ML17309A911: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:FioridaPower6LightCompany,6351S.OceanDrive,JensenBeach,FL34957December29,1997~L-97-28010CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAttn:DocumentControlDeskWashington,D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRRef:(1)LetterfromR.P.Croteau(NRC)toJ.H.Goldberg(FPL),TurkeyPointUnits3and4-IssuanceofAmendmentsRe:ImplementationofFPLNuclearPhysicsMethodology(TACNos.M91393andM91394;June9,1995.Pursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperatingLicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2byincorporatingtheattachedTechnicalSpecificationsrevisions.Theamendmentwillmodifyspecificationsforselectedcycle-specificreactorphysicsparameterssothattheyrefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperatingLimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Minoradministrativechangesarealsoincluded.TheproposedTSchangesconformtotheguidance.providedinGenericLetter88-16andareconsistentwiththeStandardTechnicalSpecificationsforCombustionEngineeringPlants(NUREG-1432,Revision1).Itisrequestedthattheproposedamendment,ifapproved,beissuedbyJuly31,1998.Attachment1isanevaluationoftheproposedTSchanges.Attachment2isthe"DeterminationofNoSignificantHazardsConsideration."Attachment3containsacopyoftheaffectedTSpagesmarked-uptoshowtheproposedchanges.Enclosure(1)istheSt.LucieUnit2,Cycle10,CoreOperatingLimitsReport.Enclosure(2)isSupplement1toFPL'sTopicalReportNF-TR-95-01,NuclearPhysicsMethodologyforReloadDesignofTurkeyPointandSt.LucieNuclearPlants,whichprovidescomparisonsbetweencorephysicspredictionsandactualoperatingdataforSt.LucieUnit2.TheoriginalreportreviewedbytheNRCstaff(Reference1)didnotcontainSt.LucieUnit2specificdata.ThesupplementisvoluntarilysubmittedtofurtherdemonstrateFPL'sabilitytoperformreloadcoredesignforthatunit.TheproposedamendmenthasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower&LightCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordancewith10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyoftheproposedamendmentisbeingforwardedtotheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestionsaboutthissubmittal.Verytrulyyours,p.o~"J.A.Stall,VicePresidentSt.LuciePlant980i060i8597i229PDRADQCK05000250PPDRanFPLGroupcompanylllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllll St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Page2JASIRLDAttachments
{{#Wiki_filter:FioridaPower6LightCompany,6351 S.OceanDrive,JensenBeach,FL34957December29,1997~L-97-28010CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRRef:(1)LetterfromR.P.Croteau(NRC)toJ.H.Goldberg(FPL),TurkeyPointUnits3and4-IssuanceofAmendments Re:Implementation ofFPLNuclearPhysicsMethodology (TACNos.M91393andM91394;June9,1995.Pursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperating LicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2byincorporating theattachedTechnical Specifications revisions.
Theamendment willmodifyspecifications forselectedcycle-specific reactorphysicsparameters sothattheyrefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Minoradministrative changesarealsoincluded.
TheproposedTSchangesconformtotheguidance.
providedinGenericLetter88-16andareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432, Revision1).Itisrequested thattheproposedamendment, ifapproved, beissuedbyJuly31,1998.Attachment 1isanevaluation oftheproposedTSchanges.Attachment 2isthe"Determination ofNoSignificant HazardsConsideration."
Attachment 3containsacopyoftheaffectedTSpagesmarked-up toshowtheproposedchanges.Enclosure (1)istheSt.LucieUnit2,Cycle10,CoreOperating LimitsReport.Enclosure (2)isSupplement 1toFPL'sTopicalReportNF-TR-95-01, NuclearPhysicsMethodology forReloadDesignofTurkeyPointandSt.LucieNuclearPlants,whichprovidescomparisons betweencorephysicspredictions andactualoperating dataforSt.LucieUnit2.TheoriginalreportreviewedbytheNRCstaff(Reference 1)didnotcontainSt.LucieUnit2specificdata.Thesupplement isvoluntarily submitted tofurtherdemonstrate FPL'sabilitytoperformreloadcoredesignforthatunit.Theproposedamendment hasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower&LightCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordance with10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyoftheproposedamendment isbeingforwarded totheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestions aboutthissubmittal.
Verytrulyyours,p.o~"J.A.Stall,VicePresident St.LuciePlant980i060i85 97i229PDRADQCK05000250PPDRanFPLGroupcompanylllllllllllllllll illllllllllllllllll St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Page2JASIRLDAttachments


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
(1)St.LucieUnit2,Cycle10,CoreOperatingLimitsReport,Revision0.(2)NuclearPhysicsMethodologyforReloadDesignofTurkeyPointandSt.LucieNuclearPlants,NF-TR-95-01,Supplement1;August,1997.cc:RegionalAdministrator,RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector,USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti,FloridaDepartmentofHealthandRehabilitativeServices.
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))ss.COUNTYOFST.LUCIEJ.A.Stallbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident,St.LuciePlant,fortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower8LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoingdocument;thatthestatementsmadeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge,informationandbelief,andthatheisauthorizedtoexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.J.A.StallSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOFSworntoandsubscribedbeforemethis~dayofOd08Ã58(byJ.A.Stall,whoispersonallyknowntome.SignatureofNotaublic-StateofFloridaLeslieJ.WMtwem~ss~:>>iNCOMMiSSiONfCCQ61S3EXPIAEShby12,2001'~i,~",~4'0NOEDllRUTteyfhN$5URAHCE,INC.NameofNotaryPublic(Print,Type,orStamp)
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRATTACHMENT1toL-97-280EVALUATIONOFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES


St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97>>280Attachment1Page1of4EVALUATIONOFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroductionTheproposedamendmenttoFacilityOperatingLicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willmodifyTechnicalSpecifications(TS)forselectedcycle-specificreactorphysicsparameterssothattheyrefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperatingLimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Minoradministrativechangesarealsoincluded.TherevisionsconformtotheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter(GL)88-16andareconsistentwiththeStandardTechnicalSpecificationsforCombustionEngineeringPlants(NUREG-1432,Revision1).TheproposedTSchangesortheCOLRdonotalterthevalueofanyoftheexistingparameterlimits,andtheamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsideration.BackroundAnumberofTSincludecycle-specificoperatinglimitsforreactorphysicsparametersthataresubjecttochangeasafunctionofreloadcoredesign,andtheanalyticalmethodsusedtodeterminesuchlimitsaretypicallydocumentedinTopicalReportsorinplant-specificsubmittalspreviouslyreviewedandapprovedbytheNRCstaff.Asaconsequence,thestaffsreviewofproposedchangestotheselimitsprimarilyinvolvesconfirmationthattheupdatedlimitsarecalculatedusinganNRCapprovedmethodologyandareconsistentwithallapplicablelimitsofthesafetyanalyses.Inordertoeliminatetheburdenthatisassociatedwiththeprocessforrequesting,reviewing,andapprovingalicenseamendmentsolelyforthepurposeofupdatingthecalculatedvaluesofcycle-specificparameterlimits,GL88-16encouragedlicenseestoproposechangestotheirtechnicalspecificationsthatareconsistentwiththeguidanceprovidedinthatletter.Threeseparateactionstomodifytheplant'sTSarediscussedinGL88-16:(1)addingadefinitionofanamedformalreport,e.g.,COLR,thatincludesthevaluesofcycle-specificparameterlimitsthathavebeenestablishedusinganNRCapprovedmethodologyandareconsistentwithallapplicablelimitsofthesafetyanalyses,(2)theadditionofanadministrativereportingrequirementtosubmittheformalreporttotheCommissionforinformation,and(3)themodificationofindividualTStonotethatcycle-specificparametersshallbemaintainedwithinthelimitsprovidedinthedefinedformalreport.TheNRCstaffnotedthat"itisessentialtosafetythattheplantisoperatedwithintheboundsofcycle-specificparameterlimitsandthatarequirementtomaintaintheplantwithintheappropriateboundsmustberetainedintheTS.However,thespecificvaluesoftheselimitsmaybemodifiedbylicensees,withoutaffectingnuclearsafety,providedthatthesechangesaredeterminedusinganNRC-approvedmethodologyand[are]consistentwithallapplicablelimitsoftheplantsafetyanalysisthatareaddressedintheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)."TheconceptofaCOLRandtheprovisionsofGL88-16wereincorporatedintotheimprovedStandardTechnicalSpecificationsforCombustionEngineeringPlants(NUREG-1432).DescritionofChanesModificationstoindividualspecificationsincludereplacingtheapplicableoperatinglimitswithreferencestotheCOLR,deletingapplicablefigures,addingtherequireddefinitionandadministrativecontrols,andmakingeditorialchangesasnecessaryforthepurposeofclarificationand/or St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment1Page2of4consistency.CopiesoftheaffectedTSpages,marked-uptoshowtheproposedchanges,arecontainedinAttachment3tothissubmittal.Section1.0DEFINITIONSAddnewdefinition1.9a,COREOPERATINGLIMITSREPORTCOLR,showninInsert-AofAttachment3tothissubmittal.TS3.1.1.4MODERATORTEMPERATURECOEFFICIENTSpecification3.1.1.4.cisdeleted,andtheassociatedlimitofmaximumnegativemoderatortemperaturecoefficientatRATEDTHERMAL'OWERisrelocatedtotheCOLR.TS3/4.1.3MOVABLECONTROLASSEMBLIES-CEAPOSITIONFigure3.1-1a,AllowableTimetoRealignCEAvs.InitialFR~,specifyingthetimeconstraintforfullpoweroperationwithoneCEAmisalignedfromanyotherCEAinitsgroupbymorethan15inchesisdeletedfromTSandrelocatedtotheCOLR.TS3.1.3.6REGULATINGCEAINSERTIONLIMITSFigure3.1-2,%CEAInsertionvs.FractionofRatedThermalPower,showingtheregulatingCEAgroupswithdrawalsequenceandinsertionlimitsisdeletedfromTSandrelocatedtotheCOLR.TS3/4.2.1LINEARHEATRATEFigure3.2-1,AllowablePeakLinearHeatRatevs.Bumup;Figure3.2-2,AxialShapeIndexvs.FractionofMaximumAllowablePowerLevelperSpecification4.2.1.3;andFigure3.2-3,AllowableCombinationsofThermalPowerandFR',Fx',aredeletedfromTSandrelocatedtotheCOLR.Additionally,inSpecifications4.2.1.3and4.2.1.4,thephrase"monitoringthecorepowerdistribution"ischangedto"monitoringthelinearheatrate".S'32.2OTALPLANARRADIALPEAKINGFACTOS-F~ThecalculatedvaluefortheF~limitisdeletedfromTSandrelocatedtotheCOLR.TS3.23OTLINGTEDRDIALPKINGCOR-F~ThecalculatedvaluefortheF,~limit,andFigure3.2P,AxialShapeIndexOperatingLimitswithFourReactorCoolantPumpsOperating,aredeletedfromTSandrelocatedtotheCOLR.TS3.2.5DNBPARAMETERS-AXIALSHAPEINDEXTABLE3.2-2isrevisedtorefertoCOLRFigure3.2AfortheAXIALSHAPEINDEXlimit.
(1)St.LucieUnit2,Cycle10,CoreOperating LimitsReport,Revision0.(2)NuclearPhysicsMethodology forReloadDesignofTurkeyPointandSt.LucieNuclearPlants,NF-TR-95-01, Supplement 1;August,1997.cc:RegionalAdministrator, RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti, FloridaDepartment ofHealthandRehabilitative Services.
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment1Page3of4TS3/4.9.1REFUELINGOPERATIONS-BORONCONCENTRATIONTheboronconcentrationlimitsaredeletedfromtheTSandrelocatedtotheCOLR.BASES3/4.1.33/4.2.1and3/4.9.1ThebasesareupdatedtoreflectthechangestocorrespondingTSdescribedabove.Section6.0ADMINISTRATIVECONTROLS:Addnewadministrativecontrol,"6.9.1.11COREOPERATINGLIIMITSREPORT(COLR)"asshowninInsert-BofAttachment3tothissubmittal.Page3/41-19a,page3/41-28,pages3/424through3/42-6,andpage3/42-12willbedeletedfromtheTSsincethesepageswillbeblank.Anoteisaddedtopage3/42-3and3/42-11whichdocumentsdeletionoftheaffectedpagesandmaintainscontinuityofpagination.BasesfortheProosedTSChanesCycle-specificparameterlimitsestablishedintheCOLR(Enclosure1)havebeenrelocatedwithoutchangefromtheexistingTS.TheproposedamendmentwillallowFPLtomakechangestothelimitsestablishedintheCOLR,providedNRC-approvedmethodsareusedandthecalculatedparametervaluesareconsistentwithallapplicablelimitsoftheplantsafetyanalyses.Underthespecifiedconditions,suchchangescanbemadewithoutanadverseimpactonnuclearsafety.DEFINITION1.9aisaddedtotheSt.LucieUnit2TechnicalSpecificationstoformallydefinetheCoreOperatingLimitsReport(COLR).TheCOLRwillprovidecyclespecificreactorphysicsparameterlimitsforeachcurrentoperatingreloadcyclethatarenototherwiseretainedinindividualtechnicalspecifications.Accordingly,LimitingConditionsforOperation(LCO)3.1.1.4,ModeratorTemperatureCoefficient;3/4.1.3,MovableControlAssemblies-CEAPosition;3.1.3.6,RegulatingCEAInsertionLimits;3/4.2.1,LinearHeatRate;3.2.2,TotalPlanarRadialPeakingFactors;3.2.3,TotalIntegratedRadialPeakingFactor,3.2.5,DNBParameters;and3/4.9.1,RefuelingOperations-BoronConcentrationaremodifiedtoreplacethespecificvaluesofcycle-specificparameterlimitswiththeappropriatereferencetotheformallydefinedCOLR.Theaffectedspecificationsarealsomodified,asappropriate,torequirethattheplantbeoperatedwithintheboundsofthelimitsprovidedintheCOLR.TheproposedTSchangesconformtotheguidanceinGL88-16and,areconsistentwithNUREG-1432.Specification6.9.1.11isaddedtotheadministrativecontrolssectionand(a)requiresthecycle-specificlimitsfortheabovelistedLCOstobedocumentedintheCOLRpriortoeachreloadcycleorpriortoanyremainingportionofareloadcycle;(b)liststheapprovedanalyticalmethodsusedtodeterminethecoreoperatinglimits;(c)requiresthecoreoperatinglimitstobeconsistentwithapplicablelimitsofthesafetyanalyses;and(d)requirestheCOLR,includinganyrevisionsorsupplementsthereto,tobeprovideduponissuanceforeachreloadcycletotheNRC.TheproposedspecificationisconsistentwithGL88-16andNUREG-1432.
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))ss.COUNTYOFST.LUCIEJ.A.Stallbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident, St.LuciePlant,fortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower8LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoing document; thatthestatements madeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge, information andbelief,andthatheisauthorized toexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.
J.A.StallSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOFSworntoandsubscribed beforemethis~dayofOd08Ã58(byJ.A.Stall,whoispersonally knowntome.Signature ofNotaublic-State ofFloridaLeslieJ.WMtwem~ss~:>>iNCOMMiSSiON fCCQ61S3EXPIAEShby12,2001'~i,~",~4'0NOED llRUTteyfhN$5URAHCE,INC.NameofNotaryPublic(Print,Type,orStamp)
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRATTACHMENT 1toL-97-280EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES


St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment1-Page4of4IncludedinthelistofdocumentsdescribingtheanalyticalmethodsisFPL'sTopicalReportNF-TR-95-01,"NuclearPhysicsMethodologyforReloadDesignofTurkeyPoint&St.LucieNuclearPlants,"January,1995.ThetopicalreportwasapprovedasanacceptablereferenceintheCOLRandassociatedTSforFPL'sTurkeyPointPlants(Reference1),andforSt.LucieUnit1inAmendmentNo.150(4/1/97)toFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67.ThetopicalreportdescribestheWestinghouseElectricCorporation(W}nucleardesignmethodsandcomputerprogramsavailableatFPLforwhichFPLhasreceivedextensivetraining.ForPSL2,thesafetyanalysismethodsofAseaBrownBoveri-CombustionEngineering(ABB-CE)andthenucleardesignmethodsofWareused,whereappropriate,indefiningthespecifiedCOLRparameterlimits.ThesafetyanalysisisperformedbyABB-CEwiththeNRCapprovedcomputercodes.ThegenerationofphysicsinputtothesafetyanalysisisaccomplishedbyeitherABB-CEusingtheircodesorbyFPLusingtheNRCapprovedWcomputercodes.SinceNF-TR-95-01didnotincludeanybenchmarkdataforPSL2,Supplement1(August1997)totheTopicalReportisprovidedasEnclosure2tothissubmittaltofurtherdemonstrateFPL'sabilitytoperformreloadcoredesignforSt.LucieUnit2.ThepredictionsofphysicsparametersusingtheWmethodsshowgoodagreementwhencomparedtotheSt.LucieUnit2measureddata.InTS4.2.1.3and4.2.1.4,thephrase"corepowerdistribution"isreplacedwith"linearheatrate"tomoreaccuratelyreflectthemonitoredparameteraddressedbythesurveillancerequirements.Thisisanadministrativechangeanddoesnotalterthespecifiedrequirements.ConclusionTheproposedchangestotheTechnicalSpecificationsthathavecycle-specificparameterlimitsconformtotheguidelinesofGL88-16.ThevaluesoftheseparameterlimitsaredefinedintheCOLR.Inadditionto10CFR50.59,changestotheCOLRwillbecontrolledinaccordancewiththeproposedadministrativecontrolsinthissubmittalwhichrequiretheuseofNRC-approvedanalyticalmethodsandrequirethatallapplicablelimitsofthesafetyanalysesaremet.TheCOLR,includinganymid-cyclerevisionsorsupplementsthereto,shallbeprovidedtotheNRCuponissuance,foreachreloadcycle.Accountingforplantspecificdifferencesinformat,theproposedTSchangesareconsistentwiththeStandardTechnicalSpecificationsforCombustionEngineeringPlants.AsdiscussedinAttachment2tothissubmittal,theproposedlicenseamendmentdoesnotinvolveasignificanthazardsconsideration
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97>>280Attachment 1Page1of4EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroduction Theproposedamendment toFacilityOperating LicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willmodifyTechnical Specifications (TS)forselectedcycle-specific reactorphysicsparameters sothattheyrefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Minoradministrative changesarealsoincluded.
Therevisions conformtotheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter(GL)88-16andareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432, Revision1).TheproposedTSchangesortheCOLRdonotalterthevalueofanyoftheexistingparameter limits,andtheamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration.
BackroundAnumberofTSincludecycle-specific operating limitsforreactorphysicsparameters thataresubjecttochangeasafunctionofreloadcoredesign,andtheanalytical methodsusedtodetermine suchlimitsaretypically documented inTopicalReportsorinplant-specific submittals previously reviewedandapprovedbytheNRCstaff.Asaconsequence, thestaffsreviewofproposedchangestotheselimitsprimarily involvesconfirmation thattheupdatedlimitsarecalculated usinganNRCapprovedmethodology andareconsistent withallapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalyses.
Inordertoeliminate theburdenthatisassociated withtheprocessforrequesting, reviewing, andapproving alicenseamendment solelyforthepurposeofupdatingthecalculated valuesofcycle-specific parameter limits,GL88-16encouraged licensees toproposechangestotheirtechnical specifications thatareconsistent withtheguidanceprovidedinthatletter.Threeseparateactionstomodifytheplant'sTSarediscussed inGL88-16:(1)addingadefinition ofanamedformalreport,e.g.,COLR,thatincludesthevaluesofcycle-specific parameter limitsthathavebeenestablished usinganNRCapprovedmethodology andareconsistent withallapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalyses, (2)theadditionofanadministrative reporting requirement tosubmittheformalreporttotheCommission forinformation, and(3)themodification ofindividual TStonotethatcycle-specific parameters shallbemaintained withinthelimitsprovidedinthedefinedformalreport.TheNRCstaffnotedthat"itisessential tosafetythattheplantisoperatedwithintheboundsofcycle-specific parameter limitsandthatarequirement tomaintaintheplantwithintheappropriate boundsmustberetainedintheTS.However,thespecificvaluesoftheselimitsmaybemodifiedbylicensees, withoutaffecting nuclearsafety,providedthatthesechangesaredetermined usinganNRC-approved methodology and[are]consistent withallapplicable limitsoftheplantsafetyanalysisthatareaddressed intheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)."TheconceptofaCOLRandtheprovisions ofGL88-16wereincorporated intotheimprovedStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432).
DescritionofChanesModifications toindividual specifications includereplacing theapplicable operating limitswithreferences totheCOLR,deletingapplicable figures,addingtherequireddefinition andadministrative
: controls, andmakingeditorial changesasnecessary forthepurposeofclarification and/or St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 1Page2of4consistency.
CopiesoftheaffectedTSpages,marked-up toshowtheproposedchanges,arecontained inAttachment 3tothissubmittal.
Section1.0DEFINITIONS Addnewdefinition 1.9a,COREOPERATING LIMITSREPORTCOLR,showninInsert-AofAttachment 3tothissubmittal.
TS3.1.1.4MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT Specification 3.1.1.4.c isdeleted,andtheassociated limitofmaximumnegativemoderator temperature coefficient atRATEDTHERMAL'OWER isrelocated totheCOLR.TS3/4.1.3MOVABLECONTROLASSEMBLIES
-CEAPOSITIONFigure3.1-1a,Allowable TimetoRealignCEAvs.InitialFR~,specifying thetimeconstraint forfullpoweroperation withoneCEAmisaligned fromanyotherCEAinitsgroupbymorethan15inchesisdeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3.1.3.6REGULATING CEAINSERTION LIMITSFigure3.1-2,%CEAInsertion vs.FractionofRatedThermalPower,showingtheregulating CEAgroupswithdrawal sequenceandinsertion limitsisdeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3/4.2.1LINEARHEATRATEFigure3.2-1,Allowable PeakLinearHeatRatevs.Bumup;Figure3.2-2,AxialShapeIndexvs.FractionofMaximumAllowable PowerLevelperSpecification 4.2.1.3;andFigure3.2-3,Allowable Combinations ofThermalPowerandFR',Fx',aredeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.Additionally, inSpecifications 4.2.1.3and4.2.1.4,thephrase"monitoring thecorepowerdistribution" ischangedto"monitoring thelinearheatrate".S'32.2OTALPLANARRADIALPEAKINGFACTOS-F~Thecalculated valuefortheF~limitisdeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3.23OTLINGTEDRDIALPKINGCOR-F~Thecalculated valuefortheF,~limit,andFigure3.2P,AxialShapeIndexOperating LimitswithFourReactorCoolantPumpsOperating, aredeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3.2.5DNBPARAMETERS
-AXIALSHAPEINDEXTABLE3.2-2isrevisedtorefertoCOLRFigure3.2AfortheAXIALSHAPEINDEXlimit.
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 1Page3of4TS3/4.9.1REFUELING OPERATIONS
-BORONCONCENTRATION Theboronconcentration limitsaredeletedfromtheTSandrelocated totheCOLR.BASES3/4.1.33/4.2.1and3/4.9.1Thebasesareupdatedtoreflectthechangestocorresponding TSdescribed above.Section6.0ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS:
Addnewadministrative control,"6.9.1.11 COREOPERATING LIIMITSREPORT(COLR)"asshowninInsert-BofAttachment 3tothissubmittal.
Page3/41-19a,page3/41-28,pages3/424through3/42-6,andpage3/42-12willbedeletedfromtheTSsincethesepageswillbeblank.Anoteisaddedtopage3/42-3and3/42-11whichdocuments deletionoftheaffectedpagesandmaintains continuity ofpagination.
BasesfortheProosedTSChanesCycle-specific parameter limitsestablished intheCOLR(Enclosure 1)havebeenrelocated withoutchangefromtheexistingTS.Theproposedamendment willallowFPLtomakechangestothelimitsestablished intheCOLR,providedNRC-approved methodsareusedandthecalculated parameter valuesareconsistent withallapplicable limitsoftheplantsafetyanalyses.
Underthespecified conditions, suchchangescanbemadewithoutanadverseimpactonnuclearsafety.DEFINITION 1.9aisaddedtotheSt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications toformallydefinetheCoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR).TheCOLRwillprovidecyclespecificreactorphysicsparameter limitsforeachcurrentoperating reloadcyclethatarenototherwise retainedinindividual technical specifications.
Accordingly, LimitingConditions forOperation (LCO)3.1.1.4,Moderator Temperature Coefficient; 3/4.1.3,MovableControlAssemblies
-CEAPosition; 3.1.3.6,Regulating CEAInsertion Limits;3/4.2.1,LinearHeatRate;3.2.2,TotalPlanarRadialPeakingFactors;3.2.3,TotalIntegrated RadialPeakingFactor,3.2.5,DNBParameters; and3/4.9.1,Refueling Operations-BoronConcentration aremodifiedtoreplacethespecificvaluesofcycle-specific parameter limitswiththeappropriate reference totheformallydefinedCOLR.Theaffectedspecifications arealsomodified, asappropriate, torequirethattheplantbeoperatedwithintheboundsofthelimitsprovidedintheCOLR.TheproposedTSchangesconformtotheguidanceinGL88-16and,areconsistent withNUREG-1432.
Specification 6.9.1.11isaddedtotheadministrative controlssectionand(a)requiresthecycle-specificlimitsfortheabovelistedLCOstobedocumented intheCOLRpriortoeachreloadcycleorpriortoanyremaining portionofareloadcycle;(b)liststheapprovedanalytical methodsusedtodetermine thecoreoperating limits;(c)requiresthecoreoperating limitstobeconsistent withapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalyses; and(d)requirestheCOLR,including anyrevisions orsupplements thereto,tobeprovideduponissuanceforeachreloadcycletotheNRC.Theproposedspecification isconsistent withGL88-16andNUREG-1432.


St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRATTACHMENT2toL-97-280DETERMINATIONOFNOSIGNIFICANTHAZARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment2Page1of2DETERMINATIONOFNOSIGNIFICANTHAZARDSCONSIDERATIONDescrfpI/onofamendmentrequest:TheproposedamendmenttoFacilityOperatingLicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willmodifyspecificationsforselectedcycle-specificreactorphysicsparameterstorefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperatingLimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Editorialchangesarealsoincludedforpurposesofclarificationand/orconsistency.TheproposedTechnicalSpecification(TS)changesconformtotheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter88-16andareconsistentwiththeStandardTechnicalSpecificationsforCombustionEngineeringPlants(NUREG-1432,Revision1).Pursuantto10CFR50.92,adeterminationmaybemadethataproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsiderationifoperationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnot:(1)involveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(2)createthepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated;or(3)involveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussedasfollows:(1)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.Theproposedamendmentrelocatesthecalculatedvaluesofselectedcycle-speciTicreactorphysicsparameterlimitsfromtheTStotheCOLR,andincludesminoreditorialchangeswhichdonotaltertheintentofstatedrequirements.Theamendmentisadministrativeinnatureandhasnoimpactonanyplantconfigurationorsystemperformancereliedupontomitigatetheconsequencesofanaccident.ParameterlimitsspecifiedintheCOLRforthisamendmentarenotchangedfromthevaluespresentlyrequiredbyTechnicalSpecifications.FuturechangestothecalculatedvaluesofsuchlimitsmayonlybemadeusingNRCapprovedmethodologies,mustbeconsistentwithallapplicablesafetyanalysislimits,andarecontrolledbythe10CFR50.59process.Assumptionsusedforaccidentinitiatorsand/orsafetyanalysisacceptancecriteriaarenotchangedbythisamendment.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwillnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofanaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.(2)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.TheproposedamendmentrelocatesthecalculatedvaluesofcyclespecificreactorphysicslimitingparameterstotheCOLRandwillnotchangethephysicalplantorthemodesofoperationdefinedinthefacilitylicense.Thechangesdonotinvolvetheadditionofnewequipmentorthemodificationofexistingequipment,nordotheyalterthedesignconfigurationofSt.Lucieplantsystems.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotcreatethepossibilityofanewordifferentkindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviouslyevaluated.
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 1-Page4of4Includedinthelistofdocuments describing theanalytical methodsisFPL'sTopicalReportNF-TR-95-01,"NuclearPhysicsMethodology forReloadDesignofTurkeyPoint&St.LucieNuclearPlants,"January,1995.Thetopicalreportwasapprovedasanacceptable reference intheCOLRandassociated TSforFPL'sTurkeyPointPlants(Reference 1),andforSt.LucieUnit1inAmendment No.150(4/1/97)toFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67.Thetopicalreportdescribes theWestinghouse ElectricCorporation (W}nucleardesignmethodsandcomputerprogramsavailable atFPLforwhichFPLhasreceivedextensive training.
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendmentCore0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment2Page2of2(3)Operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.ThecyclespecificparameterlimitsbeingrelocatedtotheCOLRbythisamendmenthavenotbeenchangedfromthevaluespresentlyrequiredbytheTS,andarequirementtooperatetheplantwithintheboundsofthelimitsspecifiedintheCOLRisretainedintheindividualspecifications.FuturechangestothecalculatedvaluesoftheselimitsbythelicenseemayonlybedevelopedusingNRC-approvedmethodologies,mustremainconsistentwithallapplicableplantsafetyanalysislimitsaddressedintheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR),andarefurthercontrolledbythe10CFR50.59process.AsdiscussedinGenericLetter88-16,theadministrativecontrolsestablishedforthevaluesofcyclespecificparametersusingtheguidanceofthatletterassureconformancewith10CFR50.36.Safetyanalysisacceptancecriteriaarenotbeingalteredbythisamendment.Therefore,operationofthefacilityinaccordancewiththeproposedamendmentwouldnotinvolveasignificantreductioninamarginofsafety.BasedonthediscussionpresentedaboveandonthesupportingEvaluationofProposedTSChanges,FPLhasconcludedthatthisproposedlicenseamendmentinvolvesnosignificanthazardsconsideration.}}
ForPSL2,thesafetyanalysismethodsofAseaBrownBoveri-Combustion Engineering (ABB-CE)andthenucleardesignmethodsofWareused,whereappropriate, indefiningthespecified COLRparameter limits.Thesafetyanalysisisperformed byABB-CEwiththeNRCapprovedcomputercodes.Thegeneration ofphysicsinputtothesafetyanalysisisaccomplished byeitherABB-CEusingtheircodesorbyFPLusingtheNRCapprovedWcomputercodes.SinceNF-TR-95-01 didnotincludeanybenchmark dataforPSL2,Supplement 1(August1997)totheTopicalReportisprovidedasEnclosure 2tothissubmittal tofurtherdemonstrate FPL'sabilitytoperformreloadcoredesignforSt.LucieUnit2.Thepredictions ofphysicsparameters usingtheWmethodsshowgoodagreement whencomparedtotheSt.LucieUnit2measureddata.InTS4.2.1.3and4.2.1.4,thephrase"corepowerdistribution" isreplacedwith"linearheatrate"tomoreaccurately reflectthemonitored parameter addressed bythesurveillance requirements.
Thisisanadministrative changeanddoesnotalterthespecified requirements.
Conclusion TheproposedchangestotheTechnical Specifications thathavecycle-specific parameter limitsconformtotheguidelines ofGL88-16.Thevaluesoftheseparameter limitsaredefinedintheCOLR.Inadditionto10CFR50.59,changestotheCOLRwillbecontrolled inaccordance withtheproposedadministrative controlsinthissubmittal whichrequiretheuseofNRC-approved analytical methodsandrequirethatallapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalysesaremet.TheCOLR,including anymid-cycle revisions orsupplements thereto,shallbeprovidedtotheNRCuponissuance, foreachreloadcycle.Accounting forplantspecificdifferences informat,theproposedTSchangesareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants.Asdiscussed inAttachment 2tothissubmittal, theproposedlicenseamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration
 
