ML120110028: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:MD7112
| stage = Other
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Boggi, MichaelTo:Feintuch, KarlSubject:RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response <ae>Date:Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:13:40 AMKarl, Thanks for the information. This is the exact level of detail I was interested in. Muchappreciated!
Mike From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:10 AMTo: Boggi, MichaelSubject: RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response Reacting to your message of 12/30/11, I sent:=========From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 9:14 AMTo: Jack GadzalaSubject: Kewaunee: question concerning personnel fatigue management Jack, I received a question concerning fatigue management (human performance). Canyou confirm if you have implemented a "MDO alternative" (otherwise known as the "54maximum average") on January 1, 2012?
Karl Feintuch
=========
On 1/3/2012, Jack Gadzala called and provided the following information:1 - Kewaunee did not start the "54 Average" process on 1/1/12 due to lack of operationalsoftware ("EmpCenter") from the vendor to support the 54 Average calculations.2 - EmpCenter is widely used in industry (I did not ask for details). However, the 54Average calculation appears not to be ready for anyone. Thus, a Kewaunee deploymentdate is not yet determined.3 - Kewaunee's primary POC for the 54 Average process is MaryJo Haese (who I know). She is to advise me when a forecasted date for adoption is provided by the vendor.
Questions for you (Mike)a - Do you need more detail or a conference call for direct contact?b - Is this message from me adequate or do you need the licensee to provide thisinformation in an email message (I discussed this contingency with Jack in case it wouldbe necessary)?c - Noting the large distribution on Undine's original message below, is my response justto you adequate?
Karl From: Boggi, Michael Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 10:46 AMTo: Feintuch, KarlSubject: Kewaunee Part 26 question Karl, Can you confirm that Kewaunee is implementing the alternative cumulative fatiguemanagement provision called the MDO alternative, otherwise known as the 54 maximumaverage. Thanks Karl, it is good that I can finally ask you a Kewaunee question!
Mike Boggix5309
From: Shoop, Undine Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:27 PMTo: Desaulniers, David; Boggi, Michael; Martin, Kamishan; Smith, Will; Harris, Paul; Benowitz, Howard;Barnes, ValerieSubject: FYI  The Resident Inspector at Kewaunee has reported that Dominion has decided that they willimplement the 10 CFR Part 26 alternative 54 hours per week average (versus MDO's) on January 1,2012. Undine ShoopChief, Health Physics and Human Performance BranchDivision of Inspection and Regional SupportOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation301-415-2063 
}}
}}

Revision as of 07:43, 2 April 2018

2012/01/11 NRR E-mail Capture - Kewaunee Part 26 Question
ML120110028
Person / Time
Site: Kewaunee Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 01/03/2012
From: Boggi M A
NRC/NRR/DRA
To: Feintuch K D
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
TAC MD7112
Download: ML120110028 (2)


Text

From:Boggi, MichaelTo:Feintuch, KarlSubject:RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response <ae>Date:Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:13:40 AMKarl, Thanks for the information. This is the exact level of detail I was interested in. Muchappreciated!

Mike From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 10:10 AMTo: Boggi, MichaelSubject: RE: Kewaunee Part 26 question - Kewaunee response Reacting to your message of 12/30/11, I sent:=========From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Monday, January 02, 2012 9:14 AMTo: Jack GadzalaSubject: Kewaunee: question concerning personnel fatigue management Jack, I received a question concerning fatigue management (human performance). Canyou confirm if you have implemented a "MDO alternative" (otherwise known as the "54maximum average") on January 1, 2012?

Karl Feintuch

=

On 1/3/2012, Jack Gadzala called and provided the following information:1 - Kewaunee did not start the "54 Average" process on 1/1/12 due to lack of operationalsoftware ("EmpCenter") from the vendor to support the 54 Average calculations.2 - EmpCenter is widely used in industry (I did not ask for details). However, the 54Average calculation appears not to be ready for anyone. Thus, a Kewaunee deploymentdate is not yet determined.3 - Kewaunee's primary POC for the 54 Average process is MaryJo Haese (who I know). She is to advise me when a forecasted date for adoption is provided by the vendor.

Questions for you (Mike)a - Do you need more detail or a conference call for direct contact?b - Is this message from me adequate or do you need the licensee to provide thisinformation in an email message (I discussed this contingency with Jack in case it wouldbe necessary)?c - Noting the large distribution on Undine's original message below, is my response justto you adequate?

Karl From: Boggi, Michael Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 10:46 AMTo: Feintuch, KarlSubject: Kewaunee Part 26 question Karl, Can you confirm that Kewaunee is implementing the alternative cumulative fatiguemanagement provision called the MDO alternative, otherwise known as the 54 maximumaverage. Thanks Karl, it is good that I can finally ask you a Kewaunee question!

Mike Boggix5309

From: Shoop, Undine Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:27 PMTo: Desaulniers, David; Boggi, Michael; Martin, Kamishan; Smith, Will; Harris, Paul; Benowitz, Howard;Barnes, ValerieSubject: FYI The Resident Inspector at Kewaunee has reported that Dominion has decided that they willimplement the 10 CFR Part 26 alternative 54 hours6.25e-4 days <br />0.015 hours <br />8.928571e-5 weeks <br />2.0547e-5 months <br /> per week average (versus MDO's) on January 1,2012. Undine ShoopChief, Health Physics and Human Performance BranchDivision of Inspection and Regional SupportOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation301-415-2063