|
|
| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM(RIDS)ACCESSIOH NBR:9011060067 DOC.DATE: | | {{#Wiki_filter:REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (RIDS)ACCESSIOH NBR:9011060067 DOC.DATE: 90/10/12 NOTARIZED: |
| 90/10/12NOTARIZED: | | NO DOCKET FACIL:VO-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C. |
| NODOCKETFACIL:VO-244 RobertEmmetGinnaNuclearPlant,Unit1,Rochester G05000244AUTH.NAME AUTHORAFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.
| | Rochester Gas a Electric Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Office of the Secretary of the Commission |
| Rochester GasaElectricCorp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION OfficeoftheSecretary oftheCommission | |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| Commentsupporting proposedrules10CFR2,50 654renuclearpowerplantlicenserenewal.DISTRIBUTION CODE:DSlODCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:SECY/DSBDist:PublicCommentonProposedRule(PR)-10CFR NOTES:License Expdateinaccordance with10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
| | Comment supporting proposed rules 10CFR2,50 6 54 re nuclear power plant license renewal.DISTRIBUTION CODE: DSlOD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: SECY/DSB Dist: Public Comment on Proposed Rule (PR)-10CFR NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72). |
| 05000244RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME INTERNAL:
| | 05000244 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME INTERNAL: ADM/FIPS/RPB OGC/DR 15-B-18 COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NMSS/IMOB OGC/SAIP15-B-18 RES DIR COPIES LTTR ENCL EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 02 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 7 ENCL II DDDtt UMBER PRDPDonD RULE N A~i 29rs r,"-r', eo rr st re i'J(,K iL0 USNi',0 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.K e~+~e~~~rts 14649-0001 |
| ADM/FIPS/RPB OGC/DR15-B-18COPIESLTTRENCLRECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME NMSS/IMOB OGC/SAIP15-B-18 RESDIRCOPIESLTTRENCLEXTERNAL: | | ' 90 OCT 23 P2:56~ LEONE ROBERT C. MECREDY Vice President@inn@ Nuctear Production AREA CODE 716 546. 2700 October 12, 1990."3C: 0PSEt"iitlAtt~n isOGK;". ltiu A St- fr Vlf;f'3i<ANC4 |
| NRCPDR02TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
| |
| LTTR7ENCL II DDDttUMBERPRDPDonDRULENA~i29rsr,"-r',eorrstrei'J(,KiL0USNi',089EASTAVENUE,ROCHESTER N.Ke~+~e~~~rts14649-0001
| |
| '90OCT23P2:56~LEONEROBERTC.MECREDYVicePresident | |
| @inn@NuctearProduction AREACODE716546.2700October12,1990."3C: | |
| 0PSEt"iitlAtt~n isOGK;". ltiuASt- frVlf;f'3i<ANC4 | |
| *ufrrrrrrrfrtlere Prprr(r,irrffr | | *ufrrrrrrrfrtlere Prprr(r,irrffr |
| '\ROCHESTER GASANDELECTRICCORPORATION | | '\ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION |
| ~MrSamuelJ.ChilkSecretary oftheCommission U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555Attention: | | ~Mr Samuel J.Chilk Secretary of the Commission U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 Attention: |
| Docketing andServiceBranch | | Docketing and Service Branch |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| NoticeofProposedRulemaking:
| | Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: |
| NuclearPowerPlantLicenseRenewal55Fed.Re.29043(Jul171990)
| | Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal 55 Fed.Re.29 043 (Jul 17 1990) |
|
| |
|
| ==DearMr.Chilk:== | | ==Dear Mr.Chilk:== |
| Inaccordance withtheabove-referenced NoticeofProposedRulemaking (theNotice),theRochester GasandElectricCorporation herebysubmitsthefollowing commentsand,aswell,fullyendorsestheNUMARCcommentsbeingsubmitted onthismatter.Weappreciate thisopportunity toexpressourviewsonthepromulgation ofaregulation togoverntherenewalofnuclearpowerplantlicenses.
| | In accordance with the above-referenced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the Notice), the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation hereby submits the following comments and, as well, fully endorses the NUMARC comments being submitted on this matter.We appreciate this opportunity to express our views on the promulgation of a regulation to govern the renewal of nuclear power plant licenses.~-We:,generally support the proposed regulation and urge the NRC to promulgate it with the modifications proposed in the NUMARC comment letter.In particular, we support the use of the current licensing basis (CLB)for a nuclear power plant to renew its license;we also support the applicability of the backfitting rule to license renewals.However, we share the concerns expressed in the NUMARC submittal regarding the definition of current licensing basis and whether an application for a renewed license should require an Integrated Plant Assessment (IPA)on the scale that is presently contemplated. |
| ~-We:,generally supporttheproposedregulation andurgetheNRCtopromulgate itwiththemodifications proposedintheNUMARCcommentletter.Inparticular, wesupporttheuseofthecurrentlicensing basis(CLB)foranuclearpowerplanttorenewitslicense;wealsosupporttheapplicability ofthebackfitting ruletolicenserenewals. | | The proposed CLB definition appears to freeze the CLB during the pendency of license renewal applications before the NRC.CLBs continuously change over time to accommodate changing safety information and regulations. |
| However,wesharetheconcernsexpressed intheNUMARCsubmittal regarding thedefinition ofcurrentlicensing basisandwhetheranapplication forarenewedlicenseshouldrequireanIntegrated PlantAssessment (IPA)onthescalethatispresently contemplated. | | Such a moratorium could cause unwarranted shutdowns and discourage utilities from the license renewal option.90ii060067 90iOi2 PDR PR 2 55FR29043 PDR |
| TheproposedCLBdefinition appearstofreezetheCLBduringthependencyoflicenserenewalapplications beforetheNRC.CLBscontinuously changeovertimetoaccommodate changingsafetyinformation andregulations.
| |
| Suchamoratorium couldcauseunwarranted shutdowns anddiscourage utilities fromthelicenserenewaloption.90ii060067 90iOi2PDRPR255FR29043 PDR
| |
|
| |
|
| TheIPAcontained inSection5.4.2.1(a) oftheproposedrulerequiresage-related degradation ofthefacility's systems,structures, andcomponents (SSCs)tobeidentified, evaluated, andaccounted forasneededtoassurethefacility's licensing basiswillbemaintained throughout therenewedterm.WeshareNUMARC'sconcernregarding thescopeofSSCstobeevaluated.
| | The IPA contained in Section 5.4.2.1(a) of the proposed rule requires age-related degradation of the facility's systems, structures, and components (SSCs)to be identified, evaluated, and accounted for as needed to assure the facility's licensing basis will be maintained throughout the renewed term.We share NUMARC's concern regarding the scope of SSCs to be evaluated. |
| Wefeeltheymaybeinterpreted toobroadlyandthedepthofevaluations tobeperformed oncomponents makingupsystemsismoreextensive thannecessary tosupportthefindingthatagingisbeingmanagedduringtherenewalterm.Webelievethisissuetobeimportant tothenationandcongratulate theNRConthediligence inthedevelopment ofthisrulemaking.
| | We feel they may be interpreted too broadly and the depth of evaluations to be performed on components making up systems is more extensive than necessary to support the finding that aging is being managed during the renewal term.We believe this issue to be important to the nation and congratulate the NRC on the diligence in the development of this rulemaking. |
| Verytrulyyours,RobertC.MecredyBASi086xc:Mr.AllenR.Johnson(MailStop14D1)ProjectDirectorate I-3Washington, D.C.20555U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission RegionI475"A1lendale RoadKingofPrussia,PA19406GinnaSeniorResidentInspector
| | Very truly yours, Robert C.Mecredy BASi086 xc: Mr.Allen R.Johnson (Mail Stop 14D1)Project Directorate I-3 Washington, D.C.20555 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475" A1lendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector |
|
| |
|
| (goREGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM':DOCKETNBR:p5p-244ReGinna1DOCDATE:781006RECIPIENT: | | (go REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM': DOCKET NBR: p5p-244 Re Ginna 1 DOC DATE: 781006 RECIPIENT: |
| ACCESSION NBR-7810170213 ORIGINATOR: | | ACCESSION NBR-7810170213 ORIGINATOR: |
| COPIESRECEIVED:
| | COPIES RECEIVED: COMPANY NAME:*q LTR.1.ENCL |
| COMPANYNAME:*qLTR.1.ENCL
| |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| 'IZE:1+5ForwardsMonthl0erRetforSe't,'978.DISTRIBUTIONCODE,!ADO'*DISTRIBUTION TITLEtANNU4LiSEHI4NNUAL8MONTHLYOPERATING RPTS(OLSTAGE)NAHFSRNRCPARIIlEMIPCHAhIAUERDIRECTORDDRADFORSYSLPRODENGINEERING BRREACThRSAFETYHRPLANTSYSTEHSBREE8COREPERFORHANCE BREFFLUENTTRE4TSYSLPDRNATLIABTERANSICBROOKHAVEN ACRSTOTALNUHBEROFCOPENCL24t/6ENCLw/ENCLW/ENCL8/2,FNCIw/2ENCL'W/ENCLw/ENCLIv/ENCLw/ENCL,w/ENCLw/ENCLw/ENCLW/ENCLW/ENCLw/ENCLw/ENCLw/ENCLw/ENCL'/ENCI. | | 'IZE: 1+5 Forwards Monthl 0 er Re t for Se't,'978.DISTRI BUT ION CODE,!ADO'*DISTRIBUTION TITLE t ANNU4Li SEHI 4NNUAL 8 MONTHLY OPERATING RPTS (OL STAGE)NAHF SR NRC PAR I IlE MIPC HAhIAUER DIRECTOR DDR AD FOR SYS L PROD ENGINEERING BR REACThR SAFETY HR PLANT SYSTEHS BR EE8 CORE PERFORHANCE BR EFFLUENT TRE4T SYS LPDR NATL I AB TERA NSIC BROOKHAVEN ACRS TOTAL NUHBER OF COP ENCL2 4t/6 ENCL w/ENCL W/ENCL 8/2, FNCI w/2 ENCL'W/ENCL w/ENCL Iv/ENCL w/ENCL, w/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL W/ENCL W/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL'/ENCI. |
| '4/15'NCL IESREQUIREDiLTRENCI.FORACTIONORB52BC)~~)NOTES:Oggo$9781~*~r~)'~p'~g)r~,:)gr.~~~",aC),g~r.r~):DA-~tA~)lt)tJ~ | | '4/15'NCL I ES REQUIRED i LTR ENCI.FOR ACTION ORB52 BC)~~)NOTES: Og go$978 1~*~r~)'~p'~g)r~,:)g r.~~~",a C), g~r.r~):DA-~t A~)l t)tJ~ |
| ~wIt ROCHESTER P(P'pl'latEj,'llklCGASANDELECTRICCORPORATION | | ~w It ROCHESTER P(P'pl'lat E j,'llklC GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION |
| ~89EASTAVENUE,ROCHESTER, N.Y.14649TCLCPHONC ARCACOOC710546.2700GinnaStationOctober6,1978Director, OfficeofManagement Information andProgramControlU.S.NUCLEARREGULATORY GNMISSION Washington, D.C.20555 | | ~89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y.14649 TCLCPHONC ARCA COOC 710 546.2700 Ginna Station October 6, 1978 Director, Office of Management Information and Program Control U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY GNMISSION Washington, D.C.20555 |
|
| |
|
| ==Subject:== | | ==Subject:== |
| monthlyReportforSeptember, 1978Operating StatusInformation R.E.GinnaNuclearPowerPlantUnitNo.1DocketNo.50-244
| | monthly Report for September, 1978 Operating Status Information R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Unit No.1 Docket No.50-244 |
|
| |
|
| ==DearSir:== | | ==Dear Sir:== |
| PursuanttoourTechnical Specification 6.9.1,attachedherewithisthemonthlyoperating statusreportforGinnaStationforthemonthofSeptember, 1978.Verytrulyyours,BruceSnowSuperintendent Attachments 7gIoreo2-l3 1CI}}
| | Pursuant to our Technical Specification 6.9.1, attached herewith is the monthly operating status report for Ginna Station for the month of September, 1978.Very truly yours, Bruce Snow Superintendent Attachments 7 g I ore o2-l3 1 CI}} |
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal| ML17262A211 |
| Person / Time |
|---|
| Site: |
Ginna  |
|---|
| Issue date: |
10/12/1990 |
|---|
| From: |
MECREDY R C
ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
|---|
| To: |
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
|---|
| References |
|---|
| FRN-55FR29043, FRN-56FR64943, RULE-PR-2, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-54 55FR29043-00101, 55FR29043-101, AD04-2-154, AD4-2, AD4-2-154, NUDOCS 9011060067 |
| Download: ML17262A211 (10) |
|
Similar Documents at Ginna |
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20198Q4261998-12-14014 December 1998
Order Approving Application Re Restructuring of Rg&E Corp by Establishment of Holding Company Affecting License DPR-18, Ginna NPP
ML17265A3931998-07-31031 July 1998
Request for Consent to Corporate Reorganization.Rg&E Is Restructuring to Adopt Holding Company Form of Corporate Organization as Authorized by New York State PSC
ML20202D2301997-11-24024 November 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed Change to 10CFR50.55a(h) to Incorporate Requirements of IEEE Std 603-1991,effective 980101
ML17309A6161997-06-19019 June 1997
Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems.
ML17263A9531995-02-28028 February 1995
Comments on Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20 Re Reduction in Seismic Hazard to Majority of Us NPP
ML20077M8071995-01-0303 January 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20059F6811993-12-28028 December 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Clear Definition of Commerical Grade Items
ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML17309A4711992-01-29029 January 1992
Comments on Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73.
ML17262A2311990-10-24024 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS
ML17262A2111990-10-12012 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal
ML20245K8781989-04-25025 April 1989
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Urges NRC to Consider Allowing Sufficient Time to Assess Impact of Current Maint Upgrade Efforts at Plant
ML20235V6641989-03-0101 March 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Proposed Rule May Be Detrimental to Safety by Discouraging Potentially Superior Maint Practices
ML20206M7861988-11-21021 November 1988
Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Re Substance Abuse.Urges Commission to Adopt Suggested Specific Changes Indicated by NUMARC Comments
ML20196B3431988-06-20020 June 1988
Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings for 90 Days & Order Thereon.* Stay of Proceedings,Including Time to File Suppl to Petition for Leave to Intervene Requested.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20154H4571988-03-30030 March 1988
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Alternative Method for Leakage Rate Testing.Suggests That Rulemaking Should Simply Establish Acceptability of Mass Point Method & Allow Analysis of Data to Determine Length of Testing
IR 05000244/19860161986-11-12012 November 1986
Board Exhibit B-26,consisting of 861023 Insp Rept 50-244/86-16 & 861103 Forwarding Ltr
ML20094C2341984-08-0303 August 1984
Motion to Terminate Proceeding Based on ML Slade 840724 Withdrawal of Outstanding Contentions.No Contentions Remain to Be Heard or Decided.Proceeding Should Be Terminated. Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20090H6421984-07-24024 July 1984
Withdrawal of Contentions by Intervenor.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20093D5771984-07-13013 July 1984
Interrogatories Propounded to Intervenor MR Slade Re Contentions A,E & K.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20085H7221983-09-0909 September 1983
Response to ASLB 830819 Order Re Mi Slade 830715 Status Rept.All Regulatory Correspondence Provided to Slade or Available in Pdr.Proceeding Need Not Be Renoticed.No Basis Exists for Intervenor Reimbursement.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20076M3041983-07-15015 July 1983
Status Rept as of 830715.Util Has No Further Issuances.Nrc Has Two Issuances Expected by 830901.Author Expects to File Revised/Addl Contentions.Prehearing Conference Unnecessary. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence
ML20076L6821983-07-15015 July 1983
Memorandum of Law Supporting Licensee Position Re Need to Renotice Opportunity to Intervene.Aslb Should Not Order Renotice,Since Neither Law Nor Policy Counsel Favor Renotice.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20076L6731983-07-15015 July 1983
Response to ASLB 830615 Order,Recommending That Period of Discovery Not Commence Until All Future Issuances Re Integrated Plant Safety Assessment Rept (NUREG-0821) Available
ML20073P9891983-04-25025 April 1983
Request to Amend Svc List.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20071K7711982-07-30030 July 1982
Response to ASLB 820708 Order Re Status of Hearing. Discussion of Matters Re Discovery,Prehearing Conferences & Hearings Are Premature & Should Be Postponed Pending Issuance of Documents.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20055B1041982-07-16016 July 1982
Order Extending Time Until 820721 for Commission to Act to Review 820522 Director'S Decision
ML20054M7721982-07-0909 July 1982
Order Extending Time Until 820716 for Commission to Act to Review 820522 Director'S Decision
ML20054M1921982-07-0808 July 1982
Order Directing Parties to Confer Re Further Proceedings & Directing Each Party Submit Status Rept to ASLB by 820731 on Listed Matters
ML20054L2981982-07-0202 July 1982
Order Extending Time Until 820709 for Commission to Act to Review 820523 Director'S Decision
ML20054G6401982-06-18018 June 1982
Transcript of 820618 Special Investigative Proceeding in White Plains,Ny.Pp 1,126-1,253
ML20054E6561982-06-0909 June 1982
Order Extending Time Until 820702 for Commission to Act to Review 820522 Director'S Decision
ML17258A6371982-03-11011 March 1982
Petition for Order to Show Cause Why OL Should Not Be Suspended or Why Permission to Restart Reactor Should Not Be Withheld.Affidavit,Factual Basis for Petition & Excerpt of Weekly Info Rept for Wk Ending 820212 Encl
ML17250A3281980-06-0202 June 1980
Status Rept in Response to ASLB 800429 Order.Recommends Schedule for Findings,Safety Evaluation Suppl,Discovery & Further Prehearing Conferences.Recommends Determination of SEP Progress in One Yr
ML17250A3211980-05-30030 May 1980
Status Rept by Ny State Energy Ofc in Reponse to ASLB 800429 Order.Recommends That Parties Be Permitted to Identify Addl Contentions & That Prehearing Conference Be Held to Discuss Issues.W/Notice of Appearance & Certificate of Svc Encl
ML17249A3491979-12-10010 December 1979
Stipulation Terminating Proceeding as to Rochester Committee for Scientific Info,Inc.Rcsi Agrees That Applicant Has Fulfilled Paragraphs 1 & 4 Requirements of 740312 Stipulation.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML17249A2521979-10-31031 October 1979
Notice of Withdrawal of ED Doane,Ae Upton & Hm Babcock as Counsel for Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML17249A2531979-10-31031 October 1979
Notice of Appearance on Behalf of Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.Certificate of Svc Encl
ML20079F4371973-01-0505 January 1973
Petition of State of Ny for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing
1998-07-31
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20202D2301997-11-24024 November 1997
Comment Opposing Proposed Change to 10CFR50.55a(h) to Incorporate Requirements of IEEE Std 603-1991,effective 980101
ML17309A6161997-06-19019 June 1997
Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,Suppl 1, Control Rod Insertion Problems.
