ML17229A358: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY1REGULATO~~ | {{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY1REGULATO~~ | ||
INFORMATION DISTRTBUT'ON~iSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9706040201 DOC.DATE: | |||
97/0'./29 NOTARIZED: | |||
YESFACIL:50-335 St.LuciePlant,Un.it1,FloridaPowersLightCo.50-3d9St;LuciePlant,Unit2,FloridaPower~LightCo.AU'1'H.NAMF: | |||
AUTHORAFFiLIA7ION | |||
,STALL,J,A. | |||
FloridaPower6LightC~.RECIP.NAMERECiPIENT AFFILIATION DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk) | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Application foramendstolicensesDPR-67aNPF-16,incorporating administrative changesthat.willimproveconsistency throughout TSs&relatedBases.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal: | |||
eiWkn-r h+~eSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | GeneralDistribution NOTES:DOCKET0500033505009389l1I1CERECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD2-3LAWIENS,L.COPIESRECIPIENT LTTRENCLIDCODE/NAME 11PD2-3PD11COPIESLTTRENCL110INTERNAL: | ||
MA~1-a'III/plI1I' St.LucieUnit1andUnit2Docket:Nos.50-335and50- | ACRSNRR/DE/ECGB/A NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS3EXTERNAL: | ||
NOAC111111111011R01NRR/DE/EMCB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRCPDR1111111111D0CM'NNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS: | |||
PLEASEHELPUS"TOREDUCEWASTE,TOHAVEYOURNAMEORORGANIZATION REMOVEDFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSORREDUCETHENUMBEROFCOPIESRECEIVEDBYYOUORYOURORGANIZATION, CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK(DCD)ONEXTENSION 415-2083TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED: | |||
LTTR14ENCL'13 J1~yCt'*kA FloridaPower5LightCompany,6501SouthOceanDrive.JensenBeach,FL34957May29,1997L-97-13410CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555RE:St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments Pursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67for'St.LucieUnit1andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2byincorporating theattachedadministrative changes.Theproposedamendments willimproveconsistency throughout theTechnical Specifications andtheirrelatedBasesbyremovingoutdatedmaterial, incorporating minorchangesintext,makingeditorial corrections, andresolving otherinconsistencies identified bytheplantoperations staff.Itisrequested thattheproposedamendments, ifapproved, beissuedbyDecember31,1997.Attachment 1isanevaluation oftheproposedchanges.Attachment 2isthe"Determination ofNoSignificant HazardsConsideration." | |||
Attachments 3and4containcopiesoftheaffectedtechnical specifications pagesmarkeduptoshowtheproposedchanges.Theproposedamendments havebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFPLCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordance with'0CFR50.91(b)(1),copiesoftheproposedamendments arebeingforwarded totheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestions aboutthissubmittal. | |||
Verytrulyyours,J.A.StallVicePresident St.LuciePlant9706040201 97052PDRADQCKOS00033SPDR@gal(lliilliilllglllllllllllllllllllllllllll, anFPi.GrouPcomPany St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Page2JAS/RLDAttachments cc:RegionalAdministrator, RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti, FloridaDepartment ofHealthandRehabilitative Services. | |||
eiWkn-r h+~eSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~J.A.Stallbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident, St.LuciePlant,fortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower&LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;That.hehasexecutedtheforegoing document; thatthestatements madeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge, information andbelief,andthatheisauthorized toexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee. | |||
J.A.StallSTATEOFFLORIDAaCOUNTYOF+LACIWSworntoandsubscribed beforemethis~dayoffAbyJ.A.Stall,whoispersonally knowntome.A3hW~~Signature ofaryPublic-State ofFloridaLesl10J.WhltWeIIas::asMYCOMMISSION ICC646183EXPIRESMay12,2001"4jv'ij%'NEDTHRU TR0YFANssURAcE,INc,NameofNotaryPublic(Print,Type,orStamp) | |||
MA~1-a'III/plI1I' St.LucieUnit1andUnit2Docket:Nos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES | |||
~M~Ar~I- | ~M~Ar~I- | ||
,~)I1i%<<I4St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.'0- | ,~)I1i%<<I4St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.'0-335 and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page1of16EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESTheproposedamendments toFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1(PSL1)andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willimproveconsistency throughout theTechnical Specifications (TS)andtheirrelatedBasesbyremovingoutdatedmaterial, incorporating minorchangesintextforpurposesofclarification, makingeditorial corrections, andresolving otherinconsistencies identified bytheplantoperations staff.Copies'oftheaffectedTSpages,marked-up toshowtheproposedchanges,arecontained inAttachment 3.a.Thefollowing revisions willimproveconsistency withinthePSL1TSbydeletingoutdatedmaterial, deletingorcorrecting improperreferences, andcorrecting spellingandothertypographic errors.(1)On~~II:IntheHQ~Hcolumnofthisindex,thefirstsectionnumberlistedis"3/7.7.2" whichcontainsatypographic error.Rg~toread,"3/4.7.2." | ||
thirdline,Zgy~!theimproperspelling"concentation" toread"concentration." | |||
thebottomofthepage,pe~superseded Amendment No."63"toread,"M."Thistypographic errorwasintroduced whenthepagewasre-typedforAmendment 150."''i'hrough | |||
...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-4through...havebeendeleted." | |||
Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 149,i.e.,page3/46-3hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS.:a"''''""''f'hrough | |||
...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-22through...havebeendeleted." | |||
Thistypographic error | |||
~~hI~ | ~~hI~ | ||
4(%~10St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | 4(%~10St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page2of16wasintroduced inAmendment 149,i.e.,Page3/46-20hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS.(6)Onstatement, 3~1~3~2~Insertion 27.InSPECIALTESTEXCEPTIONS andintheassociated 401~theoutdatedreference toSpecification Specification 3.1.3.2,PartLengthCEALimits,wasremovedfromtheTSbyAmendment (7)OnEXPLOSIVE GASMIXTUREtoread,"Theconcentration ofoxygeninthewastegasdecaytankshallbedetermined tobewithintheabovelimitsbycontinuously monitoring thewastegasesintheon-service wastegasdecaytank~~IISpecification 3.3.3.10, EXPLOSIVE GASMONITORING SYSTEM,andassociated Table3.3-13weredeletedfromtheTSbyAmendment 147.TheproposedrevisiontoSurveillance 4.11.2.5.1 doesnotaltertherequirement tocontinuously monitoroxygenintheon-service wastegasdecaytank.(8)OnUndertheheadinginthesecondlineofthefirstparagraph, gyZj~theimproperreference to"10CFRAppendixG"toread,"10CFR50,AppendixG."Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 81.(9)On~~:Undertheheading,inthesecondparagraph, gjlaZ~thenumber"5.3.2"toread"5.3.1.2." | ||
~ts~%rSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | Theexistingnumerical patternduplicates useoftheidentifier fororiginalSpecification 5.3.2shownonsubsequent page5-5undertheheading,aKIU!Ltd. | ||
~ts~%rSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page3of16b.Thefollowing minorchangesintextareproposedforthepurposeofclarification, andtoassureconsistent implementation ofthestatedrequirements. | |||
Tzpg>200Fpsentencetoread,UnderBORATIONCONTROL,SHUTDOWNMARGIN-,~Zj~thesecond"Iftheinoperable CEAisnotfullyinserted, andisimmovable asaresultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference orisknowntobeuntrippable, theaboverequiredSHUTDOWNMARGINshallbeincreased byanamountatleastequaltothewithdrawn worthoftheimmovable oruntrippable CEA(s)."Thissurveillance requirestheSHUTDOWNMARGIN(SDM)tobedetermined withinonehourafterdetection ofaninoperable CEA(s)andatleastonceper12hoursthereafter whiletheCEA(s)isinoperable. | |||
IfoneormoreCEAsbecomeimmovable asa.resultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference, orknowntobeuntrippable, Specification 3.1.3.1.a prohibits continued reactoroperation. | |||
TheSDMrequiredbyTS3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1 isconservatively increased byanamountattelsinceitislikelytheaffectedCEA(s)wouldnotinsertonareactortripsignal.Thisaction,inadditiontoassumingthattheCEAofhighestreactivity worthisfullywithdrawn per'S1.29,ensuresthatadequateshutdownreactivity isavailable consistent withthesafetyanalyses. | |||
Theproposedchangeintextaddsmodifiers totheconditions ofimmovable anduntrippable consistent withthesesameconditions addressed inACTION3.1.3.1.a forMovableControlAssemblies/Full LengthCEAPosition, andmakesclearthatthespecified SDMneednotbeincreased byanadditional amountcorresponding tothewithdrawn worthoftheaffectedCEA(s)iftheaffectedCEA(s)isfullyinserted. | |||
ThisrevisiondoesnotaltertheintentofSurveillance 4.1.1.1.1.a andimprovesconsistency withintheTS. | |||
lE.~~ | lE.~~ | ||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2-DocketNos.50-335and50- | St.LucieUnit1andUnit2-DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page4of16(2)OnIntheBORATIONSYSTEMS,FLOWPATHS-SHUTDOWN andCHARGINGPUMPS-SHUTDOWN read,"...(b)RCSpressureboundaryintegrity existsandnochargingpumpsareoperable." | ||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | Footnote*wasestablished byAmendment 60andsubsequently modifiedbyAmendments 81,104,and141,andprovidestheplantconditions forwhichaHighPressureSafetyInjection Pumpmaybeusedtoestablish aborationflowpathfromtheRefueling WaterTanktotheRCSinMODES5and6.Theconditions arebasedonassumptions andconditions evaluated intheanalysisforlowtemperature overpressureprotection (LTOP)andensurethattheLTOPsetpoints remainvalid.IfRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists,theadditional restrictions onchargingpumps,heatupandcooldownrates,andHPSIheaderisolation valvesspecified inthefootnotearerequired. | ||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | Ifpressureboundaryintegrity doesnotexist,asdefinedinTS1.16,theserestrictions arenotrequired. | ||
Theproposedrevisiontopart(b)ofthefootnoteprovidesfurtherclarification thatpart(b)onlyappliestothecasewhereRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists.(3)ELENGTHCEAPOSITIONtoread,forFULL"b)TheSHUTDOWNMARGINrequirement ofSpecification 3.1.1.1isdetermined atleastonceper12hours.gagasastand-alone statement to"Otherwise, beinatleastHOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6hours"Repositioning thetextremovesanambiguity fromtheexistingconstruction inthattherequiredunittransition toHOTSTANDBYisrequiredifbothACTION3.1.3.1.d.l and3.1.3.1.d.2 arenotmet,e.g.,thestatement appliestofailuretocompleteACTIONdasawholeratherthanonlyfailuretocompletepartd.2.b).Thisrevisionisconsistent withthecorresponding TS3.1.3.1.f forPSL2.Inaddition, addingtheword"next" I,2~ | |||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page5of16makesclearthatthe6houractioncompletion timebeginsuponfailuretosatisfyACTION3.1.3.1.d, andisconsistent withNUREG-1432, Revision1.(4)LENGTHCEAPOSITIONSpecification, | |||
~thestand-alone statement, "Otherwise, beinat'eastHOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6hours."Addingtheproposedstatement ensuresthat,uponfailuretocomplywithACTION3.1.3.1.f, actionswillbetakentoplacetheunitinaModeforwhichtheLCOnolongerapplies,andwithoutaneedtoinvokeSpecification 3.0.3.Theactionandcompletion timeareconsistent withtherequirements ofNUREG-1432, Revision1.(5)/*toread,"WhentheflowpathfromtheRWTtotheRCSviaasingleHPSIpumpisestablished per3.1.2.1or3.1.2.3andRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists,theheatupandcooldownratesshallbeestablished inaccordance withFig.3.1-lbFootnote*wasestablished byAmendment 81tosupportTS3.1.2.1and3.1.2.3.Thesespecifications limittheheatupandcooldownratesperFigure3.1-1bonlyforthecondition ofapplicability inwhichaflowpathfromtheRWTtotheRCSviaaHPSIpumpisestablished pressureboundaryintegrity exists.Ifpressureboundaryintegrity doesnotexistasdefinedinTS1.16,thenFigure3.1-1bdoesnotapply.TheproposedrevisiontoFootnote*ofTS3.4.9.1conformswiththerequirements providedinTS3.1.2.1and3.1.2.3forusingthereferenced Figure3.1-lb,andtherebyremovestheexistingambiguity andimprovesconsistency withinthefacilityTS. | |||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page6of16(6)On-:UnderCONTAINMENT SYSTEMS,VACUUMRELIEFVALVES,Zg~Specification 3.6.5.1toread,"Thecontainment vesseltoannulusvacuumreliefvalvesThewords"lessthanorequalto"inconjunction with"+0.25"createanambiguous syntax.FPLreviewedthevacuumreliefvalvesetpointcalculations, andconfirmed thatthewords"lessthanorequalto"werenotappropriate whenconsidering thenominaldesignvaluesassumedintheanalysisforinadvertent containment sprayactuation (UpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport,Section6.2).Theproposedrevisionwillremovetheerroneous phraseintroduced inAmendment 90,andmaketheSpecification consistent withtheassociated Surveillance 4.6.5.1.(7)PENETRATIONS, Zey~,Specification 3.9.4.ctoread,"Eachpenetration providing directaccessfromthecontainment atmosphere totheoutsideatmosphere shall-beeither:", | |||
andZg~kacondition 3.9.4.c.i toread,"Closedbyanisolation valve,blindflange,ormanualvalve,exceptforvaZvesthatareopenonanintermittent basisunderadministrative controlor"Thereferenced Table3.6-2,CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES,contained aprovision (footnote | |||
*)foropeningcertainnormallyclosedvalvesonanintermittent basisunderadministrative control.TSAmendment 149,whichincorporated theprovisions ofGenericLetter(GL)91-08,deletedTable3.6-2fromthefacilityTS.GL91-08didnotspecifically addresstheRefueling Operations TS3.9.4.However,itwasrecognized thatthelistofcontainment isolation valves,e.g.,Table3.6-2,typically includesfootnotes thatmodifytheTSrequirements forthesevalvesandalsoaddressoperational considerations forspecificvalvesthatmay | |||
: k. | : k. | ||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page7of16beopenedonanintermittent basisunderadministrative control.Moreover, GL91-08states,"Suchnotesmustbeincorporated intotheassociated LCOsothattheywillremainineffectwhenthetablecontaining thesefootnotes isremovedfromtheTS."TheproposedrevisiontoTS3.9.4deletestheoutdatedreference toTable3.6-2,incorporates theassociated provision forintermittent operation ofvalvesunderadministrative controlthatwascontained infootnote*tothattable,andisconsistent withGL91-08.CRANEOPERABILITY, 403~thelastsentenceofMPH,whichstates,"Theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.3arenot.applicable.", | ||
~PSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | andgg>~thelastlineoftoread,"...cutoffwhenbeforethecraneloadexceeds3000pounds."TheACTIONstatement reference toSpecification 3.0.3isoutdatedandredundant, i.e.,TS3.9.6isonlyapplicable duringrefueling operations andSpecification 3.0.3,bydefinition, isnotapplicable inthisMode.TS3.9.6requiresthemanipulator craneoverloadcutofflimittobes3000pounds.TheexistingSurveillance requiresademonstration oftheloadcutoff"when"thecraneload~~h3000pounds.TheproposedrevisionmakesSurveillance 4.9.6consistent withtheLCO.c~Thefollowing revisions willupdatetheTSBasesasindicated. | ||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments~~L-97- | (1)On"Thespecified setpointprovidesallowance thattherewillbesufficient waterinventory inthesteamrequiredsufficienttimeforanyoperatoractiontoinitiateauxiliaryfeedwater beforereactorcoolantsystemsubcooling islost." | ||
~~k St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | ~PSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page8of16Therevisionmoreaccurately reflectstheacceptance criteriaassociated withthisreactortripsetpointwhichrequiresthatthereactorcoolantremainsubcooled forthelimitinglossoffeedwater transients. | ||
a.)e't1 St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | Therevisionisconsistent withtheSt.LucieUnit1safetyanalysesasreportedintheUpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR).(2)Ony,theBasestoread,"TheRateofChangeofprotectthecoreduringservesasabackuptostartupratelimit.~~Power-High tripisprovidedtostartupoperations anditsusetheadministratively enforcedSystem-.Thetripisnotcreditedinanydesignbasisaccidentevaluated inUFSARChapter25ghowever,thetripisconsidered inthesafetyanalysisinthatthepresenceofthistripfunctionprecluded theneedforspecificanalysesofothereventsinitiated fromsubcriticalconditions."Therevisionmoreaccurately describes therelationbetweenthisreactorprotection systemtripfunctionandtheplantsafetyanalyses. | ||
4e~${,1St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments~~L-97- | Therevisionisconsistent withABBCombustion Engineering TechNoteNo.96-04,issuedAugust14,1996,whichwasconfirmed byFPLtobeapplicable toSt.LucieUnit1.(3)OnUndertheheadingXg~thesecondparagraph toread,Therestrictions associated withtheestablishing oftheflowpathfromtheRWTtotheRCSviaasingleHPSIpumpprovideassurance thatZOCFR50AppendixGpressure/temperature limitswillnotbeexceededinthecaseofanyinadvertent pressuretransient duetoamassadditiontotheRCS.IfRCSpressureboundaryintegrity doesnotexistasdefinedinSpecification 1.26,theserestrictions arenotrequired. | ||
sa)~IlI't.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | Additionally, alimitonthemaximumnumberofoperableHPSIpumpsisnotnecessary whenthepressurizer manwaycoveror.thereactorvesselheadisremoved. | ||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments | ||
~~L-97-134Attachment 1Page9of16Therevisions provideadditional clarification insupportofthefootnotes associated withTS3.1.2.1and3.1.2.3.andareconsistent withtheSt.LucieUnit1LTOPanalysis. | |||
Inaddition, LTOPeventswitheitherthepressurizer manway.coverorthereactorvesselheadremovedarenotcredible. | |||
(4)On~thefollowing paragraph, "Inaccordance withGenericLetter91-08,RemovalofComponent ListsfromtheTechnical Specifications, theopeningoflockedorsealedclosedcontainment isolation valvesonanintermittentbasisunderadministrativecontrolincludesthefollowing considerations: | |||
(2)stationing anoperator, whoisinconstantcommunication withthecontrolroom,atthevalvecontrols, (2)instructing thisoperatortoclosethesevalvesinanaccidentsituation, and(3)assuringthatenvironmental. | |||
conditions willnotprecludeaccesstoclosethevalvesandthatthisactionwillpreventthereleaseofradioactivity outsidethecontainment." | |||
Thisparagraph supportstheproposedrevisiontoTS3.9.4(item1.b(7)ofthisevaluation), | |||
andisconsistent withGL91-08.ENDOFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESFORPSL1 EJ~~Ptlt'r St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page10of162~CopiesoftheaffectedTSpages,marked-up toshowtheproposedchanges,arecontained inAttachment 4.a.Thefollowing revisions willimproveconsistency withinthePSL2TSbydeletingoutdatedmaterial, deletingorcorrecting improperreferences, andcorrecting othertypographic errors.ENGINEERING GROUP,"andassociated subsections, andIZIlmhaZthesubsequent Qg~gtoread,"6.W6.2o3SHIFTTECHNICAL ADVISOR"Theindicated SectionswerechangedbyAmendment 69.(2)On~~(:Under6.5.2COMPANYNUCLEARREVIEWBOARD,gL44thesection,"TECHNICAL REVIEWRESPONSIBILITIES oo~oooo~622ThissectionwasaddedtotheTSbyAmendment 69.(3)Onllitiillioo from"1"toread"2/Train." | |||
Thistypographic errorwasmadeintheoriginallicense.TheECCSareaventilation systemisdesignedwithtwoindependent trainsandtherevisionwillminimizethepotential foranunmonitored noblegaseffluentrelease.Therevisionisconsistent withtheformatshownforthecorresponding monitorsinthePSL1TS.oi""'ithrough...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-4through...havebeendeleted." | |||
Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 88,i.e.,page3/46-3hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS.Eo'"I21through...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-22through...havebeendeleted." | |||
Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 88,i.e.,Page3/46-21hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS. | |||
~~k St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page11of16(6)word"that."IntheThisgrammatical errorwasintroduced byAmendment 39.(7)OnRQKikgEXPLOSIVE GASMIXTUREtoread,"Theconcentration ofoxygeninthewastegasdecaytankshallbedetermined tobewithintheabovelimitsbycontinuosly monitoring thewastegasesintheon-service wastegasdecaytankSpecification 3.3.3.10, EXPLOSIVE GASMONITORING SYSTEM,andassociated Table3.3-13weredeletedfromtheTSbyAmendment 86.TheproposedrevisiontoSurveillance 4.11.2.5.1 doesnotaltertherequirement tocontinuously monitoroxygenintheon-service wastegasdecaytank.b.Thefollowing minorchangesintextareproposedforthepurposeofclarification, andtoassureconsistent implementation ofthestatedrequirements. | |||
TzpgGREATERTHAN200Fgthesecondsentencetoread,"Iftheinoperable CEAisnotSullyinserted, andisimmovable asaresultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference orisknowntobeuntrippable, theaboverequiredSHUTDOWNMARGINshallbeverifiedacceptable withanincreased allowance forthewithdrawn worthoftheimmovable oruntrippable CEA(s)."Thissurveillance requirestheSHUTDOWNMARGIN(SDM)tobedetermined withinonehourafterdetection ofaninoperable CEA(s)andatleastonceper12hoursthereafter whiletheCEA(s)isinoperable. | |||
IfoneormoreCEAsbecomeimmovable asaresultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference, orknowntobeuntrippable, Specification 3.1.3.1.a prohibits continued reactoroperation. | |||
TheSDMrequiredbyTS3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1 isconservatively increased byanamountatthdsinceitislikelytheaffectedCEA(s)wouldnotinsert St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page12of16onareactortripsignal.Thisaction,inadditiontoassumingthattheCEAofhighestreactivity worthisfullywithdrawn perTS1.29,ensuresthatadequateshutdownreactivity isavailable consistent withthesafetyanalyses. | |||
Theproposedchangeintextaddsmodifiers totheconditions ofimmovable anduntrippable consistent withthesesameconditions addressed inACTION3.1.3.1.a forMovableControlAssemblies/CEA | |||
: Position, andmakesclearthatthespecified SDMneednotbeincreased byanadditional amountcorresponding tothewithdrawn worthoftheaffectedCEA(s)iftheaffectedCEA(s)isfullyinserted. | |||
ThisrevisiondoesnotaltertheintentofSurveillance 4.1.1.1.1.a andimprovesconsistency withintheTS.(2)POSITIONSpecification, | |||
~thestand-alone statement, "Otherwise, heinatleastIIOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6'ours.",andZgZig~kthefinalstatement ofML[QH3.1.3.1.f toread,"Otherwise, beinatleastHOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6hours."Addingtheproposedstatement toACTION3.1.3.1.e ensuresthat,uponfailuretocomplywiththeACTION,theunitwillbeplacedinaModeforwhichtheLCOnolongerapplies,andwithoutaneedtoinvokeSpecification 3.0.3.Thisstatement wasinadvertently deletedbyAmendment 8.Addingtheword"next"tothestatement inbothcasesmakesclearthatthecompletion timebeginsuponfailuretosatisfythespecified ACTIONS.Theactionstatement, andspecified completion timeareconsistent withrequirements ofNUREG-1432, Revision1.(3):I~?'~withanasterisktoread,"TheReactorCoolantSystemtotalflowrateshallbedetermined tobewithinitslimitbymeasurement* | |||
atleastonceper18months.", | |||
andajarthefollowing footnote: | |||
a.)e't1 St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page13of16*Notrequiredtobeperformed untilTHERMALONERisz904ofKLVEDTHERMALPCNER.Thesurveillance isapplicable duringoperational MODE1,andtheflowratemeasurement i.sperformed bycalorimetric heatbalance.Theproposedfootnoteisnecessary toallowmeasurement oftheflowrateatnormaloperating conditions inMODE1sincethesurveillance cannotbeperformed inMODE2orbelow,andwillnotyieldaccurateresultsifperformed below904ofratedthermalpower.Thisrevisionisconsistent withcorresponding SR3.4.1.4ofNUREG-1432, Revision1,andwithcorresponding Surveillance 4.2.5.2ofthePSL1TS.(4)RELIEFVALVES,gag~Specification 3.6.5toread,"Theprimarycontainment vesseltoannulusvacuumreliefvalvesshallbeOPERABLEwithanactuation setpointof9.85+0.35inchesWaterGauge."Thewords"lessthanorequalto"inconjunction with"+0.35"createanambiguous syntax.FPLreviewedthevacuumreliefvalvesetpointcalculations, andconfirmed thatthewords"lessthanorequalto"werenotappropriate whenconsidering thenominaldesignvaluesassumedintheanalysisforinadvertent containment sprayactuation (UFSAR,Section6.2).Theproposedrevisionwillremovetheerroneous phrasewhichwasintroduced inAmendment 60.(5)CRANE,za~thelastlineoftoread,whenbeforethecraneloadexceeds3000pounds."TS3.9.6requiresthemanipulator craneoverloadcutofflimittobelessthanorequalto3000pounds.TheexistingSurveillance requiresademonstration oftheloadcutoff"when"thecraneloadgzggg~3000pounds.TheproposedrevisionmakesSurveillance 4.9.6consistent withtheLCO. | |||
4e~${,1St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments | |||
~~L-97-134Attachment 1Page14of16c~Thefollowing revisions willupdatetheTSBasesasindicated. | |||
inthethirdparagraph, firstsentence, | |||
@langthenumerical valueoftheDNB-SAFDL from1.20to1.28.TherevisionupdatesthisBasessectionwiththe.reference DNBRlimitvaluethatiscurrently usedintheExtendedStatistical Combination ofUncertainties (ESCU)cyclespecificsetpointanalysesforPSL2.Thereference DNBRlimitvalueof1.28inconjunction withESCUcorresponds toa954probability ata954confidence levelthatdeparture fromnucleateboilingwillnotoccurduringsteadystateoperation, normaloperational transients, andanticipated transients. | |||
Therevisionisconsistent withtheminimumDNBRvaluereportedinthePSL2UFSAR(Amendment 10,7/96).(2)firstsentence, phd~thenumerical valueoftheDNB-SAFDL from1.20to1.28,andXa~thethirdparagraph toread,"TheThermalMargin/Low Pressuretripsetpoints arederivedfromthecoresafetylimitsthroughapplication ofappropriate allowances forequipment responsetime,measurement uncertainties andprocessing error.~zrfetyTheallowances includes: | |||
anvariable(powerdependent) allowance tocompensate forpotential powerforpotential temperature measurement uncertainty; andemeasurement error;andanallowance tocompensate forthetimedelayassociated withproviding effective termination oftheoccurrence thatexhibitsthemostrapiddecreaseinmargintothesafetylimit.The-~TherevisiontotheDNB-SAFDL numerical valueisconsistent withtheminimumDNBRvalue.reportedinthePSL2UFSAR(Amendment 10,7/96),andisdiscussed initem2.c.(1)preceding. | |||
sa)~IlI't.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page15of16TheThermalMargin/Low Pressure(TM/LP)reactortripsetpoints areverifiedaspartofthecycle-specific setpointanalysesperformed foreachfuelreload,whichisevaluated under10CFR50.59.Individual parameter valuesmaybeadjusted, withinlimits,tooptimizeanalytical andoperating marginsprovidedbythesetpoints. | |||
Removingthenumerical valuesassociated withtheequipment responsetimemeasurement uncertainties andprocessing errorswillprecludetheneedforunnecessary Basesrevisions asaresultofminoradjustments thatcanbemadetosuchvaluesforreloadcoredesigns.Therevisionisconsistent withthesummarybasesstatements contained inthePSL1TSBaseswhichonlydescribethetypesofallowances considered fortheTM/LPsetpoints. | |||
(3)Lgz,Zg~thesecondsentencetoread,"Thisspecified setpointprovidesallowance thattherewillbesufficient waterinventory inthesteamgenerator atthetimeofthetriptoprovidesufficient timeforanyoperatoraction'oinitiateauxiliary feedwater beforereactorcoolantsystemsubcooling islost."Therevisionmoreaccurately reflectstheacceptance criteriaassociated withthisreactortripsetpointwhichrequiresthatthereactorcoolantremainsubcooled forthelimitinglossoffeedwater transients. | |||
Therevisionisconsistent withtheSt.LucieUnit2safetyanalysesasreportedintheUFSAR.I(4)On"TheRateofChangeofprotectthecoreduringservesasabackuptostartupratelimit.~~Power-High tripisprovidedtostartupoperations anditsusetheadministratively enforcedSystem-.Thetripisnotcreditedinanydesignbasisaccidentevaluated inUFSARChapter25ghovever,thetripisconsidered inthesafetyanalysisinthatthepresence St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page16of16ofthistripfunctionprecluded theneedforspecificanalysesofothereventsinitiatedfromsubcriticalconditions."Therevisionmoreaccurately describes therelationbetweenthisreactorprotection systemtripfunctionandtheplantsafetyanalyses. | |||
Therevisionisconsistent withABBCombustion Engineering TechNoteNo.96-04,issuedAugust14,1996,whichwasconfirmed byFPLtobeapplicable toSt.LucieUnit2.(5)OnRhMEXEeanumerical valueoftheminimumDNBRfrom1.20to1.28.Therevisionisconsistent withtheminimumDNBRvaluereportedinthePSL2UFSAR(Amendment 10,7/96),andisdiscussed initem2.c.(1)preceding. | |||
Theproposedchangeswillimplement minorchangesintexttorectifyreference, typographic, | |||
: omission, spelling, and/orconsistency-in-format errors.ChangesinwordingproposedfortheBasesSectionsrectifyerrorsinstatedparameters and/orerrorsofcontradiction inordertomoreaccurately reflecttheactualbasesfortheassociated LCOs.Thechangesareadministrative innatureandwillimproveconsistency withintheTSforeachunit. | |||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION 4~~St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 2Page1of2DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION Theproposedamendments willimproveconsistency throughout theTechnicalSpecifications andtheirrelatedBaseshyremovingoutdatedmaterial, incorporating minorchangesintext,makingeditorial corrections, andresolving otherinconsistencies identified bytheplantoperations staff.Pursuantto10CFR50.92, adetermination maybemadethataproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration ifoperation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussed asfollows:(1)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsecpxences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated. | |||
Theproposedamendments consistofadministrative changestotheTechnical Specifications (TS)forSt.LucieUnits1and2.Theamendments will.implement minorchangesintexttorectifyreference, typographic, | |||
: spelling, and/orconsistency-in-format errors;updatetheTSBases;and/orotherwise improveconsistency withintheTSforeachunit.Theproposedamendments donotinvolvechangestotheconfiguration ormethodofoperation ofplantequipment thatisusedtomitigatetheconsequences ofanaccident, nordothechangesotherwise affecttheinitialconditions orconservatisms assumedinanyoftheplantaccidentanalyses. | |||
Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendments wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated. | |||
~~ | ~~ | ||
a*IISt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | a*IISt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 2Page2of2(2)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. | ||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50- | Theproposedadministrative revisions willnotchangethephysicalplantorthemodesofplantoperation definedintheFacilityLicenseforeachunit.Thechangesdonotinvolvetheadditionormodification ofequipment nordotheyalterthedesignoroperation ofplantsystems.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendments wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated. | ||
(3)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Theproposedamendments areadministrative innatureanddonotchangethebasisforanytechnical specification thatisrelatedtotheestablishment of,orthepreservation of,anuclearsafetymargin.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendments wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedontheabovediscussion andthesupporting Evaluation ofTechnical Specification changes,FPLhasdetermined thattheproposedlicenseamendments involvenosignificant hazardsconsideration. | |||
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments ST~LUCZEUNZT1MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECZFZCATZON PAGESPagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePageVIIB2-6B2-83/41-13/41-43/41-83/41-123/41-213/41-223/42-93/44-213/46-33/46-203/46-263/49-43/49-63/410-23/411-14B3/41-3B3/44-15B3/49-15-4}} | |||
Revision as of 14:44, 29 June 2018
| ML17229A358 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 05/29/1997 |
| From: | STALL J A FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17229A359 | List: |
| References | |
| L-97-134, NUDOCS 9706040201 | |
| Download: ML17229A358 (37) | |
Text
CATEGORY1REGULATO~~
INFORMATION DISTRTBUT'ON~iSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9706040201 DOC.DATE:
97/0'./29 NOTARIZED:
YESFACIL:50-335 St.LuciePlant,Un.it1,FloridaPowersLightCo.50-3d9St;LuciePlant,Unit2,FloridaPower~LightCo.AU'1'H.NAMF:
AUTHORAFFiLIA7ION
,STALL,J,A.
FloridaPower6LightC~.RECIP.NAMERECiPIENT AFFILIATION DocumentControlBranch(Document ControlDesk)
SUBJECT:
Application foramendstolicensesDPR-67aNPF-16,incorporating administrative changesthat.willimproveconsistency throughout TSs&relatedBases.DISTRIBUTION CODE:A001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR ENCLSIZE:TITLE:ORSubmittal:
GeneralDistribution NOTES:DOCKET0500033505009389l1I1CERECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD2-3LAWIENS,L.COPIESRECIPIENT LTTRENCLIDCODE/NAME 11PD2-3PD11COPIESLTTRENCL110INTERNAL:
ACRSNRR/DE/ECGB/A NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRXB OGC/HDS3EXTERNAL:
NOAC111111111011R01NRR/DE/EMCB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRCPDR1111111111D0CM'NNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUS"TOREDUCEWASTE,TOHAVEYOURNAMEORORGANIZATION REMOVEDFROMDISTRIBUTION LISTSORREDUCETHENUMBEROFCOPIESRECEIVEDBYYOUORYOURORGANIZATION, CONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK(DCD)ONEXTENSION 415-2083TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR14ENCL'13 J1~yCt'*kA FloridaPower5LightCompany,6501SouthOceanDrive.JensenBeach,FL34957May29,1997L-97-13410CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555RE:St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments Pursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67for'St.LucieUnit1andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2byincorporating theattachedadministrative changes.Theproposedamendments willimproveconsistency throughout theTechnical Specifications andtheirrelatedBasesbyremovingoutdatedmaterial, incorporating minorchangesintext,makingeditorial corrections, andresolving otherinconsistencies identified bytheplantoperations staff.Itisrequested thattheproposedamendments, ifapproved, beissuedbyDecember31,1997.Attachment 1isanevaluation oftheproposedchanges.Attachment 2isthe"Determination ofNoSignificant HazardsConsideration."
Attachments 3and4containcopiesoftheaffectedtechnical specifications pagesmarkeduptoshowtheproposedchanges.Theproposedamendments havebeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFPLCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordance with'0CFR50.91(b)(1),copiesoftheproposedamendments arebeingforwarded totheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestions aboutthissubmittal.
Verytrulyyours,J.A.StallVicePresident St.LuciePlant9706040201 97052PDRADQCKOS00033SPDR@gal(lliilliilllglllllllllllllllllllllllllll, anFPi.GrouPcomPany St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Page2JAS/RLDAttachments cc:RegionalAdministrator, RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti, FloridaDepartment ofHealthandRehabilitative Services.
eiWkn-r h+~eSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))COUNTYOFST.LUCIE)SS~J.A.Stallbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident, St.LuciePlant,fortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower&LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;That.hehasexecutedtheforegoing document; thatthestatements madeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge, information andbelief,andthatheisauthorized toexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.
J.A.StallSTATEOFFLORIDAaCOUNTYOF+LACIWSworntoandsubscribed beforemethis~dayoffAbyJ.A.Stall,whoispersonally knowntome.A3hW~~Signature ofaryPublic-State ofFloridaLesl10J.WhltWeIIas::asMYCOMMISSION ICC646183EXPIRESMay12,2001"4jv'ij%'NEDTHRU TR0YFANssURAcE,INc,NameofNotaryPublic(Print,Type,orStamp)
MA~1-a'III/plI1I' St.LucieUnit1andUnit2Docket:Nos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES
~M~Ar~I-
,~)I1i%<<I4St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.'0-335 and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page1of16EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESTheproposedamendments toFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67forSt.LucieUnit1(PSL1)andNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willimproveconsistency throughout theTechnical Specifications (TS)andtheirrelatedBasesbyremovingoutdatedmaterial, incorporating minorchangesintextforpurposesofclarification, makingeditorial corrections, andresolving otherinconsistencies identified bytheplantoperations staff.Copies'oftheaffectedTSpages,marked-up toshowtheproposedchanges,arecontained inAttachment 3.a.Thefollowing revisions willimproveconsistency withinthePSL1TSbydeletingoutdatedmaterial, deletingorcorrecting improperreferences, andcorrecting spellingandothertypographic errors.(1)On~~II:IntheHQ~Hcolumnofthisindex,thefirstsectionnumberlistedis"3/7.7.2" whichcontainsatypographic error.Rg~toread,"3/4.7.2."
thirdline,Zgy~!theimproperspelling"concentation" toread"concentration."
thebottomofthepage,pe~superseded Amendment No."63"toread,"M."Thistypographic errorwasintroduced whenthepagewasre-typedforAmendment 150."i'hrough
...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-4through...havebeendeleted."
Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 149,i.e.,page3/46-3hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS.:a"''""f'hrough
...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-22through...havebeendeleted."
Thistypographic error
~~hI~
4(%~10St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page2of16wasintroduced inAmendment 149,i.e.,Page3/46-20hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS.(6)Onstatement, 3~1~3~2~Insertion 27.InSPECIALTESTEXCEPTIONS andintheassociated 401~theoutdatedreference toSpecification Specification 3.1.3.2,PartLengthCEALimits,wasremovedfromtheTSbyAmendment (7)OnEXPLOSIVE GASMIXTUREtoread,"Theconcentration ofoxygeninthewastegasdecaytankshallbedetermined tobewithintheabovelimitsbycontinuously monitoring thewastegasesintheon-service wastegasdecaytank~~IISpecification 3.3.3.10, EXPLOSIVE GASMONITORING SYSTEM,andassociated Table3.3-13weredeletedfromtheTSbyAmendment 147.TheproposedrevisiontoSurveillance 4.11.2.5.1 doesnotaltertherequirement tocontinuously monitoroxygenintheon-service wastegasdecaytank.(8)OnUndertheheadinginthesecondlineofthefirstparagraph, gyZj~theimproperreference to"10CFRAppendixG"toread,"10CFR50,AppendixG."Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 81.(9)On~~:Undertheheading,inthesecondparagraph, gjlaZ~thenumber"5.3.2"toread"5.3.1.2."
Theexistingnumerical patternduplicates useoftheidentifier fororiginalSpecification 5.3.2shownonsubsequent page5-5undertheheading,aKIU!Ltd.
~ts~%rSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page3of16b.Thefollowing minorchangesintextareproposedforthepurposeofclarification, andtoassureconsistent implementation ofthestatedrequirements.
Tzpg>200Fpsentencetoread,UnderBORATIONCONTROL,SHUTDOWNMARGIN-,~Zj~thesecond"Iftheinoperable CEAisnotfullyinserted, andisimmovable asaresultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference orisknowntobeuntrippable, theaboverequiredSHUTDOWNMARGINshallbeincreased byanamountatleastequaltothewithdrawn worthoftheimmovable oruntrippable CEA(s)."Thissurveillance requirestheSHUTDOWNMARGIN(SDM)tobedetermined withinonehourafterdetection ofaninoperable CEA(s)andatleastonceper12hoursthereafter whiletheCEA(s)isinoperable.
IfoneormoreCEAsbecomeimmovable asa.resultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference, orknowntobeuntrippable, Specification 3.1.3.1.a prohibits continued reactoroperation.
