ML16202A098: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 20: Line 20:
[External_Sender]Fwd:NextEraSeabrook'sASR[2016SST0548] Hello Fred,  
[External_Sender]Fwd:NextEraSeabrook'sASR[2016SST0548] Hello Fred,  


Thank you. My second sentence was edited below as it was not accurately stated. sorry!
Thank you. My second sentence was edited below as it was not accurately stated. sorry!  
 
Debbie  
Debbie  


Begin forwarded message:
Begin forwarded message:  
From:DeborahGrinnellSent:Thursday,July07,20161:06PMTo:Buford,Angela<Angela.Buford@nrc.gov>
 
From:DeborahGrinnellSent:Thursday,July07,20161:06PMTo:Buford,Angela<Angela.Buford@nrc.gov
>


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
[External_Sender]NextEra'sASR  Hi Angela, Thank you for offering to answer C-10 questions on Seabrook's ASR unresolved issue. How long were you  auditing with NRC staff at Seabrook recently. What were the dates you were at Seabrook and where?? Containment in Unit 1 AND 2? The audit you and staff on October 27-29th 2015 you wrote:
[External_Sender]NextEra'sASR  Hi Angela,  
Audit Results. Prior to the audit, by letter dated October 2, 2015 (Accession No. ML15251A333), the staff issued new and follow up RAIs to request information pertaining to concerns associated with the applicant's June 30, 2015, submittal. The staff's concerns documented in the RAIs included: - Addressing recent operating experience concerning building deformation caused by global ASR expansion - Representativeness between test specimens and methodology of measurement and correlation of testing program to Seabrook structures - Uncertainties and variations associated with estimate of normalized modulus - Representative sample for monitoring through-wall expansion - Combined cracking index (CCI) as a surrogate for ASR expansion in the in-plane direction What are the NextEra answers to the questions above, as their responses were not providing a " sufficient technical basis" . NextEra withheld data in Seabrook's containment DONE by an MPR contractor, right? Or was it done be Texas staff.? After NextEra in 2010 did cores in Seabrook's control building, in 2012, two years later, NextEra NEVER WENT INSIDE CONTAINMENT.
 
Thank you for offering to answer C-10 questions on Seabrook's ASR unresolved issue. How long were you  auditing with NRC staff at Seabrook recently. What were the dates you were at Seabrook and where?? Containment in Unit 1 AND 2? The audit you and staff on October 27-29th 2015 you wrote:
 
Audit Results. Prior to the audit, by letter dated October 2, 2015 (Accession No. ML15251A333), the staff issued new and follow up RAIs to request information pertaining to concerns associated with the applicant's June 30, 2015, submittal. The staff's concerns documented in  
 
the RAIs included:
  - Addressing recent operating experience concerning building deformation caused by global ASR expansion
  - Representativeness between test specimens and methodology of measurement and correlation of testing program to Seabrook structures
  - Uncertainties and variations associated with estimate of normalized modulus
  - Representative sample for monitoring through-wall expansion
  - Combined cracking index (CCI) as a surrogate for ASR expansion in the in-plane direction
 
What are the NextEra answers to the questions above, as their responses were not providing a "
sufficient technical basis" . NextEra withheld data in Seabrook's containment DONE by an MPR contractor, right? Or was it done be Texas staff.? After NextEra in 2010 did cores in Seabrook's control building, in 2012, two years later, NextEra NEVER WENT INSIDE CONTAINMENT.  
 
Thank you,  
Thank you,  


Debbie}}
Debbie}}

Revision as of 05:48, 30 June 2018

Edited Email from D. Grinnell to a Buford/F. Bower Regarding Seabrook ASR Unresolved Issue
ML16202A098
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/2016
From: Grinnell D
- No Known Affiliation
To: Bower F L
Reactor Projects Branch 3
References
Download: ML16202A098 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ML16202A098 From:DeborahGrinnellSent:Tuesday,July12,20168:30PMTo:Bower,Fred<Fred.Bower@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender]Fwd:NextEraSeabrook'sASR[2016SST0548] Hello Fred,

Thank you. My second sentence was edited below as it was not accurately stated. sorry!

Debbie

Begin forwarded message:

From:DeborahGrinnellSent:Thursday,July07,20161:06PMTo:Buford,Angela<Angela.Buford@nrc.gov

>

Subject:

[External_Sender]NextEra'sASR Hi Angela,

Thank you for offering to answer C-10 questions on Seabrook's ASR unresolved issue. How long were you auditing with NRC staff at Seabrook recently. What were the dates you were at Seabrook and where?? Containment in Unit 1 AND 2? The audit you and staff on October 27-29th 2015 you wrote:

Audit Results. Prior to the audit, by letter dated October 2, 2015 (Accession No. ML15251A333), the staff issued new and follow up RAIs to request information pertaining to concerns associated with the applicant's June 30, 2015, submittal. The staff's concerns documented in

the RAIs included:

- Addressing recent operating experience concerning building deformation caused by global ASR expansion

- Representativeness between test specimens and methodology of measurement and correlation of testing program to Seabrook structures

- Uncertainties and variations associated with estimate of normalized modulus

- Representative sample for monitoring through-wall expansion

- Combined cracking index (CCI) as a surrogate for ASR expansion in the in-plane direction

What are the NextEra answers to the questions above, as their responses were not providing a "

sufficient technical basis" . NextEra withheld data in Seabrook's containment DONE by an MPR contractor, right? Or was it done be Texas staff.? After NextEra in 2010 did cores in Seabrook's control building, in 2012, two years later, NextEra NEVER WENT INSIDE CONTAINMENT.

Thank you,

Debbie

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML16202A098&oldid=763368"