ML18016B077: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Environmental Panel)*January 23, 2018 | {{#Wiki_filter:Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Environmental Panel)*January 23, 2018 2 Panelists*Benjamin Beasley | ||
*Benjamin Beasley | -Chief , Environmental Review and NEPA Branch | ||
-Chief, Environmental Review and NEPA Branch | |||
,NRR*Nancy Martinez | ,NRR*Nancy Martinez | ||
-Physical Scientist | -Physical Scientist | ||
,NRR*Michelle Moser | ,NRR*Michelle Moser | ||
-Biologist | -Biologist ,NRR*David Drucker | ||
,NRR*David Drucker | |||
-Senior Project Manager | -Senior Project Manager | ||
, | ,NRR 2 Environmental Review*National Environmental PolicyAct*Environmental reviewprocess-10 CFR Part 51-Interim StaffGuidanceAugmenting NUREG-1537 for Licensing Radioisotope Production Facilities and Aqueous Homogenous Reactors 3 Scope of the Review: Proposed Action and Connected ActionsActions are connected if they: | ||
-Automatically trigger other actions that may require environmental impact statements; or | -Automatically trigger other actions that may require environmental impact statements; or | ||
-Cannot or will not proceed unless other actions are taken previously or simultaneously; or | -Cannot or will not proceed unless other actions are taken previously or simultaneously; or | ||
| Line 33: | Line 31: | ||
*Construction, operations, and decommissioning related to target fabrication | *Construction, operations, and decommissioning related to target fabrication | ||
*Transportation of targets to/from research reactors and irradiation of targets at research reactors 5 | *Transportation of targets to/from research reactors and irradiation of targets at research reactors 5 | ||
6 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)*10 CFR 51.20*Project-specificdecision-Operation of the proposed Northwest facility would include target fabrication and scrap recovery-Environmental assessment might not support a finding of no significant impact 6 | |||
7 ScopingProcess*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri | |||
* | *Sixoralcomment er s*Eightcomment letters or emails 7 | ||
Environmental | Environmental Review AreasHumanHealthTerrestrial R e so u r c e sAirQualitySocioeconomics and EnvironmentalJusticeLandUseHistoric and CulturalResourcesWaterResourcesAquatic R e so u r c e sSoils 8 Environmental ImpactsResourceAreaImpactLand Use and VisualResourcesSMALLAir Quality andNoiseSMALLGeologicEnvironmentSMALLEcological and WaterResourcesSMALLHistoric and CulturalResourcesSMALLSocioeconomicsSMALLHuman Health andWasteSMALLTransportationSMALL 9 Consult a tionsActDeterminationEndangeredSpecies Act, Section 7No EffectNationalHistoric Preservatio n A ct , Section 106No Adverse Effect 10 Alternatives | ||
*No-actionalternative | *No-actionalternative | ||
*Alternativesite*Alternative technologies 11 Alternative Technologies | *Alternativesite*Alternative technologies 11 Alternative Technologies | ||
| Line 42: | Line 40: | ||
*Linear-accelerator | *Linear-accelerator | ||
-based-Analyzed indepth*Subcritical fission | -based-Analyzed indepth*Subcritical fission | ||
-Analyzed | -Analyzed indepth 12 Costs and Benefits*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission | ||
*Costs-Environmental andfinancial | *Costs-Environmental andfinancial*Benefits-Societal, medical, andeconomic 13 Draft Environmental Impact Statement*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri*Seven oral commenters | ||
*Benefits-Societal, medical, | *Five comment letters or emails 14 Staff Conclusion and Recommendation | ||
*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri*Seven oral commenters | |||
*Five comment letters or emails 14 | |||
*Benefits (societal, medical, and economic) outweigh the costs (environmental, economic | *Benefits (societal, medical, and economic) outweigh the costs (environmental, economic | ||
)*Considered reasonable alternatives | )*Considered reasonable alternatives | ||
*Recommend issuance of the | *Recommend issuance of the constructionpermit 15 Future NEPA Analyses*Application for an operating license | ||
*Application for a license to possess and use special nuclear material for target fabrication and scrap recovery | *Application for a license to possess and use special nuclear material for target fabrication and scrap recovery | ||
*License amendment requests from research reactors 16 | *License amendment requests from research reactors 16 Ac r onyms 17*EIS -Environmental Impact Statement | ||
*NEPA -National Environmental Policy Act | *NEPA -National Environmental Policy Act | ||
*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}} | *NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}} | ||
Revision as of 05:57, 6 July 2018
| ML18016B077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Northwest Medical Isotopes |
| Issue date: | 01/16/2018 |
| From: | NRC/OGC |
| To: | NRC/OCM |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-609-CP, Construction Permit Mndtry Hrg, RAS 54173 | |
| Download: ML18016B077 (17) | |
Text
Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Environmental Panel)*January 23, 2018 2 Panelists*Benjamin Beasley
-Chief , Environmental Review and NEPA Branch
,NRR*Nancy Martinez
-Physical Scientist
,NRR*Michelle Moser
-Biologist ,NRR*David Drucker
-Senior Project Manager
,NRR 2 Environmental Review*National Environmental PolicyAct*Environmental reviewprocess-10 CFR Part 51-Interim StaffGuidanceAugmenting NUREG-1537 for Licensing Radioisotope Production Facilities and Aqueous Homogenous Reactors 3 Scope of the Review: Proposed Action and Connected ActionsActions are connected if they:
-Automatically trigger other actions that may require environmental impact statements; or
-Cannot or will not proceed unless other actions are taken previously or simultaneously; or
-Are interdependent parts of a larger action and depend on the larger action for their justification 4
Proposed Action and Connected Actions
- Construction, operations, and decommissioning of the 10 CFR Part 50 production facility
- Construction, operations, and decommissioning related to target fabrication
- Transportation of targets to/from research reactors and irradiation of targets at research reactors 5
6 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)*10 CFR 51.20*Project-specificdecision-Operation of the proposed Northwest facility would include target fabrication and scrap recovery-Environmental assessment might not support a finding of no significant impact 6
7 ScopingProcess*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri
- Sixoralcomment er s*Eightcomment letters or emails 7
Environmental Review AreasHumanHealthTerrestrial R e so u r c e sAirQualitySocioeconomics and EnvironmentalJusticeLandUseHistoric and CulturalResourcesWaterResourcesAquatic R e so u r c e sSoils 8 Environmental ImpactsResourceAreaImpactLand Use and VisualResourcesSMALLAir Quality andNoiseSMALLGeologicEnvironmentSMALLEcological and WaterResourcesSMALLHistoric and CulturalResourcesSMALLSocioeconomicsSMALLHuman Health andWasteSMALLTransportationSMALL 9 Consult a tionsActDeterminationEndangeredSpecies Act, Section 7No EffectNationalHistoric Preservatio n A ct , Section 106No Adverse Effect 10 Alternatives
- No-actionalternative
- Alternativesite*Alternative technologies 11 Alternative Technologies
- Neutroncapture*Aqueous homogenousreactor*Selective gas extraction
- Linear-accelerator
-based-Analyzed indepth*Subcritical fission
-Analyzed indepth 12 Costs and Benefits*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission
- Costs-Environmental andfinancial*Benefits-Societal, medical, andeconomic 13 Draft Environmental Impact Statement*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri*Seven oral commenters
- Five comment letters or emails 14 Staff Conclusion and Recommendation
- Benefits (societal, medical, and economic) outweigh the costs (environmental, economic
)*Considered reasonable alternatives
- Recommend issuance of the constructionpermit 15 Future NEPA Analyses*Application for an operating license
- Application for a license to possess and use special nuclear material for target fabrication and scrap recovery
- License amendment requests from research reactors 16 Ac r onyms 17*EIS -Environmental Impact Statement
- NEPA -National Environmental Policy Act
- NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation