ML15035A298: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:February 24, 2015 
Mr. Robert R. Raymond Chair, Board of Selectment Town of Bernardston P.O. Box 504 Bernardston, MA 01337
==SUBJECT:==
EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE - VERMONT YANKEE 
==Dear Mr. Raymond:==
I am writing in response to your letter dated January 7, 2015, in which you expressed concerns regarding exemptions requested by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO, or the licensee) for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station's (VY's) emergency preparedness (EP) plan. Your letter specifically requested assurance that emergency planning zone funding is continued until all spent fuel is moved to dry cask storage and that off-site authorities continue to receive the earliest possible notice of emergency situations at the plant.
The EP requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.47, "Emergency Plans," and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities," continue to apply to a nuclear power reactor after permanent cessation of operations and removal of fuel from the reactor vessel. There are no explicit regulatory provisions distinguishing EP requirements for a power reactor that has been shut down from those for an operating power reactor. The types of accidents possible and the risks presented by a shutdown reactor are significantly lower than those for an operating reactor.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations permit licensees to seek an exemption from a requirement in cases where continued application of the regulation to the licensee to maintain its current level of EP is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the regulation. To modify their EP plans to reflect the risk commensurate with power reactors that have been permanently shut down, several power reactor licensees transitioning to decommissioning have sought exemptions from certain EP regulatory requirements before amending these plans. ENO has submitted such an exemption request for VY. 
When the licensee of an operating reactor decides to permanently cease operations and permanently defuels the reactor (i.e., when the reactor enters decommissioning), the primary risk to the public is associated with the spent fuel stored in the spent fuel pool (SFP). However, the risk of a radiological release from an SFP at a decommissioning plant is also lower than that from an SFP at an operating facility for the following reasons. First, fission product gases contained in spent fuel decay away within months after the fuel is last used to operate the reactor. Once the fission product gases have decayed to acceptable levels, there are no design-basis accidents (DBAs) that can result in an off-site release that would exceed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Protective Action Guidelines (PAGs). In addition, the decay heat generated by the spent fuel continues to decrease over time as the fission R. Raymond products in the fuel decay. Since no new spent fuel is being added to the SFP, the heat load in the SFP will decrease over time, therefore increasing the time available to respond and mitigate challenges to the stored spent fuel. Based on the slower evolution of potential events involving the SFP due to the continually decreasing heat generated by the spent fuel, the NRC has determined that sufficient time would be available for the licensee to take prompt mitigation measures consistent with plant conditions and, if necessary, for offsite authorities to implement protective action using a comprehensive emergency management plan (CEMP) (i.e., an all-hazards approach) to ensure public health and safety. This also serves as the basis for the increase in off-site notification time requested by the licensee for VY, which is consistent with previous exemptions granted by the NRC.
The NRC staff's technical evaluation of ENO's request for exemptions from certain EP requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," is discussed in a paper that the NRC staff has provided to the Commission, SECY-14-0125, "Request By Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements," dated November 14, 2014. The paper is publicly available in the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession  No. ML14227A711. The NRC staff's review determined that there is reasonable assurance that in granting the requested exemptions to ENO, that:  (1) an off-site radiological release will not exceed the EPA PAGs at the site boundary for a DBA; and (2) in the unlikely event of a beyond DBA resulting in a loss of all SFP cooling, there is sufficient time to initiate appropriate mitigating actions consistent with plant conditions and, if a release is projected to occur, there is sufficient time for offsite agencies to take protective actions using a CEMP to protect the health and safety of the public. The exemptions to EP requirements requested by ENO are consistent with exemptions previously granted for other permanently shut down and defueled power reactors. At this time, the NRC staff is awaiting a decision by the Commission on the NRC staff's recommendation in SECY-14-0125 before taking final action on the requested exemptions.
With respect to the notification timing requirements, the NRC regulations establish the requirements for nuclear power reactor licensees to notify State and local governmental authorities within 15 minutes. This requirement was established to ensure the capability for rapid notification of the public during a serious reactor emergency, with a design objective of completing the initial notification of the public within 15 minutes after notification by the licensee.
With the permanent cessation of reactor operations and relocation of the fuel to the SFP, the need for the prompt notification (within 15 minutes) of the public is not required for the reasons discussed previously. The change to a 60-minute notification requirement is consistent with the regulations for other NRC non-reactor licensees.
With respect to funding of offsite emergency planning, the NRC regulations establish the requirements for a licensee's radiological EP plans to ensure that the nuclear power plant operator is capable of implementing adequate measures to protect public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency. While it is within the jurisdiction of the NRC to confirm that its EP requirements are met, the NRC does not, however, have the ability to enforce the particular terms of the funding agreements negotiated between the licensee and the State.
R. Raymond Thank you for your interest in these matters. The NRC shares your concern of ensuring the safety of VY and the communities surrounding the site. The NRC will continue its oversight of the licensee's activities, as appropriate, and will hold the licensee accountable for ensuring its emergency response program is maintained in a state of readiness for protecting the public health and safety.
If you have further questions, please feel free to contact Ms. Nancy McNamara, Regional State Liaison Officer at (610) 337-5337, or Mr. Joseph Anderson of my staff at (301) 287-9300.        Sincerely,
      /RA/  J. Andersen for Robert J. Lewis, Director Division of Preparedness and Response Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response  cc: U.S. Senator Edward Markey    U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren U.S. Representative Richard Neal State Senator Stanley Rosenberg State Representative Paul Mark Commissioner Christopher Recchia, Vermont Department of Public Service Kurt Schwartz, Director, Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Peter Shedd, Emergency Management  Director, Town of Bernardston James Palmeri, Chief of Police, Town of Bernardston Beth Watrous, Brattleboro Rd, Bernardston
R. Raymond  Thank you for your interest in these matters. The NRC shares your concern of ensuring the safety of VY and the communities surrounding the site. The NRC will continue its oversight of the licensee's activities, as appropriate, and will hold the licensee accountable for ensuring its emergency response program is maintained in a state of readiness for protecting the public health and safety.
If you have further questions, please feel free to contact Ms. Nancy McNamara, Regional State Liaison Officer at (610) 337-5337, or Mr. Joseph Anderson of my staff at (301) 287-9300.
Sincerely,              /RA/  J. Andersen for Robert J. Lewis, Director Division of Preparedness and Response Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response cc:  U.S. Senator Edward Markey    U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren U.S. Representative Richard Neal  State Senator Stanley Rosenberg State Representative Paul Mark Commissioner Christopher Recchia, Vermont Department of Public Service Kurt Schwartz, Director, Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Peter Shedd, Emergency Management  Director, Town of Bernardston James Palmeri, Chief of Police, Town of Bernardston Beth Watrous, Brattleboro Rd, Bernardston  Distribution: NSIR/DPR/R/F RidsNSIRMail Center RidsEDOMail Center LTR-15-0036 RidsSECYMail Center  ADAMS ACCESSION No.:  ML15035A298  *via email          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY OFFICE: NSIR/DPR NRR/DORL NMSS/DUWP Region I NSIR/DPR NAME: DLewis TWengert* BWatson* NMcNamara* RLewis  J. Andersen for DATE: 2/4/15 2/18/15 2/9/15 2/4/15 2/24/15}}

