ML11265A139: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 26, 2011  
{{#Wiki_filter:September 26, 2011 The Honorable Nita M. Lowey United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515
 
The Honorable Nita M. Lowey United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515  


==Dear Congresswoman Lowey:==
==Dear Congresswoman Lowey:==


On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am writing in response to your letter of August 15, 2011, concerning Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3). This letter supplements the Secretary of the Commission's September 16 letter to you. In your letter, you stated that replacement power for IP2 and IP3 could be provided within a few years, rather than a 10-to-15 year period as had been previously assumed; the Governor of New York opposes the continued operation of IP2 and IP3; the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has rejected the facility's request for a water quality permit to allow continued operation of the facility; other New York State agencies have acted to facilitate the provision of replacement power for IP2 and IP3; and the NRC should consider population density and evacuation issues in reaching a license renewal decision for IP2 and IP3. Further, you urged the NRC to work with the State of New York, and to issue a renewed license to IP2 and IP3, if found to be qualified, for no more than a short term, such as five years.
On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am writing in response to your letter of August 15, 2011, concerning Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3). This letter supplements the Secretary of the Commissions September 16 letter to you. In your letter, you stated that replacement power for IP2 and IP3 could be provided within a few years, rather than a 10-to-15 year period as had been previously assumed; the Governor of New York opposes the continued operation of IP2 and IP3; the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has rejected the facilitys request for a water quality permit to allow continued operation of the facility; other New York State agencies have acted to facilitate the provision of replacement power for IP2 and IP3; and the NRC should consider population density and evacuation issues in reaching a license renewal decision for IP2 and IP3. Further, you urged the NRC to work with the State of New York, and to issue a renewed license to IP2 and IP3, if found to be qualified, for no more than a short term, such as five years.
As you know, the NRC's authority to regulate U.S. commercial nuclear power plants derives from the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Pursuant to that Act, the NRC is authorized to issue operating licenses, and to renew such licenses, upon finding that the issuance of such licenses is not inimical to public health and safety or the common defense and security, and that the license application satisfies applicable NRC regulations and requirements. The NRC's regulatory requirements governing the renewal of such licenses are set forth in 10 C.F.R.
As you know, the NRCs authority to regulate U.S. commercial nuclear power plants derives from the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Pursuant to that Act, the NRC is authorized to issue operating licenses, and to renew such licenses, upon finding that the issuance of such licenses is not inimical to public health and safety or the common defense and security, and that the license application satisfies applicable NRC regulations and requirements. The NRCs regulatory requirements governing the renewal of such licenses are set forth in 10 C.F.R.
Part 54 ("Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants"). Those regulations establish the scope of matters to be considered in reaching a decision on license renewal. Matters such as the availability of replacement power, actions or decisions on non-nuclear safety matters by state officials, population density, and evacuation planning are not included among the issues the NRC has determined to be relevant to license renewal under the regulations. Rather, issues such as replacement power availability and water quality permits are within the purview of New York State or other federal agencies, while population density and evacuation planning are addressed by the NRC on an ongoing basis as part of the NRC's oversight of the plants' existing operating licenses.
Part 54 (Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants). Those regulations establish the scope of matters to be considered in reaching a decision on license renewal. Matters such as the availability of replacement power, actions or decisions on non-nuclear safety matters by state officials, population density, and evacuation planning are not included among the issues the NRC has determined to be relevant to license renewal under the regulations. Rather, issues such as replacement power availability and water quality permits are within the purview of New York State or other federal agencies, while population density and evacuation planning are addressed by the NRC on an ongoing basis as part of the NRCs oversight of the plants existing operating licenses.
The NRC takes seriously its responsibilities for licensing and oversight of U.S. nuclear power plants, to assure that license renewal applicants satisfy all applicable regulatory requirements, and to assure that the plants continue to operate safely.
The NRC takes seriously its responsibilities for licensing and oversight of U.S. nuclear power plants, to assure that license renewal applicants satisfy all applicable regulatory requirements, and to assure that the plants continue to operate safely.
N. Lowey While it is too soon to know whether the NRC will issue renewed licenses for IP2 and IP3, I can assure you that any decision on license renewal will take into consideration all relevant matters, consistent with the NRC's statutory responsibilities. If you have any additional questions, please contact me or Ms. Rebecca Schmidt, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776.
Sincerely,  /RA by Martin J. Virgilio for/
R. W. Borchardt Executive Director    for Operations


ML11269A032 OFFICE OEDO OCA OGC NRR EDO NAME RRihm EDacus (via email) STurk (via email) BHolian (via email) R.W. Borchardt (MVirgilio for) DATE 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/19/11 9/20/11 9/26/11}}
N. Lowey                                    While it is too soon to know whether the NRC will issue renewed licenses for IP2 and IP3, I can assure you that any decision on license renewal will take into consideration all relevant matters, consistent with the NRCs statutory responsibilities. If you have any additional questions, please contact me or Ms. Rebecca Schmidt, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776.
Sincerely,
                                            /RA by Martin J. Virgilio for/
R. W. Borchardt Executive Director for Operations
 
ML11269A032 OFFICE         OEDO           OCA             OGC                 NRR               EDO NAME           RRihm         EDacus           STurk            BHolian        R.W. Borchardt (via email)     (via email)         (via email)       (MVirgilio for)
DATE           9/20/11       9/20/11         9/19/11             9/20/11           9/26/11}}

Latest revision as of 15:15, 12 November 2019

G20110686/LTR-11-0482/EDATS: SECY-2011-0514 - Ltr to Rep. Nita M. Lowey Fm R. W. Borchardt Regulation Identification Number (Rule) Flexibility on Relicensing Terms - Indian Point
ML11265A139
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/26/2011
From: Borchardt R
NRC/EDO
To: Lowey N
US HR (House of Representatives)
Rihm R
Shared Package
ML11269A032 List:
References
G20110686, LTR-11-0482, SECY-2011-0514, EDATS: SECY-2011-0514
Download: ML11265A139 (3)
v • d • e


Text

September 26, 2011 The Honorable Nita M. Lowey United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear Congresswoman Lowey:

On behalf of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), I am writing in response to your letter of August 15, 2011, concerning Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 (IP2 and IP3). This letter supplements the Secretary of the Commissions September 16 letter to you. In your letter, you stated that replacement power for IP2 and IP3 could be provided within a few years, rather than a 10-to-15 year period as had been previously assumed; the Governor of New York opposes the continued operation of IP2 and IP3; the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation has rejected the facilitys request for a water quality permit to allow continued operation of the facility; other New York State agencies have acted to facilitate the provision of replacement power for IP2 and IP3; and the NRC should consider population density and evacuation issues in reaching a license renewal decision for IP2 and IP3. Further, you urged the NRC to work with the State of New York, and to issue a renewed license to IP2 and IP3, if found to be qualified, for no more than a short term, such as five years.

As you know, the NRCs authority to regulate U.S. commercial nuclear power plants derives from the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Pursuant to that Act, the NRC is authorized to issue operating licenses, and to renew such licenses, upon finding that the issuance of such licenses is not inimical to public health and safety or the common defense and security, and that the license application satisfies applicable NRC regulations and requirements. The NRCs regulatory requirements governing the renewal of such licenses are set forth in 10 C.F.R. Part 54 (Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants). Those regulations establish the scope of matters to be considered in reaching a decision on license renewal. Matters such as the availability of replacement power, actions or decisions on non-nuclear safety matters by state officials, population density, and evacuation planning are not included among the issues the NRC has determined to be relevant to license renewal under the regulations. Rather, issues such as replacement power availability and water quality permits are within the purview of New York State or other federal agencies, while population density and evacuation planning are addressed by the NRC on an ongoing basis as part of the NRCs oversight of the plants existing operating licenses.

The NRC takes seriously its responsibilities for licensing and oversight of U.S. nuclear power plants, to assure that license renewal applicants satisfy all applicable regulatory requirements, and to assure that the plants continue to operate safely.

N. Lowey While it is too soon to know whether the NRC will issue renewed licenses for IP2 and IP3, I can assure you that any decision on license renewal will take into consideration all relevant matters, consistent with the NRCs statutory responsibilities. If you have any additional questions, please contact me or Ms. Rebecca Schmidt, Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs, at (301) 415-1776.

Sincerely,

/RA by Martin J. Virgilio for/

R. W. Borchardt Executive Director for Operations

ML11269A032 OFFICE OEDO OCA OGC NRR EDO NAME RRihm EDacus STurk BHolian R.W. Borchardt (via email) (via email) (via email) (MVirgilio for)

DATE 9/20/11 9/20/11 9/19/11 9/20/11 9/26/11

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML11265A139&oldid=2112097"