ML17263A9531995-02-28028 February 1995
Comments on Proposed Suppl 5 to GL 88-20 Re Reduction in Seismic Hazard to Majority of Us NPP
ML20077M8071995-01-0303 January 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & Low- Power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML20059F6811993-12-28028 December 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Clear Definition of Commerical Grade Items
ML20091Q8661992-01-31031 January 1992
Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1022,Rev 1, Event Reporting Sys,10CFR50.72 & 50.73,Clarification of NRC Sys & Guidelines for Reporting
ML17309A4711992-01-29029 January 1992
Comments on Draft Rev 1 to NUREG-1022, Event Reporting Sys, 10CFR50.72 & 50.73.
ML17262A2311990-10-24024 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR51 Re Renewal of Nuclear Plant OLs & NRC Intent to Prepare Generic EIS
ML17262A2111990-10-12012 October 1990
Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR2,50 & 54 Re Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal
ML20245K8781989-04-25025 April 1989
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Urges NRC to Consider Allowing Sufficient Time to Assess Impact of Current Maint Upgrade Efforts at Plant
ML20235V6641989-03-0101 March 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. Proposed Rule May Be Detrimental to Safety by Discouraging Potentially Superior Maint Practices
ML20206M7861988-11-21021 November 1988
Comments Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Program Re Substance Abuse.Urges Commission to Adopt Suggested Specific Changes Indicated by NUMARC Comments
ML20154H4571988-03-30030 March 1988
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Alternative Method for Leakage Rate Testing.Suggests That Rulemaking Should Simply Establish Acceptability of Mass Point Method & Allow Analysis of Data to Determine Length of Testing
1997-06-19
[Table view] |
Text
REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM (RIDS)ACCESSIOH NBR:9011060067 DOC.DATE: 90/10/12 NOTARIZED:
NO DOCKET FACIL:VO-244 Robert Emmet Ginna Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, Rochester G 05000244 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION MECREDY,R.C.
Rochester Gas a Electric Corp.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Office of the Secretary of the Commission
SUBJECT:
Comment supporting proposed rules 10CFR2,50 6 54 re nuclear power plant license renewal.DISTRIBUTION CODE: DSlOD COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: SECY/DSB Dist: Public Comment on Proposed Rule (PR)-10CFR NOTES:License Exp date in accordance with 10CFR2,2.109(9/19/72).
05000244 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME INTERNAL: ADM/FIPS/RPB OGC/DR 15-B-18 COPIES LTTR ENCL RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NMSS/IMOB OGC/SAIP15-B-18 RES DIR COPIES LTTR ENCL EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 02 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 7 ENCL II DDDtt UMBER PRDPDonD RULE N A~i 29rs r,"-r', eo rr st re i'J(,K iL0 USNi',0 89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER N.K e~+~e~~~rts 14649-0001
'90 OCT 23 P2:56~LEONE ROBERT C.MECREDY Vice President@inn@Nuctear Production AREA CODE 716 546.2700 October 12, 1990."3C: 0PSEt"iitlAtt~n isOGK;".ltiu A St-fr Vlf;f'3i<ANC4
- ufrrrrrrrfrtlere Prprr(r,irrffr
'\ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
~Mr Samuel J.Chilk Secretary of the Commission U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555 Attention:
Docketing and Service Branch
SUBJECT:
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking:
Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal 55 Fed.Re.29 043 (Jul 17 1990)
Dear Mr.Chilk:
In accordance with the above-referenced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the Notice), the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation hereby submits the following comments and, as well, fully endorses the NUMARC comments being submitted on this matter.We appreciate this opportunity to express our views on the promulgation of a regulation to govern the renewal of nuclear power plant licenses.~-We:,generally support the proposed regulation and urge the NRC to promulgate it with the modifications proposed in the NUMARC comment letter.In particular, we support the use of the current licensing basis (CLB)for a nuclear power plant to renew its license;we also support the applicability of the backfitting rule to license renewals.However, we share the concerns expressed in the NUMARC submittal regarding the definition of current licensing basis and whether an application for a renewed license should require an Integrated Plant Assessment (IPA)on the scale that is presently contemplated.
The proposed CLB definition appears to freeze the CLB during the pendency of license renewal applications before the NRC.CLBs continuously change over time to accommodate changing safety information and regulations.
Such a moratorium could cause unwarranted shutdowns and discourage utilities from the license renewal option.90ii060067 90iOi2 PDR PR 2 55FR29043 PDR
The IPA contained in Section 5.4.2.1(a) of the proposed rule requires age-related degradation of the facility's systems, structures, and components (SSCs)to be identified, evaluated, and accounted for as needed to assure the facility's licensing basis will be maintained throughout the renewed term.We share NUMARC's concern regarding the scope of SSCs to be evaluated.
We feel they may be interpreted too broadly and the depth of evaluations to be performed on components making up systems is more extensive than necessary to support the finding that aging is being managed during the renewal term.We believe this issue to be important to the nation and congratulate the NRC on the diligence in the development of this rulemaking.
Very truly yours, Robert C.Mecredy BASi086 xc: Mr.Allen R.Johnson (Mail Stop 14D1)Project Directorate I-3 Washington, D.C.20555 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region I 475" A1lendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Ginna Senior Resident Inspector
(go REGULATOR NFORMATION DISTRIBUTION TEM': DOCKET NBR: p5p-244 Re Ginna 1 DOC DATE: 781006 RECIPIENT:
ACCESSION NBR-7810170213 ORIGINATOR:
COPIES RECEIVED: COMPANY NAME:*q LTR.1.ENCL
SUBJECT:
'IZE: 1+5 Forwards Monthl 0 er Re t for Se't,'978.DISTRI BUT ION CODE,!ADO'*DISTRIBUTION TITLE t ANNU4Li SEHI 4NNUAL 8 MONTHLY OPERATING RPTS (OL STAGE)NAHF SR NRC PAR I IlE MIPC HAhIAUER DIRECTOR DDR AD FOR SYS L PROD ENGINEERING BR REACThR SAFETY HR PLANT SYSTEHS BR EE8 CORE PERFORHANCE BR EFFLUENT TRE4T SYS LPDR NATL I AB TERA NSIC BROOKHAVEN ACRS TOTAL NUHBER OF COP ENCL2 4t/6 ENCL w/ENCL W/ENCL 8/2, FNCI w/2 ENCL'W/ENCL w/ENCL Iv/ENCL w/ENCL, w/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL W/ENCL W/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL w/ENCL'/ENCI.
'4/15'NCL I ES REQUIRED i LTR ENCI.FOR ACTION ORB52 BC)~~)NOTES: Og go$978 1~*~r~)'~p'~g)r~,:)g r.~~~",a C), g~r.r~):DA-~t A~)l t)tJ~
~w It ROCHESTER P(P'pl'lat E j,'llklC GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION
~89 EAST AVENUE, ROCHESTER, N.Y.14649 TCLCPHONC ARCA COOC 710 546.2700 Ginna Station October 6, 1978 Director, Office of Management Information and Program Control U.S.NUCLEAR REGULATORY GNMISSION Washington, D.C.20555
Subject:
monthly Report for September, 1978 Operating Status Information R.E.Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Unit No.1 Docket No.50-244
Dear Sir:
Pursuant to our Technical Specification 6.9.1, attached herewith is the monthly operating status report for Ginna Station for the month of September, 1978.Very truly yours, Bruce Snow Superintendent Attachments 7 g I ore o2-l3 1 CI