Revision as of 01:08, 15 June 2018

LTR-15-0036-Ticket-Robert R. Raymond, Chair, Board of Selectment, Town of Benardstown, Letter Vermont Yankee Emergency Planning Zone, NSIR Response
ML15035A298
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/24/2015
From: Lewis R J
NRC/NSIR/DPR
To: Raymond R R
Town of Bernardston, MA
References
Download: ML15035A298 (4)


Text

February 24, 2015

Mr. Robert R. Raymond Chair, Board of Selectment Town of Bernardston P.O. Box 504 Bernardston, MA 01337

SUBJECT:

EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE - VERMONT YANKEE

Dear Mr. Raymond:

I am writing in response to your letter dated January 7, 2015, in which you expressed concerns regarding exemptions requested by Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO, or the licensee) for the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station's (VY's) emergency preparedness (EP) plan. Your letter specifically requested assurance that emergency planning zone funding is continued until all spent fuel is moved to dry cask storage and that off-site authorities continue to receive the earliest possible notice of emergency situations at the plant.

The EP requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.47, "Emergency Plans," and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, "Emergency Planning and Preparedness for Production and Utilization Facilities," continue to apply to a nuclear power reactor after permanent cessation of operations and removal of fuel from the reactor vessel. There are no explicit regulatory provisions distinguishing EP requirements for a power reactor that has been shut down from those for an operating power reactor. The types of accidents possible and the risks presented by a shutdown reactor are significantly lower than those for an operating reactor.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) regulations permit licensees to seek an exemption from a requirement in cases where continued application of the regulation to the licensee to maintain its current level of EP is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the regulation. To modify their EP plans to reflect the risk commensurate with power reactors that have been permanently shut down, several power reactor licensees transitioning to decommissioning have sought exemptions from certain EP regulatory requirements before amending these plans. ENO has submitted such an exemption request for VY.

When the licensee of an operating reactor decides to permanently cease operations and permanently defuels the reactor (i.e., when the reactor enters decommissioning), the primary risk to the public is associated with the spent fuel stored in the spent fuel pool (SFP). However, the risk of a radiological release from an SFP at a decommissioning plant is also lower than that from an SFP at an operating facility for the following reasons. First, fission product gases contained in spent fuel decay away within months after the fuel is last used to operate the reactor. Once the fission product gases have decayed to acceptable levels, there are no design-basis accidents (DBAs) that can result in an off-site release that would exceed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Protective Action Guidelines (PAGs). In addition, the decay heat generated by the spent fuel continues to decrease over time as the fission R. Raymond products in the fuel decay. Since no new spent fuel is being added to the SFP, the heat load in the SFP will decrease over time, therefore increasing the time available to respond and mitigate challenges to the stored spent fuel. Based on the slower evolution of potential events involving the SFP due to the continually decreasing heat generated by the spent fuel, the NRC has determined that sufficient time would be available for the licensee to take prompt mitigation measures consistent with plant conditions and, if necessary, for offsite authorities to implement protective action using a comprehensive emergency management plan (CEMP) (i.e., an all-hazards approach) to ensure public health and safety. This also serves as the basis for the increase in off-site notification time requested by the licensee for VY, which is consistent with previous exemptions granted by the NRC.

