ML17209A599: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| document type = OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING, TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORINFORMATIONDISTRIBUTIONSSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSIONNBR;8102030279DOC~DATE:81/01/19NOTARIZED:NOFACIL:50"335-St~LucioPlant~Unit1~FloridaPower8LightCoo'AUTH~NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONUHRIGiR~E.'loridaPower'.8LightCo~RECIP~NAME.RECIPIENTAFFILIATIONEISENHUTgD~G~AssistantDirectorforLicensing
==SUBJECT:==
RequestsamendtoAppAofLicenseDPR67'roposalrespondstoCondition9ofEncl1toOLLsuppls790209submittal'afetyevaluationencl.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:A001SCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR"ENCL'"SIZE:TITLE:GeneralDistributionfor.afteiIssuance'fOperatingLicense.NOTES;DOCKET¹05000335RECIPIENTCOPIESIDCODE/NAME;LTTRENCLACTION;CLARKeR~041313RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAME'OPIESLTTR'NCLINTERNAL:D/DIRpHUMFAC08ILE0611REGF0111221011DIRgDIVOFLICNRCPDR02ORASSESSBR1011.1110EXTERNAL;ACRSNSIC090516161LPDR0311-IFEB041981TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED~LTTR39ENCL37II 0IIjltI'1Ar(eLini$fEfcrP141%Ik P.O.BOX529100,MIAMI,FL331526++Puui,upsFLORIDAPOWER5LIGHTCOMPANYJanuary19,1981L-81-20OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulationAttention:Nr.DarrellG.Eisenhut,DirectorDivisionofLicensingU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionWashington,D.C,20555
==DearHr.Stello:==
Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedAmendmenttoFacilit0eratinLicenseDPR-67Inaccordancewith10CFR50.30,FloridaPower5LightCompanysubmitsherewiththree(3)signedoriginalsandforty(40)conformedcopiesofarequesttoamendAppendixAoFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67.ThisproposalisbeingmadeinresponsetoConditiongofEnclosure1totheoperatinglicense,andsupplementsanearliersubmittaldatedFebruary9,1979(L-79-37).Pae6-16bNewSpecification4.6.2.2.disaddedtorequireflowpathverificationtestingoftheNaOHcontainmentsprayadditivesystemonaonceper5yearbasis.TheproposedamendmenthasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower8LightCompanyNuclearReviewSoard.Theyhaveconcludedthat,itdoesnotinvolveanunreviewedsafetyquestion,Verytrulyours,obertE.UhrigVicePresidentAdvancedSystems5TechnologyREU/MAS/TCG/ahAttachmentcc:JamesP.O'Reilly,RegionIIHaroldF.Reis,EsquirePocI5~j~P3CPGSQu2F'0PEOPLE...SERVINGPEOPLE SAFETYEVALUATIONRe:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335SraAdditiveFlowPathVerificationNaOHIntroductionThisevaluationsupportstheproposedadditionofTechnicalSpecificationsurveillancerequirement4.6.2.2.d.TheadditionalsurveillanceisbeingproposedinresponsetoConditiongofEnclosure1toOperatingLicenseDPR-67.ConditiongwasestablishedbyAmendment26datedMay23,1978.II.DiscussionNewspecification4.6.2.2.disaddedtorequireflowpathverificationtestingoftheNaOHContainmentSprayAdditiveSystemonaonceperfiveyearbasis.Theflowpathverificationwouldconsistofatwostepprocesswitheachstepinvolvingflowratemeasurement.First,NaOHwouldbeallowedtoflowfromtheNaOHSprayAdditiveTanktoatestconnectionimmediatelydownstreamofthetankoutletvalvewh'ereflowratewouldbemeasured.Afterthisfirstflowratemeasurement,theinitialsectionoftestlinewouldbeflushedanddemineralizedwaterinjected(atthetestconnection)intotheContainmentSpraySystemwhereasecondflowratemeasurementwouldbemade.Anymodificationsneededtosupporttheproposedflowratetestingtoflowpathver'ificationwillbemadebeforetheendofthefirstsurveillanceinterval.Flowratetestingrepresentsadditionalsurveillanceandprovidesadditionalassurancethatthesprayadditivesystemwillmaintainoperability.III.ConclusionsThenewspecificationprovidesadditionalsurveillance.Assuch,itprovidesaddedreliabilityforthesprayadditivesystemandthustendstoincreasemarginsofsafety.Basedontheconsiderationsdiscussedabove,(1)theamendmentdoesnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofaccidentspreviouslyconsideredanddoesnotinvolveasignificantdecreaseinasafetymargin,(2)thereisreasonableassurancethatthehealthandsafetyofthepublicwillnotbeendangeredbyoperationintheproposedmanner,and(3)suchactivitieswillbeconductedincompliancewiththeCommission'sregulationsandtheissuanceofthisamendmentwillnotbeinimicalto.thecommondefenseandsecurityortothehealthandsafetyofthepublic.
}}
}}

Revision as of 14:29, 26 April 2018

Requests Amend to App a of License DPR-67.Proposal Responds to Condition Q of Encl 1 to OL & Suppls 790209 Submittal. Safety Evaluation Encl
ML17209A599
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/19/1981
From: UHRIG R E
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: EISENHUT D G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17209A600 List:
References
L-81-20, NUDOCS 8102030279
Download: ML17209A599 (4)


