|
|
Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:PRIDRITY1CCELERATEDRIDSPROCESSIVEG)REGULATORYINFORMATIONDISTRIBUTIONSYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSIONNBR:9505240223DOC.DATE:95/05/17NOTARIZED:NOFACXL:50-335St.LuciePlant,Unit1,FloridaPower&LightCo.AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONSAGER,D.A.FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAMERECIPIENTAFFILIATIONDocumentControlBranch(DocumentControlDesk)DOCKET05000335 | | {{#Wiki_filter:PRIDRITY1CCELERATEDRIDSPROCESSIVEG)REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9505240223 DOC.DATE: |
| | 95/05/17NOTARIZED: |
| | NOFACXL:50-335 St.LuciePlant,Unit1,FloridaPower&LightCo.AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION SAGER,D.A. |
| | FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)DOCKET05000335 |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| ApplicationforamendtolicenseDPR-67,extendingapplicabilityofcurrentRCSpressure/templimits&maximumallowedRCSheatup&cooldownratesto23.6EffectiveFullPowerYRsofoperation.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR/ENCL/SIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:GeneralDistributionNOTES:RECIPIENTXDCODE/NAMEPD2-1LANORRIS,JINTERNAL:ACRSNRR/DE/EMCBNRR/DSSA/SPLBNUDOCS-ABSTRACTEXTERNAL:NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL11116611111111RECXPIENTIDCODE/NAMEPD2-1PDFILECENTER01B'NRR/DSSA/SRXBOGC/HDS3NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111011NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEiVKSTE!CONTAC'I''I'IIEDOCL'ifENTCONTROLDESk,ROOAfPl-37(EAT.504-0033)TOELIXIINKTEYOL'RNAifL'ROifDISTRIBUTIONLIS'I'SI'ORDOCLMEN'I'SYOL'ON"I'lI'.D!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:LTTR.18ENCL17 FloridaPower&LightCompany,P.O.Box128,FortPierce,FL34954-0128May17,1995L-95-13910CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAttn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsPursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1byincorporatingtheattachedTechnicalSpecifications(TS)revisions.TheamendmentwillextendtheapplicabilityofthecurrentReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)Pressure/TemperatureLimitsandmaximumallowedRCSheatupandcooldownratesto23.6EffectiveFullPowerYearsofoperation.Inaddition,administrativechangesareproposedforTS3.1.2.1(BorationSystemsFlowPaths-Shutdown)andTS3.1.2.3(ChargingPump-Shutdown)toclarifytheconditionsforwhichaHighPressureSafetyInjectionpumpmaybeused.Itisrequestedthattheproposedamendment,ifapproved,beissuedbyMarch31,1996.Attachment1isanevaluationoftheproposedTSchanges.Attachment2isatableofSt.LucieUnit1ReactorVesselBeltlineAdjustedReferenceTemperaturesforDeterminingPressureTemperatureandLTOPLimitsCurves.Attachment3isthe"DeterminationofNoSignificantHazardsConsideration."Attachment4containsacopyoftheappropriateTSpagesmarked-uptoshowtheproposedchanges.TheproposedamendmenthasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower&LightCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordancewith10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyoftheproposedamendmentisbeingforwardedtotheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestionsaboutthissubmittal.Verytrulyyours,D.A.aerVicePidentSt.LucePlantanFPLGroupcompany Ig~4 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Page2DAS/RLDAttachmentscc:StewartD.Ebneter,RegionalAdministrator,RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector,USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti,FloridaDepartmentofHealthandRehabilitativeServices.
| | Application foramendtolicenseDPR-67,extending applicability ofcurrentRCSpressure/temp limits&maximumallowedRCSheatup&cooldownratesto23.6Effective FullPowerYRsofoperation. |
| St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~D.A.Sagerbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident,St.LuciePlantfortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower6LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoingdocumentithatthestatementsmadeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge,informationandbelief,andthatheisauthorizedtoexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.D.A.SerSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOFTheforegoinginstrumentwasacknowledgedbeforemethisIt~dayof,19'yD.A.Sager,whoispersonalyknowntomeandwhodidtakeanoath.NameofNotaryPublicMyCommissionexpiresSCommissionNo.2)Gal1S0~I'yOFFICIALNOTARySEALQy8~<)ALEXISRMOLENDA~COMMISSIONNIIMSSRCC156115yCOMMISSIONpXIsocT.ggqgg5 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT1EVALUATIONOFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES 1cSt.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemerature.LimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page1of8EVALUATIONOFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroductionFloridaPowerandLightCompany(FPL)proposestochangetheSt.LucieUnit1TechnicalSpecifications(TS)forReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)Pressure/TemperatureLimitsandmaximumallowedRCSheatupandcooldownrates.Theapplicabilityoftheexistingspecifiedlimitswillbeextendedfrom15EffectiveFullPowerYears(EFPY)to23.6EFPYofoperation.TheassociatedLowTemperatureOverpressureProtection(LTOP)requirementswilllikewisebeextended.Inaddition,administrativechangesareproposedforTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3toclarifytheconditionsrequiredifaHighPressureSafetyInjection(HPSI)pumpisusedtoestablishaborationflowpathduringoperationalModes5and6.DescritionofChanesMarked-upcopiesoftheaffectedTSpagesarecontainedinAttachment4.Adescriptionoftheproposedchangesfollows:1~TS3.4.9.1currentlyprovidesthepressureandtemperaturelimitsintermsofFigures3.4-2a,3.4-2b,and3.4-3fortheRCS(exceptthepressurizer)duringheatup,cooldown,criticality,andinserviceleakandhydrostatictestingfor15EFPY.Theproposedamendmentwouldusetheseexistingfigures,as-is,andonlyrevisethetitlebychanging"15EFPYttto>t236EFPY2~3~Footnote"*"isappendedtoTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3,applicableduringModes5and6,toproviderequirementsthatmustbemetiftheborationflowpathfromtheRefuelingWaterTank(RWT)isestablishedviaasingleHPSIpump.Thisfootnotewillberevisedtomoreclearlyindicatethatthespecifiedrequirementsapplytotheconditionwhennochargingpumpsareoperable.Figure3.1-lbspecifiesthemaximumallowableheatupandcooldownratesforthecasewhereasingleHPSIpumpisinoperationpursuanttoTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3.Thelimitofapplicabilityforthisfigurewillbeindicatedbyadding"23.6EFPY"tothetitle. | | DISTRIBUTION CODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR |
| St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page2of8BackroundThereactorcoolantpressureboundaryisdesignedpursuantto10CFRPart50,AppendixA,DesignCriteria14and31.Thesedesigncriteriarequirethatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarybedesigned,fabricated,erectedandtestedinordertohaveanextremelylowprobabilityofabnormalleakage,ofrapidlypropagatingfailure,andofgrossrupture.Thecriteriaalsorequirethatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarybedesignedwithsufficientmargintoassurethat,whenstressed,theboundarybehavesinanon-brittlemanner,andthattheprobabilityofrapidlypropagatingfractureisminimized.Pressure/Temperature(P/T)limitsaredevelopedtoprovideadequatesafetymarginsforthepreventionoffractureoftheRCScoolantpressureboundarypursuantto10CFR50,AppendixG,"FractureToughnessRequirements."TheASMECodeformsthebasisfortheserequirements.ThemethodtopredictthereactorvesselmaterialirradiationdamageisprovidedinUSNRCRegulatoryGuide(RG)1.99,Rev.2,"RadiationEmbrittlementofReactorVesselMaterials".TheexistingP/Tlimitswereimplementedin1990,andarebasedonpredictionsforupto15EFPYofreactoroperation.ItisanticipatedthatPSL1willachieve15EFPYofoperationduringthespringof1996.FPLrecalculatedthepredictedmaterialradiationdamagebasedonrecent.dataobtainedinresponsetoNRCGenericLetter92OlgReactorVesselStructuralIntegrity."UsingthisnewdataandRG1.99,Rev.2,itwasdeterminedthattheexistingmaterialradiationdamagepredictioncanbeextendedto23.6EFPYofoperation.AdditionalassurancethatRCSP/TlimitswillnotbeexceededinthelowertemperatureoperatingmodesisprovidedbytheLowTemperatureOverpressureProtection(LTOP)system.Analysesforthissystemconsidertheinitiationofassumedenergy-additionandmass-additiontransientswhileoperatingatlowtemperaturesinaccordancewithStandardReviewPlan5.2.2,Revision2.BasesforProosedTSChanesTheanalysisfortheP/TlimitsandLTOPrequirementsfor15EFPYwereprovidedwithFPLletterL-89-408(Reference3),andsubsequentlyapprovedbytheissuanceofAmendmentNo.104(Reference1)tothefacilityoperatinglicense.Thebasisfordeterminingthattheselimitscanbeextendedto23.6EFPYisprovidedbelowbyreviewingtheconclusionsofeachsectionoftheanalysis. | | /ENCL/SIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal: |
| 'II St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page3of8EXTENDINGTHEAPPLICABILITYOFTHEP/TLIMITCURVESTheP/Tlimitcurveanalysisfor15EFPYwasdevelopedusingtherequirementsof10CFR50AppendixG.ThebasiccalculationmethodwasreferencedtoASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCode,SectionIII,AppendixG(1986).Thecurrentmethodisunchangedexceptthatin1992ASMErelocatedAppendixGtoSectionXI,andthereferencestressintensity,Km,isnowreferredtoasK.TheirradiatedmaterialpropertiesfortheP/TlimitcurvesarebasedupontheirradiationdamagepredictionmethodsofRG1.99,Rev.2,whichareusedtocalculatetheadjustedreferencetemperature(ART)forallreactorvesselbeltlinematerials.TheseARTpredictionsutilizeinitialmaterialtestproperties,materialchemistry,neutronfluenceandmargin,andistheprimarymaterialvariableinputthatisconsideredintheP/Tanalysis.AhigherARTvalueismorelimitingforplantoperation.TheARTisdeterminedforthereactorvessellimitingbeltlinematerialsfortheperiodofapplicabilityfortheP/Tlimitcurvesbasedonthepredictedneutronfluence.ThesevaluesareshowninthefirstportionofTable1(Attachment2ofthissubmittal).ThecontrollingvaluesofARTusedfortheP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPanalysisat15EFPYwere191Fatthe1/4Thickness(1/4T)locationand137'Fatthe3/4Thickness(3/4T)location(Ref.3,Attachment4,page9).Thecontrollingmaterialwasthelowershelllongitudinalwelds(3-203A,BandC,materialheatnumber305424)forthe1/4Tlocationandtwoofthelowershellplates(C-8-1andC-8-2)forthe3/4Tlocation.Theterm"controlling"meanshavingthehighestARTforagiventimeandpositionwithinthevesselwall.ThehighestART'sarethenusedtodeveloptheP/Tlimitsforthecorrespondingperiod.NotethatindevelopingtheP/Tlimits,aboundingmaterial(SA302GradeB)isassumed. | | GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT XDCODE/NAME PD2-1LANORRIS,JINTERNAL: |
| St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page4of8RG1.99,Rev.2,predictionsforARTaredeterminedfromthefollowingformulas:ART=InitialRT~T+dZT~T+MarginInitialRTDTReferencetemperature('F)fortheun-irradiatedmaterial.MTgDyMargin(CF)f(0.28-0.10logQ"CF"('F)isthechemistryfactor,afunctionofCopperandNickelcontentoftheweldorbasematerial."f"isthecalculatedneutronfluence(10'/cm,E>1MeV)atthedepthintothevesselfromtheinsidediameterwettedsurfacetothepostulatedflaw(surface,1/4Tand3/4T).Projectionsoffluencearemadeforspecificperiodsoftimeofoperation(EFPY).ThethicknessT,withoutthecladding,isconservativelyusedtogiveahigherprojectedRT~DT.Thequantity('F)tobeaddedtoobtainaconservativeupperboundvalueofART.2(0~+0~)"0',=O'Fformeasuredtestvalues,17forgenericdatao'~=17'Fforplateand28'FforweldsNewbeltlineweldmaterialdatabecameavailableasaresultoftheresearchneededtorespondtoNRCGenericLetter92-01.ThisdataishighlightedinthesecondsectionofTable1.Asdescribedbelow,theplantspecificdatasignificantlyreducesthevaluesusedincalculatingtheART.Forthelimitinglowerlongitudinalwelds,thedataincludednewchemistryvaluesforcopperandnickel,andanactualinitialRTz,T.ThisnewdatacamefromtheDuquesneLightCo. | | ACRSNRR/DE/EMCB NRR/DSSA/SPLBNUDOCS-ABSTRACT EXTERNAL: |
| St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page5of8BeaverValleyUnit1reactorvesselsurveillanceprogram(Ref.4),whichhasmaterialidenticaltotheSt.LucieUnit1lowerlongitudinalwelds.AsaresultofusingactualplantspecificRT>>Tdata,theoverallmargintermisreducedfrom65.5'Fto56'F,becausea,becomes0'F.TheinitialRT>>~isloweredfrom-56'Fto-60'F.ThenewchemistryvalueswereusedwithexistingSt.Lucie1qualificationdatatogetnewaveragecopperandnickelvalues(Ref.4),whichloweredthe'Fvaluefrom200.2to191.7.BasedonthesurveillancecapsuledataremovedfromtheSt.LucieUnit1reactorvessel,theCF'sforthelimitinglowershellplateswerecalculatedandprovidedtoFPLbytheNRC(Ref.5).ThenewCFvalueswerelowered,nominallyfrom108to80.SinceplantspecificdataisusedtocalculatetheCF,themarginterm(cr~)canbehalvedfrom34'Fto17'F(RG1.99,Rev.2,Position2.1).ThisdataishighlightedinthesecondsectionofTable1.Usingthenewdata,FPLcalculated(Ref.6)theneutronfluencethatwouldresultinvaluesofRTNDTequaltoorlessthanthelimitingARTsdeterminedinthe15EFPYanalysis.Thenewvaluesoffluencecorrespondto23.6EFPY,asshowninthethirdsectionofTable1.Notethatthelowerlongitudinalweldsarenowthecontrollingmaterialatboththe1/4Tand3/4Tlocations.Sincethe23.6EFPYlimitingRT>>~valueswereequaltoorlessthanthoseusedinthe15EFPYanalysis,thecurrentTechnicalSpecificationP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPanalysiswouldbeapplicableforaperiodnottoexceed23.6EFPYwiththesamemarginofsafetyastheprevious15EFPYanalysis.ThisequivalencecoverstheP/Tlimitsforheatup,cooldown,hydrostatictestandcorecriticaloperation.2~LOWESTSERVICETEMPERATURE,MINIMUMBOLTUPTEMPERATURE,ANDMINIMUMPRESSURELIMITSTheP/Tanalysisfor15EFPYcalculatedthelimitsforlowestservicetemperature,minimumboltuptemperature,andminimumpressurelimitsforreference.Theselimitsarenotbasedonaccumulatedfluenceatthereactorvesselbeltlinematerial,andremainunchanged.ThelowestservicetemperatureisbasedonthemostlimitingRT>>TforthebalanceofRCScomponents,whichistheReactorCoolantPump(RCP).Accumulatedplantoperationdoesnoteffectthiscomponent'smaterialproperties,thereforethelowestservicetemperatureremainsthesame. | | NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL11116611111111RECXPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD2-1PDFILECENTER01B'NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS3NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111011NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS: |
| =0 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page6of8Theminimumboltuptemperatureisbasedonthehigherstressedregionofthereactorvessel,plusanyeffectsforirradiationeffects(Ref.3)andtestinguncertainty.ThemaximuminitialRT~Tassociatedwiththestressedregionofthereactorvesselflangeis30'F.Forconservatismaminimumboltuptemperatureof80'Fisutilized,whichmorethanaccountsforanyirradiationeffectsandtestinguncertainty(Ref.3).Thefluenceat.theflangeregionisatleasttwoordersofmagnitudelowerthanthepeakvesselfluenceatthebeltlinematerials(i.e.,atfuelcoremidplane).Reference9indicatesthatthefluenceatthetopoftheactivecore,whichislessthan79inchesabovethecoremidplane,decreasesto0.1timesthepeakfluenceatthecoremid-plane.Theflangeisapproximately130inchesabovethetopofthecore,resultinginareductionfromthepeakfluencebyatleasttwoordersofmagnitude.Therefore,theradiationaffectsareminimal,andthe50'Fmarginissufficienttoaccountforanychangesinflangematerialfracturetoughness.Theminimumpressurelimitisthebreakpointbetweentheminimumboltuptemperatureandthelowestservicetemperature,andisdefinedbytheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCodeas204ofthepre-operationalhydrostaticpressure(Ref.3).Thisvaluewasnotaffectedbyaccumulatedplantoperation.3~CORRECTIONFACTORSSincetheP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPsetpointsarebasedoncoordinatesofpressurizerpressureandindicatedRCSfluidtemperature,correctionfactorsareincludedintheanalysistoaccountforactualconditionsatthelimitingbeltlinematerials.TheP/TlimitsandLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYprovidedforthesecorrectionfactors,whichaddresstheconcernsofNRCInformationNotice(IN)93-58"Non-conservatisminLow-TemperatureOverpressureProtectionforPressurizedMaterReactors"(Ref.8).Thelead/lagtemperaturedifferentialbetweenthevesselbasemetalandtheRCSbulkfluidhasbeenaccountedfor.Pressurecorrectionfactorswerebasedupon:1)thestaticheadduetotheelevationdifferenceofthevesselwalladjacenttotheactivecoreandthepressurizerpressureinstrumentnozzle,and;2)thepressuredifferentialbasedonthenumberofreactorcoolantpumps(RCP's)inoperation.ActualpressureatthecoreregionwouldbehigherthanattheRCShotlegandthepressurizerbytheamountofheadlossdue St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page7of8toRCPflowandthestatichead.Below200'F,flowinducedpressuredropisbasedontwoRCP'sinoperation;above200'F,pressuredropisbasedonthreeRCP'sinoperation.ThisaddressestheconcernsdocumentedinIN93-58.InstrumentuncertaintieshavenotbeenincludedintheP/Tcurves.Theuncertainties(errors)weredeterminedtobeinsignificantrelativetotheconservatismofthemargintermsincludedintheASMESectionIII,AppendixG,method.NRCconcurrencewasdocumentedinthe15EFPYanalysis.Correctionfactorsarenotaffectedbyneutronfluence,and,therefore,remainunchangedbytheextensionofapplicabilityto23.6EFPY.4~LTOPANALYSISTheobjectiveoftheLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYwastoprecludeviolationoftheP/Tlimitsduringstartupandshutdownconditions.TheLTOPanalysisremainsunchangedbytheapplicabilityextensionto23.6EFPYbecausetheP/Tlimitcurvesarenotbeingchanged.Thereforeitisnotnecessarytore-analyzeormodifytheLTOPsystem.ArelaxationoftheLTOPrequirementsfromASMECodeCaseN-514wasincorporatedinthe1993Addenda.Thecodecasepermitsthemaximumpressureinthevesseltobe110%ofthepressuredeterminedtosatisfytheP/TlimitsperAppendixGofSectionXI,ArticleG-2215.The15EFPYLTOPanalysisisinherentlyconservativeinthatthesetpointsforpoweroperatedreliefvalvesandadministrativeandoperationalcontrolsprotectthe1004valueoftheP/Tlimits.5.AMENDINGTHEFOOTNOTEFORUSEOFHPSIASABORATIONPATHOneresultoftheLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYwasarequirementtolimitthemassadditionrateofaHPSIpumpwhenitisusedasaborationpathduringshutdown,withRCSpressureboundaryintegrityestablished.ThemethodtolimitthemassadditionratewastoclosetwoofthefourHPSIheaderisolationvalves.However,thisrequirementonlyapplieswhenRCSpressureboundaryintegrityexists.Thesyntaxusedinfootnote"*"toTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3couldresultinanunnecessaryrestrictiveinterpretationoftherequirementstoclosetheHPSIheaderisolationvalves.TheproposedrevisionclarifiesthatclosingtwoHPSIvalvesisonlyrequiredunderpart(b)ofthefootnote,e.g.,whennochargingpumpsareoperableandRCSpressureboundaryintegrityexists. | | PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEiVKSTE!CONTAC'I''I'IIEDOCL'ifENTCONTROLDESk,ROOAfPl-37(EAT.504-0033)TOELIXIINKTEYOL'RNAifL'ROifDISTRIBUTION LIS'I'SI'ORDOCLMEN'I'SYOL'ON"I'lI'.D!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED: |
| St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment1Page8of8ConclusionTheproposedperiodofapplicabilityisbasedonprojectionsofirradiationembrittlementforthereactorvesselbeltlinelimitingmaterials.Since1990,whenthecurrentP/Tlimitcurveswereapproved,newmaterialpropertydatahasbecomeavailabletomakebetterpredictionsofembrittlementforthelimitingbeltlinematerials.Usingthenewdata,theperiodofapplicabilityfortheexistingP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPrequirementscanbeextendedfrom15EFPYto23.6EFPYwiththesameanalyzedmarginofsafety. | | LTTR.18ENCL17 FloridaPower&LightCompany,P.O.Box128,FortPierce,FL34954-0128 May17,1995L-95-13910CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsPursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1byincorporating theattachedTechnical Specifications (TS)revisions. |
| | Theamendment willextendtheapplicability ofthecurrentReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)Pressure/Temperature LimitsandmaximumallowedRCSheatupandcooldownratesto23.6Effective FullPowerYearsofoperation. |
| | Inaddition, administrative changesareproposedforTS3.1.2.1(Boration SystemsFlowPaths-Shutdown) andTS3.1.2.3(Charging Pump-Shutdown) toclarifytheconditions forwhichaHighPressureSafetyInjection pumpmaybeused.Itisrequested thattheproposedamendment, ifapproved, beissuedbyMarch31,1996.Attachment 1isanevaluation oftheproposedTSchanges.Attachment 2isatableofSt.LucieUnit1ReactorVesselBeltlineAdjustedReference Temperatures forDetermining PressureTemperature andLTOPLimitsCurves.Attachment 3isthe"Determination ofNoSignificant HazardsConsideration." |
| | Attachment 4containsacopyoftheappropriate TSpagesmarked-up toshowtheproposedchanges.Theproposedamendment hasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower&LightCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordance with10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyoftheproposedamendment isbeingforwarded totheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestions aboutthissubmittal. |
| | Verytrulyyours,D.A.aerVicePidentSt.LucePlantanFPLGroupcompany Ig~4 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Page2DAS/RLDAttachments cc:StewartD.Ebneter,RegionalAdministrator, RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti, FloridaDepartment ofHealthandRehabilitative Services. |
| | St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~D.A.Sagerbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident, St.LuciePlantfortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower6LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoing documenti thatthestatements madeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge, information andbelief,andthatheisauthorized toexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee. |
| | D.A.SerSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOFTheforegoing instrument wasacknowledged beforemethisIt~dayof,19'yD.A.Sager,whoispersonalyknowntomeandwhodidtakeanoath.NameofNotaryPublicMyCommission expiresSCommission No.2)Gal1S0~I'yOFFICIALNOTARySEALQy8~<)ALEXISRMOLENDA~COMMISSION NIIMSSRCC156115yCOMMISSION pXIsocT.ggqgg5 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT 1EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES 1cSt.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemerature.LimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page1of8EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroduction FloridaPowerandLightCompany(FPL)proposestochangetheSt.LucieUnit1Technical Specifications (TS)forReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)Pressure/Temperature LimitsandmaximumallowedRCSheatupandcooldownrates.Theapplicability oftheexistingspecified limitswillbeextendedfrom15Effective FullPowerYears(EFPY)to23.6EFPYofoperation. |
| | Theassociated LowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)requirements willlikewisebeextended. |
| | Inaddition, administrative changesareproposedforTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3toclarifytheconditions requiredifaHighPressureSafetyInjection (HPSI)pumpisusedtoestablish aborationflowpathduringoperational Modes5and6.DescritionofChanesMarked-up copiesoftheaffectedTSpagesarecontained inAttachment 4.Adescription oftheproposedchangesfollows:1~TS3.4.9.1currently providesthepressureandtemperature limitsintermsofFigures3.4-2a,3.4-2b,and3.4-3fortheRCS(exceptthepressurizer) duringheatup,cooldown, criticality, andinservice leakandhydrostatic testingfor15EFPY.Theproposedamendment wouldusetheseexistingfigures,as-is,andonlyrevisethetitlebychanging"15EFPYttto>t236EFPY2~3~Footnote"*"isappendedtoTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3,applicable duringModes5and6,toproviderequirements thatmustbemetiftheborationflowpathfromtheRefueling WaterTank(RWT)isestablished viaasingleHPSIpump.Thisfootnotewillberevisedtomoreclearlyindicatethatthespecified requirements applytothecondition whennochargingpumpsareoperable. |
| | Figure3.1-lbspecifies themaximumallowable heatupandcooldownratesforthecasewhereasingleHPSIpumpisinoperation pursuanttoTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3.Thelimitofapplicability forthisfigurewillbeindicated byadding"23.6EFPY"tothetitle. |
| | St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page2of8BackroundThereactorcoolantpressureboundaryisdesignedpursuantto10CFRPart50,AppendixA,DesignCriteria14and31.Thesedesigncriteriarequirethatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarybedesigned, fabricated, erectedandtestedinordertohaveanextremely lowprobability ofabnormalleakage,ofrapidlypropagating failure,andofgrossrupture.Thecriteriaalsorequirethatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarybedesignedwithsufficient margintoassurethat,whenstressed, theboundarybehavesinanon-brittle manner,andthattheprobability ofrapidlypropagating fractureisminimized. |
| | Pressure/Temperature (P/T)limitsaredeveloped toprovideadequatesafetymarginsfortheprevention offractureoftheRCScoolantpressureboundarypursuantto10CFR50,AppendixG,"Fracture Toughness Requirements." |
| | TheASMECodeformsthebasisfortheserequirements. |
| | Themethodtopredictthereactorvesselmaterialirradiation damageisprovidedinUSNRCRegulatory Guide(RG)1.99,Rev.2,"Radiation Embrittlement ofReactorVesselMaterials". |
| | TheexistingP/Tlimitswereimplemented in1990,andarebasedonpredictions forupto15EFPYofreactoroperation. |
| | Itisanticipated thatPSL1willachieve15EFPYofoperation duringthespringof1996.FPLrecalculated thepredicted materialradiation damagebasedonrecent.dataobtainedinresponsetoNRCGenericLetter92OlgReactorVesselStructural Integrity." |
| | UsingthisnewdataandRG1.99,Rev.2,itwasdetermined thattheexistingmaterialradiation damageprediction canbeextendedto23.6EFPYofoperation. |
| | Additional assurance thatRCSP/Tlimitswillnotbeexceededinthelowertemperature operating modesisprovidedbytheLowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)system.Analysesforthissystemconsidertheinitiation ofassumedenergy-addition andmass-addition transients whileoperating atlowtemperatures inaccordance withStandardReviewPlan5.2.2,Revision2.BasesforProosedTSChanesTheanalysisfortheP/TlimitsandLTOPrequirements for15EFPYwereprovidedwithFPLletterL-89-408(Reference 3),andsubsequently approvedbytheissuanceofAmendment No.104(Reference 1)tothefacilityoperating license.Thebasisfordetermining thattheselimitscanbeextendedto23.6EFPYisprovidedbelowbyreviewing theconclusions ofeachsectionoftheanalysis. |
| | 'II St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page3of8EXTENDING THEAPPLICABILITY OFTHEP/TLIMITCURVESTheP/Tlimitcurveanalysisfor15EFPYwasdeveloped usingtherequirements of10CFR50AppendixG.Thebasiccalculation methodwasreferenced toASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCode,SectionIII,AppendixG(1986).Thecurrentmethodisunchanged exceptthatin1992ASMErelocated AppendixGtoSectionXI,andthereference stressintensity, Km,isnowreferredtoasK.Theirradiated materialproperties fortheP/Tlimitcurvesarebasedupontheirradiation damageprediction methodsofRG1.99,Rev.2,whichareusedtocalculate theadjustedreference temperature (ART)forallreactorvesselbeltlinematerials. |
| | TheseARTpredictions utilizeinitialmaterialtestproperties, materialchemistry, neutronfluenceandmargin,andistheprimarymaterialvariableinputthatisconsidered intheP/Tanalysis. |
| | AhigherARTvalueismorelimitingforplantoperation. |
| | TheARTisdetermined forthereactorvessellimitingbeltlinematerials fortheperiodofapplicability fortheP/Tlimitcurvesbasedonthepredicted neutronfluence.ThesevaluesareshowninthefirstportionofTable1(Attachment 2ofthissubmittal). |
| | Thecontrolling valuesofARTusedfortheP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPanalysisat15EFPYwere191Fatthe1/4Thickness (1/4T)locationand137'Fatthe3/4Thickness (3/4T)location(Ref.3,Attachment 4,page9).Thecontrolling materialwasthelowershelllongitudinal welds(3-203A,BandC,materialheatnumber305424)forthe1/4Tlocationandtwoofthelowershellplates(C-8-1andC-8-2)forthe3/4Tlocation. |
| | Theterm"controlling" meanshavingthehighestARTforagiventimeandpositionwithinthevesselwall.ThehighestART'sarethenusedtodeveloptheP/Tlimitsforthecorresponding period.Notethatindeveloping theP/Tlimits,aboundingmaterial(SA302GradeB)isassumed. |
| | St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page4of8RG1.99,Rev.2,predictions forARTaredetermined fromthefollowing formulas: |
| | ART=InitialRT~T+dZT~T+MarginInitialRTDTReference temperature |
| | ('F)fortheun-irradiated material. |
| | MTgDyMargin(CF)f(0.28-0.10logQ"CF"('F)isthechemistry factor,afunctionofCopperandNickelcontentoftheweldorbasematerial. |
| | "f"isthecalculated neutronfluence(10'/cm,E>1MeV)atthedepthintothevesselfromtheinsidediameterwettedsurfacetothepostulated flaw(surface, 1/4Tand3/4T).Projections offluencearemadeforspecificperiodsoftimeofoperation (EFPY).Thethickness T,withoutthecladding, isconservatively usedtogiveahigherprojected RT~DT.Thequantity('F)tobeaddedtoobtainaconservative upperboundvalueofART.2(0~+0~)"0',=O'Fformeasuredtestvalues,17forgenericdatao'~=17'Fforplateand28'FforweldsNewbeltlineweldmaterialdatabecameavailable asaresultoftheresearchneededtorespondtoNRCGenericLetter92-01.Thisdataishighlighted inthesecondsectionofTable1.Asdescribed below,theplantspecificdatasignificantly reducesthevaluesusedincalculating theART.Forthelimitinglowerlongitudinal welds,thedataincludednewchemistry valuesforcopperandnickel,andanactualinitialRTz,T.ThisnewdatacamefromtheDuquesneLightCo. |
| | St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page5of8BeaverValleyUnit1reactorvesselsurveillance program(Ref.4),whichhasmaterialidentical totheSt.LucieUnit1lowerlongitudinal welds.AsaresultofusingactualplantspecificRT>>Tdata,theoverallmargintermisreducedfrom65.5'Fto56'F,becausea,becomes0'F.TheinitialRT>>~isloweredfrom-56'Fto-60'F.Thenewchemistry valueswereusedwithexistingSt.Lucie1qualification datatogetnewaveragecopperandnickelvalues(Ref.4),whichloweredthe'Fvaluefrom200.2to191.7.Basedonthesurveillance capsuledataremovedfromtheSt.LucieUnit1reactorvessel,theCF'sforthelimitinglowershellplateswerecalculated andprovidedtoFPLbytheNRC(Ref.5).ThenewCFvalueswerelowered,nominally from108to80.Sinceplantspecificdataisusedtocalculate theCF,themarginterm(cr~)canbehalvedfrom34'Fto17'F(RG1.99,Rev.2,Position2.1).Thisdataishighlighted inthesecondsectionofTable1.Usingthenewdata,FPLcalculated (Ref.6)theneutronfluencethatwouldresultinvaluesofRTNDTequaltoorlessthanthelimitingARTsdetermined inthe15EFPYanalysis. |
| | Thenewvaluesoffluencecorrespond to23.6EFPY,asshowninthethirdsectionofTable1.Notethatthelowerlongitudinal weldsarenowthecontrolling materialatboththe1/4Tand3/4Tlocations. |
| | Sincethe23.6EFPYlimitingRT>>~valueswereequaltoorlessthanthoseusedinthe15EFPYanalysis, thecurrentTechnical Specification P/TlimitcurvesandLTOPanalysiswouldbeapplicable foraperiodnottoexceed23.6EFPYwiththesamemarginofsafetyastheprevious15EFPYanalysis. |
| | Thisequivalence coverstheP/Tlimitsforheatup,cooldown, hydrostatic testandcorecriticaloperation. |
| | 2~LOWESTSERVICETEMPERATURE, MINIMUMBOLTUPTEMPERATURE, ANDMINIMUMPRESSURELIMITSTheP/Tanalysisfor15EFPYcalculated thelimitsforlowestservicetemperature, minimumboltuptemperature, andminimumpressurelimitsforreference. |
| | Theselimitsarenotbasedonaccumulated fluenceatthereactorvesselbeltlinematerial, andremainunchanged. |
| | Thelowestservicetemperature isbasedonthemostlimitingRT>>TforthebalanceofRCScomponents, whichistheReactorCoolantPump(RCP).Accumulated plantoperation doesnoteffectthiscomponent's materialproperties, therefore thelowestservicetemperature remainsthesame. |
| | =0 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page6of8Theminimumboltuptemperature isbasedonthehigherstressedregionofthereactorvessel,plusanyeffectsforirradiation effects(Ref.3)andtestinguncertainty. |
| | ThemaximuminitialRT~Tassociated withthestressedregionofthereactorvesselflangeis30'F.Forconservatism aminimumboltuptemperature of80'Fisutilized, whichmorethanaccountsforanyirradiation effectsandtestinguncertainty (Ref.3).Thefluenceat.theflangeregionisatleasttwoordersofmagnitude lowerthanthepeakvesselfluenceatthebeltlinematerials (i.e.,atfuelcoremidplane). |
| | Reference 9indicates thatthefluenceatthetopoftheactivecore,whichislessthan79inchesabovethecoremidplane, decreases to0.1timesthepeakfluenceatthecoremid-plane. |
| | Theflangeisapproximately 130inchesabovethetopofthecore,resulting inareduction fromthepeakfluencebyatleasttwoordersofmagnitude. |
| | Therefore, theradiation affectsareminimal,andthe50'Fmarginissufficient toaccountforanychangesinflangematerialfracturetoughness. |
| | Theminimumpressurelimitisthebreakpointbetweentheminimumboltuptemperature andthelowestservicetemperature, andisdefinedbytheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCodeas204ofthepre-operational hydrostatic pressure(Ref.3).Thisvaluewasnotaffectedbyaccumulated plantoperation. |
| | 3~CORRECTION FACTORSSincetheP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPsetpoints arebasedoncoordinates ofpressurizer pressureandindicated RCSfluidtemperature, correction factorsareincludedintheanalysistoaccountforactualconditions atthelimitingbeltlinematerials. |
| | TheP/TlimitsandLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYprovidedforthesecorrection factors,whichaddresstheconcernsofNRCInformation Notice(IN)93-58"Non-conservatism inLow-Temperature Overpressure Protection forPressurized MaterReactors" (Ref.8).Thelead/lagtemperature differential betweenthevesselbasemetalandtheRCSbulkfluidhasbeenaccounted for.Pressurecorrection factorswerebasedupon:1)thestaticheadduetotheelevation difference ofthevesselwalladjacenttotheactivecoreandthepressurizer pressureinstrument nozzle,and;2)thepressuredifferential basedonthenumberofreactorcoolantpumps(RCP's)inoperation. |
| | ActualpressureatthecoreregionwouldbehigherthanattheRCShotlegandthepressurizer bytheamountofheadlossdue St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page7of8toRCPflowandthestatichead.Below200'F,flowinducedpressuredropisbasedontwoRCP'sinoperation; above200'F,pressuredropisbasedonthreeRCP'sinoperation. |
| | Thisaddresses theconcernsdocumented inIN93-58.Instrument uncertainties havenotbeenincludedintheP/Tcurves.Theuncertainties (errors)weredetermined tobeinsignificant relativetotheconservatism ofthemargintermsincludedintheASMESectionIII,AppendixG,method.NRCconcurrence wasdocumented inthe15EFPYanalysis. |
| | Correction factorsarenotaffectedbyneutronfluence,and,therefore, remainunchanged bytheextension ofapplicability to23.6EFPY.4~LTOPANALYSISTheobjective oftheLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYwastoprecludeviolation oftheP/Tlimitsduringstartupandshutdownconditions. |
| | TheLTOPanalysisremainsunchanged bytheapplicability extension to23.6EFPYbecausetheP/Tlimitcurvesarenotbeingchanged.Therefore itisnotnecessary tore-analyze ormodifytheLTOPsystem.Arelaxation oftheLTOPrequirements fromASMECodeCaseN-514wasincorporated inthe1993Addenda.Thecodecasepermitsthemaximumpressureinthevesseltobe110%ofthepressuredetermined tosatisfytheP/TlimitsperAppendixGofSectionXI,ArticleG-2215.The15EFPYLTOPanalysisisinherently conservative inthatthesetpoints forpoweroperatedreliefvalvesandadministrative andoperational controlsprotectthe1004valueoftheP/Tlimits.5.AMENDINGTHEFOOTNOTEFORUSEOFHPSIASABORATIONPATHOneresultoftheLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYwasarequirement tolimitthemassadditionrateofaHPSIpumpwhenitisusedasaborationpathduringshutdown, withRCSpressureboundaryintegrity established. |
| | ThemethodtolimitthemassadditionratewastoclosetwoofthefourHPSIheaderisolation valves.However,thisrequirement onlyapplieswhenRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists.Thesyntaxusedinfootnote"*"toTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3couldresultinanunnecessary restrictive interpretation oftherequirements toclosetheHPSIheaderisolation valves.Theproposedrevisionclarifies thatclosingtwoHPSIvalvesisonlyrequiredunderpart(b)ofthefootnote, e.g.,whennochargingpumpsareoperableandRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists. |
| | St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page8of8Conclusion Theproposedperiodofapplicability isbasedonprojections ofirradiation embrittlement forthereactorvesselbeltlinelimitingmaterials. |
| | Since1990,whenthecurrentP/Tlimitcurveswereapproved, newmaterialpropertydatahasbecomeavailable tomakebetterpredictions ofembrittlement forthelimitingbeltlinematerials. |
| | Usingthenewdata,theperiodofapplicability fortheexistingP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPrequirements canbeextendedfrom15EFPYto23.6EFPYwiththesameanalyzedmarginofsafety. |
|
| |
|
| ==REFERENCES:== | | ==REFERENCES:== |
| 1~2~3~4~5.6.7~8.9.USNRClettertoJ.H.Goldberg,"St.LucieUnit1-IssuanceofAmendmentRe:PressureTemperature(P/T)LimitsandLowTemperatureOverpressureProtection(LTOP)Analysis(TACNo.75386)",datedJunell,1990.(Amendment104)(Notused)FPLlettertoUSNRC,L-89-408,"St.LucieUnit1,DocketNo.50-335,ProposedLicenseAmendment,P-TLimitsandLTOPAnalysis",datedDecember5,1989.FPLlettertoUSNRC,L-93-286,"St.LucieUnit1and2,DocketNo.50-335and50-389,GenericLetter92-01,Revision1,ResponsetoRequestforAdditionalInformation(RAI)",datedNovember15,1993.USNRCLettertoJ.H.Goldberg;GenericLetter(GL)92-01,Revision1,"ReactorVesselStructuralIntegrity,"St.LucieUnit1and2(TACNOSM83505andM83506);May26,1994.FPLcalculationPSL-lFJM-95-004,Rev.0,"St.LucieUnit1ReactorVesselAdjustedReferenceTemperatureandLTOPlimitsat23.6EFPY",dated3/22/95.USNRCGenericLetter92-01"ReactorVesselStructuralIntegrity",Revision1,DatedMarch6,1992.USNRCInformationNotice93-58"Non-conservatisminLow-TemperatureOverpressureProtectionforPressurizedWaterReactors",datedJuly26,1993.CEReportTR-F-MCM-004"FPL,PSL-1EvaluationofIrradiatedCapsuleW97",datedDecember,1983. | | |
| St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT2TABLE1ST~LUCIEUNIT1REACTORVESSELBELTLINEADJUSTEDREFERENCETEMPERATURESFORDETERMININGPRESSURETEMPERATUREANDLTOPLIMITSCURVES TABLE1:STLUCIEUNIT1REACTORVESSELBELTLINEADJUSTEDREFERENCETEMPERATURESFORDETERMININGPRESSURETEMPERATUREANDLTOPLIMITSCURVES15YEARPT/LTOPCURVESUSINGEXISTING1989ANALYSIS(Originalcriticalvaluesbolded)LOCATIONID¹Cu%Ni%CALC.CFTABLECFINITIALRTndtMARGIN15EFPYPEAKFLUENCE,E19n/cm21/4TFLUENCE15YEARART15YEAR3/4TFLUENCE91/4TART93/4TLowershellsteLowershellsteInttoLowerirthweldsC-8-1C-8-2901360.150.150.230.560.570.11107.8108.4109.820OF20oF-60oF34OF34oF56oF2.05E+192.05E+192.05E+191.22E+191.22E+191.22E+194.34E+18168oF4.34E+181BBOF4.34E+18112OF137oF137OF80OFLowerlongitudinalwelds3054240.30O.B4200.2-56oF65.5oF1.202E+197.16E+182.54E+18191F135oFNEWCHEMISTRYFACTORS5MARGINSBASEDONGL92-01VALUES(ChangesresultingfromnewdatasubmittedwithGL92-01anduseofcapsuledataforplatesbolded)LOCATIONID¹CU%CALC.CFTABLECFINITIALRTndtMARGINLowershellsteLowershellsteInttoLowerirthweldsLowerlongitudinalweldsC-8-1C-8-2901383054240.150.150.230.28o.se79.42o.s779.82o.1184.800.63191.720oF20oF-60oF60oF17oF17oF28oF56oFEQUIVALENTFLUENCE(23.6EFPY)ATTIMEOFREACHINGRT/NDTVALUESUSEDIN1SEFPYCURVESWITHGL92%1CHEMISTRYFACTORS/MARGINS(Ref.7.6)(Newcriticalvaluesbolded)LOCATIONLowershelllateLowershellIsteInttoLowerirthweldsLowerlongitudinalweldsID¹C-8-1C-8-29013B305424Cu%0.150.150.230.28Ni%0.5B0.570.110.63CALC.CFTABLECF79.4279.8284.80191.7INITIALRTndt20OF20oF60oF60oFMARGIN17oF17OF28OF56oF22KBEFPYPEAKFLUENCE,E18n/cm22.82E+192.82E+192.82E+191.783E+191/4TFLUENCE3/4TFLUENCE1.BBE+195.97E+181.68E+195.97E+181.68E+195.97E+181.063E+193.78E+1823.BEFPYART61/4T128oF128oF65oF191oF23.6EFPYART93/4T105OF105OF41OF136oF St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT3DETERMINATIONOFNOSIGNIFICANTHAZARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit,1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment3Page1of2DETERMINATIONOFNOSIGNIFICANTHAZARDSCONSIDERATIONPursuantto10CFR50.92,adeterminationmaybemadethataproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsiderationifoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnot:(1)involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(2)createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(3)involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussedasfollows:(1)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Thepressure-temperature(P/T)limitcurvesintheTechnicalSpecificationsareconservativelygeneratedinaccordancewiththefracturetoughnessrequirementsof10CFR50AppendixGassupplementedbytheASMECodeSectionXI,AppendixGrecommendations.TheRT>>~valuesarebasedonRegulatoryGuide1.99,Revision2,shiftpredictionandattenuationformula.AnalysesofreactorvesselmaterialirradiationsurveillancespecimensareusedtoverifythevalidityofthefluencepredictionsandtheP/Tlimitcurves.Useofthesecurvesinconjunctionwiththesurveillancespecimenprogramensuresthatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarywillbehaveinanon-brittlemannerandthatthepossibilityofrapidlypropagatingfractureisminimized.Basedontheuseofplantspecificmaterialdata,analysishasdemonstratedthatthecurrentP/Tlimitcurveswillremainconservativeforupto23.6EFPY.InconjunctionwithextendingtheapplicabilityoftheexistingP/Tlimitcurves,thelowtemperatureoverpressureprotection(LTOP)analysisfor15EFPYisalsoextended.TheLTOPanalysisconfirmsthatthecurrentsetpointsforthepower-operatedreliefvalves(PORVs)willprovidetheappropriateoverpressureprotectionatlowReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)temperatures.BecausetheP/Tlimitcurveshavenotchanged,theexistingLTOPvalueshavenotchanged,whichincludethePORVsetpoints,heatupandcooldownrates,anddisablingofnon-essentialcomponents. | | 1~2~3~4~5.6.7~8.9.USNRClettertoJ.H.Goldberg, "St.LucieUnit1-IssuanceofAmendment Re:PressureTemperature (P/T)LimitsandLowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)Analysis(TACNo.75386)",datedJunell,1990.(Amendment 104)(Notused)FPLlettertoUSNRC,L-89-408, "St.LucieUnit1,DocketNo.50-335,ProposedLicenseAmendment, P-TLimitsandLTOPAnalysis", |
| St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendmentRCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment3Page2of2Theproposedamendmentdoesnotchangetheconfigurationoroperationoftheplant,andassuranceisprovidedthatreactorvesselintegritywillbemaintained.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwillnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(2)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Byapplyingplantspecificdatainthedeterminationofcriticalvesselmateriallimits,theapplicabilityoftheexistingpressuretemperaturelimitsandLTOPrequirementscanbeextended.Thereisnochangeintheconfigurationoroperationofthefacilityasaresultoftheproposedamendment.Theamendmentdoesnotinvolvetheadditionofnewequipmentorthemodificationofexistingequipment,nordoesitalterthedesignofSt.Lucieplantsystems.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(3)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Analysishasdemonstratedthatthefracturetoughnessrequirementsof10CFR50AppendixGaresatisfiedandthatconservativeoperatingrestrictionsaremaintainedforthepurposeoflowtemperatureoverpressureprotection.TheP/TlimitcurveswillprovideassurancethattheRCSpressureboundarywillbehaveinaductilemannerandthattheprobabilityofarapidlypropagatingfractureisminimized.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.BasedonthediscussionpresentedaboveandonthesupportingEvaluationofProposedTSChanges,FPLhasconcludedthatthisproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsideration.}} | | datedDecember5,1989.FPLlettertoUSNRC,L-93-286, "St.LucieUnit1and2,DocketNo.50-335and50-389,GenericLetter92-01,Revision1,ResponsetoRequestforAdditional Information (RAI)",datedNovember15,1993.USNRCLettertoJ.H.Goldberg; GenericLetter(GL)92-01,Revision1,"ReactorVesselStructural Integrity," |
| | St.LucieUnit1and2(TACNOSM83505andM83506);May26,1994.FPLcalculation PSL-lFJM-95-004, Rev.0,"St.LucieUnit1ReactorVesselAdjustedReference Temperature andLTOPlimitsat23.6EFPY",dated3/22/95.USNRCGenericLetter92-01"ReactorVesselStructural Integrity", |
| | Revision1,DatedMarch6,1992.USNRCInformation Notice93-58"Non-conservatism inLow-Temperature Overpressure Protection forPressurized WaterReactors", |
| | datedJuly26,1993.CEReportTR-F-MCM-004 "FPL,PSL-1Evaluation ofIrradiated CapsuleW97",datedDecember, 1983. |
| | St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT 2TABLE1ST~LUCIEUNIT1REACTORVESSELBELTLINEADJUSTEDREFERENCE TEMPERATURES FORDETERMINING PRESSURETEMPERATURE ANDLTOPLIMITSCURVES TABLE1:STLUCIEUNIT1REACTORVESSELBELTLINEADJUSTEDREFERENCE TEMPERATURES FORDETERMINING PRESSURETEMPERATURE ANDLTOPLIMITSCURVES15YEARPT/LTOPCURVESUSINGEXISTING1989ANALYSIS(Original criticalvaluesbolded)LOCATIONID¹Cu%Ni%CALC.CFTABLECFINITIALRTndtMARGIN15EFPYPEAKFLUENCE,E19n/cm21/4TFLUENCE15YEARART15YEAR3/4TFLUENCE91/4TART93/4TLowershellsteLowershellsteInttoLowerirthweldsC-8-1C-8-2901360.150.150.230.560.570.11107.8108.4109.820OF20oF-60oF34OF34oF56oF2.05E+192.05E+192.05E+191.22E+191.22E+191.22E+194.34E+18168oF4.34E+181BBOF4.34E+18112OF137oF137OF80OFLowerlongitudinal welds3054240.30O.B4200.2-56oF65.5oF1.202E+197.16E+182.54E+18191F135oFNEWCHEMISTRY FACTORS5MARGINSBASEDONGL92-01VALUES(Changesresulting fromnewdatasubmitted withGL92-01anduseofcapsuledataforplatesbolded)LOCATIONID¹CU%CALC.CFTABLECFINITIALRTndtMARGINLowershellsteLowershellsteInttoLowerirthweldsLowerlongitudinal weldsC-8-1C-8-2901383054240.150.150.230.28o.se79.42o.s779.82o.1184.800.63191.720oF20oF-60oF60oF17oF17oF28oF56oFEQUIVALENT FLUENCE(23.6EFPY)ATTIMEOFREACHINGRT/NDTVALUESUSEDIN1SEFPYCURVESWITHGL92%1CHEMISTRY FACTORS/MARGINS (Ref.7.6)(Newcriticalvaluesbolded)LOCATIONLowershelllateLowershellIsteInttoLowerirthweldsLowerlongitudinal weldsID¹C-8-1C-8-29013B305424Cu%0.150.150.230.28Ni%0.5B0.570.110.63CALC.CFTABLECF79.4279.8284.80191.7INITIALRTndt20OF20oF60oF60oFMARGIN17oF17OF28OF56oF22KBEFPYPEAKFLUENCE,E18n/cm22.82E+192.82E+192.82E+191.783E+191/4TFLUENCE3/4TFLUENCE1.BBE+195.97E+181.68E+195.97E+181.68E+195.97E+181.063E+193.78E+1823.BEFPYART61/4T128oF128oF65oF191oF23.6EFPYART93/4T105OF105OF41OF136oF St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT 3DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit,1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 3Page1of2DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION Pursuantto10CFR50.92, adetermination maybemadethataproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration ifoperation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussed asfollows:(1)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated. |
| | Thepressure-temperature (P/T)limitcurvesintheTechnical Specifications areconservatively generated inaccordance withthefracturetoughness requirements of10CFR50AppendixGassupplemented bytheASMECodeSectionXI,AppendixGrecommendations. |
| | TheRT>>~valuesarebasedonRegulatory Guide1.99,Revision2,shiftprediction andattenuation formula.Analysesofreactorvesselmaterialirradiation surveillance specimens areusedtoverifythevalidityofthefluencepredictions andtheP/Tlimitcurves.Useofthesecurvesinconjunction withthesurveillance specimenprogramensuresthatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarywillbehaveinanon-brittle mannerandthatthepossibility ofrapidlypropagating fractureisminimized. |
| | Basedontheuseofplantspecificmaterialdata,analysishasdemonstrated thatthecurrentP/Tlimitcurveswillremainconservative forupto23.6EFPY.Inconjunction withextending theapplicability oftheexistingP/Tlimitcurves,thelowtemperature overpressure protection (LTOP)analysisfor15EFPYisalsoextended. |
| | TheLTOPanalysisconfirmsthatthecurrentsetpoints forthepower-operated reliefvalves(PORVs)willprovidetheappropriate overpressure protection atlowReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)temperatures. |
| | BecausetheP/Tlimitcurveshavenotchanged,theexistingLTOPvalueshavenotchanged,whichincludethePORVsetpoints, heatupandcooldownrates,anddisabling ofnon-essential components. |
| | St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 3Page2of2Theproposedamendment doesnotchangetheconfiguration oroperation oftheplant,andassurance isprovidedthatreactorvesselintegrity willbemaintained. |
| | Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment willnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated. |
| | (2)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. |
| | Byapplyingplantspecificdatainthedetermination ofcriticalvesselmateriallimits,theapplicability oftheexistingpressuretemperature limitsandLTOPrequirements canbeextended. |
| | Thereisnochangeintheconfiguration oroperation ofthefacilityasaresultoftheproposedamendment. |
| | Theamendment doesnotinvolvetheadditionofnewequipment orthemodification ofexistingequipment, nordoesitalterthedesignofSt.Lucieplantsystems.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. |
| | (3)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Analysishasdemonstrated thatthefracturetoughness requirements of10CFR50AppendixGaresatisfied andthatconservative operating restrictions aremaintained forthepurposeoflowtemperature overpressure protection. |
| | TheP/Tlimitcurveswillprovideassurance thattheRCSpressureboundarywillbehaveinaductilemannerandthattheprobability ofarapidlypropagating fractureisminimized. |
| | Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedonthediscussion presented aboveandonthesupporting Evaluation ofProposedTSChanges,FPLhasconcluded thatthisproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration.}} |
|
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARL-99-146, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,to Change Required Surveillance Frequency for Cycling Steam Valves in Turbine Overspeed Protection Sys from Once Per Month to Once Per Quarter (92 Days).Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-08-18018 August 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,to Change Required Surveillance Frequency for Cycling Steam Valves in Turbine Overspeed Protection Sys from Once Per Month to Once Per Quarter (92 Days).Proprietary Encls Withheld L-99-079, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 3.5.2 to Allow Up to 7 Days to Restore Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status1999-06-0101 June 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 3.5.2 to Allow Up to 7 Days to Restore Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status L-99-099, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Unit 2 TS 3/4.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks, by Clarifying Nonconservative Wording of Surveillance 4.5.1.1.d.1 to Align Surveillance with Intent & Design Bases Requirements1999-05-24024 May 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Unit 2 TS 3/4.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks, by Clarifying Nonconservative Wording of Surveillance 4.5.1.1.d.1 to Align Surveillance with Intent & Design Bases Requirements L-99-010, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Redundant Concentration Monitoring Requirements Specified for Modes 3 Through 6 by Deleting TS 3/4.1.2.9, Reactivity Control Sys- Boron Dilution1999-02-23023 February 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Redundant Concentration Monitoring Requirements Specified for Modes 3 Through 6 by Deleting TS 3/4.1.2.9, Reactivity Control Sys- Boron Dilution L-98-308, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Index Page Iii,Ts 1.10,TS 2.1.1.2,Bases 2.1.1,Bases Figure B2.1-1,Bases 2.2.1,TS 3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1,TS 3/4.1.1.2,TS 3.1.2.2,TS 3.1.2.4,TS 3.1.2.6,TS 3.1.2.8 & Bases 3/4.1.1.1.Rept Encl1998-12-18018 December 1998 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Index Page Iii,Ts 1.10,TS 2.1.1.2,Bases 2.1.1,Bases Figure B2.1-1,Bases 2.2.1,TS 3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1,TS 3/4.1.1.2,TS 3.1.2.2,TS 3.1.2.4,TS 3.1.2.6,TS 3.1.2.8 & Bases 3/4.1.1.1.Rept Encl L-98-279, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Administrative Controls TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi- Discipline Supervisor Position1998-12-16016 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Administrative Controls TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi- Discipline Supervisor Position L-98-283, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,revising Thermal Margin SL Lines of TS Figure 2.1-1 to Reflect Increase in Value of Design Min RCS Flow from 345,000 Gpm to 365,000 Gpm & Change Flow Rates Stated in Tables 2.2-1 & 3.2-11998-11-22022 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,revising Thermal Margin SL Lines of TS Figure 2.1-1 to Reflect Increase in Value of Design Min RCS Flow from 345,000 Gpm to 365,000 Gpm & Change Flow Rates Stated in Tables 2.2-1 & 3.2-1 ML17229A9111998-11-19019 November 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Administrative Controls TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporate Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi-Discipline Supervisor (MDS) Position L-98-211, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,removing Obsolete License Conditions & Incorporating Attached TS Revs1998-08-24024 August 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,removing Obsolete License Conditions & Incorporating Attached TS Revs L-98-125, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 to Incorporate Attached TS Revs.Proposed Amends Are Administrative in Nature & Will Modify Explosive Gas Mixture Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.5.11998-06-0303 June 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 to Incorporate Attached TS Revs.Proposed Amends Are Administrative in Nature & Will Modify Explosive Gas Mixture Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.5.1 L-98-115, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Requirement for SITs to Be Operable in Mode 4,which Will Minimize Potential for Inadvertent SIT Discharge During RCS Cooldown/ Depressurization Evolutions1998-05-27027 May 1998 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Requirement for SITs to Be Operable in Mode 4,which Will Minimize Potential for Inadvertent SIT Discharge During RCS Cooldown/ Depressurization Evolutions L-98-130, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 6.2.2.f to Allow Use of Longer Operating Shifts of Up to Twelve Hours Duration by Plants Operating Crews1998-05-27027 May 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 6.2.2.f to Allow Use of Longer Operating Shifts of Up to Twelve Hours Duration by Plants Operating Crews L-98-072, Supplemental Application to 961031 Proposed Amend to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,providing for More Efficient Use of on-site Mgt Personnel in Review & Approval Process for Plant Procedures1998-05-27027 May 1998 Supplemental Application to 961031 Proposed Amend to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,providing for More Efficient Use of on-site Mgt Personnel in Review & Approval Process for Plant Procedures L-98-031, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Applicability of TS 3.4.7 Re RCS Chemistry,Consistent W/ Corresponding Specification for Unit 11998-03-0303 March 1998 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Applicability of TS 3.4.7 Re RCS Chemistry,Consistent W/ Corresponding Specification for Unit 1 L-97-325, Application for Amend to License NPF-16 by Incorporating Attached TS Rev.Amend Will Modify TS 5.6.1 & Associated Figure 5.6-1 & TS 5.6.3 to Accomodate Increase in Allowed SFP Storage Capacity1997-12-31031 December 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-16 by Incorporating Attached TS Rev.Amend Will Modify TS 5.6.1 & Associated Figure 5.6-1 & TS 5.6.3 to Accomodate Increase in Allowed SFP Storage Capacity L-97-280, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Provide Reference to St Lucie Unit 2 COLR for Limiting Values1997-12-29029 December 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Provide Reference to St Lucie Unit 2 COLR for Limiting Values L-97-296, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising EPP Section 4, Environ Conditions & Section 5, Administrative Procedures, to Incorporate Proposed Terms & Conditions of Incidental Take Statement1997-12-0101 December 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising EPP Section 4, Environ Conditions & Section 5, Administrative Procedures, to Incorporate Proposed Terms & Conditions of Incidental Take Statement L-97-215, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Specification 4.0.5,Surveillance Requirements for ISI & Testing of ASME Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components,To Relocate IST Program Requirements to Administrative Controls Section1997-08-22022 August 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Specification 4.0.5,Surveillance Requirements for ISI & Testing of ASME Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components,To Relocate IST Program Requirements to Administrative Controls Section L-97-191, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,extending semi- Annual Surveillance Interval Specified in Table 4.3-2 for Testing ESFAS Subgroup Relays to Interval Consistent W/Ceog Rept CEN-403,Rev 1-A for March 19961997-08-0101 August 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,extending semi- Annual Surveillance Interval Specified in Table 4.3-2 for Testing ESFAS Subgroup Relays to Interval Consistent W/Ceog Rept CEN-403,Rev 1-A for March 1996 L-97-158, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,incorporating Recent Evaluation of Postulated Inadvertent Opening of MSSV Into Current Licensing Basis1997-07-22022 July 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,incorporating Recent Evaluation of Postulated Inadvertent Opening of MSSV Into Current Licensing Basis L-97-134, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Incorporating Administrative Changes That Will Improve Consistency Throughout TSs & Related Bases1997-05-29029 May 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Incorporating Administrative Changes That Will Improve Consistency Throughout TSs & Related Bases L-96-333, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Deletion of Footnote Re TS 2.1.1, Reactor Core Safety Limits1996-12-20020 December 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Deletion of Footnote Re TS 2.1.1, Reactor Core Safety Limits L-96-298, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Mod for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Refer to COLR for Limiting Values1996-12-0909 December 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Mod for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Refer to COLR for Limiting Values L-96-256, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting Revisions to 6.5.1 Re Facility Review Group & 6.8 Re Procedures & Programs1996-10-31031 October 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting Revisions to 6.5.1 Re Facility Review Group & 6.8 Re Procedures & Programs L-96-222, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting to Revise TS 3/4.9.9 Re Refueling Requirements & TS 3/4.9.10 Re Refueling Operations,Water level-reactor Vessel1996-10-30030 October 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting to Revise TS 3/4.9.9 Re Refueling Requirements & TS 3/4.9.10 Re Refueling Operations,Water level-reactor Vessel L-96-244, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria1996-10-28028 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria L-96-245, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B,To Revise TS to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria1996-10-28028 October 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B,To Revise TS to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria ML17228B5621996-07-15015 July 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 Revising Core Alteration Definition L-96-141, Application for Exigent Amend to License DPR-67,revising TS Re Thermal Margin & RCS Flow Limits.Siemens Power Corp Rept EMF-96-135, St Lucie Unit 1 Chapter 15 Event Review & Analysis for 30% SG Tube Plugging Encl1996-06-0101 June 1996 Application for Exigent Amend to License DPR-67,revising TS Re Thermal Margin & RCS Flow Limits.Siemens Power Corp Rept EMF-96-135, St Lucie Unit 1 Chapter 15 Event Review & Analysis for 30% SG Tube Plugging Encl L-95-327, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 Revising TS 3.5.3 to Rectify Discrepancy for Each St Lucie Unit & to Provide Assurance That Admin Controls for Hpsip Remain Effective in Lower Operational Modes1996-01-0404 January 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 Revising TS 3.5.3 to Rectify Discrepancy for Each St Lucie Unit & to Provide Assurance That Admin Controls for Hpsip Remain Effective in Lower Operational Modes L-95-228, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,amending TS 3/4.4.6.1 for RCS Leakage Detection Instrumentation by Adapting STS for C-E Plants (NUREG-1432),Spec 3.4.15 for Facilities1995-11-22022 November 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,amending TS 3/4.4.6.1 for RCS Leakage Detection Instrumentation by Adapting STS for C-E Plants (NUREG-1432),Spec 3.4.15 for Facilities L-95-246, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,removing SR Re Dune & Mangrove Surveys from TS1995-10-0505 October 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,removing SR Re Dune & Mangrove Surveys from TS L-95-233, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Relocating Selected TS Requirements Re Instrumentation,Per Final Policy Statement on TS Improvements & Relocating TS Re Emergency & Security Plan Review Process Per GL 93-071995-08-16016 August 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Relocating Selected TS Requirements Re Instrumentation,Per Final Policy Statement on TS Improvements & Relocating TS Re Emergency & Security Plan Review Process Per GL 93-07 L-95-215, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Spec 3.6.6.1, Sbvs to More Effectively Address Design Functions Performed by Sbvs for Shield Bldg & Fuel Handling Bldg,Per NUREG-14321995-08-16016 August 1995 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Spec 3.6.6.1, Sbvs to More Effectively Address Design Functions Performed by Sbvs for Shield Bldg & Fuel Handling Bldg,Per NUREG-1432 L-95-148, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDGs1995-06-21021 June 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Extend Allowed Outage Time for Inoperable EDGs L-95-134, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Revise Action Statements & Certain Surveillances of TS 3/4.5.1 Re Safety Injection Tanks1995-06-21021 June 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Revise Action Statements & Certain Surveillances of TS 3/4.5.1 Re Safety Injection Tanks L-95-133, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Allow Up to Seven Days to Restore an Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status1995-06-21021 June 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Allow Up to Seven Days to Restore an Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status L-95-140, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 Re Administrative & Conforming Update1995-05-17017 May 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 Re Administrative & Conforming Update L-95-139, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,extending Applicability of Current RCS Pressure/Temp Limits & Maximum Allowed RCS Heatup & Cooldown Rates to 23.6 Effective Full Power Yrs of Operation1995-05-17017 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,extending Applicability of Current RCS Pressure/Temp Limits & Maximum Allowed RCS Heatup & Cooldown Rates to 23.6 Effective Full Power Yrs of Operation L-95-087, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Incorporate line-item TS Improvements to TSs 3/4.8.1 & 4.8.1.2.21995-04-0303 April 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16.Amends Would Incorporate line-item TS Improvements to TSs 3/4.8.1 & 4.8.1.2.2 L-95-042, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Surveillance Requirement 4.9.8.1 & 4.9.8.2 to Allow Reduction in Required Min Shutdown Cooling Flow Rate Under Certain Conditions During Operational Mode 61995-02-27027 February 1995 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Surveillance Requirement 4.9.8.1 & 4.9.8.2 to Allow Reduction in Required Min Shutdown Cooling Flow Rate Under Certain Conditions During Operational Mode 6 L-95-054, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising TS Tables 3.3-3 & 3.3-4 to Accommodate Improved Coincidence Logic & Relay Replacement for 4.16 Kv Loss of Voltage Relay1995-02-27027 February 1995 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising TS Tables 3.3-3 & 3.3-4 to Accommodate Improved Coincidence Logic & Relay Replacement for 4.16 Kv Loss of Voltage Relay L-95-040, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,deleting Refs to Automatic Tester for Containment Personnel Air Lock from TS 4.6.1.31995-02-22022 February 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,deleting Refs to Automatic Tester for Containment Personnel Air Lock from TS 4.6.1.3 L-95-004, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Relocating Operability Requirements for Incore Detectors (TS 3/4.3.3.2) to Updated FSAR & Revising Lhr Surveillance 4.2.1.4 & Special Test Exceptions Surveillances1995-01-20020 January 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Relocating Operability Requirements for Incore Detectors (TS 3/4.3.3.2) to Updated FSAR & Revising Lhr Surveillance 4.2.1.4 & Special Test Exceptions Surveillances L-95-006, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-31 & DPR-41,revising TS 6.9.1.7, COLR, Re Implementation of FPL Nuclear Physics Methodology for Calculations of COLR Parameters.Fpl Topical Rept NF-TR-95-01, Nuclear Physics Methodology... Encl1995-01-17017 January 1995 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-31 & DPR-41,revising TS 6.9.1.7, COLR, Re Implementation of FPL Nuclear Physics Methodology for Calculations of COLR Parameters.Fpl Topical Rept NF-TR-95-01, Nuclear Physics Methodology... Encl L-94-260, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,upgrading TS 3/4.6.2.1 & 3/4.6.2.3 by Adapting Combined Spec for Containment Spray & Cooling Sys Contained in Std TS for C-E Plants1994-11-0202 November 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,upgrading TS 3/4.6.2.1 & 3/4.6.2.3 by Adapting Combined Spec for Containment Spray & Cooling Sys Contained in Std TS for C-E Plants L-94-198, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Incorporating Encl Administrative Changes1994-10-27027 October 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Incorporating Encl Administrative Changes L-94-153, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67,revising TS 3/4.4.13 to Incorporate LTOP Requirements Similar to LTOP Requirements Recommended by NRC Via GL 90-06,in Accordance W/Resolution of Generic Issue 941994-07-28028 July 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67,revising TS 3/4.4.13 to Incorporate LTOP Requirements Similar to LTOP Requirements Recommended by NRC Via GL 90-06,in Accordance W/Resolution of Generic Issue 94 L-94-191, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Ts,Implementing Enhancements Recommended by GL 93-05 Re line-item TS Improvements to Reduce SR for Testing During Power Operation1994-07-25025 July 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Ts,Implementing Enhancements Recommended by GL 93-05 Re line-item TS Improvements to Reduce SR for Testing During Power Operation ML17228A6571994-07-25025 July 1994 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Ts,Implementing Enhancements Recommended by GL 93-05 Re line-item TS Improvements to Reduce SR for Testing During Power Operation. 1999-08-18