The NRC staff's technical evaluation of ENO's request for exemptions from certain EP requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," is discussed in a paper that the NRC staff has provided to the Commission, SECY-14-0125, "Request By Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. for Exemptions from Certain Emergency Planning Requirements," dated November 14, 2014. The paper is publicly available in the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) under Accession No. ML14227A711. The NRC staff's review determined that there is reasonable assurance that in granting the requested exemptions to ENO, that: (1) an off-site radiological release will not exceed the EPA PAGs at the site boundary for a DBA; and (2) in the unlikely event of a beyond DBA resulting in a loss of all SFP cooling, there is sufficient time to initiate appropriate mitigating actions consistent with plant conditions and, if a release is projected to occur, there is sufficient time for offsite agencies to take protective actions using a CEMP to protect the health and safety of the public. The exemptions to EP requirements requested by ENO are consistent with exemptions previously granted for other permanently shut down and defueled power reactors. At this time, the NRC staff is awaiting a decision by the Commission on the NRC staff's recommendation in SECY-14-0125 before taking final action on the requested exemptions.

With respect to the notification timing requirements, the NRC regulations establish the requirements for nuclear power reactor licensees to notify State and local governmental authorities within 15 minutes. This requirement was established to ensure the capability for rapid notification of the public during a serious reactor emergency, with a design objective of completing the initial notification of the public within 15 minutes after notification by the licensee.

With the permanent cessation of reactor operations and relocation of the fuel to the SFP, the need for the prompt notification (within 15 minutes) of the public is not required for the reasons discussed previously. The change to a 60-minute notification requirement is consistent with the regulations for other NRC non-reactor licensees.

With respect to funding of offsite emergency planning, the NRC regulations establish the requirements for a licensee's radiological EP plans to ensure that the nuclear power plant operator is capable of implementing adequate measures to protect public health and safety in the event of a radiological emergency. While it is within the jurisdiction of the NRC to confirm that its EP requirements are met, the NRC does not, however, have the ability to enforce the particular terms of the funding agreements negotiated between the licensee and the State.

R. Raymond Thank you for your interest in these matters. The NRC shares your concern of ensuring the safety of VY and the communities surrounding the site. The NRC will continue its oversight of the licensee's activities, as appropriate, and will hold the licensee accountable for ensuring its emergency response program is maintained in a state of readiness for protecting the public health and safety.

If you have further questions, please feel free to contact Ms. Nancy McNamara, Regional State Liaison Officer at (610) 337-5337, or Mr. Joseph Anderson of my staff at (301) 287-9300. Sincerely,

/RA/ J. Andersen for Robert J. Lewis, Director Division of Preparedness and Response Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response cc: U.S. Senator Edward Markey U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren U.S. Representative Richard Neal State Senator Stanley Rosenberg State Representative Paul Mark Commissioner Christopher Recchia, Vermont Department of Public Service Kurt Schwartz, Director, Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Peter Shedd, Emergency Management Director, Town of Bernardston James Palmeri, Chief of Police, Town of Bernardston Beth Watrous, Brattleboro Rd, Bernardston

R. Raymond Thank you for your interest in these matters. The NRC shares your concern of ensuring the safety of VY and the communities surrounding the site. The NRC will continue its oversight of the licensee's activities, as appropriate, and will hold the licensee accountable for ensuring its emergency response program is maintained in a state of readiness for protecting the public health and safety.

If you have further questions, please feel free to contact Ms. Nancy McNamara, Regional State Liaison Officer at (610) 337-5337, or Mr. Joseph Anderson of my staff at (301) 287-9300.

Sincerely, /RA/ J. Andersen for Robert J. Lewis, Director Division of Preparedness and Response Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response cc: U.S. Senator Edward Markey U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren U.S. Representative Richard Neal State Senator Stanley Rosenberg State Representative Paul Mark Commissioner Christopher Recchia, Vermont Department of Public Service Kurt Schwartz, Director, Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Peter Shedd, Emergency Management Director, Town of Bernardston James Palmeri, Chief of Police, Town of Bernardston Beth Watrous, Brattleboro Rd, Bernardston Distribution: NSIR/DPR/R/F RidsNSIRMail Center RidsEDOMail Center LTR-15-0036 RidsSECYMail Center ADAMS ACCESSION No.: ML15035A298 *via email OFFICIAL RECORD COPY OFFICE: NSIR/DPR NRR/DORL NMSS/DUWP Region I NSIR/DPR NAME: DLewis TWengert* BWatson* NMcNamara* RLewis J. Andersen for DATE: 2/4/15 2/18/15 2/9/15 2/4/15 2/24/15