ML18016B077: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Environmental Panel)*January 23, 2018 2Panelists*Benjamin Beasley-Chief, Environmental Review and NEPA Branch,NRR*Nancy Martinez-Physical Scientist,NRR*Michelle Moser-Biologist,NRR*David Drucker-Senior Project Manager,NRR2 EnvironmentalReview*National Environmental PolicyAct*Environmental reviewprocess-10 CFR Part51-Interim StaffGuidanceAugmenting NUREG-1537 for Licensing Radioisotope Production Facilities and Aqueous Homogenous Reactors3 Scope of the Review: Proposed Action and Connected ActionsActions are connected if they:-Automatically trigger other actions that may require environmental impact statements; or-Cannot or will not proceed unless other actions are taken previously or simultaneously; or-Are interdependent parts of a larger action and depend on the larger action for their justification4 Proposed Action and Connected Actions*Construction, operations, and decommissioning of the 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Construction, operations, and decommissioning related to target fabrication*Transportation of targets to/from research reactors and irradiation of targets at research reactors5 6Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)*10 CFR51.20*Project-specificdecision-Operation of the proposed Northwest facility would include target fabrication and scrap recovery-Environmental assessment might not support a finding of no significant impact6 7ScopingProcess*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri *Sixoralcommenters*Eightcomment letters or emails7 Environmental ReviewAreasHumanHealthTerrestrial ResourcesAirQualitySocioeconomics and EnvironmentalJusticeLandUseHistoric and CulturalResourcesWaterResourcesAquaticResourcesSoils8 EnvironmentalImpactsResourceAreaImpactLand Use and VisualResourcesSMALLAir Quality andNoiseSMALLGeologicEnvironmentSMALLEcological and WaterResourcesSMALLHistoric and CulturalResourcesSMALLSocioeconomicsSMALLHuman Health andWasteSMALLTransportationSMALL9 ConsultationsActDeterminationEndangeredSpecies Act, Section7No EffectNationalHistoric Preservation Act, Section 106No Adverse Effect10 Alternatives*No-actionalternative*Alternativesite*Alternative technologies11 AlternativeTechnologies*Neutroncapture*Aqueous homogenousreactor*Selective gas extraction*Linear-accelerator-based-Analyzed indepth*Subcritical fission-Analyzed indepth12 Costs andBenefits*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission*Costs-Environmental andfinancial*Benefits-Societal, medical, andeconomic13 Draft Environmental Impact Statement*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri*Seven oral commenters*Five comment letters or emails14 StaffConclusion and Recommendation*Benefits (societal, medical, and economic) outweigh the costs (environmental, economic)*Considered reasonable alternatives*Recommend issuance of the constructionpermit15 FutureNEPA Analyses*Application for an operating license*Application for a license to possess and use special nuclear material for target fabrication and scrap recovery*License amendment requests from research reactors16 Acronyms17*EIS -Environmental Impact Statement*NEPA -National Environmental Policy Act*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | {{#Wiki_filter:Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Environmental Panel)*January 23, 2018 2Panelists*Benjamin Beasley-Chief, Environmental Review and NEPA Branch,NRR*Nancy Martinez-Physical Scientist,NRR*Michelle Moser-Biologist,NRR*David Drucker-Senior Project Manager,NRR2 EnvironmentalReview*National Environmental PolicyAct*Environmental reviewprocess-10 CFR Part51-Interim StaffGuidanceAugmenting NUREG-1537 for Licensing Radioisotope Production Facilities and Aqueous Homogenous Reactors3 Scope of the Review: Proposed Action and Connected ActionsActions are connected if they:-Automatically trigger other actions that may require environmental impact statements; or-Cannot or will not proceed unless other actions are taken previously or simultaneously; or-Are interdependent parts of a larger action and depend on the larger action for their justification4 Proposed Action and Connected Actions*Construction, operations, and decommissioning of the 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Construction, operations, and decommissioning related to target fabrication*Transportation of targets to/from research reactors and irradiation of targets at research reactors5 6Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)*10 CFR51.20*Project-specificdecision-Operation of the proposed Northwest facility would include target fabrication and scrap recovery-Environmental assessment might not support a finding of no significant impact6 7ScopingProcess*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri *Sixoralcommenters*Eightcomment letters or emails7 Environmental ReviewAreasHumanHealthTerrestrial ResourcesAirQualitySocioeconomics and EnvironmentalJusticeLandUseHistoric and CulturalResourcesWaterResourcesAquaticResourcesSoils8 EnvironmentalImpactsResourceAreaImpactLand Use and VisualResourcesSMALLAir Quality andNoiseSMALLGeologicEnvironmentSMALLEcological and WaterResourcesSMALLHistoric and CulturalResourcesSMALLSocioeconomicsSMALLHuman Health andWasteSMALLTransportationSMALL9 ConsultationsActDeterminationEndangeredSpecies Act, Section7No EffectNationalHistoric Preservation Act, Section 106No Adverse Effect10 Alternatives*No-actionalternative*Alternativesite*Alternative technologies11 AlternativeTechnologies*Neutroncapture*Aqueous homogenousreactor*Selective gas extraction*Linear-accelerator-based-Analyzed indepth*Subcritical fission-Analyzed indepth12 Costs andBenefits*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission*Costs-Environmental andfinancial*Benefits-Societal, medical, andeconomic13 Draft Environmental Impact Statement*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri*Seven oral commenters*Five comment letters or emails14 StaffConclusion and Recommendation*Benefits (societal, medical, and economic) outweigh the costs (environmental, economic)*Considered reasonable alternatives*Recommend issuance of the constructionpermit15 FutureNEPA Analyses*Application for an operating license*Application for a license to possess and use special nuclear material for target fabrication and scrap recovery*License amendment requests from research reactors16 Acronyms17*EIS -Environmental Impact Statement*NEPA -National Environmental Policy Act*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}} | ||
}} | |||
Revision as of 03:27, 18 May 2018
| ML18016B077 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Northwest Medical Isotopes |
| Issue date: | 01/16/2018 |
| From: | NRC/OGC |
| To: | NRC/OCM |
| SECY RAS | |
| References | |
| 50-609-CP, Construction Permit Mndtry Hrg, RAS 54173 | |
| Download: ML18016B077 (17) | |
Text
Northwest Medical IsotopesConstruction Permit Application Review*Mandatory Hearing (Environmental Panel)*January 23, 2018 2Panelists*Benjamin Beasley-Chief, Environmental Review and NEPA Branch,NRR*Nancy Martinez-Physical Scientist,NRR*Michelle Moser-Biologist,NRR*David Drucker-Senior Project Manager,NRR2 EnvironmentalReview*National Environmental PolicyAct*Environmental reviewprocess-10 CFR Part51-Interim StaffGuidanceAugmenting NUREG-1537 for Licensing Radioisotope Production Facilities and Aqueous Homogenous Reactors3 Scope of the Review: Proposed Action and Connected ActionsActions are connected if they:-Automatically trigger other actions that may require environmental impact statements; or-Cannot or will not proceed unless other actions are taken previously or simultaneously; or-Are interdependent parts of a larger action and depend on the larger action for their justification4 Proposed Action and Connected Actions*Construction, operations, and decommissioning of the 10 CFR Part 50 production facility*Construction, operations, and decommissioning related to target fabrication*Transportation of targets to/from research reactors and irradiation of targets at research reactors5 6Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)*10 CFR51.20*Project-specificdecision-Operation of the proposed Northwest facility would include target fabrication and scrap recovery-Environmental assessment might not support a finding of no significant impact6 7ScopingProcess*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri *Sixoralcommenters*Eightcomment letters or emails7 Environmental ReviewAreasHumanHealthTerrestrial ResourcesAirQualitySocioeconomics and EnvironmentalJusticeLandUseHistoric and CulturalResourcesWaterResourcesAquaticResourcesSoils8 EnvironmentalImpactsResourceAreaImpactLand Use and VisualResourcesSMALLAir Quality andNoiseSMALLGeologicEnvironmentSMALLEcological and WaterResourcesSMALLHistoric and CulturalResourcesSMALLSocioeconomicsSMALLHuman Health andWasteSMALLTransportationSMALL9 ConsultationsActDeterminationEndangeredSpecies Act, Section7No EffectNationalHistoric Preservation Act, Section 106No Adverse Effect10 Alternatives*No-actionalternative*Alternativesite*Alternative technologies11 AlternativeTechnologies*Neutroncapture*Aqueous homogenousreactor*Selective gas extraction*Linear-accelerator-based-Analyzed indepth*Subcritical fission-Analyzed indepth12 Costs andBenefits*Purpose-Inform recommendation to the Commission*Costs-Environmental andfinancial*Benefits-Societal, medical, andeconomic13 Draft Environmental Impact Statement*Public meeting in Columbia, Missouri*Seven oral commenters*Five comment letters or emails14 StaffConclusion and Recommendation*Benefits (societal, medical, and economic) outweigh the costs (environmental, economic)*Considered reasonable alternatives*Recommend issuance of the constructionpermit15 FutureNEPA Analyses*Application for an operating license*Application for a license to possess and use special nuclear material for target fabrication and scrap recovery*License amendment requests from research reactors16 Acronyms17*EIS -Environmental Impact Statement*NEPA -National Environmental Policy Act*NRR -Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation