|
|
Line 18: |
Line 18: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group One Cook Place Bridgman, MI 49106 aep.com February 8, 2006 AEP:NRC:6321 10 CFR 50.109 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Docuament Control Desk Mail Stop O-P1-17 Washington., DC 20555-0001 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Implementation of Degracled Voltage Protection Backfit | | {{#Wiki_filter:0_ |
| | Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group INDIANA One Cook Place MICHIGAN Bridgman, MI 49106 POWER aep.com February 8, 2006 AEP:NRC:6321 10 CFR 50.109 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Docuament Control Desk Mail Stop O-P1-17 Washington., DC 20555-0001 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Implementation of Degracled Voltage Protection Backfit |
|
| |
|
| ==References:== | | ==References:== |
| | : 1) Letter from C. Haney, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), to M. K. Nazar, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), 'Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Imposition of Facility-Specific Backfit Re: |
| | Degraded Voltage Protection System (TAC Nos. MC5735 and 5736)," dated November 9, 2005, ML050680057. |
| | : 2) Letter from J. N. Jensen, I&M, to NRC, 'Degraded Voltage Protection at Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant," dated December 10, 2004, ML043500015. |
| | By Reference 1, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) informed Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M) of a proposed backfit in accordance with 10 CFR 50.109. The proposed backfit consists of modifying the design of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 such that automatic degraded voltage protection is not bypassed during normal operation. The NRC stated in Reference 1 that I&M may choose to implement the backfit or appeal it. |
| | I&M has chosen to implement the backfit. In Reference 1, the NRC stated that, if I&M chose to implement the backfit, implementation should be accomplished on a schedule negotiated with the NRC staff in accordance with NRC Management Directive (MD) 8.4, Paragraph (I1)(B)(9). MD 8.4, Paragraph (]I)(B)(9) states that scheduling criteria should include the importance of the backfit relative to other safety or security-related activities under way, such as planned construction or maintenance that will allow the facility to maintain the schedule of construction or continue operations. |
| | I&M is currently evaluating options for implementing the backfit. I&M expects that implementation of the backfit will require significant planning and expenditure of resources. I&M anticipates that fylt |
|
| |
|
| 1)Letter from C. Haney, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), to M. K. Nazar, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), 'Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 -Imposition of Facility-Specific Backfit Re: Degraded Voltage Protection System (TAC Nos. MC5735 and 5736)," dated November 9, 2005, ML050680057.
| | U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:6321 Page 2 up to two operating cycles will be needed for each unit to complete implementation of the backfit. I&M intends to meet with members of the NRC staff to discuss technical and schedular considerations, and establish a mutually acceptable date by which implementation of the backfit will be complete. |
| : 2) Letter from J. N. Jensen, I&M, to NRC, 'Degraded Voltage Protection at Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant," dated December 10, 2004, ML043500015.
| | As described in Section 3.0 of Attachment 1 to Reference 2, I&M considers the existing degraded voltage protection system design adequate to assure plant safety. Additionally, I&M concludes that acceptance of this backfit does not result in the units being in noncompliance with the associated technical specifications. However, I&M has enhanced the level of plant safety by changing plant operating procedures to include additional actions to be taken in response to a sustained degraded voltage condition. The procedure changes have been implemented and are expected to remain in effect until the backfit modifications are completed. |
| By Reference 1, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) informed Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M) of a proposed backfit in accordance with 10 CFR 50.109. The proposed backfit consists of modifying the design of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 such that automatic degraded voltage protection is not bypassed during normal operation.
| | This letter contains no new regulatory commitments. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Supervisor, at (269) 466-2649. |
| The NRC stated in Reference 1 that I&M may choose to implement the backfit or appeal it.I&M has chosen to implement the backfit. In Reference 1, the NRC stated that, if I&M chose to implement the backfit, implementation should be accomplished on a schedule negotiated with the NRC staff in accordance with NRC Management Directive (MD) 8.4, Paragraph (I1)(B)(9).
| | Sincerely, h N. Jensen Site Vice President JW/rdw C: J. L. Caldwell, NRC Region III K. D. Curry, Ft. Wayne AEP J. T. King, MPSC MDEQ - WHMD/RPMWS NRC Resident Inspector P. S. Tam, NRC Washington, DC}} |
| MD 8.4, Paragraph
| |
| (]I)(B)(9) states that scheduling criteria should include the importance of the backfit relative to other safety or security-related activities under way, such as planned construction or maintenance that will allow the facility to maintain the schedule of construction or continue operations.
| |
| I&M is currently evaluating options for implementing the backfit. I&M expects that implementation of the backfit will require significant planning and expenditure of resources.
| |
| I&M anticipates that fylt U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:6321 Page 2 up to two operating cycles will be needed for each unit to complete implementation of the backfit. I&M intends to meet with members of the NRC staff to discuss technical and schedular considerations, and establish a mutually acceptable date by which implementation of the backfit will be complete.As described in Section 3.0 of Attachment 1 to Reference 2, I&M considers the existing degraded voltage protection system design adequate to assure plant safety. Additionally, I&M concludes that acceptance of this backfit does not result in the units being in noncompliance with the associated technical specifications.
| |
| However, I&M has enhanced the level of plant safety by changing plant operating procedures to include additional actions to be taken in response to a sustained degraded voltage condition. | |
| The procedure changes have been implemented and are expected to remain in effect until the backfit modifications are completed. | |
| This letter contains no new regulatory commitments. | |
| Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Supervisor, at (269) 466-2649.Sincerely, h N. Jensen Site Vice President JW/rdw C: J. L. Caldwell, NRC Region III K. D. Curry, Ft. Wayne AEP J. T. King, MPSC MDEQ -WHMD/RPMWS NRC Resident Inspector P. S. Tam, NRC Washington, DC}} | |
Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0427300282004-09-27027 September 2004 9/27/04, Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant - Issuance of Amendments Full-Scope Implementation of Alternative Source Term (TAC Nos. MB5733, MB5734, MB5735, MC0156, MC0157 and MC0158) (TS-405) Project stage: Approval ML0506800572005-11-0909 November 2005 DC Cook Units 1 and 2, Imposition of Facility-Specific Backfit Degraded Voltage Protection System (TAC Nos. MC5735 and MC2736 Project stage: Other ML0605304052006-02-0808 February 2006 Implementation of Degraded Voltage Protection Backfit Project stage: Other 2005-11-09
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARAEP-NRC-2024-62, Unit 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2024-08-0808 August 2024 Unit 2 Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation - Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2024-47, Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report2024-07-30030 July 2024 Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report ML24183A0162024-07-25025 July 2024 Review of Reactor Vessel Material Surveillance Program Capsule W Technical Report ML24169A2142024-07-25025 July 2024 Issuance of Amendment No. 362 Regarding Change to Technical Specification 3.4.12, Low Temperature Overpressure Protection System IR 05000315/20240022024-07-24024 July 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2024002 and 05000316/2024002 ML24197A1262024-07-15015 July 2024 Unit 2 - Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating ML24191A0692024-07-0909 July 2024 Operator Licensing Examination Approval - Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, July 2024 AEP-NRC-2024-56, Unit 2, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask2024-07-0808 July 2024 Unit 2, Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation, Registration of Dry Spent Fuel Storage Cask AEP-NRC-2024-48, Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating2024-07-0202 July 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) for License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating ML24176A1012024-06-21021 June 2024 57143-EN 57143 - Paragon Energy Solutions - Update 1 (Final) - 10CFR Part 21 Final Notification: P21-05242024-FN, Rev. 0 AEP-NRC-2024-45, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring2024-06-13013 June 2024 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Post Accident Monitoring Neutron Flux Monitoring ML24163A0132024-06-12012 June 2024 Request for Information for the NRC Age-Related Degradation Inspection: Inspection Report 05000315/2024012 and 05000316/2024012 AEP-NRC-2024-23, Core Operating Limits Report2024-05-23023 May 2024 Core Operating Limits Report ML24141A2162024-05-20020 May 2024 —Information Request to Support the NRC Annual Baseline Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes Inspection AEP-NRC-2024-40, Unit 2 - Supplement to License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating2024-05-16016 May 2024 Unit 2 - Supplement to License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating AEP-NRC-2024-41, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report2024-05-15015 May 2024 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report AEP-NRC-2024-26, Transmittal of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Emergency Plan Revision 492024-05-14014 May 2024 Transmittal of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Emergency Plan Revision 49 AEP-NRC-2024-07, Unit 2 - Transmittal of Report of Changes to the Emergency Plan2024-05-14014 May 2024 Unit 2 - Transmittal of Report of Changes to the Emergency Plan IR 05000315/20244012024-05-14014 May 2024 – Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2024401 and 05000316/2024401 IR 05000315/20240012024-05-14014 May 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2024001 and 05000316/2024001 ML24115A2152024-05-0707 May 2024 LTR: CNP Non-Acceptance with Opportunity TS 3-8-1 AEP-NRC-2024-24, Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report2024-05-0707 May 2024 Form OAR-1, Owners Activity Report ML24116A0002024-05-0202 May 2024 – Regulatory Audit in Support of Review of the Application to Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors AEP-NRC-2024-35, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2024-04-30030 April 2024 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2024-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations AEP-NRC-2024-28, 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report2024-04-29029 April 2024 2023 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report AEP-NRC-2024-31, Annual Report of Individual Monitoring2024-04-24024 April 2024 Annual Report of Individual Monitoring AEP-NRC-2024-29, (CNP) Unit 2 - Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-072024-04-0303 April 2024 (CNP) Unit 2 - Request for Relief Related to American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code Case N-729-6 Supplemental Examination Requirements, ISIR-5-07 AEP-NRC-2024-02, Unit 2 License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating2024-04-0303 April 2024 Unit 2 License Amendment Request for One-Time Extension of Completion Time for Inoperable AC Source - Operating IR 05000315/20230042024-01-31031 January 2024 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2023004 and 05000316/2023004 ML24004A1582024-01-19019 January 2024 Exemption from Select Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73 (EPID L-2023-LLE-0039 (Security Notifications, Reports, and Recordkeeping and Suspicious Activity Reporting)) AEP-NRC-2024-01, Emergency Plan Revision 482024-01-0808 January 2024 Emergency Plan Revision 48 AEP-NRC-2023-56, Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor2023-12-20020 December 2023 Report Per Technical Specification 5.6.6 for Inoperability of Unit 1 Post Accident Monitoring Reactor Coolant (Loop 3 Cold Leg) Wide Range Temperature Recorder Thermal Sensor ML23352A3502023-12-19019 December 2023 Dc. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 Biennial Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection and Request for Information ML23338A2642023-12-0505 December 2023 Confirmation of Initial License Examination AEP-NRC-2023-45, Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation2023-11-16016 November 2023 Unit 2 - Schedular Exemption for Enhanced Weapons, Firearms, Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation ML23310A1152023-11-0606 November 2023 Notification of the NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information, Inspection Report 05000316/2024002 IR 05000315/20234042023-11-0606 November 2023 Cyber Security Inspection Report 05000315/2023404 and 05000316/2023404 IR 05000315/20234032023-09-19019 September 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2023403 and 05000316/2023403 IR 05000315/20230112023-08-31031 August 2023 Functional Engineering Inspection - Commercial Grade Dedication Report 05000315/2023011 and 05000316/2023011 ML23242A1832023-08-30030 August 2023 Notification of NRC Baseline Inspection and Request for Information; Inspection Report05000315/2023004 AEP-NRC-2023-40, Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes2023-08-29029 August 2023 Annual Report of Loss-of-Coolant Accident Evaluation Model Changes IR 05000315/20234022023-08-11011 August 2023 Security Baseline Inspection Report 05000315/2023402 and 05000316/2023402 AEP-NRC-2023-34, Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation2023-08-0202 August 2023 Supplement to Request for Approval of Change Regarding Neutron Flux Instrumentation IR 05000315/20230022023-07-24024 July 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000315/2023002 and 05000316/2023002 ML23178A2422023-06-28028 June 2023 Reassignment of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Chief in the Division of Operating Reactor Licensing for Plant Licensing Branch III IR 05000315/20230122023-06-22022 June 2023 Biennial Problem Identification and Resolution Inspection Report 05000315/2023012 and 05000316/2023012 IR 05000315/20235012023-06-21021 June 2023 Emergency Preparedness Biennial Exercise Inspection Report 05000315/2023501 and 05000316/2023501 AEP-NRC-2023-29, Core Operating Limits Report2023-06-19019 June 2023 Core Operating Limits Report ML23159A0192023-06-13013 June 2023 Information Meeting with a Question and Answer Session to Discuss NRC 2022 End-Of-Cycle Plant Performance Assessment of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 AEP-NRC-2023-32, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-1 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2023-06-0606 June 2023 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2023-1 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations 2024-08-08
[Table view] |
Text
0_
Indiana Michigan Power Company Nuclear Generation Group INDIANA One Cook Place MICHIGAN Bridgman, MI 49106 POWER aep.com February 8, 2006 AEP:NRC:6321 10 CFR 50.109 Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Docuament Control Desk Mail Stop O-P1-17 Washington., DC 20555-0001 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Implementation of Degracled Voltage Protection Backfit
References:
- 1) Letter from C. Haney, U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), to M. K. Nazar, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M), 'Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Imposition of Facility-Specific Backfit Re:
Degraded Voltage Protection System (TAC Nos. MC5735 and 5736)," dated November 9, 2005, ML050680057.
- 2) Letter from J. N. Jensen, I&M, to NRC, 'Degraded Voltage Protection at Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant," dated December 10, 2004, ML043500015.
By Reference 1, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) informed Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M) of a proposed backfit in accordance with 10 CFR 50.109. The proposed backfit consists of modifying the design of Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 such that automatic degraded voltage protection is not bypassed during normal operation. The NRC stated in Reference 1 that I&M may choose to implement the backfit or appeal it.
I&M has chosen to implement the backfit. In Reference 1, the NRC stated that, if I&M chose to implement the backfit, implementation should be accomplished on a schedule negotiated with the NRC staff in accordance with NRC Management Directive (MD) 8.4, Paragraph (I1)(B)(9). MD 8.4, Paragraph (]I)(B)(9) states that scheduling criteria should include the importance of the backfit relative to other safety or security-related activities under way, such as planned construction or maintenance that will allow the facility to maintain the schedule of construction or continue operations.
I&M is currently evaluating options for implementing the backfit. I&M expects that implementation of the backfit will require significant planning and expenditure of resources. I&M anticipates that fylt
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:6321 Page 2 up to two operating cycles will be needed for each unit to complete implementation of the backfit. I&M intends to meet with members of the NRC staff to discuss technical and schedular considerations, and establish a mutually acceptable date by which implementation of the backfit will be complete.
As described in Section 3.0 of Attachment 1 to Reference 2, I&M considers the existing degraded voltage protection system design adequate to assure plant safety. Additionally, I&M concludes that acceptance of this backfit does not result in the units being in noncompliance with the associated technical specifications. However, I&M has enhanced the level of plant safety by changing plant operating procedures to include additional actions to be taken in response to a sustained degraded voltage condition. The procedure changes have been implemented and are expected to remain in effect until the backfit modifications are completed.
This letter contains no new regulatory commitments. Should you have any questions, please contact Mr. Michael K. Scarpello, Regulatory Affairs Supervisor, at (269) 466-2649.
Sincerely, h N. Jensen Site Vice President JW/rdw C: J. L. Caldwell, NRC Region III K. D. Curry, Ft. Wayne AEP J. T. King, MPSC MDEQ - WHMD/RPMWS NRC Resident Inspector P. S. Tam, NRC Washington, DC