 215 SR-5-D-18 20 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 405 248 256 227 1,137 216 SR-5-D-18 21 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,786 1,356 5,048 2,047 10,237 217 SR-5-D-18 22 Demolish and Backfill Intake Structure Below -3 Feet 10,418 7,867 25,339 10,906 54,529 218 SR-5-D-18 24 Remove Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 11,967 2,992 14,958 219 SR-5-D-18 25 Remove Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment 6,947 1,737 8,684 220 SR-6-D-19 06 Remove and Stockpile Existing Seawall Erosion Protection 11 6

4 21 221 SR-6-D-19 07 Remove Unit 2 and 3 Seawall and Pedestrian Walkway 3,032 3,258 4,606 2,724 13,620 222 SR-6-D-19 08 Remove Remaining Intake and Outfall Box Culvert 464 341 2,211 754 3,770 223 SR-6-D-19 10 Backfill and Compaction of Excavation 2,217 1,495 928 4,640 224 Substructure Removal Subtotal 3,358 60,862 53,084 36,000 75,573 996 57,468 287,340 225 226 Offshore Conduit Removal 227 SR-3-D-16 01 Hydrogeologic Investigation and Outfall Conduit Survey 130 302 104 134 670 228 SR-5-D-18 23 Remove Off Shore Intake and Outfall Conduits 43,901 12,606 19,788 19,074 95,369 229 Offshore Conduit Removal Subtotal 44,031 12,908 104 19,788 19,208 96,039 230 231 ISFSI Demolition 232 SNF D&D-1-D-12 01 Preparation and NRC Review of License Termination Plan 118 161 70 349 233 SNF D&D-2-D-13 01 Install GARDIAN Bulk Assay System 546 137 683 234 SNF D&D-2-D-13 02 Decon Areva Modules (13) 47 111 141 75 374 235 SNF D&D-2-D-13 03 Final Status Survey of ISFSI 82 520 151 753 236 SNF D&D-2-D-13 04 Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules (14) 1,049 1,923 1,270 1,060 5,302 237 SNF D&D-2-D-13 05 Demolish ISFSI Security Building (15) 266 199 528 248 1,240 238 SNF D&D-2-D-13 06 Restore ISFSI Site 512 346 215 1,073 239 SNF D&D-2-D-13 07 Preparation of Final Report on Decommissioning and NRC Review 55 14 69 240 SNF D&D-2-D-13 08 (2) Clean Demo of Holtec ISFSI Pad and Modules 1,946 1,452 4,910 2,077 10,386 241 ISFSI Demolition Subtotal 3,902 4,725 707 6,849 4,046 20,229 242 5 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 243 Final Site Restoration 244 SR-6-D-19 01 Obtain Required Permits and Approvals 20 410 130 140 700 245 SR-6-D-19 03 Procure Site Restoration Equipment 400 100 500 246 SR-6-D-19 12 Install Shoreline Erosion Control and Restoration Features 142 10 38 190 247 SR-6-D-19 13 Remove Railroad Tracks, Rails and Ballast 35 64 25 123 248 SR-6-D-19 14 Remove Gunite Slope Protection 362 267 1,728 589 2,946 249 SR-6-D-19 15 Remove Access Roads and Parking Lots 179 244 106 529 250 SR-6-D-19 16 Finish Grading and Re-Vegetate Site 834 987 455 2,276 251 Final Site Restoration Subtotal 1,973 1,981 130 1,728 1,453 7,267 252 253 Distributed Subtotal 254 255 Labor-Staffing 256 LT-U-1 01 Utility Staff 153,426 544 101,384 1,302 59,298 16,414 332,367 257 SNF-U-2 01 Utility Staff 196,990 399 39,185 1,045 68,546 18,789 324,954 258 SR-U-3 01 Utility Staff 44,437 24 61,492 68 11,056 11,423 128,499 259 Utility Staff Subtotal 394,852 967 202,061 2,415 138,899 46,625 785,820 260 261 LT-U-1 03 Security Force 11,563 4

146 17 2,200 601 14,532 262 SNF-U-2 04 Security Force 163,052 58 2,487 45 54,788 12,148 232,580 263 Security Force Subtotal 174,615 62 2,633 63 56,989 12,749 247,112 264 265 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 569,468 1,029 204,694 2,478 195,888 59,375 1,032,932 266 267 Non-Labor 268 SNF-U-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Aging Management 3,713 557 4,270 269 SNF-U-AM Holtec (2) Holtec ISFSI Aging Management 10,400 1,560 11,960 270 Aging Management Subtotal 14,113 2,117 16,230 271 272 LT-U-1 17 Association Fees and Expenses 3

2,393 2,193 9

540 5,138 273 SNF-U-2 26 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 212 1,838 307 2,357 274 SR-U-3 17 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 481 793 191 1,466 275 Association Fees and Expenses Subtotal 3

3,086 4,825 9

1,039 8,961 276 277 LT-U-1 15 Community Engagement Panel 382 63 2,324 4,285 157 679 7,890 278 SNF-U-2 25 (2) Community Engagement Panel 26 2,440 370 2,836 279 SR-U-3 21 (2) Community Engagement Panel 8

1,933 291 2,232 280 Community Engagement Panel Subtotal 382 63 2,358 8,658 157 1,340 12,958 281 6 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 282 LT-U-1 08 Contracted Services (16) 705 9,613 78,768 7,991 92 6,641 103,810 283 SNF-U-2 11 Contracted Services (16) 349 11,718 62,692 18,422 165 10,528 103,875 284 SR-U-3 06 Contracted Services (16) 19 761 21,008 2,452 18 3,433 27,690 285 SR-U-Bank (2) Bank Fees And Interest (68)

(68) 286 SR-U-Inv Adj (2) Vendor Invoice Adjustment (213)

(1)

(214) 287 Contracted Services Subtotal 1,073 22,092 162,468 28,583 274 20,602 235,092 288 289 LT-U-1 09 DAW Disposal 21 21 290 SNF-U-2 12 DAW Disposal 10 10 291 DAW Disposal Subtotal 32 32 292 293 LT-U-1 25 Decommissioning Advisor 735 6,854 10 25 698 8,322 294 SNF-U-2 28 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 292 44 336 295 SR-U-3 22 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 1,528 229 1,758 296 Decommissioning Advisor Subtotal 735 8,674 10 25 971 10,416 297 298 LT-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 2,696 404 3,100 299 SR-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 746 112 857 300 DGC Executive Oversight Committee Subtotal 3,441 516 3,958 301 302 SNF-U-2 09 Emergency Preparedness Fees 22 150 44,615 90 5,103 49,980 303 Emergency Preparedness Fees Subtotal 22 150 44,615 90 5,103 49,980 304 305 LT-U-1 10 Energy 46,606 137 4,762 51,505 306 SNF-U-2 13 Energy 16,988 31 2,036 19,055 307 SR-U-3 07 Energy 14,814 2,222 17,036 308 Energy Subtotal 78,408 168 9,020 87,596 309 310 LT-U-1 24 Environmental Permits and Fees 2

344 3,348 27 82 3,802 311 SNF-U-2 27 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 676 346 153 1,176 312 SR-U-3 23 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 193 1,460 248 1,901 313 Environmental Permits and Fees Subtotal 2

1,212 5,154 27 484 6,879 314 315 SNF-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 340 51 391 316 SR-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 120 18 138 317 Ground Water Monitoring Subtotal 460 69 529 318 319 LT-U-1 20 Information Technology (17) 2,532 1,605 6,001 6,044 1,687 1,035 18,905 320 SNF-U-2 20 Information Technology (17) 998 3,730 389 768 5,885 321 SR-U-3 15 Information Technology (17) 1,670 2,746 649 760 5,825 322 LT-U-1 21 Telecommunications (18) 1,275 35 137 88 815 2,350 323 LT-U-1 22 Personal Computers (18) 9 9

18 324 SNF-U-2 22 Personal Computers (18) 7 7

325 Information Technology Subtotal 3,808 4,324 12,623 7,171 2,502 2,563 32,991 326 7 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 327 LT-U-1 05 Insurance 1

18,981 1,090 20,072 328 LT-U-1 14 Workers Compensation Insurance (19) 384 384 329 SNF-U-2 06 Insurance 35,022 5,030 40,052 330 SR-U-3 04 Insurance 4,533 680 5,213 331 Insurance Subtotal 1

