ML12088A220: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 3 | | page count = 3 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:Garmon, David From: Lehman, Bryce Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 3:50 PM To: Garmon, David | |||
==Subject:== | |||
FW: PREDECISIONAL | |||
-FIL Preliminary Draft Response for Comment reg. Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) Issue at Seabrook Attachments: | |||
Seabrook ASR Prelim DRAFT Response (.,<for Comment 12-20-1 1.docx David, Attached is George's preliminary response to Region l's TIA. Please note the draft/preliminary nature of the file.Thanks, Bryce From: Thomas, George IL Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:05 PM To: Sheikh, Abdul; Modes, Michael; Chaudhary, Suresh; Raymond, William; Graves, Herman; Pires, Jose; Lehman, Bryce Cc: Conte, Richard; Auluck, Rajender; Hogan, Rosemary; Murphy, Martin; Manoly, Kamal; Farzam, Farhad; Burritt, Arthur | |||
==Subject:== | |||
PREDECISIONAL | |||
-OFFICIAL USE ONLY : Preliminary Draft Response for Comment reg. Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) Issue at Seabrook Attached is a Preliminary Draft Response that I put together to the Request for Technical Assistance from Region 1 with regard to the ASR-degradation issue of concrete structures at Seabrook Station. The purpose of this email is to solicit internal brainstorming, input, and comment on the issue and the attached preliminary response. | |||
Please note that the attached preliminary document is NOT the NRR/DE position and has not been reviewed and concurred within NRR/DE. Further, we have not yet got a firm comprehensive Action Plan and Test Plan from the licensee, which is very important to taking an NRC position on the issue. Please provide your comments at the earliest but no later than COB January 20, 2012.Thanks.George Thomas Structural Engineer 21"1 NRR/DE/EMCB | |||
-301-415-6181 From: Hiland, Patrick Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:47 AM To: Miller, Chris Cc: Conte, Richard; Thomas, George | |||
==Subject:== | |||
FW: Briefing Material for Tomorrow's Call at 200pm on Seabrook ASR Importance: | |||
High Chris, my staff discussed the attached briefing notes with me last night. In particular, I was briefed on the TIA which George Thomas of my staff is working on, that has a due date of 12/29. Not sure what the expectations are, but it appears that answering the TIA with firm guidance is not achievable by 12/29. George has put together a number of specific criteria that could be used to compare with licensee's "plan" when delivered. | |||
I've advised George Thomas to send out his draft information as a brainstorm effort to solicit input from NRR/DLR, RES, and Region 1, I've been told that the NRC doesn't have any specific engineering/technical guidance available regarding ASR and that we are searching out info from other industries. | |||
Obviously, the licensee has the responsibility to evaluate under XVI and should Ihformation in this record was deleta (4% accordance with the Freedom of Inforratjwo/ | |||
Act, exemptions | |||
..i.A: .:L4/, -& /..... | |||
do the engineering work to defend their corrective action. Our staff will continue to search out current information, but we do not anticipate providing an accurate list of criteria by 12/29. The purpose of this email is info only.From: Conte, Richard P Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:30 PM To: Auluck, Rajender; Ayres, David; Bahadur, Sher; Burritt, Arthur; Chaudhary, Suresh; Chernoff, Harold; Clifford, James;Cline, Leonard;, Conte, Richard; Cruz, Holly; Delligatti, Mark; Evans, Michele; Ferrer, Nathaniel; Galloway, Melanie; Hiland, Patrick; Howe, Allen; Khanna, Meena; Lamb, John; Lehman, Bryce; Lund, Louise; Manoly, Kamal; Miller, Chris; Miller, Ed;Modes, Michael; Morey, Dennis; Murphy, Martin; Plasse, Richard; Raymond, William; Roberts, Darrell; Sakai, Stacie;Sheikh, Abdul; Thomas, George; Wilson, Peter. | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Briefing Material for Tomorrow's Call at 200pm on Seabrook ASR See attached agenda and talking points along with attachments for more details.2 EX 5 (21 pages),}} |
Revision as of 21:27, 29 July 2018
ML12088A220 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Seabrook |
Issue date: | 12/21/2011 |
From: | Bryce Lehman Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
To: | Garmon D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2012-0119 | |
Download: ML12088A220 (3) | |
Text
Garmon, David From: Lehman, Bryce Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 3:50 PM To: Garmon, David
Subject:
FW: PREDECISIONAL
-FIL Preliminary Draft Response for Comment reg. Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) Issue at Seabrook Attachments:
Seabrook ASR Prelim DRAFT Response (.,<for Comment 12-20-1 1.docx David, Attached is George's preliminary response to Region l's TIA. Please note the draft/preliminary nature of the file.Thanks, Bryce From: Thomas, George IL Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:05 PM To: Sheikh, Abdul; Modes, Michael; Chaudhary, Suresh; Raymond, William; Graves, Herman; Pires, Jose; Lehman, Bryce Cc: Conte, Richard; Auluck, Rajender; Hogan, Rosemary; Murphy, Martin; Manoly, Kamal; Farzam, Farhad; Burritt, Arthur
Subject:
PREDECISIONAL
-OFFICIAL USE ONLY : Preliminary Draft Response for Comment reg. Alkali-Silica Reaction (ASR) Issue at Seabrook Attached is a Preliminary Draft Response that I put together to the Request for Technical Assistance from Region 1 with regard to the ASR-degradation issue of concrete structures at Seabrook Station. The purpose of this email is to solicit internal brainstorming, input, and comment on the issue and the attached preliminary response.
Please note that the attached preliminary document is NOT the NRR/DE position and has not been reviewed and concurred within NRR/DE. Further, we have not yet got a firm comprehensive Action Plan and Test Plan from the licensee, which is very important to taking an NRC position on the issue. Please provide your comments at the earliest but no later than COB January 20, 2012.Thanks.George Thomas Structural Engineer 21"1 NRR/DE/EMCB
-301-415-6181 From: Hiland, Patrick Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 7:47 AM To: Miller, Chris Cc: Conte, Richard; Thomas, George
Subject:
FW: Briefing Material for Tomorrow's Call at 200pm on Seabrook ASR Importance:
High Chris, my staff discussed the attached briefing notes with me last night. In particular, I was briefed on the TIA which George Thomas of my staff is working on, that has a due date of 12/29. Not sure what the expectations are, but it appears that answering the TIA with firm guidance is not achievable by 12/29. George has put together a number of specific criteria that could be used to compare with licensee's "plan" when delivered.
I've advised George Thomas to send out his draft information as a brainstorm effort to solicit input from NRR/DLR, RES, and Region 1, I've been told that the NRC doesn't have any specific engineering/technical guidance available regarding ASR and that we are searching out info from other industries.
Obviously, the licensee has the responsibility to evaluate under XVI and should Ihformation in this record was deleta (4% accordance with the Freedom of Inforratjwo/
Act, exemptions
..i.A: .:L4/, -& /.....
do the engineering work to defend their corrective action. Our staff will continue to search out current information, but we do not anticipate providing an accurate list of criteria by 12/29. The purpose of this email is info only.From: Conte, Richard P Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:30 PM To: Auluck, Rajender; Ayres, David; Bahadur, Sher; Burritt, Arthur; Chaudhary, Suresh; Chernoff, Harold; Clifford, James;Cline, Leonard;, Conte, Richard; Cruz, Holly; Delligatti, Mark; Evans, Michele; Ferrer, Nathaniel; Galloway, Melanie; Hiland, Patrick; Howe, Allen; Khanna, Meena; Lamb, John; Lehman, Bryce; Lund, Louise; Manoly, Kamal; Miller, Chris; Miller, Ed;Modes, Michael; Morey, Dennis; Murphy, Martin; Plasse, Richard; Raymond, William; Roberts, Darrell; Sakai, Stacie;Sheikh, Abdul; Thomas, George; Wilson, Peter.
Subject:
Briefing Material for Tomorrow's Call at 200pm on Seabrook ASR See attached agenda and talking points along with attachments for more details.2 EX 5 (21 pages),