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRATTACHMENT 2toL-97-280DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 2Page1of2DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION DescrfpI/on ofamendment request:Theproposedamendment toFacilityOperating LicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willmodifyspecifications forselectedcycle-specific reactorphysicsparameters torefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Editorial changesarealsoincludedforpurposesofclarification and/orconsistency.
TheproposedTechnical Specification (TS)changesconformtotheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter88-16andareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432, Revision1).Pursuantto10CFR50.92, adetermination maybemadethataproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration ifoperation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussed asfollows:(1)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Theproposedamendment relocates thecalculated valuesofselectedcycle-speciTic reactorphysicsparameter limitsfromtheTStotheCOLR,andincludesminoreditorial changeswhichdonotaltertheintentofstatedrequirements.
Theamendment isadministrative innatureandhasnoimpactonanyplantconfiguration orsystemperformance reliedupontomitigatetheconsequences ofanaccident.
Parameter limitsspecified intheCOLRforthisamendment arenotchangedfromthevaluespresently requiredbyTechnical Specifications.
Futurechangestothecalculated valuesofsuchlimitsmayonlybemadeusingNRCapprovedmethodologies, mustbeconsistent withallapplicable safetyanalysislimits,andarecontrolled bythe10CFR50.59process.Assumptions usedforaccidentinitiators and/orsafetyanalysisacceptance criteriaarenotchangedbythisamendment.
Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment willnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.
(2)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
Theproposedamendment relocates thecalculated valuesofcyclespecificreactorphysicslimitingparameters totheCOLRandwillnotchangethephysicalplantorthemodesofoperation definedinthefacilitylicense.Thechangesdonotinvolvetheadditionofnewequipment orthemodification ofexistingequipment, nordotheyalterthedesignconfiguration ofSt.Lucieplantsystems.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.
St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 2Page2of2(3)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Thecyclespecificparameter limitsbeingrelocated totheCOLRbythisamendment havenotbeenchangedfromthevaluespresently requiredbytheTS,andarequirement tooperatetheplantwithintheboundsofthelimitsspecified intheCOLRisretainedintheindividual specifications.
Futurechangestothecalculated valuesoftheselimitsbythelicenseemayonlybedeveloped usingNRC-approvedmethodologies, mustremainconsistent withallapplicable plantsafetyanalysislimitsaddressed intheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR),andarefurthercontrolled bythe10CFR50.59process.Asdiscussed inGenericLetter88-16,theadministrative controlsestablished forthevaluesofcyclespecificparameters usingtheguidanceofthatletterassureconformance with10CFR50.36.Safetyanalysisacceptance criteriaarenotbeingalteredbythisamendment.
Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedonthediscussion presented aboveandonthesupporting Evaluation ofProposedTSChanges,FPLhasconcluded thatthisproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration.}}

Revision as of 09:53, 29 June 2018

Application for Amend to License NPF-16,modifying Specifications for Selected cycle-specific Reactor Physics Parameters to Provide Reference to St Lucie Unit 2 Colr for Limiting Values
ML17309A911
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie, Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/29/1997
From: STALL J A
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17309A912 List:
References
RTR-NUREG-1432 GL-88-16, L-97-280, NUDOCS 9801060185
Download: ML17309A911 (14)


Text

FioridaPower6LightCompany,6351 S.OceanDrive,JensenBeach,FL34957December29,1997~L-97-28010CFR50.90U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission Attn:DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Re:St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRRef:(1)LetterfromR.P.Croteau(NRC)toJ.H.Goldberg(FPL),TurkeyPointUnits3and4-IssuanceofAmendments Re:Implementation ofFPLNuclearPhysicsMethodology (TACNos.M91393andM91394;June9,1995.Pursuantto10CFR50.90,FloridaPower&LightCompany(FPL)requeststoamendFacilityOperating LicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2byincorporating theattachedTechnical Specifications revisions.

Theamendment willmodifyspecifications forselectedcycle-specific reactorphysicsparameters sothattheyrefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Minoradministrative changesarealsoincluded.

TheproposedTSchangesconformtotheguidance.

providedinGenericLetter88-16andareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432, Revision1).Itisrequested thattheproposedamendment, ifapproved, beissuedbyJuly31,1998.Attachment 1isanevaluation oftheproposedTSchanges.Attachment 2isthe"Determination ofNoSignificant HazardsConsideration."

Attachment 3containsacopyoftheaffectedTSpagesmarked-up toshowtheproposedchanges.Enclosure (1)istheSt.LucieUnit2,Cycle10,CoreOperating LimitsReport.Enclosure (2)isSupplement 1toFPL'sTopicalReportNF-TR-95-01, NuclearPhysicsMethodology forReloadDesignofTurkeyPointandSt.LucieNuclearPlants,whichprovidescomparisons betweencorephysicspredictions andactualoperating dataforSt.LucieUnit2.TheoriginalreportreviewedbytheNRCstaff(Reference 1)didnotcontainSt.LucieUnit2specificdata.Thesupplement isvoluntarily submitted tofurtherdemonstrate FPL'sabilitytoperformreloadcoredesignforthatunit.Theproposedamendment hasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower&LightCompanyNuclearReviewBoard.Inaccordance with10CFR50.91(b)(1),acopyoftheproposedamendment isbeingforwarded totheStateDesigneefortheStateofFlorida.Pleasecontactusifthereareanyquestions aboutthissubmittal.

Verytrulyyours,p.o~"J.A.Stall,VicePresident St.LuciePlant980i060i85 97i229PDRADQCK05000250PPDRanFPLGroupcompanylllllllllllllllll illllllllllllllllll St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Page2JASIRLDAttachments

Enclosures:

(1)St.LucieUnit2,Cycle10,CoreOperating LimitsReport,Revision0.(2)NuclearPhysicsMethodology forReloadDesignofTurkeyPointandSt.LucieNuclearPlants,NF-TR-95-01, Supplement 1;August,1997.cc:RegionalAdministrator, RegionII,USNRC.SeniorResidentInspector, USNRC,St.LuciePlant.Mr.W.A.Passetti, FloridaDepartment ofHealthandRehabilitative Services.

St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Page3STATEOFFLORIDA))ss.COUNTYOFST.LUCIEJ.A.Stallbeingfirstdulysworn,deposesandsays:ThatheisVicePresident, St.LuciePlant,fortheNuclearDivisionofFloridaPower8LightCompany,theLicenseeherein;Thathehasexecutedtheforegoing document; thatthestatements madeinthisdocumentaretrueandcorrecttothebestofhisknowledge, information andbelief,andthatheisauthorized toexecutethedocumentonbehalfofsaidLicensee.

J.A.StallSTATEOFFLORIDACOUNTYOFSworntoandsubscribed beforemethis~dayofOd08Ã58(byJ.A.Stall,whoispersonally knowntome.Signature ofNotaublic-State ofFloridaLeslieJ.WMtwem~ss~:>>iNCOMMiSSiON fCCQ61S3EXPIAEShby12,2001'~i,~",~4'0NOED llRUTteyfhN$5URAHCE,INC.NameofNotaryPublic(Print,Type,orStamp)

St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRATTACHMENT 1toL-97-280EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGES

St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97>>280Attachment 1Page1of4EVALUATION OFPROPOSEDTSCHANGESIntroduction Theproposedamendment toFacilityOperating LicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willmodifyTechnical Specifications (TS)forselectedcycle-specific reactorphysicsparameters sothattheyrefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Minoradministrative changesarealsoincluded.

Therevisions conformtotheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter(GL)88-16andareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432, Revision1).TheproposedTSchangesortheCOLRdonotalterthevalueofanyoftheexistingparameter limits,andtheamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration.

BackroundAnumberofTSincludecycle-specific operating limitsforreactorphysicsparameters thataresubjecttochangeasafunctionofreloadcoredesign,andtheanalytical methodsusedtodetermine suchlimitsaretypically documented inTopicalReportsorinplant-specific submittals previously reviewedandapprovedbytheNRCstaff.Asaconsequence, thestaffsreviewofproposedchangestotheselimitsprimarily involvesconfirmation thattheupdatedlimitsarecalculated usinganNRCapprovedmethodology andareconsistent withallapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalyses.

Inordertoeliminate theburdenthatisassociated withtheprocessforrequesting, reviewing, andapproving alicenseamendment solelyforthepurposeofupdatingthecalculated valuesofcycle-specific parameter limits,GL88-16encouraged licensees toproposechangestotheirtechnical specifications thatareconsistent withtheguidanceprovidedinthatletter.Threeseparateactionstomodifytheplant'sTSarediscussed inGL88-16:(1)addingadefinition ofanamedformalreport,e.g.,COLR,thatincludesthevaluesofcycle-specific parameter limitsthathavebeenestablished usinganNRCapprovedmethodology andareconsistent withallapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalyses, (2)theadditionofanadministrative reporting requirement tosubmittheformalreporttotheCommission forinformation, and(3)themodification ofindividual TStonotethatcycle-specific parameters shallbemaintained withinthelimitsprovidedinthedefinedformalreport.TheNRCstaffnotedthat"itisessential tosafetythattheplantisoperatedwithintheboundsofcycle-specific parameter limitsandthatarequirement tomaintaintheplantwithintheappropriate boundsmustberetainedintheTS.However,thespecificvaluesoftheselimitsmaybemodifiedbylicensees, withoutaffecting nuclearsafety,providedthatthesechangesaredetermined usinganNRC-approved methodology and[are]consistent withallapplicable limitsoftheplantsafetyanalysisthatareaddressed intheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR)."TheconceptofaCOLRandtheprovisions ofGL88-16wereincorporated intotheimprovedStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432).

DescritionofChanesModifications toindividual specifications includereplacing theapplicable operating limitswithreferences totheCOLR,deletingapplicable figures,addingtherequireddefinition andadministrative

controls, andmakingeditorial changesasnecessary forthepurposeofclarification and/or St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 1Page2of4consistency.

CopiesoftheaffectedTSpages,marked-up toshowtheproposedchanges,arecontained inAttachment 3tothissubmittal.

Section1.0DEFINITIONS Addnewdefinition 1.9a,COREOPERATING LIMITSREPORTCOLR,showninInsert-AofAttachment 3tothissubmittal.

TS3.1.1.4MODERATOR TEMPERATURE COEFFICIENT Specification 3.1.1.4.c isdeleted,andtheassociated limitofmaximumnegativemoderator temperature coefficient atRATEDTHERMAL'OWER isrelocated totheCOLR.TS3/4.1.3MOVABLECONTROLASSEMBLIES

-CEAPOSITIONFigure3.1-1a,Allowable TimetoRealignCEAvs.InitialFR~,specifying thetimeconstraint forfullpoweroperation withoneCEAmisaligned fromanyotherCEAinitsgroupbymorethan15inchesisdeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3.1.3.6REGULATING CEAINSERTION LIMITSFigure3.1-2,%CEAInsertion vs.FractionofRatedThermalPower,showingtheregulating CEAgroupswithdrawal sequenceandinsertion limitsisdeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3/4.2.1LINEARHEATRATEFigure3.2-1,Allowable PeakLinearHeatRatevs.Bumup;Figure3.2-2,AxialShapeIndexvs.FractionofMaximumAllowable PowerLevelperSpecification 4.2.1.3;andFigure3.2-3,Allowable Combinations ofThermalPowerandFR',Fx',aredeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.Additionally, inSpecifications 4.2.1.3and4.2.1.4,thephrase"monitoring thecorepowerdistribution" ischangedto"monitoring thelinearheatrate".S'32.2OTALPLANARRADIALPEAKINGFACTOS-F~Thecalculated valuefortheF~limitisdeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3.23OTLINGTEDRDIALPKINGCOR-F~Thecalculated valuefortheF,~limit,andFigure3.2P,AxialShapeIndexOperating LimitswithFourReactorCoolantPumpsOperating, aredeletedfromTSandrelocated totheCOLR.TS3.2.5DNBPARAMETERS

-AXIALSHAPEINDEXTABLE3.2-2isrevisedtorefertoCOLRFigure3.2AfortheAXIALSHAPEINDEXlimit.

St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 1Page3of4TS3/4.9.1REFUELING OPERATIONS

-BORONCONCENTRATION Theboronconcentration limitsaredeletedfromtheTSandrelocated totheCOLR.BASES3/4.1.33/4.2.1and3/4.9.1Thebasesareupdatedtoreflectthechangestocorresponding TSdescribed above.Section6.0ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS:

Addnewadministrative control,"6.9.1.11 COREOPERATING LIIMITSREPORT(COLR)"asshowninInsert-BofAttachment 3tothissubmittal.

Page3/41-19a,page3/41-28,pages3/424through3/42-6,andpage3/42-12willbedeletedfromtheTSsincethesepageswillbeblank.Anoteisaddedtopage3/42-3and3/42-11whichdocuments deletionoftheaffectedpagesandmaintains continuity ofpagination.

BasesfortheProosedTSChanesCycle-specific parameter limitsestablished intheCOLR(Enclosure 1)havebeenrelocated withoutchangefromtheexistingTS.Theproposedamendment willallowFPLtomakechangestothelimitsestablished intheCOLR,providedNRC-approved methodsareusedandthecalculated parameter valuesareconsistent withallapplicable limitsoftheplantsafetyanalyses.

Underthespecified conditions, suchchangescanbemadewithoutanadverseimpactonnuclearsafety.DEFINITION 1.9aisaddedtotheSt.LucieUnit2Technical Specifications toformallydefinetheCoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR).TheCOLRwillprovidecyclespecificreactorphysicsparameter limitsforeachcurrentoperating reloadcyclethatarenototherwise retainedinindividual technical specifications.

Accordingly, LimitingConditions forOperation (LCO)3.1.1.4,Moderator Temperature Coefficient; 3/4.1.3,MovableControlAssemblies

-CEAPosition; 3.1.3.6,Regulating CEAInsertion Limits;3/4.2.1,LinearHeatRate;3.2.2,TotalPlanarRadialPeakingFactors;3.2.3,TotalIntegrated RadialPeakingFactor,3.2.5,DNBParameters; and3/4.9.1,Refueling Operations-BoronConcentration aremodifiedtoreplacethespecificvaluesofcycle-specific parameter limitswiththeappropriate reference totheformallydefinedCOLR.Theaffectedspecifications arealsomodified, asappropriate, torequirethattheplantbeoperatedwithintheboundsofthelimitsprovidedintheCOLR.TheproposedTSchangesconformtotheguidanceinGL88-16and,areconsistent withNUREG-1432.

Specification 6.9.1.11isaddedtotheadministrative controlssectionand(a)requiresthecycle-specificlimitsfortheabovelistedLCOstobedocumented intheCOLRpriortoeachreloadcycleorpriortoanyremaining portionofareloadcycle;(b)liststheapprovedanalytical methodsusedtodetermine thecoreoperating limits;(c)requiresthecoreoperating limitstobeconsistent withapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalyses; and(d)requirestheCOLR,including anyrevisions orsupplements thereto,tobeprovideduponissuanceforeachreloadcycletotheNRC.Theproposedspecification isconsistent withGL88-16andNUREG-1432.

St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 1-Page4of4Includedinthelistofdocuments describing theanalytical methodsisFPL'sTopicalReportNF-TR-95-01,"NuclearPhysicsMethodology forReloadDesignofTurkeyPoint&St.LucieNuclearPlants,"January,1995.Thetopicalreportwasapprovedasanacceptable reference intheCOLRandassociated TSforFPL'sTurkeyPointPlants(Reference 1),andforSt.LucieUnit1inAmendment No.150(4/1/97)toFacilityOperating LicenseDPR-67.Thetopicalreportdescribes theWestinghouse ElectricCorporation (W}nucleardesignmethodsandcomputerprogramsavailable atFPLforwhichFPLhasreceivedextensive training.

ForPSL2,thesafetyanalysismethodsofAseaBrownBoveri-Combustion Engineering (ABB-CE)andthenucleardesignmethodsofWareused,whereappropriate, indefiningthespecified COLRparameter limits.Thesafetyanalysisisperformed byABB-CEwiththeNRCapprovedcomputercodes.Thegeneration ofphysicsinputtothesafetyanalysisisaccomplished byeitherABB-CEusingtheircodesorbyFPLusingtheNRCapprovedWcomputercodes.SinceNF-TR-95-01 didnotincludeanybenchmark dataforPSL2,Supplement 1(August1997)totheTopicalReportisprovidedasEnclosure 2tothissubmittal tofurtherdemonstrate FPL'sabilitytoperformreloadcoredesignforSt.LucieUnit2.Thepredictions ofphysicsparameters usingtheWmethodsshowgoodagreement whencomparedtotheSt.LucieUnit2measureddata.InTS4.2.1.3and4.2.1.4,thephrase"corepowerdistribution" isreplacedwith"linearheatrate"tomoreaccurately reflectthemonitored parameter addressed bythesurveillance requirements.

Thisisanadministrative changeanddoesnotalterthespecified requirements.

Conclusion TheproposedchangestotheTechnical Specifications thathavecycle-specific parameter limitsconformtotheguidelines ofGL88-16.Thevaluesoftheseparameter limitsaredefinedintheCOLR.Inadditionto10CFR50.59,changestotheCOLRwillbecontrolled inaccordance withtheproposedadministrative controlsinthissubmittal whichrequiretheuseofNRC-approved analytical methodsandrequirethatallapplicable limitsofthesafetyanalysesaremet.TheCOLR,including anymid-cycle revisions orsupplements thereto,shallbeprovidedtotheNRCuponissuance, foreachreloadcycle.Accounting forplantspecificdifferences informat,theproposedTSchangesareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants.Asdiscussed inAttachment 2tothissubmittal, theproposedlicenseamendment doesnotinvolveasignificant hazardsconsideration

St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRATTACHMENT 2toL-97-280DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 2Page1of2DETERMINATION OFNOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION DescrfpI/on ofamendment request:Theproposedamendment toFacilityOperating LicenseNPF-16forSt.LucieUnit2(PSL2)willmodifyspecifications forselectedcycle-specific reactorphysicsparameters torefertotheSt.LucieUnit2CoreOperating LimitsReport(COLR)forlimitingvalues.Editorial changesarealsoincludedforpurposesofclarification and/orconsistency.

TheproposedTechnical Specification (TS)changesconformtotheguidanceprovidedinGenericLetter88-16andareconsistent withtheStandardTechnical Specifications forCombustion Engineering Plants(NUREG-1432, Revision1).Pursuantto10CFR50.92, adetermination maybemadethataproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration ifoperation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnot:(1)involveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(2)createthepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated; or(3)involveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Eachstandardisdiscussed asfollows:(1)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.

Theproposedamendment relocates thecalculated valuesofselectedcycle-speciTic reactorphysicsparameter limitsfromtheTStotheCOLR,andincludesminoreditorial changeswhichdonotaltertheintentofstatedrequirements.

Theamendment isadministrative innatureandhasnoimpactonanyplantconfiguration orsystemperformance reliedupontomitigatetheconsequences ofanaccident.

Parameter limitsspecified intheCOLRforthisamendment arenotchangedfromthevaluespresently requiredbyTechnical Specifications.

Futurechangestothecalculated valuesofsuchlimitsmayonlybemadeusingNRCapprovedmethodologies, mustbeconsistent withallapplicable safetyanalysislimits,andarecontrolled bythe10CFR50.59process.Assumptions usedforaccidentinitiators and/orsafetyanalysisacceptance criteriaarenotchangedbythisamendment.

Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment willnotinvolveasignificant increaseintheprobability orconsequences ofanaccidentpreviously evaluated.

(2)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.

Theproposedamendment relocates thecalculated valuesofcyclespecificreactorphysicslimitingparameters totheCOLRandwillnotchangethephysicalplantorthemodesofoperation definedinthefacilitylicense.Thechangesdonotinvolvetheadditionofnewequipment orthemodification ofexistingequipment, nordotheyalterthedesignconfiguration ofSt.Lucieplantsystems.Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotcreatethepossibility ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanyaccidentpreviously evaluated.

St.LucieUnit2DocketNo.50-389ProposedLicenseAmendment Core0eratinLimitsReortCOLRL-97-280Attachment 2Page2of2(3)Operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Thecyclespecificparameter limitsbeingrelocated totheCOLRbythisamendment havenotbeenchangedfromthevaluespresently requiredbytheTS,andarequirement tooperatetheplantwithintheboundsofthelimitsspecified intheCOLRisretainedintheindividual specifications.

Futurechangestothecalculated valuesoftheselimitsbythelicenseemayonlybedeveloped usingNRC-approvedmethodologies, mustremainconsistent withallapplicable plantsafetyanalysislimitsaddressed intheFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(FSAR),andarefurthercontrolled bythe10CFR50.59process.Asdiscussed inGenericLetter88-16,theadministrative controlsestablished forthevaluesofcyclespecificparameters usingtheguidanceofthatletterassureconformance with10CFR50.36.Safetyanalysisacceptance criteriaarenotbeingalteredbythisamendment.

Therefore, operation ofthefacilityinaccordance withtheproposedamendment wouldnotinvolveasignificant reduction inamarginofsafety.Basedonthediscussion presented aboveandonthesupporting Evaluation ofProposedTSChanges,FPLhasconcluded thatthisproposedlicenseamendment involvesnosignificant hazardsconsideration.