58,921 6,800 65,722 332 333 LT-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 8,960 (125) 16 1,047 9,899 334 SNF-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 9,533 16 20 1,119 10,688 335 SR-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal (836) 5,285 6

(405) 505 4,555 336 Third-Party Legal Subtotal (836) 23,778 (103)

(369) 2,671 25,142 337 338 LT-U-1 07 NRC Fees 4

10,756 43 964 11,767 339 SNF-U-2 08 NRC Fees 30 17,916 3

2,574 20,523 340 NRC Fees Subtotal 34 28,673 46 3,538 32,291 341 342 LT-U-Office (2) Office Space 20 1,000 153 1,173 343 SNF-U-Office (2) Office Space 356 3

54 413 344 SR-U-Office (2) Office Space 104 37 21 162 345 Office Space Lease Subtotal 480 1,040 228 1,748 346 347 LT-U-1 04 Security Related Expenses 166 216 249 2

56 690 348 SNF-U-2 05 Security Related Expenses 1

1,913 6,562 1,305 10 1,310 11,102 349 SR-U-3 03 Security Related Expenses 2

124 323 116 4

17 586 350 Security Related Expenses Subtotal 4

2,203 7,101 1,671 16 1,383 12,378 351 352 SR-U-3 11 Severance 104,551 1,816 4,142 8,452 4,084 123,044 353 Severance Subtotal 104,551 1,816 4,142 8,452 4,084 123,044 354 355 LT-U-1 06 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 1

69 4,102 350 4,521 356 SNF-U-2 07 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 41,587 6,238 47,825 357 SR-U-3 05 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 2

223 43,225 5,348 48,798 358 Site Lease and Easement Expenses Subtotal 3

292 88,914 11,936 101,145 359 360 SNF-U-SFL (2) Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 28,320 4,248 32,568 361 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE Subtotal 28,320 4,248 32,568 362 363 LT-U-1 19 Tools and Equipment 14 35 49 364 Tools and Equipment Subtotal 14 35 49 365 366 LT-U-1 18 Water (20) 3,890 9

436 4,336 367 SNF-U-2 18 Water (20) 8,275 6

1,119 9,400 368 SR-U-3 13 Water (20) 2,965 443 3,408 369 Water Subtotal 15,130 15 1,998 17,143 370 371 LT-U-1 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 114 1,012 28 8

21 1,183 372 SNF-U-2 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 152 2,305 46 13 127 2,643 373 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Subtotal 266 3,317 74 21 148 3,825 374 375 Non-Labor Subtotal 108,987 30,189 274,329 374,880 11,432 80,859 880,676 8 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 1 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (Nominal / 2017$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 376 377 Service Level Agreements 378 LT-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 32,318 (9) 2,301 30,114 9,098 6,278 80,099 379 SNF-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 7,908 (9) 2,080 9,175 25,896 3,521 48,571 380 SR-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 9,783 (1) 132 8,254 26,401 4,403 48,973 381 Service Level Agreements Subtotal 50,010 (19) 4,514 47,543 61,395 14,202 177,643 382 383 DGC Staffing 384 385 386 Subtotal DGC Staffing 387 388 Undistributed Subtotal 389 390 Total 9 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 1

Completed Projects - 2015 NDCTP 1,236 2,663 88,707 (134) 1,569 94,041 2

3 LT-2-D-2 18 Planning & Design For Cold and Dark 1,887 1,008 14,875 1,067 1,372 20,208 4

LT-2-D-2 19 Implement Cold and Dark (Repower Site) 2,083 412 50,494 (458) 1,479 54,010 5

LT-2-D-2 20 Install 12 kV Service Line to Power Temp Power Ring 1,535 2,746 4,617 413 738 10,050 6

LT-2-D-2 21 Drain & De-Energize Non-Essential Systems (DEC Process) 2,343 946 1,288 16 1,477 6,070 7

LT-2-D-2 29 Implement Control Room Modifications (Command Center Relocation) 4 332 3

3 343 8

Completed Activities - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 7,849 5,116 71,606 1,041 5,069 90,680 9

10 LT-2-D-2 26 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 2 136 2,795 1,125 43 126 4,225 11 LT-2-D-2 27 Install Spent Fuel Pool System Modifications - Unit 3 136 2,795 1,125 43 126 4,225 12 Completed Activities - Spent Fuel Islanding Subtotal 272 5,589 2,251 85 253 8,450 13 14 LT-2-D-2 07 Prepare Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR) 1 1,946 11 20 1,978 15 Completed Activities - Phase 2 Regulatory Compliance Subtotal 1

1,946 11 20 1,978 16 17 LT-2-D-2 22 Select Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) 1,179 7

11,471 406 784 13,847 18 Completed Activities - DCG RFP & Prep Subtotal 1,179 7

11,471 406 784 13,847 19 20 LT-2-D-LOED (2) Large Organism Exclusion Device Modification 66 1,054 171 (3) 49 1,337 21 LT-D-SPV (2) Special Purpose Vehicle Support 424 1

5 430 22 LT-3-D-RecB (2) Records Backlog 1,733 183 19 1,936 23 LT-3-D-S&S (2) Simplification & Streamlining Project 1

6 1,262 50 7

1,325 24 Completed Activities - Transition Modifications Subtotal 67 1,060 3,589 230 81 5,027 25 26 Completed Projects And Activities Subtotal 10,603 14,435 179,568 1,640 7,776 214,024 27 28 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations 29 SNF-1-D-7 02 Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure (3) 95 16,219 30,966 (12,666) 438 986 36,039 30 SNF-2-D-8 07 ISFSI Pad Study 199 2

2 203 31 SNF-2-D-8 08 Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight (4) 1,219 102 72,413 2,808 879 3,450 80,871 32 SNF-2-D-8 09 Construct ISFSI Expansion 92 5

42,362 263 170 4,061 46,953 33 SNF-2-D-8 10 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 2 (5) 24 1,696 25,947 9,012 563 305 37,547 34 SNF-2-D-8 11 Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters - Unit 3 (5) 23 1,696 18,782 8,943 487 508 30,439 35 SNF-2-D-8 12 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 2 (6) 16,574 (1) 2,505 19,078 36 SNF-2-D-8 13 Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations - Unit 3 (6) 16,574 2,505 19,079 37 ISFSI & Fuel Transfer Operations Subtotal 1,453 19,719 223,817 8,362 2,540 14,321 270,210 38 39 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal 40 Prepare Integrated Work Sequence and Schedule for Decommissioning 41 Modify Containment Access-Unit 2 42 Modify Containment Access-Unit 3 43 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 2 44 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 2 45 Remove and Dispose of Missile Shields - Unit 3 46 Remove and Dispose of Reactor Head - Unit 3 47 Prepare Activity Specifications - U2 48 (2) Waste Contracts 49 Install GARDIAN System 50 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial D&D Activities Subtotal 1 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 51 52 Design, Specify, and Procure Special Items and Materials 53 Test Special Cutting and Handling Equipment and Train Operators 54 Finalize Internals and Vessel Segmenting Details - Unit 2 55 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 2 56 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Internals - Unit 3 57 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Internals and Vessel Segmentation Subtotal 58 59 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 2 60 Remove Underground Diesel Tank - Unit 3 61 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 2 62 Remove and Dispose of Spent Fuel Storage Racks - Unit 3 63 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 2 64 Drain Spent Fuel Pool and Process Liquid Waste - Unit 3 65 Remove Protected Area Security Fencing 66 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Removal Of Spent Fuel Systems/Equipment Subtotal 67 68 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 2 69 Remove and Dispose of Steam Generators - Unit 3 70 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Steam Generator Removal Subtotal 71 72 Upgrade Rail Spur 73 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 2 74 Remove, Package and Dispose of Non-Essential Systems - Unit 3 75 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Non-Essential System Removal Subtotal 76 77 Remove, Package and Dispose of Essential Systems 78 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 2 79 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 2 80 Reactor Vessel Insulation Removal and Disposal - Unit 3 81 Segment, Package and Dispose of Reactor Pressure Vessel - Unit 3 82 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 2 83 Remove and Dispose of Pressurizer - Unit 3 84 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 2 85 Remove and Dispose of Turbine Gantry Crane - Unit 3 86 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Large Component Removal Subtotal 87 88 Demolish Service Building (K-10, 20, 30) 89 Demolish South Security Processing Facility (K-70) 90 Demolish South Yard Area Buildings T-10, 20, 60 and Haz Mat 91 Procure Clean Building Demolition Equipment 92 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 3 93 Demolish Diesel Generator Building - Unit 2 94 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 2 95 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 2 96 Demolish AWS Building 97 Demolish Building L-50 2 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 98 Demolish Maintenance Building 4 (B-64/B-65) 99 Demolish Maintenance Building 5 (B-62/B-63) 100 Demolish Outage Control Center 101 Demolish Maintenance Building 2 (B-49/B-50) 102 Demolish Maintenance Building 1 (B-43/B-44) 103 Demolish Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 104 Demolish Auxiliary Control Building - Common 105 Remove Systems and Demolish Make-Up Demineralizer Structures 106 Install Concrete Plugs in Intake and Discharge Structures 107 Demolish Intake and Discharge Structures to 3-Feet Below Grade 108 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Initial Plant Building Demo Subtotal 109 110 Decon Containment Building - Unit 3 111 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 3 112 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 113 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 3 114 Decon Containment Building - Unit 2 115 Decon Penetration Building - Unit 2 116 Decon Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 2 117 Decon Fuel Handling Building - Unit 2 118 Decon Turbine Building - Unit 2 119 Decon Auxiliary Radwaste Building - Common 120 Decon Auxiliary Control Building - Common 121 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Building Decontamination Subtotal 122 123 Remove Protected Area Pavement 124 Demolish Condensate Building and Transformer Pads - Unit 3 125 Demolish Full Flow Area and Turbine Building - Unit 3 126 Demolish Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 127 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 3 128 Demolish Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 129 Demolish Penetration Building - Unit 2 130 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Plant Building Demo Subtotal 131 132 (2) Offshore Conduit Diffuser and Risers 133 134 (2) Backfill 135 136 Demolish Staging Warehouse 137 Demolish Administration Building (K-40/50) 138 Detension and Remove Unit 3 Containment Building Tendons 139 Demolish Safety Equipment and MSIV Building - Unit 3 140 Demolish Unit 3 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 141 Detension and Remove Unit 2 Containment Building Tendons 142 Demolish Safety and MSIV Equipment Building - Unit 2 143 Demolish Unit 2 Containment Building to 3-Feet Below Grade 144 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Containment Building Demo Subtotal 145 3 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 146 Prepare License Termination Plan 147 Final Status Survey 148 Subsurface Structure Removal Engineering Planning and Design 149 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Final Survey/License Termination Subtotal 150 151 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 152 (2) Waste Taxes (Pass Through) 153 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal - Waste Subtotal 154 155 156 157 Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal Subtotal 158 159 Other Projects 160 SNF-2-D-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Relicensing (7) 11,763 7

2,346 14,117 161 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1 (2) Holtec ISFSI I&M Program Development (7) 13,964 24 3

2,733 16,724 162 SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 2 (2) Holtec ISFSI Relicensing 4,686 961 5,647 163 ISFSI Aging Management Subtotal 30,414 32 3

6,040 36,489 164 165 SNF-2-D-EP Holtec (2) Environmental Permitting - Holtec 2,812 577 3,388 166 SNF-2-D-EP Areva (2) Environmental Permitting - Areva 1,546 317 1,864 167 Coastal Development Permit Extension Subtotal 4,358 894 5,252 168 169 SNF-2-D-GTCC (2) GTCC Waste Storage 21,197 5,435 26,632 170 171 SR-1-D-14 01 Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender (8) 494 6,784 27 163 1,075 8,542 172 SR-1-D-14 02 Disposition Hazardous Waste from Mesa Site 113 9

73 195 173 SR-1-D-14 03 Mesa Site Characterization Survey 15 133 (102) 10 56 174 SR-2-D-15 02 Obtain Required Permits - Mesa (9) 54 26 1

81 175 SR-2-D-15 09 Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance (10) 254 42 8,558 62 97 524 9,537 176 SR-2-D-15 11 Demolish Mesa Roads and Parking Lots 381 554 190 1,125 177 SR-2-D-15 12 Finish Grading and Re-vegetate Mesa Site 385 285 135 805 178 Mesa Site Turnover Subtotal 875 807 16,377 14 344 1,923 20,341 179 180 LT-3-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 2,046 360 181 2,588 181 SNF-D-DCE (2) DCE Update 937 144 1,081 182 DCE Update Subtotal 2,983 360 326 3,669 183 184 SR-3-D-16 05 Obtain CEQA Permit & Approvals (11) 902 15 5,573 325 414 685 7,914 185 SR-3-D-16 03 Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal and Plant Easement (12) 2,231 8,836 616 607 2,137 14,427 186 SR-D-NEPA 2 (2) Plant Lease Extension 1,309 1,477 43 388 660 3,878 187 SR-D-NEPA 3 (2) Plant Lease Amendment For Final Site Restoration 1,558 5,185 52 462 1,488 8,745 188 SNF-D-GTCC Disp (2) GTCC Disposal 33,741 6,921 40,662 189 SNF-2-D-CDP (2) ISFSI CDP Settlement 3,508 769 4,277 190 SR-D-RFP (2) Substructure Removal Contractor Procurement 4,444 56 1,318 1,193 7,011 191 SNF-1-D-7 05 Cyber Security Modifications 337 670 7,959 81 332 9,380 192 SNF-D-NIA Sump (2) NIA Sump Modifications 937 144 1,081 193 Other Projects Subtotal 11,657 1,549 142,546 2,293 3,868 27,845 189,758 194 4 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 195 Substructure Removal 196 SR-D-BKFL REM (2) Backfill Removal 3,147 2,608 933 1,698 8,386 197 SR-5-D-18 02 Install Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 19,594 9,635 7,369 36,599 198 SR-5-D-18 03 Install Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment and Discharge Controls 27,926 6,981 34,907 199 SR-5-D-18 04 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 280 194 533 256 1,264 200 SR-5-D-18 05 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 159 111 259 135 664 201 SR-5-D-18 06 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 431 322 879 416 2,048 202 SR-5-D-18 07 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,137 995 1,705 976 4,813 203 SR-5-D-18 08 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,165 4,219 7,386 4,267 21,037 204 SR-5-D-18 09 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 809 776 3,861 1,391 6,838 205 SR-5-D-18 10 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 379 303 751 365 1,798 206 SR-5-D-18 11 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 143 98 240 122 603 207 SR-5-D-18 12 Demolish and Backfill Unit 3 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,719 1,272 4,731 1,969 9,692 208 SR-5-D-18 13 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Condensate Storage Area Below -3 Feet 280 194 533 256 1,264 209 SR-5-D-18 14 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Diesel Generator Building Below -3 Feet 159 111 259 135 664 210 SR-5-D-18 15 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Fuel Handling Building Below -3 Feet 431 322 879 416 2,048 211 SR-5-D-18 16 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Radwaste and Control Building Below -3 Feet 1,233 1,030 1,705 1,009 4,976 212 SR-5-D-18 17 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Turbine Building Structure Below 9 Ft Elevation 5,165 4,219 7,386 4,267 21,038 213 SR-5-D-18 18 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Safety Equipment Building Below -3 Feet 809 776 3,861 1,391 6,838 214 SR-5-D-18 19 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Penetration Area Below -3 Feet 379 303 751 365 1,798 215 SR-5-D-18 20 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Full Flow Building Below -3 Feet 390 232 240 219 1,081 216 SR-5-D-18 21 Demolish and Backfill Unit 2 Containment Building Below -3 Feet 1,716 1,271 4,731 1,968 9,686 217 SR-5-D-18 22 Demolish and Backfill Intake Structure Below -3 Feet 10,013 7,373 23,749 10,483 51,618 218 SR-5-D-18 24 Remove Sheet Piling and Excavation Shoring 11,216 2,876 14,091 219 SR-5-D-18 25 Remove Dewatering System and Effluent Treatment 6,678 1,669 8,347 220 SR-6-D-19 06 Remove and Stockpile Existing Seawall Erosion Protection 10 5

4 20 221 SR-6-D-19 07 Remove Unit 2 and 3 Seawall and Pedestrian Walkway 2,914 2,826 (38) 4,606 2,618 12,927 222 SR-6-D-19 08 Remove Remaining Intake and Outfall Box Culvert 446 210 (18) 2,211 725 3,574 223 SR-6-D-19 10 Backfill and Compaction of Excavation 2,131 1,401 892 4,424 224 Substructure Removal Subtotal 3,147 58,501 49,416 34,547 71,258 933 55,239 273,042 225 226 Offshore Conduit Removal 227 SR-3-D-16 01 Hydrogeologic Investigation and Outfall Conduit Survey 125 283 100 129 637 228 SR-5-D-18 23 Remove Off Shore Intake and Outfall Conduits 42,198 10,838 (163) 19,788 18,334 90,995 229 Offshore Conduit Removal Subtotal 42,323 11,121 (63) 19,788 18,463 91,631 230 231 ISFSI Demolition 232 SNF D&D-1-D-12 01 Preparation and NRC Review of License Termination Plan 111 155 67 333 233 SNF D&D-2-D-13 01 Install GARDIAN Bulk Assay System 525 131 656 234 SNF D&D-2-D-13 02 Decon Areva Modules (13) 45 104 136 72 357 235 SNF D&D-2-D-13 03 Final Status Survey of ISFSI 78 488 145 711 236 SNF D&D-2-D-13 04 Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules (14) 1,009 1,802 1,190 1,019 5,020 237 SNF D&D-2-D-13 05 Demolish ISFSI Security Building (15) 255 186 495 238 1,174 238 SNF D&D-2-D-13 06 Restore ISFSI Site 492 325 206 1,023 239 SNF D&D-2-D-13 07 Preparation of Final Report on Decommissioning and NRC Review 52 13 65 240 SNF D&D-2-D-13 08 (2) Clean Demo of Holtec ISFSI Pad and Modules 1,871 1,361 4,602 1,997 9,831 241 ISFSI Demolition Subtotal 3,750 4,429 680 6,423 3,889 19,171 242 5 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 243 Final Site Restoration 244 SR-6-D-19 01 Obtain Required Permits and Approvals 19 384 125 135 663 245 SR-6-D-19 03 Procure Site Restoration Equipment 385 96 481 246 SR-6-D-19 12 Install Shoreline Erosion Control and Restoration Features 137 9

37 182 247 SR-6-D-19 13 Remove Railroad Tracks, Rails and Ballast 33 60 24 116 248 SR-6-D-19 14 Remove Gunite Slope Protection 348 164 (14) 1,728 566 2,793 249 SR-6-D-19 15 Remove Access Roads and Parking Lots 173 229 102 503 250 SR-6-D-19 16 Finish Grading and Re-Vegetate Site 801 925 438 2,164 251 Final Site Restoration Subtotal 1,897 1,772 111 1,728 1,397 6,905 252 253 Distributed Subtotal 254 255 Labor-Staffing 256 LT-U-1 01 Utility Staff 147,700 538 95,923 1,316 57,551 15,777 318,805 257 SNF-U-2 01 Utility Staff 187,798 394 37,206 1,074 65,874 18,060 310,406 258 SR-U-3 01 Utility Staff 41,681 24 57,641 66 10,379 10,980 120,770 259 Utility Staff Subtotal 377,179 956 190,770 2,457 133,803 44,817 749,981 260 261 LT-U-1 03 Security Force 11,010 4

138 18 2,128 577 13,875 262 SNF-U-2 04 Security Force 155,557 58 2,344 45 52,636 11,677 222,317 263 Security Force Subtotal 166,567 61 2,482 63 54,764 12,255 236,192 264 265 Labor-Staffing Subtotal 543,746 1,017 193,252 2,519 188,567 57,071 986,172 266 267 Non-Labor 268 SNF-U-AM Areva (2) Areva ISFSI Aging Management 3,480 535 4,015 269 SNF-U-AM Holtec (2) Holtec ISFSI Aging Management 9,747 1,499 11,247 270 Aging Management Subtotal 13,227 2,035 15,262 271 272 LT-U-1 17 Association Fees and Expenses 3

2,253 2,122 8

519 4,906 273 SNF-U-2 26 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 198 1,767 296 2,261 274 SR-U-3 17 (2) Association Fees and Expenses 451 762 184 1,397 275 Association Fees and Expenses Subtotal 3

2,903 4,651 8

999 8,564 276 277 LT-U-1 15 Community Engagement Panel 382 63 2,234 4,128 156 653 7,615 278 SNF-U-2 25 (2) Community Engagement Panel 24 2,345 356 2,725 279 SR-U-3 21 (2) Community Engagement Panel 7

1,858 280 2,145 280 Community Engagement Panel Subtotal 382 63 2,265 8,332 156 1,288 12,486 281 6 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 282 LT-U-1 08 Contracted Services (16) 684 9,499 75,723 7,883 75 6,383 100,247 283 SNF-U-2 11 Contracted Services (16) 340 11,309 59,271 17,865 155 10,120 99,060 284 SR-U-3 06 Contracted Services (16) 18 732 19,705 2,361 17 3,300 26,134 285 SR-U-Bank (2) Bank Fees And Interest (67)

(67) 286 SR-U-Inv Adj (2) Vendor Invoice Adjustment (209)

(1)

(210) 287 Contracted Services Subtotal 1,042 21,540 154,700 27,833 247 19,803 225,164 288 289 LT-U-1 09 DAW Disposal 20 20 290 SNF-U-2 12 DAW Disposal 10 10 291 DAW Disposal Subtotal 30 30 292 293 LT-U-1 25 Decommissioning Advisor 730 6,487 16 25 671 7,930 294 SNF-U-2 28 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 274 42 316 295 SR-U-3 22 (2) Decommissioning Advisor 1,432 220 1,653 296 Decommissioning Advisor Subtotal 730 8,193 16 25 934 9,899 297 298 LT-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 2,527 389 2,915 299 SR-U-CO (2) DGC Executive Oversight Committee 699 107 806 300 DGC Executive Oversight Committee Subtotal 3,225 496 3,722 301 302 SNF-U-2 09 Emergency Preparedness Fees 22 144 43,181 89 4,905 48,341 303 Emergency Preparedness Fees Subtotal 22 144 43,181 89 4,905 48,341 304 305 LT-U-1 10 Energy 45,237 134 4,577 49,948 306 SNF-U-2 13 Energy 16,421 30 1,957 18,409 307 SR-U-3 07 Energy 14,239 2,136 16,375 308 Energy Subtotal 75,897 164 8,670 84,732 309 310 LT-U-1 24 Environmental Permits and Fees 2

334 3,317 26 79 3,758 311 SNF-U-2 27 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 633 333 147 1,114 312 SR-U-3 23 (2) Environmental Permits and Fees 181 1,403 238 1,822 313 Environmental Permits and Fees Subtotal 2

1,149 5,053 26 465 6,695 314 315 SNF-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 319 49 368 316 SR-U-GW (2) Ground Water Monitoring 112 17 130 317 Ground Water Monitoring Subtotal 431 66 497 318 319 LT-U-1 20 Information Technology (17) 2,524 1,547 5,684 5,993 1,680 995 18,424 320 SNF-U-2 20 Information Technology (17) 960 3,496 374 738 5,568 321 SR-U-3 15 Information Technology (17) 1,605 2,574 624 730 5,533 322 LT-U-1 21 Telecommunications (18) 1,275 35 137 88 815 2,350 323 LT-U-1 22 Personal Computers (18) 9 9

18 324 SNF-U-2 22 Personal Computers (18) 7 7

325 Information Technology Subtotal 3,799 4,163 11,900 7,080 2,496 2,463 31,900 326 7 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 327 LT-U-1 05 Insurance 1

18,675 1,048 19,723 328 LT-U-1 14 Workers Compensation Insurance (19) 381 381 329 SNF-U-2 06 Insurance 33,712 4,835 38,547 330 SR-U-3 04 Insurance 4,358 654 5,011 331 Insurance Subtotal 1

57,126 6,536 63,663 332 333 LT-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 8,460 (122) 16 1,006 9,359 334 SNF-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal 9,013 15 19 1,076 10,123 335 SR-U-Legal (2) Third-Party Legal (802) 5,013 7

(389) 486 4,315 336 Third-Party Legal Subtotal (802) 22,486 (100)

(353) 2,568 23,799 337 338 LT-U-1 07 NRC Fees 4

10,480 42 927 11,452 339 SNF-U-2 08 NRC Fees 28 17,229 3

2,474 19,735 340 NRC Fees Subtotal 32 27,709 45 3,401 31,187 341 342 LT-U-Office (2) Office Space 19 937 147 1,104 343 SNF-U-Office (2) Office Space 343 3

52 397 344 SR-U-Office (2) Office Space 100 35 20 154 345 Office Space Lease Subtotal 461 975 219 1,655 346 347 LT-U-1 04 Security Related Expenses 160 205 245 2

54 667 348 SNF-U-2 05 Security Related Expenses 1

1,847 6,180 1,261 10 1,259 10,559 349 SR-U-3 03 Security Related Expenses 2

121 309 114 4

16 566 350 Security Related Expenses Subtotal 4

2,129 6,694 1,620 16 1,329 11,792 351 352 SR-U-3 11 Severance 102,979 1,796 4,018 8,329 3,925 121,047 353 Severance Subtotal 102,979 1,796 4,018 8,329 3,925 121,047 354 355 LT-U-1 06 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 1

68 3,996 336 4,401 356 SNF-U-2 07 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 39,974 5,996 45,970 357 SR-U-3 05 Site Lease and Easement Expenses 2

218 41,749 5,141 47,110 358 Site Lease and Easement Expenses Subtotal 3

286 85,719 11,473 97,481 359 360 SNF-U-SFL (2) Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE 26,543 4,083 30,626 361 Loading Spent Fuel & GTCC Waste To DOE Subtotal 26,543 4,083 30,626 362 363 LT-U-1 19 Tools and Equipment 14 34 49 364 Tools and Equipment Subtotal 14 34 49 365 366 LT-U-1 18 Water (20) 3,773 9

419 4,201 367 SNF-U-2 18 Water (20) 7,975 6

1,076 9,056 368 SR-U-3 13 Water (20) 2,850 426 3,276 369 Water Subtotal 14,598 15 1,921 16,534 370 371 LT-U-1 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 113 970 28 8

20 1,139 372 SNF-U-2 02 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies 150 2,192 47 12 122 2,524 373 Utility Staff Health Physics Supplies Subtotal 263 3,162 75 20 142 3,663 374 375 Non-Labor Subtotal 107,408 29,374 260,155 362,842 11,283 77,722 848,786 8 Of 9

%

Appendix C Table 2 Detailed Cost Table By Cost Type (2014 Dollars In Thousands, 100% Share)

Total (2014$)

DCE No.(1)

Description Labor Material Contract Other Disposal Overheads Contingency Total 376 377 Service Level Agreements 378 LT-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 30,319 (9) 2,204 28,976 8,542 6,034 76,066 379 SNF-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 7,435 (8) 1,993 8,847 24,284 3,385 45,935 380 SR-U-SLA (2) Service Level Agreements 9,171 127 7,936 24,745 4,232 46,211 381 Service Level Agreements Subtotal 46,925 (17) 4,324 45,759 57,571 13,651 168,212 382 383 DGC Staffing 384 385 386 Subtotal DGC Staffing 387 388 Undistributed Subtotal 389 390 Total 9 Of 9

%

Notes To Appendix C Notes:

(2) These line items were not included in the 2014 DCE, and therefore a new DCE No. has been created.

(15) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.05 in the 2014 DCE of "Clean Demolition of ISFSI Support Structures" has been updated to "Demolish ISFSI Security Building" to better reflect the associated costs.

(11) The description for DCE line number SR-3-D-16.05 in the 2014 DCE of "Obtain Required Permits and Approvals" has been updated to "Obtain CEQA Permit &

Approvals" to better reflect the associated costs.

(12) The description for DCE line number SR-3-D-16.03 in the 2014 DCE of "Environmental Impacts Analyses for Lease Termination Activities" has been updated to "Initial Real Estate Authorization Renewal and Plant Easement" to better reflect the associated costs.

(13) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Decon AHSMs" has been updated to "Decon Areva Modules" to better reflect the associated costs.

(14) The description for DCE line number SNF D&D-2-D-13.04 in the 2014 DCE of "Clean Demolition of ISFSI AHSMs and Pad" has been updated to "Clean Demo of Areva ISFSI Pad and Modules" to better reflect the associated costs.

(1) The DCE line numbers align to the line numbers in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE. The DCE line numbers indicate the corresponding 2014 DCE (1) NRC cost account, (2) 2014 DCE period, (3) cost type (i.e., distributed or undistributed), and (4) line number. For example, LT-2-D-2.17 in Appendix C of this DCE corresponds to License Termination Period 2 distributed cost line number 2.17 in Appendix D of the 2014 DCE.

(7) In Advice Letter 3589-E, Aging Management recorded costs were included in DCE No. SNF-2-D-AM. In the 2017 DCE, Areva and Holtec Aging Management costs are estimated separately, and therefore the Areva and Holtec recorded costs are also shown separately and are included in DCE Nos. SNF-2-D-AM Areva and SNF-2-D-AM Holtec 1.

(8) The description for DCE line number SR-1-D-14.01 in the 2014 DCE of "Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment" has been updated to "Mesa Site Phase I and II Site Assessment and Lease Surrender" to better reflect the associated costs.

(9) The description for DCE line number SR-2-D-15.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Obtain Required Permits For Mesa, South Access and South Yard" has been updated to "Obtain Required Permits - Mesa" to better reflect the associated costs.

(10) The description for DCE line number SR-2-D-15.09 in the 2014 DCE of "Demolish Mesa Buildings" has been updated to "Mesa Buildings - Demo, Maintenance" to better reflect the associated costs.

(3) The description for DCE line number SNF-1-D-7.02 in the 2014 DCE of "Design and Fabricate Spent Fuel Canisters" has been updated to "Holtec Long Lead Items and Areva Contract Closure" to better reflect the associated costs.

(4) The description for DCE line number SNF-2-D-8.08 in the 2014 DCE of "Design ISFSI Expansion" has been updated to "Design ISFSI Expansion, Fuel Inspection, and Oversight" to better reflect the associated costs.

(5) The description for DCE line numbers SNF-2-D-8.10 and SNF-2-D-8.11 in the 2014 DCE of "Purchase and Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters and AHSMs" for Units 2 & 3, respectively, have been updated to "Fabrication of Spent Fuel Canisters" to better reflect the associated costs.

(6) The description for DCE line numbers SNF-2-D-8.12 and SNF-2-D-8.13 in the 2014 DCE of "Deliver and Load Spent Fuel Canisters and Transfer to ISFSI" for Units 2 & 3, respectively, have been updated to "Load Fuel Canisters and Fuel Transfer Operations" to better reflect the associated costs.

1 Of 2

%

Notes To Appendix C (19) Estimated costs (i.e., 2017-2051) for workers compensation insurance are included in DCE line items LT-U-1.05, SNF-U-2.06, and SR-U-3.04, "Insurance."

(21) The undistributed DGC staffing costs associated with the fixed price contract are included in the distributed project for Decontamination, Demolition, & Disposal.

(20) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.18, SNF-U-2.18, and SR-U-3.13 in the 2014 DCE of "Utilities (Water, Gas, Phone)" has been updated to "Water" to better reflect the associated costs.

(16) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.08, SNF-U-2.11, and SR-U-3.06 in the 2014 DCE of "Materials and Services" has been updated to "Contracted Services" to better reflect the associated costs.

(17) The description for DCE line numbers LT-U-1.20, SNF-U-2.20, and SR-U-3.15 in the 2014 DCE of "Non-Process Computers" has been updated to "Information Technology" to better reflect the associated costs.

(18) All estimated (i.e., 2017-2051) undistributed Information Technology costs that are not covered by the IT Service Level Agreement are captured in DCE line items LT-U-1.20, SNF-U-2.20, and SR-U-3.15, "Information Technology," and therefore DCE line items LT-U-1.21, LT-U-1.22, and SNF-U-2.22 for Telecommunications and Personal Computers do not include any estimated costs.