Text

REGULATORINFORMATIONDISTRIBUTIONSSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSIONNBR;8102030279DOC~DATE:81/01/19NOTARIZED:NOFACIL:50"335-St~LucioPlant~Unit1~FloridaPower8LightCoo'AUTH~NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATIONUHRIGiR~E.'loridaPower'.8LightCo~RECIP~NAME.RECIPIENTAFFILIATIONEISENHUTgD~G~AssistantDirectorforLicensing

SUBJECT:

RequestsamendtoAppAofLicenseDPR67'roposalrespondstoCondition9ofEncl1toOLLsuppls790209submittal'afetyevaluationencl.DISTRIBUTIONCODE:A001SCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR"ENCL'"SIZE:TITLE:GeneralDistributionfor.afteiIssuance'fOperatingLicense.NOTES;DOCKET¹05000335RECIPIENTCOPIESIDCODE/NAME;LTTRENCLACTION;CLARKeR~041313RECIPIENTIDCODE/NAME'OPIESLTTR'NCLINTERNAL:D/DIRpHUMFAC08ILE0611REGF0111221011DIRgDIVOFLICNRCPDR02ORASSESSBR1011.1110EXTERNAL;ACRSNSIC090516161LPDR0311-IFEB041981TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED~LTTR39ENCL37II 0IIjltI'1Ar(eLini$fEfcrP141%Ik P.O.BOX529100,MIAMI,FL331526++Puui,upsFLORIDAPOWER5LIGHTCOMPANYJanuary19,1981L-81-20OfficeofNuclearReactorRegulationAttention:Nr.DarrellG.Eisenhut,DirectorDivisionofLicensingU.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionWashington,D.C,20555

DearHr.Stello:

Re:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335ProposedAmendmenttoFacilit0eratinLicenseDPR-67Inaccordancewith10CFR50.30,FloridaPower5LightCompanysubmitsherewiththree(3)signedoriginalsandforty(40)conformedcopiesofarequesttoamendAppendixAoFacilityOperatingLicenseDPR-67.ThisproposalisbeingmadeinresponsetoConditiongofEnclosure1totheoperatinglicense,andsupplementsanearliersubmittaldatedFebruary9,1979(L-79-37).Pae6-16bNewSpecification4.6.2.2.disaddedtorequireflowpathverificationtestingoftheNaOHcontainmentsprayadditivesystemonaonceper5yearbasis.TheproposedamendmenthasbeenreviewedbytheSt.LucieFacilityReviewGroupandtheFloridaPower8LightCompanyNuclearReviewSoard.Theyhaveconcludedthat,itdoesnotinvolveanunreviewedsafetyquestion,Verytrulyours,obertE.UhrigVicePresidentAdvancedSystems5TechnologyREU/MAS/TCG/ahAttachmentcc:JamesP.O'Reilly,RegionIIHaroldF.Reis,EsquirePocI5~j~P3CPGSQu2F'0PEOPLE...SERVINGPEOPLE SAFETYEVALUATIONRe:St.LucieUnit1DocketNo.50-335SraAdditiveFlowPathVerificationNaOHIntroductionThisevaluationsupportstheproposedadditionofTechnicalSpecificationsurveillancerequirement4.6.2.2.d.TheadditionalsurveillanceisbeingproposedinresponsetoConditiongofEnclosure1toOperatingLicenseDPR-67.ConditiongwasestablishedbyAmendment26datedMay23,1978.II.DiscussionNewspecification4.6.2.2.disaddedtorequireflowpathverificationtestingoftheNaOHContainmentSprayAdditiveSystemonaonceperfiveyearbasis.Theflowpathverificationwouldconsistofatwostepprocesswitheachstepinvolvingflowratemeasurement.First,NaOHwouldbeallowedtoflowfromtheNaOHSprayAdditiveTanktoatestconnectionimmediatelydownstreamofthetankoutletvalvewh'ereflowratewouldbemeasured.Afterthisfirstflowratemeasurement,theinitialsectionoftestlinewouldbeflushedanddemineralizedwaterinjected(atthetestconnection)intotheContainmentSpraySystemwhereasecondflowratemeasurementwouldbemade.Anymodificationsneededtosupporttheproposedflowratetestingtoflowpathver'ificationwillbemadebeforetheendofthefirstsurveillanceinterval.Flowratetestingrepresentsadditionalsurveillanceandprovidesadditionalassurancethatthesprayadditivesystemwillmaintainoperability.III.ConclusionsThenewspecificationprovidesadditionalsurveillance.Assuch,itprovidesaddedreliabilityforthesprayadditivesystemandthustendstoincreasemarginsofsafety.Basedontheconsiderationsdiscussedabove,(1)theamendmentdoesnotinvolveasignificantincreaseintheprobabilityorconsequencesofaccidentspreviouslyconsideredanddoesnotinvolveasignificantdecreaseinasafetymargin,(2)thereisreasonableassurancethatthehealthandsafetyofthepublicwillnotbeendangeredbyoperationintheproposedmanner,and(3)suchactivitieswillbeconductedincompliancewiththeCommission'sregulationsandtheissuanceofthisamendmentwillnotbeinimicalto.thecommondefenseandsecurityortothehealthandsafetyofthepublic.