TheSDMrequiredbyTS3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1 isconservatively increased byanamountattelsinceitislikelytheaffectedCEA(s)wouldnotinsertonareactortripsignal.Thisaction,inadditiontoassumingthattheCEAofhighestreactivity worthisfullywithdrawn per'S1.29,ensuresthatadequateshutdownreactivity isavailable consistent withthesafetyanalyses.
Theproposedchangeintextaddsmodifiers totheconditions ofimmovable anduntrippable consistent withthesesameconditions addressed inACTION3.1.3.1.a forMovableControlAssemblies/Full LengthCEAPosition, andmakesclearthatthespecified SDMneednotbeincreased byanadditional amountcorresponding tothewithdrawn worthoftheaffectedCEA(s)iftheaffectedCEA(s)isfullyinserted.
ThisrevisiondoesnotaltertheintentofSurveillance 4.1.1.1.1.a andimprovesconsistency withintheTS.
lE.~~
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2-DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page4of16(2)OnIntheBORATIONSYSTEMS,FLOWPATHS-SHUTDOWN andCHARGINGPUMPS-SHUTDOWN read,"...(b)RCSpressureboundaryintegrity existsandnochargingpumpsareoperable."
Footnote*wasestablished byAmendment 60andsubsequently modifiedbyAmendments 81,104,and141,andprovidestheplantconditions forwhichaHighPressureSafetyInjection Pumpmaybeusedtoestablish aborationflowpathfromtheRefueling WaterTanktotheRCSinMODES5and6.Theconditions arebasedonassumptions andconditions evaluated intheanalysisforlowtemperature overpressureprotection (LTOP)andensurethattheLTOPsetpoints remainvalid.IfRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists,theadditional restrictions onchargingpumps,heatupandcooldownrates,andHPSIheaderisolation valvesspecified inthefootnotearerequired.
Ifpressureboundaryintegrity doesnotexist,asdefinedinTS1.16,theserestrictions arenotrequired.
Theproposedrevisiontopart(b)ofthefootnoteprovidesfurtherclarification thatpart(b)onlyappliestothecasewhereRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists.(3)ELENGTHCEAPOSITIONtoread,forFULL"b)TheSHUTDOWNMARGINrequirement ofSpecification 3.1.1.1isdetermined atleastonceper12hours.gagasastand-alone statement to"Otherwise, beinatleastHOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6hours"Repositioning thetextremovesanambiguity fromtheexistingconstruction inthattherequiredunittransition toHOTSTANDBYisrequiredifbothACTION3.1.3.1.d.l and3.1.3.1.d.2 arenotmet,e.g.,thestatement appliestofailuretocompleteACTIONdasawholeratherthanonlyfailuretocompletepartd.2.b).Thisrevisionisconsistent withthecorresponding TS3.1.3.1.f forPSL2.Inaddition, addingtheword"next" I,2~
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page5of16makesclearthatthe6houractioncompletion timebeginsuponfailuretosatisfyACTION3.1.3.1.d, andisconsistent withNUREG-1432, Revision1.(4)LENGTHCEAPOSITIONSpecification,
~thestand-alone statement, "Otherwise, beinat'eastHOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6hours."Addingtheproposedstatement ensuresthat,uponfailuretocomplywithACTION3.1.3.1.f, actionswillbetakentoplacetheunitinaModeforwhichtheLCOnolongerapplies,andwithoutaneedtoinvokeSpecification 3.0.3.Theactionandcompletion timeareconsistent withtherequirements ofNUREG-1432, Revision1.(5)/*toread,"WhentheflowpathfromtheRWTtotheRCSviaasingleHPSIpumpisestablished per3.1.2.1or3.1.2.3andRCSpressureboundaryintegrity exists,theheatupandcooldownratesshallbeestablished inaccordance withFig.3.1-lbFootnote*wasestablished byAmendment 81tosupportTS3.1.2.1and3.1.2.3.Thesespecifications limittheheatupandcooldownratesperFigure3.1-1bonlyforthecondition ofapplicability inwhichaflowpathfromtheRWTtotheRCSviaaHPSIpumpisestablished pressureboundaryintegrity exists.Ifpressureboundaryintegrity doesnotexistasdefinedinTS1.16,thenFigure3.1-1bdoesnotapply.TheproposedrevisiontoFootnote*ofTS3.4.9.1conformswiththerequirements providedinTS3.1.2.1and3.1.2.3forusingthereferenced Figure3.1-lb,andtherebyremovestheexistingambiguity andimprovesconsistency withinthefacilityTS.
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page6of16(6)On-:UnderCONTAINMENT SYSTEMS,VACUUMRELIEFVALVES,Zg~Specification 3.6.5.1toread,"Thecontainment vesseltoannulusvacuumreliefvalvesThewords"lessthanorequalto"inconjunction with"+0.25"createanambiguous syntax.FPLreviewedthevacuumreliefvalvesetpointcalculations, andconfirmed thatthewords"lessthanorequalto"werenotappropriate whenconsidering thenominaldesignvaluesassumedintheanalysisforinadvertent containment sprayactuation (UpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport,Section6.2).Theproposedrevisionwillremovetheerroneous phraseintroduced inAmendment 90,andmaketheSpecification consistent withtheassociated Surveillance 4.6.5.1.(7)PENETRATIONS, Zey~,Specification 3.9.4.ctoread,"Eachpenetration providing directaccessfromthecontainment atmosphere totheoutsideatmosphere shall-beeither:",
andZg~kacondition 3.9.4.c.i toread,"Closedbyanisolation valve,blindflange,ormanualvalve,exceptforvaZvesthatareopenonanintermittent basisunderadministrative controlor"Thereferenced Table3.6-2,CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES,contained aprovision (footnote
- )foropeningcertainnormallyclosedvalvesonanintermittent basisunderadministrative control.TSAmendment 149,whichincorporated theprovisions ofGenericLetter(GL)91-08,deletedTable3.6-2fromthefacilityTS.GL91-08didnotspecifically addresstheRefueling Operations TS3.9.4.However,itwasrecognized thatthelistofcontainment isolation valves,e.g.,Table3.6-2,typically includesfootnotes thatmodifytheTSrequirements forthesevalvesandalsoaddressoperational considerations forspecificvalvesthatmay
- k.
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page7of16beopenedonanintermittent basisunderadministrative control.Moreover, GL91-08states,"Suchnotesmustbeincorporated intotheassociated LCOsothattheywillremainineffectwhenthetablecontaining thesefootnotes isremovedfromtheTS."TheproposedrevisiontoTS3.9.4deletestheoutdatedreference toTable3.6-2,incorporates theassociated provision forintermittent operation ofvalvesunderadministrative controlthatwascontained infootnote*tothattable,andisconsistent withGL91-08.CRANEOPERABILITY, 403~thelastsentenceofMPH,whichstates,"Theprovisions ofSpecification 3.0.3arenot.applicable.",
andgg>~thelastlineoftoread,"...cutoffwhenbeforethecraneloadexceeds3000pounds."TheACTIONstatement reference toSpecification 3.0.3isoutdatedandredundant, i.e.,TS3.9.6isonlyapplicable duringrefueling operations andSpecification 3.0.3,bydefinition, isnotapplicable inthisMode.TS3.9.6requiresthemanipulator craneoverloadcutofflimittobes3000pounds.TheexistingSurveillance requiresademonstration oftheloadcutoff"when"thecraneload~~h3000pounds.TheproposedrevisionmakesSurveillance 4.9.6consistent withtheLCO.c~Thefollowing revisions willupdatetheTSBasesasindicated.
(1)On"Thespecified setpointprovidesallowance thattherewillbesufficient waterinventory inthesteamrequiredsufficienttimeforanyoperatoractiontoinitiateauxiliaryfeedwater beforereactorcoolantsystemsubcooling islost."
~PSt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page8of16Therevisionmoreaccurately reflectstheacceptance criteriaassociated withthisreactortripsetpointwhichrequiresthatthereactorcoolantremainsubcooled forthelimitinglossoffeedwater transients.
Therevisionisconsistent withtheSt.LucieUnit1safetyanalysesasreportedintheUpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR).(2)Ony,theBasestoread,"TheRateofChangeofprotectthecoreduringservesasabackuptostartupratelimit.~~Power-High tripisprovidedtostartupoperations anditsusetheadministratively enforcedSystem-.Thetripisnotcreditedinanydesignbasisaccidentevaluated inUFSARChapter25ghowever,thetripisconsidered inthesafetyanalysisinthatthepresenceofthistripfunctionprecluded theneedforspecificanalysesofothereventsinitiated fromsubcriticalconditions."Therevisionmoreaccurately describes therelationbetweenthisreactorprotection systemtripfunctionandtheplantsafetyanalyses.
Therevisionisconsistent withABBCombustion Engineering TechNoteNo.96-04,issuedAugust14,1996,whichwasconfirmed byFPLtobeapplicable toSt.LucieUnit1.(3)OnUndertheheadingXg~thesecondparagraph toread,Therestrictions associated withtheestablishing oftheflowpathfromtheRWTtotheRCSviaasingleHPSIpumpprovideassurance thatZOCFR50AppendixGpressure/temperature limitswillnotbeexceededinthecaseofanyinadvertent pressuretransient duetoamassadditiontotheRCS.IfRCSpressureboundaryintegrity doesnotexistasdefinedinSpecification 1.26,theserestrictions arenotrequired.
Additionally, alimitonthemaximumnumberofoperableHPSIpumpsisnotnecessary whenthepressurizer manwaycoveror.thereactorvesselheadisremoved.
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments
~~L-97-134Attachment 1Page9of16Therevisions provideadditional clarification insupportofthefootnotes associated withTS3.1.2.1and3.1.2.3.andareconsistent withtheSt.LucieUnit1LTOPanalysis.
Inaddition, LTOPeventswitheitherthepressurizer manway.coverorthereactorvesselheadremovedarenotcredible.
(4)On~thefollowing paragraph, "Inaccordance withGenericLetter91-08,RemovalofComponent ListsfromtheTechnical Specifications, theopeningoflockedorsealedclosedcontainment isolation valvesonanintermittentbasisunderadministrativecontrolincludesthefollowing considerations:
(2)stationing anoperator, whoisinconstantcommunication withthecontrolroom,atthevalvecontrols, (2)instructing thisoperatortoclosethesevalvesinanaccidentsituation, and(3)assuringthatenvironmental.
conditions willnotprecludeaccesstoclosethevalvesandthatthisactionwillpreventthereleaseofradioactivity outsidethecontainment."
Thisparagraph supportstheproposedrevisiontoTS3.9.4(item1.b(7)ofthisevaluation),
andisconsistent withGL91-08.ENDOFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESFORPSL1 EJ~~Ptlt'r St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page10of162~CopiesoftheaffectedTSpages,marked-up toshowtheproposedchanges,arecontained inAttachment 4.a.Thefollowing revisions willimproveconsistency withinthePSL2TSbydeletingoutdatedmaterial, deletingorcorrecting improperreferences, andcorrecting othertypographic errors.ENGINEERING GROUP,"andassociated subsections, andIZIlmhaZthesubsequent Qg~gtoread,"6.W6.2o3SHIFTTECHNICAL ADVISOR"Theindicated SectionswerechangedbyAmendment 69.(2)On~~(:Under6.5.2COMPANYNUCLEARREVIEWBOARD,gL44thesection,"TECHNICAL REVIEWRESPONSIBILITIES oo~oooo~622ThissectionwasaddedtotheTSbyAmendment 69.(3)Onllitiillioo from"1"toread"2/Train."
Thistypographic errorwasmadeintheoriginallicense.TheECCSareaventilation systemisdesignedwithtwoindependent trainsandtherevisionwillminimizethepotential foranunmonitored noblegaseffluentrelease.Therevisionisconsistent withtheformatshownforthecorresponding monitorsinthePSL1TS.oi""'ithrough...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-4through...havebeendeleted."
Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 88,i.e.,page3/46-3hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS.Eo'"I21through...havebeendeleted"toread"Pages3/46-22through...havebeendeleted."
Thistypographic errorwasintroduced inAmendment 88,i.e.,Page3/46-21hasnotbeendeletedfromtheTS.
~~k St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page11of16(6)word"that."IntheThisgrammatical errorwasintroduced byAmendment 39.(7)OnRQKikgEXPLOSIVE GASMIXTUREtoread,"Theconcentration ofoxygeninthewastegasdecaytankshallbedetermined tobewithintheabovelimitsbycontinuosly monitoring thewastegasesintheon-service wastegasdecaytankSpecification 3.3.3.10, EXPLOSIVE GASMONITORING SYSTEM,andassociated Table3.3-13weredeletedfromtheTSbyAmendment 86.TheproposedrevisiontoSurveillance 4.11.2.5.1 doesnotaltertherequirement tocontinuously monitoroxygenintheon-service wastegasdecaytank.b.Thefollowing minorchangesintextareproposedforthepurposeofclarification, andtoassureconsistent implementation ofthestatedrequirements.
TzpgGREATERTHAN200Fgthesecondsentencetoread,"Iftheinoperable CEAisnotSullyinserted, andisimmovable asaresultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference orisknowntobeuntrippable, theaboverequiredSHUTDOWNMARGINshallbeverifiedacceptable withanincreased allowance forthewithdrawn worthoftheimmovable oruntrippable CEA(s)."Thissurveillance requirestheSHUTDOWNMARGIN(SDM)tobedetermined withinonehourafterdetection ofaninoperable CEA(s)andatleastonceper12hoursthereafter whiletheCEA(s)isinoperable.
IfoneormoreCEAsbecomeimmovable asaresultofexcessive frictionormechanical interference, orknowntobeuntrippable, Specification 3.1.3.1.a prohibits continued reactoroperation.
TheSDMrequiredbyTS3.1.1.1/4.1.1.1.1 isconservatively increased byanamountatthdsinceitislikelytheaffectedCEA(s)wouldnotinsert St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page12of16onareactortripsignal.Thisaction,inadditiontoassumingthattheCEAofhighestreactivity worthisfullywithdrawn perTS1.29,ensuresthatadequateshutdownreactivity isavailable consistent withthesafetyanalyses.
Theproposedchangeintextaddsmodifiers totheconditions ofimmovable anduntrippable consistent withthesesameconditions addressed inACTION3.1.3.1.a forMovableControlAssemblies/CEA
- Position, andmakesclearthatthespecified SDMneednotbeincreased byanadditional amountcorresponding tothewithdrawn worthoftheaffectedCEA(s)iftheaffectedCEA(s)isfullyinserted.
ThisrevisiondoesnotaltertheintentofSurveillance 4.1.1.1.1.a andimprovesconsistency withintheTS.(2)POSITIONSpecification,
~thestand-alone statement, "Otherwise, heinatleastIIOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6'ours.",andZgZig~kthefinalstatement ofML[QH3.1.3.1.f toread,"Otherwise, beinatleastHOTSTANDBYwithinthenext6hours."Addingtheproposedstatement toACTION3.1.3.1.e ensuresthat,uponfailuretocomplywiththeACTION,theunitwillbeplacedinaModeforwhichtheLCOnolongerapplies,andwithoutaneedtoinvokeSpecification 3.0.3.Thisstatement wasinadvertently deletedbyAmendment 8.Addingtheword"next"tothestatement inbothcasesmakesclearthatthecompletion timebeginsuponfailuretosatisfythespecified ACTIONS.Theactionstatement, andspecified completion timeareconsistent withrequirements ofNUREG-1432, Revision1.(3):I~?'~withanasterisktoread,"TheReactorCoolantSystemtotalflowrateshallbedetermined tobewithinitslimitbymeasurement*
atleastonceper18months.",
andajarthefollowing footnote:
a.)e't1 St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page13of16*Notrequiredtobeperformed untilTHERMALONERisz904ofKLVEDTHERMALPCNER.Thesurveillance isapplicable duringoperational MODE1,andtheflowratemeasurement i.sperformed bycalorimetric heatbalance.Theproposedfootnoteisnecessary toallowmeasurement oftheflowrateatnormaloperating conditions inMODE1sincethesurveillance cannotbeperformed inMODE2orbelow,andwillnotyieldaccurateresultsifperformed below904ofratedthermalpower.Thisrevisionisconsistent withcorresponding SR3.4.1.4ofNUREG-1432, Revision1,andwithcorresponding Surveillance 4.2.5.2ofthePSL1TS.(4)RELIEFVALVES,gag~Specification 3.6.5toread,"Theprimarycontainment vesseltoannulusvacuumreliefvalvesshallbeOPERABLEwithanactuation setpointof9.85+0.35inchesWaterGauge."Thewords"lessthanorequalto"inconjunction with"+0.35"createanambiguous syntax.FPLreviewedthevacuumreliefvalvesetpointcalculations, andconfirmed thatthewords"lessthanorequalto"werenotappropriate whenconsidering thenominaldesignvaluesassumedintheanalysisforinadvertent containment sprayactuation (UFSAR,Section6.2).Theproposedrevisionwillremovetheerroneous phrasewhichwasintroduced inAmendment 60.(5)CRANE,za~thelastlineoftoread,whenbeforethecraneloadexceeds3000pounds."TS3.9.6requiresthemanipulator craneoverloadcutofflimittobelessthanorequalto3000pounds.TheexistingSurveillance requiresademonstration oftheloadcutoff"when"thecraneloadgzggg~3000pounds.TheproposedrevisionmakesSurveillance 4.9.6consistent withtheLCO.
4e~${,1St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments
~~L-97-134Attachment 1Page14of16c~Thefollowing revisions willupdatetheTSBasesasindicated.
inthethirdparagraph, firstsentence,
@langthenumerical valueoftheDNB-SAFDL from1.20to1.28.TherevisionupdatesthisBasessectionwiththe.reference DNBRlimitvaluethatiscurrently usedintheExtendedStatistical Combination ofUncertainties (ESCU)cyclespecificsetpointanalysesforPSL2.Thereference DNBRlimitvalueof1.28inconjunction withESCUcorresponds toa954probability ata954confidence levelthatdeparture fromnucleateboilingwillnotoccurduringsteadystateoperation, normaloperational transients, andanticipated transients.
Therevisionisconsistent withtheminimumDNBRvaluereportedinthePSL2UFSAR(Amendment 10,7/96).(2)firstsentence, phd~thenumerical valueoftheDNB-SAFDL from1.20to1.28,andXa~thethirdparagraph toread,"TheThermalMargin/Low Pressuretripsetpoints arederivedfromthecoresafetylimitsthroughapplication ofappropriate allowances forequipment responsetime,measurement uncertainties andprocessing error.~zrfetyTheallowances includes:
anvariable(powerdependent) allowance tocompensate forpotential powerforpotential temperature measurement uncertainty; andemeasurement error;andanallowance tocompensate forthetimedelayassociated withproviding effective termination oftheoccurrence thatexhibitsthemostrapiddecreaseinmargintothesafetylimit.The-~TherevisiontotheDNB-SAFDL numerical valueisconsistent withtheminimumDNBRvalue.reportedinthePSL2UFSAR(Amendment 10,7/96),andisdiscussed initem2.c.(1)preceding.
sa)~IlI't.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page15of16TheThermalMargin/Low Pressure(TM/LP)reactortripsetpoints areverifiedaspartofthecycle-specific setpointanalysesperformed foreachfuelreload,whichisevaluated under10CFR50.59.Individual parameter valuesmaybeadjusted, withinlimits,tooptimizeanalytical andoperating marginsprovidedbythesetpoints.
Removingthenumerical valuesassociated withtheequipment responsetimemeasurement uncertainties andprocessing errorswillprecludetheneedforunnecessary Basesrevisions asaresultofminoradjustments thatcanbemadetosuchvaluesforreloadcoredesigns.Therevisionisconsistent withthesummarybasesstatements contained inthePSL1TSBaseswhichonlydescribethetypesofallowances considered fortheTM/LPsetpoints.
(3)Lgz,Zg~thesecondsentencetoread,"Thisspecified setpointprovidesallowance thattherewillbesufficient waterinventory inthesteamgenerator atthetimeofthetriptoprovidesufficient timeforanyoperatoraction'oinitiateauxiliary feedwater beforereactorcoolantsystemsubcooling islost."Therevisionmoreaccurately reflectstheacceptance criteriaassociated withthisreactortripsetpointwhichrequiresthatthereactorcoolantremainsubcooled forthelimitinglossoffeedwater transients.
Therevisionisconsistent withtheSt.LucieUnit2safetyanalysesasreportedintheUFSAR.I(4)On"TheRateofChangeofprotectthecoreduringservesasabackuptostartupratelimit.~~Power-High tripisprovidedtostartupoperations anditsusetheadministratively enforcedSystem-.Thetripisnotcreditedinanydesignbasisaccidentevaluated inUFSARChapter25ghovever,thetripisconsidered inthesafetyanalysisinthatthepresence St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 1Page16of16ofthistripfunctionprecluded theneedforspecificanalysesofothereventsinitiatedfromsubcriticalconditions."Therevisionmoreaccurately describes therelationbetweenthisreactorprotection systemtripfunctionandtheplantsafetyanalyses.
Therevisionisconsistent withABBCombustion Engineering TechNoteNo.96-04,issuedAugust14,1996,whichwasconfirmed byFPLtobeapplicable toSt.LucieUnit2.(5)OnRhMEXEeanumerical valueoftheminimumDNBRfrom1.20to1.28.Therevisionisconsistent withtheminimumDNBRvaluereportedinthePSL2UFSAR(Amendment 10,7/96),andisdiscussed initem2.c.(1)preceding.
Theproposedchangeswillimplement minorchangesintexttorectifyreference, typographic,
- omission, spelling, and/orconsistency-in-format errors.ChangesinwordingproposedfortheBasesSectionsrectifyerrorsinstatedparameters and/orerrorsofcontradiction inordertomoreaccurately reflecttheactualbasesfortheassociated LCOs.Thechangesareadministrative innatureandwillimproveconsistency withintheTSforeachunit.
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION 4~~St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 2Page1of2DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION Theproposedamendments willimproveconsistency throughout theTechnicalSpecifications andtheirrelatedBaseshyremovingoutdatedmaterial, incorporating minorchangesintext,makingeditorial corrections, andresolving otherinconsistencies identified bytheplantoperations staff.Pursuantto10CFR50.92, adetermination maybemadethataproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration ifoperation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussed asfollows:(1)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsecpxences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Theproposedamendments consistofadministrative changestotheTechnical Specifications (TS)forSt.LucieUnits1and2.Theamendments will.implement minorchangesintexttorectifyreference, typographic,
- spelling, and/orconsistency-in-format errors;updatetheTSBases;and/orotherwise improveconsistency withintheTSforeachunit.Theproposedamendments donotinvolvechangestotheconfiguration ormethodofoperation ofplantequipment thatisusedtomitigatetheconsequences ofanaccident, nordothechangesotherwise affecttheinitialconditions orconservatisms assumedinanyoftheplantaccidentanalyses.
Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendments wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
~~
a*IISt.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments L-97-134Attachment 2Page2of2(2)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Theproposedadministrative revisions willnotchangethephysicalplantorthemodesofplantoperation definedintheFacilityLicenseforeachunit.Thechangesdonotinvolvetheadditionormodification ofequipment nordotheyalterthedesignoroperation ofplantsystems.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendments wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
(3)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Theproposedamendments areadministrative innatureanddonotchangethebasisforanytechnical specification thatisrelatedtotheestablishment of,orthepreservation of,anuclearsafetymargin.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendments wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedontheabovediscussion andthesupporting Evaluation ofTechnical Specification changes,FPLhasdetermined thattheproposedlicenseamendments involvenosignificant hazardsconsideration.
St.LucieUnit1andUnit2DocketNos.50-335and50-389ProposedLicenseAmendments ST~LUCZEUNZT1MARKED-UP TECHNICAL SPECZFZCATZON PAGESPagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePagePageVIIB2-6B2-83/41-13/41-43/41-83/41-123/41-213/41-223/42-93/44-213/46-33/46-203/46-263/49-43/49-63/410-23/411-14B3/41-3B3/44-15B3/49-15-4