2 Of 2

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix '

Annual Cash Flow Tables By NRC Cost &DWHJRU\\

%

Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,591 40,988 121,967 2014 56,443 39,579 12,731 108,753 2015 63,557 55,132 25,520 144,209 2016 43,464 62,700 1,044 107,208 2017 104,155 67,490 4,667 176,313 2018 61,943 68,965 3,710 134,618 Pd 3 2020 58,306 15,799 1,847 75,951 2021 141,012 8,718 2,240 151,971 2022 153,239 8,077 22,202 183,517 2023 65,533 5,536 52,406 123,475 2024 40,938 5,423 32,450 78,811 2025 31,276 5,344 24,942 61,562 2026 60,901 5,747 15,901 82,548 2027 17,045 5,536 41,145 63,726 2028 19,853 5,678 1,871 27,402 2029 9,883 1,241 11,124 2030 9,842 9,842 2031 10,224 20 10,244 2032 10,528 24 10,552 2033 12,192 18 12,209 2034 12,170 18 12,187 2035 13,401 20 13,422 2036 12,628 12,628 2037 11,127 11,127 2038 10,971 10,971 2039 11,445 11,445 2040 11,363 68 11,431 2041 10,905 45 10,950 2042 11,626 43 11,669 2043 11,629 27 11,656 2044 11,041 4,317 15,359 2045 10,440 4,308 14,748 2046 8,600 29,378 37,977 2047 7,150 76,564 83,714 2048 8,454 62,150 70,604 2049 35,143 14,931 50,074 2050 12,763 12,744 25,507 2051 6,125 23,682 29,807 Total

$ 1,007,333 697,217 523,173

$ 2,227,722 Appendix D Table 1-A Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC&RVW &DWHJRU\\ - Unit 2 Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition

& Final Site Restoration Nominal / 2017 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 49,280 27,254 9,911 86,445 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage

%

Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,161 40,988 121,538 2014 56,270 39,421 12,731 108,422 2015 63,601 47,813 27,164 138,577 2016 43,688 65,477 5,157 114,322 2017 99,851 69,885 15,574 185,310 2018 62,289 70,530 11,543 144,362 Pd 3 2020 76,967 17,443 5,994 100,404 2021 122,673 10,562 8,131 141,366 2022 118,848 9,931 27,672 156,451 2023 65,340 7,406 55,726 128,472 2024 46,564 7,293 39,281 93,137 2025 53,899 7,214 37,747 98,860 2026 51,797 6,684 23,721 82,202 2027 23,351 6,473 40,386 70,210 2028 19,859 6,615 1,895 28,369 2029 10,908 1,241 12,150 2030 10,811 10,811 2031 11,192 834 12,027 2032 11,568 1,011 12,579 2033 13,203 749 13,952 2034 13,174 757 13,930 2035 14,552 867 15,420 2036 13,700 13,700 2037 12,199 12,199 2038 12,100 12,100 2039 12,517 12,517 2040 12,435 2,879 15,314 2041 12,034 1,916 13,950 2042 12,698 1,804 14,502 2043 12,701 1,123 13,824 2044 12,688 9,105 21,794 2045 11,972 8,718 20,690 2046 9,654 29,648 39,302 2047 8,492 76,834 85,326 2048 9,508 61,774 71,282 2049 36,198 34,134 70,331 2050 12,763 66,431 79,194 2051 6,125 72,005 78,130 Total 997,833 735,025 741,683

$ 2,474,542 Appendix D Table 1-B Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC &RVW&DWHJRU\\ - Unit 3 Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition

& Final Site Restoration Nominal / 2017 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 52,448 28,927 16,145 97,520 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage

%

Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,591 40,988 121,967 2014 56,443 39,579 12,731 108,753 2015 62,388 54,147 25,017 141,552 2016 41,851 60,067 1,026 102,945 2017 97,798 63,427 4,397 165,622 2018 58,415 64,919 3,512 126,845 Pd 3 2020 54,947 14,904 1,767 71,617 2021 132,808 8,224 2,138 143,170 2022 144,304 7,618 20,915 172,837 2023 61,728 5,225 49,370 116,323 2024 38,580 5,120 30,609 74,309 2025 29,487 5,044 23,539 58,070 2026 57,385 5,423 15,014 77,822 2027 16,089 5,226 38,808 60,123 2028 18,764 5,358 1,787 25,909 2029 9,361 1,170 10,531 2030 9,325 9,325 2031 9,680 19 9,698 2032 9,965 22 9,988 2033 11,534 17 11,550 2034 11,513 17 11,529 2035 12,671 19 12,691 2036 11,946 11,946 2037 10,530 10,530 2038 10,383 10,383 2039 10,835 10,835 2040 10,754 64 10,818 2041 10,323 43 10,365 2042 11,004 40 11,044 2043 11,003 25 11,028 2044 10,452 4,057 14,510 2045 9,889 4,049 13,938 2046 8,106 27,855 35,962 2047 6,743 72,797 79,540 2048 7,972 58,788 66,760 2049 33,100 14,123 47,223 2050 12,071 12,050 24,121 2051 5,804 22,433 28,238 Total 957,823 665,525 498,584

$ 2,121,932 Appendix D Table 2-A Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC &RVW&DtHJRU\\ - Unit 2 2014 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 46,449 25,691 9,376 81,515 Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition

& Final Site Restoration Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project

%

Period Year License Termination Spent Fuel Management Site Restoration Total 2013 40,388 40,161 40,988 121,538 2014 56,270 39,421 12,731 108,422 2015 62,436 46,872 26,631 135,939 2016 42,075 63,001 4,981 110,057 2017 93,754 65,719 14,650 174,122 2018 58,747 66,431 10,886 136,065 Pd 3 2020 72,511 16,489 5,671 94,671 2021 115,546 9,997 7,703 133,246 2022 111,934 9,400 26,065 147,399 2023 61,546 7,022 52,495 121,063 2024 43,875 6,917 37,039 87,831 2025 50,781 6,841 35,592 93,213 2026 48,817 6,323 22,375 77,514 2027 22,025 6,126 38,094 66,245 2028 18,770 6,258 1,810 26,839 2029 10,345 1,170 11,515 2030 10,255 10,255 2031 10,610 786 11,396 2032 10,963 952 11,916 2033 12,505 705 13,210 2034 12,477 712 13,189 2035 13,776 816 14,592 2036 12,976 12,976 2037 11,560 11,560 2038 11,467 11,467 2039 11,865 11,865 2040 11,784 2,710 14,494 2041 11,407 1,803 13,210 2042 12,034 1,698 13,732 2043 12,033 1,057 13,090 2044 12,023 8,565 20,588 2045 11,351 8,201 19,552 2046 9,120 28,115 37,235 2047 8,027 73,056 81,083 2048 8,986 58,430 67,416 2049 34,114 32,373 66,487 2050 12,071 63,258 75,328 2051 5,804 68,532 74,336 Total 948,906 701,836 705,892

$ 2,356,634 Appendix D Table 2-B Annual Cash Flow Table By NRC&RVW&DWHJRU\\ - Unit 3 Pd 5 - Dry Storage Pd 6 - Civil Works Project Pd 7 - ISFSI Demolition

& Final Site Restoration 2014 Dollars in Thousands Pd 1 - Initial Activities Pd 2 -Transition & Pool Storage 2019 49,431 27,304 15,243 91,978 Pd 4 - D&D and Dry Storage

%

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2&3 2017 Decommissioning Cost Estimate Appendix (

6KDUH2I/LDELOLW\\)RU621*63DUWLFLSDQWV

%

Appendix E Share Of Liability For SONGS ParticipanWV Note:

SDG&E, Riverside, and Anaheim incur additional costs related to oversight activities that are not included in the 2017 DCE.

Cost Categories SDG&E Riverside Anaheim SCE SONGS 1 20%

0%

0%

80%

SONGS 2 20%

1.79%

2.4737%

75.7363%

SONGS 3 20%

1.79%

2.4625%

75.4775%

Common Facilities (Units 2 & 3) 20%

1.79%

2.4681%

75.7419%

SONGS 1 Fuel 20%

0%

0%

80%

SONGS 2/3 Fuel 20%

1.79%

2.3398%

75.8702%

ISFSI Maintenance and D&D 20%

1.6066%

2.2686%

76.1248%

San Diego Switchyard 100%

0%

0%

0%

Edison Switchyard 0%

0%

0%

100%

Interconnection Facilities 50%

0%

0%

50%

Nuclear Fuel Cancellation Charges 20%

1.79%

0%

78.21%

%

Appendix C Reconciliation - Confidential

Appendix D Declaration of Todd R. Adler Regarding the Confidentiality of Certain Data

D-1 SCEs 2018 NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING COST TRIENNIAL PROCEEDING 1

DECLARATION OF TODD R. ADLER 2

REGARDING THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF CERTAIN DATA 3

4 I, Todd R. Adler, declare and state:

5

1. I am employed by Southern California Edison (SCE) as a Principal Manager for Nuclear 6

Projects Management, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). In my position as Principal 7

Manager, I have responsibility regarding the Decommissioning General Contractor (DGC) 8 Agreement between SCE, EnergySolutions Services, Inc. (EnergySolutions), and AECOM Energy &

9 Construction, Inc. (AECOM), dated December 20, 2016 (DGC Agreement). EnergySolutions and 10 AECOM formed a joint venture known as SONGS DecommissioningSolutions (SDS). I also am 11 familiar with the Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Agreement between SCE and 12 Holtec International (ISFSI Agreement), dated December 5, 2015. I had responsibility for overseeing 13 and reviewing Exhibits SCE-03 and SCE-05, which contain certain confidential information 14 pertaining to the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement. Thomas J. Palmisano, Vice President of 15 SONGS Decommissioning and Chief Nuclear Officer, delegated authority to me to sign this 16 declaration regarding the confidentiality of this information, as described below.

17

2. I am making this declaration in accordance with the instructions set forth in Decision 16-18 08-024 and Decision 17-09-023 of R. 14-11-001, which were issued August 25, 2016, and September 19 28, 2017, respectively, and govern the submission of confidential documents to the Commission.

20

3. I have personal knowledge of the facts and representations herein and, if called upon to 21 testify, could and would do so, except for those facts expressly stated to be based upon information 22 and belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true.

23

4. Listed below are the data for which SCE is seeking confidential protection and the basis 24 for SCEs confidentiality request. Paragraphs 5-10 also provide additional reasons supporting SCEs 25 confidentiality claim.

26

D-2 Location of Confidential Data Pages (if available)

Description of Information that is Confidential Basis for SCEs Confidentiality Claim Exhibit SCE-03 8, 14, 20-21, 37-38 Appendix B, DCE, pp. B-9, 18-19, 21, 23, 34-35, 45-47, 49, 60-63, 65, 68-72, 74,

77.

Appendix C, p. C-1.

1. DGC Agreement contract terms, including decommissioning plans and pricing terms contained therein.
2. Contingency and cost-estimating information pertaining to the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement.

California Gov.

Code § 6255 (the public interest served by not disclosing the information is clearly outweighed by the public interest served by disclosure of the record).

Exhibit SCE-05 34

1. DGC Agreement contract terms, including decommissioning plans and pricing terms contained therein.

California Gov.

Code § 6255 (the public interest served by not disclosing the information is clearly outweighed by the public interest served by disclosure of the record).

5. Both the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement require SCE to make reasonable efforts 1

to protect the confidentiality of the terms and conditions in the agreements. The agreements require 2

confidentiality because they contain commercially sensitive pricing terms and proprietary 3

information, such as work sequencing and scope. If this information was publicly disclosed without 4

protection, competitors, including potential vendors for decommissioning sub-contract work and 5

other activities, could mis-use the information to the detriment of SCEs customers. For example, if 6

a vendor seeking to bid on a subcontract or another activity knew the DGC Agreement or ISFSI 7

Agreement pricing terms, the vendor would have an opportunity to adjust its bid prices (e.g., the 8

vendor could bid higher than it otherwise may have bid).

9

6. Public release of this information could also hinder SCEs ability to obtain favorable 10 contract terms for related decommissioning work not covered under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI 11 Agreement. For example, if a vendor (who SCE has not yet contracted with for SONGS 12 decommissioning) was aware of various terms in the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, the 13

D-3 vendor could mis-use this information during contract negotiations to extract terms favorable to the 1

vendor that the vendor may not have otherwise sought.

2

7. Finally, it is also in the best interest of the long-term success of the SONGS 3

decommissioning project that SDS and Holtec remain commercially competitive throughout the 4

terms of the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, respectively. Both agreements are long-term 5

agreements that will require SDS and Holtecs continued performance for the next decade and 6

beyond. If information regarding the agreements was disclosed without protection, their competitors 7

could mis-use the information against them during the bidding process for other decommissioning 8

projects across the world and potentially threaten the financial health of both companies. This in 9

turn could threaten the companies ability to complete contractually required services for SONGS in 10 the future without interruption.

11

8. The other category of information that SCE seeks to maintain as confidential is 12 contingency. SCE has applied various contingency amounts on the remaining decommissioning 13 work identified in the 2017 SONGS 2&3 decommissioning cost estimate (DCE) submitted in this 14 proceeding, including work to be completed under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement.

15 The contingency reflects SCEs judgment of potential costs, based on the technical complexity, 16 contracting status, estimating approach, and timing, of the remaining work scope. It is in SCE 17 customers interest for contingency included for the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement to be 18 protected as confidential, because the disclosure of the information without protection could allow 19 vendors to mis-use the information to the detriment of SCEs customers. For example, if a vendor 20 (including SDS, Holtec, or one of their competitors) knew the contingency SCE has applied in the 21 2017 DCE to work to be completed under the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, the vendor 22 would have an opportunity to manipulate its negotiating strategy pertaining to new contracts and/or 23 change orders regarding that work (e.g., the vendor could demand higher prices than it otherwise 24 would have demanded).

25

D-4

9. The confidential information identified in Paragraph 4 cannot be provided in a form that 1

can be further aggregated, redacted, summarized, masked, or otherwise protected in a manner that 2

would allow partial disclosure of the data while protecting confidential information.

3

10. For the reasons described above, the confidential information should be protected from 4

public disclosure. Information regarding the DGC Agreement and ISFSI Agreement, including the 5

pricing terms of those agreements and contingency SCE applied in the 2017 DCE for work 6

remaining under those agreements, is market sensitive information that should remain confidential 7

under GO-66-C Section 2.2(b) (unfair business advantage) and GO 66-C Section 2.8 8

(Information obtained in confidence from other than a business regulated by this Commission 9

where the disclosure would be against the public interest).

10 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing 11 is true and correct.

12 Executed on March 13, 2018 at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, near San Clemente, 13 California.

14

/s/ Todd R. Adler 15 Todd R. Adler 16

Appendix E SONGS Mesa Lease and Station Easement Boundaries

Path: P:\\Data\\DataConfidential\\SONGS\\MiscMaps\\20150203_EasementMaps\\SONGS_ParcelMap_bw.mxd SONGS Mesa Lease and Station Easement Boundaries Date: 3/12/2018 File Name: SONGS_ParcelMap_bw.mxd Version #: 03 Created By: E. Garcia Real Properties Geospatial Analysis I

0 0.1 0.2 0.05 Miles 1 in = 0.1 miles Features depicted herein are planning level accuracy, and intended for informational purposes only.

Distances and locations may be distorted at this scale. Always consult with the proper legal documents or agencies regarding such features. Real Properties Department Thomas Bros. Maps is a registered trademark of Rand McNally & Company.

Reproduced with permission granted by Rand McNally & Company. © Rand McNally & Company.

All rights reserved.

Service Layer Credits: Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus Parcel 5 Parcel 6 Parcel 7 Parcels 8 and 9 Plant Site

(

An EDISON INTERNATIONALC!.' Compll.lly ATTN: Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 March 20, 2018

Subject:

Docket Nos. 50-206, 50-361, 50-362, and 72-41 10 CFR 50.82(a){8)(v-vii) and 10 CFR 72.30(c)

Decommissioning Funding Status Report San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation

Dear Sir or Madam:

Al Bates Manager, Regulatory Affairs &

Oversight 10 CFR 50.82 10 CFR 72.30 As required by 1 O CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v), 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii), and 10 CFR 72.30(c), this letter provides the status of the decommissioning funding for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (San Onofre) Units 1, 2, and 3 and the San Onofre Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) as of December 31, 2017 Based on the requirements in 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) and 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(vii), this information is reported on an annual basis for SONGS Units 1, 2, and 3 because the units were permanently shut down and site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (DCEs)have been submitted for each of these units. In addition, based on the requirements in 10 CFR 72.30(c),

information demonstrating the adequacy of funding for the San Onofre ISFSI is reported at intervals not to exceed three years, and is included. The required information for Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, the City of Anaheim, and the City of Riverside is provided in the Enclosure.

There are no commitments contained in this letter or its enclosure.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at (949) 368-6945.

fboi

vHf; 5 0 I

/V!>A S~ -z_(p

'~(Lf--

Nrv1 S5

Document Control Desk 2

Enclosure:

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and ISFSI Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2017 cc: K. Kennedy, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV M. G. Vaaler, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 W. C. Allen, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre ISFSI

Enclosure San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)

Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Calendar Year 2017

San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 1, 2, and 3 and Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)

Decommissioning Funding Status Report For Calendar Year 2017 San Onofre Unit 1 was a pressurized water reactor (PWR) rated at 1347 MWt. San Onofre Units 2 and 3 were pressurized water reactors (PWR) rated at 3438 MWt.

Provided below is the information required by 10 CFR 50.82(a)(8)(v) and (vii) for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3; and the information required by 10 CFR 72.30(b) for the San Onofre ISFSI. This information is reported every year for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 because site-specific decommissioning cost estimates (DCEs) have been submitted for them and they are currently being decommissioned.

The San Onofre ISFSI is located on the partially decommissioned site of San Onofre Unit 1, and is operated under a 10 CFR 72 General License issued to the holders of a 10 CFR 50 license.

The SONGS Unit 1 co-owners are reported as follows:

Southern California Edison (SCE)

San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) 80.00 %

20.00 %

100.00 %

The San Onofre Units 2 and 3 co-owners are reported as follows:

Southern California Edison (SCE)

San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E)

City of Anaheim (Anaheim)

City of Riverside (Riverside) 78.21 %

20.00 %

0.00 %

1.79 %

The decommissioning liability is shared between the current owners and former owner, Anaheim, as set forth below for each unit:

Owner SCE SDG&E Anaheim Riverside Unit 1 Decommissioning Liabilit 80.00%

20.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Unit 2 Decommissioning Liabilit 75.7363%

20.0000%

2.4737%

1.7900%

All dollar amounts are in 100% share, 2017 dollars.

Unit 3 Decommissioning Liability 75.7475%

20.0000%

2.4625%

1.7900%

1)

The estimated costs to decommission San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3, and the San Onofre ISFSI, including all decommissioning and spent fuel storage costs estimated to be required pursuant to 10 CFR 50.75(b) and (c); 10 CFR 50.54(bb);

and 10 CFR 72.30(b) are shown below:

The site-specific estimates for decommissioning include the following radiological decommissioning costs associated with terminating the site license pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 75(b ); non-radiological site restoration costs; spent fuel storage costs pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(bb ); and ISFSI decommissioning costs pursuant to 10 CFR 72.30(b):

Estimate of License Termination Costs Less: Lie. Term. Costs during 2017 "To Go" License Termination Costs Estimate of Site Restoration Costs Less: Site Restor. Costs during 2017 "To Go" Site Restoration Costs Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs Less: Fuel Storage Costs during 2017 "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs Total Unit 1 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018 Estimate of License Termination Costs Less: Lie. Term. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" License Termination Costs Estimate of Site Restoration Costs Less: Site Restor. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" Site Restoration Costs San Onofre Unit 1 (1>

76.8 million 1.3 million 75.5 million 92.6 million 0.3 million 92.3 million 46.0 million 0.4 million 45.6 million 5.3 million

$ 218.7 million San Onofre Unit 2(2>

$1,017.0 million

$ 305.2 million

$ 711.8 million

$ 527.8 million 90.5 million

$ 437.3 million Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs

$ 687.0 million Less: Fuel Storage Costs through 12/31/2017 $ 259.0 million "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs

$ 428.0 million Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs Total Unit 2 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018 18.9 million

$1,596.0 million

Estimate of License Termination Costs Less: LiG. Term. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" License Termination Costs San Onofre Unit 3(2)

$1,007.5 million

$ 302.5 million

$ 705.0 million Estimate of Site Restoration Costs

$ 7 46.6 million Less: Site Restor. Costs through 12/31/2017 "To Go" Site Restoration Costs

$ 102.2 million

$ 644.4 million Estimate of Fuel Storage Costs

$ 724.6 million Less: Fuel Storage Costs through 12/31/2017 $ 254.7 million "To Go" Fuel Storage Costs

$ 469.9 million Estimate of ISFSI Decommissioning Costs Total Unit 3 "To Go" Costs as of 1/1/2018 18.9 million

$1,838.2 million The site-specific decommissioning cost estimates for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 and the San Onofre ISFSI include: (1) the cost to perform all decommissioning activities; (2) the cost of meeting the 10 CFR 20.1402 radiological criteria for unrestricted site use; and (3) adequate contingency factors for all costs.

2)

Each San Onofre co-owner has established one or more external sinking trust fund accounts as provided in 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1 )(ii) for their respective shares of the San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 decommissioning obligation, which also includes the San Onofre ISFSI. The Decommissioning Trust Fund amounts remaining at the end of calendar year 2017 (net of pending Trust Fund withdrawals and estimated capital gains taxes) are:(3)(4)(5)

Co-Owner SCE SDG&E (5)

Anaheim (5)

Riverside (5)

TOTAL San Onofre Unit 1

$ 303.5 million

$ 150.5 million N/A N/A

$ 454.0 million San Onofre Unit 2

$ 1, 180.4 million 357.5 million 52.2 million 27.9 million

$ 1,618.0 million San Onofre Unit 3

$ 1,370.9 million 412.5 million 52.2 million 30.8 million

$ 1,866.4 million

3)

Each San Onofre co-owner deposits its decommissioning fund contributions into their respective external sinking fund accounts as provided in 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii). The annual amounts projected to be collected in 2018 are:

Co-Owner SCE SDG&E (5)

Anaheim (5)

Riverside (5)

TOTAL San Onofre Unit 1

$ 0.0 million

$ 0.0 million N/A N/A

$ 0.0 million San Onofre Unit 2 San Onofre Unit 3 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million 0.0 million

4)

The amounts spent on San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 decommissioning work performed during 2017 are summarized below:

Cost Category San Onofre Unit 1 License Term.

1.5 million Site Restoration 0.9 million Spent Fuel Storage $

0.6 million ISFSI Decom.

0.0 million TOTAL 3.0 million San Onofre Unit 2

$ 91. 7 million 5.5 million

$ 52.3 million 0.0 million

$ 149.5 million San Onofre Unit 3

$ 88.9 million

$ 11.3 million

$ 53.3 million 0.0 million

$ 153.5 million

5)

The composite escalation rate and after tax investment rates of return for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 Decommissioning are summarized below:

Composite Rate Rate of Return Escalation Real Earnings Rate San Onofre Unit 1 3.17%

2.69%

0.48%

San Onofre Unit 2 3.32%

2.91%

0.41%

San Onofre Unit 3 3.32%

2.91%

0.41%

The composite investment rates of return less the composite escalation rates yield composite real earnings rates less than the 2% real rate of return allowed under 10 CFR 50.75(e)(1)(ii).

6)

None of the co-owners of San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 or the San Onofre ISFSI is relying on any contracts for the purposes of providing decommissioning funding pursuant to 10 CFR 50. 75(e)(1 )(v). There have been no modifications to the method of providing financial assurance.

7)

The amounts of decommissioning funds available as of December 31, 2017 for San Onofre Units 1, 2, and 3 License Termination, Site Restoration, Spent (Irradiated) Fuel Management, and ISFSI Decommissioning costs are shown in the tables below:(4)

Estimated San Onofre Unit 1 "To Go" Cost 12/31/2017 Decommissioning Ratios Net Trust Balance Cost License Termination Costs 75.5 million 34.5%

$ 156.7 million Site Restoration Costs 92.3 million 42.2%

$ 191. 7 million Spent Fuel Management Costs 45.6 million 20.8%

94.6 million ISFSI Decommissioning Costs 5.3 million 2.4%

11.0 million TOTAL

$ 218.7 million 100.0%

$ 454.0 million

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19311C711&oldid=4798801"