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARML17241A4781999-10-0404 October 1999 Amend 104 to License NPF-16,removing Redundant Boron Concentration Monitoring Requirements Specified for Modes 3-6 Contained in TS 3/4.1.2.9,accomplished by Deleting TS 3/4.1.2.9 L-99-146, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,to Change Required Surveillance Frequency for Cycling Steam Valves in Turbine Overspeed Protection Sys from Once Per Month to Once Per Quarter (92 Days).Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-08-18018 August 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,to Change Required Surveillance Frequency for Cycling Steam Valves in Turbine Overspeed Protection Sys from Once Per Month to Once Per Quarter (92 Days).Proprietary Encls Withheld ML17241A4051999-07-0202 July 1999 Amends 162 & 103 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Consisting of Changes to App B, Environ Protection Plan Non-Radiological) of TS L-99-079, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 3.5.2 to Allow Up to 7 Days to Restore Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status1999-06-0101 June 1999 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 3.5.2 to Allow Up to 7 Days to Restore Inoperable LPSI Train to Operable Status L-99-099, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Unit 2 TS 3/4.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks, by Clarifying Nonconservative Wording of Surveillance 4.5.1.1.d.1 to Align Surveillance with Intent & Design Bases Requirements1999-05-24024 May 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Unit 2 TS 3/4.5.1, Safety Injection Tanks, by Clarifying Nonconservative Wording of Surveillance 4.5.1.1.d.1 to Align Surveillance with Intent & Design Bases Requirements ML17241A3981999-05-21021 May 1999 Draft Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,consisting of Changes to App B (App B,Part II for Unit 1), Environ Protection Plan (Non-Radiological), of TSs in Response to Application & Suppl ML17241A3241999-05-0606 May 1999 Amend 101 to License NPF-16,modifying Plant,Unit 2 TS to Increase Capacity of Sfsp,In Part,By Allowing Credit for Certain Soluble Boron Concentration in SFP ML17229B0921999-04-0808 April 1999 Amend 100 to License NPF-16,changing Unit 2 TS Section 3/4.5.1, SIT, by Deleting Applicability Requirement for Mode 4 from Limiting Condition for Operation & Modifying Associated Note Accordingly ML17229B0591999-03-17017 March 1999 Amends 160 & 99 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Changing TSs to Modify Plant,Unit 1 TSs to Add Components Not Previously Described in TSs L-99-010, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Redundant Concentration Monitoring Requirements Specified for Modes 3 Through 6 by Deleting TS 3/4.1.2.9, Reactivity Control Sys- Boron Dilution1999-02-23023 February 1999 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Redundant Concentration Monitoring Requirements Specified for Modes 3 Through 6 by Deleting TS 3/4.1.2.9, Reactivity Control Sys- Boron Dilution ML17229A9791999-01-0505 January 1999 Amend 159 to License DPR-67,revising Table 2.2-1 Notations in TS Section 2.2.1,Reactor Trip Setpoints L-98-308, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Index Page Iii,Ts 1.10,TS 2.1.1.2,Bases 2.1.1,Bases Figure B2.1-1,Bases 2.2.1,TS 3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1,TS 3/4.1.1.2,TS 3.1.2.2,TS 3.1.2.4,TS 3.1.2.6,TS 3.1.2.8 & Bases 3/4.1.1.1.Rept Encl1998-12-18018 December 1998 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Index Page Iii,Ts 1.10,TS 2.1.1.2,Bases 2.1.1,Bases Figure B2.1-1,Bases 2.2.1,TS 3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1,TS 3/4.1.1.2,TS 3.1.2.2,TS 3.1.2.4,TS 3.1.2.6,TS 3.1.2.8 & Bases 3/4.1.1.1.Rept Encl L-98-279, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Administrative Controls TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi- Discipline Supervisor Position1998-12-16016 December 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Administrative Controls TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporating Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi- Discipline Supervisor Position ML17229A9191998-11-24024 November 1998 Amend 98 to License NPF-16,revising Table 2.2-1 Notations in TS Section 2.2.1 & Table 3.3-1 Notations in TS Section 3/4.3.1,by Replacing Term Thermal Power with Explicit Parameters Based on Output of Excore Neutron Flux Monitors L-98-283, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,revising Thermal Margin SL Lines of TS Figure 2.1-1 to Reflect Increase in Value of Design Min RCS Flow from 345,000 Gpm to 365,000 Gpm & Change Flow Rates Stated in Tables 2.2-1 & 3.2-11998-11-22022 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,revising Thermal Margin SL Lines of TS Figure 2.1-1 to Reflect Increase in Value of Design Min RCS Flow from 345,000 Gpm to 365,000 Gpm & Change Flow Rates Stated in Tables 2.2-1 & 3.2-1 ML17229A9111998-11-19019 November 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Administrative Controls TS 6.3, Unit Staff Qualifications & Incorporate Specific Staff Qualifications for Multi-Discipline Supervisor (MDS) Position ML17229A8801998-10-16016 October 1998 Amends 158 & 97 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-97,respectively, Revising Administrative Control Specifications to Reduce Administrative Burden Carried by Facility Review Group ML17229A8841998-10-16016 October 1998 Amends 157 & 96 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Revising TS Action Statements & Certain SRs of TS 3/4.5.1, Sits L-98-211, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,removing Obsolete License Conditions & Incorporating Attached TS Revs1998-08-24024 August 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,removing Obsolete License Conditions & Incorporating Attached TS Revs ML17229A8371998-08-18018 August 1998 Amend 95 to License NPF-16,revising TS 3.4.7, RCS-Chemistry, TS 5.6.1.a.1, Design Features-Fuel Storage Criticality & TS 6.5.2.9.d, Technical Review Responsibilities ML17229A8341998-08-10010 August 1998 Amends 156 & 94 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Revising Surveillance Requirements of TS Section 4.11.2.5.1, Explosive Gas Mixture, to Add Ref to UFSAR for Clarification of Alternative Monitoring Method ML17229A8251998-07-30030 July 1998 Amends 155 & 93 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Revising Administrative Controls,Unit Staff Section 6.2.2.f of TS to Authorize Use of Various Controlled Shift Structures & Durations During Nominal Work Wk ML17229A8221998-07-24024 July 1998 Amend 92 to License NPF-16,modifying TSs for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Refer to St Lucie Unit 2 Core Operating Limits Rept for Limiting Values L-98-125, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 to Incorporate Attached TS Revs.Proposed Amends Are Administrative in Nature & Will Modify Explosive Gas Mixture Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.5.11998-06-0303 June 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16 to Incorporate Attached TS Revs.Proposed Amends Are Administrative in Nature & Will Modify Explosive Gas Mixture Surveillance Requirement 4.11.2.5.1 L-98-072, Supplemental Application to 961031 Proposed Amend to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,providing for More Efficient Use of on-site Mgt Personnel in Review & Approval Process for Plant Procedures1998-05-27027 May 1998 Supplemental Application to 961031 Proposed Amend to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,providing for More Efficient Use of on-site Mgt Personnel in Review & Approval Process for Plant Procedures L-98-130, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 6.2.2.f to Allow Use of Longer Operating Shifts of Up to Twelve Hours Duration by Plants Operating Crews1998-05-27027 May 1998 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising TS 6.2.2.f to Allow Use of Longer Operating Shifts of Up to Twelve Hours Duration by Plants Operating Crews L-98-115, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Requirement for SITs to Be Operable in Mode 4,which Will Minimize Potential for Inadvertent SIT Discharge During RCS Cooldown/ Depressurization Evolutions1998-05-27027 May 1998 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,removing Requirement for SITs to Be Operable in Mode 4,which Will Minimize Potential for Inadvertent SIT Discharge During RCS Cooldown/ Depressurization Evolutions ML17229A7341998-05-0101 May 1998 Corrected Tech Spec Pages to Amends 153 & 91 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively,correcting Clerical Errors Inadvertently Incorporated During Retyping Process ML17229A7131998-04-30030 April 1998 Amend 154 to License DPR-67,changes UFSAR Evaluation of Main Steam Safety Valve Inadvertent Opening L-98-031, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Applicability of TS 3.4.7 Re RCS Chemistry,Consistent W/ Corresponding Specification for Unit 11998-03-0303 March 1998 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,revising Applicability of TS 3.4.7 Re RCS Chemistry,Consistent W/ Corresponding Specification for Unit 1 ML17229A6571998-02-25025 February 1998 Amends 153 & 91 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Relocating Inservice Testing Program Requirements from TS 4.0.5 to Administrative Controls Section in Units 1 & 2 TS L-97-325, Application for Amend to License NPF-16 by Incorporating Attached TS Rev.Amend Will Modify TS 5.6.1 & Associated Figure 5.6-1 & TS 5.6.3 to Accomodate Increase in Allowed SFP Storage Capacity1997-12-31031 December 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-16 by Incorporating Attached TS Rev.Amend Will Modify TS 5.6.1 & Associated Figure 5.6-1 & TS 5.6.3 to Accomodate Increase in Allowed SFP Storage Capacity L-97-280, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Provide Reference to St Lucie Unit 2 COLR for Limiting Values1997-12-29029 December 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Provide Reference to St Lucie Unit 2 COLR for Limiting Values L-97-296, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising EPP Section 4, Environ Conditions & Section 5, Administrative Procedures, to Incorporate Proposed Terms & Conditions of Incidental Take Statement1997-12-0101 December 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising EPP Section 4, Environ Conditions & Section 5, Administrative Procedures, to Incorporate Proposed Terms & Conditions of Incidental Take Statement ML17229A4911997-10-0202 October 1997 Amend 90 to License NPF-16,changing TSs in Response to 970801 Application Re Extending Surveillance Interval for ESFAS to Refueling Interval on Staggered Test Basis ML17229A4811997-09-22022 September 1997 Amends 152 & 89 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Consisting of Changes to TS in Response to 970529 Application Re Removing Outdated Matl & Incorporating Minor Changes in Text L-97-215, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Specification 4.0.5,Surveillance Requirements for ISI & Testing of ASME Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components,To Relocate IST Program Requirements to Administrative Controls Section1997-08-22022 August 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,revising Specification 4.0.5,Surveillance Requirements for ISI & Testing of ASME Code Class 1,2 & 3 Components,To Relocate IST Program Requirements to Administrative Controls Section L-97-191, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,extending semi- Annual Surveillance Interval Specified in Table 4.3-2 for Testing ESFAS Subgroup Relays to Interval Consistent W/Ceog Rept CEN-403,Rev 1-A for March 19961997-08-0101 August 1997 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,extending semi- Annual Surveillance Interval Specified in Table 4.3-2 for Testing ESFAS Subgroup Relays to Interval Consistent W/Ceog Rept CEN-403,Rev 1-A for March 1996 L-97-158, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,incorporating Recent Evaluation of Postulated Inadvertent Opening of MSSV Into Current Licensing Basis1997-07-22022 July 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,incorporating Recent Evaluation of Postulated Inadvertent Opening of MSSV Into Current Licensing Basis L-97-134, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Incorporating Administrative Changes That Will Improve Consistency Throughout TSs & Related Bases1997-05-29029 May 1997 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Incorporating Administrative Changes That Will Improve Consistency Throughout TSs & Related Bases ML17229A3411997-05-16016 May 1997 Amend 151 to License DPR-67,deleting Footnote Which Requires Reactor Thermal Power to Be Limited to 90% of 2700 Megawatts Thermal for Cycle 14 Operation Beyond 7000 Effective Full Power Hours ML17229A2881997-04-0101 April 1997 Amend 150 to License DPR-67,modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Refer to Facility Core Operating Limits Rept for Limiting Values ML17229A2311997-02-10010 February 1997 Amends 149 & 88 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Consisting of Changes to TSs in Response to 961028 Applications for Units 1 & 2 Re Containment Leakage Tests & Removal of Certain Component Lists from TS ML17229A2251997-02-10010 February 1997 Amends 148 & 87 to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16,respectively, Revising Plant TSs to Remove Inconsistencies Between Definition of Core Alterations & Applicability,Action & SRs of Two Specs L-96-333, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Deletion of Footnote Re TS 2.1.1, Reactor Core Safety Limits1996-12-20020 December 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Deletion of Footnote Re TS 2.1.1, Reactor Core Safety Limits L-96-298, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Mod for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Refer to COLR for Limiting Values1996-12-0909 December 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting Mod for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Refer to COLR for Limiting Values L-96-256, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting Revisions to 6.5.1 Re Facility Review Group & 6.8 Re Procedures & Programs1996-10-31031 October 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting Revisions to 6.5.1 Re Facility Review Group & 6.8 Re Procedures & Programs L-96-222, Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting to Revise TS 3/4.9.9 Re Refueling Requirements & TS 3/4.9.10 Re Refueling Operations,Water level-reactor Vessel1996-10-30030 October 1996 Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-67 & NPF-16, Requesting to Revise TS 3/4.9.9 Re Refueling Requirements & TS 3/4.9.10 Re Refueling Operations,Water level-reactor Vessel L-96-244, Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria1996-10-28028 October 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-67,requesting to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria L-96-245, Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B,To Revise TS to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria1996-10-28028 October 1996 Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying TS to Implement 10CFR50,App J,Option B,To Revise TS to Allow Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Tests to Be Conducted at Extended Intervals Determined by performance-based Criteria 1999-08-18
[Table view] |
Text
PRIDRITY1CCELERATEDRIDSPROCESSIVEG)REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9505240223 DOC.DATE:
95/05/17NOTARIZED:
NOFACXL:50-335 St.LuciePlant,Unit1,FloridaPower&LightCo.AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION SAGER,D.A.
FloridaPower&LightCo.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)DOCKET05000335
SUBJECT:
Application foramendtolicenseDPR-67,extending applicability ofcurrentRCSpressure/temp limits&maximumallowedRCSheatup&cooldownratesto23.6Effective FullPowerYRsofoperation.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:AOOIDCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR
/ENCL/SIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:
GeneralDistribution NOTES:RECIPIENT XDCODE/NAME PD2-1LANORRIS,JINTERNAL:
ACRSNRR/DE/EMCB NRR/DSSA/SPLBNUDOCS-ABSTRACT EXTERNAL:
NOACCOPIESLTTRENCL11116611111111RECXPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD2-1PDFILECENTER01B'NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS3NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL111111111011NOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEiVKSTE!CONTAC'II'IIEDOCL'ifENTCONTROLDESk,ROOAfPl-37(EAT.504-0033)TOELIXIINKTEYOL'RNAifL'ROifDISTRIBUTION LIS'I'SI'ORDOCLMEN'I'SYOL'ON"I'lI'.D!TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR.18ENCL17 FloridaPower&LightCompany,P.O.Box128,FortPierce,FL34954-0128 May17,1995L-95-13910CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsPursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1byincorporating theattachedTechnical Specifications (TS)revisions.
Theamendment willextendtheapplicability ofthecurrentReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)Pressure/Temperature LimitsandmaximumallowedRCSheatupandcooldownratesto23.6Effective FullPowerYearsofoperation.
Inaddition, administrative changesareproposedforTS3.1.2.1(Boration SystemsFlowPaths-Shutdown) andTS3.1.2.3(Charging Pump-Shutdown) toclarifytheconditions forwhichaHighPressureSafetyInjection pumpmaybeused.Itisrequested thattheproposedamendment, ifapproved, beissuedbyMarch31,1996.Attachment 1isanevaluation oftheproposedTSchanges.Attachment 2isatableofSt.LucieUnit1ReactorVesselBeltlineAdjustedReference Temperatures forDetermining PressureTemperature andLTOPLimitsCurves.Attachment 3isthe"Determination ofNoSignificant HazardsConsideration."
Attachment 4containsacopyoftheappropriate TSpagesmarked-up toshowtheproposedchanges.Theproposedamendment hasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower&LightCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordance with10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyoftheproposedamendment isbeingforwarded totheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestions aboutthissubmittal.
Verytrulyyours,D.A.aerVicePidentSt.LucePlantanFPLGroupcompany Ig~4 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Page2DAS/RLDAttachments cc:StewartD.Ebneter,RegionalAdministrator, RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti, FloridaDepartment ofHealthandRehabilitative Services.
St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~D.A.Sagerbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident, St.LuciePlantfortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower6LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoing documenti thatthestatements madeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge, information andbelief,andthatheisauthorized toexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.
D.A.SerSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOFTheforegoing instrument wasacknowledged beforemethisIt~dayof,19'yD.A.Sager,whoispersonalyknowntomeandwhodidtakeanoath.NameofNotaryPublicMyCommission expiresSCommission No.2)Gal1S0~I'yOFFICIALNOTARySEALQy8~<)ALEXISRMOLENDA~COMMISSION NIIMSSRCC156115yCOMMISSION pXIsocT.ggqgg5 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT 1EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES 1cSt.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemerature.LimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page1of8EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroduction FloridaPowerandLightCompany(FPL)proposestochangetheSt.LucieUnit1Technical Specifications (TS)forReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)Pressure/Temperature LimitsandmaximumallowedRCSheatupandcooldownrates.Theapplicability oftheexistingspecified limitswillbeextendedfrom15Effective FullPowerYears(EFPY)to23.6EFPYofoperation.
Theassociated LowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)requirements willlikewisebeextended.
Inaddition, administrative changesareproposedforTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3toclarifytheconditions requiredifaHighPressureSafetyInjection (HPSI)pumpisusedtoestablish aborationflowpathduringoperational Modes5and6.DescritionofChanesMarked-up copiesoftheaffectedTSpagesarecontained inAttachment 4.Adescription oftheproposedchangesfollows:1~TS3.4.9.1currently providesthepressureandtemperature limitsintermsofFigures3.4-2a,3.4-2b,and3.4-3fortheRCS(exceptthepressurizer) duringheatup,cooldown, criticality, andinservice leakandhydrostatic testingfor15EFPY.Theproposedamendment wouldusetheseexistingfigures,as-is,andonlyrevisethetitlebychanging"15EFPYttto>t236EFPY2~3~Footnote"*"isappendedtoTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3,applicable duringModes5and6,toproviderequirements thatmustbemetiftheborationflowpathfromtheRefueling WaterTank(RWT)isestablished viaasingleHPSIpump.Thisfootnotewillberevisedtomoreclearlyindicatethatthespecified requirements applytothecondition whennochargingpumpsareoperable.
Figure3.1-lbspecifies themaximumallowable heatupandcooldownratesforthecasewhereasingleHPSIpumpisinoperation pursuanttoTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3.Thelimitofapplicability forthisfigurewillbeindicated byadding"23.6EFPY"tothetitle.
St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page2of8BackroundThereactorcoolantpressureboundaryisdesignedpursuantto10CFRPart50,AppendixA,DesignCriteria14and31.Thesedesigncriteriarequirethatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarybedesigned, fabricated, erectedandtestedinordertohaveanextremely lowprobability ofabnormalleakage,ofrapidlypropagating failure,andofgrossrupture.Thecriteriaalsorequirethatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarybedesignedwithsufficient margintoassurethat,whenstressed, theboundarybehavesinanon-brittle manner,andthattheprobability ofrapidlypropagating fractureisminimized.
Pressure/Temperature (P/T)limitsaredeveloped toprovideadequatesafetymarginsfortheprevention offractureoftheRCScoolantpressureboundarypursuantto10CFR50,AppendixG,"Fracture Toughness Requirements."
TheASMECodeformsthebasisfortheserequirements.
Themethodtopredictthereactorvesselmaterialirradiation damageisprovidedinUSNRCRegulatory Guide(RG)1.99,Rev.2,"Radiation Embrittlement ofReactorVesselMaterials".
TheexistingP/Tlimitswereimplemented in1990,andarebasedonpredictions forupto15EFPYofreactoroperation.
Itisanticipated thatPSL1willachieve15EFPYofoperation duringthespringof1996.FPLrecalculated thepredicted materialradiation damagebasedonrecent.dataobtainedinresponsetoNRCGenericLetter92OlgReactorVesselStructural Integrity."
UsingthisnewdataandRG1.99,Rev.2,itwasdetermined thattheexistingmaterialradiation damageprediction canbeextendedto23.6EFPYofoperation.
Additional assurance thatRCSP/Tlimitswillnotbeexceededinthelowertemperature operating modesisprovidedbytheLowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)system.Analysesforthissystemconsidertheinitiation ofassumedenergy-addition andmass-addition transients whileoperating atlowtemperatures inaccordance withStandardReviewPlan5.2.2,Revision2.BasesforProosedTSChanesTheanalysisfortheP/TlimitsandLTOPrequirements for15EFPYwereprovidedwithFPLletterL-89-408(Reference 3),andsubsequently approvedbytheissuanceofAmendment No.104(Reference 1)tothefacilityoperating license.Thebasisfordetermining thattheselimitscanbeextendedto23.6EFPYisprovidedbelowbyreviewing theconclusions ofeachsectionoftheanalysis.
'II St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page3of8EXTENDING THEAPPLICABILITY OFTHEP/TLIMITCURVESTheP/Tlimitcurveanalysisfor15EFPYwasdeveloped usingtherequirements of10CFR50AppendixG.Thebasiccalculation methodwasreferenced toASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCode,SectionIII,AppendixG(1986).Thecurrentmethodisunchanged exceptthatin1992ASMErelocated AppendixGtoSectionXI,andthereference stressintensity, Km,isnowreferredtoasK.Theirradiated materialproperties fortheP/Tlimitcurvesarebasedupontheirradiation damageprediction methodsofRG1.99,Rev.2,whichareusedtocalculate theadjustedreference temperature (ART)forallreactorvesselbeltlinematerials.
TheseARTpredictions utilizeinitialmaterialtestproperties, materialchemistry, neutronfluenceandmargin,andistheprimarymaterialvariableinputthatisconsidered intheP/Tanalysis.
AhigherARTvalueismorelimitingforplantoperation.
TheARTisdetermined forthereactorvessellimitingbeltlinematerials fortheperiodofapplicability fortheP/Tlimitcurvesbasedonthepredicted neutronfluence.ThesevaluesareshowninthefirstportionofTable1(Attachment 2ofthissubmittal).
Thecontrolling valuesofARTusedfortheP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPanalysisat15EFPYwere191Fatthe1/4Thickness (1/4T)locationand137'Fatthe3/4Thickness (3/4T)location(Ref.3,Attachment 4,page9).Thecontrolling materialwasthelowershelllongitudinal welds(3-203A,BandC,materialheatnumber305424)forthe1/4Tlocationandtwoofthelowershellplates(C-8-1andC-8-2)forthe3/4Tlocation.
Theterm"controlling" meanshavingthehighestARTforagiventimeandpositionwithinthevesselwall.ThehighestART'sarethenusedtodeveloptheP/Tlimitsforthecorresponding period.Notethatindeveloping theP/Tlimits,aboundingmaterial(SA302GradeB)isassumed.
St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page4of8RG1.99,Rev.2,predictions forARTaredetermined fromthefollowing formulas:
ART=InitialRT~T+dZT~T+MarginInitialRTDTReference temperature
('F)fortheun-irradiated material.
MTgDyMargin(CF)f(0.28-0.10logQ"CF"('F)isthechemistry factor,afunctionofCopperandNickelcontentoftheweldorbasematerial.
"f"isthecalculated neutronfluence(10'/cm,E>1MeV)atthedepthintothevesselfromtheinsidediameterwettedsurfacetothepostulated flaw(surface, 1/4Tand3/4T).Projections offluencearemadeforspecificperiodsoftimeofoperation (EFPY).Thethickness T,withoutthecladding, isconservatively usedtogiveahigherprojected RT~DT.Thequantity('F)tobeaddedtoobtainaconservative upperboundvalueofART.2(0~+0~)"0',=O'Fformeasuredtestvalues,17forgenericdatao'~=17'Fforplateand28'FforweldsNewbeltlineweldmaterialdatabecameavailable asaresultoftheresearchneededtorespondtoNRCGenericLetter92-01.Thisdataishighlighted inthesecondsectionofTable1.Asdescribed below,theplantspecificdatasignificantly reducesthevaluesusedincalculating theART.Forthelimitinglowerlongitudinal welds,thedataincludednewchemistry valuesforcopperandnickel,andanactualinitialRTz,T.ThisnewdatacamefromtheDuquesneLightCo.
St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page5of8BeaverValleyUnit1reactorvesselsurveillance program(Ref.4),whichhasmaterialidentical totheSt.LucieUnit1lowerlongitudinal welds.AsaresultofusingactualplantspecificRT>>Tdata,theoverallmargintermisreducedfrom65.5'Fto56'F,becausea,becomes0'F.TheinitialRT>>~isloweredfrom-56'Fto-60'F.Thenewchemistry valueswereusedwithexistingSt.Lucie1qualification datatogetnewaveragecopperandnickelvalues(Ref.4),whichloweredthe'Fvaluefrom200.2to191.7.Basedonthesurveillance capsuledataremovedfromtheSt.LucieUnit1reactorvessel,theCF'sforthelimitinglowershellplateswerecalculated andprovidedtoFPLbytheNRC(Ref.5).ThenewCFvalueswerelowered,nominally from108to80.Sinceplantspecificdataisusedtocalculate theCF,themarginterm(cr~)canbehalvedfrom34'Fto17'F(RG1.99,Rev.2,Position2.1).Thisdataishighlighted inthesecondsectionofTable1.Usingthenewdata,FPLcalculated (Ref.6)theneutronfluencethatwouldresultinvaluesofRTNDTequaltoorlessthanthelimitingARTsdetermined inthe15EFPYanalysis.
Thenewvaluesoffluencecorrespond to23.6EFPY,asshowninthethirdsectionofTable1.Notethatthelowerlongitudinal weldsarenowthecontrolling materialatboththe1/4Tand3/4Tlocations.
Sincethe23.6EFPYlimitingRT>>~valueswereequaltoorlessthanthoseusedinthe15EFPYanalysis, thecurrentTechnical Specification P/TlimitcurvesandLTOPanalysiswouldbeapplicable foraperiodnottoexceed23.6EFPYwiththesamemarginofsafetyastheprevious15EFPYanalysis.
Thisequivalence coverstheP/Tlimitsforheatup,cooldown, hydrostatic testandcorecriticaloperation.
2~LOWESTSERVICETEMPERATURE, MINIMUMBOLTUPTEMPERATURE, ANDMINIMUMPRESSURELIMITSTheP/Tanalysisfor15EFPYcalculated thelimitsforlowestservicetemperature, minimumboltuptemperature, andminimumpressurelimitsforreference.
Theselimitsarenotbasedonaccumulated fluenceatthereactorvesselbeltlinematerial, andremainunchanged.
Thelowestservicetemperature isbasedonthemostlimitingRT>>TforthebalanceofRCScomponents, whichistheReactorCoolantPump(RCP).Accumulated plantoperation doesnoteffectthiscomponent's materialproperties, therefore thelowestservicetemperature remainsthesame.
=0 St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page6of8Theminimumboltuptemperature isbasedonthehigherstressedregionofthereactorvessel,plusanyeffectsforirradiation effects(Ref.3)andtestinguncertainty.
ThemaximuminitialRT~Tassociated withthestressedregionofthereactorvesselflangeis30'F.Forconservatism aminimumboltuptemperature of80'Fisutilized, whichmorethanaccountsforanyirradiation effectsandtestinguncertainty (Ref.3).Thefluenceat.theflangeregionisatleasttwoordersofmagnitude lowerthanthepeakvesselfluenceatthebeltlinematerials (i.e.,atfuelcoremidplane).
Reference 9indicates thatthefluenceatthetopoftheactivecore,whichislessthan79inchesabovethecoremidplane, decreases to0.1timesthepeakfluenceatthecoremid-plane.
Theflangeisapproximately 130inchesabovethetopofthecore,resulting inareduction fromthepeakfluencebyatleasttwoordersofmagnitude.
Therefore, theradiation affectsareminimal,andthe50'Fmarginissufficient toaccountforanychangesinflangematerialfracturetoughness.
Theminimumpressurelimitisthebreakpointbetweentheminimumboltuptemperature andthelowestservicetemperature, andisdefinedbytheASMEBoilerandPressureVesselCodeas204ofthepre-operational hydrostatic pressure(Ref.3).Thisvaluewasnotaffectedbyaccumulated plantoperation.
3~CORRECTION FACTORSSincetheP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPsetpoints arebasedoncoordinates ofpressurizer pressureandindicated RCSfluidtemperature, correction factorsareincludedintheanalysistoaccountforactualconditions atthelimitingbeltlinematerials.
TheP/TlimitsandLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYprovidedforthesecorrection factors,whichaddresstheconcernsofNRCInformation Notice(IN)93-58"Non-conservatism inLow-Temperature Overpressure Protection forPressurized MaterReactors" (Ref.8).Thelead/lagtemperature differential betweenthevesselbasemetalandtheRCSbulkfluidhasbeenaccounted for.Pressurecorrection factorswerebasedupon:1)thestaticheadduetotheelevation difference ofthevesselwalladjacenttotheactivecoreandthepressurizer pressureinstrument nozzle,and;2)thepressuredifferential basedonthenumberofreactorcoolantpumps(RCP's)inoperation.
ActualpressureatthecoreregionwouldbehigherthanattheRCShotlegandthepressurizer bytheamountofheadlossdue St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page7of8toRCPflowandthestatichead.Below200'F,flowinducedpressuredropisbasedontwoRCP'sinoperation; above200'F,pressuredropisbasedonthreeRCP'sinoperation.
Thisaddresses theconcernsdocumented inIN93-58.Instrument uncertainties havenotbeenincludedintheP/Tcurves.Theuncertainties (errors)weredetermined tobeinsignificant relativetotheconservatism ofthemargintermsincludedintheASMESectionIII,AppendixG,method.NRCconcurrence wasdocumented inthe15EFPYanalysis.
Correction factorsarenotaffectedbyneutronfluence,and,therefore, remainunchanged bytheextension ofapplicability to23.6EFPY.4~LTOPANALYSISTheobjective oftheLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYwastoprecludeviolation oftheP/Tlimitsduringstartupandshutdownconditions.
TheLTOPanalysisremainsunchanged bytheapplicability extension to23.6EFPYbecausetheP/Tlimitcurvesarenotbeingchanged.Therefore itisnotnecessary tore-analyze ormodifytheLTOPsystem.Arelaxation oftheLTOPrequirements fromASMECodeCaseN-514wasincorporated inthe1993Addenda.Thecodecasepermitsthemaximumpressureinthevesseltobe110%ofthepressuredetermined tosatisfytheP/TlimitsperAppendixGofSectionXI,ArticleG-2215.The15EFPYLTOPanalysisisinherently conservative inthatthesetpoints forpoweroperatedreliefvalvesandadministrative andoperational controlsprotectthe1004valueoftheP/Tlimits.5.AMENDINGTHEFOOTNOTEFORUSEOFHPSIASABORATIONPATHOneresultoftheLTOPanalysisfor15EFPYwasarequirement tolimitthemassadditionrateofaHPSIpumpwhenitisusedasaborationpathduringshutdown, withRCSpressureboundaryintegrity established.
ThemethodtolimitthemassadditionratewastoclosetwoofthefourHPSIheaderisolation valves.However,thisrequirement onlyapplieswhenRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists.Thesyntaxusedinfootnote"*"toTS3.1.2.1andTS3.1.2.3couldresultinanunnecessary restrictive interpretation oftherequirements toclosetheHPSIheaderisolation valves.Theproposedrevisionclarifies thatclosingtwoHPSIvalvesisonlyrequiredunderpart(b)ofthefootnote, e.g.,whennochargingpumpsareoperableandRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists.
St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 1Page8of8Conclusion Theproposedperiodofapplicability isbasedonprojections ofirradiation embrittlement forthereactorvesselbeltlinelimitingmaterials.
Since1990,whenthecurrentP/Tlimitcurveswereapproved, newmaterialpropertydatahasbecomeavailable tomakebetterpredictions ofembrittlement forthelimitingbeltlinematerials.
Usingthenewdata,theperiodofapplicability fortheexistingP/TlimitcurvesandLTOPrequirements canbeextendedfrom15EFPYto23.6EFPYwiththesameanalyzedmarginofsafety.
REFERENCES:
1~2~3~4~5.6.7~8.9.USNRClettertoJ.H.Goldberg, "St.LucieUnit1-IssuanceofAmendment Re:PressureTemperature (P/T)LimitsandLowTemperature Overpressure Protection (LTOP)Analysis(TACNo.75386)",datedJunell,1990.(Amendment 104)(Notused)FPLlettertoUSNRC,L-89-408, "St.LucieUnit1,DocketNo.50-335,ProposedLicenseAmendment, P-TLimitsandLTOPAnalysis",
datedDecember5,1989.FPLlettertoUSNRC,L-93-286, "St.LucieUnit1and2,DocketNo.50-335and50-389,GenericLetter92-01,Revision1,ResponsetoRequestforAdditional Information (RAI)",datedNovember15,1993.USNRCLettertoJ.H.Goldberg; GenericLetter(GL)92-01,Revision1,"ReactorVesselStructural Integrity,"
St.LucieUnit1and2(TACNOSM83505andM83506);May26,1994.FPLcalculation PSL-lFJM-95-004, Rev.0,"St.LucieUnit1ReactorVesselAdjustedReference Temperature andLTOPlimitsat23.6EFPY",dated3/22/95.USNRCGenericLetter92-01"ReactorVesselStructural Integrity",
Revision1,DatedMarch6,1992.USNRCInformation Notice93-58"Non-conservatism inLow-Temperature Overpressure Protection forPressurized WaterReactors",
datedJuly26,1993.CEReportTR-F-MCM-004 "FPL,PSL-1Evaluation ofIrradiated CapsuleW97",datedDecember, 1983.
St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT 2TABLE1ST~LUCIEUNIT1REACTORVESSELBELTLINEADJUSTEDREFERENCE TEMPERATURES FORDETERMINING PRESSURETEMPERATURE ANDLTOPLIMITSCURVES TABLE1:STLUCIEUNIT1REACTORVESSELBELTLINEADJUSTEDREFERENCE TEMPERATURES FORDETERMINING PRESSURETEMPERATURE ANDLTOPLIMITSCURVES15YEARPT/LTOPCURVESUSINGEXISTING1989ANALYSIS(Original criticalvaluesbolded)LOCATIONID¹Cu%Ni%CALC.CFTABLECFINITIALRTndtMARGIN15EFPYPEAKFLUENCE,E19n/cm21/4TFLUENCE15YEARART15YEAR3/4TFLUENCE91/4TART93/4TLowershellsteLowershellsteInttoLowerirthweldsC-8-1C-8-2901360.150.150.230.560.570.11107.8108.4109.820OF20oF-60oF34OF34oF56oF2.05E+192.05E+192.05E+191.22E+191.22E+191.22E+194.34E+18168oF4.34E+181BBOF4.34E+18112OF137oF137OF80OFLowerlongitudinal welds3054240.30O.B4200.2-56oF65.5oF1.202E+197.16E+182.54E+18191F135oFNEWCHEMISTRY FACTORS5MARGINSBASEDONGL92-01VALUES(Changesresulting fromnewdatasubmitted withGL92-01anduseofcapsuledataforplatesbolded)LOCATIONID¹CU%CALC.CFTABLECFINITIALRTndtMARGINLowershellsteLowershellsteInttoLowerirthweldsLowerlongitudinal weldsC-8-1C-8-2901383054240.150.150.230.28o.se79.42o.s779.82o.1184.800.63191.720oF20oF-60oF60oF17oF17oF28oF56oFEQUIVALENT FLUENCE(23.6EFPY)ATTIMEOFREACHINGRT/NDTVALUESUSEDIN1SEFPYCURVESWITHGL92%1CHEMISTRY FACTORS/MARGINS (Ref.7.6)(Newcriticalvaluesbolded)LOCATIONLowershelllateLowershellIsteInttoLowerirthweldsLowerlongitudinal weldsID¹C-8-1C-8-29013B305424Cu%0.150.150.230.28Ni%0.5B0.570.110.63CALC.CFTABLECF79.4279.8284.80191.7INITIALRTndt20OF20oF60oF60oFMARGIN17oF17OF28OF56oF22KBEFPYPEAKFLUENCE,E18n/cm22.82E+192.82E+192.82E+191.783E+191/4TFLUENCE3/4TFLUENCE1.BBE+195.97E+181.68E+195.97E+181.68E+195.97E+181.063E+193.78E+1823.BEFPYART61/4T128oF128oF65oF191oF23.6EFPYART93/4T105OF105OF41OF136oF St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsATTACHMENT 3DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit,1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 3Page1of2DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION Pursuantto10CFR50.92, adetermination maybemadethataproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration ifoperation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussed asfollows:(1)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Thepressure-temperature (P/T)limitcurvesintheTechnical Specifications areconservatively generated inaccordance withthefracturetoughness requirements of10CFR50AppendixGassupplemented bytheASMECodeSectionXI,AppendixGrecommendations.
TheRT>>~valuesarebasedonRegulatory Guide1.99,Revision2,shiftprediction andattenuation formula.Analysesofreactorvesselmaterialirradiation surveillance specimens areusedtoverifythevalidityofthefluencepredictions andtheP/Tlimitcurves.Useofthesecurvesinconjunction withthesurveillance specimenprogramensuresthatthereactorcoolantpressureboundarywillbehaveinanon-brittle mannerandthatthepossibility ofrapidlypropagating fractureisminimized.
Basedontheuseofplantspecificmaterialdata,analysishasdemonstrated thatthecurrentP/Tlimitcurveswillremainconservative forupto23.6EFPY.Inconjunction withextending theapplicability oftheexistingP/Tlimitcurves,thelowtemperature overpressure protection (LTOP)analysisfor15EFPYisalsoextended.
TheLTOPanalysisconfirmsthatthecurrentsetpoints forthepower-operated reliefvalves(PORVs)willprovidetheappropriate overpressure protection atlowReactorCoolantSystem(RCS)temperatures.
BecausetheP/Tlimitcurveshavenotchanged,theexistingLTOPvalueshavenotchanged,whichincludethePORVsetpoints, heatupandcooldownrates,anddisabling ofnon-essential components.
St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedLicenseAmendment RCSPressureTemeratureLimitsL-95-139Attachment 3Page2of2Theproposedamendment doesnotchangetheconfiguration oroperation oftheplant,andassurance isprovidedthatreactorvesselintegrity willbemaintained.
Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment willnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
(2)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Byapplyingplantspecificdatainthedetermination ofcriticalvesselmateriallimits,theapplicability oftheexistingpressuretemperature limitsandLTOPrequirements canbeextended.
Thereisnochangeintheconfiguration oroperation ofthefacilityasaresultoftheproposedamendment.
Theamendment doesnotinvolvetheadditionofnewequipment orthemodification ofexistingequipment, nordoesitalterthedesignofSt.Lucieplantsystems.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
(3)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Analysishasdemonstrated thatthefracturetoughness requirements of10CFR50AppendixGaresatisfied andthatconservative operating restrictions aremaintained forthepurposeoflowtemperature overpressure protection.
TheP/Tlimitcurveswillprovideassurance thattheRCSpressureboundarywillbehaveinaductilemannerandthattheprobability ofarapidlypropagating fractureisminimized.
Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedonthediscussion presented aboveandonthesupporting Evaluation ofProposedTSChanges,FPLhasconcluded thatthisproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration.