ML17341A806: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 01/13/1982 | | issue date = 01/13/1982 | ||
| title = Application for Amend to Licenses DPR-31 & DPR-41 Changing Tech Specs to Allow Higher Boron Concentration During Refueling | | title = Application for Amend to Licenses DPR-31 & DPR-41 Changing Tech Specs to Allow Higher Boron Concentration During Refueling | ||
| author name = | | author name = Uhrig R | ||
| author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. | | author affiliation = FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = Eisenhut D | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR) | | addressee affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION (NRR) | ||
| docket = 05000250, 05000251 | | docket = 05000250, 05000251 | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULlAITM( | {{#Wiki_filter:REGULlAITM( IVFORiHATION DiISTRIBUTXO KSTEiM'RIDS)'CCESS IONi NBR: 8291180508" DOC'ATE: 82/01/13 'VOLT'ARIZEO: NO DDCKE<T FAC>>IU:50 "250 TUrkey Poli nt> Pil ehti Uni t 3i F<1 oui dal Power a'nd Lli ght | ||
Filo'.i da<Pbyer L Liight Co..RECAP>>.NARE'ECKPiIEiVfl AFFZLli.ATiIOiVi EISENHUT.'i 0'G"..Dli v i s i on os>>LH censing SUB'JECfl': | ~ Cl 05000250 50 251. Turkey, Poli nt Pil 8'nti Uni t 4'i Fil ori da< Ptiper a'nd Lli ght | ||
Aoplii'cat i op>>fop afnend tot L'icenses DPR"34.8 DPR-41 changing Tech Specs'ol ail | ~ Cl 05000251. | ||
LlTR I ENCLl | AUTH'AiiEI AUTHOR AFFiILlI'ACTION UHRIGiR.Ef. Filo'.i da< Pbyer L Liight Co.. | ||
ELD NRR/D,'9F6 DEPT'08'DRAB>> | RECAP>>.NARE'ECKPiIEiVfl AFFZLli.ATiIOiVi EISENHUT.'i 0' G".. Dli v i s i on os>> LH censing SUB'JECfl': Aoplii'cat i op>> fop afnend tot L'icenses DPR"34. 8 DPR-41 changing Tech Specs'ol ail oy higher boron concen'tr a'ion during 1 | ||
re fua0ri ng.. | |||
ACRS iVRCl POR | liberatingSIZE"'+5 D'ISTR IBUTIONi CDDEl: A001S COPiIES'ECEIVED: LlTR I ENCLl T>>ITLE: Gener ail- Di stributi op>> forl af ter Issuahce of>> Lli cense NOTES: 4 (Ch~CP-4" 19~ | ||
LlTTR 35 ENCl.l 33 | R EC!IPiI ENiT~ COP>>IES RECAP>>I ENiTl COPIES IO CODEi/iV AMEI LITiTR ENCL>> IDi CODE/NANEl LA'TR EN C Ll ACiTIOiV: ORB 01 BCl 01>> 13 13 I>>VTERNAL(: ELD 1 0 I El 06 2 2 NRR/D,'9F6 DEPT'08'DRAB>> | ||
1>> 1 NRR/Dl.l DIR: 1 1 1>> 0 NRR/DSI/RASE 1 REG! i l 04', ii 1,, | |||
EXTERNALl: ACRS 09 10 10 LPOR 03 1 iVRCl POR 02: i. 1 NSI Cl 05i 1 1 NTIS 1>> 1 TOTALI NUBBER 'OF< COPiIES REOU'IRED'. LlTTR 35 ENCl.l 33 | |||
~ | |||
Turkey Point Units 3& | * I 1 | ||
A safety evaluation is attached to support our request The proposed amendment is described'below and shown on the accompanying Tech-ni:cal Specification pages bearing the date of this letter in the lower right hand corner.Pa e 3.10-2 The requirement for minimum boron concentration during refueling may be higher than 1950 ppm depend'ing on the core design.Pa e B3.10-1 The minimum refueling boron concentration is required to maintain at least 10$shutdown margin and depends on the core design.Enclosed please find a check for$4,400 in accordance with 10CFR 170.22.It has been determined that this represents a Class I and III amendment. | 0 | ||
The proposed amendment has been reviewed and approved by the Turkey Point Plant Nuclear Safety Committee and the Florida Power&Light Company Nuclear Review Board.Very truly yours, Robert E.Uhrig Vice President Advanced Systems&Technology 820ii80508 820ii3 REUiSKMi~c PDR ADOCK 05000250 P PDR!cc: Mr.J.P.O'Reilly, Region II Harold F.Reis, Esqui're | |||
This permits maintenance of the instrumentation. | ~)gll/ji | ||
Continuous monitoring of radiation levels and neutron flux provides immediate.indication of an unsafe conditi'on. | +ltr>AX FLORIOA POWER II .LIGHT COMPANY Januar 13~ 1982 L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l~ | ||
The residual'eat pump is used to maintain a uniform boron concentration. | Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing gg478~ | ||
A'oron concentration of 1950 ppm was sufficient to maintain the reactor subcri;tical by at least 1(gh,k/k in the cold condition with all rods inserted, and also maintained the core,subcritical with no control rods inserted, for the first core design The required boron concentration | 'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. .20555 AOXS~SR~ | ||
only one fuel assembly at a time.References (1')FSAR-Section 9.5 (2)FSAR Table 3.2.1-1 B3, 10-1 1-13-82 t l II}} | Dear Mr. Eisenhut IRAN Re: Turkey Point Units 3 & %F Nos. 50-250 and 504'ocket license Amendment 251'roposed Refuelin Boron Concentration In accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, Florida Power & Light Company submits herewith three signed originals and forty copies of a request to amend Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 & 41. | ||
This amendment is submitted to allow a higher boron concentration during refueling. A safety evaluation is attached to support our request The proposed amendment is described 'below and shown on the accompanying Tech-ni:cal Specification pages bearing the date of this letter in the lower right hand corner. | |||
Pa e 3.10-2 The requirement for minimum boron concentration during refueling may be higher than 1950 ppm depend'ing on the core design. | |||
Pa e B3.10-1 The minimum refueling boron concentration is required to maintain at least 10$ | |||
shutdown margin and depends on the core design. | |||
Enclosed please find a check for $ 4,400 in accordance with 10CFR 170.22. It has been determined that this represents a Class I and III amendment. | |||
The proposed amendment has been reviewed and approved by the Turkey Point Plant Nuclear Safety Committee and the Florida Power & Light Company Nuclear Review Board. | |||
Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President A/II Advanced Systems & Technology 820ii80508 820ii3 qA, REUiSKMi~c PDR ADOCK 05000250 P PDR ! | |||
cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esqui're PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE | |||
lf P | |||
~T | |||
'N fg t g,) IJ | |||
~+ | |||
~ t <<~II | |||
'h | |||
* b th | |||
B3;10 BASES FOR LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION, REFUELING Detailed instructions,, safety precautions and the design of the fuel handling equipment, incorporating buil't-in inter-locks and',safety features, provide assurance that no inci-dent could'ccur during the refueling operations that would result in a hazard to public health and safety- (1) 'hen-ever changes are not being made in core geometry one flux monitor is sufficient. This permits maintenance of the instrumentation. Continuous monitoring of radiation levels and neutron flux provides immediate .indication of an unsafe conditi'on. The residual'eat pump is used to maintain a uniform boron concentration. | |||
A'oron concentration of 1950 ppm was sufficient to maintain the reactor subcri;tical by at least 1(gh,k/k in the cold condition with all rods inserted, and also maintained the core,subcritical with no control rods inserted, for the first core design (2) The required boron concentration may increase depending on the subsequent core design. | |||
The control room operator will be able to inform the manipu-lator operator of any, impending unsafe condition detected from the control, board indicators during fuel movement. | |||
a | |||
,l | |||
'he cask crane interlocks prevent cask'handling above spent fuel. An excess weight. interlock is provided on the spent fuel bridge crane hoist to prevent movement of more, than one fuel assembly at a time. The spent fuel transfer mechanism can accommodate. only one fuel assembly at a time. | |||
References (1') FSAR - Section 9.5 (2) FSAR Table 3.2.1-1 B3, 10-1 1-13-82 | |||
t l | |||
II}} |
Latest revision as of 09:40, 22 October 2019
ML17341A806 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Turkey Point |
Issue date: | 01/13/1982 |
From: | Robert E. Uhrig FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
Shared Package | |
ML17341A807 | List: |
References | |
L-82-13, NUDOCS 8201180508 | |
Download: ML17341A806 (6) | |
Text
REGULlAITM( IVFORiHATION DiISTRIBUTXO KSTEiM'RIDS)'CCESS IONi NBR: 8291180508" DOC'ATE: 82/01/13 'VOLT'ARIZEO: NO DDCKE<T FAC>>IU:50 "250 TUrkey Poli nt> Pil ehti Uni t 3i F<1 oui dal Power a'nd Lli ght
~ Cl 05000250 50 251. Turkey, Poli nt Pil 8'nti Uni t 4'i Fil ori da< Ptiper a'nd Lli ght
~ Cl 05000251.
AUTH'AiiEI AUTHOR AFFiILlI'ACTION UHRIGiR.Ef. Filo'.i da< Pbyer L Liight Co..
RECAP>>.NARE'ECKPiIEiVfl AFFZLli.ATiIOiVi EISENHUT.'i 0' G".. Dli v i s i on os>> LH censing SUB'JECfl': Aoplii'cat i op>> fop afnend tot L'icenses DPR"34. 8 DPR-41 changing Tech Specs'ol ail oy higher boron concen'tr a'ion during 1
re fua0ri ng..
liberatingSIZE"'+5 D'ISTR IBUTIONi CDDEl: A001S COPiIES'ECEIVED: LlTR I ENCLl T>>ITLE: Gener ail- Di stributi op>> forl af ter Issuahce of>> Lli cense NOTES: 4 (Ch~CP-4" 19~
R EC!IPiI ENiT~ COP>>IES RECAP>>I ENiTl COPIES IO CODEi/iV AMEI LITiTR ENCL>> IDi CODE/NANEl LA'TR EN C Ll ACiTIOiV: ORB 01 BCl 01>> 13 13 I>>VTERNAL(: ELD 1 0 I El 06 2 2 NRR/D,'9F6 DEPT'08'DRAB>>
1>> 1 NRR/Dl.l DIR: 1 1 1>> 0 NRR/DSI/RASE 1 REG! i l 04', ii 1,,
EXTERNALl: ACRS 09 10 10 LPOR 03 1 iVRCl POR 02: i. 1 NSI Cl 05i 1 1 NTIS 1>> 1 TOTALI NUBBER 'OF< COPiIES REOU'IRED'. LlTTR 35 ENCl.l 33
~
- I 1
0
~)gll/ji
+ltr>AX FLORIOA POWER II .LIGHT COMPANY Januar 13~ 1982 L Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation l~
Attention: Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing gg478~
'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. .20555 AOXS~SR~
Dear Mr. Eisenhut IRAN Re: Turkey Point Units 3 & %F Nos. 50-250 and 504'ocket license Amendment 251'roposed Refuelin Boron Concentration In accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, Florida Power & Light Company submits herewith three signed originals and forty copies of a request to amend Appendix A of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-31 & 41.
This amendment is submitted to allow a higher boron concentration during refueling. A safety evaluation is attached to support our request The proposed amendment is described 'below and shown on the accompanying Tech-ni:cal Specification pages bearing the date of this letter in the lower right hand corner.
Pa e 3.10-2 The requirement for minimum boron concentration during refueling may be higher than 1950 ppm depend'ing on the core design.
Pa e B3.10-1 The minimum refueling boron concentration is required to maintain at least 10$
shutdown margin and depends on the core design.
Enclosed please find a check for $ 4,400 in accordance with 10CFR 170.22. It has been determined that this represents a Class I and III amendment.
The proposed amendment has been reviewed and approved by the Turkey Point Plant Nuclear Safety Committee and the Florida Power & Light Company Nuclear Review Board.
Very truly yours, Robert E. Uhrig Vice President A/II Advanced Systems & Technology 820ii80508 820ii3 qA, REUiSKMi~c PDR ADOCK 05000250 P PDR !
cc: Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Region II Harold F. Reis, Esqui're PEOPLE... SERVING PEOPLE
lf P
~T
'N fg t g,) IJ
~+
~ t <<~II
'h
- b th
B3;10 BASES FOR LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION, REFUELING Detailed instructions,, safety precautions and the design of the fuel handling equipment, incorporating buil't-in inter-locks and',safety features, provide assurance that no inci-dent could'ccur during the refueling operations that would result in a hazard to public health and safety- (1) 'hen-ever changes are not being made in core geometry one flux monitor is sufficient. This permits maintenance of the instrumentation. Continuous monitoring of radiation levels and neutron flux provides immediate .indication of an unsafe conditi'on. The residual'eat pump is used to maintain a uniform boron concentration.
A'oron concentration of 1950 ppm was sufficient to maintain the reactor subcri;tical by at least 1(gh,k/k in the cold condition with all rods inserted, and also maintained the core,subcritical with no control rods inserted, for the first core design (2) The required boron concentration may increase depending on the subsequent core design.
The control room operator will be able to inform the manipu-lator operator of any, impending unsafe condition detected from the control, board indicators during fuel movement.
a
,l
'he cask crane interlocks prevent cask'handling above spent fuel. An excess weight. interlock is provided on the spent fuel bridge crane hoist to prevent movement of more, than one fuel assembly at a time. The spent fuel transfer mechanism can accommodate. only one fuel assembly at a time.
References (1') FSAR - Section 9.5 (2) FSAR Table 3.2.1-1 B3, 10-1 1-13-82
t l
II